DOCSLIB.ORG

Winter 2002 Volume 21 INSIDE: New York to Mutts: “You’Re Worthless” See Page 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Winter 2002 Volume 21 INSIDE: New York to Mutts: “You’Re Worthless” See Page 3 Winter 2002 Volume 21 INSIDE: New York to Mutts: “You’re Worthless” See Page 3 THE QUARTERLY NEWSLETTER OF THE ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND Darwin, Meet Dershowitz Courting legal evolution at Harvard Law ights,” declared Alan Dershowitz, pacing the floor of a lecture hall at Harvard Law School, “grow out of wrongs.” “ It seemed the type of pronounce- Rment Dershowitz, who teaches law at Harvard, might deliver during a typical lecture to one of his classes. But this was no typical lecture, and the Ames Courtroom in Austin Hall bore only a passing resemblance to The Paper Chase. The scene was a first-of-its-kind symposium, “The Evolving Legal Status of Chimpanzees.” And Dershowitz’s featured role signaled how far the idea of legal rights for animals has come since the PHOTO BY NANCY O’BRIEN 1970s, when the fictional Professor Kingsfield did his blustery best to stem the tide of change at Harvard and beyond. Harvard Law School today boasts one of the most active chapters of the Student Animal Legal Defense Fund in the nation. The chapter co-spon- sored the daylong symposium with the Chim- panzee Collaboratory, a consortium of attorneys, scientists and public-policy experts of which sionate to those on whom we impose our rules. Still a “legal thing”— ALDF is a charter member. The symposium was Hence the argument for animal rights.” but for how long? moderated by ALDF President Steve Ann Cham- With his fellow legal scholars Laurence Tribe bers, chair of the Collaboratory’s legal committee (who was scheduled to speak at the symposium, and the primary organizer of the event. but was unable to attend) and Cass Sunstein In his latest book, Shouting Fire, Dershowitz (who did appear), Dershowitz is helping to put — a civil libertarian and appeals specialist best animal law on the map. And for one bright, known for representing high-profile clients like sunny day in October, Harvard was the capital of Mia Farrow, Claus von Bulow and Mike Tyson the emerging new world of animal rights. — notes that “in the world in which we live, World-renowned primatologist Jane Goodall humans make the rules. That reality imposes on us a special responsibility to be fair and compas- Continued on page 4 2 Winter 2002 Letter from the PRESIDENT For the RECORD Repay Faith “That animal liberation is the with Trust(s) logical next step ock ’n’ roll and change have some- in the forward Rthing in common: Both tend to be march of moral loud and boisterous. But just as the Rolling Stones lower the volume for a progress is no ballad now and again, social reform also longer the fringe has its quiet side. Without fuss or fanfare, significant idea it was changes are occurring in the field of back in 1975. estate planning and trust law. And A growing and they’re having a big impact not only on your ability to provide for the ani- increasingly mals you love, but on how the courts influential view the emotional and financial bonds between humans and nonhu- movement of mans generally. philosophers, For decades, trust attorneys have struggled to help animal lovers who wanted to provide for their nonhuman companions after they’re gone. These estate advisors typically told their clients ethicists, law to transfer “ownership” of companion animals — as well as money for their care — to someone professors and they had complete faith in. That faith had to be well-earned indeed, because trusts for animals activists are were not traditionally enforceable. If the friend or family member you chose didn’t use the money as stipulated in the trust, there was little a judge could do about it. convinced that In other words, there was no guarantee that your wishes would be honored — or that the ani- the great moral mals would be cared for. But that’s no longer the case in a growing number of states. Working behind the scenes with struggle of our experts in trust law — including the attorneys who drafted the Uniform Probate and Trust Code, time will be for the uniform laws that many states adopt as their own — ALDF has helped craft new guidelines the rights of that specifically validate trusts for nonhuman animals. These new rules have already been adopt- ed by 19 states: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, animals.” Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Tennessee, Michael Pollan, “An Utah and Washington. In addition, Wisconsin has a provision on honorary trusts, though it does Animal’s Place,” New not specifically provide that a trust for the benefit of nonhuman animals is valid. York Times magazine, Don’t see your state listed above? Then it’s time to turn up the volume a notch — by letting Nov. 10, 2002 your state legislators know how important this issue is to you. For the animals we love, the message is “Gimme Shelter.” By making just a little more noise, we can accelerate the trend toward adoption of trust provisions that enable us, their human “That’s the guardians, to provide for their welfare after we’ve gone. In a nation that regards companion ani- mals as family members, it’s only natural that people would want to include those animals in their problem with estate planning. And the more courts are forced to acknowledge the special bonds between this country.” humans and nonhumans, the closer we are as a society to extending true, lasting, legal protection to animals. Cockfighting fan As Mick Jagger might say: It’s only probate law — but I like it. Robert Novak on CNN’s “Crossfire,” For the animals, complaining that America has “too many” anti-cruelty statutes. Steve Ann Chambers President 3 What’s a Dog’s Life Worth? Animal Legal Defense Fund acked by ALDF, a New York woman is tors which tend to fairly show its value.” seeking to reverse a court ruling that she Attorney David Wolfson, who went before the Bcan’t sue for loss of companionship even appellate court to argue ALDF’s position on recov- though a local pharmacy’s blunder caused the ery for loss of companionship, says that ruling death of her dog. In May 2002, a state appeals amounts to little more than a judicial Catch-22. court rejected the argument (made in friend-of- “They’re saying, ‘With animals that have no the-court briefs filed by ALDF) that due to the market value, you look at other factors to deter- “You have to take emotional bond between humans and companion mine their worth. But no matter what, we won’t the bond that animals, the guardian should be awarded damages let you look at the concept of companionship,’” for pain and suffering when an animal is killed says Wolfson, of New York’s Milbank, Tweed, existed between maliciously or negligently. Now attorneys retained Hadley & McCloy. “Well, most companion ani- Iris Lewis and by ALDF are petitioning New York’s highest court mals don’t do anything other than provide com- to take another look at that argument. panionship. So if you can’t put a value on that, Emily into In 1997, Iris Lewis purchased medicine for then there’s nothing, and the judgment ends up consideration.” Emily, a 9-year-old Chow, at a Stone Ridge, N.Y., saying that companion animals in New York are pharmacy. The directions on the medicine were worthless under the law.” Attorney Len Egert mislabeled, resulting in the dog’s death. Lewis Far from worthless, Emily meant so much to filed suit, seeking reimbursement for the thou- Lewis she once risked her life to save her, jumping sands of dollars in emergency medical care the into a frozen lake after the dog fell through the ice. error cost her. She also sought damages for a “It’s ludicrous to say that Emily was just a much more painful consequence of the pharma- piece of property — a thing,” says Lewis. cy’s mistake: the loss of Emily’s friendship. Now Lewis and her In 1999, ALDF stepped in, filing an amicus attorney are working Emily curiae brief that argued for Lewis’ right to claim with Amy Trakinski and damages for loss of companionship. A state Len Egert, animal law appeals court judge agreed. But in early June, a specialists retained by higher appellate court overturned the decision. ALDF, to launch an “Pets are recognized as personal property,” the appeal. As this issue of judges wrote in their decision, “and damages for The Animals’ Advocate the loss of a pet are limited to the value of the pet went to press, Trakinski at the time it died, which are ordinarily proven by and Egert hoped to have establishing the market value of the pet, if it has a petition before the New one, or, if there is no market value, by such fac- York Court of Appeals by the end of December. “Saying there are no damages when a compan- A New Way to ion animal dies under cir- cumstances like these flies Show Your Support in the face of public opin- nterested in finding a new way to help ani- ion and public policy,” Imals? Well, it might be as easy as taking a Egert says. “You have to picture off the wall or digging out those col- take the bond that existed between Iris Lewis and lectibles in the closet. In the months ahead, Emily into consideration. Most Americans would ALDF will be gathering unique and valuable be willing to do that. The courts should be, too.” items for a silent auction.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A New Progressivism Cass R
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Coase-Sandor Working Paper Series in Law and Coase-Sandor Institute for Law and Economics Economics 2005 A New Progressivism Cass R. Sunstein Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/law_and_economics Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Cass R. Sunstein, "A New Progressivism" (John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics Working Paper No. 245, 2005). This Working Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Coase-Sandor Institute for Law and Economics at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Coase-Sandor Working Paper Series in Law and Economics by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHICAGO JOHN M. OLIN LAW & ECONOMICS WORKING PAPER NO. 245 (2D SERIES) A New Progressivism Cass R. Sunstein THE LAW SCHOOL THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO May 2005 This paper can be downloaded without charge at: The Chicago Working Paper Series Index: http://www.law.uchicago.edu/Lawecon/index.html and at the Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection: http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=726443 A New Progressivism Cass R. Sunstein* Abstract Based on an address for a conference on Law and Transformation in South Africa, this paper explores problems with two twentieth-century approaches to government: the way of markets and the way of planning. It urge that the New Progressivism simultaneously offers (1) a distinctive conception of government’s appropriate means, an outgrowth of the late-twentieth-century critique of economic planning, and (2) a distinctive understanding of government’s appropriate ends, an outgrowth of evident failures with market arrangements and largely a product of the mid-twentieth-century critique of laissez faire.
