<<

. ( . . f} ✓ > ' · J> - J' - , >l / . , . '1" · , l' '! . . <" ' . 1-·1'1 •• ,, T,f- h; ,:_� /-1.. )PV- "'-" , {r}n••f-_ j'Y/rr.A {)} ,,1 L ,,tJ -f:· -'P ,v,.; ._,,f; ! !,..,; (/ t'}j '''l.._,,., _,(' '.Jt... t,t'f t���· q,l{, t.,::>, ,.,f" 'P- v '1,- -��f f- y-- l,vvi 'f),,--..t. ) )S:,0 1.-"( ,:� .,;'Pt··, i '1i, [ ,t; ')- --\'- . ,; ..,, 4,.rp, ) Vi·"'-1 l { ,-;.i (.'✓"i,ll"/il;d/J:-_, N '1) ii" � t ,[ (' ; f ') -i-·r1 ;T{i ) {"' , ,-, ,, ' f� · - . · . v•.l .Ji✓ s\/l !-ti t, ,,,! •.>. :, f, i . ,t.J:t 1-�tt,,(..f ,./ /,·L '(',.<� di .!. t ,(,_, •�.J.rnt'.H!vl !ftJ n--

. . _ . . {? . . /W''' .)/l } ) � . ''P 1.;(i -<;, '"\.t/ , ,C. f . . . i' �,' ,, ' '· /) ·� ,.. ,} liu'.. ,/... 1.... • ck., n (,_.t, t-,,y--..H C./" - U">1; -Th· . /) <,".. , 'er- f t,{., } (,-tu{; ,/1w''l ';Lp � c,'} t '1,F ,·� t !.', f.1 ') ,;:. fi;-,,., i,,,, ,r: ,, '''f., '','' C · f;.. '}\ : f ,y --hu. O'.. (;: (,. {' )V., ·{ ,,,t...... -i; -;- A- n fl i ,-\. ...y ; ",. . · , · - ;: , _: ; i,1.,. ,H ,k d , J. t <,d 1.(,.-y ,:1 ,ll:..p ·:· r (.\.: . .,, 'V(7,,u.L .'> r e rs t l.· · .. 1)e---· ,. (-q{,,, .vr•�-·ry< ,.. co... ,, ��r Ftif,., ,,e<-·,. :. , 1.\P· ,• (?YY',, &..H;\. il,, , )an,i·}·,, S'tun:nw rv dF f,f-{;, { ·,) '1]1;{i1r1({ C)["f(1(),<:;:,- }'ftYl t<:�_,.,qf,,, " '_Pr.__1.t __{: ,f._i v-,,l, .s-1-·1 tdJ{ __cs •• •,, �il_·,, ·\, _·:/;1< i. fP,,,_ (_; t1.. ..t. ( ·.vt,J �.,71 [_ . ,',vc_ 7- ' .11P1.-.?- J -\' ,.;1:·o,, ,v ,f -,' Th_,,._ ('. .._ f , ,. ,,t. _., ,. • ,, , .J •·.) >, �/' ••• · , ,.)(,, ...... -_ . _ .., . 1 · 1 1 Scarcfi f(J.v ..An thony Jofrns o'n s setJlrnne nl: on '\:ir'irinia \ Ta. tern Sfiore; ' ...ne a r -w:✓iere stood· an olc{ huusc." Late. 18' i j° .. > . f .. . ✓ 1 1 1 ) . \_,. •:• fl-,. M.-, ' -- . ) · '-. .. . - . . , .-,,,1 , ,.... · · - - .!· '(:) 11 f11Y\. }, t-. );)/(<,,,,,,1· 1-Vf'.J v•. . ,.,_Vi'.i, -'J. !vif.[,_,1-..,h r{f�,i ..,1 ,n,M 1;� ,' '-,P-f• ;l-�Uiif-,.t,nU!-, l::}',, lMl -(t-�,"Pl!/t.1f{�dw /"•''/l'' {:-J/')'•(: '•· "'Ai .1,' ,<,.,;;/.!Jp } 0v·1/'ht·(1( lft'.O nF 1-•j'.t,a Ti•i f;··vu/, ,, -i-- 1 - 111 ]);- , ) ·,,�,-{: (f�1 -�21.·"!-'1, ./I J_f1'. ,:_)_',•·-P ·1.- .J - - _J. - - · - �., · · · }; ..t' T !,,.,C t.. i,,. >�> '-.} f •-�- ., t �,: �· IUtW.tdJI( _ VVJ-�.,C , .... •i .n « , __ p ✓ 1 . L· ✓ ' · , .,, , · ,r-, 1� . ,/' l/)'Y! i...\ 'f--r»ct ,p ,p,• t �.;,-- ..,r · ,J.>ou·iy{arf l(,:; Jr : r.''-jafi •ee••f'f,l (' ·rn. f.wi. ··» "''.? � (; ,. fj ;I�( ✓··,;r1, nc, ✓'LU'll'f'· ')-ffit re -jn J'U.' ,..i _·'F "(A' ,/""> i " /'.l ,\'.. mafT (i{I, . e.. .\ - or. < fn.e. .. U _\.{-:'. �. . t-1,-... . �. (. f. H .. U(, ... } . _, t, , f:...... L .L i_'. , .. t ·.. . . :Jf. ... , ...J. ,, ,. .�i . , U/\�jl'·:J ... c (,;, } , ... ,. ·.:' t .. , ,... ··• ' ' ,.-.. ·.. ,.� f l [ . l,, •,. / , .. , I • . , ->t.ppafr1.cfiian J\:l o1l'!'1 ta in ·sl(y1es: Cfian11es in . '4 lht·udc?s, c·,:ianges' i:n .Atti.tud;?s; 1,-1.ter-R.fver'i'ne 'P1:·ehi.storic Se ttfornent

·1.· ..., . ,j, .. ()'Vl,J ✓ ' '),'I,'! 1 , .., • · .. {l '//'''' . · .. . . · 1 ri 1 . ,vp ,;i ·11 ··�) J , ) ,:,'( .l t,_ . '·'/• ; ' ' , I� ., (", ,•,,yr ,{" .."i , ✓ 'J". ) Fl· i,- ., t 1.'.,! ,t-f .. ., 1 :: 'P rf'✓ 'l ' --1 /'l · ·., --' U. f;,U ,'V) wl " ,,,,,J i,}_j · C ,.. '\, ,, .. . t,i{ r 1 (A, .. /-'l! ,: ... v,. ,. __,·--u .. ·.,t .. f/1,1. . 1. 1 ( ,.., \,L .., ,. . { ! � /,_ , Ni f.. /.. (1 ,(;{/t.)• ( ._.1"..-''!' .. r·r. _---,'· ,f,J. .. ',V.P, , . , ·1.. :,. 1,J, ,_· -i·'.•'l 'l 1 ·· (i]S an MIDDLE ATLANTIC :tes '-Unseen, '.E:Y:CiXFaUno Sites: ]\;u{dllnff 'l.�pstreiA.Tn: ..:A-tud;.:� (S' n ...... ·· .. · . 1 . . · - · . , - , . ARCHAEOLOGICAL n n _t i t·'\1,1,.,1•·i, ;,1.,-tp.....l1...... •tf. · '�•,:f- -t_,_ ,p� , 1 f { ,: ,-, r �. ! 1t· � 1-v.-·, 1, · ,p :))C·· ,,.t {,,.,fd1 -y ;) , • , - it, ,1••,, " [· {;:,o 'f'1✓ , 1·:., 1,, ,·v , /f"'.r.l ;."-1 rt,<"f,·--1-T$, ,,.),,. ;i:vi.. ,· vt'.fJ....,.l. . ,. .. ,..,.,.. ?_ - < .. � ,. 1.,-t,...,/.,,;.C-, �...... i, . ,._vi. Vi.-:..- ..L\..l> .. ri,-�:., .... Vi, 1 1lt/ ,.,,!• • (, t'k /V !1t.t (� .,,.,.. J, ,,.},/L,,,r..:,� .. • t. .., 1 •.. •�- f .. . "' {.. ,.., ,./ ;,., ... ..I'. ,, .. . i-< ,. , ... � ,. . ./t ·'1 " . . . . . ·. . . . {. ✓-o-,,. . . .. -;, ' tD,�v ,1·•0 , 1 .. ,,_>t:> •y• ;., .. {. .,., ..( , 'T/fJ) , ·d-i '"-) /"i- :r ;: ;, · , ,) v .,,r,11-• •,•,-, i. � t ,_, "')C' r·., f f; c, . . ✓_ ), . , ..... J; t r --· h. Cf.L, ---· {';·· f. , } i. Unu.;; ··,.1tt, -VL ,t.U i. �· (Jr,; 'i-,,j_,r.,J,n t ,_.t,, ¥ .:: u , q ,;1 thi. · t 1• t..,,(L•L ,) 1, /,;, (,U.. ,. .•:·,Vit-,}. flii_t.. :,. p· ,· ..•i,{) t_ J:·_, - �;- ;.,; / :!,;;;;;;;;;;:;;;::;:::;::;;;;;;::;;;;::;;::::::;:;:::;;;;:;;;;;;;;:;;;;:;;;;;;::::::=::::::::;;;:;;;;;;;;;;;;;;J .

✓ · ..Ar cliaeof�JBY at :.Mount' ):er.non: ,.A '.l)escr(pti:ve .'4na{:11sLs <-f the 'JJvoe-ra:rn '.�;- ->J.5e�·-{; f;y_-;-mera · .. �:'lskJnp the -],,.-_-'{..'>_ ?r .r. -. J__ .:, , . ·,-,·:1 ,_, '{?f. _-,,� '.\., (.,_; ,i 1. t . {i/.. >, (j_'},.-.·d,..· ,1 ,,vv:i·r, J.·.{.-'.' '1.:1 i •,: i_}..·',Y _',L,,T '1,r.;· (,),A 4. ...i,__ 1[;! . i.·n, . . __ _, ··•tl([,> t'"'·Vh ,, {; 'f">),')'"' (''/,; C � .. f ,, "l r· �:. t·- 1,, +· \ t h •; , l Y d,,1q,i. , 1.H l.-'} {r, -;} "' () . 1. ( 1,(-.'.. - {,__ ) · · , ,,,,, ,1 f wt � ,.5- ,-,1,, {, (.) �- } (1 r,1 �} Vv.,s:.- \.,, I t. l.:' ,,.· ,(-,, -'-p •·f. <;,, J .... · n J,,(.;{... 'k ,-...;. ty{j " ..;;::... ,. t<1/t.,t,-;.,.,,-,l J,_1',-', [A">:i,i.Y11. ('� ;'f; ., 'J"'Jft..to., i t ";(.\·o.�. n-C·�.� ., (_(-,,r· }·',V rt ,,t·H.,;;, ·";') .. ,p.l) U, ·rf,,,;",;,. {· J:f --.\,'/)·,. ,,{{,',,t,((,n.., ,,_,,'f _:._,·_ ( ·nvf �� {�- l, _ _6 :._? ...! < .. 1 ( -:,.,.,.,,, .. ... -, (',i ·>"' f •YJ/J/ !:.,/J , 1·,,./ , i,:i, <'f-',. , f,-�],C ,. ... r ( , ✓.1,{,(;·� ·t,I:. (' 7'/<{_ [·i •)r f',yi,·✓tF)r ,' 'c i T J 1·· ·,:r.•n'.,r;c·. (){; c/)'•�, ,-,1,;,, .�n.·' .._J,-� f(,- ,, rf'r··rfv l:\'c ·,jT(..·• n,·r nTrn. h (UV.:;( .... l:., i t �L\'! ,)'.:A,J. � •t, 1;.� .. � ,, L , ..... L,A .·. V �-( .. .1 .A '' ' ).• I- '• ·' ;:) f-1,/ , ,i, / ....,c t i'{,,-t i. U,; ,) L ..1- ' ., ,j �r ., L,.,1, -,. ,d f 1 ·,_ - 1 ;Pl· y · J 1 f •W •' . , , •· [ c :},('iVi Tl:;,,r -,, '(I/; (YVi (; rJ;f/1.e ')Hvti 'ri (,?,,, ;P- 0{, '"/'· )}'1 1(' ' . Jr J. ' - .....,1 . t ,} ; , , Jt ,.__,; C,.:.f� --�� . 1/l.. .. ., , ·� I ,.t {) , ,, ,,. .v. . ,'· 'R,;i·V( l : lt:)n, �- ·\, (,{n:J- I1/,,!,,,,i ·1 6t.!hveen c.:.; oose ()·eeli.and .\ efae n lsltind:- .A[cokee.fi .. f � . ; ,··-• .,,. 'J ' 1 .} {') ,·, ·1 · "1/) (} {; .. ,t. . _,,., � 1 , : 1 /; ' j"'£: >·' ') l- ,-� ·nr-" f-{.,;p <',."Jc ·il'()'M·Ja.. ,., ( ,� f"'-v✓n 'tr:1 v•. -T( (,?. 'f :·t'�. . .,·v,; '"i! ..; , "/ · ·11-· ' '' ! {. P c·,.,·+:.Y •i n d ''.t''}fi v·'(.' ,u· ·-:,: {J. ),.- n. '· , fjr;'1 (.'f... {··· -·, ,'n fFv1 · L: f (.g;_,k.,, ll.... ,!.tC,t,Ci{_tJ _\1. (,,.,,.. .. , ,. ir•. . . J..h.. 1, .. C � ... rt.,.. . ,-.. l.A. 1;�'. J. .. i c.\. , ..,. ; 1. _,, ., · ctc,,C .•.. .!...J Lvt. ! d.)· t-,,.3', ...... _.> 1._ t � ._ v,. r t .n. ... '","'.· ' .. . , , ,...... , .. ,, <,1.. •.• t. _,j · ' · · ,- .. 1 i ,�cp . .. " ✓ ✓ , - . ,t.) •. v.L- >,,.) , \,.... v f.. ..,,· , ...... / ,3.. � \ .. �- ,., \ •. -1 V �.- 1 �rp ''(t.,)t t �,; i,v,.;, .;:J• , ···-u · tFh d )-V'�: ·"'{) T1 J· �.. 1�/1 {�, ') r \)·1, {;J{,V✓ J ; t,�_,i � ;fs-)·· 1• 'f\ 1-v:)[/' u'P1 J .....,n�. ,1,i i .. · t 1,v �· �d- ,..' :1, f- - � -.. 1<.i't/ .1 t � �- r? (.. , y ..... ,..,. r .. �:J ii..� i.:! (f --r1'. h� p·i(, -if11 17 lfi_> 'i\)tcr;.na,.·� :� Y' Jf(. ;n-;··h 1 'ft vc,.:)l (• i1rts-;i��, ��-t y\j ... f ..J ,�::- J· , ·•,'pJ '1 }'Yr f · . ' ✓ ., . l < .. ' - -:;{ {) '1'/ . , ..t ' , . ' ✓ .. , {>•• 1 ,-; (',, ,· ·f , I <'JJ[ ti r·:., '· ·i , ) (-c... � , ..·� _vJ· i, .; :p ·, ' -i-/- \ i : .:· '}rr;;-q:. c:i ,..({j l ,p ') ,I, . :; ·:) r.'l," ,-f�, [,,,, ; · { (1 ,) J' '"t� \v /) ·l; .1'<, ', -{ ;'Pt} v · ' f: -p O ,·• !; .: ·-- , f { 11 VI,:i. L1 I,A,( nCt.. ..."!U -£Jtf{.,S,_· [f,/1 ... ·,?f vf,.1 ,.,.,· f,. rJi(,l. l,1,,,tU. ':J 1 C.h , •.,,,, . t. f .. d. ' (,, ,.__ ,,., , n,, .. v,,,,._,t (,n.( l<-J ,. / .. , ...... (,<.·., ,.- L �., (.r,,-1,.,,,. ,. Jr/...... , ,., ; ·f.,.(Jl,, .-.'u.,,.- hi- r, ,.. , ! ,,J{ ,/l (,,r .on .. , '. ' · - - ' - - Ihne (!f' D-ust: 'Pa {i-.ioindi.ans ani,{ Loess (}fl tfie �.Eastern Shore of :klan-tlixnd; l?ey() nd Status and· C'onq.. n1 u .�r Befi.avior: . ·1 . - )I s '.PrL_r_ti_ ssion.s in ,.'J fil,-.. s {,·,. wfcc, .. ,?. {, . • _,·..�'l-,,v-(. -..fi vrp· ,C tl,•,(A.,v:{._�i)rv �· ' ' {if:. e -rny _fu1 n ··i': ..Ar cha, C"onnnunities Jdi.' nLiU.es ot the c·.erneterv: Some Ini,pficaJ it"n 1s -?fru:an-Ir MARCH 23 -25, 2001 OCEAN CITY,

