DOCSLIB.ORG

Tectono-Stratigraphic Charts of the Netherlands Continental Shelf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

February 2011 TNO.NL Late Jurassic - Early Cretaceous structural elements of the Netherlands Late Jurassic - Early Cretaceous structural elements of the Netherlands 3˚E 4˚E 5˚E 6˚E 7˚E 55˚N DCG SG ESH ESP Legend Highs SP SGP Platforms 54˚N Cretaceous or Paleogene on top of Zechstein Cretaceous or Paleogene on top of Triassic Basins CP TB Strongly inverted AP Mildly or not inverted Boundary of structural element COP Boundary of subarea used in mapping project Highs GP VB FP DH Dalfsen High ESH Elbow Spit High 53˚N LBM London-Brabant Massif MH Maasbommel High BFB LSB PH Peel High TIJH TIJH Texel-IJsselmeer High NHP WH Winterton High WH DH Platforms AP Ameland Platform WP IJP COP Central Offshore Platform CP Cleaverbank Platform CNB ESP Elbow Spit Platform FP Friesland Platform GP Groningen Platform WNB 52˚N NHP Noord-Holland Platform PP Peel Platform MH RP Roer Platform LBM SGP Schill Grund Platform SP Silverpit Platform WP Winterton Platform RP IJP IJmuiden Platform RVG PP Basins LBM PH BFB Broad Fourteens Basin DCG Dutch Central Graben CNB Central Netherlands Basin LSB Lower Saxony Basin 51˚N RVG Roer Valley Graben SG Step Graben 0 60 km LBM TB Terschelling Basin VB Vlieland Basin WNB West Netherlands Basin Tectono-stratigraphic chart of the Dutch Central Graben, Terschelling Basin and surrounding platforms Ameland Platform Eastern margin (west) and Age of Central Off- Schill Grund Tectonic Hydrostratigraphy (Ma) System Series Stages Lithology shore Platform Southern Dutch Central Graben Terschelling Basin Platform (south) phase Orogeny 0 Holocene 0 Various Various Various Various Quaternary Pleistocene Gelasian Piacenzian 5 Pliocene Zanclean NUOT NUOT 5 Messinian 10 Tortonian 10 Neogene Serravallian 15 Miocene Langhian L06-02 & L06-03 M07-01 15 Burdigalian NUBA NUBA NUBA 20 20 A Aquitanian 25 Savian 25 Chattian 30 Oligocene 30 Rupelian NMRF NMRF NMRF NMRF 35 35 Priabonian Pyrenean 40 Bartonian 40 Paleogene G16-06 45 Eocene Lutetian 45 NLFF NLFF NLFF NLFF 50 50 Legend Ypresian 55 55 Thanetian G16-06 Age-range of well based NLLF NLLF NLLF NLLF on biostratigraphic analyses 60 Paleocene Selandian 60 Danian Laramide 65 CKEK CKEK 65 E Sand, sandstone N Maastrichtian I L03-02 P 70 L 70 A Shale, claystone 75 75 Campanian Subhercynian Marl 80 CKGR CKGR CKGR 80 Upper 85 Santonian 85 Chalk Coniacian 90 90 Turonian Carbonate 95 95 Cenomanian CKTX CKTX CKTX Anhydrite 100 100 Salt 105 105 Cretaceous Albian 110 110 Coal KNGL KNGL KNGL KNGL Austrian 115 115 Organic Aptian 120 120 Lower Flint 125 125 Barremian 130 130 Glauconite KNNC KNNC F17-03 KNNC KNNC Hauterivian 135 135 Hiatus Valanginian L01-05 KNNS KNNS KNNS 140 140 L03-01 L09-02 Aquifer Ryazanian Late Kimmerian 145 SG SG 145 Portlandian Aquifer/aquitard 150 SLC 150 Kimmeridgian Upper 155 F18-07 155 Aquitard Oxfordian 160 F17-07 160 SLC Aquiclude Callovian 165 165 Bathonian Mid Kimmerian Hydrocarbon source rock Middle 170 Bajocian 170 ATWD Jurassic Aalenian Gas reservoir 175 175 180 Toarcian 180 Oil reservoir ATPO 185 185 Pliensbachian Lower Various Quaternary formations 190 190 ATAL NU Upper North Sea Group Sinemurian 195 195 NUOT