    [Show full text]
  • Representations and Discourse of Torture in Post 9/11 Television: an Ideological Critique of 24 and Battlestar Galactica
    REPRESENTATIONS AND DISCOURSE OF TORTURE IN POST 9/11 TELEVISION: AN IDEOLOGICAL CRITIQUE OF 24 AND BATTLSTAR GALACTICA Michael J. Lewis A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2008 Committee: Jeffrey Brown, Advisor Becca Cragin ii ABSTRACT Jeffrey Brown Advisor Through their representations of torture, 24 and Battlestar Galactica build on a wider political discourse. Although 24 began production on its first season several months before the terrorist attacks, the show has become a contested space where opinions about the war on terror and related political and military adventures are played out. The producers of Battlestar Galactica similarly use the space of television to raise questions and problematize issues of war. Together, these two television shows reference a long history of discussion of what role torture should play not just in times of war but also in a liberal democracy. This project seeks to understand the multiple ways that ideological discourses have played themselves out through representations of torture in these television programs. This project begins with a critique of the popular discourse of torture as it portrayed in the popular news media. Using an ideological critique and theories of televisual realism, I argue that complex representations of torture work to both challenge and reify dominant and hegemonic ideas about what torture is and what it does. This project also leverages post-structural analysis and critical gender theory as a way of understanding exactly what ideological messages the programs’ producers are trying to articulate.
    [Show full text]
  • Animals and Ethics Fall, 2017, P
    Philosophy 174a Ethics and Animals Fall 2017 Instructor: Teaching Fellow: Chris Korsgaard Ahson Azmat 205 Emerson Hall [email protected] [email protected] Office Hours: Mondays 1:30-3:30 Description: Do human beings have moral obligations to the other animals? If so, what are they, and why? Should or could non-human animals have legal rights? Should we treat wild and domestic animals differently? Do human beings have the right to eat the other animals, raise them for that purpose on factory farms, use them in experiments, display them in zoos and circuses, make them race or fight for our entertainment, make them work for us, and keep them as pets? We will examine the work of utilitarian, Kantian, and Aristotelian philosophers, and others who have tried to answer these questions. This course, when taken for a letter grade, meets the General Education requirement for Ethical Reasoning. Sources and How to Get Them: Many of the sources from we will be reading from onto the course web site, but you will need to have copies of Singer’s Animal Liberation, Regan’s The Case for Animal Rights, Mill’s Utilitarianism and Coetzee’s The Lives of Animals. I have ordered all the main books from which we will be reading (except my own book, which is not yet published) at the Coop. The main books we will be using are: Animal Liberation, by Peter Singer. Updated edition, 2009, by Harper Collins Publishers. The Case for Animal Rights, by Tom Regan. University of California Press, 2004. Fellow Creatures: Our Obligations to the Other Animals, by Christine M.
