DOCSLIB.ORG

Land Preservation, Parks and Recreation Plan for Prince George's

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Land Preservation, Parks and Recreation Plan for Prince George's LAND PRESERVATION, PARKS AND RECREATION PLAN for Prince George’s County, Maryland 2017 IMPLEMENTATION THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION COMMISSIONERS Prince George’s County Montgomery County Planning Board Planning Board Elizabeth M. Hewlett, Chairman Casey Anderson, Chairman Dorothy F. Bailey, Vice Chairman Marye Wells-Harley, Vice Chairman William M. Doerner Gerald R. Cichy Manuel R. Geraldo Norman Dreyfuss A. Shuanise Washington Natali Fani - Gonzalez DEPARTMENT HEADS Patricia Colihan Barney Executive Director Joseph C. Zimmerman Secretary-Treasurer Adrian R. Gardner General Counsel Ronnie Gathers, Director Department of Parks and Recreation Prince George’s County Andree Green Checkley, Director Department of Planning Prince George’s County Prince George’s County Department of Parks and Recreation 6600 Kenilworth Avenue Riverdale, Maryland 20737 Prince George’s County Planning Department 14741 Governor Oden Bowie Drive Upper Marlboro, MD 20773 i This page intentionally left blank. ii Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 8 Chapter 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Purposes of the Plan ..................................................................................................................... 9 1.2 Role of The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission .................................... 10 1.3 Role of the Price George’s Couty District Coucil ................................................................... 11 1.4 Formula 2040 Functional Master Plan ........................................................................................ 11 1.5 Price George’s Couty Geeral Pla ......................................................................................... 12 1.6 Maryland Statewide Planning Initiatives .................................................................................... 14 1.7 Regional Planning ........................................................................................................................ 14 1.8 Price George’s Couty Deographic Profile............................................................................. 14 1.9 Geography ................................................................................................................................... 17 Chapter 2 Recreation and Parks ................................................................................................................ 18 2.1 Overview of the Parks and Recreation System ........................................................................... 18 2.2 Goals and Objectives for Parks and Recreation .......................................................................... 23 2.3 Implementing Programs ............................................................................................................. 28 2.4 Inventories of Existing Parks and Recreation Facilities ............................................................... 33 2.5 Measuring User Demand ............................................................................................................ 40 2.6 Level of Service Analysis ............................................................................................................. 47 2.7 Park Equity Analysis .................................................................................................................... 76 Chapter 3 Natural Resources Land Conservation ................................................................................... 86 3.1 Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 86 3.2 Benefits of Maintaining and Enhancing Natural Resources Lands ............................................. 87 3.3 Natural Resource Land ................................................................................................................ 88 3.4 Goals for Natural Resource Land Conservation .......................................................................... 92 3.5. Inventories of Protected Natural Resource Lands ...................................................................... 94 3.6 Mapping ...................................................................................................................................... 97 3.7 Implementing Ordinances and Programs ................................................................................. 105 Chapter 4 Agricultural Land Preservation ........................................................................................ 108 4.1 Overview of Agricultural Land Preservation in the County ...................................................... 108 4.2 Goals and Policies for Agricultural Land Preservation .............................................................. 110 4.3 Inventory of Preserved Agricultural Land ................................................................................. 