Oosterhout Formation NUBA Breda Formation Hettangian 200 200 ATRT Rhaetian NM Middle North Sea Group 205 Early Kimmerian 205 NMRF Rupel Formation 210 210 NL Lower North Sea Group 215 Norian 215 NLFF Dongen Formation Upper NLLF Landen Formation 220 220 225 RNKP 225 CK Chalk Group Triassic CKEK Ekofisk Formation 230 230 CKGR Ommelanden Formation Carnian CKTX Texel Formation 235 235 Ladinian RNKP 240 240 KN Rijnland Group Middle RNMU RNMU KNGL Holland Formation Anisian 245 RNSO+RNRO RNSO+RNRO 245 KNNC Vlieland Claystone Formation RBM RBM Hardegsen KNNS Vlieland Sandstone Formation Olenekian 250 Lower RBSH RBSH RBSH RBSH 250 Induan Changhsian 255 ZE-salt ZE-salt ZE-salt ZE-salt 255 SG Scruff Group Lopingian Wuchiapingian SL Schieland Group ZE ZE ZE ZE 260 260 SLC Central Graben Subgroup Capitanian 265 Guadalupian ROSL + ROCL ROSL + ROCL ROSL + ROCL ROSL + ROCL 265 Wordian AT Altena Group ATWD Werkendam Formation 270 Roadian 270 Kungurian ATPO Posidonia Formation 275 Permian 275 ATAL Aalburg Formation ATRT Sleen Formation 280 Artinskian 280 RN Upper Germanic Trias Group 285 Cisuralian Saalian 285 RNKP Keuper Formation 290 Sakmarian 290 RNMU Muschelkalk Formation RNRO Röt Formation 295 295 RNSO Solling Formation Asselian 300 300 Stephanian RB Lower Germanic Trias Group Asturian RBM Main Buntsandstein Subgroup 305 DCHP 305 DCDG RBSH Main Claystone Formation DCCU DCCU 310 310 Westphalian DCCR Silesian DCCK DCCB N ZE Zechstein Group 315 A 315 C S Sudetian I R 320 Namurian DCGE DCGE DCGE DCGE A 320 RO Upper Rotliegend Group V ROCL Silverpit Formation 325 325 ROSL Slochteren Formation Carboni- 330 330 ferous DC Limburg Group DCHP Step Graben Formation 335 Visean 335 DCDG Hospital Ground Formation 340 340 DCCU Maurits Formation Dinantian CL/CF CL/CF CL/CF CL/CF DCCR Ruurlo Formation 345 345 DCCB Baarlo Formation 350 350 DCGE Epen Formation Tournaisian 355 355 CL Carboniferous Limestone Group CF Farne Group Timescale and ages mostly according to Gradstein et al. (2004), except (1) the Triassic (according to Kozur & Bachmann (2008)), (2) the Upper Jurassic (according to Munsterman & Verreussel (in prep)) and (3) the Quaternary (according to the International Commission on Stratigraphy (2009)). The Western European nomenclature is used for the Carboniferous series and stages. Tectono-stratigraphic chart of the Schill Grund, Ameland and Friesland Platforms Age Schill Grund Platform Ameland Platform Tectonic Hydrostratigraphy (Ma) System Series Stages Lithology (central and north) (central and east) Friesland Platform phase Orogeny 0 Holocene 0 Quaternary Pleistocene Gelasian Various Various Various Piacenzian NUOT NUOT NUOT 5 Pliocene Zanclean 5 Messinian 10 Tortonian 10 NUBA NUBA Neogene Serravallian 15 Miocene Langhian 15 Burdigalian G10-01 NUBA 20 20 Aquitanian B 25 Savian 25 Chattian 30 Oligocene 30 Rupelian NMRF NMRF NMRF 35 35 Priabonian Pyrenean 40 Bartonian 40 Paleogene 45 Eocene Lutetian 45 NLFF NLFF NLFF 50 50 Ypresian 55 55 Thanetian NLLF NLLF N04-01 NLLF 60 Paleocene Selandian 60 Danian Laramide 65 CKEK 65 Legend E N Maastrichtian I P 70 L 70 A G10-01 Age-range of well based 75 75 on biostratigraphic analyses Campanian Subhercynian 80 CKGR CKGR CKGR 80 Sand, sandstone Upper 85 Santonian 85 Shale, claystone Coniacian 