DOCSLIB.ORG

TECHNICAL DIFFERENCES in the PAINTED DECORATION of ANASAZI and HOHOKAM POTTERY by Ernest E. Leavitt, Jr. a Thesis Submitted to T

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TECHNICAL DIFFERENCES in the PAINTED DECORATION of ANASAZI and HOHOKAM POTTERY by Ernest E. Leavitt, Jr. a Thesis Submitted to T Technical differences in the painted decoration of Anasazi and Hohokam pottery Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Leavitt, Ernest Eastman, 1930- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 01/10/2021 15:10:52 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/551584 TECHNICAL DIFFERENCES IN THE PAINTED DECORATION OF ANASAZI AND HOHOKAM POTTERY by Ernest E. Leavitt, Jr. A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1962 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of require­ ments for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is de­ posited in The University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in their judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholar­ ship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED: APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: -3, / f '2—- EMIL W. HAURY Date Professor of Anthropology TECHNICAL DIFFERENCES IN THE PAINTED DECORATION OF ANASAZI AND HOHOKAM POTTERY by Ernest E. Leavitt, Jr. ABSTRACT Pottery is one of the most useful tools in Southwestern archae­ ology. If fully used, it may be an indicator of cultural relationships, movements, contacts, and developments. Better utilization may be achieved if comparative studies are conducted within traditions through time, and cross-culturally, through space. The thesis proposes a sys­ tem for establishing comparable classes of data formulated on a study of total decoration, using whole or restorable vessels. Pottery types prior to A. D. 1300 found in the Mesa Verde Branch of the Anasazi cul­ ture and the River Branch of the Hohokam culture are analyzed and com­ pared to illustrate the operation of the method. Decorations are analyzed and recorded following the approach of the painter in decoration construc­ tion through an understanding of the internal mechanics of geometric de­ sign. It is concluded that no direct relationship is exhibited in the pottery ii decoration of the two areas. Qualities which are inherent to design and those which are culturally determined or selected are discussed. The basic tenet of the paper is that similarities between ceramic groups, not through individual traits but through like complexes of traits, will suggest relationships which should be followed up by further archae­ ological investigations. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express appreciation for the assistance received in gathering the material on which this study has been based. I am grate­ ful for the time and guidance of Dr. Emil W. Haury, who first encour­ aged the study, and of Prof. Clara Lee Tanner and Dr. Raymond H. Thompson, members of the thesis committee. My wife, Virginia, who has assisted through many long hours in the production of the manu­ script, acted as co-worker in the commercial enterprise which initially exposed the problem and as advisor in its formulation and solution. Dr. Haury, Director of the Arizona State Museum, and Jean Pinkley of the Mesa Verde Museum, and the members of their respec­ tive staffs assisted me in many ways and made available the collections which form the basis of this study. Mrs. Earl H. Morris of Boulder, Colorado, permitted me to photograph the collection of her late husband. Dr. Earl H. Morris. The staff at Aztec National Monument aided in the gathering of information at the monument. Dr. Edward B. Danson, Director of the Museum of Northern Arizona, made it possible for me to study the collection at that institution. CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................ 1 2. METHOD OF ANALYSIS........................................ 4 Field of Decoration ..................................................................... 7 Layout............................................................................................ 10 Primary Layout ....................................................... •.......... 11 Secondary Layout............................................................... 17 Tertiary Layout .................................................... 19 Design........ ...... ............................................................................. 21 Elements ........... 22 U n its....................................................................................... 24 M o tifs..................................................................................... 24 Additional Qualities of Decoration ........................................... 37 Style ....................................................................................... 