Seismic Characterization of the Zechstein Carbonates in the Dutch Northern Offshore

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Seismic Characterization of the Zechstein Carbonates in the Dutch Northern Offshore Seismic characterization of the Zechstein carbonates in the Dutch northern offshore Sjoerd Tolsma1 (Author) Prof. Dr. Jan de Jager1 (First supervisor) Bastiaan jaarsma2 (Second Supervisor) 1 Utrecht University, Netherlands 2 EBN, Utrecht, Netherlands June, 2014 MSc. Thesis: Earth, Life and Climate SEISMIC CHARACTERIZATION OF THE ZECHSTEIN CARBONATES IN THE DUTCH NORTHERN OFFSHORE Sjoerd Tolsma, 2014 Contents 1.0 Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 5 3.0 Geological & Tectonic History of the Netherlands ................................................................... 7 3.1 Study area structural elements ............................................................................................. 19 4.0 Zechstein lithological description ............................................................................................ 22 4.1 Zechstein 1 cycle.................................................................................................................... 24 4.2 Zechstein 2 cycle.................................................................................................................... 26 4.3 Zechstein 3 cycle.................................................................................................................... 30 4.4 Zechstein 4 cycle.................................................................................................................... 33 4.5 Zechstein 5 cycle.................................................................................................................... 33 4.6 The Zechstein Upper Claystone Formation ........................................................................... 33 4.7 Zechstein build-up distribution ............................................................................................. 33 5.0 Proven Zechstein platform areas ............................................................................................ 34 6.0 Possibilities for Zechstein build-ups in the northern Dutch offshore .................................... 38 7.0 Methods ................................................................................................................................... 43 7.1 Seismic interpretation ........................................................................................................... 44 7.2 Synthetics .............................................................................................................................. 45 7.3 Time – depth conversion ....................................................................................................... 45 8.0 Results ...................................................................................................................................... 48 9.0 Zechstein seismic character in real data ................................................................................. 49 9.1 Petrophysical description ...................................................................................................... 49 9.2 Conclusions on the petrophysical description ...................................................................... 56 9.3 Zechstein well synthetics ....................................................................................................... 57 9.4 Discussion & Conclusions ...................................................................................................... 66 9.5 Zechstein seismic character on seismic ................................................................................. 71 9.6 Discussion & Conclusions ...................................................................................................... 73 9.7 Base Zechstein amplitude map ............................................................................................. 74 9.8 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................ 76 10.0 Seismic interpretation .............................................................................................................. 77 10.1 DEF survey ............................................................................................................................. 77 10.2 TerraCube .............................................................................................................................. 