Download Thesis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download Thesis This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Negotiating Queenship from Malory to Shakespeare Glyn, Elizabeth L Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 1 Negotiating Queenship from Malory to Shakespeare Elizabeth L. Glyn PhD (Kings College London), 2015 2 Abstract Queenship is a highly contested issue across the medieval and early modern periods, yet too often the subject is addressed as if those periods were discrete and distinct. In this thesis I assess certain selected literary and documentary representations of controversial queenship in the context of the history of such representations, to argue that artificial periodisation has hindered our understanding of discourses of queenship. Over time representations of idealised queenship remain consistently aware of the overarching problem of female rule. Recurring allegations of misconduct and subversion by queens suggest ongoing anxieties about female power, which are visible too in the proliferation of medieval and early modern literary defences of queens. I focus in particular on the idea of intercessory queenship, considering how this alternates with active, and in some cases even military, queenship. In so doing, I will uncover the discursive limits of autonomy for royal women. I consider a range of interconnected texts all of which use nostalgia for the past both to recreate and to question ideals of female influence. I begin by showing how Guenevere in Malory’s Morte Darthur permits a defence of Margaret of Anjou which is not couched in terms of the norms of queenly subordination. I then show how Shakespeare’s Henry VI plays manifest disquiet at Margaret’s militancy even while they create a portrait of an effective queen whose agency is entirely focussed on upholding her husband’s sovereignty. I then turn to the unexpected interchangeability of Queens Katherine and Anne in Henry VIII through which Shakespeare and Fletcher dramatise counterintuitively parallel versions of female defiance; here, queenship appears to be set free from the dominant model of intercessory influence and yet remains benign. Finally, I shall argue that disquiet at the idea of female autonomy is apparent in the return to Amazonian themes in Shakespeare’s The Two Noble Kinsmen as well as in various court masques written for Queen Anna, wife to James I. 3 Table of Contents Introduction 4-29 1 Malory’s Guenevere: Questioning Intercessory Ideals of Queenship 30-84 2 Shakespeare’s Romance History: In Defence of Margaret 85-133 3 Katherine versus Anne in Shakespeare and Fletcher’s Henry VIII and its sources 134-185 4 Jacobean Queenship: Revival and Renewal in Shakespeare and Fletcher’s The Two Noble Kinsmen and Anna of Denmark’s masques 186-240 Conclusion 241-246 Bibliography 247-272 4 Introduction In February 2013, to accompany the recent publication of her acclaimed fictional account of the life of Thomas Cromwell and the fall of Anne Boleyn, Bring Up the Bodies, Hilary Mantel wrote an essay in the London Review of Books in which she described the Duchess of Cambridge as a ‘jointed doll on which certain rags are hung …. a shop-window mannequin, with no personality of her own’.1 Mantel generated a storm of protest, most of which mistook her words for criticism of the duchess’ personality rather than of ongoing social and political expectations that women play a silent, passive and mediative role. Mantel, it seems to me, simply pointed out that the assumption of silence does not sit comfortably in an age which, in theory at least, allows women political autonomy of their own. Although few commentators relayed any of the rest of her essay, in fact she went on to say that ‘in looking at royalty we are always looking at what is archaic, what is mysterious by its nature …. Royal persons are both gods and beasts’.2 Mantel sees the depiction of royal women as both admirable and monstrous. In this thesis, I shall explore the ways in which discourses of queenship have conjured up such ‘gods and beasts’ and I shall identify unexpected patterns in literary, dramatic and historiographical treatments of royal women. This thesis will take the form of a series of case studies in which I seek to uncover the discursive limits of autonomy for royal