DOCSLIB.ORG

Laws Animals

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Laws Animals Volume XLIlI • Number 2 March/April 2010 ProtectingLaws Animals March 2010 Maryland Bar Journal 1 2 Maryland Bar Journal March 2010 Published bimonthly by the Volume XLIII • Number 2 March/April 2010 Maryland State Bar Association, Inc. The Maryland Bar Center 520 W. Fayette St. Baltimore, Maryland 21201 Features Telephone: (410) 685-7878 (800) 492-1964 Laws Protecting Animals Website: www.msba.org Executive Director – Paul V. Carlin Lawyer-Legislator Seeks Better Laws to Protect Animals 4 Editor – Janet Stidman Eveleth Assistant to the Editor – Jason Zeisloft By Janet Stidman Eveleth Attention Lawyers: Sit, Stay, Plan 12 Design – Jason Quick by Barbara Graham and Diana Gary Advertising Sales – Network Publications Subscriptions: MSBA members receive What is the Scope of the Duty to Provide ThE MArylAND BAr JourNAl Veterinary Care? 18 as $20 of their dues payment goes to By Susan J. Hankin publication. others, $42 per year. PoSTMASTEr: Send address change to ThE MArylAND BAr U.S. v. Stevens: The Heart of Protecting Animals 24 JourNAl, 520 W. Fayette St., By Alan S. Nemeth Baltimore, MD 21201. Are Your Neighbors Attacking and Abusing Your Pets? 30 The Maryland Bar Journal welcomes articles on topics of interest to By: Glenn H. Meyer Maryland attorneys. All manuscripts must be original work, Attack On Birds 34 submitted for approval by the Special Committee on Editorial By Lindsay C. Cooper Advisory, and must conform to the Journal style guidelines, which are Compassion for Animals: A Religious Tradition 36 available from the MSBA headquar- By Christine Gutleben ters. The Special Committee reserves the right to reject any manuscript submitted for publication. Changes in State Judicial Processes For Foster Care Children 42 Advertising: Advertising rates will be By Priya Sharma furnished upon request. All advertis- ing is subject to approval by the Editorial Advisory Board. Law and Literature: Truth in Fiction and Law 46 By James M. Kramon Editorial Advisory Board Elizabeth M. Kameen, Chair James B. Astrachan Departments Courtney Blair Ann Norman Bosse Practice Tip Marcella A. holland louise A. lock Enforceability of Venue and Forum-Selection Clauses 50 Victoria henry Pepper Mary langdon Preis Ethics Docket MSBA Officers (2009-2010) Unsolicited Requests by Third Parties for Advice Concerning President - Thomas C. Cardaro Animal Rights Law 53 President-Elect - Thomas D. Murphy Secretary - henry E. Dugan, Jr. Attorney Grievance Commission Treasurer - John Patrick Kudel Spanning the States 54 Statements or opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Maryland State Bar Association, its officers, Board of Governors, the Editorial Board or staff. Publishing an advertisement does not imply endorsement of any product or service offered. March 2010 Maryland Bar Journal 3 4 Maryland Bar Journal March 2010 Lawyer- Legislator Seeks Better Laws to Protect Animals AnimAl Abuse is on the rise in this country By Janet Stidman Eveleth and many of the worst offenders are right here in Maryland. In recent years there has been a rash of vicious and ghastly crimes against ani- mals in this state and some of the worse perpe- trators are children. Last summer juveniles in Baltimore City were responsible for setting both a kitten and a pit bull puppy on fire. The kitten was rescued and survived; the puppy had to be euthanized. Stronger laws are needed to protect animals from abuse. March 2010 Maryland Bar Journal 5 Animal abuse is on the rise in this but it is one of the most serious because legislature may be able to make the country and many of the worst abuses against animals underscore law more effective and workable for offenders are right here in Maryland. the problem of escalating violence in the sake of the person and the animals In recent years there has been a rash today’s society. McComas fears animal with respect to animal hoarding. of vicious and ghastly crimes against cruelty points to a deeper and more McComas is troubled about the animals in this state and some of the troubling trend. There appears to be growing trend of animal cruelty, but worse