78 10.3 2D Lines ..................................................................................................................................... 80 2 SEISMIC CHARACTERIZATION OF THE ZECHSTEIN CARBONATES IN THE DUTCH NORTHERN OFFSHORE Sjoerd Tolsma, 2014 10.4 Velocity model results ........................................................................................................... 80 10.5 Zechstein thickness map ....................................................................................................... 81 10.6 Base Zechstein amplitude map ............................................................................................. 82 10.7 DEF survey ............................................................................................................................. 82 10.12 TerraCube ............................................................................................................................. 90 11.0 Discussion ................................................................................................................................ 102 11.1 Development of the E02-02 platform ................................................................................. 102 11.2 Zechstein structures – DEF area .......................................................................................... 104 11.6 Zechstein structures – TerraCube area ............................................................................... 112 12.0 Zechstein platform distribution map ................................................................................... 120 12.1 Influence of paleowind direction ........................................................................................ 122 13.0 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................. 123 14.0 References ............................................................................................................................... 124 15.0 Appendices .............................................................................................................................. 126 3 SEISMIC CHARACTERIZATION OF THE ZECHSTEIN CARBONATES IN THE DUTCH NORTHERN OFFSHORE Sjoerd Tolsma, 2014 1.0 Abstract The presence of Zechstein carbonate platform facies is often controlled by the pre-existing paleo- geography and commonly occur on uplifted fault blocks and along the margins of the Southern Permian Basin. Present day Zechstein distribution maps suggest that these platform facies are absent along the margins of the Elbow Spit High in the Dutch northern offshore, while based on the general geological setting their presence might be expected. Only several Dutch and UK wells have drilled the Zechstein or older formations in the study area. Well E02-02 and A16-01 have strong positive indicators for the presence of Zechstein platform facies, with good reservoir characteristics. Well E02-02 drilled a Zechstein platform structure, which was confirmed by a side-wall core sample. A16- 01 found stromatolites along the SW margin of the Elbow Spit High, indicating a shallow water environment. Therefore it cannot be ruled out that platform facies exists in a large area along the margins of the Elbow Spit High. This has been investigated with the use of seismic data. First, seismic and petrophysical data will be used to characterize the Zechstein on seismic. That will be used, together with Zechstein analogues from the North-East Netherlands, to identify potential Zechstein platform structures. Second, top and base Zechstein is mapped in great detail and in specific areas the top Zechstein-3 Anhydrite Member is mapped as well. The identified potential Zechstein platform structures are then compared and compared to the proven E02-02 platform. The results show that the Zechstein Group contains several characteristic seismic properties that can be used to identify potential Zechstein platform structure, since a low amplitude seems to correlate with Zechstein platform structures. This study illustrates that Zechstein platform facies exists along the western and eastern margins of the Elbow Spit High, away from the wells that encountered this facies. A modified Zechstein distribution map has been proposed showing the areas with Zechstein platform facies along the Elbow Spit High. This map is based on the identified Zechstein platform structures and well data in the study area. Also a new area with possible Zechstein platform facies is proposed, that roughly correlates with the Step High. Acknowledgements I would like to express my gratitude to Bastiaan Jaarsma (EBN), my supervisor, for his patient guidance, enthusiastic encouragement and useful critiques on this research. I would also like to thank prof. Dr. Jan de Jager (UU), my second supervisor, for his advise and useful comments on my work. Guido Hoetz (EBN),
