Lynn Margulis Doctora Honoris Causa LYNN MARGULIS
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Cephalobus Litoralis: Biology and Tolerance to Desiccation
Journal of Nematology 20(2):327-329. 1988. © The Society of Nematologists 1988. Cephalobus litorali . Biology and Tolerance to Desiccation M. SAEED, S. A. KHAN, V. A. SAEED, AND H. A. KHAN1 Abstract: Cephalobus litoralis (Akhtar, 1962) Andr~ssy, 1984 reproduced parthenogenetically and completed its life cycle in 72-90 hours. Each female deposited 200-300 eggs. The nematodes showed synchronized movements in the rhythms of the anterior parts of the body. The nematodes were coiled when dried in culture medium or in slowly evaporating water droplets on the tops of culture plates, but in pellets they assumed irregular postures. Nematodes in pellets stored at high humidity could be reactivated after storage for 28 days. Key words: behavior, Cephalobus litoralis, coiling, desiccation tolerance, life cycle, parthenogenesis, synchronized movement. Cephalobus litoralis (Akhtar) Andrfissy, by a modified Baermann funnel method. 1984 was described in 1962 by Akhtar (1) A single gravid female was placed in a cav- as Paracephalobus litoralis based on only two ity slide containing water. After oviposi- female specimens collected from soil tion, a single egg was transferred to a petri around the roots of sugarcane (Saccharum dish containing finely blended pea meal o~cinarum L.) in the agricultural farms of paste (PMP) and water. All experiments the Pakistan Council of Scientific and In- were conducted with nematodes from sin- dustrial Research (PCSIR), Lahore, Paki- gle egg progeny raised in this manner. stan. It had not been reported elsewhere For mass rearing, nematodes were cul- until the authors found it in Karachi. In tured in 14-cm-d petri dishes containing 1967 Andrfissy (3) transferred Eucephalo- pea meal paste. -
Modelling Panspermia in the TRAPPIST-1 System
October 13, 2017 Modelling panspermia in the TRAPPIST-1 system James A. Blake1,2*, David J. Armstrong1,2, Dimitri Veras1,2 Abstract The recent ground-breaking discovery of seven temperate planets within the TRAPPIST-1 system has been hailed as a milestone in the development of exoplanetary science. Centred on an ultra-cool dwarf star, the planets all orbit within a sixth of the distance from Mercury to the Sun. This remarkably compact nature makes the system an ideal testbed for the modelling of rapid lithopanspermia, the idea that micro-organisms can be distributed throughout the Universe via fragments of rock ejected during a meteoric impact event. We perform N-body simulations to investigate the timescale and success-rate of lithopanspermia within TRAPPIST-1. In each simulation, test particles are ejected from one of the three planets thought to lie within the so-called ‘habitable zone’ of the star into a range of allowed orbits, constrained by the ejection velocity and coplanarity of the case in question. The irradiance received by the test particles is tracked throughout the simulation, allowing the overall radiant exposure to be calculated for each one at the close of its journey. A simultaneous in-depth review of space microbiological literature has enabled inferences to be made regarding the potential survivability of lithopanspermia in compact exoplanetary systems. 1Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL 2Centre for Exoplanets and Habitability, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL *Corresponding author: [email protected] Contents Universe, and can propagate from one location to another. This interpretation owes itself predominantly to the works of William 1 Introduction1 Thompson (Lord Kelvin) and Hermann von Helmholtz in the 1.1 Mechanisms for panspermia...............2 latter half of the 19th Century. -
The Parasitic Host: Symbiosis Contra Neo-Darwinism
