Read Transcript
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Algirdas Matonis 772 Greenfield Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15217 [email protected] Mobile No: +1 412 961 2559
Algirdas Matonis 772 Greenfield Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15217 [email protected] Mobile No: +1 412 961 2559 Professional Experience 2015 – Present: River City Brass Band Principal Euphonium Player Key Responsibilities • Ensure a successful concert preparation for Euphonium and Baritone section • Playing solo performances with the band • Find substitute players in case of absence of assigned section member • Judge auditions for new players 2016 – Present River City Youth Brass Band Low Brass Instructor Key Responsibilities • Low brass sectional coaching • Full band coaching • Auditioning seat placements for low brass 2018 – Present Duquesne University Mary Pappert School of Music Adjunct Professor of Euphonium Key Responsibilities: • Teach one on one lessons to euphonium students or any other assigned brass students • Teach a studio class for low brass students • Prepare students for jury exams, auditions and end year recitals • Prepare students for ensemble assignments • Grade jury exams and recitals • Recruit new students • Judge euphonium applicant for school of music Education 2010 – 2014 Royal Northern College of Music in Manchester Bachelor in Euphonium Performance 2015 – 2017 Carnegie Mellon University Advanced Music Studies in Euphonium Performance, Orchestral Track Additional Qualifications 2006 “Trakai Fanfare Week”, Lithuania Masterclasses with Steven Mead, Fritz Damrow, Bert Langeler 2007 “Trakai Fanfare Week”, Lithuania Masterclasses with Steven Mead, Fritz Damrow, Bert Langeler, Marius Balcytis 2008 “Trakai Fanfare Week”, -
History of the Crusades. Episode 280. the Baltic Crusades. the Samogitian Crusade Part XIII
History of the Crusades. Episode 280. The Baltic Crusades. The Samogitian Crusade Part XIII. The Siege of Kaunas 1362. Hello again. Last week, we saw an effort by the Archbishop of Prague to convert the Lithuanian leaders to Christianity fail spectacularly, with the two pagan brothers making outrageous demands in return for their baptism, then laughing at and mocking the delegation when they objected. The upshot of this event was that converting the Lithuanians to Christianity by peaceful means was now permanently off the table as a goal to be pursued, so the only option left on the table was to convert the pagans by force. The Teutonic Order then spent time and effort constructing a bunch of new castles in Samogitia, which would provide a larger, more permanent Latin Christian presence in the region. Then, in the spring of the year 1362, fighting men from across Prussia, along with crusaders from Germany, Italy and England, gathered in Prussia, ready to head to Samogitia. This was to be a major Crusading expedition. William Urban describes it in his book "The Samogitian Crusade" as being a, and I quote, "huge force" end quote. Now you will notice that the Crusaders are departing in spring, not winter. That's because they don't need to ride across frozen rivers and swamps to get to Samogitia. Why don't they need to ride across frozen rivers and swamps to get to Samogitia? Well, because they are sailing there. Yes, in a novel break from tradition, the Grand Master and the Marshall of the Teutonic forces have come up with a plan to get everyone on board ships. -
The Grand Duchy of Lithuania in the Beginning of the 15Th
THE GRAND DUCHY OF LITHUANIA IN THE BEGINNING OF THE 15 TH CENTURY A er the death of Grand Duke Algirdas (1345–1377), his son Jogaila became the leader. In order to divert all a ention to the East, Jogaila signed a secret agreement with the Order, known as the Treaty of Dovydiškės, according to which the Order was free to a ack the lands belonging to Algirdas’ brother Kęstutis and his son, Vytautas. e Order informed Kęstutis of this agreement and in so doing initiated a civil war in Lithuania. At + rst, Kęstutis removed Jogaila from his seat of power, however, in 1382, Jogaila conquered Vilnius and imprisoned Kęstutis and Vytautas. Kęstutis was held prisoner in Krėva Castle, and was strangled by Jogaila’s servants. Vytautas