Provided by the Author(S) and University College Dublin Library in Accordance with Publisher Policies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Provided by the Author(S) and University College Dublin Library in Accordance with Publisher Policies Provided by the author(s) and University College Dublin Library in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite the published version when available. Title The significance of the cross-border dimension for promoting peace and reconciliation Authors(s) O'Dowd, Liam; McCall, Cathal Publication date 2006 Conference details þÿPaper presented at the workshop on The Irish border in perspective as part of the Mapping frontiers, plotting pathways: routes to North-South cooperation in a divided island þÿprogramme, Queen s University, Belfast, 1 October 2004 Series IBIS Working Papers; 55; MFPP Working Papers; 5 Publisher University College Dublin. Institute for British-Irish Studies Link to online version http://www.ucd.ie/ibis/filestore/wp2006/55/55_lodcmc.pdf Item record/more information http://hdl.handle.net/10197/2210 Downloaded 2021-09-27T14:35:19Z The UCD community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters! (@ucd_oa) © Some rights reserved. For more information, please see the item record link above. THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE CROSS- BORDER DIMENSION FOR PROMOTING PEACE AND RECONCILIATION Liam O’Dowd and Cathal McCall IBIS working paper no. 55 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE CROSS-BORDER DIMENSION FOR PROMOTING PEACE AND RECONCILIATION Liam O’Dowd and Cathal McCall Working Papers in British-Irish Studies No. 55, 2006 (also printed as MFPP working paper no. 5) Institute for British-Irish Studies University College Dublin IBIS Working Papers No. 55, 2006 (also printed as MFPP working paper no. 5) © the authors, 2006 ISSN 1649-0304 ABSTRACT THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE CROSS-BORDER DIMENSION FOR PROMOTING PEACE AND RECONCILIATION This paper focuses on the significance of the cross-border dimension in promoting peace and reconciliation. Its central argument is that cross-border co-operation can help undermine the territorial “caging” which has been so central to the conflict in Northern Ireland. The paper begins by making the case that borders and border change are integral to conflict and its resolution. Secondly, it traces how the recent re-configuration of cross-border relations has challenged the architecture of “con- tainment” which has both limited and intensified communal conflict in Ireland. Thirdly, it reports on some empirical research into the cross-border co-operation promoted by voluntary sector organisations funded under Peace II. Finally, it draws some tentative conclusions about the importance of transnational cross-border co- operation across the external and internal borders in undermining the territorialist zero-sum conflict which has long characterised Northern Ireland and which now as- sumes its most visible and antagonistic form at the interfaces bordering the two communities within the province. Publication information Paper presented at the workshop on “The Irish border in perspective” as part of the Mapping frontiers, plotting pathways: routes to North-South cooperation in a divided island programme, Queen’s University, Belfast, 1 October 2004. The programme is funded by the Special EU Programmes Body through the Higher Education Authority over the period 2004-06. BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION Liam O’Dowd is Professor of Sociology and Director of the Centre for International Borders Research (CIBR) at Queen’s University, Belfast. Recent publications in- clude Culture and cooperation in Europe’s borderlands [European Studies, 19] (Ro- dopi, 2003); New borders for a changing Europe: cross-border co-operation and governance (Frank Cass, 2003), both co-edited with James Anderson and Tom Wilson, and “The changing significance of European borders”, Regional and federal studies 12 (4) 2002, pp. 13-36. Cathal McCall is Lecturer in European Studies at Queen’s University, Belfast. Re- cent publications include Identity in Northern Ireland: communities, politics and change (Palgrave, 2001), and “Shifting thresholds, contested meanings: govern- ance, cross-border co-operation and the Ulster unionist identity”, European studies: a journal of European culture , history and politics 19, 2003, pp. 81-103. THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE CROSS-BORDER DIMENSION FOR PROMOTING PEACE AND RECONCILIATION Liam O’Dowd and Cathal McCall INTRODUCTION The cross-border dimension has come to be accepted by all sides as part of the framework for resolving the Northern Ireland conflict. In its previous incarnation as the “Irish dimension” it goes back to