    [Show full text]
  • Rattling the Cage Defended Steven M
    Boston College Law Review Volume 43 Article 2 Issue 3 Number 3 5-1-2002 Rattling the Cage Defended Steven M. Wise Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr Part of the Animal Law Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation Steven M. Wise, Rattling the Cage Defended, 43 B.C.L. Rev. 623 (2002), http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr/vol43/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RATTLING THE CAGE DEFENDED STEVEN M. WISE* Abstract: In Rattling the Cage: Toward Levi Rights for Animals, the author advocated basic legal rights—specifically common law rights—for chimpanzees, bonobos, and other nonhuman animals. In this Article, the author responds to many of the major criticisms of Rattling the Cage. The author confronts critics of his historical arguments for legal rights for nonhuman animals, tracing those arguments through ancient philosophy and nineteenth century English statutes. The author also expands upon his legal arguments for animal rights, reexamining various theories of rights and justifications for treating animals as property, Finally, borrowing from his upcoming book Drawing the Line: Science and The Case for Animal Rights, the author defends his advocacy of legal rights for nonhuman animals based on the relative autonomy nonhuman animals possess. INTRODUCTION "The 'animal rights' movement is gathering steam and Steven Wise is one of the pistons."l Thus Judge Richard Posner began a Yale Law Journal review of my book, Rattling the Cage: Toward Legal Rights for Animals, published in 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Contextualizing Ancient Greek Blood Sports
    Contextualizing Ancient Greek Blood Sports While research on Roman spectacles of bestial violence (e.g. venationes, damnatio ad bestias) has had success in elucidating the cultural and universal meanings of these events, less attention has been paid to acts of communal violence against animals within the ancient Greek world. There is ample evidence for the existence of quail flipping, partridge fighting, bull fighting, cockfighting, and other acts such as bull leaping and animal baiting, to show that the Greeks found value in these blood sports. Although past scholars have addressed issues such as the symbolism of cocks and cockfighting (Csapso 1993) and the potential psychology and sociology underlying the events (Shelton 2011; Geertz 1971 on Balinese cockfighting), few have attempted to analyze these various games and contests within the overarching scheme of Greek athletics. While victories in chariot racing at Olympia could confer honor onto a polis (one may recall Alcibiades boasting of such a deed during the debate about the Sicilian expedition, Thucydides, 6.16), the outcome of the smaller blood sports brought about honors inherently limited to closed circles of individuals. Further, the heightened violence of these games necessitates an analysis in regards to their social functions and meanings. While it is accepted that blood sports among the Greeks could serve as markers of status and masculinity (Kyle 2007), further research is needed to explain why these events could serve such a function and also how the honors obtained differed from those acquired through the games and athletics of the Pan-Hellenic sanctuaries. Given the richness of evidence in both the literary and material record, the Greek predilection for cockfighting is a natural place to begin an inquiry into Greek blood sports.
    [Show full text]
  • An Inquiry Into Animal Rights Vegan Activists' Perception and Practice of Persuasion
    An Inquiry into Animal Rights Vegan Activists’ Perception and Practice of Persuasion by Angela Gunther B.A., Simon Fraser University, 2006 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the School of Communication ! Angela Gunther 2012 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Summer 2012 All rights reserved. However, in accordance with the Copyright Act of Canada, this work may be reproduced, without authorization, under the conditions for “Fair Dealing.” Therefore, limited reproduction of this work for the purposes of private study, research, criticism, review and news reporting is likely to be in accordance with the law, particularly if cited appropriately. Approval Name: Angela Gunther Degree: Master of Arts Title of Thesis: An Inquiry into Animal Rights Vegan Activists’ Perception and Practice of Persuasion Examining Committee: Chair: Kathi Cross Gary McCarron Senior Supervisor Associate Professor Robert Anderson Supervisor Professor Michael Kenny External Examiner Professor, Anthropology SFU Date Defended/Approved: June 28, 2012 ii Partial Copyright Licence iii Abstract This thesis interrogates the persuasive practices of Animal Rights Vegan Activists (ARVAs) in order to determine why and how ARVAs fail to convince people to become and stay veg*n, and what they might do to succeed. While ARVAs and ARVAism are the focus of this inquiry, the approaches, concepts and theories used are broadly applicable and therefore this investigation is potentially useful for any activist or group of activists wishing to interrogate and improve their persuasive practices. Keywords: Persuasion; Communication for Social Change; Animal Rights; Veg*nism; Activism iv Table of Contents Approval ............................................................................................................................. ii! Partial Copyright Licence .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bioethical Questions of Animals in Sport1