managed to escape and sought protection with the Crusaders. Vytautas and Jogaila made peace in 1384, yet Jogaila once again failed to keep his promise to return Vytautas his fatherland, the Duchy of Trakai. In 1390–1392 Vytautas again appealed to the Order for assistance to go to war against Jogaila. Jogaila, who by now spent most of his time in Poland, could see that his appointed vicegerent, his brother Skirgaila, was unable to manage the internal opposition and so, once again made peace with Vytautas in 1392. at same year Vytautas became the actual leader of Lithuania, and o6 cially assumed this position in 1401. Wishing to reinforce Lithuania’s supremacy in the East – in the Ruzen and Tatars’ lands, Vytautas and the Order agreed on the Treaty of Salynas. According to this agreement, Vytautas relinquished Samogitia as far as Nevėžis and Kaunas as far as Rumšiškės to the Order. -
Dark Times: Art and Artists of Vilnius in 1939–1941
326 Dark Times: Art and Artists of Vilnius in 1939–1941 Giedrė Jankevičiūtė Vilnius Academy of Arts Maironio St. 6, LT-01124 Vilnius e-mail: [email protected] The aim of this paper is to discuss and reconstruct in general fe- atures the reality of the Vilnius artistic community from late autumn 1939 to June 1941. This period of less than two years significantly changed the configuration of the artistic community of the city, the system of institutions shaping the art scene as well as the artistic goals. It also brought forth new names and inspired new images. These changes were above all determined by political circumstances: the war that broke out in Poland on 1 September 1939; the ceding of Vilnius and the Vilnius region to Lithuania; two Soviet occupations: in the autumn of 1939 and June 1940, and the subsequent Nazi occupation a year later. The influence of politics on the art scene and the life of artists has been explored in institutional and other aspects by both Lithuanian and Polish art historians, but the big picture is not yet complete, and the general narrative is still under construction. A further aim of this paper is to highlight some elements that have not received sufficient atten- tion in historiography and that are necessary for the reconstruction of the whole. Some facts of cooperation or its absence among artists of various ethnicities are presented, and the question is raised on the extent to which these different groups were affected by Sovietisation, and what impact this fragmentation had on the city’s art scene. -
HARVARD UKRAINIAN STUDIES EDITORS George G
HARVARD UKRAINIAN STUDIES EDITORS George G. Grabowicz and Edward L. Keenan, Harvard University ASSOCIATE EDITORS Michael S. Flier, Lubomyr Hajda, and Roman Szporluk, Harvard University; Frank E. Sysyn, University of Alberta FOUNDING EDITORS Omeljan Pritsak and Ihor Sevienko, Harvard University MANAGING EDITOR Andrew Sorokowski BOOK REVIEW EDITOR Larry Wolff BUSINESS MANAGER Olga К. Mayo EDITORIAL BOARD Zvi Ankori, Tel Aviv University—John A. Armstrong, University of Wisconsin—Yaroslav Bilinsky, University of Delaware—Bohdan R. Bociurkiw, Carleton University, Ottawa—Axinia Djurova, University of Sofia—Olexa Horbatsch, University of Frankfurt—Halil inalcık, University of Chi- cago—Jaroslav D. Isajevych, Institute of Ukrainian Studies, Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, L'viv— Edward Kasinec, New York Public Library—Magdalena László-Kutiuk, University of Bucharest— Walter Leitsch, University of Vienna—L. R. Lewitter, Cambridge University—G. Luciani, University of Bordeaux—George S. N. Luckyj, University of Toronto—M. Łesiów, Marie Curie-Sklodowska University, Lublin—Paul R. Magocsi, University of Toronto—Dimitri Obolensky, Oxford Univer- sity—Riccardo Picchio, Yale University—Marc Raeff, Columbia University—Hans Rothe, University of Bonn—Bohdan Rubchak, University of Illinois at Chicago Circle—Władysław A. Serczyk, University of Warsaw at Białystok—George Y. Shevelov, Columbia University—Günther Stökl, University of Cologne—A. de Vincenz, University of Göttingen—Vaclav Żidlicky, Charles Univer- sity, Prague. COMMITTEE ON UKRAINIAN STUDIES, Harvard University Stanisław Barańczak George G. Grabowicz (Chairman) Timothy Colton Edward L. Keenan Michael S. Flier Roman Szporluk Subscription rates per volume (two double issues) are $28.00 U.S. in the United States and Canada, $32.00 in other countries. The price of one double issue is $18.00 ($20.00 overseas). -