112 4.4 Programs to Protect Agricultural Land ..................................................................................... 114 4.5 Other Lands and Protection Mechanisms of Preserving Land for Agriculture ......................... 115 iii Chapter 5 Historical and Cultural Resource Preservation ................................................................... 119 5.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 119 5.2 Inventories of Historic Resources ............................................................................................. 119 5.3 Existing Preservation Framework ............................................................................................. 122 5.4 Recommendations .................................................................................................................... 130 iv Maps 1.1 Physiographic Provinces of Maryland and Delaware 2.1 Cricket Fields 2.2 Distance from M-NCPPC Developed Parks 2.3 Areas within ¼ Mile and ½ Mile of an Existing Trail 2.4 Aquatics Classifications and Levels of Service 2.5 Diamond Field Classifications and Levels of Service 2.6 Dog Park Classifications and Levels of Service 2.7 Hard Court Classifications and Levels of Service 2.8 Parkland by Jurisdiction 2.9 M-NCPPC Developed Parkland Classifications 2.10 Picnic Areas Classifications and Levels of Service 2.11 Playground Classifications and Levels of Service 2.12 Rectangular Field Classifications and Levels of Service 2.13 Skate Park Classifications and Levels of Service 2.14 Trails Classifications and Levels of Service 2.15 Public Water Access for Boats, Canoes and Kayaks 2.16 Transforming Neighborhoods Initiative Recreational Amenities 3.1 Priority Preservation Area 3.2 Rural Legacy Area 3.3 Green Print Areas 3.4 Public Parks and Recreation Properties 3.5 Natural Resources Lands Protected Through Long-Term Conservation Easements, Licenses and Agreements 3.6 Homeowner’s Association Land Preserved by Deed Covenants 4.1 Agricultural Easements and Priority Preservation Areas, Prince George’s County 4.2 M-NCPPC Land Leased for Farming 5.1 Map of Publicly-Owned Historical Resources in Prince George’s County v Tables Table 2.1 Summary of Major Sources of Funds for FY 2012 to FY 2017 CIP Table 2.2 Percentages from Each Funding Source Table 2.3 M-NCPPC & Municipalities POS Allocations Table 2.4 Parks and Recreation Land Providers Table 2.5 Municipal Parklands Table 2.6 Golf Activity Table 2.7 Athletic Field Rental Table 2.8 Outdoor Pool Activity Table 2.9 Watkins Nature Center Program Activity Table 2.10 Old Maryland Farm Table 2.11 Park Permits: Shelters and Park Buildings Table 2.12 Recommended and Existing Levels of Service by Facility Type and Class Table 2.13 Aquatics Classifications and Levels of Service Table 2.14 Diamond Field Classifications and Levels of Service Table 2.15 Dog Park Classifications and Levels of Service Table 2.16 Hard Court Classifications and Levels of Service Table 2.17 M-NCPPC Parkland Classifications and Level of Service Table 2.18 M-NCPPC Developed Parkland Classifications and Level of Service Table 2.19 Picnic Areas Classifications and Levels of Service Table 2.20 Playground Classifications and Levels of Service Table 2.21 Rectangular Field Classifications and Levels of Service Table 2.22 Skate Park Classifications and Level of Service Table 2.23 Trails Classifications and Levels of Service Table 2.24 Recreation Facilities in TNIs Table 2.25 Prince George’s County TNI Socio-Economic Characteristics Table 2.26 Proposed Site-Specific Projects for the FY 2018-2023 CIP Table 3.1 Public Lands Table 3.2 Federal Lands Table 3.3 M-NCPPC Lands Table 3.4 Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Land Table 3.5 State of Maryland DNR Lands iii Charts Chart 1.1 Racial Composition Chart 1.2 Population by Age Chart 1.3 Income Profile Chart 2.1 M-NCPPC Department of Parks and Recreation Organization Chart Chart 2.2 Parks, Trails and Recreation Facilities Households Visit Most Often Chart 2.3 Household Need for Parks and Recreation Facilities Chart 2.4 Parks and Recreation Facilities that are Most Important Chart 2.5 Glassmanor Race and Ethnicity Chart 2.6 Hillcrest Heights Race and Ethnicity Chart 2.7 Kentland Race and Ethnicity Chart 2.8 Bladensburg Race and Ethnicity Chart
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nanjemoy and Mattawoman Creek Watersheds