90 90 Turonian Marl 95 95 Cenomanian CKTX CKTX CKTX 100 100 Chalk 105 105 Cretaceous Albian Carbonate 110 110 KNGL KNGL KNGL Austrian Anhydrite 115 115 Aptian Salt 120 120 Lower 125 125 Coal Barremian 130 130 Organic Hauterivian KNNC KNNC KNNC 135 135 M05-01 Valanginian Flint 140 KNNS 140 SGGS SG Ryazanian Late Kimmerian 145 145 Glauconite Portlandian 150 150 Hiatus Kimmeridgian Upper F15-06 155 155 Aquifer Oxfordian SLC 160 160 Callovian Aquifer/aquitard 165 165 Bathonian Mid Kimmerian Middle 170 Bajocian 170 Aquitard Jurassic Aalenian 175 175 Aquiclude 180 Toarcian 180 Hydrocarbon source rock 185 185 Pliensbachian Lower Gas reservoir 190 190 Sinemurian 195 195 Oil reservoir Hettangian 200 200 Rhaetian Various Quaternary formations 205 Early Kimmerian 205 NU Upper North Sea Group 210 210 NUOT Oosterhout Formation NUBA Breda Formation 215 Norian 215 Upper NM Middle North Sea Group 220 220 NMRF Rupel Formation 225 225 Triassic NL Lower North Sea Group 230 230 NLFF Dongen Formation Carnian NLLF Landen Formation 235 235 Ladinian RNKP 240 240 CK Chalk Group Middle RNMU CKEK Ekofisk Formation Anisian 245 RNSO + RNRO RN 245 CKGR Ommelanden Formation RBM RBM Hardegsen CKTX Texel Formation Olenekian 250 Lower RBSH RBSH 250 Induan RBSH Changhsian 255 ZE-salt ZE-salt ZE-salt 255 KN Rijnland Group Lopingian Wuchiapingian KNGL Holland Formation ZE ZE ZE 260 260 KNNC Vlieland Claystone Formation Capitanian KNNS Vlieland Sandstone Formation 265 Guadalupian ROSL + ROCL ROSL + ROCL ROSL + ROCL 265 Wordian 270 Roadian 270 Kungurian SG Scruff Group 275 Permian 275 SGGS Scruff Greensand Formation SLC Central Graben Subgroup 280 Artinskian 280 RN Upper Germanic Trias Group 285 Cisuralian Saalian 285 RNKP Keuper Formation 290 Sakmarian 290 RNMU Muschelkalk Formation RNRO Röt Formation 295 295 RNSO Solling Formation Asselian 300 300 Stephanian RB Lower Germanic Trias Group Asturian RBM Main Buntsandstein Subgroup 305 DCHP 305 DCDG RBSH Main Claystone Formation DCCU 310 Westphalian 310 DCCR DCCR Silesian DCCB DCCB N ZE Zechstein Group 315 M03-01 A 315 C S Sudetian I R 320 Namurian DCGE DCGE DCGE A 320 RO Upper Rotliegend Group V ROCL Silverpit Formation 325 325 ROSL Slochteren Formation Carboni- 330 330 ferous DC Limburg Group DCHP Step Graben Formation 335 Visean 335 DCDG Hospital Ground Formation 340 340 DCCU Maurits Formation Dinantian CL/CF CL/CF CL/CF DCCR Ruurlo Formation 345 345 DCCB Baarlo Formation 350 350 DCGE Epen Formation Tournaisian 355 355 CL Carboniferous Limestone Group CF Farne Group Timescale and ages mostly according to Gradstein et al. (2004), except (1) the Triassic (according to Kozur & Bachmann (2008)), (2) the Upper Jurassic (according to Munsterman & Verreussel (in prep)) and (3) the Quaternary (according to the International Commission on Stratigraphy (2009)). The Western European nomenclature is used for the Carboniferous series and stages. Tectono-stratigraphic chart of the Step Graben, Dutch Central Graben and adjacent platforms and high Schill Grund Age Elbow Spit High & Dutch Central Platform Tectonic Hydrostratigraphy (Ma) System Series Stages Lithology Elbow Spit Platform Step Graben Graben (western margin) phase Orogeny 0 Holocene
Recommended publications
  • EBN Internship Report Confidential

