Individual Station Report

New Canaan URBITRANR EPORT

CONTENTS: Stakeholder Interview Customer Opinion Survey Parking Inventory & Utilization Station Condition Inspection Lease Narrative and Synopsis Station Operations Review Station Financial Review

URBITRAN

Prepared to Connecticut Department of Transportation

S ubmitted by Urbitran Associates, Inc.

July 2003

June 2003 June 2003

June 2003 June 2003

June 2003

June 2003 Stakeholder Interview

URBITRANR EPORT

URBITRAN

Prepared to Connecticut Department of Transportation

S ubmitted by Urbitran Associates, Inc.

Only New Canaan was represented for the New Canaan branch, as Stamford did not participate.

New Canaan

According to the first selectman of the town, the agreement for Talmadge Hill and New Canaan stations are very straight-forward and work well. At , CDOT owns only the platform, while the rest of the station area, e.g. the surface parking, is owned and maintained by the town. is owned by CDOT, as are the immediate parking facilities. The feeling is that the station and parking areas at New Canaan station, recently reconstructed, are well maintained.

The town was concerned about liability issues and responsibilities for some activities and areas. As an example, the town evidently cleans the platforms while CDOT maintains them; sometimes the distinction between the two seems blurred. More importantly, the town feels that MNCR does not keep the track bed clean. With the new high platforms, more trash is collecting than in the past. There are also spikes, and ties left behind.

Taxi activity on-site is an issue to the town. While the town can control activity, they do not feel that it is working well. They would like some help from CDOT’s compliance division for complaints and inspections. There is a dispatcher on site and they are hoping to see some improvement in the near future. To control who can pick-up at the station, the town has instituted rules regarding vehicle color and identifying name, pictures of the driver in the vehicle, etc.

The town was complimentary of Carl Rosa and his responsiveness to their needs. The state spends most of its money on maintenance and operations, and will participate in some minor capital projects. The state recently paid for and constructed a new shelter at Talmadge Hill. The feeling is that it may be time to construct a new station at Talmadge Hill, with a full length platform and overhead protection. They cited West Redding and Wassaic as models.

They would like CDOT to stay in the loop regarding station operations, and would like the state to inspect the stations on a regular basis. Their basic position is that unless CDOT is unhappy, they are not, and they do not feel any change in procedures is needed. They like having local control over day-to-day activities and feel they can be more responsive to the local community.

They are concerned about parking issues if the state were to take over, specifically that lots now designated for New Canaan residents only would be open to everyone. Parking is the number one problem; by the 6:20 AM train all the meters are occupied, and the remaining parking is restricted to town permits. They give out about 2 permits per space. All spaces are generally filled by 8:30 AM. Talmadge Hill has 91 meters for general use, and the rest of the lots are permit controlled. The town is considering a plan to deck the “lumberyard” lot; one of the issues is that if CDOT helps in the financing of the deck, then the spaces would be open to non- residents. Local residents have fought any expansion at Talmadge Hill; better striping may provide an additional 70 spaces in the multi-tiered lots.

28 Customer Opinion Survey

URBITRANR EPORT

URBITRAN

Prepared to Connecticut Department of Transportation

S ubmitted by Urbitran Associates, Inc. Task 1.2:Technical Memorandum Customer Opinion Survey

New Canaan Line

New Canaan

The response rate of 34% at the New Canaan Station was excellent. Of all respondents, 92% rode the train daily and an additional 5% rode at least once per week. Commuters made up 93% of customers surveyed, and 96% of respondents traveled during the peak periods. Of the respondents that parked at the station, 69% had parking permits at the time of the survey, and of those without permits, 41% were on a waiting list.

Although the male to female ratio among surveyed customers has been high at most stations, the 86% male population is somewhat higher at New Canaan. The fact that 93% of responses were from customers aged 25-64 is not surprising given the typical profile of the work commuter. At New Canaan the remaining 7% were over 65 years of age. Finally, personal incomes were extremely high at this station; 94% reported salaries above $100,000, and the remaining 6% were above $75,000.

As New Canaan is a recently refurbished station, it follows that customer ratings for the various parking and station elements should be fairly positive. In fact, ratings for the different aspects of the station at New Canaan were among the most favorable in the entire survey. In fact, only 2 of the 39 elements included in the (ease of passenger drop-off and parking security) were rated ‘fair’ or ‘poor’ by more than 50% of survey respondents. Furthermore, the percentages of ‘excellent’ ratings were quite high, and every element was noted to have improved by at least half of respondents. New Canaan respondents rated the elements at the station the highest on the New Canaan Line for the station building, amenities and platform elements. New Canaan change ratings were the highest on the New Canaan Line for all 4 categories of elements.

The parking facilities at New Canaan did receive ‘fair’ or ‘poor’ ratings from at least a quarter of respondents for many of the different categories and the only 2 elements that were rated negatively by the majority of customers were included within the parking category. These were parking security (52% negative) and the ease of car or bus passenger drop-off (57% negative). Security remains a noteworthy complaint at many stations, although 71% of those who commented did indicate improvement at New Canaan. Parking maintenance, pathways to station, stairways and handicap accessibility were all rated with 80% approval or higher. Stairways were rated the highest of the parking elements with 92% satisfaction. Overpasses and underpasses do not exist at the New Canaan Station. Pathways to the station had the highest actual number of positive marks (80). Figure 249 shows how New Canaan respondents felt about the parking situation.

Connecticut Department of Transportation 225 Task 1.2:Technical Memorandum Customer Opinion Survey

Figure 249: New Canaan Station Parking Ratings

Parking Ratings

120

100

80 Poor Fair Good 60 Excellent Responses

40

20

0 Pathway(s) to Entrances Parking Lot Stairways Parking Exits Parking Parking Handicap Parking Parking Ease of Car or Underpass Overpass St at io n Pavement Maintenance Availability Sign age Accessibility Lighting Security Bus Passenger Condition Drop-Off Attribute

The station building received very favorable ratings; only the availability of seating prompted ‘fair’ or ‘poor’ ratings from more than a quarter of customers surveyed, and this too was seen to have improved recently. Ninety-eight percent of respondents were pleased with the overall condition of the station. Figure 250 describes the ratings of the station building in New Canaan. As was the case at most stations, absence of graffiti received the highest percentage of positive ratings (100% in this case). Eight of the 12 building elements received positive ratings exceeding 90%. The lowest rated element (seating availability) still received 63% favorable marks.

Figure 250: New Canaan Station Building Ratings

Station Building Ratings

120

Poor 100 Fair Good Excellent 80

60 Responses

40

20

0 Absence of Overall Building Cleanlines s Building Building Res trooms Availability of Handicap Building Ticket Booth Availability of Graffiti Condition Lighting Maintenance Climate Maps and Acces s ibility Security Hours Seating Control Schedules Attribute

Connecticut Department of Transportation 226 Task 1.2:Technical Memorandum Customer Opinion Survey

Amenities at the station were rated ‘good’ or ‘excellent’ by the majority of customers. Figure 251 displays the amenities ratings in New Canaan. The news/magazine stands were rated positively by 88% of respondents, making it the highest rated amenity. Bus drop-off/pick-up was rated positively by 61% of respondents, yet it was the lowest rated amenity.

Figure 251: New Canaan Station Amenities Ratings

Station Amenities Ratings

120

100

Poor Fair 80 Good Excellent

60 Responses

40

20

0 News /Magazine Stand A vailability of Tras h Cans Phones Taxi Stand Concession Stand Bus Drop-Off/Pick-Up Attribute

Figure 252 describes the platform situation in New Canaan. All of the platform elements were rated at 70% or higher satisfaction. In fact, all but 2 elements were rated above 90% positive. Ninety-nine percent of respondents (all but 1 person who rated it ‘fair) rated the overall condition of the platform favorably. Overall condition was the highest rated element. The working condition of the public address system was the lowest rated platform element with a full 73% approval.

Connecticut Department of Transportation 227 Task 1.2:Technical Memorandum Customer Opinion Survey

Figure 252: New Canaan Station Platform Ratings

Platform Ratings

120

Poor 100 Fair Good Excellent 80

60 Responses

40

20

0 Overall Condition Platform Maintenance Cleanliness Platform Lighting Shelters Handicap Acces s ibility W orking Condition of Public Address System Attribute

Customer appreciation of the rehabilitation of New Canaan station appears quite evident, both in the proportion of favorable ratings and the number of customers who indicated an improvement for the various elements rated in the survey.

Change

Change ratings in New Canaan were slightly higher than the ratings of the current condition, which can be expected from station that had recently been refurbished. The change ratings in New Canaan were the highest on the New Canaan Line for all 4 categories of elements.

New Canaan respondents felt that handicap accessibility had achieved 100% improvement during the previous 2 years. However, this element received the fewest actual number of responses in the parking category. Ease of passenger drop-off was the least improved parking element with 50% improvement ratings. Parking availability was the second least improved element but still received 63% improvement ratings. The stairways and pathways to the station were highly rated at over 90% improvement. Figure 253 shows how New Canaan respondents perceived change in parking conditions over the previous 2 years.

Connecticut Department of Transportation 228 Task 1.2:Technical Memorandum Customer Opinion Survey

Figure 253: New Canaan Station Change in Parking Conditions

Change in Parking Conditions

Overpass Underpass Handicap Access ibility Stairways Pathway(s) to Station Parking Lot Pavement Condition

Parking Maintenance Improved Parking Signage Worsened Attribute Parking Lighting Entrances Parking Security Exits Parking Availability Ease of Car or Bus Passenger Drop-Off

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% % Response

Figure 254 shows how New Canaan respondents felt about the changed condition of building elements. An incredible 7 elements including the overall condition of the building were thought to have improved by 100% of respondents. All of the other elements were thought to have improved by at least 85% of respondents. The refurbished station was obviously well received by the New Canaan customers.