    Defining the Indigenous Cultural Landscape for The Nanjemoy and Mattawoman Creek Watersheds Prepared By: Scott M. Strickland Virginia R. Busby Julia A. King With Contributions From: Francis Gray • Diana Harley • Mervin Savoy • Piscataway Conoy Tribe of Maryland Mark Tayac • Piscataway Indian Nation Joan Watson • Piscataway Conoy Confederacy and Subtribes Rico Newman • Barry Wilson • Choptico Band of Piscataway Indians Hope Butler • Cedarville Band of Piscataway Indians Prepared For: The National Park Service Chesapeake Bay Annapolis, Maryland St. Mary’s College of Maryland St. Mary’s City, Maryland November 2015 ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this project was to identify and represent the Indigenous Cultural Landscape for the Nanjemoy and Mattawoman creek watersheds on the north shore of the Potomac River in Charles and Prince George’s counties, Maryland. The project was undertaken as an initiative of the National Park Service Chesapeake Bay office, which supports and manages the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail. One of the goals of the Captain John Smith Trail is to interpret Native life in the Middle Atlantic in the early years of colonization by Europeans. The Indigenous Cultural Landscape (ICL) concept, developed as an important tool for identifying Native landscapes, has been incorporated into the Smith Trail’s Comprehensive Management Plan in an effort to identify Native communities along the trail as they existed in the early17th century and as they exist today. Identifying ICLs along the Smith Trail serves land and cultural conservation, education, historic preservation, and economic development goals. Identifying ICLs empowers descendant indigenous communities to participate fully in achieving these goals.
    [Show full text]
  • To View the 10-Year Solid Waste Management Plan for 2020-2029
    “Prince George’s County 2020 – 2029 Solid Waste Management Plan” CR-50-2020 (DR-2) 2020 – 2029 COMPREHENSIVE TEN-YEAR SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN Prince George’s County, Maryland Acknowledgements Marilyn E. Rybak-Naumann, Resource Recovery Division, Associate Director Denice E. Curry, Resource Recovery Division, Recycling Section, Section Manager Darryl L. Flick, Resource Recovery Division, Special Assistant Kevin Roy B. Serrona, Resource Recovery Division, Recycling Section, Planner IV Antoinette Peterson, Resource Recovery Division, Administrative Aide Michael A. Bashore, Stormwater Management Division, Planner III/GIS Analyst With Thanks To all of the agencies and individuals who contributed data “Prince George’s County 2020 – 2029 Solid Waste Management Plan” CONTENTS INTRODUCTION I. State Requirements for Preparation of the Plan.…………………………………..1 II. Plan Summary…………………………………………………………………….. 1 A. Solid Waste Generation………………………………………………………. 2 B. Solid Waste Collection……………………………………………………….. 2 C. Solid Waste Disposal…………………………………………………………. 2 D. Recycling……………………………………………………………………... 2 E. Public Information and Cleanup Programs………………………………….... 3 III. Place Holder – Insertion of MDE’s Approval Letter for Adopted Plan……………4 CHAPTER I POLICIES AND ORGANIZATION I. Planning Background……………………………………………………………... I-1 II. Solid Waste Management Terms…………………………………………………. I-1 III. County Goals Statement………………………………………………………….. I-2 IV. County Objectives and Policies Concerning Solid Waste Management………..... I-3 A. General Objectives of the Ten-Year Solid Waste Management Plan………... I-4 B. Guidelines and Policies regarding Solid Waste Facilities……………………. I-4 V. Governmental Responsibilities…………………………………………………… I-5 A. Prince George’s County Government………………………………………… I-5 B. Maryland Department of the Environment…………………………………… I-9 C. Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission…………………. I-9 D. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission (WSSC)………………………. I-9 VI. State, Local, and Federal Laws…………………………………………………… I-9 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Bladensburg Prehistoric Background
    Environmental Background and Native American Context for Bladensburg and the Anacostia River Carol A. Ebright (April 2011) Environmental Setting Bladensburg lies along the east bank of the Anacostia River at the confluence of the Northeast Branch and Northwest Branch of this stream. Formerly known as the East Branch of the Potomac River, the Anacostia River is the northernmost tidal tributary of the Potomac River. The Anacostia River has incised a pronounced valley into the Glen Burnie Rolling Uplands, within the embayed section of the Western Shore Coastal Plain physiographic province (Reger and Cleaves 2008). Quaternary and Tertiary stream terraces, and adjoining uplands provided well drained living surfaces for humans during prehistoric and historic times. The uplands rise as much as 300 feet above the water. The Anacostia River drainage system flows southwestward, roughly parallel to the Fall Line, entering the Potomac River on the east side of Washington, within the District of Columbia boundaries (Figure 1). Thin Coastal Plain strata meet the Piedmont bedrock at the Fall Line, approximately at Rock Creek in the District of Columbia, but thicken to more than 1,000 feet on the east side of the Anacostia River (Froelich and Hack 1975). Terraces of Quaternary age are well-developed in the Bladensburg vicinity (Glaser 2003), occurring under Kenilworth Avenue and Baltimore Avenue. The main stem of the Anacostia River lies in the Coastal Plain, but its Northwest Branch headwaters penetrate the inter-fingered boundary of the Piedmont province, and provided ready access to the lithic resources of the heavily metamorphosed interior foothills to the west.