    Preliminary communication UDK: 17:798/799 636.046:17 Bruno Ćurko (Croatia) Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Split [email protected] BIOETHICAL QUESTIONS OF ANIMALS IN SPORT1 Abstract Animals are a part of sport industries, from the so-called traditions such as fox hunting and bullfighting, horse and dog racing, to the cruel examples of hare coursing, rodeo, and orangutan boxing (Thailand), to cock and dog fights. These are prominent examples of animal exploitation serving our human entertainment. In my presentation, I will try to identify some of the essential questions considering animal use in sports. Some of these questions are: Can we justify animal exploitation in the name of tradition? Can we take into consideration the well-being of sport animals before, during, and after their competitive career? How much could and should the imminent risk of animal stress, injuries, and fatalities prevent us from their exploitation in sports? If animals are ready to obey demands we set upon them, should we abuse them for our entertainment and sport? Keywords: animals, sports industry, cultural tradition, bioethics, entertainment 1 This paper is an elaborated adaptation of a lecture titled “Bioethical Questions of Animals in Sport”, presented at the conference “3rd Osijek days of bioethics” - Faculty of Education, J. J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, 11–12 November 2019. Pannoniana, vol. IV, no. I (2020): 143-153 Introduction When we think about animals in sport, we usually think about activities where people use animals in some competitions such as horse races, dog races, and other similar ones. But first, we need to research the definition of sport as it is.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Bulls and Bullfights in Contemporary Spain
    SOCIAL THOUGHT & COMMENTARY Torophies and Torphobes: The Politics of Bulls and Bullfights in Contemporary Spain Stanley Brandes University of California, Berkeley Abstract Although the bullfight as a public spectacle extends throughout southwestern Europe and much of Latin America, it attains greatest political, cultural, and symbolic salience in Spain. Yet within Spain today, the bullfight has come under serious attack, from at least three sources: (1) Catalan nationalists, (2) Spaniards who identify with the new Europe, and (3) increasingly vocal animal rights advocates. This article explores the current debate—cultural, political, and ethical—on bulls and bullfighting within the Spanish state, and explores the sources of recent controversy on this issue. [Keywords: Spain, bullfighting, Catalonia, animal rights, public spectacle, nationalism, European Union] 779 Torophies and Torphobes: The Politics of Bulls and Bullfights in Contemporary Spain s is well known, the bullfight as a public spectacle extends through- A out southwestern Europe (e.g., Campbell 1932, Colomb and Thorel 2005, Saumade 1994), particularly southern France, Portugal, and Spain. It is in Spain alone, however, that this custom has attained notable polit- ical, cultural, and symbolic salience. For many Spaniards, the bull is a quasi-sacred creature (Pérez Álvarez 2004), the bullfight a display of exceptional artistry. Tourists consider bullfights virtually synonymous with Spain and flock to these events as a source of exotic entertainment. My impression, in fact, is that bullfighting is even more closely associated with Spanish national identity than baseball is to that of the United States. Garry Marvin puts the matter well when he writes that the cultur- al significance of the bullfight is “suggested by its general popular image as something quintessentially Spanish, by the considerable attention paid to it within Spain, and because of its status as an elaborate and spectacu- lar ritual drama which is staged as an essential part of many important celebrations” (Marvin 1988:xv).
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Rights
    Book Review Animal Rights Richard A. Posner' Rattling the Cage: Toward Legal Rightsfor Animals. By Steven M. Wise. Cambridge,Mass.: PerseusBooks, 2000. Pp. 362. $25.00. The "animal rights" movement is gathering steam, and Steven Wise is one of the pistons. A lawyer whose practice is the protection of animals, he has now written a book in which he urges courts in the exercise of their common-law powers of legal rulemaking to confer legally enforceable rights on animals, beginning with chimpanzees and bonobos (the two most intelligent primate species).' Although Wise is well-informed about his subject-the biological as well as legal aspects-this is not an intellectually exciting book. I do not say this in criticism. Remember who Wise is: a practicing lawyer who wants to persuade the legal profession that courts should do much more to protect animals. Judicial innovation proceeds incrementally; as Holmes put it, the courts, in their legislative capacity, "are confined from molar to molecular motions."2 Wise's practitioner's perspective is, as we shall see, both the strength and the weakness of the book. f Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit; Senior Lecturer, University of Chicago Law School. I thank Michael Boudin, Richard Epstein, Lawrence Lessig, Martha Nussbaum, Charlene Posner, and Cass Sunstein for their very helpful comments on a previous draft of this Review. * Adjunct Professor, John Marshall Law School; Adjunct Professor, Vermont Law School; President, Center for the Expansion of Fundamental Rights; Partner, Wise & Slater-Wise, Boston. 1. These are closely related species, and Wise discusses them more or less interchangeably.