perpetrators are children. last a direct link between a child’s vio- there is a broad spectrum of animal- summer juveniles in Baltimore City lence toward animals and that child’s related issues that fall under “animal were responsible for setting both a kit- tendency toward violence directed at welfare” and it is only one area of ten and a pit bull puppy on fire. The human beings in the future. interest on her long list of legislative kitten was rescued and survived; the McComas cites a recent Johns priorities. McComas, an energetic and puppy had to be euthanized. Stronger hopkins university study which indi- effective member of Maryland’s house laws are needed to protect animals cates that “if there is cruelty to animals of Delegates for the last seven years, from abuse. by minors, there is more likely to be serves as a watchdog of the more vul- These horrific cases, and the string sociopathic behavior in those minors.” nerable populations, like the elderly of animal abuse incidents reported Thus, in some cases, the roots of vio- and their family caretakers, children with alarming frequency on the eve- lent behavior toward humans can be and animals. She is also concerned ning news, have triggered public out- traced back to violence toward ani- about the fiscal crisis, the health care rage. Many citizens are calling for mals. McComas reports that “one of crisis and all of the other crises con- tougher animal cruelty laws and this the questions asked on a psychiatric fronting the 2010 legislature. outcry has reached the ears of elected interview is ‘Did you abuse animals as In a recent interview with the officials, including state legislators. a child?’ because it can be a barometer Maryland Bar Journal, Delegate Susan one member of the Maryland General of future behavior.” K. McComas, a strong, committed and Assembly’s house of Delegates, Animal hoarding is another, yet dif- compassionate lawyer-legislator and Susan K. McComas, a lawyer-legisla- ferent example of animal abuse. There accomplished solo practitioner, can- tor from harford County, is already have been several cases capturing the didly offered insight into her interest working with a contingency of leg- media’s attention in recent months in animals and her pursuit of animal islators to explore ways to better including one in Delegate McComas’ welfare bills in the legislature. She protect animals from the mounting own jurisdiction. last summer a shared her perspective on legislative threat of animal cruelty. woman in harford County with men- progress to date, MSBA’s Animal law To pursue these protections, tal health issues housed over 40 cats. Section’s valuable legislative role and Delegate McComas and other legisla- Several other incidents, respectively her role as one of the few lawyer- tors are working with a consortium of dealing with a multitude of cats and legislators remaining in the Maryland humane societies and animal welfare dog and a menagerie of pets, were General Assembly. organizations and now, with a group uncovered in the state. While these of dedicated volunteer lawyers from incidents are labeled animal cruelty, it the Maryland State Bar Association’s is hard to compare them with the hei- Background Animal law Section. These energet- nous cruelty undergone by the kitten lawyers were always well respected ic attorneys lend their knowledge, and puppy. in the McComas’ family. “We had var- expertise and legal skills to legislators “We are seeing more animal hoard- ious legal issues in my family, ranging to help advance measures that bet- ing cases,” explains McComas. “but from property and estate to domestic, ter protect animals in the state. The these have a psychological compo- so there was always a lawyer around Section views animal cruelty as a top nent. obviously the person does not and he was the person who helped us legislative priority. intend to be mean or hostile to the solve our problems.” Consequently, Animal cruelty is just one of many animals yet is harming the animals McComas wanted to be a lawyer from legislative issues relating to animal because of his or her mental state. We an early age. welfare currently under consideration need to find