Pli 9 (2000), 119-38. The Parasitic Host: Symbiosis contra Neo-Darwinism MICHELLE SPEIDEL Introduction Darwinism, and its modern formulation, neo-Darwinism, have often been the target of philosophically motivated attacks which centre on what are often seen as the ideological underpinnings, assumptions or consequences that are believed to emanate from Darwinism’s Malthusian origins. More often than not, these attacks focus on the ‘improper’ extensions of Darwinism into the social realm, in the areas of social engineering, evolutionary psychology (or its much-derided former incarnation, sociobiology), biopolitics, and the like. Occasionally, some attacks on Darwinism and neo-Darwinism have a force that is more ‘scientific’ in nature, that is, the attacks on the ideology attempt to show the entailment of real consequences for the methodology and practice of biological science itself, and are serious challenges not just to the ideological aspects of Darwinism, but to the theory itself. The group of approaches to evolution that can be grouped under the heading of ‘symbiosis’ appear to be challenges of precisely this kind. Symbiosis, the phenomenon that describes the ‘coevolution’ of two distinct species into a partnership-oriented evolutionary relationship, does appear at first glance to be absent from most descriptions of neo- Darwinism as a scientific theory, since such descriptions invariably prescribe competition as the primary impetus for evolutionary change. As I hope to show, there is a real sense in which a theory which emphasises competition cannot explain cooperative behaviours, except by fairly circuitous reroutings of the operational terms of the theory. Furthermore, I will argue that the real strength of symbiosis as a challenge to neo- 120 Pli 9 (2000) Darwinism lies in the very notion of symbiosis itself, quite apart from the ‘cooperative’ nature of symbiotic associations. -
Pinpointing the Origin of Mitochondria Zhang Wang Hanchuan, Hubei
Pinpointing the origin of mitochondria Zhang Wang Hanchuan, Hubei, China B.S., Wuhan University, 2009 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Biology University of Virginia August, 2014 ii Abstract The explosive growth of genomic data presents both opportunities and challenges for the study of evolutionary biology, ecology and diversity. Genome-scale phylogenetic analysis (known as phylogenomics) has demonstrated its power in resolving the evolutionary tree of life and deciphering various fascinating questions regarding the origin and evolution of earth’s contemporary organisms. One of the most fundamental events in the earth’s history of life regards the origin of mitochondria. Overwhelming evidence supports the endosymbiotic theory that mitochondria originated once from a free-living α-proteobacterium that was engulfed by its host probably 2 billion years ago. However, its exact position in the tree of life remains highly debated. In particular, systematic errors including sparse taxonomic sampling, high evolutionary rate and sequence composition bias have long plagued the mitochondrial phylogenetics. This dissertation employs an integrated phylogenomic approach toward pinpointing the origin of mitochondria. By strategically sequencing 18 phylogenetically novel α-proteobacterial genomes, using a set of “well-behaved” phylogenetic markers with lower evolutionary rates and less composition bias, and applying more realistic phylogenetic models that better account for the systematic errors, the presented phylogenomic study for the first time placed the mitochondria unequivocally within the Rickettsiales order of α- proteobacteria, as a sister clade to the Rickettsiaceae and Anaplasmataceae families, all subtended by the Holosporaceae family. -
Endospore-Forming Filamentous Bacteria Symbiotic in Termites: Ultrastructure and Growth in Culture of a Rthromitus
Symbiosis, 8 (1990) 95-116 95 Balaban, Philadelphia/Rehovot Endospore-Forming Filamentous Bacteria Symbiotic in Termites: Ultrastructure and Growth in Culture of A rthromitus LYNN MARGULIS1·*, LORRAINE OLENDZENSKI1 and BJORN A. AFZELIUS2 1 Botany Department, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA 2 Department of Ultrastructure Research, University of Stockholm S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden Received November 30, 1989; Accepted March 6, 1990 Abstract Many morphologically distinguishable filamentous spore-forming bacteria symbiotic in the paunch (hypertrophied hindguts) of wood-eating insects have been seen since Arihromitus was first described and named as a plant by Leidy in 1850. Previous descriptions were inadequate for acceptance of the group in modern bacteriological literature. Twenty-two distinguishable arthromitids in nine different arthropod hosts are recorded on the basis of microscopic studies. Five are named, including