l �PaJterns -usi:nB -Phase 1 ._::1rchoeoihffi✓caI 7JaLa; .(The :T'ina[ fronti er·: .�pace, 7'i'rne) and Cosrnofr�HY in L;rtc. �erehLs'"oru.· f Sou,riwesiern :Pennsy(vania; "Ifie .. An_af\Jsis' (f· a (it.i.i(/£n-'r:L5tge,{C'h·i,ppt:ng C'fitst'erf1'-oni 4-.1{iV18; .. A.stri::tZ'eneca sue 2 t;-Jv('..r l).. 55): ,y [ 1d 1 {-.. . S'. . h-1 tf �p fa J j ) d t 1 i :E i t C C 1 � ✓ ., .. ... _ , ✓ , ,;J i :J. ·"1JJt,{). l-V � ·,1 s, , v .f' ;✓ fc l ., "'r·!A,�-f,, ,) > . i-nc·n · :;; ') r ,tm i•JJJ''\ � xa:n1 :n a n .o1· ures m --1 J(('J e?..l y - i -./ t,, , .. I� •. , , c ,. _;,/ ,it,· iLt .. t l ., ., , . t t.. ... , t. , ·, c . C .� , _,. , ... • _ Ci, . , , .. r,.i ,, .'1 fo _. ..C:. , , -�· :: ' ((t- .. J. � Jft '(Pn U:1e 0 . l., lV-ilTia-rnson Pa{t:? .oind1.0 11 Site in 1.)i.n:wi,Jdie Coirrtty_t 'Virgi:n ia. Patrick O'Neill, Parsons Engineering Science, patrick.o'[email protected] Edward Otter, Salisbury State University, [email protected]

Philip Perazio, Kittatinny Archaeological Research, Inc., [email protected] 31 ANNUAL MEETING OF THE 5T MIDDLE ATLANTIC ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE Matthew Reeves, Montpelier Foundation, mrccvcs@ montpelicr.org Richard Sacchi, FairfaxCount y Park Authority, [email protected] MARCH 23-25, 2001 Douglas Sanford, Mary Washington College, [email protected]

Dwayne Scheid, Mount Vernon Archaeology Department, PRINCESS ROYALE HOTEL [email protected] OCEAN CITY, MARYLAND Peter Siegel, John Milner Associates, [email protected]

Dean R. Snow, The State University, drs [email protected]

Faye Stocum, Delaware Historic Preservation Office, [email protected] OFFICERS AND ORGANIZERS Lee Tippett, Department of Historic Resources, [email protected]

George Tolley, U.S. Forest Service, [email protected] PRESIDENT , EDWARD OTTER Kirsti Uunila, Jefferson Patterson Park and Museum, [email protected] PRESIDENT-EL�CT MICHAEL BARBER Daniel Wagner, Geo-Sci Consultants, Inc., [email protected] TREASURER John S. Wah, University of Maryland, jw291 @umail.umd.edu CAROL EBRIGHT

Jesse Walker, Temple University, [email protected] RECORDING SECRETARY DOUGLAS SANFORD

Robert Wall, Towson State University, [email protected] MEMBERSHIP SECRETARY FAYE STOCUM Jeanne Ward, Applied Archaeology and History Associates, Inc., [email protected] BOARD MEMBER AT LARGE DAVID MUDGE

JOURNAL EDITOR ROGER MOELLER

PROGRAM CHAIRPERSONS ELIZABETH CROWELL CAROLE NASH

ARRANGEMENTS CHAIRPERSON KURT CARR

27 Laura Galk:, .faryland Archaeological Conservation Laboratory, MIDDLE ATLANTIC ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE gal ·[email protected] William Gardner, Catholic University, [email protected] March 23 - 25, 2001 Ocean City, Maryland James Gibb, [email protected] Charles Goode, Catholic University, [email protected] PROGRAM Ned Heite, Heite Consulting, [email protected] I Friday Afternoon, March 23 Philip Hill, Archeological Testing and Consulting, Inc., [email protected]

Session l: Prehistoric Settlement Patternsin Up land Settings Christine Jirikowic, Gunston Hall Plantation, [email protected] Kurt Carr and Patricia Miller, Organizers and Chairs Michael Johnson, County Archaeological Services, l :00 - l :05 Patricia Miller [email protected] Introduction William Johnson, Michael Baker Jr., Inc., [email protected] 1:05-1 :25 Kurt W. Carr Douglas C. Kellogg, John Milner Associates, Th e Development of Prehistoric Settlement [email protected] l :25 - l :45 BeverlyPattern Research A. Chiarulli Priorities in Pennsylvania Robert K.ingsley, John Milner Associates, [email protected] Up land Sites in Th e Conemaugh-Blacklick Michael Klein, Mary Washington College, [email protected] I :45 - 2:05 PhilipWa tershed A. Perazio and William J. Meyer Dorothy Schlotthauer Krass, Society forAmerican Archaeology, Th e Conodoguinet [email protected] PeterWa tershed E. Siegel, Dougl�s C. Kellogg, Robert G. Kingsley 2:05 - 2:25 Darrin Lowery, H), L. Temple University, [email protected] Jennifer Marston, Brandywine Creek Wa tershed (Watershed Chester, URS, rabbit6 I I @hoimail.com 2:25 - 2:35 Lancaster,Patricia Miller and Delaware Counties, Pennsylvania John P. McCarthy, Greenhorne and O'Mara, [email protected] Summary of the Up land Settlement Pattern Studies Bernard K. Means, Alexandria Archaeology, 2:35 - 2:45 Kurt Carr [email protected] Final Remarks 2:45 - 3:05 Dean Snow, William Meyer, Kittatinny Archaeological Research, Inc., [email protected] Patricia Miller, 3:05 - 3:20 Break Discussant KCI Technologies, Inc., [email protected] David Mudge, New Jersey Department of Transportation, arky

Architecture at James Fort 26 PARTICIPANTS ' AFFILIA TIONS 3:40 - 4:00 Matthew Emerson Th e Search fo r Anthony Johnson's AND EMAIL ADDRESSES Settlement on Virginia's EasternShore

4:00 -4:20 Patrick L. O'Neill " ... near where stood an old house. " - A Nancy H. Anthony, Greenhorne and O'Mara, Inc., [email protected] Late I 8 Century Delaware Brick Clamp th Joe Baker, Indiana University of Pennsylvania/Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, [email protected] 4:20 - 4:40 Michael Clem Plantation Landscapes: Making Practical Use of the Information Provided Michael B. Barber, USDA Forest Service, [email protected] 4:40 -5:00 Lynn-Marie Wieland An Attempt to Reconstruct Political William Barse, URS Corporation, [email protected] Boundaries In Eighteenth Century Ridgefield, Connecticut: David Bibler, KCI Technologies, Inc., [email protected] Where is my Farm?

Bradley Bowden, Gray and Pape, Inc., [email protected] Friday Evening, March 23

Varna Boyd, Greenhorne and O'Mara, vboyd @g-and-o.com 8:00 Awards Tammy Bryant, Catholic University, tammy203 @juno.com Saturday Morning, March 24 Kurt Carr, Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission, [email protected] Edward Chaney, Jefferson Patterson Park and Museum, Session 3: Take Me A way From the River: An Examination of Inter-riverine [email protected] Prehistoric Settlement in Virginia Bradley Bowden, Organizer and Chair Beverly A. Chiarulli, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] 8:00 - 8:20 Michael B. Barber Small Sites on the Appalachian Mountain Michael Clem, Thunderbird Archaeological Associates/American University, [email protected] Slopes: Changes in Altitudes, Changes in Attitudes

Elizabeth Crowell, Parsons Engineering Science, 8:20 - 8:40 Bradley Bowden Inter-Riverine Prehistoric Settlement [email protected] Patterning in the Richmond Area: Alternative Research Methods and Comparative Data Kevin Cunningham, Delaware Department of Transportation, [email protected] 8:40 - 9:00 Mike Johnson Interior Small Stream and Upland Prehistoric Eric Deetz, APV A/University of Leicester, [email protected] Site Patterns in Fairfax County - GIS Modeling and Interpretations Joe Dent , American University, [email protected] 9:00 -9:20 Michael J. Klein Discovering Sites Unseen, Exca vating Unforeseen Sites Joshua Duncan, Mary Washington College, [email protected]

Carole Ebright, Maryland State Highway Association, [email protected] 9:20 - 9:40 Carole Nash Paddling Upstream: Models and the Importance of Interriverine Sites Matt Emerson, Southern Illinois University, [email protected] 9:40 - 9:50 Lee Tippett, Discussant John Foss, Soils International, Inc., [email protected] 9:50 - 10:00 Break

25 2 Session 4: Public Archaeology phase. Utilizing what is known about the age and distribution of key trade items as David Bibler, Organizer and Chair well as the Susquehannock sequence fromsout h central Pennsylvania, a chronology forthe Susquehannock settlement of the upper Potomac Valley during the early fur I 0:00 - 10:20 Kevin Cunningham Connecting People and Our Past Th e trade period is suggested. This should serve to clarify the vague historical record Public, Cultural Resources and the Delaware Department of pertaining to early contact in the upper Potomac. Transportation Ward, Jeanne A. I 0:20 - 10:40 Dorothy Schlotthauer Krass and Beverly A. Chiarulli Th e Archaeology of the Burlington Friends Meetinghouse, Burlington, New Jersey: Enhancing Public Views of Archaeology: Initiatives from the Belief, Behavior, and Continuityin a Religious Community SAA Public Education Committee Proposed construction of a regional conferencecenter at the Friends' Meetinghouse th 10:40 - 11:00 Joe Baker City Island 1994 to 2000: A Retrospective in Burlington New Jersey threatened the reported site of the original 17 century meetinghouse. Archaeological investigations were undertaken to locate and 11:0 0 - 11:2 0 Varna G. Boyd and John P. McCarthy A Critical Perspeciive identify the site and then to recover structural information and sample associated on "Hands-on " Education/Volunteer Programming: Case artifactsprior to the site's destruction. The building was revealed to have originally Studies.from Cultural Resources Management been a hexagon in plan to which a rectangular addition was appended. This paper presents the history of the site, describes the excavations, and the results of artifact 11:2 0 - 11:40 Dwayne Scheid Public Archaeology at Mount Vernon: A analyses, including depositional analysis and analysis of the ceramics recovered. Descriptive Analysis of the Program's Development The discussion is grounded in an attempt to present an analysis of the behaviors and values represented, particularly in the context of Friends' beliefs and religious 11:40 - 12:00 Matthew Reeves Asking the Right Questions: Archaeologists practices and the special functions of the Burlington Meetinghouse as a regional and Descendent Communities center of Friends activity reflecting continuity in belief and behavior over 300 years.

I Saturday Afternoon, March 24 Wieland, Lynn-Marie An Attempt To Reconstruct Political Boundaries In Eighteenth Century Ridgefield, ? Session 5: Archaeology in the Va lley: From Headwaters to Connecticut: Where is my Farm Tidewater (and in between .... ) Lithic analyses documents 8000 years of Native American occupation in and Tammy Bryant, John Mullen, Bill Gardner, and Joe Dent, Organizers and around Ridgefield, Connecticut. Archaeological evidence suggests that some sites Chairs were used fromthe Early Archaic through the Early Historic Period. Although sites and artifacts are relatively abundant for Archaic and Woodland periods, the Early I :00 - I :20 Robert Wall and Heather Lapham Material Culture of the Historic Period is only represented by bits and pieces of glass, lead musket balls, Contact Period in the Upper Potomac Valley: Chronological and and an occasional bit of metal. Consequently, we have come to rely on the property CulturalImp lications deeds between the European settlers and the Native Americans in the Connecticut/New York border region to give us an idea of how the Native I :20 - 1:40 Tammy Bryant Archaeological Overview of Recent Excavations Americans, the Dutch, and English dealt with one another and their political 011 the Potomac River Floodplain from Goose Creek to the River boundaries. These deeds also document the confusing political agendas of the Channel Back of Selden Island Province of New York and the Colony of Connecticut.