an effective treatment for She received her B.A. from Johns by the Maryland General Assembly, these folks.” She is hopeful that the hopkins university in 1974 and grad- 6 Maryland Bar Journal March 2010 March 2010 Maryland Bar Journal 7 uated from the university of Wyoming and personal injury cases who, for the Assembly. “I had worked in the leg- College of law in 1980. While attend- last seven years, has also served as islator as an aide and had thoroughly ing law school, she served as a file a member of the house of Delegates enjoyed it,” she recalls. “I was just a clerk for the Wyoming house of in Maryland’s General Assembly. file clerk, but it was a very interesting representatives, a legal intern for the Today, this busy lawyer-legislator dynamic and environment.” Wyoming Department of health and juggles two virtual full-time jobs. “When I returned to Maryland, I Social Services, a legal researcher for This energetic lawyer-legislator is would sometimes go visit the Senate the National organization of Social able to maintain this balance because in the 1970s and just sit in and listen. I Security Claimants’ representatives “there is an ebb and flow” in her par- enjoyed the debate; it is a marketplace and an intern for Wyoming’s Albany allel workloads. “We now have pro se of politics and ideas.” McComas served County’s legal Services.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Backyard Farming and Slaughtering 2 Keeping Tradition Safe
    Backyard farming and slaughtering 2 Keeping tradition safe FOOD SAFETY TECHNICAL TOOLKIT FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC Backyard farming and slaughtering – Keeping tradition safe Backyard farming and slaughtering 2 Keeping tradition safe FOOD SAFETY TECHNICAL TOOLKIT FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Bangkok, 2021 FAO. 2021. Backyard farming and slaughtering – Keeping tradition safe. Food safety technical toolkit for Asia and the Pacific No. 2. Bangkok. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. © FAO, 2021 Some rights reserved. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO license (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo). Under the terms of this license, this work may be copied, redistributed and adapted for non- commercial purposes, provided that the work is appropriately cited. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that FAO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the FAO logo is not permitted.
    [Show full text]
  • ANIMAL SACRIFICE in ANCIENT MESOPOTAMIAN RELIGION The
    CHAPTER FOURTEEN ANIMAL SACRIFICE IN ANCIENT MESOPOTAMIAN RELIGION JOANN SCURLOCK The relationship between men and gods in ancient Mesopotamia was cemented by regular offerings and occasional sacrifices of ani­ mals. In addition, there were divinatory sacrifices, treaty sacrifices, and even "covenant" sacrifices. The dead, too, were entitled to a form of sacrifice. What follows is intended as a broad survey of ancient Mesopotamian practices across the spectrum, not as an essay on the developments that must have occurred over the course of several millennia of history, nor as a comparative study of regional differences. REGULAR OFFERINGS I Ancient Mesopotamian deities expected to be fed twice a day with­ out fail by their human worshipers.2 As befitted divine rulers, they also expected a steady diet of meat. Nebuchadnezzar II boasts that he increased the offerings for his gods to new levels of conspicuous consumption. Under his new scheme, Marduk and $arpanitum were to receive on their table "every day" one fattened ungelded bull, fine long fleeced sheep (which they shared with the other gods of Baby1on),3 fish, birds,4 bandicoot rats (Englund 1995: 37-55; cf. I On sacrifices in general, see especially Dhorme (1910: 264-77) and Saggs (1962: 335-38). 2 So too the god of the Israelites (Anderson 1992: 878). For specific biblical refer­ ences to offerings as "food" for God, see Blome (1934: 13). To the term tamid, used of this daily offering in Rabbinic sources, compare the ancient Mesopotamian offering term gimi "continual." 3 Note that, in the case of gods living in the same temple, this sharing could be literal.