Recommended publications
  • A Late Permian Ichthyofauna from the Zechstein Basin, Lithuania-Latvia Region
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/554998; this version posted February 20, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 A late Permian ichthyofauna from the Zechstein Basin, Lithuania-Latvia Region 2 3 Darja Dankina-Beyer1*, Andrej Spiridonov1,4, Ģirts Stinkulis2, Esther Manzanares3, 4 Sigitas Radzevičius1 5 6 1 Department of Geology and Mineralogy, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania 7 2 Chairman of Bedrock Geology, Faculty of Geography and Earth Sciences, University 8 of Latvia, Riga, Latvia 9 3 Department of Botany and Geology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain 10 4 Laboratory of Bedrock Geology, Nature Research Centre, Vilnius, Lithuania 11 12 *[email protected] (DD-B) 13 14 Abstract 15 The late Permian is a transformative time, which ended in one of the most 16 significant extinction events in Earth’s history. Fish assemblages are a major 17 component of marine foods webs. The macroevolution and biogeographic patterns of 18 late Permian fish are currently insufficiently known. In this contribution, the late Permian 19 fish fauna from Kūmas quarry (southern Latvia) is described for the first time. As a 20 result, the studied late Permian Latvian assemblage consisted of isolated 21 chondrichthyan teeth of Helodus sp., ?Acrodus sp., ?Omanoselache sp. and 22 euselachian type dermal denticles as well as many osteichthyan scales of the 23 Haplolepidae and Elonichthydae; numerous teeth of Palaeoniscus, rare teeth findings of 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/554998; this version posted February 20, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Review the Mineralogy of Suspended Matter, Fresh and Cenozoic Sediments in the fluvio-Deltaic Rhine–Meuse–Scheldt–Ems Area, the Netherlands: an Overview and Review
    Netherlands Journal of Geosciences — Geologie en Mijnbouw |95 – 1 | 23–107 | 2016 doi:10.1017/njg.2015.32 Review The mineralogy of suspended matter, fresh and Cenozoic sediments in the fluvio-deltaic Rhine–Meuse–Scheldt–Ems area, the Netherlands: An overview and review J. Griffioen1,∗,G.Klaver2 &W.E.Westerhoff3 1 TNO Geological Survey of the Netherlands, P.O. Box 80 015, 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands and Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80 115, 3508 TC Utrecht, the Netherlands 2 Formerly BRGM, Laboratories Division, 3 av. C. Guillemin, BP36009, 45060 Orleans, France; Le Studium, CNRS, Orleans, France; TNO Geological Survey of the Netherlands, P.O. Box 80 015, 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands 3 TNO Geological Survey of the Netherlands, P.O. Box 80 015, 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands ∗ Corresponding author. Email: jasper.griffi[email protected] Manuscript received: 18 March 2015, accepted: 13 October 2015 Abstract Minerals are the building blocks of clastic sediments and play an important role with respect to the physico-chemical properties of the sediment and the lithostratigraphy of sediments. This paper aims to provide an overview of the mineralogy (including solid organic matter) of sediments as well as suspended matter as found in the Netherlands (and some parts of Belgium). The work is based on a review of the scientific literature published over more than 100 years. Cenozoic sediments are addressed together with suspended matter and recent sediments of the surface water systems because they form a geoscientific continuum from material subject to transport via recently settled to aged material.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing a Geological Framework