38 Motor Habit............................... 39 Size and Shape of the Vessel ............................................. 44 Filling of Space..................................................................... 45 Components............................................... 45 Space Other Than Components.................................... 47 S trictness............................................................................... 50 Complexity............................................................................. 51 C o n trast................................................................................. 52 Application of the M ethod........................................................... 53 3. ANALYSIS OF THE MESA VERDE TRADITION ...................... 56 v Page The Mesa Verde— Geography and Chronology.......................... 56 Mesa Verde Black-on-W hite.......................................................... 57 Mancos Black-on-W hite............................................................... 80 Cortez Black-on-White................................................................. 90 Piedra Black-on-White................................................................. 97 Chapin Black-on-White........................................................ 102 Summary of the Mesa Verde Tradition..................................... 103 4. ANALYSIS OF THE RIVER HOHOKAM TRADITION ............... 123 The River Hohokam—Geography and Chronology.................... 123 Sacaton Red-on-Buff..................................................................... 125 Santa Cruz Red-on-Buff ..................... 140 Gila Butte Red-on-Buff................................................................. 147 Snaketown Red-on-Buff................................................................. 149 Sweetwater Red-on-G ray......................................•...................... 155 Estrella Red-on-Gray........................... 157 Summary of the River Hohokam Tradition ...... ......................... 157 Casa Grande Red-on-Buff ............. 174 5. COMPARISON OF THE MESA VERDE AND HOHOKAM TRADITIONS..................... 179 6. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS............... 184 A GLOSSARY OF TERMINOLOGY.USED IN THIS STUDY---- 189 REFERENCES........................................... 194 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page 1. The stages of design construction ......................................... 6 2. Components of a typical Southwestern pottery design ........ 6 3. Some of the usual fields of decoration on Southwestern pottery vessels ..................................................................... 9 vi Figure Page 4. Characteristics of bands and bordering................................ 12 5. Types of sectioned lay o u t....................................................... 14 6. Types of centered layout.................................................... 16 7. Types of lateral layout........................................................ 16 8. Examples of problems encountered in distinguishing lay­ out types............................................................................ 18 9. Internal division of bands and sections . i ............................ 18 10. Secondary layout or internal organization of sections .... 20 11. Some internal organizations of band panels ......................... 20 12. The common elements of Southwestern geometric design . 23 13. Basic units in Southwestern geometric design .................... 25 14. Examples of design representing the nature of motif interaction.......................................................................... 29 15. Examples of design representing the types of interaction. 29 16. Common motifs in Southwestern geometric design ...... 32 17. Design units illustrating the relationship of symmetry and interaction •.................. .................................................. 36 18. Designs illustrating motifs with similar shapes using different design u n its............................................... 36 19. Examples of the varying characteristics of m otifs...... 36 20. The development
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Student Worksheet (Grades 6–8)
