DOCSLIB.ORG

Deep Homology --- Mutualisms !! and the Origins of Evolutionary Novelty

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Deep Homology --- Mutualisms !! and the Origins of Evolutionary Novelty 1/25/2019 Pathway Discovery in Deep Convergence “Repeated convergent evolution in Big Data in Phylogenomics for Nitrogen- phenotypic traits can be traced back to Fixing Root Nodule Symbiosis convergence at the genome level” Shifeng CHENG Agricultural Genomics Institute, CAAS; (BGI-Shenzhen) Do new anatomical structures arise de novo, or do [email protected]，January 15, PAG XVVII they evolve from pre-existing structures? Host-microbe symbiosis is a crucial trait for life growth and development Parasitic ? or Symbiotic? Homology means common ancestor ! Each Plant or Animal has its “second genome” !! Deep Homology --- mutualisms !! and the origins of evolutionary novelty Animals: Plants: For Plants, ① Bats/Dolphins echolocation ① Flowering/leaves ② Electric organs in diverse fishes ② Photosynthesis One of the symbioses Legume-rhizobia is ③ Animal eyes/photoreceptors ③ AM-fungi symbiosis is…. one of the important ④ Tetrapod limbs/fish fins ⑤ Giant beetle horns symbioses for plants Hox-gene $100 billion economic & environmental cost, globally 1 1/25/2019 Families (order) # genus # genus # Species/in Chiina ① typical legume nodule World China ② Evolutionary symbiosis 远志科Polygalaceae (豆目Fabales) 17 4 950/47 19 families: between land plants and 皂皮树科Quillajaceae (豆目Fabales) 4 0 44/0 Microbes:Arbuscular 海人树科Surianaceae (豆目Fabales) 5 1 7/1 close-related Mycorrhizal (AM) & 胡桃科Juglandaceae (壳斗目Fagales) 9 7 59/21 Root Nodule Symbiosis 核果木科Ticodendraceae (壳斗目Fagales) 1 0 1/0 non-nodulators (RNS) 壳斗科Fagaceae (壳斗目Fagales) 7 7 700/294 马尾树科Rhoipteleaceae (壳斗目Fagales) 1 1 1/1 Conserved: 南青冈科Nothofagaceae (壳斗目Fagales) 1 0 35/0 RNS symbiosis shares a 钩毛树科Barbeyaceae (蔷薇目Rosales) 1 0 1/0 lot of conserved genetic 桑科Moraceae (蔷薇目Rosales) 37 9 1100/126 荨麻科Urticaceae (蔷薇目Rosales) 45 25 1000/339 toolkit with AM-fungi 朴科Celtidaceae (蔷薇目Rosales) 1 1 70/11 symbiosis 大麻科Cannabaceae (蔷薇目Rosales) 3 3 3/3 伞树科Cecropiaceae (蔷薇目Rosales) 6 1 180/2 八瓣果科Dirachmaceae (蔷薇目Rosales) 1 0 1/0 葫芦科Cucurbitaceae (葫芦目Cucurbitales) 110 30 775/149 秋海棠科Begoniaceae (葫芦目Cucurbitales) 3 1 900/124 棒果木科Corynocarpaceae (葫芦目 1 0 4/0 Wu et. al, 2006 Cucurbitales) 异叶木科Anisophyllaceae (葫芦目 4 0 29/0 Martin et al., 2015 Cucurbitales) 总计： 259 90 4872/1109 (豆科) 10 families: nodulators 19 families: close relatives (蔷薇科) N - fixing clade fixing (桦木科) “2016, Multiple Gains Hypothesis” (壳斗科) (i) Independent gains with parallel evolution (葫芦科) (ii) a single gain of nodulation followed by massive losses (Doyle,1998; Sprent, 2007) The later is much more reasonable? Family (order) # Genus/N- Distribution in #species/in China fixing genus China In the past 20+ years: Evolutionary trajectory, genomic evidence… Symbiosis with Rhizobium 10 families: 1995, Predisposition hypothesis (PNAS) 2014, Predisposition/precursor Event revisit (Nature Communication) 豆科Fabaceae (豆目Fabales) 634/most 152 17275/1432 N-fixing 榆科Ulmaceae (蔷薇目Rosales) 14/1 7 100/33 nodulators Summary： 648 159 17375/1465 Symbiosis with Frankia 桦木科Betulaceae (壳斗目Fagales) 6/1 6 110/89 木麻黄科Casuarinaceae (壳斗目Fagales) 4/4 1（intr.） 96/3 杨梅科Myricaceae (壳斗目Fagales) 3/2 1 59/4 胡颓子科Elaeagnaceae (蔷薇目Rosales) 3/3 2 60/58 鼠李科Rhamnaceae (蔷薇目Rosales) 49/7 15 875/127 What are the 蔷薇科Rosaceae (蔷薇目Rosales) 95/5 62 2825/886 Genetic Innovations & 四数木科Datiscaceae (葫芦目Cucurbitales) 3/1 1 4/1 Genomic Modification 马桑科Coriariaceae (葫芦目Cucurbitales) 1/1 1 5/5 that drives nodulatino? Summary： 164/24 89 4033/1172 Wu et. al, 2006 Jeff et al., 2011 In total： 812 248 21408/2637 2 1/25/2019 The “Evolution of Nodulation” Project, 2015 May --- What