    21/2/12 GeolFrameworkPaper_postreview_v2acceptchanges_editorcomments New insights from 3D geological models at analogue CO2 storage sites in Lincolnshire and eastern Scotland, UK. Alison Monaghan1*, Jonathan Ford2, Antoni Milodowski2, David McInroy1, Timothy Pharaoh2, Jeremy Rushton2, Mike Browne1, Anthony Cooper2, Andrew Hulbert2 and Bruce Napier2 1 British Geological Survey, Murchison House, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3LA, UK. 2 British Geological Survey, Kingsley Dunham Centre, Keyworth, Nottingham, NG12 5GG, UK. * Corresponding author (email [email protected] (Approx.15,600 words in total, 25 figures) SUMMARY: Subsurface 3D geological models of aquifer and seal rock systems from two contrasting analogue sites have been created as the first step in an investigation into methodologies for geological storage of carbon dioxide in saline aquifers. Development of the models illustrates the utility of an integrated approach using digital techniques and expert geological knowledge to further geological understanding. The models visualize a faulted, gently dipping Permo-Triassic succession in Lincolnshire and a complex faulted and folded Devono-Carboniferous succession in eastern Scotland. The Permo-Triassic is present in the Lincolnshire model to depths of -2 km OD, and includes the aquifers of the Sherwood Sandstone and Rotliegendes groups. Model-derived thickness maps test and refine Permian palaeogeography, such as the location of a carbonate reef and its associated seaward slope, and the identification of aeolian dunes. Analysis of borehole core samples established average 2D porosity values for the Rotliegendes (16%) and Sherwood Sandstone (20%) groups, and the Zechstein (5%) and Mercia Mudstone (<10%) groups, which are favourable for aquifer and seal units respectively. Core sample analysis has revealed a complex but well understood diagenetic history.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Belgian Clays for Manufacturing Compressed Earth Blocks Lavie A
    GEOLOGICA BELGICA (2019) 22/3-4: 139-148 Evaluation of Belgian clays for manufacturing compressed earth blocks Lavie A. MANGO-ITULAMYA1*, Frédéric COLLIN2, Pascal PILATE3, Fabienne COURTEJOIE4 & Nathalie FAGEL1. 1Argiles, Géochimie et Environnement sédimentaires, University of Liège, Quartier Agora, 14 allée du 6 août, 4000 Liège, Belgium. 2Géotechnique, University of Liège, Quartier Polytech, 4000 Liège, Belgium. 3Belgian Ceramic Research Centre, 4 Av. du Gouverneur E. Cornez, 7000 Mons, Belgium. 4Architecture, University of Liège, 41 Boulevard de la Constitution, 4020 Liège, Belgium. * corresponding author: [email protected]. ABSTRACT. This study aims to characterize Belgian clays in order to evaluate their use for manufacture of compressed earth blocks (CEB). Nineteen Belgian clay deposits were sampled in 56 sites and 135 samples were collected and analyzed. The analyses focus on the determination of particle size, plasticity, nature and mineralogy as the main characteristics for assessing the suitability of the raw clays to make CEB. These analyses allow for classifying the sampled clay deposits in three categories: clays that can be used unchanged to make CEB (2 clay deposits), clays that are suitable for the manufacture of CEB but require addition of sand and gravel particles (13 clay deposits) and clays that are suitable for the manufacture of CEB if they are mixed with other raw clays (4 clay deposits). In order to verify the use of these clays, five of them served as a model for making CEB. The strength of these bricks was evaluated by testing for compressive strength and abrasion resistance. The results of these tests confirm the suitability or not of the sampled clays for the manufacture of CEB.
    [Show full text]
  • Alisocysta Margarita Zone, 213-14, 220 Angulata Zone, 244
    Index Acadian Orogeny, 198 bed forms accommodation space migration, 44 and accumulation rates, 104 wave-modified, 52 condensed sections, 81 Beinn Iaruinn Quartzite, 262, 264 and cyclothems, 69 Belemnite Bed, 238, 244-5, 251 depositional response, 267 Belgium, 213 ooid shoals, 66 berthierine, 98-100 overprinting, 71 Binnein Quartzite, 266 and oxygen conditions, 82 biostratigraphic zones acritarchs, 206 Kimmeridge Clay, 87 Agat, 150, 159-61 Portlandian, 111 aggradation Turonian, 181, 183 Kimmeridge Clay, 83 biostratigraphical control, 2 Palaeocene, 223 biostratigraphical gaps, 111, 113 shelf margins, 37 bioturbation, 70, 91, 131 tidal flats, 71 Birnbeck Limestone Formation, 67, 69-70 albaniZone, 109, 115, 118, 123, 137 Bituminous Shales, 84, 238, 239 algaenans, 90 black shales, 77, 80, 82 Alisocysta margarita Zone, 213-14, 220 Black Ven Marls, 244, 248 allocycles, 72 Blea Wyke Sandstone Formation, 239, 248 Allt Goibhre Formation, 262, 264 Blue Lias, 82, 244-5,248 Alpine tectonics, 224 Blyth-Acklington dyke, 225 Alum Shales, 239 bone-beds, 98 Amazon Fan, 159 environments, 103 ammonites, 41-2, 48, 56, 109, 178 geochemistry, 101 biostratigraphy, 181, 231 bottom currents, 150, 159 amorphous organic matter, 77, 89-90 bottom water, volume, 82-3 Anglo-Paris Basin, 218 Boulonnais, 83, 85 anguiformis Zone, 131, 133, 139 brachiopods, 206 angulata Zone, 244 Branscombe Hardground, 193 anoxia, 81-2, 218 Breathitt Group, 36 and uranium, 235 British Tertiary Igneous Province, 224-6 apatite, 100-1,103 Bronnant Fault, 205 Apectodinium hyperacanthum Zone,
