Download the Scenario (PDF)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download the Scenario (PDF) he continuing feud between THE BATTLE OF NORTHAMPTON the Percy family and the Nev- illes provided both the back- THEME T drop and catalyst to open TRENCHES & TREACHERY conflict. The culmination of this happened when the Percys (tradi- In 1460 it had been less than a year since the Wars of the Roses tional Earls of Northumberland) had broken out. There had been skirmishes and increasing politi- and the Duke of Somerset had en- trenched Margaret as de facto ruler cal tensions fermenting for nearly ten years prior to this. The wars of the kingdom due to Henry’s de- themselves were born out of the power that Margaret of Anjou had teriorating mental health. York and over her husband, Henry VI, and the appointment of her family his supporters withdrew from court to avoid their arrest and this led to and supporters to positions of power throughout the realm. both factions start to arm for war. Conflict broke out when the York- By Eoghan Kelly ist forces repelled an ambush at Blore Heath but the fortunes of the House of York were at a low follow- ing the collapse of their army at the battle of Ludford Bridge in 1459. The various leaders fled into exile. Richard, Duke of York, went to Ire- land where he was Lord Lieutenant (and had the support of the Irish Parliament and landowners). More significantly, Richard Neville, Earl of Warwick left for Calais, where he had significant support. The control of Calais al- lowed Warwick to control the seas and thereby also the wool trade. This eco- nomic stranglehold meant that the traders in London were aware their fortunes lay tied to York and his supporters. Despite hav- ing won a decisive victory, Margaret’s supporters had frittered it away in less than six months, and her actions of promoting favourites and family members drove more marginal members of court into the opposition camp. Feeling the time was right, War- wick (along with Salisbury and York’s son Edward) landed at Sandwich in Kent in late June 1460. They only had a small force, but their broad support in the south of England allowed them to pick up garrisons from the channel ports and to march on London. There they entered on 2nd of July without any sig- nificant opposition. The garrison n The Earl of Warwick watches the action at the Battle of North- Wargames, soldiers & strategy 98 1 ampton while Francesco Coppini, the Bishop of Turin, excommuni- cates the Yorkists' enemies. From the cover of Medieval Warfare V-3. © Giuseppe Rava © Michael Perry Edward's men cross unopposed as Grey's men withdraw. and command of London sought ref- the King. The Yorkists persisted in their tively untested. Roll a d6 at the first uge in the Tower of London, and after claim the conflict was not with the melee clash of the battle, on a 1 he leaving a small force to besiege them King but with his advisors and certain is considered a poor commander, (the last siege of the Tower) War- supporters. Somerset refused permis- on a 2 average, 3 or 4 he wick marched north to try and raise sion and after several more abortive is good and 5 or 6 he is the land in support of York who was attempts to talk, Warwick notified his outstanding. waiting in Ireland for the right time to opponents that he would join battle at land. Warwick’s goal was Coventry, 2 PM that afternoon. Right Battle - William where the court had resided for sev- Neville, Lord Faucon- eral years, and where Henry’s power THE GAME berg, 55 and an experi- enced commander having base was at its strongest. This generic scenario is designed to started his military career be adapted to any Medieval rules. On the 9th of July, Warwick ap- You should be able to adapt the sim- as a youth in Henry V’s proached the grounds of Delapré Ab- ple special rules and the army lists army in France. He is an bey, a Clunaic Convent, that lay to the to your favourite set. Some sugges- outstanding commander. southeast of Northampton and domi- tions are made in the text for specif- nated the main road through the area. Centre Battle - Richard ic rules. Both Swordpoint and Hail Henry and Margaret had deployed Neville, Earl of War- Caesar use the concept of an Army their army in a strong defensive po- wick, was considered Commander, for example. sition, with their flanks (and rear) the leader of the Neville protected by the river Nene. In their faction in the long stand- front, spread along the entire army, THE FORCES ing feud with the Percy was a water filled ditch. On the 10th Yorkist Commanders family. Warwick’s power the Yorkist army deployed on the field Left Battle (the Vanguard) - Edward, gained through political and Warwick attempted to speak to Earl of March, 18 years old and rela- skill, military ability, and Wargames, soldiers & strategy 98 2 clever marriage has made him Left Battle - John Talbot, 2nd Earl © Michael Perry one of the most powerful in of Shrewsbury, 43 years old and an the land, and this power experienced statesman and leader. will gain him the soubri- He originally sided with Warwick quet of ‘The Kingmaker’. He but changed allegiance following may act as Army General. the First Battle of St Albans. A Good Commander. Loyalty rating 5+ Troops Three battles of roughly 1,000 Right Battle - Edmund Grey, 1st Earl men each. The make up is as follows: of Kent (Lord Grey of Ruthin), 