earlier initiatives in this area. Since the early 1990s at the level of high politics it has become identified with Strand 2 in the peace process and the Good Friday Agreement. From the Anglo-Irish Agreement (1985), it has been strongly supported by the US and the EC/EU. 1 The emphasis has been on promoting cross-border economic cooperation of mutual benefit to the peoples on the island, but also as a potential driver of peace-building and reconciliation. The EU Commission, in conjunction with the British and Irish governments, has gone further by initiating the Peace 1 and Peace II programmes to underpin the paramili- tary ceasefires and the Good Friday Agreement respectively. This has taken the form of multi-level partnerships involving the Commission, government departments on either side of the border, voluntary sector agencies and grassroots community groups in a process designed to build bridges between the two communities in the North and between both and communities in the border counties of the Republic. 2 The Peace programmes have been heavily criticised by participants, sometimes on grounds of sectarian imbalance, more often on the basis of their funding priorities, excessive bureaucracy and effectiveness. Yet, few of those involved question their net benefit. For example, the voluntary sector, all the political parties in Northern Ire- land and the government in the Republic favour a Peace 3 programme. This paper focuses directly on the significance of the cross-border dimension in promoting peace and reconciliation. Its central argument is that cross-border coop- eration can help undermine the territorial “caging” which has been so central to the conflict in Northern Ireland. As such the paper is primarily concerned with the state border while also raising the question of links between it and the internal borders which separate Catholics and Protestants within Northern Ireland. It suggests that the contribution of cross-border cooperation to conflict resolution must not be seen 1 The impact of the EU on promoting cross-border cooperation has received more attention than that of the USA (See for example recent work of Hayward, 2004 and the EU border conflicts research programme). The USA has relied more on supporting private business through the International Fund for Ireland. Comparative studies of EU and US promotion of cross border cooperation suggest that heavy involved of state institutions at all levels characterises European efforts while US sponsored cross-border cooperation (as in across the US-Mexican border for example) is focused on private sector initiatives (Blatter, 2004). 2 The specific raison d’etre of the Peace II programme that has funded the “Mapping Frontiers” project of which this paper forms a part includes “addressing the legacy of the conflict” and “taking opportunities arising from the peace”. Like Peace 1, Peace II has allocated 15% of its total budget to promoting cross-border co- operation. IBIS WORKING PAPER NO. 55 IBIS WORKING PAPERS NO. 55, 2006 in isolation from the building of bridges between both communities in the North. The thrust of the peace process has been to separate two sets of issues, the first to do with North-South (i.e. cross-border) relations, the second to do with cross- communal relationships within Northern Ireland. This separation can be justified pragmatically on a political level and is a major part of the architecture of the peace process and the Good Friday Agreement. This paper argues, however, that the rela- tionship between cooperation across the external and internal borders of Northern Ireland needs to be explored and developed as it is critical to furthering peace and reconciliation. The paper begins by making the case that borders and border change are integral to the conflict and to its resolution. Secondly, it traces how the recent re- configuration of cross-border relations has challenged the architecture of contain- ment which has both limited and intensified communal conflict in Ireland. Thirdly, it reports on some empirical research into transnational cross-border cooperation car- ried out by the voluntary sector and funded under Peace II. Finally, it draws some tentative conclusions about the importance of transnational cross-border coopera- tion in undermining the territorialist zero-sum conflict which has long characterised Northern Ireland and which now assumes its most visible and antagonistic form at the interfaces bordering the two communities within Northern Ireland. STATE BORDERS, BORDER CHANGE AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION A growing international and interdisciplinary literature on borders and border change helps illuminate the connection between state borders, border change and conflict resolution. 3 Ironically, the stimulus for this new interest in borders has been the challenge posed by new forms of economic, political and cultural globalization to ex- isting territorial borders. “Strong” theories of an increasingly “borderless” world have been confronted by the empirical recognition that borders are not so much disap- pearing as being reconfigured in new ways