    EBN Internship Report Confidential

    EBN Internship Report Confidential Anja Dijkhuizen 3026051 Part I: Basin analysis of Tertiary deposits in the Gorredijk concession using 3D seismics and well data Part II: Extra Work Supervision: Maarten-Jan Brolsma, Guido Hoetz, Fokko van Hulten; EBN Prof. Dr. Chris Spiers; UU EBN September – November 2011 Part I: Basin analysis of Tertiary deposits in the Gorredijk concession using 3D seismics and well data 2 Basin analysis of Tertiary deposits in the Gorredijk concession using 3D seismics and well-data EBN-Internship Anja Dijkhuizen The 1000m thick Tertiary sequence present in the Dutch onshore subsurface can hold prospective reservoirs of shallow gas. In this report, an inventory of Tertiary reservoirs is made for the Gorredijk concession (Friesland, northern Netherlands). By using well, log and seismic data, the structural elements of the studied area are investigated. Thickness maps of the three Tertiary groups show a thickening trend towards the west. However, individual differences exist within the groups, implying basin shifts through the Tertiary Period. Gas migration would therefore be to the east, but timing is important due to the differences within each group. Indications of an erosive surface in the lower Tertiary Brussels Sand Member give more insight in the different Alpine phase pulses during the Tertiary. A large erosive event during the Miocene has eroded parts of the Upper Tertiary deposits. The associated angular unconformity, the ‘Mid Miocene Unconformity’, is shown not to be of tectonic but of sedimentary origin. Large Neogene delta foresets from the Eridanos deltaic system onlap on the Mid Miocene Unconformity. These delta deposits are so far only described to be found offshore.
  • A Reappraisal of the Stratigraphy of the Upper Miocene Unit X in The

    A Reappraisal of the Stratigraphy of the Upper Miocene Unit X in The

    GEOLOGICA BELGICA (2020) 23/3-4: xxx-xxx A reappraisal of the stratigraphy of the upper Miocene unit X in the Maaseik core, eastern Campine area (northern Belgium) Stephen LOUWYE1* & Noël VANDENBERGHE2 1 Paleontology and paleoenvironments, Department of Geology, Ghent University, Belgium; [email protected]. 2 Department Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, Belgium; [email protected]. * corresponding author ABSTRACT. The stratigraphy of the Tortonian-Messinian sequence from the Maaseik core, located on the shoulder of the Roer Valley Graben (RVG) in the eastern Campine area in northern Belgium, was improved. The analysis of the marine palynomorphs (dinoflagellate cysts and acritarchs) from the uppermost part of the Breda Formation, the unnamed unit X and the basal part of the Lower Waubach Member led to the recognition of the mid to upper Tortonian Hystrichosphaeropsis obscura biozone. Therefore deposition of this entire analyzed sequence took place sometime between 8.8 to 7.6 Ma. Paleoenvironmental interpretation of the palynomorphs points to shallow marine conditions and most probably a stressed environment during the deposition of unit X. A comparison with the time equivalent stratigraphy in the nearby Belgian Campine, the Dutch RVG and the German Lower Rhine Basin allowed the identification of the Inden Formation and required a shift in the base of the Kieseloolite Formation compared to the earlier lithostratigraphic interpretation of the Maaseik core. The regional stratigraphic scheme shows the progressive
  • Neogene Stratigraphy of the Langenboom Locality (Noord-Brabant, the Netherlands)

    Neogene Stratigraphy of the Langenboom Locality (Noord-Brabant, the Netherlands)

    Netherlands Journal of Geosciences — Geologie en Mijnbouw | 87 - 2 | 165 - 180 | 2008 Neogene stratigraphy of the Langenboom locality (Noord-Brabant, the Netherlands) E. Wijnker1'*, T.J. Bor2, F.P. Wesselingh3, D.K. Munsterman4, H. Brinkhiris5, A.W. Burger6, H.B. Vonhof7, K. Post8, K. Hoedemakers9, A.C. Janse10 & N. Taverne11 1 Laboratory of Genetics, Wageningen University, Arboretumlaan 4, 6703 BD Wageningen, the Netherlands. 2 Prinsenweer 54, 3363 JK Sliedrecht, the Netherlands. 3 Naturalis, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands. 4 TN0 B&0 - National Geological Survey, P.O. Box 80015, 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands. 5 Palaeocecology, Inst. Environmental Biology, Laboratory of Palaeobotany and Palynology, Utrecht University, Budapestlaan 4, 3584 CD Utrecht, the Netherlands. 6 P. Soutmanlaan 18, 1701 MC Heerhugowaard, the Netherlands. 7 Faculty Earth and Life Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, de Boelelaan 1085, 1081 EH Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 8 Natuurmuseum Rotterdam, P.O. Box 23452, 3001 KL Rotterdam, the Netherlands. 9 Minervastraat 23, B 2640 Mortsel, Belgium. 10 Gerard van Voornestraat 165, 3232 BE Brielle, the Netherlands. 11 Snipweg 14, 5451 VP Mill, the Netherlands. * corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Manuscript received: February 2007; accepted: March 2008 Abstract The locality of Langenboom (eastern Noord-Brabant, the Netherlands), also known as Mill, is famous for its Neogene molluscs, shark teeth, teleost remains, birds and marine mammals. The stratigraphic context of the fossils, which have been collected from sand suppletions, was hitherto poorly understood. Here we report on a section which has been sampled by divers in the adjacent flooded sandpit 'De Kuilen' from which the Langenboom sands have been extracted.
  • Geophysical Site Investigation Survey Dutch Continental Shelf, North Sea