I :40 - 2:00 John Mullen On the Pleistocene Terrace Back of Selden Island

2:00 - 2:20 John E. Foss and Daniel P. Wagner Soils of the Te rrace Sequence along the Potomac River, Loudoun County, Virginia

3 24 during the Pleistocene/Holocene transition. Lifted by wind from drying mud bars, 2:20 - 2:40 Charles Goode and William M. Gardner Observations on the silty material was broadly spread over adjacent uplands to form a surface Early Woodland Ceramics and Points from Deep Excavations in mantle as much as 2 m thick near Chesapeake Bay but thinning to <50 cm by 30 km the Virginia Potomac River Floodplain between Goose Creek to the east. Although no concerted effort has been undertaken to relate loessial and Selden Island soils and Paleoindian sites, a l 0,520 BP date forone buried surfaceargues that the deposition of loess was concurrent with Paleoindian occupation. Additionally, 2:40 - 2:50 Break recent shoreline surveys have recovered Clovis artifacts from subsoil levels or loessial soils. Together, these findings suggest that unlike the near-surface context 2:50 -3:10 Richard J. Dent and Christine A. Jirikowic Accokeek Creek: formost Paleoindian sites in the central Delmarva, those closer to Chesapeake Bay Chronology and the Complex are likely to occur at or below the deeper levels of strongly developed argillic horizons previously assumed to be culturally sterile. Usual shovel testing may 3: IO - 3:30 William P. Barse The Fletchers Boathouse Site and Its Place in therefore not be adequate to identify many Paleoindian sites. Archaeological Potomac Va lley Prehistory investigative approaches should be modified for loessial soils, and the distribution of loess deposits throughout the Middle Atlantic and Northeast more thoroughly 3:30 - 3:50 William C. Johnson Who Were Th ose Gals? Cordage Twist documented. Direction wid Ethnicity in the Potomac River Basin, Preliminary Evidence Suggesting Population Continuity Followed by Walker, Jesse Replacement during the Late Woodland Period Investigation of a Shell Midden ( J 8D0220) on Maryland'sEastern Shore 3:50 - 4:10 Jennifer Marston and William P. Barse Reconstructing a Recent investigations at l 8DO220 have revealed intact stratified archaeological Middle Woodland Household Vessel Assemblage deposits associated with the Terminal Archaic through the Contact periods. The site is located in a tidal marsh setting within the Choptank River Basin in Maryland. 4:10-4:15 Break Rising sea levels and tidal wetland formation have persevered cultural deposits in a saturated context. The large quantity of faunal remains recovered from shoreline collections and excavations attest to an enhanced state of preservation. The site has never been plowed. Townsend, Killens, and Hell Island ceramic types have been Session 6: Contributed Papers -- Prehistoric Archaeology recovered from the shell deposits. Soil horizons below the shell midden contain Josh Duncan, Chairperson Dames Quarter ceramics and stemmed projectile points. Contact period artifacts have been exposed from the uppermost portion of the shell midden. The effects of 4:15 - 4:35 Josh Duncan Mobility and Sedentism in the Northern Neck, AD shoreline erosion and redeposition have dramatically altered the cultural deposits. 1500-1 700

Wall, Robert and Heather Lapham 4:35 -4:55 Nancy H. Anthony and Michael F. Johnson Tool Production Material Culture of the Contact Period in the Upper Potomac Va lley: at the Lorton To wn Center Complex Chronological and Cultural Implications 4:55 -5:15 Jesse Walker Investigation of a Shell Midden ( I8D0220) on A synthesis of Contact Period material culture from the upper Potomac Valley is Maryland'sEastern Shore presented. This compilation of data from such sites as Herriot Farm, Pancake Island, and the Barton site includes artifacts of European manufacture or trade 5:15 - 5:35 Daniel Wagner, Darrin L. Lowery, John E. Foss, and John goods, and aboriginal ceramics. Ceramics are predominantly affiliated with S. Wah A Time of Dust: Paleoindians and Loess on the Eastern Susquehannock cultures dating from the late 1500s to the mid-I 600s. European Shore ofP. Maryland manufactured trade goods from the upper Potomac Valley sites include predominantly items of copper or brass and glass beads. The Susquehannock sequence begins with the Schultz phase and extends into the Washington Boro

4 23 will discuss the past, present and future of public archaeology at Mount Vernon. It Saturday Evening, March 24 will also examine how these programs have enhanced the public's understanding of 7:00 - 8:00 Business Meeting archaeology and Eighteenth-Century lifeways.

8:00 - 12:00 Reception Siegel, Peter E., Douglas C. Kellogg and Robert G. Kingsley Brandywine Creek Watershed (Watershed H), Chester, Lancaster, and Delaware Counties, Pennsylvania I Sunday Morning, March 25 A review was conducted of the Pennsylvania Archaeological Site Survey (PASS) file data forpreh istoric sites, as well as all cultural resource survey reports for the Session 7: The Historical Archaeology of Identity and Meaning Brandywine Creek watershed. In particular, sites were examined with regard to John McCarthy, Organizer and Chair topographic settings, chronological components, lithic distributions, and discovery methods. The goal of this research was to evaluate the watershed model developed 8:00 - 8:05 John McCarthy Introduction by the PHMC ( 1996) in response to legislative pressure forthe Commonwealth to perform state-permitted archeological surveys. Further, expectations were 8:05 - 8:25 James Gibb Beyond Status and Consumer Behavior: developed from the existing data with regard to sensitive topographic settings for Professions in Historical Archaeology prehistoric sites. Results of this research indicate that, given uneven data quality and reporting standards, it is problematic to establish policy. Recommenda_tions for 8:25- 8:45 Ed Chaney and Kirsti Uunila "It's like my fa mily ": Using further research include drainage-wide probabilistic surveys to obtain Archaeology to Create Identity representative �amples of site distributions. Such surveys will serve as a baseline against which the PASS-file data may be compared. 8:45 - 9:05 John McCarthy Individual and Communities Identities at the Cemetery: Some Implications of African-Influenced Burial Tolley, George A. Practices in Antebellum Philadelphia Th e Analysis of a Guilford_Aged Chipping Clusterfr om 44GY18 During the last two weeks of July, 2000, the George Washington and Jefferson 9:05 - 9:25 Ned Heite Genealogy as an Auxiliary Science to Archaeology National Forests sponsored a joint Archeological Society of Virginia Certification Field School and Passports in Time Project at the Fairwoods Livery Site (44GYI 8) 9:25 - 9:45 Jeanne A. Ward The Archaeology of the Burlington Friends in Grayson County, Virginia. This is the second field school the forests have Meetinghouse in Burlington, New Jersey: Belief, Behavior and sponsored to investigate the prehistoric use of Mount Rogers rhyolite at this site. Continuity in a Religious Community. This paper will address the results fromthe analysis of a Guilford aged chipping cluster that was discovered during this latter field school. This chipping cluster, 9:45 - I 0:00 Discussion unique to the site at this time, contained two Guilford projectile points with more than one hundred pieces of rhyolite debitage, flakes, and core fragments. The 10:00 - 10: 10 Break analysis of this material will be concentrated on identifying the variety of rhyolite pieces that formed this chipping cluster, any tools or utilized flakes within the cluster, and identify, if possible, particular knapping techniques utilized by the Contributed Papers -- Prehistoric Archaeology Session 8: Guilford people. Richard Sacchi, Chair

10:10- 10:30 Laura Galke Inferring Prehistoric Settlement Patterns Using Wagner, Daniel P., Darrin L. Lowery, John E. Foss and John S. Wah Phase I Archaeological Data A Time of Dust: Paleoindians and Loess on the Eastern Shore of Maryland Extensive deposits of loess on Maryland's Eastern Shore were presumably derived from glacial sediments carried to the region by the pre-tidal Susquehanna River

5 22 Perazio, Philip A. and William J. Meyer Bernard K. Means Th e Final Frontier: Space, Time, and Th e Conodoguinet Wa tershed Cosmology in late Prehistoric Southwestern Pennsylvania 10:30 - 10:50 A review of data was conducted for the Conodoguinet watershed, one of the two George A. Tolley Th e Analysis of a Guilfo rd Aged Chipping exempted watersheds in central Pennsylvania. It was found that the existing Cluster from 44GYJ8 database is insufficient to address basic questions regarding chronology, site type, 10:50-1 1:10 and site distribution. This was the result of two factors - small sample size and the Douglas C. Kellogg AstraZeneca Site 2 (7NC-B-55): An poor quality of data available on the majority of sites. Important research questions Unplowed Up land Site in the Delaware Piedmont that could be addressed if adequate data were available fromthe watershed include: 11:10-11:30 1) whether chert was procured from local bedrock sources; 2) the possible role of Phillip J. Hill A Preliminary Examination of Cores Swface this watershed in the transhipment of rhyolite fromsources to the south into the Collected from the Williamson Paleoindian Site in Dinwiddie upper Susquehanna drainage; and 3) the role of environmental variables in I 1:30-11:50 County, Virginia influencing upland settlement patterns in different portions of the watershed. Among the recommendations for changes to the survey priorities policy was to focussurvey efforts on wooded areas or long-fallow fields near key resource zones.

Reeves, Matthew Asking the Right Questions: Archaeologists and Descendent Communities Archaeologists often interview and work with people descended from the historical population they are studying. Many times the descendent groups provide the archaeologist with exciting information regarding the family history and the location of structures at the site. Descendents' participation_in the research project also gives the research a degree of authority by providing a concrete connection between the past and present. While researchers clearly benefit from their relationship with descendent groups, the relevance to the descendent group is not always so clear. Today's researchers are faced with the challenge of making their research relevant to the descendent communities. Using examples fromfield work in Jamaica and the American South, the author will provide suggestions for how research carried out between descendent communities and social scientists can be beneficial forboth.

Scheid, Dwayne Public Archaeology at Mount Vernon: A Descriptive Analysis of the Program's Development The goals, of the Mount Vernon Ladies' Association Archaeology Program, for its volunteers and the public, are to increase the understanding of archaeological methods and to promote a greater appreciation of the lives of George Washington, his family, employees and slaves. This paper looks at the programs that are generally considered to be part of public archaeology. Mount Vernon has a volunteer program that creates opportunities to learn while pursuing professional research. In addition to the volunteer focus, public archaeology at Mount Vernon also includes both formal and informal educational outreach programs. This paper

6 I 21 Mullen, John On the Pleistocene Te rrace Back of Selden Island

SYMPOSIUM ABSTRACTS Phase I excavations on a Pleistocene terrace in Loudoun County, Virginia, uncovered a continuous scatter of artifacts. Among the sites found was a Late Woodland hamlet containing Montgomery focus ceramics. While much is known about the floodplain communities of this time period, little is known about these Prehistoric Settlement Patterns in Up land Settings terrace sites. This paper will present an analysis of the artifacts from this site and Organizers: Kurt Carr and Patricia Miller relate it to other terrace hamlets reported but not studied in this locality and the area. In 1996 the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission, Bureau for Historic Preservation (BHP) issued The Development of Prehistoric Settlement Pattern Nash, Carole Research Priorities in Pennsylvania, a document that establishes a policy on the Paddling Up stream: Models and the Importance of lnterriverine Sites need for Phase I archaeological survey for compliance projects. The policy was developed to address the issue of the high cost and low return of Phase I surveys in Archaeological studies of prehistoric settlement in Virginia have long been upland terrain. For nineteen watersheds determined to have the highest quality of associated with hierarchical models in which riverine-based sites control the data on upland sites, Phase I surveys would be recommended only in riverine and interpretation of interriverine site types and functions, regardless of the level of certain other high probability settings. The Pennsylvania Archaeological Council social complexity. The site-based models, heuristic devices heavily dependent on _ (PAC) developed the upland settlement patterns project to address the need for a ethnographic analogy, assume a limited set of signatures for past human behav10rs. better understanding of the site data in low-priority watersheds so as to determine They have been criticized for their inability to incorporate ethnographically and what, if any, important research questions could be answered through additional historically documented variability in settlement and subsistence strategies, the archaeological survey. The project, which was funded by a Pennsylvania Historical practical implications of which are clear: the loss of a significant portion of our and Museum Commission Historic Preservation grant, studied three of the 19 archaeological database to a constraining model that minimizes the role of watersheds. In this symposium we will present a paper on the development of the interriverine sites in prehistoric settlement systems. This paper presents an policy, as well as papers on the results in each of the three watersheds. Dr. Dean overview of the nature of interriverine sites and the most frequently used models Snow of the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission will serve as through which they are studied by Virginia archaeologists. The theoretical and _ discussant. We hope that a discussion of management issues related to upland methodological implications of each model will be considered through the analysts prehistoric sites will follow. (Session 1) of a data set from the Inner Piedmont of central Virginia.

O'Neill, Patrick L. Take Me Away From the River: An Examination of Inter-riverine Prehistoric " ... near where stood an old house. " -A Late I 8th Century Delaware Brick Clamp Settlement in Virginia Organizer: Bradley Bowden A rural brick clamp complex was excavated during Phase III investigations on the SR- I Highway Corridor Project in southern New Castle County, Delaware. The With some notable exceptions, the majority of detailed prehistoric archaeological entire clamp complex was uncovered, consisting of a 2 x 2.5 m wide heat signature, research in Virginia has focused on large floodplain sites with Late Woodland a procurement/ mixing pit, and structural remains of a drying or processing components. Regional settlement pattern models have incorporated this data with canopy/shed. The extremely small size of the clamp indicates that the complex materialist theory and cross-cultural comparison of environmentally constricted could have probably produced only enough bricks for a foundation or chimney groups offering generalized evolutionary models in which a site's inferred feature. Information on non-brick artifacts and firing stages, quality of brick, and occupation duration and density degrades with its relative size, artifact diversity, the clamp complex features, will provide insight to this under-researched domain of and proximity to larger sites along major rivers. While these models are generally the late I 8th and early I 9th century Delaware rural landscape. Comparative analysis effective, more recent, largely CRM-based, research has recognized considerable of bricks, clamps, and small kilns from other regions will be presented to define regional, temporal, and apparent functional diversity in prehistoric technological process and adaptation in rural settings.

7 20 Individual and Communities Identities at the Cemetery: Some Implications of AfMcCarthy,rican-Influenced John Burial Practices in Antebellum Philadelphia use of inter-riverine settings. Although previous models have acknowledged a range of interior site types, archaeologists commonly wrestle with associating The archaeology of cemeteries deals with the graves of individuals whose identities specific sites with these types due to the often qualitative nature of the comparative in the past included, but were not limited to, membership in the communities in database. Additionally, there has been considerable variability in the level of effort which they lived and worked. African-American graves arc often anonymous in employed to examine these sites. The goal of this session is to review recent that we do not know the specific identity of the individual in the grave, only that archaeological research, discuss the successes and shortcomings of past method and they were members of a particular community or congregation. This paper theory, and generate local and regional research objectives concerning the considers the essential paradox of this relationship between the individual and the prehistoric use of low order streams in Virginia. community in the archaeology of cemeteries using examples drawn from the author's ongoing analysis of African-influenced burial practices at cemeteries used (Session 3) by the First AfricanBa ptist Church of Philadelphia. Archaeology in the Potomac River Valley: From Headwaters to Tidewater (and in between .... )

The Final Frontier: Space, Time, and Cosmology in Late Prehistoric SouthwesternMeans, Bernard PennsylvaniaK. Organizers: Tammy Bryant, John Mullen, William M. Gardner, and Joe DentArcha eologists began excavating sites along the Potomac River in the mid- to late­ The 1934 to 1940 Somerset County (Pennsylvania) Relief Excavations completely nineteenth century. Excavation activity peaked again in the mid-twentieth century revealed the community plans of several Late Prehistoric (A.O. 900 to A.O. 1400s) with the ascendancy of the New Archaeology, the establishment of active Monongahela village sites. While the few publications resulting from these archaeology programs in local universities, and the rise of cultural resources excavations were brief and largely descriptive, they were conducted systematically management. The results of all this research answered many questions about the and field results were thoroughly documented. These field data are examined in local prehistoric past, but in the process it also raised some new questions or terms of a general model of ring-shaped village organization that relies on spatial pointed to areas where our understanding was far from complete. Potomac River layouts determined through the differential distribution of archaeologica11y­ archaeology has within the past few years undergone somewhat of a renaissance recovered elements. The layout of ring-shaped Monongahela village s_ite represents concurrent with the investigation of a significant number of sites along its banks. an imago mundi, or image of the universe. An analysis of Monongahela village This symposium reports on recent archaeological research at sites from near the sites can reveal the various social, economic, political, and even cosmological western limits of the river, in the Piedmont, and further east along the Coastal Plain. factors influencing their layouts.