45 and an experienced commander. His on- • 600 foot men-at-arms, well ar- going feud with Henry Holland, 3rd moured and equipped with bills, Duke of Exeter, in a property dispute polearms, maces and swords. had caused considerable unhappi- These are split into 2 units. ness with the lack of support he felt • 300 archers equipped with he was due from the Crown. A Good longbows, fielded as one unit. Commander. Loyalty rating 3+ • 100 mounted knights on ar- moured horses and equipped Centre Battle - Humphrey Stafford, with lances and melee weap- 1st Duke of Buckingham, 58 and was ons, fielded as one unit. These considered to be loyal beyond ques- were nominally the body- tion. He served the Kings father in guard for each of the com- France and then acted as bodyguard manders of the battles. They to the current monarch. Although may dismount. related to the Nevilles he staunchly supported the Queens position. An For Lion Rampant, treat each ‘Battle’ average leader. Loyalty rating 6+ as a separate command with one Men at Arms, two expert Serjeants Royal Tent - The bodyguard is com- and one Expert Bowmen. manded by Percy and Beaumont. Both are outstanding leaders but may only Lancastrian Commanders command the bodyguard. Henry and Overall General - Henry VI, King Margaret are also at the Royal Tent. of England. Henry is an inept com- mander and gives no ‘Army Com- Troops tion, a 2 to 1 ratio of billmen to arch- mander’ bonus to the Lancastrians. Three battles of roughly 1,000 men ers and a small men-at-arms contin- He spent the battle in his tent praying. each, similar to the Yorkist disposi- gent. However, the units of men at arms must be deployed at the rear to guard the Royal tent. © Rocío Espin © Rocío Finally, the Royal forces had four bombards – this was the first time that gunpowder weapons were de- ployed in England. These were de- ployed in front of the centre battle. SPECIAL RULES Loyalty The Lancastrian player has three loy- alty tokens. They are allocated to the Lancastrian Battles, with no maxi- mum or minimum. The Yorkist play- er has four tokens. These are also allocated to the Lancastrian Battles. Any battle that has more Yorkist to- kens than Lancastrian is subject to a Loyalty test. A roll is made per addi- tional token and any roll equal to or over the value will cause that noble and all their Battle to become neu- 3 Wargames, soldiers & strategy 98 Warwick's men force their way over the defences and into Buckingham's men who are guarding the camp. trals and withdraw from the field. Initiative and weather his retainers and his Queen. Shrews- This test is only taken when forces The Yorkists move first and always bury, Buckingham, Egremont and are within charge range. To keep this have the initiative. The weather is dry Beaumont were all killed trying to a surprise, only the Yorkist player but misty due to recent rain, visibility save Henry and he was captured by may know which force or forces will is reduced and the ground is difficult an archer called Henry Mountfort. be testing their loyalty. going for cavalry. Following this victory the Duke of Artillery VICTORY York was spurred to land in Eng- The wonder weapons were slightly Victory goes to the side who controls land and following a campaign he hampered by a heavy rainstorm just the field. A major victory is scored by was killed at the Battle of Wake- before the battle. To reflect this and the Yorkists if they capture the King. A field, leaving Edward as the Duke to allow the possibility of their use Major victory is won by the Lancas- of York. He fought a series of cam- (historically they never fired) test trians if they kill either Warwick or paigns that culminated in his de- each gun when it wants to fire. Roll Richard (and it’s fair to say complete struction of the last Lancastrian D6 and on a 6 a wise gunner has victory in the wars if they kill both!) force in March 1461 and he was kept a single charge dry and the gun duly crowned Edward IV, the first will fire once (and once only).
Recommended publications
  • Fatal Colours—PKY—234X153mm FATALCPR01
    ORION FATALC Unit $$PR Page 1 Fatal Colours—PKY—234x153mm FATALCPR01 FATAL COLOURS Input Data Services Ltd 01-17-2011 10:38:36 ORION FATALC Unit $$PR Page 2 Fatal Colours—PKY—234x153mm FATALCPR01 Input Data Services Ltd 01-17-2011 10:38:36 ORION FATALC Unit $$PR Page 3 Fatal Colours—PKY—234x153mm FATALCPR01 FATAL COLOURS the battle of towton 1461 George Goodwin Weidenfeld & Nicolson london Input Data Services Ltd 01-17-2011 10:38:36 ORION FATALC Unit $$PR Page 4 Fatal Colours—PKY—234x153mm FATALCPR01 First published in Great Britain in 2011 by Weidenfeld & Nicolson 13579108642 Text © George Goodwin 2011 Maps © David Hoxley 2011 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of both the copyright owner and the above publisher. The right of George Goodwin to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act of 1988. A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. hb isbn-13 978 0 297 86071 6 Typset by Input Data Services Ltd, Bridgwater Somerset Printed and bound in the UK by CPI Mackays, Chatham, Kent The Orion Publishing Group’s policy is to use papers that are natural, renewable and recyclable products and made from wood grown in sustainable forests. The logging and manufacturing processes are expected to conform to the environmental regulations of the country of origin.