    [Show full text]
  • Theories of Sacrifice and Ritual
    UC Davis UC Davis Previously Published Works Title Inventing the Scapegoat: Theories of Sacrifice and Ritual Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/055689pg Journal Journal of Ritual Studies, 25(1) Author Janowitz, Naomi Publication Date 2011 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Inventing the Scapegoat: Theories of Sacrifice and Ritual No figure appears in studies of sacrifice more often than the scapegoat. Numerous societies, the argument goes, have a seemingly innate need to purge sins via an innocent victim. The killing of this victim constitutes the core of sacrifice traditions; explaining the efficacy of these rites outlines in turn the inner workings of all sacrifices, if not all rituals. I do not believe, however, that the enigmatic figure of the scapegoat can support a universal theory of sacrifice, especially if the general term “scapegoat” turns out refer to a variety of rituals with very different goals. Rene Girard’s extremely influential theory of the scapegoat includes a biological basis for the importance of the figure (Girard, 1977). According to Girard, humans are naturally aggressive, a la Konrad Lorenz. This innate aggression was channeled into an unending series of attacks and counterattacks during the earliest periods of history. A better outlet for aggression was to find a scapegoat whose death would stop the cycle of retribution (p. 2). For Girard, Oedipus was a human scapegoat, placing this model 2 at the center of Greek culture in addition to Biblical religious traditions (p. 72). Jonathan Smith’s observations on Girard’s model in “The Domestication of Sacrifice” are both simple and devastating (1987).
    [Show full text]
  • Euthanasia of Experimental Animals
    EUTHANASIA OF EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS • *• • • • • • • *•* EUROPEAN 1COMMISSIO N This document has been prepared for use within the Commission. It does not necessarily represent the Commission's official position. A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu.int) Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1997 ISBN 92-827-9694-9 © European Communities, 1997 Reproduction is authorized, except for commercial purposes, provided the source is acknowledged Printed in Belgium European Commission EUTHANASIA OF EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS Document EUTHANASIA OF EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS Report prepared for the European Commission by Mrs Bryony Close Dr Keith Banister Dr Vera Baumans Dr Eva-Maria Bernoth Dr Niall Bromage Dr John Bunyan Professor Dr Wolff Erhardt Professor Paul Flecknell Dr Neville Gregory Professor Dr Hansjoachim Hackbarth Professor David Morton Mr Clifford Warwick EUTHANASIA OF EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS CONTENTS Page Preface 1 Acknowledgements 2 1. Introduction 3 1.1 Objectives of euthanasia 3 1.2 Definition of terms 3 1.3 Signs of pain and distress 4 1.4 Recognition and confirmation of death 5 1.5 Personnel and training 5 1.6 Handling and restraint 6 1.7 Equipment 6 1.8 Carcass and waste disposal 6 2. General comments on methods of euthanasia 7 2.1 Acceptable methods of euthanasia 7 2.2 Methods acceptable for unconscious animals 15 2.3 Methods that are not acceptable for euthanasia 16 3. Methods of euthanasia for each species group 21 3.1 Fish 21 3.2 Amphibians 27 3.3 Reptiles 31 3.4 Birds 35 3.5 Rodents 41 3.6 Rabbits 47 3.7 Carnivores - dogs, cats, ferrets 53 3.8 Large mammals - pigs, sheep, goats, cattle, horses 57 3.9 Non-human primates 61 3.10 Other animals not commonly used for experiments 62 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Biggest Event of the Year for All Maryland Lawyers