    Name ______________________ Pueblo Indian History for Kids Student Worksheet (Grades 6–8) Overview Pueblo Indian History for Kids is an online timeline that tells the history of the Pueblo Indian people of the American Southwest. The timeline covers more than 15,000 years of history! Use this worksheet to guide your exploration of the timeline. As you move through the timeline, answer the questions below. Keep a list of questions you have as you explore. Go to: www.crowcanyon.org/pueblohistorykids Introduction 1. Who are the Pueblo Indians? 2. What other names are used to describe this group of people? 3. Where is the Mesa Verde region? 4. What does “Mesa Verde” mean, and what is the region’s environment like? 5. How is the environment of the Mesa Verde region similar to the environment where you live? How is it different? 6. What are two ways we can learn about Pueblo history? Can you think of others? 1 Pueblo Indian History for Kids―Student Worksheet (6–8) Paleoindian 1. What does the term “hunter-gatherer” mean? 2. How would you describe how people in your culture acquire food? Where do you get your food? 3. Identify two similarities and two differences between your life and that of Paleoindian people. Archaic 1. There were several major differences between the Paleoindian and Archaic periods. What were they and what is the evidence for these differences? 2. What important tools were used during the Archaic period? How did they change ways of life for people in the Mesa Verde region? 3. Why do you think there is not as much evidence for how people lived during the Paleoindian and Archaic periods as there is for later time periods? 2 Pueblo Indian History for Kids―Student Worksheet (6–8) Basketmaker 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Physalis Longifolia in the U.S
    The Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology of Wild Tomatillos, Physalis longifolia Nutt., and Related Physalis Species: A Review1 ,2 3 2 2 KELLY KINDSCHER* ,QUINN LONG ,STEVE CORBETT ,KIRSTEN BOSNAK , 2 4 5 HILLARY LORING ,MARK COHEN , AND BARBARA N. TIMMERMANN 2Kansas Biological Survey, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA 3Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, MO, USA 4Department of Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA 5Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA *Corresponding author; e-mail: [email protected] The Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology of Wild Tomatillos, Physalis longifolia Nutt., and Related Physalis Species: A Review. The wild tomatillo, Physalis longifolia Nutt., and related species have been important wild-harvested foods and medicinal plants. This paper reviews their traditional use as food and medicine; it also discusses taxonomic difficulties and provides information on recent medicinal chemistry discoveries within this and related species. Subtle morphological differences recognized by taxonomists to distinguish this species from closely related taxa can be confusing to botanists and ethnobotanists, and many of these differences are not considered to be important by indigenous people. Therefore, the food and medicinal uses reported here include information for P. longifolia, as well as uses for several related taxa found north of Mexico. The importance of wild Physalis species as food is reported by many tribes, and its long history of use is evidenced by frequent discovery in archaeological sites. These plants may have been cultivated, or “tended,” by Pueblo farmers and other tribes. The importance of this plant as medicine is made evident through its historical ethnobotanical use, information in recent literature on Physalis species pharmacology, and our Native Medicinal Plant Research Program’s recent discovery of 14 new natural products, some of which have potent anti-cancer activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Pueblo Indian History for Kids Student Worksheet (Grades 4–6)
    Name ______________________ Pueblo Indian History for Kids Student Worksheet (Grades 4–6) Overview Pueblo Indian History for Kids is an online timeline that tells the history of the Pueblo Indian people of the American Southwest. The timeline covers more than 15,000 years of history! Use this worksheet to guide your exploration of the timeline. As you move through the timeline, answer the questions below. Keep a list of questions you have as you explore. Go to: www.crowcanyon.org/pueblohistorykids Introduction 1. Who are the Pueblo Indians? 2. What other names are used to describe this group of people? 3. Where is the Mesa Verde region? What is the environment like there? 4. How is the environment of the Mesa Verde region similar to the environment where you live? How is it different? 5. What are some of the different ways we can learn about the Pueblo past? 1 Pueblo Indian History for Kids―Student Worksheet (4–6) Paleoindian 1. What does the term “hunter-gatherer” mean? 2. How do you get your food? Where does it come from? Archaic 1. How is the Archaic period different than the Paleoindian period? 2. What two important tools were used during the Archaic time period? How were they used? Basketmaker 1. What made the Basketmaker time period different than the Archaic period? 2. Describe the diet of the Pueblo people during the Basketmaker time period. 3. What important structures were used during the Basketmaker period? How were they used? What structures do people use today with similar purposes? 2 Pueblo Indian History for Kids―Student Worksheet (4–6) Pueblo I 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resource Assessment Survey of the Peck Sink Storm Water Park Design Project Area in Hernando County, Florida
    CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT SURVEY OF THE PECK SINK STORM WATER PARK DESIGN PROJECT AREA IN HERNANDO COUNTY, FLORIDA Prepared for: Hernando County Board of County Commissioners 20 North Main Street Brooksville, Florida 34601 By: Archaeological Consultants, Inc. 8110 Blaikie Court, Suite A Sarasota, Florida 34240 Joan Deming - Project Manager Elizabeth A. Horvath and Lee Hutchinson - Project Archaeologists Justin Winkler and Nelson Rodriguez - Archaeologists In Association with: King Engineering Associates, Inc. 4921 Memorial Highway, Suite 300 Tampa, Florida 33634 September 2009 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Archaeological Consultants, Inc. (ACI) conducted a cultural resource assessment survey (CRAS) of the approximately 111-acre Peck Sink Storm Water Park Design project area (hereinafter referred to as Peck Sink) in Hernando County, Florida in June and July 2009. The purpose of this survey was to locate and identify any cultural resources within the project area, and to assess their significance in terms of eligibility for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). This survey was conducted for the Hernando County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC), and complies with Hernando County’s Comprehensive Plan (effective February 2006). This report also complies with Chapters 267 and 373, Florida Statutes (FS), Florida’s Coastal Management Program, and implementing state regulations regarding possible impact to significant historical properties. This report conforms to the specifications set forth in Chapter 1A-46, Florida Administrative Code (FAC) (revised August 21, 2002) and the Cultural Resource Management Standards and Operational Manual (Florida Division of Historical Resources [FDHR] 2003). Background research and a review of the Florida Master Site File (FMSF) and NRHP indicated that no archaeological sites have been recorded previously within the Peck Sink property.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    Great kivas as integrative architecture in the Silver Creek community, Arizona Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Herr, Sarah Alice, 1970- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 02/10/2021 15:30:52 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/278407 INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, soms thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SMOKING COMPLEX in the PREHISTORIC SOUTHWEST By
    The smoking complex in the prehistoric Southwest Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Simmons, Ellin A. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 30/09/2021 00:29:48 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/552017 THE SMOKING COMPLEX IN THE PREHISTORIC SOUTHWEST by Ellin A* Simmons A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 6 8 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library• Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED: /// A- APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: ^ 7 ' T.
    [Show full text]
  • Approved: the DIFFUSION of SHELL ORNAMENTS in THE
    The diffusion of shell ornaments in the prehistoric Southwest Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors McFarland, Will-Lola Humphries, 1900- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 10/10/2021 05:59:07 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/553574 THE DIFFUSION OF SHELL ORNAMENTS IN THE PREHISTORIC SOUTH-FEST by V/ill-Lola McFarland A Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Department of Anthropology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts' in the Graduate College University of Arizona 1 9 4 1 Approved: I - 2- C--V/ Director of Thesis ~ Date 4 '-V- - *- l. ACKKO mLKIXjj IrJTT I wish to expro: s appreciation to my cat Liable advioar, Mrs. Clara Lee Tanner, for her inspiration and untiring effort in assisting mo with the preparation of this thesis. I also wish to thank Dr. iSwil ... Haury, head of the Anthropology Department, and Dr. 3d ward W. jplccr for giving nu the benefit of their exper­ ience in their very helpful guidance and suggestions. ;,.L HOF. 1 3 < t b b l TABLE OF CONTENTS CflAPT^£R : . • . ' PACE 32ITRODUCTIOH................... ........... i I. STATUS OF SOXJTHV/NSTCULTURE.. ^ • 1 Gopgraphleal Distribution and General Outline........ .................... 1 Ilohokaa............................. 3 Anasazl............................. 9 Mogollon.......... .................. 16 II. SHELL TYPES AI!D THE EORKINa OF SHELL.