Figure 254: New Canaan Station Change in Building Conditions

Change in Station Building Conditions

Absence of Graffiti

Building Maintenance

Cleanliness

Building Climate Control

Building Lighting

Handicap Acces sibility Improved Overall Condition Worsened Attribute Restrooms

Building Security

Ticket Booth Hours

Availability of Maps and Schedules

Availability of Seating

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% % Response

Figure 255 details the amenities trend ratings in New Canaan. The change ratings in New Canaan were between 65% and 88% improvement. Thus, the amenities were thought to have improved slightly less than the other categories of elements, but the change was still very positive. The least improved amenities were the phones and the most improved amenity was the news/magazine stand.

Connecticut Department of Transportation 229 Task 1.2:Technical Memorandum Customer Opinion Survey

Figure 255: New Canaan Station Change in Amenities Conditions

Change in Amenities Conditions

News/Magazine Stand

Availability of Trash Cans

Bus Drop-Off/Pick-Up Improved Worsened Amenity Concession Stand

Taxi Stand

Phones

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% % Response

New Canaan platform change ratings were the second highest of all the platform change ratings given at all the stations surveyed. Figure 256 shows the high platform improvement ratings. Platform handicap accessibility and lighting were thought to have improved by 100% of respondents. Shelters, a concern area in several stations, were thought to have improved by 93% of respondents. The least improved element, the working condition of the public address system, was still thought to have improved by 81% of respondents.

Figure 256: New Canaan Station Change in Platform Conditions

Change in Platform Conditions

Platform Lighting

Handicap Acces s ibility

Overall Condition

Improved Cleanliness Worsened Attribute

Shelters

Platform Maintenance

W orking Condition of Public Address System

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% % Response

As noted, the change ratings in New Canaan were extremely high, a testament to the excellent station conditions created after the refurbishing process.

Responsible Agencies

As was the case in several stations, New Canaan respondents generally thought that Metro-North was responsible for most station conditions. Figure 257 describes how New Canaan respondents viewed agency responsibility at the station. The largest exception to the Metro-North was with regard to parking, where 89% of respondents thought that the local municipality had responsibility. A majority of New Canaan respondents felt that Metro-North was responsible for the following 2 elements:

Connecticut Department of Transportation 230 Task 1.2:Technical Memorandum Customer Opinion Survey

• Platform (60%) • Map and Schedule Availability (88%)

Nearly half of respondents thought that Metro-North was responsible for these 2 elements:

• Station Building (47%) • Lighting (48%)

Additionally, 29% of respondents thought that Connecticut DOT was responsible for the station building and 27% thought that Connecticut DOT was responsible for lighting. Respondents were generally split between Metro-North (41%) and the local municipality (39%) when deciding who was responsible for security in New Canaan.

Figure 257: New Canaan Station – Responsible Agencies

Who is Responsible?

90 Connecticut DOT 80 Metro-North Railroad Local Municipality 70 Don't Know

60

50

Response 40

30

20

10

0 Parking Station Building Platform Lighting Security Availability of Maps and Schedules Attribute

Written-In Customer Comments

When asked to write in their own comments on the survey, New Canaan respondents were very concerned with need for more parking areas. Twenty-three people (37%) wrote in that more parking areas were necessary. When asked to rate parking availability in the rating section, 63% of respondents indicated satisfaction with the situation. The same percentage of respondents also thought that parking availability had improved in the previous 2 years. The next highest percentage (10%) of respondents wrote in overall good comments. Eight percent of respondents also thought that more trains were needed. Table 28 lists all of the comments made by respondents at the New Canaan Station, even the comments made by only 1 person.

Connecticut Department of Transportation 231 Task 1.2:Technical Memorandum Customer Opinion Survey

Table 28: New Canaan Station – Written-In Customer Comments

Comment # Comment % Code Responses 18 Need more parking areas 23 37.1% 49 Overall good comments 6 9.7% 65 More trains (cars) needed 5 8.1% 8 Entrances/Exits very difficult 3 4.8% 71 Better service 3 4.8% 85 Only residents should be allowed parking permits 3 4.8% 10 Lighting needs improvement 2 3.2% 3 Generally satisfied 1 1.6% 7 Long wait on parking list 1 1.6% 13 Need ticket machines 1 1.6% 16 Parking garage needed 1 1.6% 17 Longer station platforms 1 1.6% 22 Cleaner trains 1 1.6% 27 Trash cans needed 1 1.6% 37 Keep token & vending machines in good working order 1 1.6% 41 Information for parking permits made available 1 1.6% 47 Repaint the number of each parking space at New Canaan 1 1.6% 52 Need more free parking spaces 1 1.6% 58 Taxis all over parking lots and waited 15 years for a permit despite recent station rebuild 1 1.6% 59 Trains in terrible condition 1 1.6% 61 Better public address system needed 1 1.6% 66 Lot needs to be paved 1 1.6% 68 Cleaner restrooms on trains and in stations 1 1.6% 80 More seating outside 1 1.6% Total Comments 62 100.0%

Talmadge Hill

The survey distribution and response rate at Talmadge Hill, as well as the customer profiles, were quite similar to that of New Canaan. However, ratings for the various station elements were decidedly less favorable at Talmadge Hill. A total of 277 surveys were distributed with a response rate of 30%.

Ninety-four percent of respondents traveled daily and all traveled either for their commute to work or for other business purposes. Nearly all (99%) traveled during the peak periods. Among those who parked at the station, 61% held permits at the time of the survey, and 40% of those who did not were on a waiting list. Eighty-one percent of survey respondents were male, and 99% were between the ages of 25 and 64. Reported salaries were high once again; 86% of respondents indicated incomes over $100,000.

Overall, the ratings given to the parking, station and platform at Talmadge Hill were less favorable. In total, 12 of the 28 elements included in the survey relevant to this station were given ‘fair’ or ‘poor’ ratings by the majority of respondents.

Connecticut Department of Transportation 232 Parking Inventory and Utilization

URBITRANR EPORT

URBITRAN

Prepared to Connecticut Department of Transportation

S ubmitted by Urbitran Associates, Inc. Task 2:Technical Memorandum Parking Inventory and Utilization

New Canaan Line

New Canaan

The New Canaan Rail Station has 510 parking spaces in three surface lots in close proximity to the station proper. One lot is adjacent to the station, another is off Elm Street, and the third is off Pine Street. Three parking categories are utilized in these lots: permit parking, daily parking, and handicapped parking. There are 353 permit spaces, 151 daily spaces, and 6 handicapped spaces. The total usage for the lots was 82.4%, with daily and handicapped parking realizing 100% occupancy.

There are also a number of private municipal lots that provide an additional 585 parking spaces in the area around the station. There are six total lots, none of which provide handicapped parking. The lots offer a mix of permit and daily parking.

Parking Area Ownership

Lots 1 and 3 at the New Canaan Rail Station are owned by the State of Connecticut. All of the other lots are owned by the City of New Canaan. The State owns 15% of the parking used by rail commuters at the New Canaan Station. Figure 22 displays the locations and ownership of the parking lots.

Fee Structure

The New Canaan lots have permit and daily parking available. Daily parking costs $3. The permit rate is $324 annually, which is pro-rated throughout the year. The waiting list for permit parking ranges from 3 to 6 years, depending on which lot is being requested. The waiting list currently has 610 people waiting for permits. Permits are oversold at the New Canaan Station by 5.2%.

Table 22 contains specific information on the parking situation at the New Canaan Rail Station.

Connecticut Department of Transportation 54

Task 2:Technical Memorandum Parking Inventory and Utilization

Table 22: New Canaan Rail Station Parking Capacity and Utilization

Location Capacity Vehicle Count Utilization Ownership Lot 1 (Adjacent to Station) Permit 0 0 N/A Daily 87 87 100.0% state Handicap 6 6 100.0% Total Lot 1 93 93 100.0% Lot 2 (off Elm St.) Permit 346 256 74.0% Daily 0 0 N/A municipality Handicap 0 0 N/A Total Lot 2 346 256 74.0% Lot 3 (off Pine St.) Permit 7 7 100.0% Daily 64 64 100.0% state Handicap 0 0 N/A Total Lot 3 71 71 100.0% Lot 4 (Richmond Hill) Permit 68 52 76.5% Daily 0 0 N/A municipality Handicap 0 0 N/A Total Lot 4 68 52 76.5% Lot 5 (Maple St.) Permit 116 88 75.9% Daily 50 45 90.0% municipality Handicap 0 0 N/A Total Lot 5 166 133 80.1% Lot 6 (Seminary St.) Permit 0 0 N/A Daily 52 26 50.0% municipality Handicap 0 0 N/A Total Lot 6 52 26 50.0% Lot 7 (Seminary St.) Permit 118 90 76.3% Daily 10 4 40.0% municipality Handicap 0 0 N/A Total Lot 7 128 94 73.4% Lot 8 (Cherry St.) Permit 18 17 94.4% Daily 0 0 N/A municipality Handicap 0 0 N/A Total Lot 8 18 17 94.4% Lot 9 (Locust St.) Permit 125 109 87.2% Daily 28 16 57.1% municipality Handicap 0 0 N/A Total Lot 9 153 125 81.7% Permit 798 619 77.6% state Daily 291 242 83.2% 164 Handicap 6 6 100.0% municipality TOTAL PARKING 1095 867 79.2% 931

Connecticut Department of Transportation 55

Task 2:Technical Memorandum Parking Inventory and Utilization

Figure 22: New Canaan Rail Station Parking Map

Rail Governance Study Connecticut Department of Transportation

New Canaan Station Station Building

State-Owned Parking Area

Municipality-Owned Parking Area

Privately-Owned Parking Area Aerial Photo: Aero-Metric, Inc.