women. My primary focus is the plays of Shakespeare, but I begin with an inescapably medieval text, Malory’s Morte Darthur, to emphasise the continuities of representation of royal women across the periods we call “medieval” and “early modern”, and I will also address a series of works by playwrights and poets other than Shakespeare. In chapter 1, I will consider Malory’s new treatment of Guenevere in Morte Darthur. Malory, writing during the Wars of the Roses in the latter half of the fifteenth century, takes on an earlier romance tradition which portrayed the queen, Guenevere, as vindictive and destructive; he chooses the more benign version 1 Hilary Mantel, ‘Royal Bodies’, London Review of Books, Vol 35, No. 4, 21 February 2013, 3-7 (p. 3). 2 ‘Royal Bodies’, p. 5. 5 of her from the available sources ─ although he doesn’t invent it. The Guenevere of Morte Darthur, as I shall show, is benevolent and astute; she defends herself and the honour of the king and she has a godly end. In chapter 1 I shall argue that changes to his presentation of Guenevere enable Malory to say more about queenship than he could by describing the contemporary, and highly controversial, queen Margaret of Anjou directly. No less than Morte Darthur, Shakespeare’s early plays show a clear sense of their own place on a historical spectrum; I will move on in chapter 2 to consider Shakespeare’s three Henry VI plays. Here I will argue that whilst Shakespeare’s Margaret is vicious and bloodthirsty (the epitome of Mantel’s ‘beast’), she is also always clearly motivated by the need to protect her rights and the rights of her son and her husband. Even whilst Shakespeare’s presentation of Margaret owes a great deal to medieval chronicle sources, it also makes deliberate use of romance archetypes in its depiction of her as heroic yet transgressive. In chapter 3 I turn my attention to Jacobean representations of late medieval queenship by identifying an unexpected interchangeability between Queens Katherine and Anne in Shakespeare and Fletcher’s Henry VIII. This play does not simply balance an idealised queen against a malignant ‘other’, a virtuous queen against a subversive one: on the contrary, it subverts its sources so as to conflate these two women, Katherine and Anne. In the process, it presents a parallel version of female defiance which subverts historiographical ‘truths’. In chapter 4 I will demonstrate that the presentation of female autonomy in the other extant Shakespeare/Fletcher collaboration, The Two Noble Kinsmen, should be considered in the light of Queen Anna’s court masques. By the time Kinsmen and the masques were composed, intercession had become explicitly oppositional and the valorisation of chastity rather than marriage had become subversive; I shall show how these texts articulate a newly circumscribed post-Elizabethan female power. It is clear that I will not be providing a strictly chronological view of female sovereignty through the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. I will argue, instead, that the discourse of queenship refuses to abide by the artificial periodisation that separates the medieval from the early modern 6 and that commentators have failed to take enough account of the senses of history that dominate most texts about the subject of queenship. We shall see that representations of queenship don't steadily become more modern ─ in fact, they revert to earlier modes in certain political circumstances. Over the course of this thesis, too, I will demonstrate that the discourse of queenship over a long period, expressed in a variety of different texts from chronicle to dramatic, takes the form of an ongoing and often fractious negotiation between intercessory and autonomous, sometimes even militant, female power. I shall show how Malory’s new treatment of queenship in Morte Darthur ─ printed in 1485 by Caxton and circulated widely ─ feeds directly into the revival of a debate about Margaret’s queenship in Shakespeare’s earliest histories, written in the early 1590s. Shakespeare does not return to de casibus history until Henry VIII, written in 1613 in collaboration with John Fletcher. We shall see that the overarching link between his earliest work and his last is its medievalism; Shakespeare was at his least medievalist between 1593 and around 1612.