    [Show full text]
  • Steinaker Dam Right Abutment Slide Repair Final Environmental Assessment
    Steinaker Dam Right Abutment Slide Repair Final Environmental Assessment PRO-EA-16-010 Upper Colorado Region Provo Area Office Provo, Utah U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Provo Area Office Provo, Utah January 2017 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior protects and manages the Nation’s natural resources and cultural heritage; provides scientific and other information about those resources; and honors its trust responsibilities or special commitments to American Indians, Alaska Natives, and affiliated island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Steinaker Dam Right Abutment Slide Repair Final Environmental Assessment Upper Colorado Region Provo Area Office Provo, Utah Interdisciplinary Team Leader: Peter L. Crookston 302 East 1860 South Provo, Utah 84606 801-379-1152 [email protected] U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Provo Area Office Provo, Utah January 2017 Contents Page Chapter 1 Purpose of and Need for Proposed Action ...................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background ........................................................................................... 1 1.3 Purpose of and Need for Proposed Action ............................................ 2 1.4 Public Scoping and Involvement
    [Show full text]
  • Social Identity in the Northern San Juan (24-3)
    ARCHAEOLOGY SOUTHWEST CONTINUE ON TO THE NEXT PAGE FOR YOUR magazineFREE PDF (formerly the Center for Desert Archaeology) is a private 501 (c) (3) nonprofit organization that explores and protects the places of our past across the American Southwest and Mexican Northwest. We have developed an integrated, conservation- based approach known as Preservation Archaeology. Although Preservation Archaeology begins with the active protection of archaeological sites, it doesn’t end there. We utilize holistic, low-impact investigation methods in order to pursue big-picture questions about what life was like long ago. As a part of our mission to help foster advocacy and appreciation for the special places of our past, we share our discoveries with the public. This free back issue of Archaeology Southwest Magazine is one of many ways we connect people with the Southwest’s rich past. Enjoy! Not yet a member? Join today! Membership to Archaeology Southwest includes: » A Subscription to our esteemed, quarterly Archaeology Southwest Magazine » Updates from This Month at Archaeology Southwest, our monthly e-newsletter » 25% off purchases of in-print, in-stock publications through our bookstore » Discounted registration fees for Hands-On Archaeology classes and workshops » Free pdf downloads of Archaeology Southwest Magazine, including our current and most recent issues » Access to our on-site research library » Invitations to our annual members’ meeting, as well as other special events and lectures Join us at archaeologysouthwest.org/how-to-help In the meantime, stay informed at our regularly updated Facebook page! 300 N Ash Alley, Tucson AZ, 85701 • (520) 882-6946 • [email protected] • www.archaeologysouthwest.org TM Archaeology Southwest Volume 24, Number 3 Center for Desert Archaeology Summer 2010 Social Identity in the Northern San Juan Paul Reed, Center for Desert Archaeology HE STUDY OF SOCIAL IDENTITY has emerged residents of the area were practicing an Archaic hunt- as an important issue in Southwestern archaeo- ing-and-gathering lifestyle.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Scale of Mesa Verde Anasazi Kivas
    5 Social Scale of Mesa Verde Anasazi Kivas William D. Lipe Pueblo I to III Mesa Verde settlements typically have one protokiva or kiva for each block of six to nine rooms, a pattern indicative ofkiva use by a relatively small and common social segment such as an extended family or minima/lineage. These ordinary small Pueblo I protokivas and Pueblo II and III kivas were probably used for both ritual and domestic activities. Chacoan outliers in the Mesa Verde area have fewer and larger kivas, and a less regular patterning of kivas to room blocks. Kivas at Chacoan sites may have functioned at a larger scale of social integration than at Mesa Verde settlements. At roughly AD.l300, approximately coincident with the abandonment of the Mesa Verde area, most Puebloans shifted from a Mesa Verde-like pattern of many small kivas to one of large plaza-oriented sites with only a few relatively large kivas. Following Steward (1937) and Adams (this volume), this suggests a larger integrative scale for kiva use, and stronger village-level organization. Continuities in kiva architec­ ture and ritual features suggest that aspects of the religious ideology associated with earlier kivas were incorporated into the new organization. Introduction struction of large pueblos around plazas became com­ mon in the Rio Grande through Western Pueblo areas, he model for this paper is Julian Steward's classic although Steward did not discuss this (but see Adams' T 1937 article entitled "Ecological Aspects of South­ comments in Chapter 11, this volume). western Society." In that paper, Steward used the ratio Following Prudden 'sandS teward 's lead, others have of rooms to kivas as a measure of the scale of social pursued similar or related approaches to using architec­ integration in both prehistoric and historic Pueblo com­ tural characteristics and spatial relationships as indica­ munities.