Connecticut Department of Transportation 56

Station Condition Inspection

URBITRANR EPORT

URBITRAN

Prepared to Connecticut Department of Transportation

S ubmitted by Urbitran Associates, Inc. CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Figure 1

CONDITION INSPECTION FOR THE NEW CANAAN STATION

GENERAL RECOMMENDATION 2

PREPARED BY: URBITRAN ASSOCIATES, INC. DATE: 9/11/02 CONN. DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION STATION INSPECTION

INSPECTION RATING SCALE

The following rating scale is used for inspections:

1- Totally deteriorated, or in failed condition.

2- Serious deterioration, or not functioning as originally designed.

3- Minor deterioration, but functioning as originally designed.

4- New condition. No deterioration.

5- Not applicable.

6- Condition and/or existence unknown. STATION: New Canaan CONN. DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION LINE: New Canaan STATION INSPECTION REPORT INSPECTION DATE: 12-16-01 SHEET 1 OF 61 INSPECTION AGENCY / FIRM: UA INSPECTORS: WV, RGW WEATHER: Sunny, 26°

PLATFORM ELEMENT CANOPY SUPER- FOUNDATIONS STRUCTURE SPAN NO. RAILING RAILING PAINT STAIRS JOINTS TOP OF PLATFORM BENCHES SIGN / BILLBOARD WARNNING STRIP PLATFORM EDGE RUBBING BOARD PEDESTRIAN TUNNEL COLUMNS OVERALL COLUMN BASE @ PLATFORM ROOF FRAMING ELEMENTS ROOFING MATERIAL DOUBLE TEE PIER FOOTING EROSION / SCOUR 123456789101112131415161718

I 33553533553333 5 5 3 3

II55533553553333 5 5 3 3

III55533553553333 5 5 3 3

IV55553553553333 5 5 3 3

V 55533553553333 5 5 3 3

VI55553533553333 5 5 3 3

VII55533553553333 5 5 3 3

VIII 55533553553333 5 5 3 3

IX55553553553333 5 5 3 3

X 55533553553333 5 5 3 3

XI55553533553333 5 5 3 3

XII55533553553333 5 5 3 3

XIII 55553533553333 5 5 3 3

XIV55553553553333 5 5 3 3

XV55553553553333 5 5 3 3

XVI55553553553333 5 5 3 3

XVII 55553553553333 5 5 3 3

XVIII 55533553553333 5 5 3 3 XIX55553553553333 5 5 3 3 STATION: New Canaan CONN. DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION LINE: New Canaan STATION INSPECTION REPORT INSPECTION DATE: 12-16-01 SHEET 2 OF 61 INSPECTION AGENCY / FIRM: UA INSPECTORS: WV, RGW WEATHER: Sunny, 26

PLATFORM ELEMENT CANOPY SUPER- FOUNDATIONS STRUCTURE SPAN NO. RAILING RAILING PAINT STAIRS JOINTS TOP OF PLATFORM BENCHES SIGN / BILLBOARD WARNNING STRIP PLATFORM EDGE RUBBING BOARD PEDESTRIAN TUNNEL COLUMNS OVERALL COLUMN BASE @ PLATFORM ROOF FRAMING ELEMENTS ROOFING MATERIAL DOUBLE TEE PIER FOOTING EROSION / SCOUR 123456789101112131415161718

XX55533553553333 5 5 3 3

XXI55533553553333 5 5 3 3

XXII 55533353553333 5 5 3 3

XXIII 33553553553333 5 5 3 3

XXIV 55533553553333 5 5 3 3

XXV55533553553333 5 5 3 3

XXVI 55553533553333 5 5 3 3

XXVII 55533553553333 5 5 3 3

XXVIII 55553553553333 5 5 3 3

XXIX 55533553553333 5 5 3 3

XXX55533553553333 5 5 3 3

XXXI 55553553553333 5 5 3 3

XXXII 55553533553333 5 5 3

XXXIII 33353553553333 5 5 3 3 STATION: New Canaan CONN. DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION LINE: New Canaan STATION INSPECTION REPORT INSPECTION DATE: 11-30-01 SHEET 3 OF 61 INSPECTION AGENCY / FIRM: UA INSPECTORS: JFS, RGW WEATHER: Foggy, 50's, rain/drizzle

BUILDING ELEMENTS

INTERIOR ELEMENTS

19. FLOOR: 4 20. CEILING: 4 21. WINDOWS: 4 22. DOORS: 4 23. FINISH: 4 24. HARDWARE: 4

EXTERIOR ELEMENTS

25. DOORS: 4 26. WINDOWS: 4 27. FACASE / FINISH: 4 28. FOUNDATION: 4 29. SETTLEMENT: 4 30. ROOF: 4 31. RAMP: 4 32. SIDEWALK: 4 33. HARDWARE: 4 34. CURB: 4

REMARKS:

1. Taxi stand refurbished 2 years ago 2. Talked with maintenance - No problems 3. Taxi stand - rating 4 4. On southern side of building stairs to the boiler room and crawl space - rating 4 STATION: New Canaan CONN. DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION LINE: New Canaan STATION INSPECTION REPORT INSPECTION DATE: 12-16-01 SHEET 4 OF 61 INSPECTION AGENCY / FIRM: UA INSPECTORS: WV, RGW WEATHER: Sunny, 26°

PARKING ELEMENTS

QUADRANT # I

TYPE OF SURFACE: asphalt x PAVED; GRAVEL; DIRT; OTHER (DESCRIBE)

CONDITION OF PAVED SURFACE: 3

CONDITION OF STRIPING: 4

CONDITION OF BASIN / DRAINS / ETC: 3 ( FOR LOCATION SEE SHEET: see sketch )

SIGNAGE: 3

FENCE AND GUARDRAIL: 5

LANDSCAPE: 4

SIDEWALK: 3

CURB: 3

QUADRANT # II

TYPE OF SURFACE: asphalt x PAVED; GRAVEL; DIRT; OTHER (DESCRIBE)

CONDITION OF PAVED SURFACE: 2

CONDITION OF STRIPING: 4

CONDITION OF BASIN / DRAINS / ETC: 3 ( FOR LOCATION SEE SHEET: see sketch )

SIGNAGE: 3

FENCE AND GUARDRAIL: 2

LANDSCAPE: 3

SIDEWALK: 5

CURB: 3 STATION: New Canaan CONN. DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION LINE: New Canaan STATION INSPECTION REPORT INSPECTION DATE: 12-16-01 SHEET 5 OF 61 INSPECTION AGENCY / FIRM: UA INSPECTORS: WV, RGW WEATHER: Sunny, 26

PARKING ELEMENTS

QUADRANT # III

TYPE OF SURFACE: asphalt x PAVED; GRAVEL; DIRT; OTHER (DESCRIBE)

CONDITION OF PAVED SURFACE: 2

CONDITION OF STRIPING: 4

CONDITION OF BASIN / DRAINS / ETC: 3 ( FOR LOCATION SEE SHEET: see sketch )

SIGNAGE: 5

FENCE AND GUARDRAIL: 2

LANDSCAPE: 5

SIDEWALK: 5

CURB: 2

QUADRANT # IV

TYPE OF SURFACE: asphalt x PAVED; GRAVEL; DIRT; OTHER (DESCRIBE)

CONDITION OF PAVED SURFACE: 2

CONDITION OF STRIPING: 4

CONDITION OF BASIN / DRAINS / ETC: 3 ( FOR LOCATION SEE SHEET: see sketch )

SIGNAGE: 5

FENCE AND GUARDRAIL: 2

LANDSCAPE: 3

SIDEWALK: 5

CURB: 3 STATION: New Canaan CONN. DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION LINE: New Canaan STATION INSPECTION REPORT INSPECTION DATE: 12-16-01 SHEET 6 OF 61 INSPECTION AGENCY / FIRM: UA INSPECTORS: WV, RGW WEATHER: Sunny, 26

PARKING ELEMENTS

QUADRANT # V

TYPE OF SURFACE: asphalt x PAVED; GRAVEL; DIRT; OTHER (DESCRIBE)

CONDITION OF PAVED SURFACE: 3

CONDITION OF STRIPING: 4

CONDITION OF BASIN / DRAINS / ETC: 3 ( FOR LOCATION SEE SHEET: see sketch )

SIGNAGE: 4

FENCE AND GUARDRAIL: 4

LANDSCAPE: 3

SIDEWALK: 3

CURB: 3

QUADRANT # VI

TYPE OF SURFACE: asphalt x PAVED; GRAVEL; DIRT; OTHER (DESCRIBE)

CONDITION OF PAVED SURFACE: 2

CONDITION OF STRIPING: 2

CONDITION OF BASIN / DRAINS / ETC: 5 ( FOR LOCATION SEE SHEET: )

SIGNAGE: 3

FENCE AND GUARDRAIL: 5

LANDSCAPE: 3

SIDEWALK: 5

CURB: 3 STATION: New Canaan CONN. DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION LINE: New Canaan STATION INSPECTION REPORT INSPECTION DATE: 12-16-01 SHEET 7 OF 61 INSPECTION AGENCY / FIRM: UA INSPECTORS: WV, RGW WEATHER: Sunny, 26

PARKING ELEMENTS

QUADRANT # VII

TYPE OF SURFACE: asphalt x PAVED; GRAVEL; DIRT; OTHER (DESCRIBE)

CONDITION OF PAVED SURFACE: 2

CONDITION OF STRIPING: 2

CONDITION OF BASIN / DRAINS / ETC: 3 ( FOR LOCATION SEE SHEET: see sketch )

SIGNAGE: 3

FENCE AND GUARDRAIL: 2

LANDSCAPE: 2

SIDEWALK: 5

CURB: 3

QUADRANT # VIII

TYPE OF SURFACE: asphalt x PAVED; GRAVEL; DIRT; OTHER (DESCRIBE)

CONDITION OF PAVED SURFACE: 2

CONDITION OF STRIPING: 2

CONDITION OF BASIN / DRAINS / ETC: 3 ( FOR LOCATION SEE SHEET: see sketch )