    [Show full text]
  • NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5
    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5 DATABASE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION AND DATA DICTIONARY 1 June 2013 Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Prepared By: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 By Jacqueline Johnson Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin To receive additional copies of the report please call or write: The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301-984-1908 Funds to support the document The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.0; Database Design Documentation And Data Dictionary was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency Grant CB- CBxxxxxxxxxx-x Disclaimer The opinion expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the U.S. Government, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the several states or the signatories or Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia or the District of Columbia. ii The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Park Pavilions and Designated Picnic Areas for Rental
    PARK PAVILIONS AND DESIGNATED PICNIC AREAS FOR RENTAL PARK ADDRESS Zip Pavilion Electricity Area Picnic Grill Capacity Gazebo Playground Basketball Court TennisCourt Field Ball AthleticField OutdoorPool WadingPool Skateboard BoatLaunce GolfCourse Center Rec Fee CARROLL PARK: AREA 1 MONROE ST. NR. WASHINGTON BLVD 21230 Y 100 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y $85 CARROLL PARK: AREA 2 MONROE ST. NR. WASHINGTON BLVD 21230 Y 100 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y $85 CLIFTON PARK DELEPORTE GROVE INDIAN HEAD DRIVE 21218 Y 75 Y Y Y Y $85 CLIFTON PARK BANDSHELL GROVE HARFORD RD & ST. LO DR 21218 Y 150 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y $85 DRUID HILL PARK - ATRIUM PAVILION RED ROAD & EAST DRIVE 21217 Y Y Y 100 Y Y $115 DRUID HILL PARK - CHINESE PAVILION SWAN DRIVE & EAST DRIVE 21217 Y Y Y 175 Y $170 DRUID HILL PARK - COLUMBUS PAVILION MANSION HOUSE DRIVE & EAST DRIVE 21217 Y Y Y 150 Y $140 DRUID HILL PARK - LIBERTY PAVILION LIBERTY HEIGHTS & BEECHWOOD 21217 Y Y Y 150 $140 DRUID HILL PARK - PARKIE EAST GROVE RED ROAD & EAST DRIVE 21217 Y 100 $85 DRUID HILL PARK - PARKIE LAKESIDE PAVILION RED ROAD & EAST DRIVE 21217 Y Y Y 150 Y Y $140 DRUID HILL PARK - PARKIE WEST GROVE RED ROAD & EAST DRIVE 21217 Y 100 $85 DRUID HILL PARK - SUNDIAL GROVE SWAN DRIVE 21217 Y 100 $85 DRUID HILL PARK - SUNDIAL PAVILION SWAN DRIVE 21217 Y Y Y 75 $115 DRUID HILL PARK - SUSQUEHANNOCK PAVILION EAST DRIVE 21217 Y Y Y 150 Y Y Y Y $140 DRUID HILL PARK - SWANN PAVILION RED ROAD & SHOP ROAD 21217 Y Y Y 100 Y Y $115 GWYNNS FALLS/LEAKIN PARK #1 4921 WINDSOR MILL RD 21217 Y Y 100 Y Y $85 GWYNNS FALLS/LEAKIN PARK #2 4921 WINDSOR MILL RD 21217 Y Y Y 100 Y Y $85 GWYNNS FALLS/LEAKIN PARK #3 4921 WINDSOR MILL RD 21217 Y Y Y 100 Y Y $85 GWYNNS FALLS/LEAKIN PARK #4 4921 WINDSOR MILL RD 21217 Y Y Y 100 Y Y $85 GWYNNS FALLS/WINANS MEADOW FRANKLINTOWN RD 21217 Y Y Y Y 200 $200 HANLON PARK 2400 LONGWOOD ST 21216 Y Y 100 Y $115 HERRING RUN PARK HARFORD RD & ARGONNE DR.