Recommended publications
  • Fatal Colours—PKY—234X153mm FATALCPR01
    ORION FATALC Unit $$PR Page 1 Fatal Colours—PKY—234x153mm FATALCPR01 FATAL COLOURS Input Data Services Ltd 01-17-2011 10:38:36 ORION FATALC Unit $$PR Page 2 Fatal Colours—PKY—234x153mm FATALCPR01 Input Data Services Ltd 01-17-2011 10:38:36 ORION FATALC Unit $$PR Page 3 Fatal Colours—PKY—234x153mm FATALCPR01 FATAL COLOURS the battle of towton 1461 George Goodwin Weidenfeld & Nicolson london Input Data Services Ltd 01-17-2011 10:38:36 ORION FATALC Unit $$PR Page 4 Fatal Colours—PKY—234x153mm FATALCPR01 First published in Great Britain in 2011 by Weidenfeld & Nicolson 13579108642 Text © George Goodwin 2011 Maps © David Hoxley 2011 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of both the copyright owner and the above publisher. The right of George Goodwin to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act of 1988. A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. hb isbn-13 978 0 297 86071 6 Typset by Input Data Services Ltd, Bridgwater Somerset Printed and bound in the UK by CPI Mackays, Chatham, Kent The Orion Publishing Group’s policy is to use papers that are natural, renewable and recyclable products and made from wood grown in sustainable forests. The logging and manufacturing processes are expected to conform to the environmental regulations of the country of origin.
    [Show full text]
  • Phd Thesis Carolyn Donohue.Pdf
    Public Display and the Construction of Monarchy in Yorkist England, 1461-85 Carolyn Anne Donohue PhD History University of York September 2013 Abstract The years 1461-85 were a particularly volatile period for the English crown, damaged by civil war and repeated usurpation. Edward IV's accession in 1461 was the culmination of a decade of intense debate on governance that had descended into violent conflict. In order to sustain his position after seizing the throne, it was essential to establish military and administrative dominance within the realm, but also to assert his legitimacy and worthiness to rule, and urgently to secure the allegiance of his subjects. This dissertation examines the construction and evolution of Yorkist monarchy from this foundation in bloodshed and discord. The focus is on the ways in which royal display served to bond people to the regime and how texts and images asserted a distinct Yorkist royal identity. The investigation encompasses a wide range of public events centred on the display of majesty, from rituals such as coronations, funerals and marriages to civic pageantry, tournaments, the reception of distinguished visitors, and the king's performance in parliament, on the battlefield and as promoted and commemorated in Yorkist texts. This broad scope facilitates a comprehensive understanding of the significance of royal spectacle and the ideas and imagery of Yorkist monarchy that were of paramount importance throughout the period. The approach is thematic, analysing the places where Yorkist monarchy was displayed, the ways in which an elite was cultivated in circles of intimacy around the king, and the messages communicated through the written word and visual symbolism.
    [Show full text]
  • “No Gretter Perile”: Over-Mighty Subjects and Fifteenth-Century Politics in Malory’S Morte Darthur
    “No gretter perile”: Over-mighty Subjects and Fifteenth-Century Politics in Malory’s Morte Darthur Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Michael M. Baker, M.A. Graduate Program in English The Ohio State University 2013 Dissertation Committee: Karen A. Winstead, Advisor Richard Firth Green Ethan Knapp Copyright by Michael M. Baker 2013 Abstract Traditionally read as a deeply nostalgic text – one that looks back to Arthur’s Camelot as a Golden Age of English history and chivalry – Sir Thomas Malory’s Morte Darthur is, instead, a very contemporarily relevant text. Completed in 1469/70, at the mathematical center of the divisive Wars of the Roses (c. 1455-1485), Malory’s Morte considers problematic contemporary political issues that threaten the peace and stability of the realm. Chief among these are issues involving over-mighty subjects, identified by Sir John Fortescue in The Governance of England (c. 1471/75) as the greatest threat to fifteenth-century kings. Since K. B. McFarlane’s 1964 declaration that “only an undermighty ruler had anything to fear from overmighty subjects,” however, the over- mighty have been under-studied. It is important, though, when examining a text to consider the prevalent beliefs of its time; even if McFarlane’s statement is true, neither Fortescue nor Malory would have agreed with it. Malory’s Morte does not create perfect analogues to fifteenth-century persons or events (i.e., Lancelot is not the Kingmaker, the final battle near Salisbury is not Towton), but it does create many parallels to fifteenth-century political issues.