(Session 5) Summaryof the Upland Settlement Pattern Studies The Historical Archaeology of Identityand Meaning Miller, Patricia This paper will summarize the results of the upland settlement pattern study in terms of the assumptions of the survey priorities policy and the goals of the PAC TheOrganizer days of and histori Chair:cal archaeo John McClogy'sarthy role as "handmaiden to history" are long gone. project. The studies have provided detailed understandings of the site data in three Contemporary historical archaeology has come to focus in a large part on the ways of the exempted watersheds and on the degree to which these sites can contribute to that the material world reflects individual and community identities and was used to our understanding of settlement patterns. Whether other research issues can be create meaning in the everyday lives of people of the more recent past. This group addressed is problematical since upland sites are often plow disturbed -and have of papers demonstrates the range of theoretical and methodological approaches and very low artifact densities. Given the high cost of archaeological survey, upland substantive content that such studies in the Mid-Atlantic region now routinely terrain represents a challenge to resource managers who must prioritize limited encompass resources. (Session 7).

19 8 INDIVIDUAL PAPER ABSTRACTS Klein, Michael J. Discovering Sites Unseen, Excavating Unforseen Sites

Anthony, Nancy H. and Michael F. Johnson Archaeological research in the inter-riverine uplands requires archaeologists to Tool Production at the Lorton To wn Center Complex consider the probabilities of discovering differen! types of sites of as well as the identification of appropriate methods of sampling sites characterized by Within the proposed Lorton Town Center (LTC) development in Fairfax County, considerable variation in assemblage composition and spatial patterning. Virginia, in-depth data recovery was conducted at three interior prehistoric sites on Moreover, recognition of patterns at the regional, local, and site-specific levels secondary terraces adj acent to , and just above the Coastal appears critical for understanding and interpreting upland sites. Consequently, Plain/Piedmont physiographic boundary. Each site· was multi-component. The attention to both site-specific and regional databases is essential for interpretation entire complex produced artifacts representing the Paleo-Indian through Late of upland sites. This paper addresses these issues through an analysis of data from Woodland period. Concentrated tool production components from the Piscataway the southern Middle Atlantic Region. period were recovered from sites LTC- 1 and LTC-2. This paper will discuss the 1 tool making process and settlement pattern possibly evident therein, and will Krass, Dorothy Schlotthauer and Beverly A. Chiarulli address the broader cultural context of the LTC complex. Enhancing Public Views of Archaeology: Initiatives from the SAA Public Education Committee Baker, Joe City Island /994 to 2000: A Retrospective Television producers and magazine editors know that many people find archaeology to be an exotic and fascinating field. Archaeological information can Between 1994 and 2000, I participated in and directed the City Island Project, an be found in museums, in classrooms, in books and magazines and, increasingly, in annual public archaeology program co-sponsored by the Pennsylvania Historical open houses at excavations and on the Internet. What does the public learn about and Museum Commission and the City of Harrisburg. During that period the archaeology from alt these sources? How do we want the public to view our program steadily grew from a simple block excavation sheltered beneath . an old subject? These are questions that the Society for American Archaeology's Public military cook tent, into one of the largest and most popular public celebrations of Education Committee has examined for the past l O years. In this paper, we will the buried past in the Middle Atlantic region. My presentation will describe the discuss some of the answers we have found through the development of programs goals, history and evolution, structure, and accomplishments of the project to date, and publications, and through a national public opinion poll. as well as the role and importance of public outreach to the entire archaeological community. Marston, Jennifer and William P. Barse Reconstructing a Middle Woodland Household Vessel Assemblage Barber, Michael B. Small Si�es on the Appalachian Mduntain Slopes: Changes in Altitudes, Changes Analysis of rim sherds and larger body sherds recovered from the Middle in Attitudes Woodland pit features at the Fletchers Boathouse site show that a standard range of vessel shapes were employed by the former inhabitants of the site. Four distinct Thirty years ago in the mountainous area of western Virginia, no one expected to shape categories can be defined for Albemarle ware at the site, each with varying fi nd archaeological resources to be located above the floodplain and terrace degrees of popularity. These vessel shapes _are compared with available systems of maj or drainages. No one expected to find such higher elevation sites assemblages from other Middle Woodland sites to assess the degree of primarily because no one looked. Beyond a lack of research interest, standardization in household assemblages. These are compared with both Early archaeologists were not fond of hiking up the sides of mountains, battling through Woodland vessel assemblages and Late Woodland assemblages in the Potomac rhododendron jungles, green briar clear cuts, and bear habitat. Settlement pattern Valley to show trends in vessel shape and size through time. models, although mostly implicit, were constructed in such a manner that prehistoric peoples were believed to followm aj or rivers, never looking left nor right, and scllling for a low level life style. Unfortunately many of these sites have been referred to as "lithic scatters," a nomenclature devoid of cultural function,

9 18 County is uniquely suited for this kind of study. Data from adjacent Arlington time period, or humanness. It is noteworthy that these sites are usually County will be included. This paper will be an update to, and expansion of the concentrations of lithics, not scatters. In addition, they should be held in the excellent Late Archaic-Late Woodland model proposed by Gardner in the early framework of cultural function, not artifact type. Discussion on these "lithic 1980s. scatters" and other sites recorded culminated in settlement pattern models based on the Phase I inventories. After doggedly following the edicts of the models for a Johnson, William C. quarter century, information from added and more intensive survey and increased Who Were Those Gals? Cordage Twist Direction and Ethnicity in the Potomac testing has negated much of the power of the models of the past. New approaches River Basin: PreliminaryEvidence Suggesting Population Continuity Followed by are proposed with a focus on site function in the hopes of correcting some of the Replacement during the Late Woodland Period muddles in the models.

The documentation of the twist direction of cordage recorded as negative Barse, William P. impressions on the surface of Woodland. and Late Prehistoric ceramics in eastern Th e Fletchers Boathouse Site and its Place in Potomac Valley Prehistory North America suggest that the positive casts of these perishable artifacts reflect the distinct motor habits and preferences of prehistoric groups as well as individuals. Data recovery excavations conducted in the late summer and fall of 1998 at As such they represent the diagnostic signature of a group's perishable industry and 51NW l 3, the Fletchers Boathouse site, revealed a tightly clustered group of large thus a proxy for the group itself. The twist direction of cordage preserved on Middle Woodland refuse pits. These pits produced a ceramic assemblage ceramics representing a number of Woodland components in the Potomac River characterized principally by Albemarle and , with lesser amounts of basin are documented and reported in this study. Comparisons are made with other Mackley ware ceramics. The large size of the pits suggests that they served as reported cordage assemblages both within and beyond the Potomac drainage basin. storage features for a domestic group, perhaps one that returned to the site Although this is only a preliminary report, aggregate twist direction evidence repeatedly over an unknown span of time to re-occupy the site. Analysis of the tentatively suggests population continuity during the Early and Middle Woodland assemblage suggests that the Middle Woodland ceramic chronology not only may periods followed by a series of population replacements across the Late Woodland have overlap between ware groups, but that the Fall Line area of the Potomac and Protohistoric interludes. served as a border between style zones. These issues and others will be briefly addressed in this paper. Kellogg, Douglas C. AstraZeneca Site 2 (7NC-B-55): An Unplowed Up land Site in the Delaware Bowden, Bradley Piedmont Inter-Riverine Prehistoric Settlement Patterning in the Richmond Area: Alternative Research Methods and Comparative Data AstraZeneca Site 2 is a small, unplowed prehistoric archaeological site in northern Delaware comprising two concentrations of lithic debitage. All but a fewdebi tage Over the past 20 years, numerous archaeological investigations have been flakes are tan or reddish jasper tied by Instrumental Neutron Activation to the conducted in the greater Richmond area resulting in the identification of hundreds Pennsylvania jaspers of the Reading Prong area 65 to 80 kilometers to the north. of prehistoric archaeological sites. Many of these were identified along low-order One concentration is a dense deposit of over 1000 flakes confined to an area of less streams and appear to represent the remains of small, possibly kin-based, groups than six square meters. The second concentration is more diffuse covering an area engaged in the procurement of specific resources. Recent investigations at the of approximately thirty square meters. Fragments of a possible Brewerton-type Redwood Field Site in eastern Henrico County as well as a series of small sites biface are the only diagnostic tools. Preliminary analysis suggests that the site along Totopotomoy Creek have allowed fora synthesis of these data as they relate represents a single episode of lithic reduction from a single core during a single to prehistoric settlement in the interior or inter-riverine settings around Richmond. occupation with the focus of activities in the larger diffuse scatter. The smaller, Additionally, comparative data from contact period band and tribal societies in the more dense concentration may be a debitage disposal area. Pacific Northwest is discussed in an effort to offer additional insight into the nature of prehistoric settlement in North America among hunter-fisher-gatherers.

17 IO Boyd, Varna G. and John P. McCarthy their familyhist ories, and the cultural resource surveyors relied on family historians A Critical Perspective on "Hands-on " Education/Volunteer Programming: Case to set the sites in their . contexts. Since we were studying the saine subject Studies from Cultural Resources Management population, cooperation was mutually advantageous. An Internet mailing list, a genealogical web site and an archaeological web site, have evolved in the course of This paper will present an overview and critical assessment of "hands-on" fifteen years. The most recent published report, on the Bloomsbury site, includes a education/volunteer programming developed and executed as part of three cultural community social history, heavily dependent on contributions from the resources management (CRM) projects at Greenhorne & O'Mara, Inc. Using the genealogists. Without the Internet and the Web, collaborative research could not Fort Frederick, Lorton Town Center, and U.S. 219 Meyersdale Bypass projects as have been accomplished. While this work has been ongoing, descendants of site case studies, this critical review will include pros and cons of public occupants all over the country have found their roots in the Central Delaware education/volunteer involvement in each case. Broader ethical and professional Native American population. Locally, the community has organized itself and issues will also be addressed, including the appropriate role of volunteers in CRM. incorporated the Lenape Indian Tribe of Delaware. It will be argued that extreme care needs to be taken whenever volunteers are included in a project, especially when there is the intention of realizing cost reduction. Further, the paper will also argue that public outreach/education A Preliminary Examination of Cores Surface Collected from the Williamson programs need to focus first and foremost on meeting community needs while Hill,Paleoindian Phillip J.Site in Dinwiddie County, Virginia . maintaining professional standards of project performance. During the early 1990s, while conducting excavations at the Williamson Bryant, Tammy Paleoindian site ( 44DW l ), numerous uncontrolled surface collections were Archeological Overview of Recent Excavations on the Potomac River Floodplain completed in three upland, plow-disturbed fields. The early goal was to recover from Goose Creek to the River Channel Back of Selden Island additional Clovis points to add to the 130+ finds already documented. This goal changed after realizing that prior collectors may have removed all accessible Excavations in the floodplain between the junction of the Potomac River and Goose Paleoindian points from these fields. However, left behind after a forty-year Creek to the south of Selden Island, have revealed a number of stratified prehistoric surface collection history was a preponderance of exposed cores. Much has been archeological components. These range in time from the Late Woodland written about the Williamson site and its projectile points, yet little attention has Montgomery Focus through Selden Island, Marcey Creek, Transitional, Late been given to the ubiquitous cores scattered over the site. Although these fields Archaic and Halifax (and earlier). Depths vary, depending on floodplain position lack stratigraphic integrity and the primary context of the cores is lost, do these (e.g. Outer Levee, Inner Levee), anywhere from just below the surface to 7.9 feet Paleoindian artifacts offer any research value? This paper, involving a preliminary below surface. examination of the core collection, will begin to address this research question.

Carr, Kurt W. Johnson, Mike The Development of Prehistoric Settlement Pattern Research Priorities in Interior Small Stream and Up land Prehistoric Site Patterns in Fairfax County - Pennsylvania G/S Modeling and Interpretations

In 1996 the Pennsylvania Bureau for Historic Preservation (BHP) issued The For 25 years Fairfax County, Virginia has been the subject of a local government Development of Prehistoric Settlement Pattern Research Priorities in Pennsylvania, sponsored, intensive, archeological site survey effort. To date over 1,600 a document that establishes a policy on the need for Phase I survey forcom pliance prehistoric sites have been recorded fromthe 399 square miles of the County. This projects. The policy was developed to address the high cost and low return of effort has included supplemental evaluation and intensive recovery efforts on Phase I surveys in upland terrain. It is directed at managing multicomponent, plow hundreds of sites and produced an inventory approaching 3,000,000 items of data disturbed sites without subsurface features. It is assumed that these sites mainly currently summarized in the County's GIS. FairfaxCount y's eastern border consists contribute to our understanding of changing settlement patterns. Further, it is of the fresh water estuary of the Potomac River and its northern border is the fresh assumed that not all of these sites need to be located or tested. For nineteen water Potomac immediately above the Fall Line. The County also is transected by watersheds ( 18% of the total) determined to have the highest quality of data on two physiographic boundaries (Coastal Plain-Piedmont Uplands and Piedmont upland sites, Phase I surveys would be recommended only in riverine and certain Uplands-Culpeper Basin). With so many prominent environmental edges the

11 16 chute-terrace system has resulted in complex landforms and soil ages. Soil other high probability settings. This presentation will outline the criteria used to horizons and landforms correlated well with the archaeological findings. evaluate the individual watersheds and discuss the basic assumptions of this policy.