Recommended publications
  • Copyrighted Material
    Index Note: page numbers in italics denote illustrations or maps Abbey Theatre 175 sovereignty 390 Abbot, Charles 28 as Taoiseach 388–9 abdication crisis 292 and Trimble 379, 409, 414 Aberdeen, Earl of 90 Aiken, Frank abortion debate 404 ceasefire 268–9 Academical Institutions (Ireland) Act 52 foreign policy 318–19 Adams, Gerry and Lemass 313 assassination attempt 396 and Lynch 325 and Collins 425 and McGilligan 304–5 elected 392 neutrality 299 and Hume 387–8, 392, 402–3, 407 reunification 298 and Lynch 425 WWII 349 and Paisley 421 air raids, Belfast 348, 349–50 St Andrews Agreement 421 aircraft industry 347 on Trimble 418 Aldous, Richard 414 Adams, W.F. 82 Alexandra, Queen 174 Aer Lingus 288 Aliens Act 292 Afghan War 114 All for Ireland League 157 Agar-Robartes, T.G. 163 Allen, Kieran 308–9, 313 Agence GénéraleCOPYRIGHTED pour la Défense de la Alliance MATERIAL Party 370, 416 Liberté Religieuse 57 All-Ireland Committee 147, 148 Agricultural Credit Act 280 Allister, Jim 422 agricultural exports 316 Alter, Peter 57 agricultural growth 323 American Civil War 93, 97–8 Agriculture and Technical Instruction, American note affair 300 Dept of 147 American War of Independence 93 Ahern, Bertie 413 Amnesty Association 95, 104–5, 108–9 and Paisley 419–20 Andrews, John 349, 350–1 resignation 412–13, 415 Anglesey, Marquis of 34 separated from wife 424 Anglicanism 4, 65–6, 169 Index 513 Anglo-American war 93 Ashbourne Purchase Act 133, 150 Anglo-Irish Agreement (1938) 294, 295–6 Ashe, Thomas 203 Anglo-Irish Agreement (1985) Ashtown ambush 246 aftermath
    [Show full text]
  • The European Community and the Relationships Between Northern Ireland and the Irish Republic: a Test of Neo-Functionalism
    Tresspassing on Borders? The European Community and the Relationships between Northern Ireland and the Irish Republic: A Test of Neo-functionalism Etain Tannam Department of Government London School of Economics and Political Science Ph.D. thesis UMI Number: U062758 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U062758 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 or * tawmjn 7/atA K<2lt&8f4&o ii Contents List of Figures v Acknowledgements vi 1. The European Community and the Irish/Northern Irish Cross- 1 border Relationship: Theoretical Framework Introduction 2 1. The Irish/Northern Irish Cross-border Relationship: A Critical 5 Test of Neo-functionalism ii. Co-operation and The Northern Irish/Irish Cross-Border 15 Relationship iii. The Irish/Northern Irish Cross-border Relationship and the 21 Anglo-Irish Agreement iv. The Anglo-Irish Agreement and International Relations Theory 25 Conclusion: The Irish Cross-border Relationship and International 30 Relations Theory: Hypotheses 2. A History ofThe Cross-Border Political Relationship 34 Introduction 35 i. Partition and the Boundary Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Engagement: Irish Republicanism, Memory Politics
    Critical Engagement Critical Engagement Irish republicanism, memory politics and policing Kevin Hearty LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY PRESS First published 2017 by Liverpool University Press 4 Cambridge Street Liverpool L69 7ZU Copyright © 2017 Kevin Hearty The right of Kevin Hearty to be identified as the author of this book has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication data A British Library CIP record is available print ISBN 978-1-78694-047-6 epdf ISBN 978-1-78694-828-1 Typeset by Carnegie Book Production, Lancaster Contents Acknowledgements vii List of Figures and Tables x List of Abbreviations xi Introduction 1 1 Understanding a Fraught Historical Relationship 25 2 Irish Republican Memory as Counter-Memory 55 3 Ideology and Policing 87 4 The Patriot Dead 121 5 Transition, ‘Never Again’ and ‘Moving On’ 149 6 The PSNI and ‘Community Policing’ 183 7 The PSNI and ‘Political Policing’ 217 Conclusion 249 References 263 Index 303 Acknowledgements Acknowledgements This book has evolved from my PhD thesis that was undertaken at the Transitional Justice Institute, University of Ulster (TJI). When I moved to the University of Warwick in early 2015 as a post-doc, my plans to develop the book came with me too. It represents the culmination of approximately five years of research, reading and (re)writing, during which I often found the mere thought of re-reading some of my work again nauseating; yet, with the encour- agement of many others, I persevered.