we found: NIN and NPG are both present in all Nodulators, but absence in all Non-nodulators Shifeng Cheng, Pierre-marc Deulax, Martin Parniske, Gane Ka-shu wong, et al., --- Co-elimination evolution for the Non-nodulators? To uunderstand genome evolution and diversification of plant-microbe symbioses that are responsible for N- fixing Root Nodule Symbiosis Question: What cause the present-day phylogenetic distribution of plant- (Rosid I) Rhizobia/Frankia Root Nodule symbiosis ? -- a global-scale phylogenomics study Supported by: synteny and PCR Independent NIN mutation events: Deletions monophyletic group, nitrogen-fixing clade: Truncations Fabales, Fagales, Cucurbitales, Rosales NIN: NODULE INCEPTION transcription factor that is essential for nodule formation in legumes. Indel mutation RPG: RHIZOBIUM-DIRECTED POLAR GROWTH, a long coiled-coil protein that is essential for rhizobial infection in No gene erosion legumes. Different to loss of AM 37 Genomes: Fagales: 3 Cucurbitales: 4 Rosales: 8 Fabales: 13 Outgroups: 9 A Novel Evolutionary Scenario for the evolution of NFN clade: what cause the present-day phylogenetic distribution of plant-Rhizobia/Frankia Root Nodule symbiosis ? “Multiple Losses Hypothesis” 7 losses in Fagales, 5 in Cucurbitales, 17 in Rosales, and 36 in Fabales “Drop it is a relieve” Ortholog inference Why lost? The root nodule symbiosis is under negative selection ! Genome-wide approach Phylogenomics Possible drivers: Orthofinder ① energetic balance Target approach ② Cheaters: ‘cheating’ bacteria 21-symbiosis gene families (phylogeny) ③ Environmental factors: Climate changes with decreased CO2 3 1/25/2019 “Pathway Discovery”? Big Omics: 97% of the genome “dark more details, matter”, non-coding sequences through more questions await… multi-omics research, Chip-seq, Methylation, Y2H Novelty and Homology Big Evolution: 28 sequenced genomes vs. 40,000 species in genetic regulatory cascade/circuits NFN clade . Co-option/rewiring and deployment Interactomics: complementary metabolic pathway, soil microbtiota It is not possible to identify what is new in evolution without understanding the old “Man still bears in his bodily frame the indelible stamp of his lowly origin.” PACEs to be found? (Matin Parniske) PACE in the NIN promoter(Predisposition Associated Cis-Element) More missing genes/elements in non-nodulating plants? What happened in non-coding RNAs, promoters, regulators, and genetic network Genetic mechanism underlying the generality and specification of plant-microbiome Symbiotic Host Range; • Jeff: “Understanding predisposition towards nodulation is something of such a ‘holy grail’ ” Laboratoire de Recherche en Acknowledgement • Chasing Unicorns: Engineering Nodulation in Non-nodulators Sciences Végétales (LRSV), CNRS Pierre-marc Delaux NFN clade LMU Munich: “EvoNod Team” Martin Parniske Maximilian Griesmann Cucurbitale: melon, vegetable Rosales: fruits Fabales: beans, medicinal plants Big Evolution: Trait Revisit with Phylogenomics Fagales: trees, shrubs of forest University of Alberta: Big Omics: Pathway Discovery Gane Ka-shu Wong Big Engineering: Pathway recruitment & invention Cereals BGI-Shenzhen: Huanming Yang, Xun Xu Evolution: Deep homology Xin Liu Omics: DNA central dogma Yue Chang Yue Song, et al. Engineering: Genome-aided CRISPR/synthetic biology Grasses: >70% of foods consumed Phylogeny tree mind Genome mind Phylogenomics From Darwin, 1859 We need a Deep Map (of Genomes) Thanks map genes/pathways to the tree 4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Supplemental Information.Pdf