Chaney, Ed and Kirsti Uunila Galke, Laura "It's like my fa mily ": Using Archaeology to Create Identity Inferring Prehistoric Settlement Patterns Using Phase I Archaeological Data The act of doing archaeology creates a strange conflation of distance from and The Southern Maryland Regional Center, at Jefferson Patterson Park and Museum, intimacy with its subject. In this paper we present evidence from two public completed three Phase I shovel test surveys at the Naval Air Station, Patuxent archaeology projects on African American sites in a discussion of interactions River, located within St. Mary's County, Maryland. Each survey was conducted among a descendent family, volunteers, and archaeologists. We consider how around a relatively small drainage, and each used the same methodology. While archaeological subjects have affected and defined roles in these relationships. the information available from Phase I archaeological surveys can be limited, a comparison of site distributions among the three creeks demonstrated that the Chiarulli, Beverly A. distribution and density of artifacts present was not random. The resulting Upland Sites in the Conemaugh-Blacklick Wa tershed temporal, functional, and spatial patterns demonstrate differences in the use of these creeks and their resources. This presentation identifies these patterns and explores This report ·describes an investigation of the distribution of prehistoric the possible social and environmental motivations behind them. archaeological sites in the Conemaugh-Blacklick watershed, located in Indiana, Westmoreland, Cambria, and Somerset Counties, Pennsylvania. The watershed Goode, Charles and William M. Gardner was identified as one of the high upland site density watersheds by the staff of the Observations on Early Woodland Ceramics and Points from Deep Excavations in Bureau of Historic Preservation of Pennsylvania Historical and Museum the Virginia Potomac River Floodplain between Goose Creek and Selden Island Commission through the analysis of the Pennsylvania Archaeological Site Survey computerized site fi les. The current study is part of an investigation conducted by Recent studies on the Virginia side of the Potomac River floodplain between Goose the Pennsylvania Archaeological Council, which was designed to evaluate whether Creek and Selden Island have shown relatively clear continuities in projectile point the sample of upland sites from these high-density watersheds was sufficient to styles and ceramics. The tempor-al stratification meets expectations with the only understand the prehistoric site settlement patterns of the watershed. This real stylistic separation appearing in the projectile points as the stemmed point investigation found that the prehistoric settlement patterns in the watershed were tradition of the Savannah River Stemmed-Bare Island/Holmes gives way to the strongly influenced by the distribution of chert sources and other localized notched point tradition of the Savannah River-Dry Brook-Orient-Vernon. The resources. However, since few sites in either upland or riverine settings have been companion containers show a major mechanical shift from carved stone bowls to systematically investigated, more questions remain than were answered by the tempered ceramics, first modeled then coiled, with increasing sand through time to study. the all sand tempered Accokeek Cordmarked. While Marcey Creek, Selden Island and cognates appear over a side area, the area covered by these types pales in Clem, Michael comparison to Accokeek and kindred. This paper will concentrate on description Plantation Landscapes: Making Practical Use of the Information Provided. with some flights of fancyby the junior author. Visitors to the Antebellum South were often struck by the landscape of the Heite, Ned plantations . they found there. Each was made up of a collection of service Genealogy as an AuxiliaryScience to Archaeology structures necessary forthe maintenance and operation of the planter's household. Each plantation house was typically flanked by a kitchen, dairy, smokehouse and a A series of nineteenth-century CRM projects in central Kent County, Delaware, laundry. The focus of this paper is on these service buildings closely associated brought the author repeatedly into contact with the same group of Native American with the "yard" area of the plantation house. I have compared six such plantation families. Each project studied members of these families and gradually increased landscapes of Northern Virginia in an attempt to create a predictive model for the research collaboration between Native American genealogists and cultural­ archeological studies at similar sites. I also apply this model to smaller nineteenth resource practitioners. Genealogists used the cultural resource studies to enhance century farms to find if the pattern holds true here. By studying the relationship of

15 12 the "yard" to the main house we may enable ourselves to more readily locate and RCYBP (Beta-141239). The resulting two sigma calibrated calendar age range for identify these structures. this assay would be AD I 020 to 1250, with an intercept calendar age of AD 1160. Based on these and other data we suggest consideration of a number of alternative Cunningham, Kevin ways of interpreting the Accokeek Creek site and the larger Potomac Creek Connecting People and Our Past The Public, Cultural Resources and the complex. Delaware Department of Transportation Duncan, Josh For several decades, DelDOT has been incorporating the interests and concerns of Mobility and Sedentism in the NorthernNeck, AD 1500-1 700. all of our publics within our public works archeology and historic preservation projects - schoolchildren, retirees, scouts, historical societies, church groups, Since. the beginning of anthropology as a discipline, anthropologists have Native Americans, nature organizations, ethnic communities, social an professional recognized that sedentism and mobility are characteristics of human societies. clubs, senior centers, professionals and the like into our transportation-related More recent studies have attempted to move beyond the mobile-sedentary projects. This multi-pronged, inclusive, reflexive, multi-vocal approach has dichotomy by investigating the ways sedentism and mobility coexist within the through lime completely changed the way historic preservation and archeology is particular societies by examining patterns of movement around sedentary villages. practiced and conducted in Delaware. In addition to involving our many publics In the Northern Neck of Virginia, the villages strung along the Rappahannock and and putting their creative, innovative and unique ideas into practice, public Potomac created a nexus around which lifere volved, but did not circumscribe the participation offe rs people a unique personal experience, simultaneously providing activities of people. This analysis uses regional and site-specific data from the an ideal venue to share information about transportation planning, environmental Northern Neck to investigate Protohistoric settlement patterns. analysis, and decision-making processes associated with all of our cultural resource projects. These experiences will be explored within the continually developing, Emerson, Matthew sustaining and interactive environment of our projects, which are always limited in The Search for Anthony Johnson's Settlement on Virginia 's EasternShore time and at temporary locations. This paper is a report-in-progress on archaeological investigations of a settlement Deetz, J. Eric area on Virginia's Eastern Shore where the Anthony Johnson family may have lived Architecture at James Fort for a short period of time during the 17th century. Johnson was a freed African slave and some of his activities and lifestyle are documented in court records. Along with the remains of the walls of James Fort, APVA Jamestown Rediscovery Social historical research on the Johnsons and their immediate neighbors and a archaeologists have found the remains of two complete structures that can landscape reconstruction mapping method is presented. Recent survey and test confidently be dated to the early fort period. The archaeological footprints are excavations in Accomack County in the Pungoteague-Nandua watershed area are different than most earth-fast structures found in the tidewater region. This paper revi·ewed as inconclusive yet promising for continued investigation. will compare these structures to regional vernacular architecture traditions of England and the cast midlands area in particular. The outcome presents a "diffe rent Foss, John E. and Daniel P. Wagner look" to early Jamestown. Soils of the TerraceSeq uence along the Potomac River, Loudoun County, Virginia

Dent, Richard J. and Christine A. Jirikowic The floodplain-terrace system at the study sites had three major landscapes; these Th e Accokeek Creek Site: Chronology and the Potomac Creek Complex are the Pleistocene terrace (in some places early Holocene), levee, and the flood chute complex and local alluvium. Historic alluvium occurs as a thin cap (<0.5 m) This paper reviews existing data on the Potomac Creek Complex as manifested at on many of the terraces and levee, and with thicker deposits in the poorly drained the Accokeek Creek site ( I 8PR8) in Prince Georges County, Maryland. It presents and local alluvial sites. Near the entrance of Goose Creek to the Potomac River, a a radiocarbon assay recently obtained from organic surface residue on Potomac highly complex series of soils was noted showing a wide range of properties within Creek pottery originally recovered by Mrs. Alice Ferguson in her excavations of the short distances. · Farther downstream back of Selden Island, the levee and flood Accokeek Creek site during the 1930s. The AMS date, obtained from sherds now chute soils were more uniform and predictable. The dissection within the flood curated at the Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan was 900±50

13 1 4 . the "yard" to the main house we may enable ourselves to more readily locate and RCYBP (Beta- 141239). The resulting two sigma calibrated calendar age range for identify these structures. this assay would be AD I 020 to 1250, with an intercept calendar age of AD 1160. Based on these and other data we suggest consideration of a number of alternative Cunningham, Kevin ways of interpreting the Accokeek Creek site and the larger Potomac Creek Connecting People and Our Past The Public, Cultural Resources and the complex. Delaware Department of Transportation Duncan, Josh For several decades, DelDOT has been incorporating the interests and concerns of Mobility and Sedentism in the NorthernNeck, AD 1500-1 700. all of our publics within our public works archeology and historic preservation projects - schoolchildren, retirees, scouts, historical societies, church groups, Since. the beginning of anthropology as a discipline, anthropologists have Native Americans, nature organizations, ethnic communities, social an professional recognized that sedentism and mobility are characteristics of human societies. clubs, senior centers, professionals and the like into our transportation-related More recent studies have attempted to move beyond the mobile-sedentary projects. This multi-pronged, inclusive, reflexive, multi-vocal approach has dichotomy by investigating the ways sedentism and mobility coexist within the through lime completely changed the way historic preservation and archeology is particular societies by examining patterns of movement around sedentary villages. practiced and conducted in Delaware. In addition to involving our many publics In the Northern Neck of Virginia, the villages strung along the Rappahannock and and putting their creative, innovative and unique ideas into practice, public Potomac created a nexus around which liferev olved, but did not circumscribe the participation offe rs people a unique personal experience, simultaneously providing activities of people. This analysis uses regional and site-specific data from the an ideal venue to share information about transportation planning, environmental Northern Neck to investigate Protohistoric settlement patterns. analysis, and decision-making processes associated with all of our cultural resource projects. These experiences will be explored within the continually developing, Emerson, Matthew sustaining and interactive environment of our projects, which are always limited in The Search fo r Anthony Johnson's Settlement on Virginia's EasternShore time and at temporary locations. This paper is a report-in-progress on archaeological investigations of a settlement Deetz, J. Eric area on Virginia's Eastern Shore where the Anthony Johnson family may have lived Architecture at James Fort for a short period of time during the 17th century. Johnson was a freed African slave and some of his activities and lifestyle are documented in court records. Along with the remains of the walls of James Fort, APVA Jamestown Rediscovery Social historical research on the Johnsons and their immediate neighbors and a archaeologists have found the remains of two complete structures that can landscape reconstruction mapping method is presented. Recent survey and test confidently be dated to the early fort period. The archaeological footprints are excavations in Accomack County in the Pungoteague-Nandua watershed area are different than most earth-fast structures found in the tidewater region. This paper revi·ewed as inconclusive yet promising for continued investigation. will compare these structures to regional vernacular architecture traditions of England and the cast midlands area in particular. The outcome presents a "different Foss, John E. and Daniel P. Wagner look" to early Jamestown. Soils of the TerraceSequence along the Potomac River, Loudoun County, Virginia

Dent, Richard J. and Christine A. Jirikowic The floodplain-terrace system at the study sites had three major landscapes; these Th e Accokeek Creek Site: Chronology and the Potomac Creek Complex are the Pleistocene terrace (in some places early Holocene), levee, and the flood chute complex and local alluvium. Historic alluvium occurs as a thin cap (<0.5 m) This paper reviews existing data on the Potomac Creek Complex as manifested at on many of the terraces and levee, and with thicker deposits in the poorly drained the Accokeek Creek site ( I 8PR8) in Prince Georges County, Maryland. It presents and local alluvial sites. Near the entrance of Goose Creek to the Potomac River, a a radiocarbon assay recently obtained from organic surface residue on Potomac highly complex series of soils was noted showing a wide range of properties within Creek pottery originally recovered by Mrs. Alice Ferguson in her excavations of the short distances. · Farther downstream back of Selden Island, the levee and flood Accokeek Creek site during the 1930s. The AMS date, obtained from sherds now chute soils were more uniform and predictable. The dissection within the flood curated at the Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan was 900±50

13 1 4 . chute-terrace system has resulted in complex landforms and soil ages. Soil other high probability settings. This presentation will outline the criteria used to horizons and landforms correlated well with the archaeological findings. evaluate the individual watersheds and discuss the basic assumptions of this policy.

Chaney, Ed and Kirsti Uunila Galke, Laura "It's like my fa mily ": Using Archaeology to Create Identity Inferring Prehistoric Settlement Patterns Using Phase I Archaeological Data The act of doing archaeology creates a strange conflation of distance from and The Southern Maryland Regional Center, at Jefferson Patterson Park and Museum, intimacy with its subject. In this paper we present evidence from two public completed three Phase I shovel test surveys at the Naval Air Station, Patuxent archaeology projects on African American sites in a discussion of interactions River, located within St. Mary's County, Maryland. Each survey was conducted among a descendent family, volunteers, and archaeologists. We consider how around a relatively small drainage, and each used the same methodology. While archaeological subjects have affected and defined roles in these relationships. the information available fromPhase I archaeological surveys can be limited, a comparison of site distributions among the three creeks demonstrated that the Chiarulli, Beverly A. distribution and density of artifacts present was not random. The resulting Upland Sites in the Conemaugh-Blacklick Wa tershed temporal, functional, and spatial patterns demonstrate differences in the use of these creeks and their resources. This presentation identifies these patterns and explores This report ·describes an investigation of the distribution of prehistoric the possible social and environmental motivations behind them. archaeological sites in the Conemaugh-Blacklick watershed, located in Indiana, Westmoreland, Cambria, and Somerset Counties, Pennsylvania. The watershed Goode, Charles and William M. Gardner was identified as one of the high upland site density watersheds by the staff of the Observations on Early Woodland Ceramics and Points from Deep Excavations in Bureau of Historic Preservation of Pennsylvania Historical and Museum the Virginia Potomac River Floodplain between Goose Creek and Selden Island Commission through the analysis of the Pennsylvania Archaeological Site Survey computerized site fi les. The current study is part of an investigation conducted by Recent studies on the Virginia side of the Potomac River floodplain between Goose the Pennsylvania Archaeological Council, which was designed to evaluate whether Creek and Selden Island have shown relatively clear continuities in projectile point the sample of upland sites from these high-density watersheds was sufficient to styles and ceramics. The tempor-al stratification meets expectations with the only understand the prehistoric site settlement patterns of the watershed. This real stylistic separation appearing in the projectile points as the stemmed point investigation found that the prehistoric settlement patterns in the watershed were tradition of the Savannah River Stemmed-Bare Island/Holmes gives way to the strongly influenced by the distribution of chert sources and other localized notched point tradition of the Savannah River-Dry Brook-Orient-Vernon. The resources. However, since few sites in either upland or riverine settings have been companion containers show a major mechanical shift from carved stone bowls to systematically investigated, more questions remain than were answered by the tempered ceramics, first modeled then coiled, with increasing sand through time to study. the all sand tempered Accokeek Cordmarked. While Marcey Creek, Selden Island and cognates appear over a side area, the area covered by these types pales in Clem, Michael comparison to Accokeek and kindred. This paper will concentrate on description Plantation Landscapes: Making Practical Use of the Information Provided. with some flights of fancyby the junior author. Visitors to the Antebellum South were often struck by the landscape of the Heite, Ned plantations . they found there. Each was made up of a collection of service Genealogy as an AuxiliaryScience to Archaeology structures necessary forthe maintenance and operation of the planter's household. Each plantation house was typically flanked by a kitchen, dairy, smokehouse and a A series of nineteenth-century CRM projects in central Kent County, Delaware, laundry. The focus of this paper is on these service buildings closely associated brought the author repeatedly into contact with the same group of Native American with the "yard" area of the plantation house. I have compared six such plantation families. Each project studied members of these families and gradually increased landscapes of Northern Virginia in an attempt to create a predictive model for the research collaboration between Native American genealogists and cultural­ archeological studies at similar sites. I also apply this model to smaller nineteenth resource practitioners. Genealogists used the cultural resource studies to enhance century farms to find if the pattern holds true here. By studying the relationship of

15 12 Boyd, Varna G. and John P. McCarthy their familyhist ories, and the cultural resource surveyors relied on family historians A Critical Perspective on "Hands-on " Education/Volunteer Programming: Case to set the sites in their . contexts. Since we were studying the saine subject Studies from Cultural Resources Management population, cooperation was mutually advantageous. An Internet mailing list, a genealogical web site and an archaeological web site, have evolved in the course of This paper will present an overview and critical assessment of "hands-on" fifteen years. The most recent published report, on the Bloomsbury site, includes a education/volunteer programming developed and executed as part of three cultural community social history, heavily dependent on contributions from the resources management (CRM) projects at Greenhorne & O'Mara, Inc. Using the genealogists. Without the Internet and the Web, collaborative research could not Fort Frederick, Lorton Town Center, and U.S. 219 Meyersdale Bypass projects as have been accomplished. While this work has been ongoing, descendants of site case studies, this critical review will include pros and cons of public occupants all over the country have found their roots in the Central Delaware education/volunteer involvement in each case. Broader ethical and professional Native American population. Locally, the community has organized itself and issues will also be addressed, including the appropriate role of volunteers in CRM. incorporated the Lenape Indian Tribe of Delaware. It will be argued that extreme care needs to be taken whenever volunteers are included in a project, especially when there is the intention of realizing cost reduction. Further, the paper will also argue that public outreach/education A Preliminary Examination of Cores Surface Collected from the Williamson programs need to focus first and foremost on meeting community needs while Hill,Paleoindian Phillip J.Site in Dinwiddie County, Virginia . maintaining professional standards of project performance. During the early 1990s, while conducting excavations at the Williamson Bryant, Tammy Paleoindian site ( 44DW l ), numerous uncontrolled surface collections were Archeological Overview of Recent Excavations on the Potomac River Floodplain completed in three upland, plow-disturbed fields. The early goal was to recover from Goose Creek to the River Channel Back of Selden Island additional Clovis points to add to the 130+ finds already documented. This goal changed after realizing that prior collectors may have removed all accessible Excavations in the floodplain between the junction of the Potomac River and Goose Paleoindian points from these fields. However, left behind after a forty-year Creek to the south of Selden Island, have revealed a number of stratified prehistoric surface collection history was a preponderance of exposed cores. Much has been archeological components. These range in time from the Late Woodland written about the Williamson site and its projectile points, yet little attention has Montgomery Focus through Selden Island, Marcey Creek, Transitional, Late been given to the ubiquitous cores scattered over the site. Although these fields Archaic and Halifax (and earlier). Depths vary, depending on floodplain position lack stratigraphic integrity and the primary context of the cores is lost, do these (e.g. Outer Levee, Inner Levee), anywhere from just below the surface to 7.9 feet Paleoindian artifacts offer any research value? This paper, involving a preliminary below surface. examination of the core collection, will begin to address this research question.