    [Show full text]
  • TRADE UNIONISM and SECTARIANISM A1'k)NG DERRY SHIRT WORKERS 1920-1968 with Special Reference to the National Union of Tailors and Garment Workers
    TRADE UNIONISM AND SECTARIANISM A1'K)NG DERRY SHIRT WORKERS 1920-1968 With Special Reference to the National Union of Tailors and Garment Workers A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Science, University of London. by Andrew Robert Finlay Department of Anthropology University College London 1989 BIRL LONDIN. UNIV. -1•- ABSTRACT The problem at the heart of this study is: to what extent and in what ways was the development of trade unionism in the Derry shirt industry influenced by sectarianism? This problem and my approach to it were elaborated in contradistinction to existing theories of trade unionism in Northern Ireland. According to the main theory, developed most cogently within traditional Irish marxism, trade unionism was thwarted by sectarianism. I suggest that this theory has more to do with the reductionist and evolutionist assumptions of its authors than with social reality and argue that the relationship between trade unionism and sectarianism Is better understood with an approach in which it is recognised that both of these institutions are constituted through the actions of concrete individuals who are themselves consituted by society, and in which priority is given to the meanings which individuals ascribe to their actions and predicaments. My- study is based on interviews with a sample of retired union officials and activists. My respondants were keenly aware of the Catholic-Protestant dichotomy, but, contrary to what traditional Irish marxists would lead one to expect, they did not regard sectarianism as a significant problem until the 1950s, My analysis of union growth and structure 1920-1952 largely confirmed this view: union densities compared favourably with clothing workers in Britain, and the main factors underlying fluctuations in membership were more or less the same as elsewhere in Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • “A Peace of Sorts”: a Cultural History of the Belfast Agreement, 1998 to 2007 Eamonn Mcnamara
    “A Peace of Sorts”: A Cultural History of the Belfast Agreement, 1998 to 2007 Eamonn McNamara A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Philosophy, Australian National University, March 2017 Declaration ii Acknowledgements I would first like to thank Professor Nicholas Brown who agreed to supervise me back in October 2014. Your generosity, insight, patience and hard work have made this thesis what it is. I would also like to thank Dr Ben Mercer, your helpful and perceptive insights not only contributed enormously to my thesis, but helped fund my research by hiring and mentoring me as a tutor. Thank you to Emeritus Professor Elizabeth Malcolm whose knowledge and experience thoroughly enhanced this thesis. I could not have asked for a better panel. I would also like to thank the academic and administrative staff of the ANU’s School of History for their encouragement and support, in Monday afternoon tea, seminars throughout my candidature and especially useful feedback during my Thesis Proposal and Pre-Submission Presentations. I would like to thank the McClay Library at Queen’s University Belfast for allowing me access to their collections and the generous staff of the Linen Hall Library, Belfast City Library and Belfast’s Newspaper Library for all their help. Also thanks to my local libraries, the NLA and the ANU’s Chifley and Menzies libraries. A big thank you to Niamh Baker of the BBC Archives in Belfast for allowing me access to the collection. I would also like to acknowledge Bertie Ahern, Seán Neeson and John Lindsay for their insightful interviews and conversations that added a personal dimension to this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Peace in Northern Ireland Miracle (Almost) Achieved? CONTRIBUTORS