two whose ultrastructure are detailed: Arihromitus chasei sp. nov. that lives in the damp wood-eating termite Zootermopsis angusticollis (from the west coast of North America) and Arthromitus reticulitermitidis sp. nov. from the subter• ranean west coast termite Reiiculitermes tibialis. A. pterotermitidis from the desert termite Pterotermitidis occidentis; A. zootermopsidis, also from Z. an• qusticollis: and A. cristatus (Leidy, 1881) from Reticulitermes ftavipes of east• ern North America are also named here. Characterized by trichomes that show a morphogenetic sequence from no spores through immature spores to mature spores with spore filaments, Arihromitus symbionts can be identified as mem• bers of the genus by light microscopy and habitat. Electron microscopy reveals their remarkable complexity. They attach by spore filaments to various objects including the host gut wall; their maturation extends distally toward the termite lumen. -
CPI Newsletter – June 2018
Mail Stop 2404 • College Station, TX 77843-2404 • (979) 862-9166 • [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CPI Newsletter – June 2018 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Included in this issue: ⎯ Update from the CPI Chair ⎯ Huffines Faculty Research Seed Grants – Deadline June 15, 2018 ⎯ Potential Opportunity for NSF and NIH Supplements to Existing Grants ⎯ Export Controls Designated Liaison Network ⎯ 3rd Annual Postdoctoral Research Symposium – September 19, 2018 ⎯ Sign Up for Notifications about Limited Submission Proposal Opportunities ⎯ Bulletin for Principal Investigators 2017-18 CPI roster: Chair — Penny Riggs , COALS ● Vice Chair — David Threadgill , Veterinary Medicine ● AgriLife Extension — Craig Carpenter, Gaylon Morgan ● AgriLife Research — Michael Brewer, Ambika Chandra, Fugen Dou, Lee Tarpley ● Architecture — Ergun Akleman ● Bush School — Kent Portney ● COALS — Fuller Bazer, Russell Cross, Martin Dickman, Micky Eubanks, Elizabeth Pierson, David Stelly ● Education – Oi-Man Kwok, Jeffrey Liew ● Engineering — Jorge Alvarado, Ulisses Braga-Neto, Zachary Grasley, Melissa Grunlan, Tony Hsieh Sheng-Jen, Daniel Jiménez, Jodie Lutkenhaus, Ramesh Talreja ● Geosciences — Alejandro Orsi, Pamela Plotkin, Brendan Roark ● IBT/PHARM/RCHI — Julian Hurdle ● Law – Susan Fortney ● Liberal Arts — Sandra Braman, Steve Maren, Harland Prechel ● Mays — Korok Ray ● Medicine —Vytas Bankaitis, Kayla Bayless ● Science — Darren DePoy, Michael Hall, -
The Natural Science Underlying Big History
Review Article [Accepted for publication: The Scientific World Journal, v2014, 41 pages, article ID 384912; printed in June 2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/384912] The Natural Science Underlying Big History Eric J. Chaisson Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 USA [email protected] Abstract Nature’s many varied complex systems—including galaxies, stars, planets, life, and society—are islands of order within the increasingly disordered Universe. All organized systems are subject to physical, biological or cultural evolution, which together comprise the grander interdisciplinary subject of cosmic evolution. A wealth of observational data supports the hypothesis that increasingly complex systems evolve unceasingly, uncaringly, and unpredictably from big bang to humankind. This is global history greatly extended, big history with a scientific basis, and natural history broadly portrayed across ~14 billion years of time. Human beings and our cultural inventions are not special, unique, or apart from Nature; rather, we are an integral part of a universal evolutionary process connecting all such complex systems throughout space and time. Such evolution writ large has significant potential to unify the natural sciences into a holistic understanding of who we are and whence we came. No new science (beyond frontier, non-equilibrium thermodynamics) is needed to describe cosmic evolution’s major milestones at a deep and empirical level. Quantitative models and experimental tests imply that a remarkable simplicity underlies the emergence and growth of complexity for a wide spectrum of known and diverse systems. Energy is a principal facilitator of the rising complexity of ordered systems within the expanding Universe; energy flows are as central to life and society as they are to stars and galaxies. -