    [Show full text]
  • Phd Thesis Carolyn Donohue.Pdf
    Public Display and the Construction of Monarchy in Yorkist England, 1461-85 Carolyn Anne Donohue PhD History University of York September 2013 Abstract The years 1461-85 were a particularly volatile period for the English crown, damaged by civil war and repeated usurpation. Edward IV's accession in 1461 was the culmination of a decade of intense debate on governance that had descended into violent conflict. In order to sustain his position after seizing the throne, it was essential to establish military and administrative dominance within the realm, but also to assert his legitimacy and worthiness to rule, and urgently to secure the allegiance of his subjects. This dissertation examines the construction and evolution of Yorkist monarchy from this foundation in bloodshed and discord. The focus is on the ways in which royal display served to bond people to the regime and how texts and images asserted a distinct Yorkist royal identity. The investigation encompasses a wide range of public events centred on the display of majesty, from rituals such as coronations, funerals and marriages to civic pageantry, tournaments, the reception of distinguished visitors, and the king's performance in parliament, on the battlefield and as promoted and commemorated in Yorkist texts. This broad scope facilitates a comprehensive understanding of the significance of royal spectacle and the ideas and imagery of Yorkist monarchy that were of paramount importance throughout the period. The approach is thematic, analysing the places where Yorkist monarchy was displayed, the ways in which an elite was cultivated in circles of intimacy around the king, and the messages communicated through the written word and visual symbolism.
    [Show full text]
  • “No Gretter Perile”: Over-Mighty Subjects and Fifteenth-Century Politics in Malory’S Morte Darthur
    “No gretter perile”: Over-mighty Subjects and Fifteenth-Century Politics in Malory’s Morte Darthur Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Michael M. Baker, M.A. Graduate Program in English The Ohio State University 2013 Dissertation Committee: Karen A. Winstead, Advisor Richard Firth Green Ethan Knapp Copyright by Michael M. Baker 2013 Abstract Traditionally read as a deeply nostalgic text – one that looks back to Arthur’s Camelot as a Golden Age of English history and chivalry – Sir Thomas Malory’s Morte Darthur is, instead, a very contemporarily relevant text. Completed in 1469/70, at the mathematical center of the divisive Wars of the Roses (c. 1455-1485), Malory’s Morte considers problematic contemporary political issues that threaten the peace and stability of the realm. Chief among these are issues involving over-mighty subjects, identified by Sir John Fortescue in The Governance of England (c. 1471/75) as the greatest threat to fifteenth-century kings. Since K. B. McFarlane’s 1964 declaration that “only an undermighty ruler had anything to fear from overmighty subjects,” however, the over- mighty have been under-studied. It is important, though, when examining a text to consider the prevalent beliefs of its time; even if McFarlane’s statement is true, neither Fortescue nor Malory would have agreed with it. Malory’s Morte does not create perfect analogues to fifteenth-century persons or events (i.e., Lancelot is not the Kingmaker, the final battle near Salisbury is not Towton), but it does create many parallels to fifteenth-century political issues.
    [Show full text]
  • John Capgrave's the Life of Saint Katherine As Yorkist Propaganda
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-2005 Piety and Politics: John Capgrave's The Life of Saint Katherine as Yorkist Propaganda Michael M. Baker University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Baker, Michael M., "Piety and Politics: John Capgrave's The Life of Saint Katherine as Yorkist Propaganda. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2005. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/583 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Michael M. Baker entitled "Piety and Politics: John Capgrave's The Life of Saint Katherine as Yorkist Propaganda." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in English. Thomas J. Heffernan, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Laura L. Howes, Roy Liuzza Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting a thesis written by Michael M.