    British Politics Review Journal of the British Politics Society, Norway Volume 11 | No. 2 | Spring 2016 Peace in Northern Ireland Miracle (almost) achieved? CONTRIBUTORS Sophie Whiting • Peter McLoughlin • Fearghal McGarry • Arthur Aughey Eamonn O’Kane • Anne-Marie Forker • Kate Fearon • Jan Erik Mustad British Politics Review Editorial Volume 11 | No. 2 | Spring 2016 ISSN 1890-4505 “The War is over” is a phrase which has sometimes been used to describe the state of British Politics Review Northern Ireland, 10 years after St Andrews Northernof a new eraIreland in Northern after the BelfastIreland. (“Good With mostFriday”) political Agreement groups of now 1998 committed – the famous to With contributionsis a quarterly breakthrough in the so-called “peace process” which seemed to spell the beginnings journalfrom academic issued byand the journalistic British Politics sour Society, BritishNorway. Politics Review is aimed pursuing their political objectives by peaceful means only, it was finally possible to - set up institutions of self-government for Northern Ireland, based on that principle ces,political the developments in Britain. of “power sharing” which had first been put forward during the most intense phase at everyone with a general interest in of the “Troubles” in 1973. British Politics Society, Norway Yet the immediate years after1998 were difficult ones, marked by problems related lective agenda apart from raising the to the “decommissioning” of paramilitary arms, and repeated suspensions of the is politically neutral and has no col- devolved institutions. Following an incident known as “Stormontgate” in 2002 (which politics among the informed Norwe involved the discovery of an alleged IRA spy ring inside Stormont), direct rule from interestgian public.
    [Show full text]
  • Troy D. Davis Curriculum Vitae
    Troy D. Davis Curriculum Vitae Professor and Chair Department of History Stephen F. Austin State University Nacogdoches, Texas 75962 (936) 468-3802 E-mail: [email protected] Education: Doctor of Philosophy in Modern European History, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Emphasis: Irish History. Degree awarded December 1992. Degree required demonstration of competency in five fields through written and oral examinations, plus dissertation. Passed examinations in April 1990. Five fields were: Modern Europe, 1648-1815; Modern Europe, 1815-1919; Modern Europe, 1919-present; United States, 1900-present; and European intellectual history, 1648-present. Dissertation topic: Irish-American diplomacy, 1945-52. Defended dissertation November 24, 1992. One year of graduate study in history at Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland, October 1986-May 1987. Attended classes on Irish history and politics. Performed independent research relevant to dissertation. Master of Arts in Modern European History, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Degree awarded May 1986. Degree required demonstration of competency in four fields through written and oral examinations, plus masters essay. Four fields were: Modern Europe, 1815-1919; Modern Europe, 1919- present; United States, 1900-present; and Historical Methods. Masters essay topic: The Blueshirt movement in Ireland in the 1930s. Bachelor of Arts in History, Texas Christian University, Ft. Worth, Texas. Degree awarded summa cum laude, with University and Departmental Honors in May 1984. Teaching Experience:
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Ireland Assembly (Elections and Periods of Suspension) Bill Had Its First Reading on 8 May 2003, and Its Remaining Stages Are Scheduled for 12 May 2003
    RESEARCH PAPER 03/43 The Northern Ireland 9MAY 2003 Assembly (Elections and Periods of Suspension) Bill Bill 104 of 2002-03 The Northern Ireland Assembly (Elections and Periods of Suspension) Bill had its First Reading on 8 May 2003, and its remaining stages are scheduled for 12 May 2003. Elections to the Northern Ireland Assembly were due to take place on 29 May 2003, having been put back from 1 May 2003 by the Northern Ireland Assembly Elections Act 2003 in March 2003. This was discussed in Research Paper 03/21, The Northern Ireland Assembly Elections Bill, 13 March 2003. On 1 May 2003 the British Government announced that it would postpone the elections until the autumn. The British