    [Show full text]
  • Native News, September/October 2006
    Native News Newsletter of the Maryland Native Plant Society September/October 2006 Volume 6 Number 5 Inside This Issue: Upcoming Monthly Meetings President’s Letter Page 2 “Goldenrods, Asters, and Thoroughworts” ~ Tuesday, September 26, 7:30 pm MNPS Contacts White Oak Library – Large Meeting Room Page 2 ~ The Asteraceae (Aster Family) is a large and diverse family that is MNPS Announcements especially well-developed in North America. Maryland and the mid- Page 3 Atlantic region are home to a particularly rich diversity of native plants ~ in the Aster Family. Join botanist Rod Simmons for an in-depth Upcoming Chapter Events Page 3 presentation of the many native species of Solidago, Eupatorium, and ~ Aster (formerly) in Maryland. The talk will focus on identification of Wildflower in Focus the common species, but will also include uncommon and rare ones Page 4 and habitats throughout the state where they may be found. Live plant ~ material will be available for hands-on identification. Late Summer/Fall Field Trips Page 5 “The Importance of Hybridization in the ~ Invasive Exotic Plant Systematic Evolution of Oaks” Removal Workdays Tuesday, October 24, 7:30 pm Page 6 White Oak Library – Large Meeting Room ~ General Announcements The oaks are one of North America’s most widespread and important Page 7 trees. Nearly 80 native species of oaks occur in North America, not including the numerous natural hybrids and app. 100 species in Mexico. Maryland is one of the most diverse areas in the east for oaks, with 21 of the 41 oak species native to the eastern U.S., not including hybrids.
    [Show full text]
  • Mdenvironment
    MDEnvironment Volume VI, No. 7 Maryland Department of the Environment November 2002 EPA awards Just $8.9 million playing around MDENIVRONMENT PHOTO for water COURTESY OF ROBERTA DORSCH State agency workers programs and 200 volunteers built a scrap tire play- The U.S. Environmental Protection ground at Smallwood Agency has awarded $8.9 million to the State Park in Charles Maryland Department of the Environment County starting Oct. (MDE) Oct. 30 to improve drinking water 17 and completed the systems and protect drinking water sup- project less than three plies. The state will contribute $1.8 million days later. To learn in matching funds. more and view a gal- “Our country has one of the best sup- lery of images from its plies of safe, clean drinking water in the construction turn to world. This grant is an important step in Page 6. keeping the Maryland drinking water sup- ply healthy,” said Donald S. Welsh, re- gional administrator for EPA’s mid-Atlan- Regional haze may obscure fall’s beauty tic region. About $6.4 million of the funding will be By Bob Maddox disappointed when they find the view is ob- used to provide low interest loans that com- The autumn season has arrived and many scured by haze. Haze consists of small air- munities can use to improve drinking water Marylanders are making travel plans to look borne particles of air pollution such as sul- systems with projects that could include at colorful foliage and fall vistas. People will fates from sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrates, or- upgrading treatment plants, replacing stor- be eagerly driving to places hoping to see ganic carbon, elemental carbon and crust- age tanks, consolidating inadequate facili- beautiful scenery.