The Lithuanian Nobility in the Late- Fourteenth and Fifteenth Centuries: Composition and Structure
LITHUANIAN HISTORICAL STUDIES 7 2002 ISSN 1392-2343 pp. 1–22 THE LITHUANIAN NOBILITY IN THE LATE- FOURTEENTH AND FIFTEENTH CENTURIES: COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE RIMVYDAS PETRAUSKAS ABSTRACT This paper presents a critical review of the historiographically dominant theory stating that the upper layer of the Lithuanian nobility formed its independent power only around the middle of the fifteenth century. The extant sources shed little light on the role of the nobility in the political processes of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. A complex of sources, more fully reflecting the specifics of the country, appeared only after the arrival of writing in Lithuania at the end of the fourteenth century. It was only in this period that the place of the nobles in the system of government became evident. Therefore, it is possible to speak about a distorted perspective, suggested by the early records. The paper presents a definition of the nobility and an analysis of the origin, composition and structure of the Lithuanian ruling élite in the late fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. Consequently it is possible to speak about the prerequisites of the rule of this social group and the duality of the power of the grand duke and the nobility. Two principal tendencies of the development of the Lithuanian nobility in the fifteenth century – personal continuity and internal transformation (family structure) – are distinguished. In Lithuanian historical models the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries have acquired the image of the epoch of ‘ducal Lithuania’. This was a period of the rule of the grand dukes Gediminas, Algirdas, Kęstutis, Jogaila and Vytautas. -
History of the Crusades. Episode 290. the Baltic Crusades. the Samogitian Crusade Part XXII
History of the Crusades. Episode 290. The Baltic Crusades. The Samogitian Crusade Part XXII. Grand Master Konrad von Wallenrode. Hello again. Last week we followed the Crusaders on campaign to Lithuania, where the Crusaders attacked the Lithuanian town of Vilnius with the ultimate aim of securing the town, defeating Jogaila and Skirgaila, and elevating their man Vytautas to the position of ruler of Lithuania. None of these events came to pass, but it did result in one crusader, Henry Bolingbroke, the future King of England, drinking a lot of beer with his men. We also saw last week the death of Grand Master Konrad Zollner von Rothenstein and his replacement by another Konrad: Konrad von Wallenrode. Now, William Urban points out in his book "The Samogitian Crusade" that, as the current Grand Commander of the Teutonic Order, Konrad von Wallenrode was the obvious standout candidate to be elected as the next Grand Master. The Wallenrode family had played prominent roles inside the Teutonic Order for some time, and Konrad von Wallenrode had enjoyed success as Grand Commander. Despite this though, there were apparently significant misgivings inside the Teutonic Order about the appointment of Konrad von Wallenrode are to the position of Grand Master. Why? Well, because Konrad von Wallenrode was a military man, through and through. In fact, to say that Konrad von Wallenrode had little or no interest in religion wasn't too much of an exaggeration, and William Urban reports that Konrad took so little notice of priests and God that he was once accused of heresy. The worst fears of the religious men of the Order seemed to have been realised when, after being elected as Grand Master, one of Konrad von Wallenrode first acts was to reform the command structure inside the Order to increase his authority. -
Kaplica Św. Anny Na Zamku Wysokim W Malborku : Zarys Dziejów Rekonstrukcji Na Przełomie XIX I XX W