    SUPPORTING INFORMATION Analysis of 41 plant genomes supports a wave of successful genome duplications in association with the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary Kevin Vanneste1,2, Guy Baele3, Steven Maere1,2,*, and Yves Van de Peer1,2,4,* 1 Department of Plant Systems Biology, VIB, Ghent, Belgium 2 Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium 3 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium 4 Department of Genetics, Genomics Research Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa *Corresponding authors Yves Van de Peer Steven Maere VIB / Ghent University VIB / Ghent University Technologiepark 927 Technologiepark 927 Gent (9052), Belgium Gent (9052), Belgium Tel: +32 (0)9 331 3807 Tel: +32 (0)9 331 3805 Fax: +32 (0)9 331 3809 Fax: +32 (0)9 331 3809 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Overview Species grouping topology ................................................ 3 Calibrations and constraints .............................................. 5 Alternative calibrations and constraints ............................ 13 Relative rate tests ............................................................. 27 Re-dating the Pyrus bretschneideri WGD ......................... 30 WGD age estimates from literature ................................... 33 Eschscholzia californica and Acorus americanus ............. 34 2 Species grouping topology In order to date the node joining the homeologous pair, orthogroups were constructed consisting of both homeologs and orthologs from other plant species for which full genome sequence information was available. Different plant species were grouped into ‘species groups’ for which one ortholog was selected and added to the orthogroup, in order to keep the orthogroup topology fixed and to facilitate automation on the one hand, but also to allow enough orthogroups to be constructed on the other hand (see Material and methods).
    [Show full text]
  • Alphabetical Lists of the Vascular Plant Families with Their Phylogenetic
    Colligo 2 (1) : 3-10 BOTANIQUE Alphabetical lists of the vascular plant families with their phylogenetic classification numbers Listes alphabétiques des familles de plantes vasculaires avec leurs numéros de classement phylogénétique FRÉDÉRIC DANET* *Mairie de Lyon, Espaces verts, Jardin botanique, Herbier, 69205 Lyon cedex 01, France - [email protected] Citation : Danet F., 2019. Alphabetical lists of the vascular plant families with their phylogenetic classification numbers. Colligo, 2(1) : 3- 10. https://perma.cc/2WFD-A2A7 KEY-WORDS Angiosperms family arrangement Summary: This paper provides, for herbarium cura- Gymnosperms Classification tors, the alphabetical lists of the recognized families Pteridophytes APG system in pteridophytes, gymnosperms and angiosperms Ferns PPG system with their phylogenetic classification numbers. Lycophytes phylogeny Herbarium MOTS-CLÉS Angiospermes rangement des familles Résumé : Cet article produit, pour les conservateurs Gymnospermes Classification d’herbier, les listes alphabétiques des familles recon- Ptéridophytes système APG nues pour les ptéridophytes, les gymnospermes et Fougères système PPG les angiospermes avec leurs numéros de classement Lycophytes phylogénie phylogénétique. Herbier Introduction These alphabetical lists have been established for the systems of A.-L de Jussieu, A.-P. de Can- The organization of herbarium collections con- dolle, Bentham & Hooker, etc. that are still used sists in arranging the specimens logically to in the management of historical herbaria find and reclassify them easily in the appro- whose original classification is voluntarily pre- priate storage units. In the vascular plant col- served. lections, commonly used methods are systema- Recent classification systems based on molecu- tic classification, alphabetical classification, or lar phylogenies have developed, and herbaria combinations of both.