    [Show full text]
  • Shoreline Situation Report Stafford County, Virginia
    W&M ScholarWorks Reports 1975 Shoreline Situation Report Stafford County, Virginia Carl H. Hobbs III Virginia Institute of Marine Science Gary F. Anderson Virginia Institute of Marine Science Dennis W. Owen Virginia Institute of Marine Science Peter Rosen Virginia Institute of Marine Science Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/reports Part of the Environmental Monitoring Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Recommended Citation Hobbs, C. H., Anderson, G. F., Owen, D. W., & Rosen, P. (1975) Shoreline Situation Report Stafford County, Virginia. Special Report In Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering Number 79. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, William & Mary. https://doi.org/10.21220/V5PB01 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Reports by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Shoreline Situation Report ST AFFORD COUNTY, VIRGINIA Special Report In Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering Number 79 Chesapeake Research Consortium Report Number 13 Supported by the National Science Foundation, Research Applied to National Needs Program NSF Grant Nos. GI 34869 and GI 38973 to the Chesapeake Research Consortium, Inc. Published With Funds Provided to the Commonwealth by the Office of Coastal Zone Management National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Grant No. 04-5-158-50001 VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCE Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062 1975 Shoreline Situation Report ST AFFORD COUNTY, VIRGINIA Special Report In Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering Number 79 Chesapeake Research Consortium Report Number 13 Prepared by: Carl H.
    [Show full text]
  • Section III: County Profile
    Section III: County Profile Approved General Plan | 51 SECTION III: COUNTY PROFILE 52 | PLAN Prince George’s 2035 SECTION III: COUNTY PROFILE County Profile and Analysis .....54 Assets and Challenges ............. 72 Indicates that the definition of a word or term may be found in the Glossary of Terms, which starts on page 282. Approved General Plan | 53 County Profile and Analysis COUNTY PROFILE AND ANALYSIS County Profile and Analysis Understanding who Prince George’s County is today and who it is becoming is critical to developing effective policies and strategies to meet the needs of current and future residents. Regional Context Prince George’s County consists of 498 square miles (approximately 320,000 acres). It is bounded by Howard County to the north, Anne Arundel County and Calvert County to the east, Charles County to the south, and Montgomery County, Fairfax County, Virginia, and the District of Columbia to the west (see Map 5). Prince George’s County is located within the Washington metropolitan area, which is home to 5.6 million residents and 3.9 million jobs. The region’s strong and diverse economy is fueled by federal spending that has weathered recent recessions and nurtured growing research, commerce, information, and technology sectors. Municipalities Prince George’s County has 27 incorporated municipalities which help provide a range of critical services for County residents (see Public Facilities Element). Demographic Profile Population With an estimated population of 881,130 in 2012, Prince George’s County is the third most populous jurisdiction in the Washington metropolitan area, following Fairfax County (1,118,602), Virginia and neighboring Montgomery County (1,004,709).