    Geophysical Site Investigation Survey Dutch Continental Shelf, North Sea

    Site Studies Wind Farm Zone Borssele Geophysical Survey Wind Farm Site IV Fugro Survey B.V. Geophysical Site Investigation Survey Dutch Continental Shelf, North Sea Borssele Wind Farm Development Zone Wind Farm Site IV 25 May to 20 June 2015 Fugro (FSBV) Report No.: GH157-R2 Fugro (FOSPA) Document No.: 687/15-J322 Rijksdienst voor Ondernemend Nederland Client Reference: WOZ15000012 Revision A This page is intentionally left blank. RIJKSDIENST VOOR ONDERNEMEND NEDERLAND GEOPHYSICAL SITE INVESTIGATION SURVEY, BORSSELE WIND FARM SITE IV Prepared by: Fugro Survey B.V. 12 Veurse Achterweg P.O. Box 128 2260 AC Leidschendam The Netherlands Phone +31 70 3111800 Fax +31 70 3111838 E-mail: [email protected] Trade Register Nr: 34070322 / VAT Nr:005621409B11 Prepared for: Rijksdienst voor Ondernemend Nederland PO Box 93144 2509 AC Den Haag The Netherlands A Final Issue M. Marchetti V. Minorenti P-P Lebbink 14 August 2015 D. Taliana 0 Issue for Approval M. Marchetti V. Minorenti P-P Lebbink 03 August 2015 D. Taliana 1 Issue for Approval M. Marchetti V. Minorenti P-P Lebbink 06 July 2015 D. Taliana Rev Description Prepared Checked Approved Date FSBV / GH157-R2 / Rev A Page i of viii RIJKSDIENST VOOR ONDERNEMEND NEDERLAND GEOPHYSICAL SITE INVESTIGATION SURVEY, BORSSELE WIND FARM SITE IV REPORT AMENDMENT SHEET Issue Report Page Table Figure Description No. section No. No. No. FSBV / GH157-R2 / Rev A Page ii of viii RIJKSDIENST VOOR ONDERNEMEND NEDERLAND GEOPHYSICAL SITE INVESTIGATION SURVEY, BORSSELE WIND FARM SITE IV Keyplan FSBV / GH157-R2 / Rev A
  • Review the Mineralogy of Suspended Matter, Fresh and Cenozoic Sediments in the fluvio-Deltaic Rhine–Meuse–Scheldt–Ems Area, the Netherlands: an Overview and Review

    Review the Mineralogy of Suspended Matter, Fresh and Cenozoic Sediments in the fluvio-Deltaic Rhine–Meuse–Scheldt–Ems Area, the Netherlands: an Overview and Review

    Netherlands Journal of Geosciences — Geologie en Mijnbouw |95 – 1 | 23–107 | 2016 doi:10.1017/njg.2015.32 Review The mineralogy of suspended matter, fresh and Cenozoic sediments in the fluvio-deltaic Rhine–Meuse–Scheldt–Ems area, the Netherlands: An overview and review J. Griffioen1,∗,G.Klaver2 &W.E.Westerhoff3 1 TNO Geological Survey of the Netherlands, P.O. Box 80 015, 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands and Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80 115, 3508 TC Utrecht, the Netherlands 2 Formerly BRGM, Laboratories Division, 3 av. C. Guillemin, BP36009, 45060 Orleans, France; Le Studium, CNRS, Orleans, France; TNO Geological Survey of the Netherlands, P.O. Box 80 015, 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands 3 TNO Geological Survey of the Netherlands, P.O. Box 80 015, 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands ∗ Corresponding author. Email: jasper.griffi[email protected] Manuscript received: 18 March 2015, accepted: 13 October 2015 Abstract Minerals are the building blocks of clastic sediments and play an important role with respect to the physico-chemical properties of the sediment and the lithostratigraphy of sediments. This paper aims to provide an overview of the mineralogy (including solid organic matter) of sediments as well as suspended matter as found in the Netherlands (and some parts of Belgium). The work is based on a review of the scientific literature published over more than 100 years. Cenozoic sediments are addressed together with suspended matter and recent sediments of the surface water systems because they form a geoscientific continuum from material subject to transport via recently settled to aged material.
  • SGSI 7 161-176 Janssen.Indd 161 11-11-10 08:57 162 Janssen