    BIGGEST EVENT OF THE YEAR FOR ALL MARYLAND LAWYERS LEGAL SUMMIT & ANNUAL MEETING MARYLAND STATE BAR ASSOCIATION2019 June 12-15, 2019 ● Ocean City, MD A supplement to Conference schedule of events supplied by the MSBA Welcome to the 2019 MSBA Legal Summit & Annual Meeting in Ocean City, Maryland! Our Board, Sections, Committees, and staff have worked extremely hard to bring you an action packed week, filled with programs for all members of the legal profession! The 2019 MSBA Legal Summit & Annual Meeting will kick-off atnoon on Wednesday, June 12, 2019 with pre-conference workshops. At 1 pm, we will introduce our slate of keynote speakers, including Former United States Deputy Attorney General, Rod Rosenstein, Maryland Attorney General, Brian Frosh, D.C. Attorney General, Karl A. Racine, Former Maryland Attorney General, Doug Gansler and Officers CNN Chief Legal Analyst, Jeffrey Toobin. We will also be hosting family friendly events and health & wellness seminars at this time. Wednesday evening will feature Hon. Keith R. Truffer a host of networking opportunities, including the First-Time Attendees Reception, the Welcome Reception, and a fan favorite, the Crab Feast at Hooper’s Crab House President (additional ticketed event - transport provided). On Thursday and Friday, you’ll find a multitude of programs relevant to your Dana O. Williams practice, your sector of the legal profession, and your career. In addition, we will be President-Elect featuring a “Thought Leader Series” to provide programming on emerging areas of law, panels from various legal sector, and perspectives on issues facing the legal profession. As always, networking opportunities and family friendly events are Deborah L.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Cruelty Prosecution
    SPECIAL TOPICS SERIES American Prosecutors Research Institute AnimalAnimal CrueltyCruelty ProsecutionProsecution OpportunitiesOpportunities forfor EarlyEarly ResponseResponse toto CrimeCrime andand InterpersonalInterpersonal ViolenceViolence Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice American Prosecutors Research Institute 99 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 510 Alexandria,VA 22314 www.ndaa.org Thomas J. Charron President Roger Floren Chief of Staff Delores Heredia Ward Director, National Juvenile Justice Prosecution Center Debra Whitcomb Director, Grant Programs and Development © 2006 by the American Prosecutors Research Institute, the non-profit research, training and technical assistance affiliate of the National District Attorneys Association. This project was supported by Grant Number 2002-MU-MU-0003 awarded by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office of Justice Programs, U. S. Department of Justice.This information is offered for educational purposes only and is not legal advice. Points of view or opinions in this publication are those of the authors and do not represent the official position or policies of the United States Department of Justice, the National District Attorneys Association, or the American Prosecutors Research Institute. SPECIAL TOPICS SERIES AnimalAnimal CrueltyCruelty ProsecutionProsecution Opportunities for Early Response to Crime and Interpersonal Violence July 2006 Randall Lockwood, Ph.D. Senior Vice President/ Anticruelty Initiatives
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of the U-Visa As a Crime-Fighting Tool for Law Enforcement Officials - Views from Around the Country1 December 3, 2012
    Report The Importance of the U-visa as a Crime-Fighting Tool for Law Enforcement Officials - Views from Around the Country1 December 3, 2012 Developed by National Immigrant Women’s Advocacy Project2 at American University Washington College of Law As part of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) of 2000, Congress created the U-visa. The U-visa has become an important crime fighting tool that helps law enforcement officials, including police, sheriffs, and prosecutors across the country to build trust with immigrant crime victims and their communities. The U-visa offers undocumented immigrant crime victims the protection and support they need to muster the courage to approach the police, make police reports, and cooperate in the detection, investigation and/or prosecution of perpetrators of domestic violence, sexual assault, human trafficking, murder, manslaughter, felonious assault, and other violent crimes. The U-visa helps both law enforcement officials and immigrant crime victims because the U-visa and DHS policies contain the following key components: Protection of immigrants from deportation Access to legal work authorization Help for immigrant victims who come forward and report crimes whether past, present or future crimes 1 This project was supported by Grant No. 2009‐DG‐BX‐K018 awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance. The Bureau of Justice Assistance is a component of the Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, the SMART Office, and the Office for Victims of Crime. Points of view or opinions in this document are those of the author and do not represent the official position or policies of the United States Department of Justice.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the States 2010: HOW the RECESSION MIGHT CHANGE