Carr, Kurt W. Johnson, Mike Th e Development of Prehistoric Settlement Pattern Research Priorities in Interior Small Stream and Upland Prehistoric Site Patterns in Fairfax County - Pennsylvania G/S Modeling and Interpretations

In 1996 the Pennsylvania Bureau for Historic Preservation (BHP) issued The For 25 years Fairfax County, Virginia has been the subject of a local government Development of Prehistoric Settlement Pattern Research Priorities in Pennsylvania, sponsored, intensive, archeological site survey effort. To date over 1,600 a document that establishes a policy on the need for Phase I survey forcom pliance prehistoric sites have been recorded fromthe 399 square miles of the County. This projects. The policy was developed to address the high cost and low return of effort has included supplemental evaluation and intensive recovery efforts on Phase I surveys in upland terrain. It is directed at managing multicomponent, plow hundreds of sites and produced an inventory approaching 3,000,000 items of data disturbed sites without subsurface features. It is assumed that these sites mainly currently summarized in the County's GIS. FairfaxCount y's eastern border consists contribute to our understanding of changing settlement patterns. Further, it is of the fresh water estuary of the Potomac River and its northern border is the fresh assumed that not all of these sites need to be located or tested. For nineteen water Potomac immediately above the Fall Line. The County also is transected by watersheds ( 18% of the total) determined to have the highest quality of data on two physiographic boundaries (Coastal Plain-Piedmont Uplands and Piedmont upland sites, Phase I surveys would be recommended only in riverine and certain Uplands-Culpeper Basin). With so many prominent environmental edges the

11 16 County is uniquely suited for this kind of study. Data from adjacent Arlington time period, or humanness. It is noteworthy that these sites are usually County will be included. This paper will be an update to, and expansion of the concentrations of lithics, not scatters. In addition, they should be held in the excellent Late Archaic-Late Woodland model proposed by Gardner in the early framework of cultural function, not artifact type. Discussion on these "lithic 1980s. scatters" and other sites recorded culminated in settlement pattern models based on the Phase I inventories. After doggedly following the edicts of the models for a Johnson, William C. quarter century, information from added and more intensive survey and increased Who Were Those Gals? Cordage Twist Direction and Ethnicity in the Potomac testing has negated much of the power of the models of the past. New approaches River Basin: Preliminary Evidence Suggesting Population Continuity Followed by are proposed with a focus on site function in the hopes of correcting some of the Replacement during the Late Woodland Period muddles in the models.

The documentation of the twist direction of cordage recorded as negative Barse, William P. impressions on the surface of Woodland. and Late Prehistoric ceramics in eastern Th e Fletchers Boathouse Site and its Place in Potomac Valley Prehistory North America suggest that the positive casts of these perishable artifacts reflect the distinct motor habits and preferences of prehistoric groups as well as individuals. Data recovery excavations conducted in the late summer and fall of 1998 at As such they represent the diagnostic signature of a group's perishable industry and 51NW l 3, the Fletchers Boathouse site, revealed a tightly clustered group of large thus a proxy for the group itself. The twist direction of cordage preserved on Middle Woodland refuse pits. These pits produced a ceramic assemblage ceramics representing a number of Woodland components in the Potomac River characterized principally by Albemarle and Popes Creek, with lesser amounts of basin are documented and reported in this study. Comparisons are made with other Mackley ware ceramics. The large size of the pits suggests that they served as reported cordage assemblages both within and beyond the Potomac drainage basin. storage features for a domestic group, perhaps one that returned to the site Although this is only a preliminary report, aggregate twist direction evidence repeatedly over an unknown span of time to re-occupy the site. Analysis of the tentatively suggests population continuity during the Early and Middle Woodland assemblage suggests that the Middle Woodland ceramic chronology not only may periods followed by a series of population replacements across the Late Woodland have overlap between ware groups, but that the Fall Line area of the Potomac and Protohistoric interludes. served as a border between style zones. These issues and others will be briefly addressed in this paper. Kellogg, Douglas C. AstraZeneca Site 2 (7NC-B-55): An Unplowed Up land Site in the Delaware Bowden, Bradley Piedmont Inter-Riverine Prehistoric Settlement Patterning in the Richmond Area: Alternative Research Methods and Comparative Data AstraZeneca Site 2 is a small, unplowed prehistoric archaeological site in northern Delaware comprising two concentrations of lithic debitage. All but a fewd ebitage Over the past 20 years, numerous archaeological investigations have been flakes are tan or reddish jasper tied by Instrumental Neutron Activation to the conducted in the greater Richmond area resulting in the identification of hundreds Pennsylvania jaspers of the Reading Prong area 65 to 80 kilometers to the north. of prehistoric archaeological sites. Many of these were identified along low-order One concentration is a dense deposit of over 1000 flakes confined to an area of less streams and appear to represent the remains of small, possibly kin-based, groups than six square meters. The second concentration is more diffuse covering an area engaged in the procurement of specific resources. Recent investigations at the of approximately thirty square meters. Fragments of a possible Brewerton-type Redwood Field Site in eastern Henrico County as well as a series of small sites biface are the only diagnostic tools. Preliminary analysis suggests that the site along Totopotomoy Creek have allowed fora synthesis of these data as they relate represents a single episode of lithic reduction from a single core during a single to prehistoric settlement in the interior or inter-riverine settings around Richmond. occupation with the focus of activities in the larger diffuse scatter. The smaller, Additionally, comparative data from contact period band and tribal societies in the more dense concentration may be a debitage disposal area. Pacific Northwest is discussed in an effort to offer additional insight into the nature of prehistoric settlement in North America among hunter-fisher-gatherers.

17 IO INDIVIDUAL PAPER ABSTRACTS Klein, Michael J. Discovering Sites Unseen, Excavating Unforseen Sites

Anthony, Nancy H. and Michael F. Johnson Archaeological research in the inter-riverine uplands requires archaeologists to Tool Production at the Lorton To wn Center Complex consider the probabilities of discovering differen! types of sites of as well as the identification of appropriate methods of sampling sites characterized by Within the proposed Lorton Town Center (LTC) development in Fairfax County, considerable variation in assemblage composition and spatial patterning. Virginia, in-depth data recovery was conducted at three interior prehistoric sites on Moreover, recognition of patterns at the regional, local, and site-specific levels secondary terraces adj acent to Pohick Creek, and just above the Coastal appears critical for understanding and interpreting upland sites. Consequently, Plain/Piedmont physiographic boundary. Each site· was multi-component. The attention to both site-specific and regional databases is essential forint erpretation entire complex produced artifacts representing the Paleo-Indian through Late of upland sites. This paper addresses these issues through an analysis of data from Woodland period. Concentrated tool production components from the Piscataway the southern Middle Atlantic Region. period were recovered from sites LTC- 1 and LTC-2. This paper will discuss the 1 tool making process and settlement pattern possibly evident therein, and will Krass, Dorothy Schlotthauer and Beverly A. Chiarulli address the broader cultural context of the LTC complex. Enhancing Public Views of Archaeology: Initiatives from the SAA Public Education Committee Baker, Joe City Island /994 to 2000: A Retrospective Television producers and magazine editors know that many people find archaeology to be an exotic and fascinating field. Archaeological information can Between 1994 and 2000, I participated in and directed the City Island Project, an be found in museums, in classrooms, in books and magazines and, increasingly, in annual public archaeology program co-sponsored by the Pennsylvania Historical open houses at excavations and on the Internet. What does the public learn about and Museum Commission and the City of Harrisburg. During that period the archaeology from alt these sources? How do we want the public to view our program steadily grew from a simple block excavation sheltered beneath . an old subject? These are questions that the Society forAmerican Archaeology's Public military cook tent, into one of the largest and most popular public celebrations of Education Committee has examined forthe past l O years. In this paper, we will the buried past in the Middle Atlantic region. My presentation will describe the discuss some of the answers we have found through the development of programs goals, history and evolution, structure, and accomplishments of the project to date, and publications, and through a national public opinion poll. as well as the role and importance of public outreach to the entire archaeological community. Marston, Jennifer and William P. Barse Reconstructing a Middle Woodland Household Vessel Assemblage Barber, Michael B. Small Si�es on the Appalachian Mduntain Slopes: Changes in Altitudes, Changes Analysis of rim sherds and larger body sherds recovered from the Middle in Attitudes Woodland pit features at the Fletchers Boathouse site show that a standard range of vessel shapes were employed by the former inhabitants of the site. Four distinct Thirty years ago in the mountainous area of western Virginia, no one expected to shape categories can be defined forAlb emarle ware at the site, each with varying find archaeological resources to be located above the floodplain and terrace degrees of popularity. These vessel shapes _are compared with available systems of major drainages. No one expected to find such higher elevation sites assemblages from other Middle Woodland sites to assess the degree of primarily because no one looked. Beyond a lack of research interest, standardization in household assemblages. These are compared with both Early archaeologists were not fond of hiking up the sides of mountains, battling through Woodland vessel assemblages and Late Woodland assemblages in the Potomac rhododendron jungles, green briar clear cuts, and bear habitat. Settlement pattern Valley to show trends in vessel shape and size through time. models, although mostly implicit, were constructed in such a manner that prehistoric peoples were believed to followma jor rivers, never looking left nor right, and scllling for a low level life style. Unfortunately many of these sites have been referred to as "lithic scatters," a nomenclature devoid of cultural function,

9 18 Individual and Communities Identities at the Cemetery: Some Implications of AfMcCarthy,rican-Influenced John Burial Practices in Antebellum Philadelphia use of inter-riverine settings. Although previous models have acknowledged a range of interior site types, archaeologists commonly wrestle with associating The archaeology of cemeteries deals with the graves of individuals whose identities specific sites with these types due to the often qualitative nature of the comparative in the past included, but were not limited to, membership in the communities in database. Additionally, there has been considerable variability in the level of effort which they lived and worked. African-American graves arc often anonymous in employed to examine these sites. The goal of this session is to review recent that we do not know the specific identity of the individual in the grave, only that archaeological research, discuss the successes and shortcomings of past method and they were members of a particular community or congregation. This paper theory, and generate local and regional research objectives concerning the considers the essential paradox of this relationship between the individual and the prehistoric use of low order streams in Virginia. community in the archaeology of cemeteries using examples drawn from the author's ongoing analysis of African-influenced burial practices at cemeteries used (Session 3) by the First AfricanBa ptist Church of Philadelphia. Archaeology in the Potomac River Valley: From Headwaters to Tidewater (and in between .... )

The Final Frontier: Space, Time, and Cosmology in Late Prehistoric SouthwesternMeans, Bernard PennsylvaniaK. Organizers: Tammy Bryant, John Mullen, William M. Gardner, and Joe DentArcha eologists began excavating sites along the Potomac River in the mid- to late­ The 1934 to 1940 Somerset County (Pennsylvania) Relief Excavations completely nineteenth century. Excavation activity peaked again in the mid-twentieth century revealed the community plans of several Late Prehistoric (A.O. 900 to A.O. 1400s) with the ascendancy of the New Archaeology, the establishment of active Monongahela village sites. While the few publications resulting from these archaeology programs in local universities, and the rise of cultural resources excavations were brief and largely descriptive, they were conducted systematically management. The results of all this research answered many questions about the and field results were thoroughly documented. These field data are examined in local prehistoric past, but in the process it also raised some new questions or terms of a general model of ring-shaped village organization that relies on spatial pointed to areas where our understanding was far from complete. Potomac River layouts determined through the differential distribution of archaeologica11y­ archaeology has within the past few years undergone somewhat of a renaissance recovered elements. The layout of ring-shaped Monongahela village s_ite represents concurrent with the investigation of a significant number of sites along its banks. an imago mundi, or image of the universe. An analysis of Monongahela village This symposium reports on recent archaeological research at sites from near the sites can reveal the various social, economic, political, and even cosmological western limits of the river, in the Piedmont, and further east along the Coastal Plain. factors influencing their layouts.

(Session 5) Summaryof the Upland Settlement Pattern Studies The Historical Archaeology of Identityand Meaning Miller, Patricia This paper will summarize the results of the upland settlement pattern study in terms of the assumptions of the survey priorities policy and the goals of the PAC TheOrganizer days of and historical Chair: archae Johnolo McCgy'sarthy role as "handmaiden to history" are long gone. project. The studies have provided detailed understandings of the site data in three Contemporary historical archaeology has come to focus in a large part on the ways of the exempted watersheds and on the degree to which these sites can contribute to that the material world reflects individual and community identities and was used to our understanding of settlement patterns. Whether other research issues can be create meaning in the everyday lives of people of the more recent past. This group addressed is problematical since upland sites are often plow disturbed -and have of papers demonstrates the range of theoretical and methodological approaches and very low artifact densities. Given the high cost of archaeological survey, upland substantive content that such studies in the Mid-Atlantic region now routinely terrain represents a challenge to resource managers who must prioritize limited encompass resources. (Session 7).