    SGSI 7 161-176 Janssen.Indd 161 11-11-10 08:57 162 Janssen

    Pteropods (Mollusca, Euthecosomata) from the Early Eocene of Rotterdam (The Netherlands) Arie W. Janssen Janssen, A.W. Pteropods (Mollusca, Euthecosomata) from the Early Eocene of Rotterdam (The Nether- lands). Scripta Geologica Special Issue, 7: 161-175, 17 figs., 2 tables, Leiden, December 2010. Arie W. Janssen, Nederlands Centrum voor Biodiversiteit Naturalis, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands, and 12, Triq tal’Hamrija, Xewkija XWK 9033, Gozo, Malta ([email protected]). Key words – Mollusca, Gastropoda, Thecosomata, pteropods, The Netherlands, Eocene, Ypresian, bio- stratigraphy. A borehole was drilled at Rotterdam in 1955 as a demonstration during the E55 exhibition. Holoplank- tonic molluscs (pteropods) were found to be present in the interval 504.5-655.0 m below rotary table (= RT). The upper sample of Middle Eocene (Lutetian) age yielded just a few unidentifiable limacinids. The section between 507.5-607.0 m, of Early Eocene (Ypresian) age, yielded poorly preserved pteropods and demonstrated that the complete interval belongs to pteropod zone 9. Apart from the most abundant species, Camptoceratops priscus, which is the index taxon of pteropod zone 9, the section yielded Helico- noides mercinensis and Limacina taylori, which are known to accompany the index species. Two further limacinid species are described as new to science, viz. Limacina erasmiana sp. nov. and L. guersi sp. nov., to date not known from elsewhere in the North Sea Basin. The occurrence of L. pygmaea in a restricted interval (569.0-574.0 m-RT) is remarkable; it is generally considered to be of Lutetian age, but also is found in the Ypresian of Gan, southwest France.
  • An Updated and Revised Stratigraphic Framework for the Miocene And

    An Updated and Revised Stratigraphic Framework for the Miocene And

    Netherlands Journal of An updated and revised stratigraphic Geosciences framework for the Miocene and earliest www.cambridge.org/njg Pliocene strata of the Roer Valley Graben and adjacent blocks Original Article Dirk K. Munsterman1 , Johan H. ten Veen1 , Armin Menkovic1, Jef Deckers2, 1 3 1 Cite this article: Munsterman DK, ten Veen JH, Nora Witmans , Jasper Verhaegen , Susan J. Kerstholt-Boegehold , Menkovic A, Deckers J, Witmans N, 1 1 Verhaegen J, Kerstholt-Boegehold SJ, van de Tamara van de Ven and Freek S. Busschers Ven T, and Busschers FS. An updated and revised stratigraphic framework for the 1TNO – Geological Survey of the Netherlands, P.O. Box 80015, 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands; 2VITO, Flemish Miocene and earliest Pliocene strata of the Roer Institute for Technological Research, Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium and 3Department of Earth and Valley Graben and adjacent blocks. Netherlands Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200E, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium Journal of Geosciences, Volume 98, e8. https:// doi.org/10.1017/njg.2019.10 Abstract Received: 23 January 2019 In the Netherlands, the bulk of the Miocene to lowest Pliocene sedimentary succession is cur- Revised: 1 November 2019 Accepted: 8 November 2019 rently assigned to a single lithostratigraphical unit, the Breda Formation. Although the forma- tion was introduced over 40 years ago, the definition of its lower and upper boundaries is still Keywords: problematic. Well-log correlations show that the improved lecto-stratotype for the Breda dinoflagellate cysts; lithostratigraphy; Formation in well Groote Heide partly overlaps with the additional reference section of the Neogene; seismic; southern North Sea Basin; well-log correlation older Veldhoven Formation in the nearby well Broekhuizenvorst.
  • Evaluation of Belgian Clays for Manufacturing Compressed Earth Blocks Lavie A