    [Show full text]
  • Hodin2013 Ch19.Pdf
    736 Part 4 The History of Life How are developmental biology and evolution related? Developmental biol- ogy is the study of the processes by which an organism grows from zygote to reproductive adult. Evolutionary biology is the study of changes in populations across generations. As with non-shattering cereals, evolutionary changes in form and function are rooted in corresponding changes in development. While evo- lutionary biologists are concerned with why such changes occur, developmental biology tells us how these changes happen. Darwin recognized that for a com- plete understanding of evolution, one needs to take account of both the “why” and the “how,” and hence, of the “important subject” of developmental biology. In Darwin’s day, studies of development went hand in hand with evolution, as when Alexander Kowalevsky (1866) first described the larval stage of the sea squirt as having clear chordate affinities, something that is far less clear when examining their adults. Darwin himself (1851a,b; 1854a,b) undertook extensive studies of barnacles, inspired in part by Burmeister’s description (1834) of their larval and metamorphic stages as allying them with the arthropods rather than the mollusks. If the intimate connection between development and evolution was so clear to Darwin and others 150 years ago, why is evolutionary developmental biology (or evo-devo) even considered a separate subject, and not completely inte- grated into the study of evolution? The answer seems to be historical. Although Darwin recognized the importance of development in understanding evolution, development was largely ignored by the architects of the 20th-century codifica- tion of evolutionary biology known as the modern evolutionary synthesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary History of Floral Key Innovations in Angiosperms Elisabeth Reyes
    Evolutionary history of floral key innovations in angiosperms Elisabeth Reyes To cite this version: Elisabeth Reyes. Evolutionary history of floral key innovations in angiosperms. Botanics. Université Paris Saclay (COmUE), 2016. English. NNT : 2016SACLS489. tel-01443353 HAL Id: tel-01443353 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01443353 Submitted on 23 Jan 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. NNT : 2016SACLS489 THESE DE DOCTORAT DE L’UNIVERSITE PARIS-SACLAY, préparée à l’Université Paris-Sud ÉCOLE DOCTORALE N° 567 Sciences du Végétal : du Gène à l’Ecosystème Spécialité de Doctorat : Biologie Par Mme Elisabeth Reyes Evolutionary history of floral key innovations in angiosperms Thèse présentée et soutenue à Orsay, le 13 décembre 2016 : Composition du Jury : M. Ronse de Craene, Louis Directeur de recherche aux Jardins Rapporteur Botaniques Royaux d’Édimbourg M. Forest, Félix Directeur de recherche aux Jardins Rapporteur Botaniques Royaux de Kew Mme. Damerval, Catherine Directrice de recherche au Moulon Président du jury M. Lowry, Porter Curateur en chef aux Jardins Examinateur Botaniques du Missouri M. Haevermans, Thomas Maître de conférences au MNHN Examinateur Mme. Nadot, Sophie Professeur à l’Université Paris-Sud Directeur de thèse M.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Wisconsin Rosids
    Diversity of Wisconsin Rosids . oaks, birches, evening primroses . a major group of the woody plants (trees/shrubs) present at your sites The Wind Pollinated Trees • Alternate leaved tree families • Wind pollinated with ament/catkin inflorescences • Nut fruits = 1 seeded, unilocular, indehiscent (example - acorn) *Juglandaceae - walnut family Well known family containing walnuts, hickories, and pecans Only 7 genera and ca. 50 species worldwide, with only 2 genera and 4 species in Wisconsin Carya ovata Juglans cinera shagbark hickory Butternut, white walnut *Juglandaceae - walnut family Leaves pinnately compound, alternate (walnuts have smallest leaflets at tip) Leaves often aromatic from resinous peltate glands; allelopathic to other plants Carya ovata Juglans cinera shagbark hickory Butternut, white walnut *Juglandaceae - walnut family The chambered pith in center of young stems in Juglans (walnuts) separates it from un- chambered pith in Carya (hickories) Juglans regia English walnut *Juglandaceae - walnut family Trees are monoecious Wind pollinated Female flower Male inflorescence Juglans nigra Black walnut *Juglandaceae - walnut family Male flowers apetalous and arranged in pendulous (drooping) catkins or aments on last year’s woody growth Calyx small; each flower with a bract CA 3-6 CO 0 A 3-∞ G 0 Juglans cinera Butternut, white walnut *Juglandaceae - walnut family Female flowers apetalous and terminal Calyx cup-shaped and persistant; 2 stigma feathery; bracted CA (4) CO 0 A 0 G (2-3) Juglans cinera Juglans nigra Butternut, white