    STATE OF THE STATES 2010 HOW THE RECESSION MIGHT CHANGE STATES FEBRUARY 2010 The Pew Center on the States is a division of The Pew Charitable Trusts that identifies and advances effective solutions to critical issues facing states. Pew is a nonprofit organization that applies a rigorous, analytical approach to improve public policy, inform the public and stimulate civic life. PEW CENTER ON THE STATES Susan K. Urahn, managing director ProJect Team: Editors Graphics and Design Diane Fancher Danny Dougherty Lori Grange Design and Publications Barbara Rosewicz Evan Potler Writers Carla Uriona Stephen C. Fehr Pamela M. Prah Christine Vestal ACKNOWLEDGMENTS In addition to those listed above, we would like to recognize and thank Pew colleagues who assisted in this publication. Planning and conception: Katherine Barrett, Doug Chapin, Richard Greene, Kil Huh, Michele Mariani Vaughn, Andrew McDonald and Albert Wat. Photo research: Daniel C. Vock. Reporting assistance: David Harrison. Editorial research: Sarah Emmans, Tiffany Ward and Katharine Zambon. Fact-checking: Nancy Augustine, Megan Cotten, Samuel Derheimer, Melissa Maynard, Matt McKillop, Morgan Shaw and Liz Snyder. Communications: Andrew McDonald and Sarah Holt. Dissemination: Julia Hoppock, Jennifer Peltak, Frederick Schecker and Cari Sutton. We thank the Pew Center on the States project teams for their contributions. We also thank Marcia Kramer of Kramer Editing Services for her editorial assistance. For additional information on Pew and the Center on the States, please visit www.pewcenteronthestates.org. This report is intended for educational and informational purposes. References to specific policy makers or companies have been included solely to advance these purposes and do not constitute an endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation by The Pew Charitable Trusts.
    [Show full text]
  • Actant Stories and the Australian Xenotransplantation Network
    Constructing and Fracturing Alliances: Actant Stories and the Australian Xenotransplantation Network Copyright - Neil Leslie, Wellcome Images; reproduced with permission Peta S. Cook BPhoto; BSocSc (Sociol.) (hons.) Humanities Research Program Queensland University of Technology Submitted in full requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2008 “The XWP [Xenotransplantation Working Party] agree that, in retrospect, a sociologist would have been a useful addition to the group to help understand these issues” (Xenotransplantation Working Party 2004: 14, emphasis added). - i - Keywords sociology; xenotransplantation; transplantation; allotransplantation; actor-network theory; science and technology studies; public understanding of science (PUS); critical public understanding of science (critical PUS); scientific knowledge; public consultation; risk; animals - ii - Abstract Xenotransplantation (XTP; animal-to-human transplantation) is a controversial technology of contemporary scientific, medical, ethical and social debate in Australia and internationally. The complexities of XTP encompass immunology, immunosuppression, physiology, technology (genetic engineering and cloning), microbiology, and animal/human relations. As a result of these controversies, the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), Australia, formed the Xenotransplantation Working Party (XWP) in 2001. The XWP was designed to advise the NHMRC on XTP, if and how it should proceed in Australia, and to provide draft regulatory guidelines. During the period
    [Show full text]
  • Re/Considering Sacrifice, Incarnation and Divine Animality