Ryszard Rząd Kaplica św. Anny na Zamku Wysokim w Malborku : zarys dziejów rekonstrukcji na przełomie XIX i XX w. Ochrona Zabytków 47/2 (185), 185-196 1994 KOMUNIKATY, DYSKUSJE Ryszard Rząd KAPLICA SW. ANNY NA ZAMKU WYSOKIM W MALBORKU — ZARYS DZIEJÓW REKONSTRUKCJI NA PRZEŁOMIE XIX I XX W. Kaplica pw. św. Anny powstała w czasie wielkiej Zamkowym oraz Archiwum Państwowym w Elblągu rozbudowy Zamku Wysokiego w latach 1334-1344. z siedzibą w Malborku. Wśród nich znajduje się seria Od chwili wzniesienia traktowana była jako miejsce albumów fotograficznych, zwanych Mańenburg pochówków wielkich mistrzów Zakonu Niemieckie Baujahr z lat 1882-19204, kilka wydanych drukiem go. Od 1457 r. prawdopodobnie nie pełniła już fun sprawozdań rocznych, nieliczne inwentaryzacje (rzu kcji kultowych. W związku z tym popadała stopnio ty i przekroje) oraz kilka projektów do poszczegól wo w zapomnienie. Odbiło się to także na jej stanie, nych detali wyposażenia5. Niezbyt bogaty jest zestaw który pogarszał się z biegiem lat. Jej dzieje w tym literatury na ten temat. Stosunkowo dużo informacji okresie mogłyby być tematem osobnego opracowa znaleźć można jedynie w pracy B. Schmida Die Wie nia. Jednak w niniejszym szkicu pragnę jedynie zre derherstellung der Mańenburg wydanej w Królewcu lacjonować przebieg prac konserwatorskich z przeło w 1941 r. Pomocniczą rolę spełnia polska powojenna mu XIX i XX w. i opisać ówczesny wygląd obiektu dokumentacja opracowana na początku lat sześćdzie i jego bogaty wystrój, poważnie zniszczony w czasie siątych przez gdański oddział Pracowni Konserwacji II wojny światowej1. Zabytków6. W 1882 r. kierownikiem Zarządu Odbudowy Zam Poniższe rozdziały zawierają dane historyczne na ku w Malborku (Schlossbauverwaltung Mańenburg) temat najważniejszych elementów wystroju wnętrza został architekt Konrad Steinbrecht (1849-1923). -
Lietuvos Didžiosios Kunigaikštystės Monetos Coins of the Grand Duchy
Vincas RUZAS Lietuvosmonetos Didžiosios KunigaikštystėsLietuvos banko KATALOGASPinigų muziejuje / CATALOGUE Coins of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania at the Money Museum of the Bank of Lithuania Vilnius 2015 UDK 737(474.5)(091) Ru218 Fotografai / Photographers Rolandas Ginaitis, Eugenijus Ivanauskas Dizaineris / Designer Romanas Tumėnas Piešinių autorius / Author of the drawings Dainius Mikalauskas Redaktorė / Lithuanian text edited by Ramutė Macienė Į anglų kalbą vertė / Translated into English by Dalia Šatienė © Lietuvos bankas, 2015 © Vincas Ruzas, 2015 ISBN 978-9986-651-84-0 Turinys / Contents Įvadas / Introduction ......................................................................................................... 5 Lietuviški piniginiai lydiniai / Lithuanian currency bars .............................................................................. 55 Jogaila ................................................................................................................. 72 Vytautas .............................................................................................................. 94 LDK sritinės kunigaikštystės / Regional duchies of the GDL ...................................................................... 115 Kazimieras Jogailaitis / Casimir Jagiellon ...............................................................................................124 Aleksandras / Alexander ......................................................................................................... 146 Žygimantas Senasis / Sigismund -
ALGIRDAS (Olgierd), Grand Duke of Lithuania (1345-77), Son of \Gedin\Inas, Father of \]Ogaua and '[^Vitrigaila
PRIESTS. BISHOPS. 15 DUKES; ALGIRDAS (Olgierd), Grand Duke of Lithuania (1345-77), son of \Gedin\inas, father of \]ogaUa and '[^vitrigaila. He shared power with his brother Kfstutis: Vilnius and the eastern part of the country was Algirdas' domain, and Kfstutis reigned in Trakai, Samogitia and other western regions. Thus Algirdas was more concerned about relations with Russian duchies, while Kfstutis dealt with the Teutonic Order. Having lived an adventurous life, Kfstutis, a zealous supporter of pagan Lithuania, called "a heathen knight", enjoyed greater popularity than his brother. However, Algirdas was a more outstanding politician, thus in Algirdas' lifetime Kfstutis occupied only second place in the state. Q I: CtAlO It is known that in the year of Gediminas' death, Algirdas ruled Vitebsk and Krevo. His two wives - princess Maria of Vitebsk