    [Show full text]
  • Early Geothermal Exploration in the Netherlands 1980 - 2000
    European Geothermal Congress 2019 Den Haag, The Netherlands, 11-14 June 2019 Early Geothermal Exploration in the Netherlands 1980 - 2000 F. Charles Dufour1, Jan Piet Heederik1 1 Former Groundwater Survey TNO - TNO Institute of Applied Geoscience [email protected] (main author) [email protected] (contact person) 1. INTRODUCTION Figure 2: Development of consumer price of gas in €ct per m3 in the Netherlands (1980 - 2010) From the point of view of introduction of geothermal energy in the Netherlands, the period, presented in this paper, was characterised by the following influential aspects. – Geothermal energy had to be an economic attractive alternative for the existing energy sources. Environmental aspects became an aspect of influence only after 1993. – Very restricted knowledge of reservoir characteristics of those formations with a potential for exploitation of geothermal energy was available. – Lack of any cooperation or support by the operating oil companies to submit the necessary more detailed Source: Several. Based on CBS information regarding reservoir characteristics in the period under consideration. Figure 3: Greenhouse gas price in €ct per m3 in the – Lack of any cooperation or support by the existing Netherlands (1975 - 1989) energy supply companies to give room to a demonstration project or to an introduction in housing areas under construction in the period under consideration. It was only in cooperation with ‘Nutsbedrijf Westland N.V.’ NBW that an energy supply company fully cooperated in the preparation of a geothermal project (1992). – Restraint with respect to the possibilities to exploit sandstone reservoirs for geothermal energy, based on experiences in France, where production occurred from carbonate reservoirs and tests of siliciclastic reservoirs had failed.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrocarbon Plays from West Poland: Zechstein Limestone and Main Dolomite
    Hydrocarbon Plays from West Poland: Zechstein Limestone and Main Dolomite Paweł Zdanowski & Tomasz Solarski PGNiG SA (Polish Oli & Gas Company), Exploration and Production Branch Underexplored Plays - Part III 31-X-2018 & 01-XI-2018 Stavanger Hydrocarbon Plays from West Poland: Zechstein Limestone (Ca1) and Main Dolomite (Ca2) Presentation outline: Palaeogeography of Zechstein • Southern Permian Basin and Northern Permian Basin • Correlation of carbonate units between SBP and NPB Zechstein Limestone (Brońsko Gas Field) • Hydrocarbon Play. • Pattern Recognition from Seismic. Main Dolomite (BMB and LMG oil & gas fields) • Hydrocarbon Play. • Pattern Recognition from Seismic. • Analysis of Seismic Attributes. • Seismic Modeling. Late Permian Paleogeography from Blakely (2014) Tucker, 2016 After Scotese, 2002 European Southern Permian Basin Zechstein Sea Connected to Pantalassa Ocean 2000km to N/NE. Possible connection to Paleo-Tethys through the Polish Sub-Basin to the SE ?? Palaeo-latitude: 10-20°. Climate extremely arid. After Scotese, 2012 Sketch map of Permian sedimentary basin in north-west Europe Dziękuję za uwagę Stavanger Warsaw Millennium Atlas: Petroleum Geology of the Central and Northern North Sea, 2003 Polish Zechstein Basin ….stratigraphy Leine Na2 A2 Stassfurt Ca2 A1g Na1 A1d Werra Ca1 Wagner & Peryt. 1997 Słowakiewicz & Mikołajewski, 2009 Tucker, 2016 Comparison of the Zechstein development of the NPB with the classic SPB Evans et al. 2003 Madeleine et al. 2018 Zechstein Limestone – Ca1 (≈ Argyll Carbonate Member) Zechstein basin, showing the position of the Brandenburg-Wolsztyn-Pogorzela palaeo-High Basin facies of the Zechstein Limestone in Poland, showing the occurrence of isolated reefs related to the Brandenburg-Wolsztyn-Pogorzela palaeo-High. isolated reefs (rimmed platform) Peryt et al.