    [Show full text]
  • JBAB Inducts Inaugural Group of Honorary Commanders
    Search DVIDS... JBAB Inducts inaugural group of honorary commanders Photo By Senior Airman Kevin Tanenbaum | U.S. Air Force Col. Erica Rabe,... read more WASHINGTON, D.C., DC, UNITED STATES 05.14.2021 Story by Senior Airman Kevin Tanenbaum Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling Subscribe 6 JOINT BASE ANACOSTIA-BOLLING, Washington, D.C.- Sixteen units from across Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling inducted their first group of honorary commanders at a ceremony in the Bolling Club, on May 14, 2021. The Honorary Commanders program serves as a vehicle to connect Team JBAB with key leaders in the surrounding community as the program aims to increase understanding of military culture and support of its various missions in the National Capital Region, as well as cultivate military involvement in civic endeavors and organizations. “I had only one requirement for who I wanted recruited into the program – leaders,” said U.S. Air Force Col. Michael ‘Goose’ Zuhlsdorf, 11th Wing and Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling commander. “Exactly like the squadron commanders that I have here on base, I wanted leaders that would make great teammates for us and we would make great teammates for them.” The first class included sixteen new honorary commanders and an emeritus commander who had been with the U.S. Air Force Band since the band’s time with 316th Wing at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland: -11th Wing Commander: Col. Michael Zuhlsdorf/Mayor Muriel Bowser, Mayor, Washington, D.C. -11th Wing Vice Commander: Col. Erica Rabe/Chairman Phil Mendelson, Chairman, DC Council -11th Wing Command Chief: Command Chief Master Sgt. Christy Peterson/Wanda Lockridge, Chief of Staff, Ward 8, Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • 19 May 1994 Greenbelt News Review
    What Goes On • • • • •• • Ancl More Sun., May 22, 1 p.m., GHIi An­ 6mnbdt and Budget Aooption, Muni­ ci,pal Bll'ilding. nual ·Meeting, Greenbelt Elementary School Wed. & Thurs., May 25 & 26, 10 a.m. - 7 p.m. Surplllls Mon., May 23, 7 a.m. - 8 p.m., Food Distribution, Municipal Voting contioo:ed for Gm Buildi111g Officers, Greenbelt Municipal Thurs., May 26, 7 :30 p.m., Build. lttws Btuitw Recycle Task Fo~ Meeting, Municipal Build~ng 8 p.m., .City Council Meeting AN INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPER Volume 57, Number 26 P.O. Box 68, Greenbelt, Maryland 20768-0068 Thursday, May 19, 1994 Greenbelt Youth Shot and Killed GHI Annual Meeting Sunday A 13-year-old Greenbelt Followed by Board Election youth was shot to death in Greenbelt East l'ate last Fri­ C.J. - A Life Remembered Greenbelt Homes, Ine. (GHI) members will choose four day afternoon (May 13) The day following C. J. Brown's murder, the site of members to serve two years on the board of directors from whMe anguished friends his death was turned into a makeshift shrine as friends, seven candidates at the annual meeting and election on May looked on h~plessly. Green­ family nem'bers, classmates, and strangers came and went 22/ 23. The annual meeting will begin as soon after 1 p.m. belt police a:pprehended nine as a quorum is established on Sunday, May 22 at the new to lay flowers there and to mourn in a kind of spontaneous Greenbelt Elementary School. male youths shortly thereaf­ wake. It continued sporadically through the next day.
    [Show full text]
  • Trip Schedule NOVEMBER 2013 – FEBRUARY 2014 the Club Is Dependent Upon the Voluntary Trail Policies and Etiquette Cooperation of Those Participating in Its Activities
    Mountain Club of Maryland Trip Schedule NOVEMBER 2013 – FEBRUARY 2014 The Club is dependent upon the voluntary Trail Policies and Etiquette cooperation of those participating in its activities. Observance of the following guidelines will enhance the enjoyment The Mountain Club of Maryland (MCM) is a non-profit organization, of everyone: founded in 1934, whose primary concern is to provide its members and • Register before the deadline. Early registration for overnight or com- guests the opportunity to enjoy nature through hiking and other activi- plicated trips is especially helpful. Leaders may close registration early ties, particularly in the mountainous areas accessible to Baltimore. when necessary to limit the size of the trip. The leader may also refuse We publish a hike and activities schedule, with varieties in location registration to persons who may not be sufficiently strong to stay with and difficulty. We welcome guests to participate in most of our activi- the group. ties. We include some specialized hikes, such as family or nature hikes. • Trips are seldom canceled, even for inclement weather. Check with We help each other, but ultimately everyone is responsible for their the leader when conditions are questionable. If you must cancel, call individual safety and welfare on MCM trips. the leader before he or she leaves for the starting point. Members and We generally charge a guest fee of $2 for non-members. This fee is guests who cancel after trip arrangements have been made are billed waived for members of other Appalachian Trail maintaining clubs. Club for any food or other expenses incurred. members, through their dues, pay the expenses associated with publish- • Arrive early.
    [Show full text]