The Macronuclear Genome of Stentor Coeruleus Reveals Tiny Introns in a Giant Cell
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Departmental Papers (Biology) Department of Biology 2-20-2017 The Macronuclear Genome of Stentor coeruleus Reveals Tiny Introns in a Giant Cell Mark M. Slabodnick University of California, San Francisco J. G. Ruby University of California, San Francisco Sarah B. Reiff University of California, San Francisco Estienne C. Swart University of Bern Sager J. Gosai University of Pennsylvania See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/biology_papers Recommended Citation Slabodnick, M. M., Ruby, J. G., Reiff, S. B., Swart, E. C., Gosai, S. J., Prabakaran, S., Witkowska, E., Larue, G. E., Gregory, B. D., Nowacki, M., Derisi, J., Roy, S. W., Marshall, W. F., & Sood, P. (2017). The Macronuclear Genome of Stentor coeruleus Reveals Tiny Introns in a Giant Cell. Current Biology, 27 (4), 569-575. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.12.057 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/biology_papers/49 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Macronuclear Genome of Stentor coeruleus Reveals Tiny Introns in a Giant Cell Abstract The giant, single-celled organism Stentor coeruleus has a long history as a model system for studying pattern formation and regeneration in single cells. Stentor [1, 2] is a heterotrichous ciliate distantly related to familiar ciliate models, such as Tetrahymena or Paramecium. The primary distinguishing feature of Stentor is its incredible size: a single cell is 1 mm long. Early developmental biologists, including T.H. Morgan [3], were attracted to the system because of its regenerative abilities—if large portions of a cell are surgically removed, the remnant reorganizes into a normal-looking but smaller cell with correct proportionality [2, 3]. -
Phylogenetic Classification of Life
Proc. Natl. Accad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 1071-1076, February 1996 Evolution Archaeal- eubacterial mergers in the origin of Eukarya: Phylogenetic classification of life (centriole-kinetosome DNA/Protoctista/kingdom classification/symbiogenesis/archaeprotist) LYNN MARGULIS Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003-5810 Conitribluted by Lynnl Marglulis, September 15, 1995 ABSTRACT A symbiosis-based phylogeny leads to a con- these features evolved in their ancestors by inferable steps (4, sistent, useful classification system for all life. "Kingdoms" 20). rRNA gene sequences (Trichomonas, Coronympha, Giar- and "Domains" are replaced by biological names for the most dia; ref. 11) confirm these as descendants of anaerobic eu- inclusive taxa: Prokarya (bacteria) and Eukarya (symbiosis- karyotes that evolved prior to the "crown group" (12)-e.g., derived nucleated organisms). The earliest Eukarya, anaero- animals, fungi, or plants. bic mastigotes, hypothetically originated from permanent If eukaryotes began as motility symbioses between Ar- whole-cell fusion between members of Archaea (e.g., Thermo- chaea-e.g., Thermoplasma acidophilum-like and Eubacteria plasma-like organisms) and of Eubacteria (e.g., Spirochaeta- (Spirochaeta-, Spirosymplokos-, or Diplocalyx-like microbes; like organisms). Molecular biology, life-history, and fossil ref. 4) where cell-genetic integration led to the nucleus- record evidence support the reunification of bacteria as cytoskeletal system that defines eukaryotes (21)-then an Prokarya while -
Karl Jordan: a Life in Systematics
AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF Kristin Renee Johnson for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History of SciencePresented on July 21, 2003. Title: Karl Jordan: A Life in Systematics Abstract approved: Paul Lawrence Farber Karl Jordan (1861-1959) was an extraordinarily productive entomologist who influenced the development of systematics, entomology, and naturalists' theoretical framework as well as their practice. He has been a figure in existing accounts of the naturalist tradition between 1890 and 1940 that have defended the relative contribution of naturalists to the modem evolutionary synthesis. These accounts, while useful, have primarily examined the natural history of the period in view of how it led to developments in the 193 Os and 40s, removing pre-Synthesis naturalists like