    [Show full text]
  • John Capgrave's the Life of Saint Katherine As Yorkist Propaganda
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-2005 Piety and Politics: John Capgrave's The Life of Saint Katherine as Yorkist Propaganda Michael M. Baker University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Baker, Michael M., "Piety and Politics: John Capgrave's The Life of Saint Katherine as Yorkist Propaganda. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2005. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/583 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Michael M. Baker entitled "Piety and Politics: John Capgrave's The Life of Saint Katherine as Yorkist Propaganda." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in English. Thomas J. Heffernan, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Laura L. Howes, Roy Liuzza Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting a thesis written by Michael M.
    [Show full text]
  • Public and Private in the Writings of Leon Battista Alberti
    Public and Private in the Writings of Leon Battista Alberti by Anne-Marie Sorrenti A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Italian Studies University of Toronto © Copyright by Anne-Marie Sorrenti 2014 Public and Private in the Writings of Leon Battista Alberti Anne-Marie Sorrenti Doctor of Philosophy Department of Italian Studies University of Toronto 2014 Abstract Through an examination of works by Leon Battista Alberti, namely De iure, Della famiglia, selections from Intercenales, and parts of De re aedificatoria, this dissertation studies how Alberti conceptualizes public and private in legal, social, and architectural terms. The key to his thought on the subject is found in De iure, a lesser-known tract of his, not generally considered by literary scholars. Analyzed here in relation to the other writings, it sheds new light on Alberti by demonstrating that the ordering of public law above private law and the notion of the telos of the public good were deeply ingrained in his thought. The re-examination of Della famiglia from the viewpoint of his legal thought demonstrates that for Alberti public concerns are more important than private ones. Certain interlocutors, who argue that private interests are more important than the public good, also focus on the importance of secrecy and dissimulation in various forms of human interactions, including friendship. The dissertation also treats Alberti's approach to public and private in the development of the theme of marriage and infidelity both in Della famiglia and in four of his Intercenales (Maritus, Uxoria, Amores, and Vidua), none of which has been studied at length ii in this way in the existing scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wars of the Roses Free
    FREE THE WARS OF THE ROSES PDF Alison Weir | 496 pages | 01 Jul 1996 | Random House USA Inc | 9780345404336 | English | New York, United States Mother's Day: War of the Roses - RealMoney But, argues historian Matthew Lewis, the roots of these dynastic civil wars went deeper and the branches reached further than this year timeframe suggests. In Julya mysterious man known as Jack Cade led a huge force of common men from Kent into London to protest against the ailing government of the Lancastrian king Henry VI. This episode is generally regarded as being outside the bounds of the Wars of the Roses, but those edges are blurred and elastic. The Mortimer line was considered by many to be senior to the Lancastrian line, since the Mortimers were heirs apparent to Richard II — so adding weight to the later Yorkist claim to the throne. The Mortimer Earls of March had been considered the lawful heirs of the childless Richard II before he was deposed, and the Lancastrian kings The Wars of the Roses them with suspicion. Was Jack Cade a son of this deposed line seeking restitution? Cade — who was captured and fatally wounded following the failure of his The Wars of the Roses — is a fascinating, elusive figure. Was he a genuine claimant to the throne, a social campaigner, or a puppet? So good-looking, in fact, that it hampered his performance on the battlefield. Among those marching south to join them was an army under the Yorkist Earl of Salisbury. Against the odds, Salisbury won the day but his tired, battered column still needed to reach Ludlow.