SIGNAGE: 2

FENCE AND GUARDRAIL: 2

LANDSCAPE: 2

SIDEWALK: 5

CURB: 3 STATION: New Canaan CONN. DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION LINE: New Canaan STATION INSPECTION REPORT INSPECTION DATE: 12-16-01 SHEET 8 OF 61 INSPECTION AGENCY / FIRM: UA INSPECTORS: WV, RGW WEATHER: Sunny, 26

PARKING ELEMENTS

QUADRANT # IX

TYPE OF SURFACE: asphalt x PAVED; GRAVEL; DIRT; OTHER (DESCRIBE)

CONDITION OF PAVED SURFACE: 2

CONDITION OF STRIPING: 2

CONDITION OF BASIN / DRAINS / ETC: 3 ( FOR LOCATION SEE SHEET: see sketch )

SIGNAGE: 3

FENCE AND GUARDRAIL: 2

LANDSCAPE: 2

SIDEWALK: 5

CURB: 3

QUADRANT # X

TYPE OF SURFACE: asphalt x PAVED; GRAVEL; DIRT; OTHER (DESCRIBE)

CONDITION OF PAVED SURFACE: 2

CONDITION OF STRIPING: 3

CONDITION OF BASIN / DRAINS / ETC: 3 ( FOR LOCATION SEE SHEET: see sketch )

SIGNAGE: 3

FENCE AND GUARDRAIL: 5

LANDSCAPE: 3

SIDEWALK: 5

CURB: 3 STATION: New Canaan CONN. DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION LINE: New Haven-New Canaan Branch STATION INSPECTION REPORT INSPECTION DATE : January 8, 2002 SHEET961 OF INSPECTION AGENCY / FIRM: Parsons Brinckerhoff INSPECTORS: Jim Connell & Dave Lang TIME OF INSPECTION: A.M. WEATHER: Clear & Cool

PLATFORM --- LIGHTING

Span Fixture Type Manufacturer Model Rating Support Estimated Visual Condition Number Number Condition Age/Life(y/y) all HID-MH unknown unknown 3 3 3/ 20 minor deterioration

Remarks: A typical section of the platform was measured at the location indicated and found to average 12.1 fc.

PLATFORM --- LIGHTING LEVELS (fc)

TRACKS----{

see remarks avg see remarks see remarks see remarks see remarks 12.1

NORTHBOUND/SOUTHBOUND PLATFORM

33

44 STATION: New Canaan CONN. DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION LINE: New Haven-New Canaan Branch STATION INSPECTION REPORT INSPECTION DATE : January 8, 2002 SHEET 10 OF 61 INSPECTION AGENCY / FIRM: Parsons Brinckerhoff INSPECTORS: Jim Connell & Dave Lang TIME OF INSPECTION: A.M. WEATHER: Clear & Cool

PLATFORM --- SERVICE

Voltage Rating (V) n/a Type of 3 phase connection Delta n/a Wye n/a Method of Entrance Overhead n/a Underground n/a Rating of Main Breaker (A) n/a Origin of Service Pole n/a Transformer n/a Code Compliant Yes n/a No n/a Quantity of Phases n/a Pole Number n/a Wire Sizes n/a & Street Remarks: Electric power for the platform is derived from the station building panelboards.

PLATFORM --- ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS

Electrical Device Manufacturer Model Rating Location Estimated Visual Condition Number Age/Life(y/y) Main Distribution n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Panel Main Disconnect n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Switch Transformer n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Receptacles unknown unknown 3 platform 3/ 20 minor deterioration

Grounding unknown unknown unknown unknown unknown unknown

Lighting Controls unknown unknown unknown unknown unknown unknown

Public unknown n/a n/a platform unknown operational Telephone Station n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Telephone

Remarks: STATION: New Canaan CONN. DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION STATION INSPECTION REPORT SHEET11 OF 61

INSPECTORS: Jim Connell & Dave Lang DATE: January 8, 2002

STATION PLATFORM --- ELECTRICAL AND LIGHTING SUMMARY

The power for the platform is in good working condition as described in the building summary. Metal Halide type luminaires are mounted beneath the canopy that covers the entire platform. Most of the luminaires are pedant mounted, except at the building where they are wall mounted. The light output of these luminaires averages 12.1 foot-candles and exceeds the minimal levels recommended by the IESNA. STATION: New Canaan CONN. DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION LINE: New Haven-New Canaan Branch STATION INSPECTION REPORT INSPECTION DATE : January 8, 2002 SHEET 12 OF 61 INSPECTION AGENCY / FIRM: Parsons Brinckerhoff INSPECTORS: Jim Connell & Dave Lang TIME OF INSPECTION: A.M. WEATHER: Clear & Cool

STATION BUILDING --- LIGHTING

Fixture Type Manufacturer Model Rating Support Estimated Visual Condition Number Condition Age/Life(y/y) incandescent unknown unknown 4 4 3/ 20 new condition pendant incandescent unknown unknown 4 4 3/ 20 new condition wall mtd 2 ft unknown unknown 4 4 3/ 20 new condition fluorescent 4 ft unknown unknown 4 4 3/ 20 new condition fluorescent

Exit unknown unknown 4 4 3/ 20 new condition

Emergency unknown unknown 4 4 3/ 20 new condition Egress Remarks: A typical section of the waiting room was measured and found to average 3.4 fc. The attic has several incandescent edison base light fixtures.

STATION BUILDING --- LIGHTING LEVELS (fc)

ROOM DESC: A B C D ROOM DESC: ABCD 11 waiting room not used 2 avg 2 3.4 33

44

ROOM DESC: A B C D ROOM DESC: ABCD 11 not used not used 22

33

44 STATION: New Canaan CONN. DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION LINE: New Haven-New Canaan Branch STATION INSPECTION REPORT INSPECTION DATE : January 8, 2002 SHEET 13 OF 61 INSPECTION AGENCY / FIRM: Parsons Brinckerhoff INSPECTORS: Jim Connell & Dave Lang TIME OF INSPECTION: A.M. WEATHER: Clear & Cool

STATION BUILDING --- SERVICE

Voltage Rating (V) 120/240 Type of 3 phase connection Delta n/a Wye n/a Method of Entrance Overhead n/a Underground X Rating of Main Breaker (A) 200 Origin of Service Pole X Transformer n/a Code CompliantYes X No n/a Quantity of Phases 1 Pole Number see remarks Wire Sizes unknown & Street Remarks: The underground electric service may originate at one of two utility poles. Therefore, we were unable to confirm the exact utility pole number.

STATION BUILDING --- ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS

Electrical Device Manufacturer Model Rating Location Estimated Visual Condition Number Age/Life(y/y) Main Distribution GE AF37S 4 electrical 3/ 20 new condition Panel room Main Disconnect Square D unknown 4 supply room 3/ 20 new condition Switch Transformer n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Receptacles unknown unknown 3 throughout 3/ 20 minor deterioration the facility Grounding unknown unknown unknown unknown unknown unknown

Lighting Controls unknown unknown 3 electrical 3/ 20 minor deterioration room Public unknown n/a n/a waiting area n/a operational Telephone Station unknown n/a n/a ticket boothn/a operational Telephone Main Metering GE TMPR12222R 4 attached to 3/ 20 new condition Cabinet exterior wall Light Panel GE AF37S 4 electrical 3/ 20 new condition room Lease Panel GE AF37S 4 electrical 3/ 20 new condition room Taxi Panel Square D QOC16UF 4 taxi stand 3/ 20 new condition

Remarks: STATION: New Canaan CONN. DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION LINE: New Haven-New Canaan Branch STATION INSPECTION REPORT INSPECTION DATE : January 8, 2002 SHEET 14 OF 61 INSPECTION AGENCY / FIRM: Parsons Brinckerhoff INSPECTORS: Jim Connell & Dave Lang TIME OF INSPECTION: A.M. WEATHER: Clear & Cool

STATION BUILDING --- FIRE ALARM SYSTEM

Fire Alarm Manufacturer Model Rating Quantity Location Estimated Visual Condition Device Number Age/Life(y/y) Fire Alarm Notifier System 500 4 1 waiting 3/ 20 new condition Control Panel room Heat Detector existence n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a unknown Smoke Detector unknown unknown 4 unknown throughout 3/ 20 new condition the facility Pull Station Notifier unknown 4 unknown throughout 3/ 20 new condition the facility Annunciator n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Audio/Visual unknown unknown 4 unknown throughout 3/ 20 new condition Device the facility Remarks: There are no pull stations at the coffee shop egress and there is no fire detection device located in the janitors closet. Smoke detectors are located in the taxi stand.

STATION BUILDING --- SKETCHES

Not Used STATION: New Canaan CONN. DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION STATION INSPECTION REPORT SHEET15 OF 61

INSPECTORS:Jim Connell & Dave Lang DATE: January 8, 2002

STATION BUILDING --- ELECTRICAL AND LIGHTING SUMMARY

The building and the small taxi stand structure have recently been renovated with new electrical systems throughout. The power panels are adequately serving the space and also have some spare capacity for growth. The building electrical system is in good repair and well maintained. The electrical service terminates in a metal enclosure within a wood cabinet located on the platform. Electrical power is then distributed to the platform and building. During hours of darkness, the waiting room maintains an average of 3.4 foot-candles. Luminaires should be added to increase the light level to 5 foot-candles to meet the minimum levels as recommended by the IESNA. Exit and egress lighting is operational and meets the requirements of NFPA 101. There is an active fire alarm system in the building that complies with the ADA. Fire detection devices are located throughout the building except there is no fire detection device located in the janitor’s closet. Additionally, there are no pull station devices located at the coffee shop egress. We recommend that devices be installed and connected to the existing fire alarm system at the coffee shop egresses and in the closet. STATION: New Canaan CONN. DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION LINE: New Haven - New Canaan Branch STATION INSPECTION REPORT INSPECTION DATE : January 8, 2002 SHEET 16 OF 61 INSPECTION AGENCY / FIRM: Parsons Brinckerhoff INSPECTORS: J. Duncan & T. Abrahamson TIME OF INSPECTION: A.M. WEATHER: Clear & Cool

BUILDING -- HVAC - Fire Protection

BOILER: N/A

Rheem/Rund 1 Element (lower) 6000 W, Serial CV 0998 KH 039830659 WATER HEATER: Model EGSP20, Good Repair

FUEL TYPE: Electric

Heating/Air Conditioning Unit Powermatic IWC, Serial 0698-15973 Model CA-Z, Input 250,000 Btu/hr HEATING UNIT / FURNACE: Output 200,000 Btu/hr - Excellent Condition

FUEL TYPE: No. 2 oil - Oil tank capacity approximately 500 gal. Installed July 1998

HEATING FILTER: Yes, Good Repair

A/C FILTER: Yes, Good Repair

Ductwork in crawling space under the floor - Excellent Condition Air supply through grilles (5) in the floor along the room perimeter, same in Ticket Area (2) grilles, from ticket area air return through grille above the door. DUCTS: Air return from the general area through ducted grille.