Jordan from their research programs, institutional contexts, and disciplinary homes, for the sake of synthesis narratives. This dissertation redresses this picture by examining a naturalist, who, although often cited as important in the synthesis, is more accurately viewed as a man working on the problems of an earlier period. This study examines the specific problems that concerned Jordan, as well as the dynamic institutional, international, theoretical and methodological context of entomology and natural history during his lifetime. It focuses upon how the context in which natural history has been done changed greatly during Jordan's life time, and discusses the role of these changes in both placing naturalists on the defensive among an array of new disciplines and attitudes in science, and providing them with new tools and justifications for doing natural history. One of the primary intents of this study is to demonstrate the many different motives and conditions through which naturalists came to and worked in natural history. -
Copyright by Paul Harold Rubinson 2008
Copyright by Paul Harold Rubinson 2008 The Dissertation Committee for Paul Harold Rubinson certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Containing Science: The U.S. National Security State and Scientists’ Challenge to Nuclear Weapons during the Cold War Committee: —————————————————— Mark A. Lawrence, Supervisor —————————————————— Francis J. Gavin —————————————————— Bruce J. Hunt —————————————————— David M. Oshinsky —————————————————— Michael B. Stoff Containing Science: The U.S. National Security State and Scientists’ Challenge to Nuclear Weapons during the Cold War by Paul Harold Rubinson, B.A.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August 2008 Acknowledgements Thanks first and foremost to Mark Lawrence for his guidance, support, and enthusiasm throughout this project. It would be impossible to overstate how essential his insight and mentoring have been to this dissertation and my career in general. Just as important has been his camaraderie, which made the researching and writing of this dissertation infinitely more rewarding. Thanks as well to Bruce Hunt for his support. Especially helpful was his incisive feedback, which both encouraged me to think through my ideas more thoroughly, and reined me in when my writing overshot my argument. I offer my sincerest gratitude to the Smith Richardson Foundation and Yale University International Security Studies for the Predoctoral Fellowship that allowed me to do the bulk of the writing of this dissertation. Thanks also to the Brady-Johnson Program in Grand Strategy at Yale University, and John Gaddis and the incomparable Ann Carter-Drier at ISS. -
Program E-Conference Evolution, Original Sin and the Fall
Evolution, original sin and the Fall June 22-24 2020, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO Organizers: Johan De Smedt, Helen De Cruz (Saint Louis University) Scientific committee: Johan De Smedt, Helen De Cruz (Saint Louis University), Adam Green (Azusa Pacific University) This conference will be held online. To register, please email deeptimemorality at gmail dot com by June 20. June 22 (All times are CT (Central Time Zone)) 9:50 – 10:00 Johan De Smedt and Helen De Cruz (Saint Louis University) Introduction, with review of the logistics of the conference (e.g., how participants can ask questions) 10:00 – 10:25 David Brown (Queen's University Belfast) Evolution as ontology and original sin: Is there a need for salvation? 10:25 – 10:30 Short break 10:30 – 10:40 Q and A 10:40 – 10:50 Break 10:50 – 11:15 Paul Macdonald (United States Air Force Academy) In defense of Aquinas’s Adam: Original justice, the Fall, and evolution 11:15 – 11:20 Short break 11:20 – 11:30 Q and A 11:30 – 12:30 Lunch break 12:30 – 13:10 Plenary talk: Hans Madueme (Covenant College) Sin and Evolution: A theological assessment 13:10 – 13:15 Short break 13:15 – 13:30 Q and A 13:30 – 13:40 Break 13:40 – 14:05 Walter Scott Stepanenko (John Carroll University) Evolution, the Fall, and Christian environmentalism 14:05 – 14:10 Short break 14:10 – 14:20 Q and A 14:20 – 14:30 Break 14:30 – 14:55 Janelle Aijian (Biola University) Believing in an interventionist God 14:55 – 15:00 Short break 15:00 – 15:10 Q and A End of day 1 June 23 (All times are CT (Central Time Zone)) 10:00