    [Show full text]
  • Alex Brondarbit Article: ‘Into Our Defense and Saveguarde’
    2017 IV Alex Brondarbit Article: ‘Into our defense and saveguarde’ “Into our defense and saveguarde”: Eton College and the Good Lordship of Edward, Duke of York1 Alex Brondarbit Abstract: The events in the first phase of the Wars of the Roses that led to Edward, Duke of York’s accession to the English throne in the spring of 1461 as Edward IV are well- established, yet Edward’s personality and activity before he became king have remained opaque to historical scrutiny. How much of a role did he play in seizing the crown? Was he a cipher of Richard Neville, Earl of Warwick in the initial stages of his career? A rare signet warrant from Edward granting protection to the Lancastrian foundation of Eton College just days prior to his usurpation of Henry VI illuminates the role Edward played at this early stage of his political career. By the date of the grant, Edward was already an accomplished military leader with a substantial ducal affinity; however, he was a relative unknown figure with little experience in national politics, overshadowed by his more illustrious cousin, the “Kingmaker”. This document attests to Edward’s emerging political agency, placing the duke’s signet warrant within the context of earlier Yorkist rhetoric and providing a more nuanced view of events on the ground on the eve of his usurpation. Keywords: England; Wars of the Roses; Edward IV; Henry VI; Eton College or the historian of the medieval period, it is often a difficult, if not impossible, task to fully illuminate the machinations of the great at moments of calamity and to F understand how those susceptible to the powerful reacted to the turbulence of their time.
    [Show full text]
  • English Political Propaganda, 1377–1485
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Huddersfield Repository 1 English Political Propaganda, 1377–1485. Sarah K. Gaunt A thesis submitted to the University of Huddersfield in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. April 2018. 2 Copyright statement The author of this thesis (including any appendices and/or schedules to this thesis) owns any copyright in it (the “Copyright”) and s/he has given The University of Huddersfield the right to use such copyright for any administrative, promotional, educational and/or teaching purposes. i. Copies of this thesis, either in full or in extracts, may be made only in accordance with the regulations of the University Library. Details of these regulations may be obtained from the Librarian. This page must form part of any such copies made. ii. The ownership of any patents, designs, trademarks and any and all other intellectual property rights except for the Copyright (the “Intellectual Property Rights”) and any reproductions of copyright works, for example graphs and tables (“Reproductions”), which may be described in this thesis, may not be owned by the author and may be owned by third parties. Such Intellectual Property Rights and Reproductions cannot and must not be made available for use without the prior written permission of the owner(s) of the relevant Intellectual Property Rights and/or Reproductions 3 Abstract. Previous historiography on propaganda has focussed on particular themes or time periods; this thesis provides a comprehensive and inclusive analysis drawing on a multidisciplinary approach to encompass the period c.1377-1485.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Fifteenth-Century Chronicles, with Historical Memoranda by John
    THREE FIFTEENTH-CENTURY CHEONICLES, HISTORICAL MEMORANDA BY JOHN STOWE, THE ANTIQUARY, AND CONTEMPORARY NOTES OF OCCURRENCES WRITTEN BY HIM IN THE REIGN OF QUEEN ELIZABETH. EDITED BY JAMES GAIRDNEE. or rui PRINTED FOR THE CAMDEN SOCIETY. M.DCCC.LXXX. I- i Hi 1?^ WESTMINSTER: PRINTED BY J. B. NICHOLS AND SONS, 25, PARLIAMENT STREET. ^/^<// [new series XXVIII.] COUNCIL OF THE CAMDEN SOCIETY FOR THE YEAR 1880-1 President, THE RIGHT HON. THE EARL OF VERULAM, F.R.G.S. WILLIAM CHAPPELL, ESQ., F.S.A., Treasurer. HENRY CHARLES COOTE, ESQ., F.S.A. F. W. COSENS, ESQ., F.S.A. JAMES E. DOYLE, ESQ. JAMES GAIRDNER, ESQ. SAMUEL RAWSON GARDINER, ESQ., Director. WILLIAM OXENHAM HEWLETT, ESQ., F.S.A ALFRED KINGSTON, ESQ., Secretary. CHARLES A. J. MASON, ESQ. STUART A. MOORE, ESQ., F.S.A. FREDERIC OUVRY, ESQ., V.P.S.A. THE EARL OF POWIS, LL.D. EVELYN PHILIP SHIRLEY, ESQ., M.A.. F.S.A REV. W. SPARROW SIMPSON, D.D. F.S.A. JAMES SPEDDING. ESQ. The Council of the Camden Society desire it to be nnder- stood that they are not answerable for any opinions or obserya- tions that may appear in the Society's publications ; the Editors of the several works being alone responsible for the same. ;; PREFACE. Some years ago, while engaged on my edition of the Paston Letters, I was anxious to examine as far as possible every original source of information for the reigns of Henry VI. and Edward lY. and, having found some unedited matter relating to those reio^ns in two MSS.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Thesis (1).Pdf