# OF DAMPERS: No dampers observed

CONDITION OF DAMPERS: N/A

THERMOSTATS: Honeywell, Programmable with night set back

NIGHT SET BACK: Yes

PUMPS: Not Observed

PIPING: N/A STATION: New Canaan CONN. DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION LINE: New Haven - New Canaan Branch STATION INSPECTION REPORT INSPECTION DATE : January 8, 2002 SHEET 17 OF 61 INSPECTION AGENCY / FIRM: Parsons Brinckerhoff INSPECTORS: J. Duncan & T. Abrahamson TIME OF INSPECTION: P.M. WEATHER: Clear & Cool

BUILDING -- HVAC - Fire Protection Continued

Air Cooled Condensers 2 Trane XE 1000 Model TTR048D100A Serial N491T6DFF Volts 208/230 Installed 11/98 - Good Repair

In the Attic

Two air return grilles. One ducted back to the unit, one not ducted but with damper for air relief in the spring and fall. - Good Repair

1 wall fan for exhaust air - Good Repair

Exhaust from toilets (2) and janitor's closet with exhaust fan; ducted to the outdoors. Good Repair

In Coffee Shop

One air supply grille in the floor, one air return in the ceiling, Good Repair

Fire Protection No sprinklers

Separate Small Building on Platform (Taxi Cab Dispatcher)

Through the wall A/C Carrier - Heat pump, Electric, Good Repair Additional Electric Portable Base Board Heater - Good Repair STATION: New Canaan CONN. DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION LINE: New Haven - New Canaan Branch STATION INSPECTION REPORT INSPECTION DATE : January 8, 2002 SHEET 18 OF 61 INSPECTION AGENCY / FIRM: Parsons Brinckerhoff INSPECTORS: J. Duncan & T. Abrahamson TIME OF INSPECTION: A.M. WEATHER: Clear & Cool

PLATFORM - PLUMBING

SPAN GUTTER DOWNSPOUT/ CLEAN-OUTS SPAN GUTTER DOWNSPOUT/ CLEAN-OUTS NO. PIPING NO. PIPING

All All gutters and downspouts in very good condition.

PLATFORM - FIXTURES -- N/A

SPAN #: SPAN #: SPAN #: MODEL: MODEL: MODEL: YEAR: YEAR: YEAR: MANUFACTURER:______MANUFACTURER:______MANUFACTURER:______CONDITION: CONDITION: CONDITION: STATION: New Canaan CONN. DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION LINE: New Haven - New Canaan Branch STATION INSPECTION REPORT INSPECTION DATE : January 8, 2002 SHEET 19 61 INSPECTION AGENCY / FIRM: Parsons Brinckerhoff INSPECTORS: J. Duncan & T. Abrahamson TIME OF INSPECTION: A.M. WEATHER: Clear & Cool

BUILDING - PLUMBING

RESTROOM Men's Fixtures

PIPING: Good Condition, Insulated (Handicapped) 1 Urinal WATER PRESSURE: Normal 1 Toilet DRAINS: OK 1 Lavatory FAUCET/FIXTURES: All Handicapped fixtures * MODEL: Unknown All water conservation fixtures * YEAR: Unknown All new and in very good condition * MANUFACTURER: Kohler Heat from under the floor through grille * CONDITION: Good Louvered door ADA Conditions - Yes all conform Exhaust fan working Water Conservation fixtures - Yes Floor drain KITCHEN Toilets have water flush system - PIPING: Sloan Flushrate, 1.6 gpf. WATER PRESSURE: DRAINS: Women's FAUCET/FIXTURES: N/A * MODEL: 1 Handicapped Toilet * YEAR: 1 Regular Toilet * MANUFACTURER: 1 Lavatory * CONDITION: All water conservation fixtures All new and in very good condition Heat through grille supplied from EXTERIOR under the floor

SPRINKLER: Louvered door FAUCET/FIXTURES: Exhaust Fan working * MODEL: N/A Floor drain * YEAR: * MANUFACTURER: Toilets have water flush system - * CONDITION: Sloan Flushrate, 1.6 gpf.

In common area, electric stainless steel refrigerated water cooler - Good Repair STATION: New Canaan CONN. DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION LINE: New Haven - New Canaan Branch STATION INSPECTION REPORT INSPECTION DATE : January 8, 2002 SHEET 20 OF 61 INSPECTION AGENCY / FIRM: Parsons Brinckerhoff INSPECTORS: J. Duncan & T. Abrahamson TIME OF INSPECTION: A.M. WEATHER: Clear & Cool

BUILDING - PLUMBING (CONT.)

RESTROOM

PIPING: WATER PRESSURE: N/A DRAINS: FAUCET/FIXTURES: * MODEL: * YEAR: * MANUFACTURER: * CONDITION:

KITCHEN

PIPING: Good Repair 2 stainless steel sinks - Good Repair WATER PRESSURE: Normal 1 normal sized sink DRAINS: OK 1 very small sink FAUCET/FIXTURES: As Described * MODEL: Unknown * YEAR: Unknown Janitors Closet * MANUFACTURER: Unknown * CONDITION: Good Repair One slop sink with hot and cold running water, no leaks, Good Repair

EXTERIOR

SPRINKLER: FAUCET/FIXTURES: * MODEL: N/A * YEAR: * MANUFACTURER: * CONDITION:

Building gutters and downspouts in very good condition. STATION: New Canaan CONN. DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION STATION INSPECTION REPORT SHEET 21 OF 61

INSPECTORS: J. Duncan, T. Abrahamson DATE: January 8, 2002

STATION – MECHANICAL SUMMARY HVAC The station HVAC system is fairly new and in very good condition. The HVAC unit uses No.2 oil for combustion, supplied from a fuel storage tank. The unit also supplies tempered (cool) air conditioning in the summer. Two air-cooled condensers are located outdoors.

Fire Protection The station is not equipped with sprinklers for fire protection but is equipped with heat detectors and an alarm system. Portable fire extinguishers shall be provided, conspicuously located and affixing “EXTINGUISHER” signs.

Plumbing System Men’s and Women’s restrooms are equipped with handicapped type fixture units. They conform to ADA requirements. Restrooms have been recently remodeled and are in very good condition.

Storm drainage All gutters and downspouts are in very good condition.

STATION: New Canaan CONN. DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION LINE: New Haven-New Canaan Branch STATION INSPECTION REPORT INSPECTION DATE: April 25, 2002 SHEET 22 of 61 INSPECTION AGENCY/FIRM: Warren & Panzer Engineers INSPECTORS: Hortense Oliveira/Josue Garcia WEATHER: Good

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INSPECTION

LEAD-BASED PAINT

Note: The LBP inspection was conducted using an RMD LPA-1 spectrum X-Ray Fluorescence Analyzer (XRF). The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) recommend XRF analysis for inspection of lead in paint. XRF readings were taken of surfaces coated with suspect LBP. The XRF was operated in “Quick Mode” for this project. In Quick Mode, the measurement time is determined by the LPA-1 Analyzer to achieve a 95% confidence measurement compared to an action level (1.0 mg/cm2). Platform

Lead # of Locations Presence Surfaces Tested Tested(>1 mg/cm2) Rating Canopy Columns 4Yes 3 Canopy Beams 4Yes 3 Canopy Deck 1No 3

Station Building

Lead # of Lead # of Locations Presence Locations Presence Surfaces Tested Tested(>1 mg/cm2) Rating Surfaces Tested Tested (>1 mg/cm2) Rating Ext Walls and Borders 5Yes 3 Window Sashes 3 No 3 Door Frames 3No 3 Window Sills 1 No 3 Doors 3No 3 Int. Walls 3 No 4 Window Frames 2No 3 Int. Ceiling and Canopy Assumed Yes 4

Lead-Based Paint was found on surfaces noted above. Painted surfaces were found to bein good condition. Any future disturbance of the lead-based painted surfaces noted above should be abated by an Environmental Protection Agency/Connecticut Abatement Contractor in accordance with the EPA’s 40 CFR 745, HUD’s 24 CFR Part 35 and The HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing, OSHA’s 29 CFR 1926.62, and all other applicable regulations.

SUSPECT ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS

Listed below are suspect asbestos-containing materials that were observed during a visual inspection. Materials were found to be in fair to good condition. Any future disturbance of these materials should be preceded by the collection of samples and laboratory analysis of these samples. This work must be performed by a certified inspector.

Platform

Suspect Materials Rating Caulking on Platform Seams 3 Station House

Suspect Materials Rating Window Glazing 3 Cab House Floor Tile 3 Roof Shingles 3

STATION: New Canaan CONN. DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION STATION INSPECTION REPORT SHEET 34 OF 61

INSPECTORS: WV, RGW DATE: 12/16/02

RATINGS PHOTO REMARKS: NEW PREV NO. 329Span III, XII, XXII,XXIX, XXX, XXXII 5 - Typical spalled and cracked concrete.