    [Show full text]
  • 3D Seismic Reflection Data Reveal Syn-Depositional Halokinesis in The
    This manuscript is a EarthArxiv preprint and had been submitted for publication in the AAPG Bulletin. Please note that this manuscript has not been peer-reviewed. Subsequent versions of this manuscript may, thus, have slightly different content. If accepted, the final version of this manuscript will be available via the “Peer-reviewed Publication DOI” link on the right- hand side of this webpage. Please feel free to contact any of the authors directly; We welcome your feedback. 1 3D seismic reflection data reveal syn-depositional halokinesis in the 2 Zechstein Supergroup (Lopingian), Central North Sea, UK 3 Amir Joffe 1*, Christopher A-L. Jackson2, Leonardo M. Pichel3 4 1. Basins Research Group (BRG), Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial 5 College London, South Kensington Campus, SW7 2BP, UK 6 2. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Manchester, 7 Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK 8 3. Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen, Allégaten 41, 5007, Bergen, 9 Norway 10 Abstract 11 Salt tectonics is typically caused by the flow of mobile evaporites in response to post- 12 depositional gravity gliding and/or differential loading by overburden sediments. This situation 13 is considerably more complex near the margins of salt basins, where carbonate and clastic rocks 14 may be deposited at the same time and interbedded with, more mobile, evaporite strata. In these 15 cases, syn-depositional salt flow may occur due to density differences in the deposited 16 lithologies, although our understanding of this process and related produces is relatively poor. 17 We here use 3D seismic reflection and borehole data from the Devil’s Hole Horst, West Central 18 Shelf, offshore UK to understand the genesis, geometry and kinematic of intra-Zechstein 19 Supergroup (Lopingian) minibasins and their effect on post-depositional salt deformation.
    [Show full text]
  • Boek Iwan.Indd
    GEOLOGICA ULTRAIECTINA Mededelingen van de Faculteit Geowetenschappen Universiteit Utrecht No. 270 Stratigraphical and structural setting of the Palaeogene siliciclastic sediments in the Dutch part of the North Sea Basin Iwan de Lugt 1 Cover illustration: a well log from the North Sea Basin This research was carried out at the Stratigraphy-Paleontology Group, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University and was financed by the Netherlands Institute of Applied Geoscience, TNO-NITG. Address: Budapestlaan 4 3584 CD Utrecht The Netherlands Internet site: www.geo.uu.nl ISBN-10: 90-5744-135-7 ISBN-13: 978-90-5744-135-6 2 Stratigraphical and structural setting of the Palaeogene siliciclastic sediments in the Dutch part of the North Sea Basin Stratigrafie en tektoniek van de Palaeogene siliciklastische sedimenten in het Nederlandse gedeelte van het Noordzeebekken (met een samenvatting in het Nederlands) PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit Utrecht op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof. dr. W.H. Gispen ingevolge het besluit van het college voor promoties in het openbaar te verdedigen op maandag 15 januari 2007 des middags te 12.45 uur. door Iwan Rommert de Lugt geboren op 31 maart 1975 te Leiderdorp, Nederland 3 Promotores: Prof. Dr. Th.E. Wong Prof. Dr. J.E. Meulenkamp 4 ... a good idea stated within an insufficient theoretical frame loses its explanatory power and is forgotten. Hans Reichenbach (1957) They are grubby little creatures of the sea floor 530 million years old, but we greet them with awe because they are the Old Ones, and they are trying to tell us something.