    [Show full text]
  • Full of Beans: a Study on the Alignment of Two Flowering Plants Classification Systems
    Full of beans: a study on the alignment of two flowering plants classification systems Yi-Yun Cheng and Bertram Ludäscher School of Information Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA {yiyunyc2,ludaesch}@illinois.edu Abstract. Advancements in technologies such as DNA analysis have given rise to new ways in organizing organisms in biodiversity classification systems. In this paper, we examine the feasibility of aligning two classification systems for flowering plants using a logic-based, Region Connection Calculus (RCC-5) ap- proach. The older “Cronquist system” (1981) classifies plants using their mor- phological features, while the more recent Angiosperm Phylogeny Group IV (APG IV) (2016) system classifies based on many new methods including ge- nome-level analysis. In our approach, we align pairwise concepts X and Y from two taxonomies using five basic set relations: congruence (X=Y), inclusion (X>Y), inverse inclusion (X<Y), overlap (X><Y), and disjointness (X!Y). With some of the RCC-5 relationships among the Fabaceae family (beans family) and the Sapindaceae family (maple family) uncertain, we anticipate that the merging of the two classification systems will lead to numerous merged solutions, so- called possible worlds. Our research demonstrates how logic-based alignment with ambiguities can lead to multiple merged solutions, which would not have been feasible when aligning taxonomies, classifications, or other knowledge or- ganization systems (KOS) manually. We believe that this work can introduce a novel approach for aligning KOS, where merged possible worlds can serve as a minimum viable product for engaging domain experts in the loop. Keywords: taxonomy alignment, KOS alignment, interoperability 1 Introduction With the advent of large-scale technologies and datasets, it has become increasingly difficult to organize information using a stable unitary classification scheme over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Homology and Multiple-Sequence Alignment: an Analysis of Concepts and Practice
    CSIRO PUBLISHING Australian Systematic Botany, 2015, 28,46–62 LAS Johnson Review http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/SB15001 Molecular homology and multiple-sequence alignment: an analysis of concepts and practice David A. Morrison A,D, Matthew J. Morgan B and Scot A. Kelchner C ASystematic Biology, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18D, Uppsala 75236, Sweden. BCSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. CDepartment of Biology, Utah State University, 5305 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322-5305, USA. DCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. Sequence alignment is just as much a part of phylogenetics as is tree building, although it is often viewed solely as a necessary tool to construct trees. However, alignment for the purpose of phylogenetic inference is primarily about homology, as it is the procedure that expresses homology relationships among the characters, rather than the historical relationships of the taxa. Molecular homology is rather vaguely defined and understood, despite its importance in the molecular age. Indeed, homology has rarely been evaluated with respect to nucleotide sequence alignments, in spite of the fact that nucleotides are the only data that directly represent genotype. All other molecular data represent phenotype, just as do morphology and anatomy. Thus, efforts to improve sequence alignment for phylogenetic purposes should involve a more refined use of the homology concept at a molecular level. To this end, we present examples of molecular-data levels at which homology might be considered, and arrange them in a hierarchy. The concept that we propose has many levels, which link directly to the developmental and morphological components of homology.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Homology and Multiple-Sequence Alignment: an Analysis of Concepts and Practice