    University of Huddersfield Repository Gaunt, Sarah K. English Political Propaganda, 1377–1485. Original Citation Gaunt, Sarah K. (2018) English Political Propaganda, 1377–1485. Doctoral thesis, The University of Huddersfield. This version is available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/34644/ The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided: • The authors, title and full bibliographic details is credited in any copy; • A hyperlink and/or URL is included for the original metadata page; and • The content is not changed in any way. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/ 1 English Political Propaganda, 1377–1485. Sarah K. Gaunt A thesis submitted to the University of Huddersfield in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. April 2018. 2 Copyright statement The author of this thesis (including any appendices and/or schedules to this thesis) owns any copyright in it (the “Copyright”) and s/he has given The University of Huddersfield the right to use such copyright for any administrative, promotional, educational and/or teaching purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Shakespeare and the Earl of Warwick: the Kingmaker in the Henry Vi Trilogy
    SHAKESPEARE AND THE EARL OF WARWICK: THE KINGMAKER IN THE HENRY VI TRILOGY By Helen Patricia Maskew A Thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham For the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY The Shakespeare Institute The University of Birmingham January 2009 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This thesis is an appraisal of Shakespeare’s characterisation of Richard Neville, the Earl of Warwick, colloquially known by his soubriquet ‘kingmaker’. Shakespeare’s reification of the reputations of characters from the regal history of late medieval England substantially maintains our interest in historical figures such as Warwick. By a process of dramatic and literary osmosis, Shakespeare infiltrates the national consciousness with such figures, refreshing individual and collective memory. The majority of the thesis is taken up with an examination of key scenes which I consider most successfully explore the roots of Warwick’s reputation. Finally, I will consider Warwick’s role in performance, though a discourse with three actors who have previously been assigned the role. I will examine their various approaches to the characterisation of the part.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Scenario (PDF)
    he continuing feud between THE BATTLE OF NORTHAMPTON the Percy family and the Nev- illes provided both the back- THEME T drop and catalyst to open TRENCHES & TREACHERY conflict. The culmination of this happened when the Percys (tradi- In 1460 it had been less than a year since the Wars of the Roses tional Earls of Northumberland) had broken out. There had been skirmishes and increasing politi- and the Duke of Somerset had en- trenched Margaret as de facto ruler cal tensions fermenting for nearly ten years prior to this. The wars of the kingdom due to Henry’s de- themselves were born out of the power that Margaret of Anjou had teriorating mental health. York and over her husband, Henry VI, and the appointment of her family his supporters withdrew from court to avoid their arrest and this led to and supporters to positions of power throughout the realm. both factions start to arm for war. Conflict broke out when the York- By Eoghan Kelly ist forces repelled an ambush at Blore Heath but the fortunes of the House of York were at a low follow- ing the collapse of their army at the battle of Ludford Bridge in 1459. The various leaders fled into exile. Richard, Duke of York, went to Ire- land where he was Lord Lieutenant (and had the support of the Irish Parliament and landowners). More significantly, Richard Neville, Earl of Warwick left for Calais, where he had significant support. The control of Calais al- lowed Warwick to control the seas and thereby also the wool trade.
    [Show full text]