236Quad II, III, IV, VI-X Surface - Typical cracking, and uneven settlement

231Quad II, IIIFence - Typical bent and leaning fence

232Quad IIISurface -Typical sunken drain surrounded with cracks and uneven settlement

231Quad IIICurb - The timber curb is damaged

233Quad IVSurface -The asphalt pavement exhibits two potholes filled with dirt and rocks

234Quad IVSurface -Typical patched asphalt with ponding and surrounded with cracks

235Quad IVFence - Along the south side the fence is damaged and the retaining wall is collapsing into the parking area

236Quad VI, VII-IXLandscape - Broken branches and accumulation of leaves in the parking area

338Quad VII-IXCurb -The asphalt curbing is broken and missing in various locations

237Quad IXSignage - The sign is up heaved from the ground

239Quad VII-IXFence - The metal wire fence is leaning

219Quad VI Striping - The striping is faded. Sheet 61 of 61 New Canaan Station

Description Units Quantity Price / Unit Total Cost

Filling in cracked asphalt ft 477.00 $2.00 $954.00 Replace asphalt curb

-Removal of curb yd3 1.00 $80.00 $80.00

-Replacing curb ft 36.00 $22.00 $792.00 Replacing asphalt pavement

-Removal of asphalt yd3 5300.00 $22.00 $116,600.00

-6" top course and binder course yd2 14700.00 $25.00 $367,500.00

-7" aggregate base yd3 2780.00 $20.00 $55,600.00

Replace fence ft 455.00 $48.00 $21,840.00

Install fire alarm pull stations EACH 2.00 $138.00 $276.00 fixed heat detector EACH 1.00 $289.00 $289.00

Add luminaires in the waiting room * EACH 3.00 $500.00 $1,500.00

Estimated cost for portable extinguishers on brackets EACH 2.00 $300.00 $600.00

Miscelaneous (signs, timber curb, and etc.) LS - - $1,000.00

Mobilization / Demobilization (10%) $56,603.10

Sub-total $623,634.10

Contingency (20%) $124,726.82

Grand Total $748,360.92

Say $750,000.00

* The quantity of lobby luminaires required to bring lighting up to recommended levels is an order-of-magnitude estimate. Performance of a lighting design is required to develop a precise quantity estimate. Lease Narrative and Synopsis

URBITRANR EPORT

URBITRAN

Prepared to Connecticut Department of Transportation

S ubmitted by Urbitran Associates, Inc. Urbitran Associates

RAILROAD LEASE AGREEMENT NARRATIVE

STATION NAME: New Canaan and Talmadge Hill Stations STATION OWNER: State of Connecticut Department of Transportation (the “State”) LESSEE: Town of New Canaan

Under this Lease Agreement (the “Lease”), the State leases to the Town of New Canaan (the “Town”) five (5) parcels of land within the railroad right-of-way, containing an aggregate of 2.35 acres, more or less. These parcels comprise the New Canaan and Talmadge Hill Stations, both located in the Town of New Canaan. The term of the Lease is ten (10) years, commencing July 1, 1998, to and including June 30, 2008. The Town has the right to renew for one (1) additional ten (10) year period of time.

When the Lease requires work on, over or under the right of way of any railroad company, the Town must carry Railroad Protective Liability Insurance for and on behalf of the railroad company, the Town and the State as named insureds, with coverage limits of: (1) not less than $2,000,000 for any individual accident or occurrence involving injury or death and/or destruction of property; and (2) $6,000,000 aggregate for all injuries to persons or property during the policy period. These required amounts exceed the amounts called for in the “Standard Railroad Lease Specifications & Covenants”1 and the majority of other railroad lease agreements included in this study.

The Lease describes the duties of each of the parties with some specificity. The State retains the sole responsibility for maintaining all major structural renovations and/or repairs and for maintaining and restoring all fencing bordering the tracks, canopies over the platforms, and stairways. The Town is solely responsible for day-to-day maintenance, including, but not limited to, general structural repairs, snow removal, trash removal and security of any and all platforms, railings, stairs, shelters and ramps.

1 The Lease is made subject to the “Standard Railroad Lease Specifications & Covenants” dated June 18, 1998.

nar_newcanaan_talmadgehill 92654-00000 June 16, 2003 4:59 PM

LEASE SYNOPSIS

STATION NAME: New Canaan and Talmadge Hill Stations

Lease Document(s) Reviewed Lease Agreement dated 4/23/99

Station Owner State of Connecticut Department of Transportation (the “State”) Lessee Town of New Canaan

Agreement Number 2.11-03(99)

Effective Date of Lease 7/1/98

Term 10 years

Number of Renewal Periods 1 (at Lessee’s option)

Renewal Period 10 years

Number of Lessee Renewals Exercised 0 in Prior Years

Number of Renewals Remaining 1

Expiration Date of Lease 6/30/08

Recorded? Volume 515, Page 608

Number of Parcels 5

Total Acreage 2.35 acres

How Is Revenue Earned? Rail parking revenue and revenue from other rail- related leases Are Separate Funds Accounts Yes. Lessee shall establish a separate account to Required? accrue reinvestment funds. All revenue generated from all sources derived from the use of the property(ies) described in the Lease, minus mutually agreed to operating and/or maintenance expenses, shall be deposited into this fund. The State reserves the right to approve or disapprove the use of these funds to ensure improvement and maintenance of rail station building, parking, and services. Allowable Direct Costs in Calculating Maintenance of rail station buildings, rail station Surplus parking, and mutually agreed upon rail station operating and/or maintenance expenses syn_newcanaan_talmadgehill 92654-00000 June 16, 2003 5:01 PM

Allowable Indirect Costs in Calculating Not specified Surplus

Is Surplus Deposited in Capital Fund? Yes

Is Surplus Shared with the State? Yes

How Often is Surplus Shared? In the event there is a surplus, at the end of each five (5) year period of the initial term and the one (1) renewal period thereafter, if any, the State shall receive fifty percent (50%) of said surplus. Are Certified Financial Statements Yes. See Appendix I. Required?

Financial Statement Submission Period Lessee shall prepare and deliver to the State within ninety (90) days following the end of each year of the specified term of the Lease, statements of gross revenue. Is Annual Budget Required? No

Is Repayment of Debt Service No Required?

Monthly Debt Repayment Amount n/a

Does State Pay Lessee a Fee? No

Amount of Fee Due Lessee n/a

INSURANCE COVERAGE:

Property Damage Insurance When the Lease requires work on, over, or under the right-of-way of any railroad company, Lessee Bodily Injury Coverage shall carry, with respect to the operations that it or its subcontractors perform under the Lease, Railroad Protective Liability Insurance, providing for coverage limits of not less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) for all damages arising out of any one accident or occurrence, in connection with bodily injury or death and/or injury to or destruction of property [with limit of $6,000,000.00 for all injuries to persons or property during the policy period]. Other Required Coverage n/a

Voluntary Coverage n/a

syn_newcanaan_talmadgehill 92654-00000 June 16, 2003 5:01 PM -2-

Is Lessee Self Insured?

Is Certificate of Coverage on File?

Named Insured Lessee, State and Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company State Held Harmless? Yes

Lessee Waives Immunity Yes

MAINTENANCE:

Enhance Aesthetic Appearance Lessee

Not Erecting Signs on Premises Lessee

Surface Grade Land Lessee

Install and Maintain Fencing State

Install Suitable Drainage Lessee

Ice Snow Control of Sidewalks Lessee

Install and Maintain Electrical Systems Lessee for Lights

Sweeping and Cleaning Litter Lessee

Station Structures The State retains responsibility for maintaining all major structural renovations and/or repairs. Lessee shall retain sole responsibility of the day-to-day maintenance, including general structural repair. Platform Gutters Lessee

Fences State

Signs Lessee

Platform Lights Lessee

Drains Lessee

Equipment Lessee

Electric and Mechanical Systems Lessee

syn_newcanaan_talmadgehill 92654-00000 June 16, 2003 5:01 PM -3-

Live Rail Facilities State

Platforms Lessee

Railings Lessee

Stairs State

Platform Shelters Lessee

Platform Canopy State

Tunnels

Parking Lots Lessee

Waiting Room Lessee

Ticket Office Lessee

Baggage Room Lessee

PARKING:

Parking Fees Where there is a charge for parking, the minimum annual parking fee per vehicle is $100.00. The State reserves the right to review and approve any and all parking fees which exceed this minimum fee. Lessee has the right to establish and publish a Daily, Weekly, Monthly, Annual and/or other periodic Parking-Fee Schedule(s). Nondiscrimination Clause See Appendix II.

COSTS OF LEASEHOLD:

Water Lessee

Electricity Lessee

Other Public Utilities Lessee

Gas

Sewer

Owns Title to Property State

syn_newcanaan_talmadgehill 92654-00000 June 16, 2003 5:01 PM -4-

Owns Title to Capital Improvements State

Is Subleasing Allowed? Not without receipt of prior written approval from the State and the appropriate Federal Regulatory Agency, if required. Can Lease be Sold or Assigned? Not without receipt of prior written approval from the State and the appropriate Federal Regulatory Agency, if required. Is Security Bond Required? No

If so, the Amount n/a

OTHER:

Is there a Lease to CT Transit? No

Termination The State may terminate this Lease upon one year’s notice to the Town for reasons of default or if the property is needed for transportation related purposes. Employment/Non Discriminatory Yes Requirement

Miscellaneous Lease is made subject to the “Standard Railroad Lease Specifications & Covenants” dated June 18, 1998

syn_newcanaan_talmadgehill 92654-00000 June 16, 2003 5:01 PM -5-

Station Operations Review

URBITRANR EPORT

URBITRAN

Prepared to Connecticut Department of Transportation

S ubmitted by Chance Management

U nder Contract to Urbitran Associates, Inc.