    CSIRO PUBLISHING Australian Systematic Botany, 2015, 28, 46–62 LAS Johnson Review http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/SB15001 Molecular homology and multiple-sequence alignment: an analysis of concepts and practice David A. Morrison A,D, Matthew J. Morgan B and Scot A. Kelchner C ASystematic Biology, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18D, Uppsala 75236, Sweden. BCSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. CDepartment of Biology, Utah State University, 5305 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322-5305, USA. DCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. Sequence alignment is just as much a part of phylogenetics as is tree building, although it is often viewed solely as a necessary tool to construct trees. However, alignment for the purpose of phylogenetic inference is primarily about homology, as it is the procedure that expresses homology relationships among the characters, rather than the historical relationships of the taxa. Molecular homology is rather vaguely defined and understood, despite its importance in the molecular age. Indeed, homology has rarely been evaluated with respect to nucleotide sequence alignments, in spite of the fact that nucleotides are the only data that directly represent genotype. All other molecular data represent phenotype, just as do morphology and anatomy. Thus, efforts to improve sequence alignment for phylogenetic purposes should involve a more refined use of the homology concept at a molecular level. To this end, we present examples of molecular-data levels at which homology might be considered, and arrange them in a hierarchy. The concept that we propose has many levels, which link directly to the developmental and morphological components of homology.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions to the Solution of Phylogenetic Problem in Fabales
    Research Article Bartın University International Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences Araştırma Makalesi JONAS, 2(2): 195-206 e-ISSN: 2667-5048 31 Aralık/December, 2019 CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE SOLUTION OF PHYLOGENETIC PROBLEM IN FABALES Deniz Aygören Uluer1*, Rahma Alshamrani 2 1 Ahi Evran University, Cicekdagi Vocational College, Department of Plant and Animal Production, 40700 Cicekdagi, KIRŞEHIR 2 King Abdulaziz University, Department of Biological Sciences, 21589, JEDDAH Abstract Fabales is a cosmopolitan angiosperm order which consists of four families, Leguminosae (Fabaceae), Polygalaceae, Surianaceae and Quillajaceae. The monophyly of the order is supported strongly by several studies, although interfamilial relationships are still poorly resolved and vary between studies; a situation common in higher level phylogenetic studies of ancient, rapid radiations. In this study, we carried out simulation analyses with previously published matK and rbcL regions. The results of our simulation analyses have shown that Fabales phylogeny can be solved and the 5,000 bp fast-evolving data type may be sufficient to resolve the Fabales phylogeny question. In our simulation analyses, while support increased as the sequence length did (up until a certain point), resolution showed mixed results. Interestingly, the accuracy of the phylogenetic trees did not improve with the increase in sequence length. Therefore, this study sounds a note of caution, with respect to interpreting the results of the “more data” approach, because the results have shown that large datasets can easily support an arbitrary root of Fabales. Keywords: Data type, Fabales, phylogeny, sequence length, simulation. 1. Introduction Fabales Bromhead is a cosmopolitan angiosperm order which consists of four families, Leguminosae (Fabaceae) Juss., Polygalaceae Hoffmanns.