and prin• Grand Duke Algirdas of cess \luUanua of Tver - were Russian Orthodox. The majority of his Lilhuania. Artist J. Ozifblowski children adhered to the Russian Orthodox faith, but those who were born in Vilnius remained pagan, like their father. Algirdas annexed Kiev and many other Eastern Slavonic regions to Lithuania, waged war against the Grand Duke of Moscow Dmitry Donskoi and marched as far as the Kremlin. He founded an independ• ent Lithuanian Orthodox metropoly with the centre in Kiev. He defeated the Tartars at the Battle of Blue Waters (1363), participated in the strug• gle against the Teutonic knights with a demand to cede to Lithuania almost all of the ancient Prussian lands along with Konigsberg and a large part of Livonia. In Algirdas' times Lithuania became the largest and most likely strongest Central Eastern European power. -
Uniwersytet Warszawski Wydział Neofilologii Instytut Germanistyki
Uniwersytet Warszawski Wydział Neofilologii Instytut Germanistyki Adriana Pogoda-Kołodziejak Zakon Krzyżacki w literaturze polskiej i niemieckiej XIX i pierwszej połowy XX wieku Rozprawa doktorska napisana pod kierunkiem prof. dra hab. Lecha Kolago Warszawa 2011 Spis treści SPIS TREŚCI .................................................................................................................... 2 I. WSTĘP I METODOLOGIA BADAŃ....................................................................... 4 1. WPROWADZENIE ........................................................................................................ 4 2. POWIEŚĆ HISTORYCZNA, DRAMAT HISTORYCZNY, NOWELA HISTORYCZNA ................ 7 2.1. Próba zdefiniowania pojęcia ‘powieść historyczna’ ......................................... 7 2.1.1 Zarys genezy i rozwoju powieści historycznej ............................................... 12 2.1.2. Zarys rozwoju powieści historycznej w Polsce w XIX i w pierwszej połowie XX wieku. ................................................................................................................ 15 2.1.3. Zarys rozwoju powieści historycznej w Niemczech w XIX i w pierwszej połowie XX wieku .................................................................................................... 22 2.2. Próba zdefiniowania pojęcia ‘dramat historyczny’ ......................................... 30 2.2.1. Zarys genezy i rozwoju dramatu historycznego ............................................ 34 2.2.2. Zarys rozwoju dramatu historycznego w -
Download File
DER KONFLIKT ZWISCHEN DEN HERZÖGEN VON POMMERN- STETTIN… STUDIA MARITIMA, VOL. XXXII (2019) | ISSN 0137-3587 | DOI: 10.18276/SM.2019.32-06 Rafał Simiński Uniwersytet Szczeciński [email protected] ORCID: 0000-0002-3533-0566 DER KONFLIKT ZWISCHEN DEN HERZÖGEN VON POMMERN-STETTIN UND DEM DEUTSCHEN ORDEN IN PREUßEN UM DIE BESETZUNG DES ERZBISTUMS RIGA IN DEN JAHREN 1394–1403 IM LICHTE NEUESTER STUDIEN Schlüsselwörter: Herzöge von Pommern-Stettin, Erzbistum Riga, Deutschorden in Preußen, Livland, Deutsches Reich, Swantibor I., Otto II., Johannes von Sinten, Johannes von Wallenrode, Konrad Zöllner von Rotenstein, Konrad von Jungingen, Wenzel IV. Das Problem der Rivalität zwischen den Erzbischöfen von Riga und dem livländi- schen Zweig des Deutschen Ordens im Mittelalter ist in der Fachliteratur bereits sehr gut geforscht. Mit den Ursachen, dem Verlauf und den Folgen der Auseinanderset- zung zwischen dem livländischen Meister Wennemar von Brüggenei (1389–1401) und Erzbischof Johannes von Sinten (1374–1393), darunter mit den Bemühungen der Herzöge von Pommern-Stettin, die vakante Stelle des Rigaer Metropoliten durch sol- che Kandidaten wie Otto II., Sohn von Swantibor I. zu besetzen, haben sich Johannes Voigt,1 Friedrich Wilhelm Barthold,2 Antoni Prochaska,3 Paul Girgensohn,4 Hans 1 Johannes Voigt, Geschichte Preußens von den ältesten Zeiten bis zum Untergange der Herrschaft des Deutschen Ordens, Bd. VI: Die Zeit des Hochmeisters Konrad von Jungingen, von 1393 bis 1407. Verfassung des Ordens und des Landes (Königsberg: Bornträger, 1834), 41–52. 2 Friedrich Wilhelm Barthold, Geschichte von Rügen und Pommern, Bd. 3: Vom Tode Barnims I. (1278) bis zum Auftreten der Hohenzollern in der Mark Brandenburg (1411) (Hamburg: Perthes, 1842), 553–556.