and Irish Governments had been preparing to publish a Joint Declaration on moves towards full implementation of the Belfast Agreement, but they were not satisfied with the undertakings the IRA was prepared to give on meeting its obligations under the Agreement. The British Government argued that the outstanding issues over the IRA position could not be resolved during an election campaign, and so decided on a further postponement. The Irish Government did not support it on this point. This paper gives an account of the main features of the Bill, the British Government’s rationale for postponement, the main reactions to it, and some background. Paul Bowers, Vaughne Miller, Chris Sear PARLIAMENT AND CONSTITUTION CENTRE HOUSE OF COMMONS LIBRARY RESEARCH PAPER 03/43 Recent Library Research Papers include: 03/28 Ballistic Missile Defence 26.03.03 03/29 The Sustainable
    [Show full text]
  • A Catalogue of the Eamon Donnelly Collection
    A Catalogue of the Éamon Donnelly Collection at Newry and Mourne Museum Robert Whan A personal perspective by one of Éamon Donnelly’s grandchildren On the last Friday of 1944, my day along with Major Vivion de Valera grandfather, Éamon Donnelly, who representing his father. A year later was a native of County Armagh and a a striking memorial was unveiled at prominent Irish Nationalist politician, his grave with the inscription “to a died at the age of 67 in a Dublin true friend and sterling patriot”. It is nursing home. A Requiem Mass was still there at his grave; a huge block of celebrated at St Andrew’s Church in white granite (now dulled by age and the City on 30th December, attended weather) with a bas-relief of Éamon on by Éamon de Valera, then Taoiseach the front. of the Irish Republic and other leading members of the Irish government. Since then, apart from the very Éamon’s remains were taken through occasional pilgrimage to his grave the streets of Dublin to Amiens Street and memorial by politicians and (now Connolly) Station for the train historians, Éamon Donnelly has been journey to Newry, County Down, largely forgotten. where he had spent much of his life, for burial. I came to Newry in about 1956 when my mother, Nell, the eldest of Éamon In Newry, one of the largest crowds and Marianne Donnelly’s six children ever seen in the town lined the route and by then a relatively young widow, to St. Mary’s Cemetery where Éamon returned to the town that had been her was buried with his wife, Marianne, family home years before.
    [Show full text]
  • Conor Cruise O'brien and Northern
    Irish Historical Studies (2021), 45 (167), 101–121. © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Irish Historical Studies Publications Ltd. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. doi:10.1017/ihs.2021.23 ‘I was altogether out of tune with my colleagues’: Conor Cruise O’Brien and Northern Ireland, 1969–77 STEPHEN KELLY* Liverpool Hope University ABSTRACT. This article critically re-assesses Conor Cruise O’Brien’s attitude to Northern Ireland between 1969 and 1977. It argues that O’Brien’s most significant contribution to public life was the ability to deconstruct many aspects of Irish nationalism, specifically his rejection of the Irish state’s irredentist claim over Northern Ireland. In doing so, it contends that O’Brien was one of the most important, and outspoken, champions of so-called ‘revisionist nationalism’ of his generation. The article examines three themes in relation to O’Brien’s attitude to Northern Ireland: his attack on the Irish state’s anti-partitionism; his rejection of Irish republican terrorism; and his support for the ‘principle of consent’ argument. The article illustrates that O’Brien was criticised in nationalist circles and accused of committing political heresy. Indeed, his willingness to challenge the attitude of most mainstream Irish politicians on Northern Ireland invariably left him an isolated figure, even among his own Labour Party comrades. Writing in his Memoir, O’Brien neatly summed up the difficult position in which he found himself: ‘I was altogether out of tune with my colleagues over Northern Ireland’.