19 8 On the Pleistocene Terrace Back of Selden Island Mullen, John SYMPOSIUM ABSTRACTS Phase I excavations on a Pleistocene terrace in Loudoun County, Virginia, uncovered a continuous scatter of artifacts. Among the sites found was a Late Woodland hamlet containing Montgomery focus ceramics. While much is known about the floodplain communities of this time period, little is known about these Prehistoric Settlement Patterns in Up land Settings terrace sites. This paper will present an analysis of the artifacts from this site and relate it to other terrace hamlets reported but not studied in this locality and the Broad Run area. InOrganizers: I 996 the Pen Kurtnsyl Carrvania andHist oricalPatricia and Miller Museum Commission, Bureau forHi storic Preservation (BHP) issued The Development of Prehistoric Settlement Pattern Research Priorities in Pennsylvania, a document that establishes a policy on the Paddling Upstream: Models and the Importance of lnterriverine Sites need for Phase l archaeological survey for compliance projects. The policy was Nash, Carole developed lo address the issue of the high cost and low return of Phase I surveys in Archaeological studies of prehistoric settlement in Virginia have long been upland terrain. For nineteen watersheds determined lo have the highest quality of associated with hierarchical models in which riverine-based sites control the data on upland sites, Phase I surveys would be recommended only in riverine and interpretation of interriverine site types and functions, regardless of the level of certain other high probability settings. The Pennsylvania Archaeological Council social complexity. The site-based models, heuristic devices heavily dependent on (PAC) developed the upland settlement patterns project to address the need for a _ ethnographic analogy, assume a limited set of signatures forpast human ?ehav1ors. better understanding of the site data in low-priority watersheds so as to determine They have been criticized for their inability to incorporate ethnograph1cally and what, if any, important research questions could be answered through additional historically documented variability in settlement and subsistence strategies, the archaeological survey. The project, which was funded by a Pennsylvania Historical practical implications of which are clear: the loss of a significant portion of our and Museum Commission Historic Preservation grant, studied three of the 19 archaeological database to a constraining model that minimizes the role of watersheds. In this symposium we will present a paper on the development of the interriverine sites in prehistoric settlement systems. This paper presents an policy, as well as papers on the results in each of the three watersheds. Dr. Dean overview of the nature of interriverine sites and the most frequently used models Snow of the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission will serve as through which they are studied by Virginia archaeologists. The theoretical and _ discussant. We hope that a discussion of management issues related to upland methodological implications of each model will be considered through the analysis prehistoric sites will follow. 1) of a data set from the Inner Piedmont of central Virginia. (Session Take Me Away From the River: An Examinatio11 of Inter-riverine Prehistoric " ...ne ar where stood an old house. " -A Late 18th CenturyDelaware Brick Clamp Settleme11t in Virgi11ia O'Neill, Patrick L. A rural brick clamp complex was excavated during Phase III investigations on the Organizer: Bradley Bowden SR- I Highway Corridor Project in southern New Castle County, Delaware. The With some notable exceptions, the majority of detailed prehistoric archaeological entire clamp complex was uncovered, consisting of a 2 x 2.5 m wide heat signature, research in Virginia has focused on large floodplain sites with Late Woodland a procurement/ mixing pit, and structural remains of a drying or processing components. Regional settlement pattern models have incorporated this data with canopy/shed. The extremely small size of the clamp indicates that the complex materialist theory and cross-cultural comparison of environmentally constricted could have probably produced only enough bricks for a foundation or chimney groups offering generalized evolutionary models in which a site's inferred feature. Information on non-brick artifacts and firing stages, quality of brick, and occupation duration and density degrades with its relative size, artifact diversity, the clamp complex features, will provide insight to this under-researched domain of and proximity to larger sites along major rivers. While these models are generally th th the late I 8 and early I 9 century Delaware rural landscape. Comparative analysis effective, more recent, largely CRM-based, research has recognized considerable of bricks, clamps, and small kilns fromother regions will be presented to define regional, temporal, and apparent functional diversity in prehistoric technological process and adaptation in rural settings.

7 20 Perazio, Philip A. and William J. Meyer Bernard K. Means Th e Final Frontier: Space, Time, and Th e Conodoguinet Wa tershed Cosmology in late Prehistoric Southwestern Pennsylvania 10:30 - 10:50 A review of data was conducted for the Conodoguinet watershed, one of the two George A. Tolley Th e Analysis of a Guilfo rd Aged Chipping exempted watersheds in central Pennsylvania. It was found that the existing Cluster from 44GYJ8 database is insufficientto address basic questions regarding chronology, site type, 10:50-1 1:10 and site distribution. This was the result of two factors - small sample size and the Douglas C. Kellogg AstraZeneca Site 2 (7NC-B-55): An poor quality of data available on the majority of sites. Important research questions Unplowed Up land Site in the Delaware Piedmont that could be addressed if adequate data were available fromthe watershed include: 11:10-11:30 1) whether chert was procured from local bedrock sources; 2) the possible role of Phillip J. Hill A Preliminary Examination of Cores Swface this watershed in the transhipment of rhyolite fromsources to the south into the Collected from the Williamson Paleoindian Site in Dinwiddie upper Susquehanna drainage; and 3) the role of environmental variables in I 1:30-11:50 County, Virginia influencing upland settlement patterns in different portions of the watershed. Among the recommendations for changes to the survey priorities policy was to focussurvey efforts on wooded areas or long-fallow fields near key resource zones.

Reeves, Matthew Asking the Right Questions: Archaeologists and Descendent Communities Archaeologists often interview and work with people descended from the historical population they are studying. Many times the descendent groups provide the archaeologist with exciting information regarding the family history and the location of structures at the site. Descendents' participation_in the research project also gives the research a degree of authority by providing a concrete connection between the past and present. While researchers clearly benefit from their relationship with descendent groups, the relevance to the descendent group is not always so clear. Today's researchers are faced with the challenge of making their research relevant to the descendent communities. Using examples from field work in Jamaica and the American South, the author will provide suggestions for how research carried out between descendent communities and social scientists can be beneficial forboth .

Scheid, Dwayne Public Archaeology at Mount Vernon: A Descriptive Analysis of the Program's Development The goals, of the Mount Vernon Ladies' Association Archaeology Program, for its volunteers and the public, are to increase the understanding of archaeological methods and to promote a greater appreciation of the lives of George Washington, his family, employees and slaves. This paper looks at the programs that are generally considered to be part of public archaeology. Mount Vernon has a volunteer program that creates opportunities to learn while pursuing professional research. In addition to the volunteer focus, public archaeology at Mount Vernon also includes both formal and informal educational outreach programs. This paper

6 I 21 will discuss the past, present and future of public archaeology at Mount Vernon. It Saturday Evening, March 24 will also examine how these programs have enhanced the public's understanding of 7:00 - 8:00 Business Meeting archaeology and Eighteenth-Century lifeways.

8:00 - 12:00 Reception Siegel, Peter E., Douglas C. Kellogg and Robert G. Kingsley Brandywine Creek Watershed (Watershed H), Chester, Lancaster, and Delaware Counties, Pennsylvania I Sunday Morning, March 25 A review was conducted of the Pennsylvania Archaeological Site Survey (PASS) file data forpreh istoric sites, as well as all cultural resource survey reports for the Session 7: The Historical Archaeology of Identity and Meaning Brandywine Creek watershed. In particular, sites were examined with regard to John McCarthy, Organizer and Chair topographic settings, chronological components, lithic distributions, and discovery methods. The goal of this research was to evaluate the watershed model developed 8:00 - 8:05 John McCarthy Introduction by the PHMC ( 1996) in response to legislative pressure forthe Commonwealth to perform state-permitted archeological surveys. Further, expectations were 8:05 - 8:25 James Gibb Beyond Status and Consumer Behavior: developed from the existing data with regard to sensitive topographic settings for Professions in Historical Archaeology prehistoric sites. Results of this research indicate that, given uneven data quality and reporting standards, it is problematic to establish policy. Recommenda_tions for 8:25- 8:45 Ed Chaney and Kirsti Uunila "It's like my fa mily ": Using further research include drainage-wide probabilistic surveys to obtain Archaeology to Create Identity representative �amples of site distributions. Such surveys will serve as a baseline against which the PASS-file data may be compared. 8:45 - 9:05 John McCarthy Individual and Communities Identities at the Cemetery: Some Implications of African-Influenced Burial Tolley, George A. Practices in Antebellum Philadelphia Th e Analysis of a Guilford_Aged Chipping Clusterfr om 44GY18 During the last two weeks of July, 2000, the George Washington and Jefferson 9:05 - 9:25 Ned Heite Genealogy as an Auxiliary Science to Archaeology National Forests sponsored a joint Archeological Society of Virginia Certification Field School and Passports in Time Project at the Fairwoods Livery Site (44GYI 8) 9:25 - 9:45 Jeanne A. Ward The Archaeology of the Burlington Friends in Grayson County, Virginia. This is the second field school the forests have Meetinghouse in Burlington, New Jersey: Belief, Behavior and sponsored to investigate the prehistoric use of Mount Rogers rhyolite at this site. Continuity in a Religious Community. This paper will address the results fromthe analysis of a Guilford aged chipping cluster that was discovered during this latter field school. This chipping cluster, 9:45 - I 0:00 Discussion unique to the site at this time, contained two Guilford projectile points with more than one hundred pieces of rhyolite debitage, flakes, and core fragments. The 10:00 - 10: 10 Break analysis of this material will be concentrated on identifying the variety of rhyolite pieces that formed this chipping cluster, any tools or utilized flakes within the cluster, and identify, if possible, particular knapping techniques utilized by the Contributed Papers -- Prehistoric Archaeology Session 8: Guilford people. Richard Sacchi, Chair

10:10- 10:30 Laura Galke Inferring Prehistoric Settlement Patterns Using Wagner, Daniel P., Darrin L. Lowery, John E. Foss and John S. Wah Phase I Archaeological Data A Time of Dust: Paleoindians and Loess on the EasternShore of Maryland Extensive deposits of loess on Maryland's Eastern Shore were presumably derived from glacial sediments carried to the region by the pre-tidal Susquehanna River

5 22 during the Pleistocene/Holocene transition. Lifted by wind from drying mud bars, 2:20 - 2:40 Charles Goode and William M. Gardner Observations on the silty material was broadly spread over adjacent uplands to form a surface Early Woodland Ceramics and Points from Deep Excavations in mantle as much as 2 m thick near Chesapeake Bay but thinning to <50 cm by 30 km the Virginia Potomac River Floodplain between Goose Creek to the east. Although no concerted effort has been undertaken to relate loessial and Selden Island soils and Paleoindian sites, a l 0,520 BP date for one buried surface argues that the deposition of loess was concurrent with Paleoindian occupation. Additionally, 2:40 - 2:50 Break recent shoreline surveys have recovered Clovis artifacts from subsoil levels or loessial soils. Together, these fi ndings suggest that unlike the near-surface context 2:50 -3:10 Richard J. Dent and Christine A. Jirikowic Accokeek Creek: formost Paleoindian sites in the central Delmarva, those closer to Chesapeake Bay Chronology and the Potomac Creek Complex are likely to occur at or below the deeper levels of strongly developed argillic horizons previously assumed to be culturally sterile. Usual shovel testing may 3: IO - 3:30 William P. Barse The Fletchers Boathouse Site and Its Place in therefore not be adequate to identify many Paleoindian sites. Archaeological Potomac Va lley Prehistory investigative approaches should be modified for loessial soils, and the distribution of loess deposits throughout the Middle Atlantic and Northeast more thoroughly 3:30 - 3:50 William C. Johnson Who Were Th ose Gals? Cordage Twist documented. Direction wid Ethnicity in the Potomac River Basin, Preliminary Evidence Suggesting Population Continuity Followed by Walker, Jesse Replacement during the Late Woodland Period Investigation of a Shell Midden ( J 8D0220) on Maryland'sEastern Shore 3:50 - 4:10 Jennifer Marston and William P. Barse Reconstructing a Recent investigations at l 8DO220 have revealed intact stratified archaeological Middle Woodland Household Vessel Assemblage deposits associated with the Terminal Archaic through the Contact periods. The site is located in a tidal marsh setting within the Choptank River Basin in Maryland. 4:10-4:15 Break Rising sea levels and tidal wetland formation have persevered cultural deposits in a saturated context. The large quantity of faunal remains recovered from shoreline collections and excavations attest to an enhanced state of preservation. The site has never been plowed. Townsend, Killens, and Hell Island ceramic types have been Session 6: Contributed Papers -- Prehistoric Archaeology recovered from the shell deposits. Soil horizons below the shell midden contain Josh Duncan, Chairperson Dames Quarter ceramics and stemmed projectile points. Contact period artifacts have been exposed fromthe uppermost portion of the shell midden. The effects of 4:15 - 4:35 Josh Duncan Mobility and Sedentism in the Northern Neck, AD shoreline erosion and redeposition have dramatically altered the cultural deposits. 1500-1 700

Wall, Robert and Heather Lapham 4:35 -4:55 Nancy H. Anthony and Michael F. Johnson Tool Production Material Culture of the Contact Period in the Upper Potomac Va lley: at the Lorton To wn Center Complex Chronological and Cultural Implications 4:55 -5:15 Jesse Walker Investigation of a Shell Midden ( I8D0220) on A synthesis of Contact Period material culture from the upper Potomac Valley is Maryland'sEastern Shore presented. This compilation of data from such sites as Herriot Farm, Pancake Island, and the Barton site includes artifacts of European manufacture or trade 5:15 - 5:35 Daniel Wagner, Darrin L. Lowery, John E. Foss, and John goods, and aboriginal ceramics. Ceramics are predominantly affiliated with S. Wah A Time of Dust: Paleoindians and Loess on the Eastern Susquehannock cultures dating from the late 1500s to the mid-I 600s. European Shore ofP. Maryland manufactured trade goods from the upper Potomac Valley sites include predominantly items of copper or brass and glass beads. The Susquehannock sequence begins with the Schultz phase and extends into the Washington Boro

4 23 Session 4: Public Archaeology phase. Utilizing what is known about the age and distribution of key trade items as David Bibler, Organizer and Chair well as the Susquehannock sequence fromsout h central Pennsylvania, a chronology forthe Susquehannock settlement of the upper Potomac Valley during the early fur I 0:00 - 10:20 Kevin Cunningham Connecting People and Our Past Th e trade period is suggested. This should serve to clarify the vague historical record Public, Cultural Resources and the Delaware Department of pertaining to early contact in the upper Potomac. Transportation Ward, Jeanne A. I 0:20 - 10:40 Dorothy Schlotthauer Krass and Beverly A. Chiarulli Th e Archaeology of the Burlington Friends Meetinghouse, Burlington, New Jersey: Enhancing Public Views of Archaeology: Initiatives from the Belief, Behavior, and Continuityin a Religious Community SAA Public Education Committee Proposed construction of a regional conferencecenter at the Friends' Meetinghouse th 10:40 - 11:00 Joe Baker City Island 1994 to 2000: A Retrospective in Burlington New Jersey threatened the reported site of the original 17 century meetinghouse. Archaeological investigations were undertaken to locate and 11:0 0 - 11:2 0 Varna G. Boyd and John P. McCarthy A Critical Perspeciive identify the site and then to recover structural information and sample associated on "Hands-on " Education/Volunteer Programming: Case artifactsprior to the site's destruction. The building was revealed to have originally Studies.from Cultural Resources Management been a hexagon in plan to which a rectangular addition was appended. This paper presents the history of the site, describes the excavations, and the results of artifact 11:2 0 - 11:40 Dwayne Scheid Public Archaeology at Mount Vernon: A analyses, including depositional analysis and analysis of the ceramics recovered. Descriptive Analysis of the Program's Development The discussion is grounded in an attempt to present an analysis of the behaviors and values represented, particularly in the context of Friends' beliefs and religious 11:40 - 12:00 Matthew Reeves Asking the Right Questions: Archaeologists practices and the special functions of the Burlington Meetinghouse as a regional and Descendent Communities center of Friends activity reflecting continuity in belief and behavior over 300 years.