    [Show full text]
  • Idealized Lithic Trajectory 221T563 Trajectory Spatial Interpretation Representation
    Archaeological Report No. 17 THE TCHULA PERIOD IN THE MID-SOUTH AND LOWER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY Proceedings of the 1982 Mid-South Archaeological Conference Edited by David H. Dye Department of Anthropology Memphis State University and Ronald C. Brister Chief, Curator of Collections Memphis Museums Mississippi Department of Archives and History Jackson, Mississippi 1986 MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY Archaeological Report No. 17 Patricia Kay Galloway Series Editor Elbert R. Hilliard Director Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 86-620005 ISBN: 0-938896-48-2 © Copyright 1986 Mississippi Department of Archives and History This volume is dedicated to Philip Phillips, James A. Ford, and James B. Griffin TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Acknowledgments • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• x Introduction David H. Dye ••••••• 1 The Second Mid-South Archaeological Conference Dan F. Morse 9 Chapter 1 Tchula Period Ceramics in the Upper Sunflower Region Samuel O. Brookes and Cheryl Taylor ••••••• 23 2 Alexander, Tchefuncte, and Black Sand: An Early Gulf Tradition in the Mississippi Valley David H. Dye and Jerry R. Galm •• 28 3 The Tchula Period in the Mississippi Valley James B. Griffin 40 4 The Wheeler Series: Space, Time, and External Relationships Ned J. Jenkins 43 5 Tchula/Miller I: A Perspective from Pinson Mounds Robert C. Mainfort, Jr. 52 6 Comment on Geomorphological Implications on the Development of the Late Tchula/Early Marksville Settlement Pattern in the Upper Yazoo Basin, Mississippi Richard A. Marshall ••• 63 7 McCarty (3-Po-467): A Tchula period site near Marked Tree, Arkansas Dan F. Morse . 70 v Chapter Page 8 An Assessment of Archaeological Data for the Tchula Period in Southeastern Arkansas Martha Ann Rolingson and Marvin D.
    [Show full text]
  • 00-ARQUEOLOGIA 43-INDICE.Pmd
    28 ARQUEOLOGÍA 43 enero-abril 2010 Leticia González Arratia* La etapa lítica y las categorías utilizadas en México y Estados Unidos para designar las etapas arqueológicas más antiguas El presente artículo analiza el concepto de etapa lítica y sus subdivisiones (arqueolítico, cenolítico, protoneolítico), que el prehistoriador José Luis Lorenzo introdujo en 1969 como una forma de organizar de manera sistemática los más antiguos materiales arqueológicos de la lítica tallada y pulida, conocidos hasta esa época en México. Dichos materiales abarcan la eta- pa que se inicia con la llegada del hombre antiguo a este territorio (como cazador-recolector), hasta el momento en que las sociedades prehispánicas —con el paso de los milenios y con su conocimiento del territorio— inician el cultivo de sus alimentos. También se incluye el tema de la clasificación y periodización de los materiales líticos de dicha época, según lo exponen los arqueólogos estadounidenses Gordon Willey y Alex Krieger. Finalmente, se lleva a cabo una primera reflexión sobre el uso de la nomenclatura empleada por la arqueología mexicana en el norte de México, misma que se basa en los planteamientos, cronología y nomenclatura aplicada en Texas. Lo anterior constituye un problema, pues al retomar conceptos y cate- gorías de la arqueología estadounidense, se ignora la historia misma del desarrollo de la ar- queología mexicana. Esto se plantea como hipótesis de que dicha situación limita y afecta el desarrollo y originalidad de lo que la arqueología del norte de México pueda estudiar. The article discusses the notion of the Lithic Stage and its subdivisions (Archaeolithic, Ceno- lithic, Protoneolithic) proposed in 1969 by pre-historian José Luis Lorenzo, who introduced it as a means of systematically organizing the most ancient archaeological carved and polished lithic material known up to that time in Mexico.
    [Show full text]