    [Show full text]
  • Seanad E´Ireann
    Vol. 182 Thursday, No. 13 2 February 2006 DI´OSPO´ IREACHTAI´ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES SEANAD E´ IREANN TUAIRISC OIFIGIU´ IL—Neamhcheartaithe (OFFICIAL REPORT—Unrevised) Thursday, 2 February 2006. Business of Seanad ………………………………985 Order of Business …………………………………986 Visit of Hungarian Delegation ……………………………995 Order of Business (resumed)……………………………996 Companies (Auditing and Accounting) Act 2003 (Prescribed Accountancy Bodies) Regulations 2006: Motion 1000 Northern Ireland Issues: Statements …………………………1001 Adjournment Matters: Job Losses …………………………………1034 Nursing Home Services ……………………………1036 Burial Facilities ………………………………1038 985 986 SEANAD E´ IREANN no new businesses have been brought to the new IDA centre in Carlow town and when he ———— expects a decision on same. I regard the matters raised by the Senators as De´ardaoin, 2 Feabhra 2006. suitable for discussion on the Adjournment. I Thursday, 2 February 2006. have selected the matters raised by Senators Mansergh, Moylan and Coghlan and they will be ———— taken at the conclusion of business. Senators Chuaigh an Cathaoirleach i gceannas ar Feighan and Browne may give notice on another 10.35 a.m. day of the matter they wish to raise. Before calling the Leader of the House, I point ———— out that the time for the Order of Business has been extended to 40 minutes. However, yester- Paidir. day’s Order of Business took 50 minutes, which Prayer. is ten minutes longer. I do not like to be put in the position of being required to exclude Senators ———— who wish to speak on the Order of Business when the time is up. I appeal for a little co-operation in Business of Seanad. this regard.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic and Social Research Institute
    The Economic and Social Research Institute ATTITUDES IN THE REPUBLIC OF IRELAND RELEVANT TO THE NORTHERN IRELAND PROBLEM’ VOL. I Descriptive Analysis and Some Comparisons with Attitudes in Northern Ireland and Great Britain E. E. DAVIS and R. SINNOTT Paper N o. 97 September, 1979 THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE COUNCIL a978-1979 ~:T. K. WHITAKER, M.SC. (E~ON.), D.ECON.SC., LL.D., President of the Institute. *J. F. MEENAN, M.A., B.L., Chairman of the Council. R.D.C. BLACK, PH.D., Professor, Department of Economics, The Queen’s University, Belfast. F. B. CHUB B, M.A., D. PH I L., Professor, Department of Political Science, Trinity College, Dublin. SEAN CROMIEN, B.A., Second Secretary, Department of Finance. G. DEAN, M.D., F.R.C.P., Director, Medico-Social Research Board. N.J. GIBSON, B.SC. (ECON.), PH.D., Professor, Department of Economics, The New University oAr Ulstel; Coleraine. PATRICK A. HALL, B.E., M.S., DIP.STAT., Director of Research, Institute of Public Administration. *W. A. HONOHAN, M.A., F.I.A. TIIE MOST REV..]AMES KAVANAGH, M.A., S.T.L., Bishop of Zerta. :’~KIERAN A. KENNEDY, M.ECON.SC., B.PHIL., PH.D., Director of the hzstilute. IVOR KENNY, M.A., Director General, Irish Management Institute. MICHAEL J. KILLEEN, B.A. (MOD.), B.COMM., D.P.A., Managing Director, Industrial Development Authority. T. P. LINEHAN, B.E., B.SC., Director, Central Statistics Office. ’~P. LYNCH, M.A., M.R.I.A., Professor of Political Economy, University College, Dublin. CHARLES MCCARTHY, B.L., Chairman, Human Sciences Committee.
    [Show full text]