I Saturday Afternoon, March 24 Wieland, Lynn-Marie An Attempt To Reconstruct Political Boundaries In Eighteenth CenturyRidge field, ? Session 5: Archaeology in the Potomac River Va lley: From Headwaters to Connecticut: Where is my Farm Tidewater (and in between .... ) Lithic analyses documents 8000 years of Native American occupation in and Tammy Bryant, John Mullen, Bill Gardner, and Joe Dent, Organizers and around Ridgefield, Connecticut. Archaeological evidence suggests that some sites Chairs were used from the Early Archaic through the Early Historic Period. Although sites and artifacts are relatively abundant for Archaic and Woodland periods, the Early I :00 - I :20 Robert Wall and Heather Lapham Material Culture of the Historic Period is only represented by bits and pieces of glass, lead musket balls, Contact Period in the Upper Potomac Valley: Chronological and and an occasional bit of metal. Consequently, we have come to rely on the property CulturalImp lications deeds between the European settlers and the Native Americans in the Connecticut/New York border region to give us an idea of how the Native I :20 - 1:40 Tammy Bryant Archaeological Overview of Recent Excavations Americans, the Dutch, and English dealt with one another and their political 011 the Potomac River Floodplain from Goose Creek to the River boundaries. These deeds also document the confusing political agendas of the Channel Back of Selden Island Province of New York and the Colony of Connecticut.

I :40 - 2:00 John Mullen On the Pleistocene Terrace Back of Selden Island

2:00 - 2:20 John E. Foss and Daniel P. Wagner Soils of the Te rrace Sequence along the Potomac River, Loudoun County, Virginia

3 24 PARTICIPANTS ' AFFILIA TIONS 3:40 - 4:00 Matthew Emerson Th e Search fo r Anthony Johnson's AND EMAIL ADDRESSES Settlement on Virginia's EasternShore

4:00 -4:20 Patrick L. O'Neill " ... near where stood an old house. " - A Nancy H. Anthony, Greenhorne and O'Mara, Inc., [email protected] Late I 8 Century Delaware Brick Clamp th Joe Baker, Indiana University of Pennsylvania/Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, [email protected] 4:20 - 4:40 Michael Clem Plantation Landscapes: Making Practical Use of the Information Provided Michael B. Barber, USDA Forest Service, [email protected] 4:40 -5:00 Lynn-Marie Wieland An Attempt to Reconstruct Political William Barse, URS Corporation, [email protected] Boundaries In Eighteenth Century Ridgefield, Connecticut: David Bibler, KCI Technologies, Inc., [email protected] Where is my Farm?

Bradley Bowden, Gray and Pape, Inc., [email protected] Friday Evening, March 23

Varna Boyd, Greenhorne and O'Mara, vboyd @g-and-o.com 8:00 Awards Tammy Bryant, Catholic University, tammy203 @juno.com Saturday Morning, March 24 Kurt Carr, Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission, [email protected] Edward Chaney, Jefferson Patterson Park and Museum, Session 3: Take Me A way From the River: An Examination of Inter-riverine [email protected] Prehistoric Settlement in Virginia Bradley Bowden, Organizer and Chair Beverly A. Chiarulli, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] 8:00 - 8:20 Michael B. Barber Small Sites on the Appalachian Mountain Michael Clem, Thunderbird Archaeological Associates/American University, [email protected] Slopes: Changes in Altitudes, Changes in Attitudes

Elizabeth Crowell, Parsons Engineering Science, 8:20 - 8:40 Bradley Bowden Inter-Riverine Prehistoric Settlement [email protected] Patterning in the Richmond Area: Alternative Research Methods and Comparative Data Kevin Cunningham, Delaware Department of Transportation, [email protected] 8:40 - 9:00 Mike Johnson Interior Small Stream and Upland Prehistoric Eric Deetz, APV A/University of Leicester, [email protected] Site Patterns in Fairfax County - GIS Modeling and Interpretations Joe Dent , American University, [email protected] 9:00 -9:20 Michael J. Klein Discovering Sites Unseen, Exca vating Unforeseen Sites Joshua Duncan, Mary Washington College, [email protected]

Carole Ebright, Maryland State Highway Association, [email protected] 9:20 - 9:40 Carole Nash Paddling Upstream: Models and the Importance of Interriverine Sites Matt Emerson, Southern Illinois University, [email protected] 9:40 - 9:50 Lee Tippett, Discussant John Foss, Soils International, Inc., [email protected] 9:50 - 10:00 Break

25 2 Laura Galk:, .faryland Archaeological Conservation Laboratory, MIDDLE ATLANTIC ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE gal ·[email protected] William Gardner, Catholic University, wmgjmw@ ix.nctcom.com March 23 - 25, 2001 Ocean City, Maryland James Gibb, [email protected] Charles Goode, Catholic University, [email protected] PROGRAM Ned Heite, Heite Consulting, [email protected] I Friday Afternoon, March 23 Philip Hill, Archeological Testing and Consulting, Inc., [email protected]

Session l: Prehistoric Settlement Patternsin Up land Settings Christine Jirikowic, Gunston Hall Plantation, [email protected] Kurt Carr and Patricia Miller, Organizers and Chairs Michael Johnson, County Archaeological Services, l :00 - l :05 Patricia Miller [email protected] Introduction William Johnson, Michael Baker Jr., Inc., [email protected] 1:05-1 :25 Kurt W. Carr Douglas C. Kellogg, John Milner Associates, Th e Development of Prehistoric Settlement [email protected] l :25 - l :45 BeverlyPattern Research A. Chiarulli Priorities in Pennsylvania Robert K.ingsley, John Milner Associates, [email protected] Up land Sites in Th e Conemaugh-Blacklick Michael Klein, Wa tershed Mary Washington College, [email protected] I :45 - 2:05 Philip A. Perazio and William J. Meyer Dorothy Schlotthauer Krass, Society forAmerican Archaeology, Th e Conodoguinet [email protected] PeterWa tershed E. Siegel, Dougl�s C. Kellogg, Robert G. Kingsley 2:05 - 2:25 Darrin Lowery, H), L. Temple University, [email protected] Jennifer Marston, Brandywine Creek Wa tershed (Watershed Chester, URS, rabbit6 I I @hoimail.com 2:25 - 2:35 Lancaster,Patricia Miller and Delaware Counties, Pennsylvania John P. McCarthy, Greenhorne and O'Mara, [email protected] Summary of the Up land Settlement Pattern Studies Bernard K. Means, Alexandria Archaeology, 2:35 - 2:45 Kurt Carr [email protected] Final Remarks 2:45 - 3:05 Dean Snow, William Meyer, Kittatinny Archaeological Research, Inc., [email protected] Patricia Miller, 3:05 - 3:20 Break Discussant KCI Technologies, Inc., [email protected] David Mudge, New Jersey Department of Transportation, arky

Architecture at James Fort 26 Patrick O'Neill, Parsons Engineering Science, patrick.o'[email protected] Edward Otter, Salisbury State University, [email protected]

Philip Perazio, Kittatinny Archaeological Research, Inc.,[email protected] 31 ANNUAL MEETING OF THE 5T MIDDLE ATLANTIC ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE Matthew Reeves, Montpelier Foundation, [email protected] Richard Sacchi, Fairfax County Park Authority, [email protected] MARCH 23-25, 2001 Douglas Sanford, Mary Washington College, [email protected] Dwayne Scheid, Mount Vernon Archaeology Department, [email protected] PRINCESS ROYALE HOTEL OCEAN CITY, MARYLAND Peter Siegel, John Milner Associates, [email protected]

Dean R. Snow, The Pennsylvania State University, drs [email protected] Delaware Historic Preservation Office, [email protected] Faye Stocum, OFFICERS AND ORGANIZERS Lee Tippett, Virginia Department of Historic Resources, [email protected]

George Tolley, U.S. Forest Service, [email protected] PRESIDENT , EDWARD OTTER Kirsti Uunila, Jefferson Patterson Park and Museum, [email protected] PRESIDENT-EL�CT MICHAEL BARBER Daniel Wagner, Geo-Sci Consultants, Inc., [email protected] TREASURER John S. Wah, University of Maryland, [email protected] CAROL EBRIGHT

Jesse Walker, Temple University, [email protected] RECORDING SECRETARY DOUGLAS SANFORD Towson State University, [email protected] Robert Wall, MEMBERSHIPSECRETARY FAYESTOCUM Jeanne Ward, Applied Archaeology and History Associates, Inc., [email protected] BOARD MEMBER AT LARGE DAVID MUDGE

JOURNAL EDITOR ROGER MOELLER

PROGRAM CHAIRPERSONS ELIZABETH CROWELL CAROLE NASH

ARRANGEMENTS CHAIRPERSON KURT CARR

27 1 ' V( } 1 . rp,,-vq-1c 1\,-�-1.,,; N,1)(��-i ,[,;;;-if,�., .;·,• .,, ;-y"i;; {"'.·, ,)1,1'� ' , �: • , , -< ;,�:)' C'}f/,, '> · j '''l,;:; 'P..,,''i(• /I ;, . n:, .• , , f t l 4 t' ., ,,_ •.") 1 f, i U,d d,, u� u.c c, q · -�-J''J'? 1he 'J)evel()-"}}'i1,,()})j_:, 01:· 1)rehistoric Settfi-. m?nt �PatJ·;:_�y,:I '/)/) ''"�t·,,)<; ,;,,_,, . 1 ·r·-� ,u:f f ,,U .. : /.vt-� d t .,!, < ,,(r 1, t, Hd/L,t}, {,,"' ( at . . ...} r,/ IP ,·�rv,t'''J. Vf.",'(? f O ,{· <<1.(\ . . .:> p >'·,;, p ''P ·' ... ../ '? {; .()/"'i)': -- K, , . ., "' � ' ( . . t ('., d... U-:. ,..: l .,,·., , .., . f ,(./(A, . !:. J ,, t C , • ' ,' (A, . \:, f .H .,(,( , . J ' M,l . (,,·r: •�. - . nv \.... (01ff [ru_ ,; Ock }v 1'·,,r,:,·h, Tt1 (.) t'cn '}. t lF '�. t, ,,.,, {i vf, r ;• ,, ,J l. ·.. Cr.. (..'J/}k; � ·''-- '}\, V\?. ( ,. "· C)r .':>·h ... :.(�, ' , , {.,rl ,I. C·:, n-r.;.. r u.,,;.-{ �/, J. } i f"'f'J. } .( ':,,. �/,- (,l , d..AA.r ': r{,,. ca.':,, ... (, C l ' l.Jef1�1-1-rare C'mm,ties, 1'\nrnsyfvania_; Surnrrwry (_f the 'I{pfc.nu( Sc�ttfornenL 'Pattern Studies; .?l' t rchifecture at J;;unes ..Fort; 'The Search, JcJ.V -.�lnLfiony Jofrn3on s scUiemenf:' on "\/irjr{n.i-vu.ll,,f· .·n," 'j'}v·)·,,1 ..(1.: .1: ,:t.-w /' _ f_ ,;._ _,,,,p ,· /· �, ,. vi, .,,,_ - . . . u,U,� . U1,,,t,u,tOt1. L (,1 l't,.�--Ci-�_,, e.. , __ :,'d, ,<,;,t.fJ,�, 1 J & •• c (_i, •.. (,d. ,,,..'>�'.- t_} t 'r� -- ✓, �J tJt ut0u d.t d _., (, v ,(rc(t, Jt.n.• . d , . 1 p.. .

'P ''['(FJ.S''T"("{. 1 C h ? . 1 .. .. , ,· .. ·r•1. A.f""' .,,'..: [,, . . t...✓ .. • . • , JVHf,\ T ... , ... 1 rr:,u .1. \,.(' L J , .. �- iA, .. •. . 'P··[;��- u ,' d, H.. u ,, ..:.;, } ,', t , C.. , .t .L .. � · ., .: ' I. .., t "" <:,,.i' , . , . i. y ' UA -fjl' ,:J • C (,. \ .. , ,.., ' , ,,-,:' , r w ... ·;;n--•·r)•, <., .'> . < Ifie ;,.. ·,("Pcu.,vr{ari' Jr f'(.''iafifecPl'[,l;.'.' - . - ,Ci ;Ir(} /'mn1.c ·t1.czrt· 'lr'fiere , ·., ·., .t�J;,, u. ( n L .l \'rvtafTH, l ,.. '·i{e··I, . ., ()}'f • . ;, _:,;\.ppa(iu:fiian _'.j\,Jtninta in S{cy1es: Cfia:n1Ji:?s in .,14.fhhnfe:;·, c·.:io nges i.n .?\.thJ'ud;?s; Jn1�·£rrM1Uvertne Prcfi i.stor :c Settfonwnt 'Pa'l:terni:ng in Uie R,tcfrrnond ,.A.rea.:.. >1..tl-ernative :Research :·�,teth.ods: anrf Ci Strercrn d,nil

l-Voudfon!.IPeriod; :Rccons{ructine Cl :,A/(;y{fie rn .7\fr::t·fo.�, .>tl) 1soo M.1700; �Ti)O( . . ''.,(. f � ,, . . •'t p J •r < > ,., ,., , ('' [''.:' . ''f.),.· -� .{" , .. �-., .,,,, I f' • , ., . •; ("' ·' s; , -f--,.;, l"'i '� Tn � ·i /JO f .. ,: ,,, .., cf;,.} i -f - n i, P'f't( 1-,, ?(';' ,') ?•,if .<,rn,. :1·:."n }" n 1( - . 1 1 . , ,\, J.nv�.- \!.. � . ../ ,.,!(,v/At� F.,,,1, (. .tO,,.. ./ ,t,.___ , _J ,.. . ?�--1 . ,,; ,,,.. .•./ t-U., .. ,{ !"',·•, ;:,- ::vv <.: � 01,'f). ;} "'· r(;-(1.Uctf.{J:/ vk .u,(, _.,(;-Y, cu ..7· -·(,d,f.,·"i. .. C,u,cl , .. ,.l, ,,l'V'.TJ'.""'}f;,'·,· -.,., r.:�c,,I..,,,. , h,,.,, .. ,. ..,. r 'Trrne (!{ 1Just: Pa{i:?oi..ndiims an;;( Loess ()n Nie �.Ci,,b·tern Shore .-�r:Jvlaryfond; Beyond Status a Consit:n1e·- Befiavior: < 1 · . . { ''J....- f �t:;, . ..<: , ...(/ t ...() 'I1 //,) ..<'l f.: "I't ftF.i.e nry fann ·-�1'·: 'Uslnt .Arr'fia! 1 ,. f'f.,� l . . �'. .)[j,,, , t.: ,/.''..,,"''f'

OCEAN CITY, MARYLAND J �PaUerns 'Usirw �Phase 1 ,)lrdiaeofr>ffLca( 1.)o:La; '{fie ,,Tina( ·rronUe-r: -�pace� flirneJ an,c{ Cosrno4}8:1 m,. 7 refrLstoru..· . Sou,th tves(e rn :Pe11nsy(van ia; 7fie .An_a f\Jsi.->' {_'fa (hUf/£Jrc,{�5tf.Jed. C'f;y:y,:;f-ng c•f.i15tevf1,-oni 4-1{i Jf 18; __ A.straZe neca SU-e 2 (7-?\!C'-JJ-55): 1 r p '-' .)ln Ury;(o-1,-;!e,d·'qplr-1n,,{ S-U-e ht the 1>efc 1va:re r fedtrwnt; ..A : refrrninary :Exan1i:nation. (�( Ctires Su:rface Colfocle£ frmn t/11:1- Vvima-mson Ta{i�oindlan Site in 1.'hn:wic{die County,? ,Virginia