    [Show full text]
  • Induced Seismicity of the Groningen Gas Field: History and Recent Developments K
    Induced seismicity of the Groningen gas field: History and recent developments K. van Thienen-Visser1 and J. N. Breunese1 Abstract For the large Groningen field, the first seismic event was Induced seismicity of the Groningen gas field is caused by recorded in 1991. The largest magnitude was an ML 3.6 event the production of gas. Because of the large areal extent of the on 16 August 2012. Even though the magnitude of the event reservoir, the long history of depletion, and the available data sets was, seismologically speaking, not high, intensities as high as VI (which exist as a result of consequences and public unrest caused were observed because of the shallow depth of the event (3 km, by induced seismicity), the field presents a valuable case for i.e., reservoir depth) and the soft surface soils in the area (TNO, studying the relationships among geologic, flow-dynamic, geo- 2013a), causing damage to houses in the area. mechanical, and seismological models. Gas production from the Until 2012, a maximum magnitude of 3.9, with a probabil- Groningen field started in 1963. Induced seismicity of the field ity of exceedance of 16% (van Eck et al., 2006), was seen as the first was recorded in 1991 (ML 2.4). During the subsequent 10 upper size limit for induced seismicity in the north of the Nether- years, induced seismicity stayed at a rate of about five events (ML lands. However, since 2003, seismicity in the field has increased ≥ 1.5) per year. Starting in 2003, the number of events and mag- in number and magnitude.
    [Show full text]
  • REGIONAL GEOLOGY by Graham K. Lott
    CHAPTER II REGIONAL GEOLOGY by Graham K. Lott The ‘quarrying’ and use of local stone in Notting- the Triassic comprises a thick succession of non- hamshire, for both building and decorative purposes, marine, green-grey to reddish brown sandstones, dates back to Roman times. However, the lithological siltstones and mudstones, the latter including thinly units that characterise the geological succession interbedded, grey-green, dolomitic, very fine grained within the county contain only a few beds of stone sandstones (known locally as skerry). In contrast, the suitable for these purposes. This lack of indigenous early Jurassic marine succession is only sporadically stone useful for decorative carving is reflected in the exposed along the northern edge of the low-lying composition of the suite of carved stone fragments Vale of Belvoir and comprises a succession of grey that have been studied as part of this Corpus project. limestones and mudstones (Lias Group). The eastern By far the majority of the stones examined consist part of the county is locally blanketed by extensive of lithologies (primarily sandstones and limestones) tracts of glacial and alluvial sediments (unconsolidated sourced from outside the county border. sands, gravels, clays and muds) of Quaternary age. carboniferous THE GEOLOGY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE Pennine Coal Measures Group Nottinghamshire has a relatively simple geological The Carboniferous rocks that crop out in the west of succession comprising a sequence of eastwards- the county form part of the Pennine Coal Measures dipping sedimentary rock units whose outcrops Group. This succession is best known economically extend from north to south across the county (see for its coal reserves but also contains a number of Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Groningen Field – an Overview
    Netherlands Journal of Geosciences — Geologie en Mijnbouw |96 – 5 | s3–s15 | 2017 doi:10.1017/njg.2017.22 Geology of the Groningen field – an overview JandeJager1,∗ & Clemens Visser2 1 Nassaukade 42, 2281 XD Rijswijk, the Netherlands 2 Nederlandse Aardolie Maatschappij B.V., Schepersmaat 2, 9405 TA Assen, the Netherlands ∗ Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Manuscript received: 27 February 2017, accepted: 21 July 2017 Abstract After more than half a century of production and with some 350 wells, the Groningen gas field must be one of the best-studied gas fields in the world. Initially, it was considered to be relatively simple and behaving like one big tank. Now that it is entering a phase of declining production it has become clear that many subtleties are not fully understood yet. Prediction and management of subsidence and induced earth tremors require a detailed understanding of the field geology. In addition, an optimum gas recovery is only possible if details of, for example, reservoir quality distribution and faulting, that did not appear relevant before, are well understood. The large Groningen field comprises a structurally high block during much of its history, probably already from Devonian times onwards. The desert sandstones of the Rotliegend reservoir exhibit a strong south-to-north proximal–distal relationship. Whilst diagenesis has in many fields led to deterioration of reservoir properties, this effect is small in the Groningen field. The field is dipping to the north, and bounded by a series ofnormal faults in the west, south and east. Almost all faults are normal extensional faults, but locally inverse reactivation has led to small pop-up structures.
    [Show full text]