    [Show full text]
  • Inspiring Americans to Greatness Attendees of the 2019 Freedom Conference Raise Their Hands in Solidarity with Hong Kong Pro-Democracy Protesters
    Annual Report 2019-20 Inspiring Americans to Greatness Attendees of the 2019 Freedom Conference raise their hands in solidarity with Hong Kong pro-democracy protesters The principles espoused by The Steamboat Institute are: Limited taxation and fiscal responsibility • Limited government • Free market capitalism Individual rights and responsibilities • Strong national defense Contents INTRODUCTION EMERGING LEADERS COUNCIL About the Steamboat Institute 2 Meet Our Emerging Leaders 18 Letter from the Chairman 3 MEDIA COVERAGE AND OUTREACH AND EVENTS PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT Campus Liberty Tour 4 Media Coverage 20 Freedom Conferences and Film Festival 8 Social Media Analytics 21 Additional Outreach 10 FINANCIALS TONY BLANKLEY FELLOWSHIP 2019-20 Revenue & Expenses 22 FOR PUBLIC POLICY & AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM FUNDING About the Tony Blankley Fellowship 11 2019 and 2020 Fellows 12 Funding Sources 23 Past Fellows 14 MEET OUR PEOPLE COURAGE IN EDUCATION AWARD Board of Directors 24 Recipients 16 National Advisory Board 24 Our Team 24 The Steamboat Institute 2019-20 Annual Report – 1 – About The Steamboat Institute Here at the Steamboat Institute, we are Defenders of Freedom When we started The Steamboat Institute in 2008, it was and Advocates of Liberty. We are admirers of the bravery out of genuine concern for the future of our country. We take and rugged individualism that has made this country great. seriously the concept that freedom is never more than one We are admirers of the greatness and wisdom that resides generation away from extinction. in every individual. We understand that this is a great nation because of its people, not because of its government. The Steamboat Institute has succeeded beyond anything Like Thomas Jefferson, we would rather be, “exposed to we could have imagined when we started in 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Cruelty Prosecution
    SPECIAL TOPICS SERIES American Prosecutors Research Institute AnimalAnimal CrueltyCruelty ProsecutionProsecution OpportunitiesOpportunities forfor EarlyEarly ResponseResponse toto CrimeCrime andand InterpersonalInterpersonal ViolenceViolence Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice American Prosecutors Research Institute 99 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 510 Alexandria,VA 22314 www.ndaa.org Thomas J. Charron President Roger Floren Chief of Staff Delores Heredia Ward Director, National Juvenile Justice Prosecution Center Debra Whitcomb Director, Grant Programs and Development © 2006 by the American Prosecutors Research Institute, the non-profit research, training and technical assistance affiliate of the National District Attorneys Association. This project was supported by Grant Number 2002-MU-MU-0003 awarded by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office of Justice Programs, U. S. Department of Justice.This information is offered for educational purposes only and is not legal advice. Points of view or opinions in this publication are those of the authors and do not represent the official position or policies of the United States Department of Justice, the National District Attorneys Association, or the American Prosecutors Research Institute. SPECIAL TOPICS SERIES AnimalAnimal CrueltyCruelty ProsecutionProsecution Opportunities for Early Response to Crime and Interpersonal Violence July 2006 Randall Lockwood, Ph.D. Senior Vice President/ Anticruelty Initiatives
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethics of Human-Chicken Relationships in Video Games: the Origins of the Digital Chicken B
    The ethics of human-chicken relationships in video games: the origins of the digital chicken B. Tyr Fothergill Catherine Flick School of Archaeology and Ancient De Montfort University History The Gateway University of Leicester, Leicester Leicester, United Kingdom LE1 7RH, United Kingdom LE1 9BH, United Kingdom +44 0116 223 1014 +44 116 207 8487 [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT depicted being. In this paper, we explore the many and varied In this paper, we look at the historical place that chickens have roles and uses of the chicken in video games and contextualize held in media depictions and as entertainment, analyse several these with archaeological and historical data. types of representations of chickens in video games, and draw out 2. THE DOMESTICATION AND SPREAD reflections on society in the light of these representations. We also look at real-life, modern historical, and archaeological evidence of OF Gallus gallus, THE CHICKEN chicken treatment and the evolution of social attitudes with regard Humans have conceptually and physically shaped and re-shaped to animal rights, and deconstruct the depiction of chickens in the other animal species with which we have interacted; few video games in this light. examples of this are more striking than the chicken. Domestication is often conceived of as an activity undertaken by Categories and Subject Descriptors humans which converts a wild plant or animal into something K.4.0 General else, a living thing entirely under the control of or dependent upon humans to survive. The complexities of such a transformation are General Terms immense, and are more accurately framed as “an ongoing co- Human Factors, Theory evolutionary process rather than an event or invention” [15].
    [Show full text]