NEW CANAAN BRANCH

The New Canaan Branch includes the following municipalities that participate in or manage the operations and maintenance stations and/or commuter parking lots: New Canaan (New Canaan and Talmadge Hill Stations) and Stamford (Glenbrook and Springdale Stations). Please note that the Stamford Transportation Center is operated by the State and was viewed separately from the Glenbrook and Springdale Stations. As such, the Stamford Station is noted in the New Haven Main Line separated from these smaller stations located on the New Canaan Branch.

NEW CANAAN New Canaan and Talmadge Hill Stations

The Town of New Canaan has two stations, one located in the center of town and one at Talmadge Hill just south of the Merritt Parkway. The recently renovated New Canaan train station, located in the center of the community, is heavily utilized and its parking lots are generally full by 7:00 a.m. A significant number of commuters also walk to the station from home or are dropped off at the station.

The New Canaan Station is considered to be a significant building to the town, even among those who do not commute to by train. The station was brought back to its original design and historic significance by the State’s Department of Transportation three years ago.

The station at Talmadge Hill is located a few minutes south of the New Canaan Station, and consists largely of parking lots, a small shelter and single platform.

Agreements

Although the Office of the First Selectman is familiar with the lease with the Department of Transportation, there is no organization chart of chain of command published for maintenance and operations responsibilities. The terms of the lease are generally followed in the operations and management of the leased lots. The Town is responsible for the day-to-day operations of the lots and station, and the State is responsible for major renovations and/or repairs. Further, the lease requires that the Town charge a minimum annual $100 parking fee per vehicle for state-owned parking lots.

The Town of New Canaan has tenants at the New Canaan Station, although the agreements are not formal and there are no written agreements available. However, municipal officials explained that the Town charges $400 a month for use of the taxi stand, and charges $100 a month to a coffee stand. The coffee stand pays its own utilities.

The Town leases land from a private developer, Avalon Bay Communities Inc., for additional commuter parking at the New Canaan Station. The lot is 3.5 acres and through a land swap arrangement, the Town pays the private entity $500 a day for an additional seventy spaces (120 permits).

The Talmadge Hill Station does not have tenants or any additional leases.

- 30 –

Organizational Structure

The New Canaan Station is centrally located in the Town of New Canaan. The town considers itself a “commuter village” where a significant portion of the residents use the Rail Line to commute to New York. It is a historically significant station and important to the community and functionality of the town. The station is monitored by the Department of Transportation, although the town plays a significant role in general maintenance of the platform and has sole responsibility for the commuter lots. The organization chart below illustrates the responsibilities and chain of command regarding the New Canaan Station and the Talmadge Hill Station.

New Canaan and Talmadge Hill Stations

Town of New Canaan Office of First Selectman Private Company Receives and Routes Complaints Civic Association Contracted for Housekeeping Landscaping and Cleaning Parking Commission

Department of Parking Department of Public Works Operations Police Department General and Preventative Maintenance, Parking Tickets, Meter Collections, Security Paving, Signs, Landscaping Permits and Fees, Maintenance of Maintenance Meters and Pay-by-Space Machines

City Functions

Other Organizations

As noted earlier, the Town of New Canaan does not have a published formal organization chart of responsibilities for the maintenance and operations of the New Canaan Station and commuter lots. The organization chart above was designed from information gathered from New Canaan municipal officials. The New Canaan Office of the First Selectman is the primary department for managing and operating the lots and serves as the main contact for the stations and associated lots of New Canaan Station and Talmadge Hill Station. Robert Bond is the First Selectman and official contact for issues regarding the stations, but is required to spend minimal time with these issues. Administrative officer of the Office of the First Selectman, Peter Murphy, is the administrative contact for the operations of the stations. He spends a larger percentage of his time (as do all departments involved) with the operations of the New Canaan Station than the Talmadge Hill operations.

The employees of the Department of Public Works report directly to the First Selectman. The Police Department does not formally report to the First Selectman. The Department of Parking Operations reports to the Parking Commission as well as the Office of the First Selectman. A private company is contracted for housekeeping and cleaning and reports to the Office of the First Selectman.

Operating Procedures

There are no operating procedure guides published by the Town; information was gathered from municipal officials as well. The New Canaan Station is well run, although there is no direct chain of responsibility and command. If there is a problem, a townsperson can file a complaint with the Office of the First Selectman. If it is a parking problem, the First Selectman will contact the Department of Parking Operations to solve the problem. The Department of Parking Operations is responsible for the

- 31 – maintenance of meters and pay-on-foot machines, parking permits, and parking enforcement. If it is a maintenance problem, the First Selectman will contact the Department of Public Works to fix the problem. Because New Canaan has a small municipal government system, this type of governance works well; particularly since the majority of town residents, not only public officials, would consider themselves stakeholders in the station.

NEW CANAAN Although a part of a small town, the New Canaan Station and lots are not a one-person operation. The employees of the Department of Public Works, who report to the First Selectman, perform general and preventative maintenance of the lot, paving, signs, and landscaping. The Police Department includes the lots of the stations as part of its patrol routes. All parking violations, meter collection, maintenance of pay- on-foot machines and meters, and permit and fee collections are performed by the Department of Parking Operations. A private company, Young’s, is contracted for housekeeping and cleaning, and a local civic association landscapes the area surrounding the station and its lots. There are no formal agreements available for the contracted housekeeping company or the non-profit organization.

Procedure Responsible Party Opening and Closing of Station MTA Housekeeping Inside Station Contracted Company Housekeeping Outside Station Department of Public Works Daily Maintenance Department of Public Works Preventative Maintenance Department of Public Works and Conn-DOT Landscaping Civic Association Security Police Department Customer Service Office of the First Selectman Tenant Performance Office of the First Selectman Parking Enforcement Department of Parking Operations Parking Fees and Permits Department of Parking Operations Parking Operation Maintenance Department of Parking Operations

TALMADGE HILL The Talmadge Hill Station is moderately maintained, and there is no direct chain of responsibility and command. Problem solving is done in the same manner as for the New Canaan station, but Talmadge Hill does not receive as much attention since it is not centrally located and is not as “noticeable.”

Procedure Responsible Party Opening and Closing of Station N/A Housekeeping Inside Station N/A Housekeeping Outside Station Department of Public Works Daily Maintenance Department of Public Works Preventative Maintenance Department of Public Works and Conn-DOT Landscaping Department of Public Works Security Police Department Customer Service Office of the First Selectman Tenant Performance N/A Parking Enforcement Department of Parking Operations Parking Fees and Permits Department of Parking Operations Parking Operation Maintenance Department of Parking Operations

- 32 –

Station Financial Review

URBITRANR EPORT

URBITRAN

Prepared to Connecticut Department of Transportation

S ubmitted by Seward and Monde U nder Contract to Urbitran Associates, Inc. NEW CANAAN FINANCES

ACCOUNTING ENTITY / BASIS

The Town accounts for the State-leased operations as an enterprise fund included in its annual general purpose municipal financial statements. The records are kept on an accrual basis similar to a private enterprise. The Town’s books are, for the most part, kept separate for the railroad State-leased property (New Cannaan station and parking, and the Talmadge Hill platform) from the Town-owned railroad parking areas (Talmadge Hill lot, Richmond Hill and the “lumberyard” lot). Revenues are separately identified for the State-leased lots from the Town-owned lots and certain expenses are also identified as specifically chargeable to the fund, but general municipal services get allocated to the railroad fund.

FINANCIAL REPORTING TO STATE

The presentation included in the annual municipal report is provided to the State. A separate detailed report is not submitted.

Financial measurements such as unit values for revenues or costs per space, etc. and units further broken down for each lot, is not required by the lease and not included with the financial information. Specific railroad lease operating or capital budgets are not necessarily a requirement of the lease or submission to the State.

REVENUES

Revenues are derived from parking, rents, and interest income. The State also provides capital grants outside of the enterprise fund. As previously mentioned, revenues are separately identifiable for State-leased lots from Town-owned lots

Parking revenues are from daily parking fees. Automated pay-station machines are located at the New Canaan parking lot. Parkers pay for their space by depositing money into the pay-station machine. The automated machine is administered to by the Town’s Parking Authority to collect the cash for deposit and identify any unpaid and occupied parking spaces. The Town-owned lots use permit and metered parking systems.

Rental income is derived from a taxi service, a newsstand, a coffee vendor and a vending machine.

Connecticut Department of Transportation 84 EXPENSES

The Town uses its municipal departments and outside services to maintain the railroad properties. Operating expenses include utilities, repairs, maintenance, cleaning and supplies. Repairs are generally performed by outside tradesmen and contractors. Cleaning and window washing is done under a service contract. Town services are provided by the Highway, Building and Park’s Departments. These services include plowing, sanding, sweeping, janitorial, landscaping and other similar services. Expenses exclude security costs because there is no security provided at the railroad lots by the local police as part of their scheduled patrol. The Town also charges depreciation on certain railroad properties.

Metro-North and ConnDOT – The State also incurs station expenses through its service agreement with Metro-North / Metropolitan Transit Authority. These expenses are accounted for by Metro-North and included in the charge to the State. The expenses generally relate to maintaining the platform at each station. At New Canaan the Town also relies on Metro-North to clean-up the debris in Jhe track area at the Station.

The finances of the local government however do not include the station expenses paid by the State to Metro-North under the separate service agreement. These expenses include various maintenance responsibilities related to the stations and especially the platform area. Metro-North performs cyclical maintenance and on-call repairs and maintenance as needed. Metro-North also is responsible to maintain any ticketing area on railroad property. Such costs have been identified and included in the financial presentation.

The Metro-North service agreement also provides that the State pay for the allocated cost of station maintenance forces. These allocated indirect costs have not been included in the financial presentation.

The local government is not in direct control of the services rendered by Metro-North. These services are controlled by the service agreement. The service agreement is outside of the State lease agreement with the local government

ConnDOT also incurs expense for its administrative oversight of the operating leases and the physical properties. These expenses were not compiled or presented in the financial presentation.