    Animal Studies Journal Volume 8 Number 2 Article 11 2019 Disturbing Animals in a Christian Perspective: Re/Considering Sacrifice, Incarnation and Divine Animality Nekeisha Alayna Alexis Anabaptist Mennonite Biblical Seminary / Independent Scholar, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/asj Part of the Agricultural and Resource Economics Commons, Art and Design Commons, Art Practice Commons, Australian Studies Commons, Communication Commons, Creative Writing Commons, Digital Humanities Commons, Education Commons, English Language and Literature Commons, Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, Film and Media Studies Commons, Fine Arts Commons, Legal Studies Commons, Linguistics Commons, Philosophy Commons, Political Science Commons, Public Health Commons, Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies Commons, Sociology Commons, and the Theatre and Performance Studies Commons Recommended Citation Alexis, Nekeisha Alayna, Disturbing Animals in a Christian Perspective: Re/Considering Sacrifice, Incarnation and Divine Animality, Animal Studies Journal, 8(2), 2019, 154-174. Available at:https://ro.uow.edu.au/asj/vol8/iss2/11 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Disturbing Animals in a Christian Perspective: Re/Considering Sacrifice, Incarnation and Divine Animality Abstract What does Christianity say about other animals? For many people, Jesus-followers and others alike,
    [Show full text]
  • Baltimore County Democratic Ballot
    OFFICIAL BALLOT GUBERNATORIAL PRIMARY ELECTION JUNE 24, 2014 STATE OF MARYLAND, BALTIMORE COUNTY DEMOCRATIC BALLOT INSTRUCTIONS To vote, completely fill in the oval to the left of your choice(s). Mark only with a #2 pencil. DO NOT ERASE. If you make a mistake you may request a new ballot. If your vote for a candidate is marked in such a manner that your intent is not clearly demonstrated, your vote for that office may not be counted. To protect the secrecy of your vote, do not put your name, initials, or any identifying mark on your official ballot. GOVERNOR / LT. GOVERNOR ATTORNEY GENERAL Vote for One Vote for One Anthony G. Brown Aisha Braveboy And Jon S. Cardin Ken Ulman Brian E. Frosh Doug Gansler REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS And CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 2 Jolene Ivey Vote for One Ralph Jaffe Paul Rundquist And C. A. Dutch Ruppersberger Freda Jaffe Blaine Taylor Heather Mizeur STATE SENATOR And LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT 10 Delman Coates Vote for One Charles U. Smith Stephanie Boston And Delores G. Kelley Clarence Tucker Pat Kelly Cindy A. Walsh And Mary Elizabeth Wingate-Pennacchia COMPTROLLER Vote for One Peter Franchot Unopposed Proof BE SURE THAT YOU HAVE COMPLETED BOTH SIDES OF THIS BALLOT FRONT Card 1 SEQ# 1 HOUSE OF DELEGATES REGISTER OF WILLS LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT 10 Vote for One Vote for No More Than Three Grace G. Connolly Chris Blake Unopposed Benjamin Brooks JUDGE OF THE ORPHANS' COURT Michael Tyrone Brown, Sr. Vote for No More Than Three Regg J. Hatcher, Jr. William R. "Bill" Evans Jay Jalisi Juliet Fisher Robert "Rob" Johnson Arthur M.
    [Show full text]
  • ASPCA®Mission:Orange
    ActionSpring 2007 ASPCA®Mission: Orange™ The ASPCA reaches out to communities nationwide to build a more humane future coast to coast >> PRESIDENT’S NOTE If there were ever any doubt that Americans love their pets, the facts Board of Directors speak for themselves. A recent Officers of the Board American Pet Products Hoyle C. Jones, Chairman, Linda Lloyd Lambert, Manufacturers Association National Vice Chairman, Sally Spooner, Secretary, Pet Owners’ Survey found that James W. Gerard, Treasurer 63% of U.S. households have a pet, Members of the Board Photo by Kristy Leibowitz which equates to 69.1 million Penelope Ayers, Alexandra G. Bishop, J. Elizabeth homes. Of these, 43 million homes have more than one Bradham, Reenie Brown, Patricia J. Crawford, pet. But sadly, for every pet that finds a caring home, Jonathan D. Farkas, Joan C. Hendricks, V.M.D., Ph.D., millions of other animals’ life stories end prematurely in Franklin Maisano, Elizabeth L. Mathieu, Esq., shelters across America. William Morrison Matthews, Majella Matyas, As we enter our 141st year, it gives me great pleasure to Sean McCarthy, Gurdon H. Metz, Leslie Anne Miller, Michael F.X. Murdoch, James L. Nederlander, Jr., let you know that the ASPCA is doing more than ever to Marsha Reines Perelman, George Stuart Perry, help build a more humane future for America’s animals. Helen S.C. Pilkington, Gail Sanger, William Secord, The ASPCA is proud to partner with target animal Frederick Tanne, Richard C. Thompson, welfare organizations across the country to launch Cathy Wallach “ASPCA® Mission: Orange™”—a focused effort to create Directors Emeriti a country of humane communities, one community at a Steven M.
    [Show full text]