    Evaluation of Belgian Clays for Manufacturing Compressed Earth Blocks Lavie A

    GEOLOGICA BELGICA (2019) 22/3-4: 139-148 Evaluation of Belgian clays for manufacturing compressed earth blocks Lavie A. MANGO-ITULAMYA1*, Frédéric COLLIN2, Pascal PILATE3, Fabienne COURTEJOIE4 & Nathalie FAGEL1. 1Argiles, Géochimie et Environnement sédimentaires, University of Liège, Quartier Agora, 14 allée du 6 août, 4000 Liège, Belgium. 2Géotechnique, University of Liège, Quartier Polytech, 4000 Liège, Belgium. 3Belgian Ceramic Research Centre, 4 Av. du Gouverneur E. Cornez, 7000 Mons, Belgium. 4Architecture, University of Liège, 41 Boulevard de la Constitution, 4020 Liège, Belgium. * corresponding author: [email protected]. ABSTRACT. This study aims to characterize Belgian clays in order to evaluate their use for manufacture of compressed earth blocks (CEB). Nineteen Belgian clay deposits were sampled in 56 sites and 135 samples were collected and analyzed. The analyses focus on the determination of particle size, plasticity, nature and mineralogy as the main characteristics for assessing the suitability of the raw clays to make CEB. These analyses allow for classifying the sampled clay deposits in three categories: clays that can be used unchanged to make CEB (2 clay deposits), clays that are suitable for the manufacture of CEB but require addition of sand and gravel particles (13 clay deposits) and clays that are suitable for the manufacture of CEB if they are mixed with other raw clays (4 clay deposits). In order to verify the use of these clays, five of them served as a model for making CEB. The strength of these bricks was evaluated by testing for compressive strength and abrasion resistance. The results of these tests confirm the suitability or not of the sampled clays for the manufacture of CEB.
  • A Partial Rostrum of the Porbeagle Shark

    A Partial Rostrum of the Porbeagle Shark

    GEOLOGICA BELGICA (2010) 13/1-2: 61-76 A PARTIAL ROSTRUM OF THE PORBEAGLE SHARK LAMNA NASUS (LAMNIFORMES, LAMNIDAE) FROM THE MIOCENE OF THE NORTH SEA BASIN AND THE TAXONOMIC IMPORTANCE OF ROSTRAL MORPHOLOGY IN EXTINCT SHARKS Frederik H. MOLLEN (4 figures, 3 plates) Elasmobranch Research, Meistraat 16, B-2590 Berlaar, Belgium; E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. A fragmentary rostrum of a lamnid shark is recorded from the upper Miocene Breda Formation at Liessel (Noord-Brabant, The Netherlands); it constitutes the first elasmobranch rostral process to be described from Neogene strata in the North Sea Basin. Based on key features of extant lamniform rostra and CT scans of chondrocrania of modern Lamnidae, the Liessel specimen is assigned to the porbeagle shark, Lamna nasus (Bonnaterre, 1788). In addition, the taxonomic significance of rostral morphology in extinct sharks is discussed and a preliminary list of elasmobranch taxa from Liessel is presented. KEYWORDS. Lamniformes, Lamnidae, Lamna, rostrum, shark, rostral node, rostral cartilages, CT scans. 1. Introduction Pliocene) of North Carolina (USA), detailed descriptions and discussions were not presented, unfortunately. Only In general, chondrichthyan fish fossilise only under recently has Jerve (2006) reported on an ongoing study of exceptional conditions and (partial) skeletons of especially two Miocene otic capsules from the Calvert Formation large species are extremely rare (Cappetta, 1987). (lower-middle Miocene) of Maryland (USA); this will Therefore, the fossil record of Lamniformes primarily yield additional data to the often ambiguous dental studies. comprises only teeth (see e.g. Agassiz, 1833-1844; These well-preserved cranial structures were stated to be Leriche, 1902, 1905, 1910, 1926), which occasionally are homologous to those seen in extant lamnids and thus available as artificial, associated or natural tooth sets useful for future phylogenetic studies of this group.
  • Alisocysta Margarita Zone, 213-14, 220 Angulata Zone, 244