EXPENSE ALLOCATION

The allocation of indirect expenses is a financial issue that would apply to most of the State lease agreements where the local government has determined that administrative charges are warranted and come under the “mutually determined charges” clause of the lease agreements. The lease is not clear as to exactly what charges are allowable. The allocations generally result from common costs such as administrative expenses or departmental expenses that do not exclusively service the railroad properties but service a number of funds and functional activities. The reasonableness or propriety of the allocation and method was not evaluated to determine if such costs were actually

Connecticut Department of Transportation 85 incremental or simply attributed to the leased property under a full absorption costing methodology.

PROFITABILITY / ACCUMULATED SURPLUS

The railroad fund was operated at a profit for the 1996-1999 fiscal years. A loss of $23,184 was recorded in fiscal year 2000 (see Special Requirements note). At June 30,2000 the railroad fund had accumulated a net surplus of approximately $141,749.

The State expenditures for this property through its service agreement with Metro-North, when added to the cost of operations results in an excess of expenses over revenues. The local government does not give consideration to the Metro-North costs in setting parking fees.

SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS – SURPLUS/RESERVE/DEFICIT

The lease agreement does not specifically address the administration or funding of any deficit resulting from the State properties managed by the local government.

CAPITAL PROJECTS

In 1998 the original passenger station was renovated by ConnDOT preserving its historic features and making it more handicap accessible.

FINANCIAL PRESENTATION IN COMPARISON TO THE PARKING INVENTORY

A parking inventory and utilization report is presented separately as Task 2 in this study. The financial presentation herein covers only the State-owned 182 spaces at the New Canaan and Talmadge Hill stations as these are the only spaces for which financial information is captured in the railroad enterprise fund of the Town. The parking inventory includes an additional 1,224 rail parking spaces owned by the Town of New Canaan at the two stations.

Connecticut Department of Transportation 86

NEW CANAAN & TALMADGE HILL RAILROAD STATION AND PARKING OPERATIONS

YEAR 1996 YEAR 1997 OPERATING AGREEMENTS OPERATING AGREEMENTS REVENUES LOCAL GOV'T METRO-NORTH TOTAL % LOCAL GOV'T METRO-NORTH TOTAL %

PARKING $ 65,991 $ - $ 65,991 88.7%$ 66,934 $ - $ 66,934 88.6% RENTS $ 4,605 $ - $ 4,605 6.2%$ 4,645 $ - $ 4,645 6.1% INVESTED FUNDS $ 3,820 $ - $ 3,820 5.1%$ 3,992 $ - $ 3,992 5.3% OTHER $ - $ - $ - 0.0%$ - $ - $ - 0.0%

$ 74,416 $ - $ 74,416 100.0%$ 75,571 $ - $ 75,571 100.0%

STATION, PLATFORMS AND PARKING EXPENSES

REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE $ 57,698 $ 22,795 $ 80,493 84.1%$ 46,240 $ 17,274 $ 63,514 73.2% UTILITIES $ 9,367 $ - $ 9,367 9.8%$ 18,149 $ - $ 18,149 20.9% RENT $ - $ - $ - 0.0%$ - $ - $ - 0.0% SECURITY $ - $ - $ - 0.0%$ - $ - $ - 0.0% INSURANCE AND CLAIMS $ - $ 700 $ 700 0.7%$ - $ - $ - 0.0% GENERALLY CLASSIFIED EXPENSES (INCLUDING UNSPECIFIED - DIRECT, -INDIRECT, - ADMINISTRATIVE , -AND GENERAL ALLOCATIONS ) $ 2,190 $ 2,943 $ 5,133 5.4%$ 2,693 $ 2,416 $ 5,109 5.9% CONNECTICUT SALES TAX $ - $ - $ - 0.0%$ - $ - $ - 0.0%

$ 69,255 $ 26,438 $ 95,693 100.0%$ 67,082 $ 19,690 $ 86,772 100.0%

NET PROFIT (LOSS) $ 5,161 $ (26,438) $ (21,277) $ 8,489 $ (19,690) $ (11,201)

LOCAL GOVERNMENT'S RAILROAD FUND

ACCUMULATED SURPLUS (DEFICIT) $ 109,165 $ 117,654 LESS - LOCAL GOVERNMENT'S SHARE

NET AVAILABLE RAILROAD FUND SURPLUS (DEFICIT) 109,165 117,654

STATE'S AVAILABLE SHARE @ 50% $ 54,583 $ 58,827

Connecticut Department of Transportation

NEW CANAAN & TALMADGE HILL RAILROAD STATION AND PARKING OPERATIONS

YEAR 1998 YEAR 1999 OPERATING AGREEMENTS OPERATING AGREEMENTS REVENUES LOCAL GOV'T METRO-NORTH TOTAL % LOCAL GOV'T METRO-NORTH TOTAL %

PARKING $ 72,233 $ - $ 72,233 88.2%$ 79,862 $ - $ 79,862 92.7% RENTS $ 3,640 $ - $ 3,640 4.4%$ - $ - $ - 0.0% INVESTED FUNDS $ 6,021 $ - $ 6,021 7.4%$ 6,259 $ - $ 6,259 7.3% OTHER $ - $ - $ - 0.0%$ - $ - $ - 0.0%

$ 81,894 $ - $ 81,894 100.0%$ 86,121 $ - $ 86,121 100.0%

STATION, PLATFORMS AND PARKING EXPENSES

REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE $ 32,658 $ 22,076 $ 54,734 52.0%$ 5,350 $ 33,661 $ 39,011 50.0% UTILITIES $ 15,546 $ - $ 15,546 14.8%$ 4,008 $ - $ 4,008 5.1% RENT $ - $ - $ - 0.0%$ - $ - $ - 0.0% SECURITY $ - $ - $ - 0.0%$ - $ - $ - 0.0% INSURANCE AND CLAIMS $ - $ - $ - 0.0%$ - $ 69 $ 69 0.1% GENERALLY CLASSIFIED EXPENSES (INCLUDING UNSPECIFIED - DIRECT, -INDIRECT, - ADMINISTRATIVE , -AND GENERAL ALLOCATIONS ) $ 31,122 $ 3,956 $ 35,078 33.3%$ 32,052 $ 2,852 $ 34,904 44.8% CONNECTICUT SALES TAX $ - $ - $ - 0.0%$ - $ - $ - 0.0%

$ 79,326 $ 26,032 $ 105,358 100.0%$ 41,410 $ 36,582 $ 77,992 100.0%

NET PROFIT (LOSS) $ 2,568 $ (26,032) $ (23,464) $ 44,711 $ (36,582) $ 8,129

LOCAL GOVERNMENT'S RAILROAD FUND

ACCUMULATED SURPLUS (DEFICIT) $ 120,222 $ 164,933 LESS - LOCAL GOVERNMENT'S SHARE

NET AVAILABLE RAILROAD FUND SURPLUS (DEFICIT) 120,222 164,933

STATE'S AVAILABLE SHARE @ 50% $ 60,111 $ 82,467

Connecticut Department of Transportation

NEW CANAAN & TALMADGE HILL RAILROAD STATION AND PARKING OPERATIONS

YEAR 2000 OPERATING AGREEMENTS REVENUES LOCAL GOV'T METRO-NORTH TOTAL %

PARKING $ 97,530 $ - $ 97,530 96.0% RENTS $ - $ - $ - 0.0% INVESTED FUNDS $ 4,080 $ - $ 4,080 4.0% OTHER $ - $ - $ - 0.0%

$ 101,610 $ - $ 101,610 100.0%

STATION, PLATFORMS AND PARKING EXPENSES

REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE $ 71,073 $ 26,273 $ 97,346 60.2% UTILITIES $ 16,462 $ - $ 16,462 10.2% RENT $ - $ - $ - 0.0% SECURITY $ - $ - $ - 0.0% INSURANCE AND CLAIMS $ - $ 8,117 $ 8,117 5.0% GENERALLY CLASSIFIED EXPENSES (INCLUDING UNSPECIFIED - DIRECT, -INDIRECT, - ADMINISTRATIVE , -AND GENERAL ALLOCATIONS ) $ 37,259 $ 2,461 $ 39,720 24.6% CONNECTICUT SALES TAX $ - $ - $ - 0.0%

$ 124,794 $ 36,850 $ 161,644 100.0%

NET PROFIT (LOSS) $ (23,184) $ (36,850) $ (60,034)

LOCAL GOVERNMENT'S RAILROAD FUND

ACCUMULATED SURPLUS (DEFICIT) $ 141,749 LESS - LOCAL GOVERNMENT'S SHARE

NET AVAILABLE RAILROAD FUND SURPLUS (DEFICIT) 141,749

STATE'S AVAILABLE SHARE @ 50% $ 70,875

Connecticut Department of Transportation Traffic and Transportation

Bridge and Civil Engineering

Architecture

Parking Services

Construction Inspection

Environmental Services

Transit Services

Structural Engineering URBITRANREPORT 71 West 23rd Street New York, New York 10010 212.366.6200 Fax 212.366.6214

12 West 27th Street, 12th FLoor New York, NY 10001 212.366.6200 Fax 646.424.0835

New Jersey 2 Ethel Road - Suite 205B Edison, New Jersey 08817 732.248.5422 Fax 732.248.5424

150 River Road, Building E Montville, NJ 07045 973.299.2910 Fax 973.299.0347

Connecticut 50 Union Avenue Union Station, Third Floor East New Haven, CT 06519 203.789.9977 Fax 203.789.8809

California 1440 Broadway, Suite 500 Oakland, CA 94612 510.839.0810 Fax 510.839.0854

Massachusetts 275 Southampton Road Holyoke, MA 01040 413.539.9005

Albany 6 Meadowlark Drive Cohoes, NY 12047 P.O.Box 524 518.235.8429