    [Show full text]
  • Homology of Process: Developmental Dynamics in Comparative Biology
    Forthcoming in Interface Focus Homology of process: developmental dynamics in comparative biology James DiFrisco1,* and Johannes Jaeger2,3 (1) Institute of Philosophy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (2) Complexity Science Hub (CSH) Vienna, Josefstädter Straße 39, 1080 Vienna, Austria (3) Department of Molecular Evolution & Development, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria Abstract: Comparative biology builds up systematic knowledge of the diversity of life, across evolutionary lineages and levels of organization, starting with evidence from a sparse sample of model organisms. In developmental biology, a key obstacle to the growth of comparative approaches is that the concept of homology is not very well defined for levels of organization that are intermediate between individual genes and morphological characters. In this paper, we investigate what it means for ontogenetic processes to be homologous, focusing specifically on the examples of insect segmentation and vertebrate somitogenesis. These processes can be homologous without homology of the underlying genes or gene networks, since the latter can diverge over evolutionary time, while the dynamics of the process remain the same. Ontogenetic processes like these therefore constitute a dissociable level and distinctive unit of comparison requiring their own specific criteria of homology. In addition, such processes are typically complex and nonlinear, such that their rigorous description and comparison not only requires observation and experimentation, but also dynamical modeling. We propose six criteria of process homology, combining recognized indicators (sameness of parts, morphological outcome, and topological position) with novel ones derived from dynamical systems modeling (sameness of dynamical properties, dynamical complexity, and evidence for transitional forms). We show how these criteria apply to animal segmentation and other ontogenetic processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Quercus Drymeja Unger and Q. Mediterranea Unger
    Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 241 (2017) 98–128 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/revpalbo Taxonomy and palaeoecology of two widespread western Eurasian Neogene sclerophyllous oak species: Quercus drymeja Unger and Q. mediterranea Unger Thomas Denk a,⁎, Dimitrios Velitzelos b,TuncayH.Günerc, Johannes M. Bouchal a,d, Friðgeir Grímsson d,GuidoW.Grimmd,e a Swedish Museum of Natural History, Department of Palaeobiology, Box 50007, 10405 Stockholm, Sweden b National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Faculty of Geology and Geoenvironment, Department of Historical Geology and Paleontology, Panepistimiopolis, Athens 15784, Greece c Istanbul University, Faculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Botany, 34473 Bahceköy, Istanbul, Turkey d University of Vienna, Department of Palaeontology, 1090 Vienna, Austria e Unaffiliated, 45100 Orléans, France article info abstract Article history: Sclerophyllous oaks (genus Quercus) play important roles in Neogene ecosystems of south-western Eurasia. Received 31 May 2016 Modern analogues (‘nearest living relatives’) for these oaks have been sought among five of six infrageneric lin- Accepted 30 January 2017 eages of Quercus, distributed across the entire Northern Hemisphere. A revision of leaf fossils from lower Miocene Available online 10 February 2017 to Pliocene deposits suggests that morphotypes of the Quercus drymeja complex are very similar to a number of extant Himalayan, East Asian, and Southeast Asian species of Quercus Group Ilex and may indicate subtropical, Keywords: Quercus Group Ilex relatively humid conditions. Quercus mediterranea comprises leaf morphotypes that are encountered in modern Plant fossil Mediterranean species of Quercus Group Ilex, but also in Himalayan and East Asian members of this group indi- Modern analogue cating fully humid or summer-wet conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Homology & the Ancient Genetic Toolkit: How Evolutionary
    Regis University ePublications at Regis University All Regis University Theses Spring 2019 Molecular Homology & the Ancient Genetic Toolkit: How Evolutionary Development Could Shape Your Next Doctor's Appointment Elizabeth G. Plender Follow this and additional works at: https://epublications.regis.edu/theses Part of the Cell Biology Commons, Developmental Biology Commons, Evolution Commons, Molecular Biology Commons, and the Molecular Genetics Commons Recommended Citation Plender, Elizabeth G., "Molecular Homology & the Ancient Genetic Toolkit: How Evolutionary Development Could Shape Your Next Doctor's Appointment" (2019). All Regis University Theses. 905. https://epublications.regis.edu/theses/905 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by ePublications at Regis University. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Regis University Theses by an authorized administrator of ePublications at Regis University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MOLECULAR HOMOLOGY AND THE ANCIENT GENETIC TOOLKIT: HOW EVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPMENT COULD SHAPE YOUR NEXT DOCTOR’S APPOINTMENT A thesis submitted to Regis College The Honors Program In partial fulfillment of the requirements For Graduation with Honors By Elizabeth G. Plender May 2019 Thesis written by Elizabeth Plender Approved by Thesis Advisor Thesis Reader Accepted by Director, University Honors Program ii iii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]