    Alisocysta Margarita Zone, 213-14, 220 Angulata Zone, 244

    Index Acadian Orogeny, 198 bed forms accommodation space migration, 44 and accumulation rates, 104 wave-modified, 52 condensed sections, 81 Beinn Iaruinn Quartzite, 262, 264 and cyclothems, 69 Belemnite Bed, 238, 244-5, 251 depositional response, 267 Belgium, 213 ooid shoals, 66 berthierine, 98-100 overprinting, 71 Binnein Quartzite, 266 and oxygen conditions, 82 biostratigraphic zones acritarchs, 206 Kimmeridge Clay, 87 Agat, 150, 159-61 Portlandian, 111 aggradation Turonian, 181, 183 Kimmeridge Clay, 83 biostratigraphical control, 2 Palaeocene, 223 biostratigraphical gaps, 111, 113 shelf margins, 37 bioturbation, 70, 91, 131 tidal flats, 71 Birnbeck Limestone Formation, 67, 69-70 albaniZone, 109, 115, 118, 123, 137 Bituminous Shales, 84, 238, 239 algaenans, 90 black shales, 77, 80, 82 Alisocysta margarita Zone, 213-14, 220 Black Ven Marls, 244, 248 allocycles, 72 Blea Wyke Sandstone Formation, 239, 248 Allt Goibhre Formation, 262, 264 Blue Lias, 82, 244-5,248 Alpine tectonics, 224 Blyth-Acklington dyke, 225 Alum Shales, 239 bone-beds, 98 Amazon Fan, 159 environments, 103 ammonites, 41-2, 48, 56, 109, 178 geochemistry, 101 biostratigraphy, 181, 231 bottom currents, 150, 159 amorphous organic matter, 77, 89-90 bottom water, volume, 82-3 Anglo-Paris Basin, 218 Boulonnais, 83, 85 anguiformis Zone, 131, 133, 139 brachiopods, 206 angulata Zone, 244 Branscombe Hardground, 193 anoxia, 81-2, 218 Breathitt Group, 36 and uranium, 235 British Tertiary Igneous Province, 224-6 apatite, 100-1,103 Bronnant Fault, 205 Apectodinium hyperacanthum Zone,
  • Geology of the Dutch Coast

    Geology of the Dutch Coast

    Geology of the Dutch coast The effect of lithological variation on coastal morphodynamics Deltores Title Geology of the Dutch coast Client Project Reference Pages Rijkswaterstaat Water, 1220040-007 1220040-007-ZKS-0003 43 Verkeer en Leefomgeving Keywords Geology, erodibility, long-term evolution, coastal zone Abstract This report provides an overview of the build-up of the subsurface along the Dutch shorelines. The overview can be used to identify areas where the morphological evolution is partly controlled by the presence of erosion-resistant deposits. The report shows that the build-up is heterogeneous and contains several erosion-resistant deposits that could influence both the short- and long-term evolution of these coastal zones and especially tidal channels. The nature of these resistant deposits is very variable, reflecting the diverse geological development of The Netherlands over the last 65 million years. In the southwestern part of The Netherlands they are mostly Tertiary deposits and Holocene peat-clay sequences that are relatively resistant to erosion. Also in South- and North-Holland Holocene peat-clay sequences have been preserved, but in the Rhine-Meuse river-mouth area Late Pleistocene• early Holocene floodplain deposits form additional resistant layers. In northern North-Holland shallow occurrences of clayey Eemian-Weichselian deposits influence coastal evolution. In the northern part of The Netherlands it are mostly Holocene peat-clay sequences, glacial till and over consolidated sand and clay layers that form the resistant deposits. The areas with resistant deposits at relevant depths and position have been outlined in a map. The report also zooms in on a few tidal inlets to quick scan the potential role of the subsurface in their evolution.
  • Early Geothermal Exploration in the Netherlands 1980 - 2000

    Early Geothermal Exploration in the Netherlands 1980 - 2000

    European Geothermal Congress 2019 Den Haag, The Netherlands, 11-14 June 2019 Early Geothermal Exploration in the Netherlands 1980 - 2000 F. Charles Dufour1, Jan Piet Heederik1 1 Former Groundwater Survey TNO - TNO Institute of Applied Geoscience [email protected] (main author) [email protected] (contact person) 1. INTRODUCTION Figure 2: Development of consumer price of gas in €ct per m3 in the Netherlands (1980 - 2010) From the point of view of introduction of geothermal energy in the Netherlands, the period, presented in this paper, was characterised by the following influential aspects. – Geothermal energy had to be an economic attractive alternative for the existing energy sources. Environmental aspects became an aspect of influence only after 1993. – Very restricted knowledge of reservoir characteristics of those formations with a potential for exploitation of geothermal energy was available. – Lack of any cooperation or support by the operating oil companies to submit the necessary more detailed Source: Several. Based on CBS information regarding reservoir characteristics in the period under consideration. Figure 3: Greenhouse gas price in €ct per m3 in the – Lack of any cooperation or support by the existing Netherlands (1975 - 1989) energy supply companies to give room to a demonstration project or to an introduction in housing areas under construction in the period under consideration. It was only in cooperation with ‘Nutsbedrijf Westland N.V.’ NBW that an energy supply company fully cooperated in the preparation of a geothermal project (1992). – Restraint with respect to the possibilities to exploit sandstone reservoirs for geothermal energy, based on experiences in France, where production occurred from carbonate reservoirs and tests of siliciclastic reservoirs had failed.