    [Show full text]
  • Public and Private in the Writings of Leon Battista Alberti
    Public and Private in the Writings of Leon Battista Alberti by Anne-Marie Sorrenti A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Italian Studies University of Toronto © Copyright by Anne-Marie Sorrenti 2014 Public and Private in the Writings of Leon Battista Alberti Anne-Marie Sorrenti Doctor of Philosophy Department of Italian Studies University of Toronto 2014 Abstract Through an examination of works by Leon Battista Alberti, namely De iure, Della famiglia, selections from Intercenales, and parts of De re aedificatoria, this dissertation studies how Alberti conceptualizes public and private in legal, social, and architectural terms. The key to his thought on the subject is found in De iure, a lesser-known tract of his, not generally considered by literary scholars. Analyzed here in relation to the other writings, it sheds new light on Alberti by demonstrating that the ordering of public law above private law and the notion of the telos of the public good were deeply ingrained in his thought. The re-examination of Della famiglia from the viewpoint of his legal thought demonstrates that for Alberti public concerns are more important than private ones. Certain interlocutors, who argue that private interests are more important than the public good, also focus on the importance of secrecy and dissimulation in various forms of human interactions, including friendship. The dissertation also treats Alberti's approach to public and private in the development of the theme of marriage and infidelity both in Della famiglia and in four of his Intercenales (Maritus, Uxoria, Amores, and Vidua), none of which has been studied at length ii in this way in the existing scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wars of the Roses Free
    FREE THE WARS OF THE ROSES PDF Alison Weir | 496 pages | 01 Jul 1996 | Random House USA Inc | 9780345404336 | English | New York, United States Mother's Day: War of the Roses - RealMoney But, argues historian Matthew Lewis, the roots of these dynastic civil wars went deeper and the branches reached further than this year timeframe suggests. In Julya mysterious man known as Jack Cade led a huge force of common men from Kent into London to protest against the ailing government of the Lancastrian king Henry VI. This episode is generally regarded as being outside the bounds of the Wars of the Roses, but those edges are blurred and elastic. The Mortimer line was considered by many to be senior to the Lancastrian line, since the Mortimers were heirs apparent to Richard II — so adding weight to the later Yorkist claim to the throne. The Mortimer Earls of March had been considered the lawful heirs of the childless Richard II before he was deposed, and the Lancastrian kings The Wars of the Roses them with suspicion. Was Jack Cade a son of this deposed line seeking restitution? Cade — who was captured and fatally wounded following the failure of his The Wars of the Roses — is a fascinating, elusive figure. Was he a genuine claimant to the throne, a social campaigner, or a puppet? So good-looking, in fact, that it hampered his performance on the battlefield. Among those marching south to join them was an army under the Yorkist Earl of Salisbury. Against the odds, Salisbury won the day but his tired, battered column still needed to reach Ludlow.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Thesis
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Negotiating Queenship from Malory to Shakespeare Glyn, Elizabeth L Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 1 Negotiating Queenship from Malory to Shakespeare Elizabeth L. Glyn PhD (Kings College London), 2015 2 Abstract Queenship is a highly contested issue across the medieval and early modern periods, yet too often the subject is addressed as if those periods were discrete and distinct.
    [Show full text]
  • Alex Brondarbit Article: ‘Into Our Defense and Saveguarde’
    2017 IV Alex Brondarbit Article: ‘Into our defense and saveguarde’ “Into our defense and saveguarde”: Eton College and the Good Lordship of Edward, Duke of York1 Alex Brondarbit Abstract: The events in the first phase of the Wars of the Roses that led to Edward, Duke of York’s accession to the English throne in the spring of 1461 as Edward IV are well- established, yet Edward’s personality and activity before he became king have remained opaque to historical scrutiny. How much of a role did he play in seizing the crown? Was he a cipher of Richard Neville, Earl of Warwick in the initial stages of his career? A rare signet warrant from Edward granting protection to the Lancastrian foundation of Eton College just days prior to his usurpation of Henry VI illuminates the role Edward played at this early stage of his political career. By the date of the grant, Edward was already an accomplished military leader with a substantial ducal affinity; however, he was a relative unknown figure with little experience in national politics, overshadowed by his more illustrious cousin, the “Kingmaker”. This document attests to Edward’s emerging political agency, placing the duke’s signet warrant within the context of earlier Yorkist rhetoric and providing a more nuanced view of events on the ground on the eve of his usurpation. Keywords: England; Wars of the Roses; Edward IV; Henry VI; Eton College or the historian of the medieval period, it is often a difficult, if not impossible, task to fully illuminate the machinations of the great at moments of calamity and to F understand how those susceptible to the powerful reacted to the turbulence of their time.
    [Show full text]
  • English Political Propaganda, 1377–1485
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Huddersfield Repository 1 English Political Propaganda, 1377–1485. Sarah K. Gaunt A thesis submitted to the University of Huddersfield in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. April 2018. 2 Copyright statement The author of this thesis (including any appendices and/or schedules to this thesis) owns any copyright in it (the “Copyright”) and s/he has given The University of Huddersfield the right to use such copyright for any administrative, promotional, educational and/or teaching purposes. i. Copies of this thesis, either in full or in extracts, may be made only in accordance with the regulations of the University Library. Details of these regulations may be obtained from the Librarian. This page must form part of any such copies made. ii. The ownership of any patents, designs, trademarks and any and all other intellectual property rights except for the Copyright (the “Intellectual Property Rights”) and any reproductions of copyright works, for example graphs and tables (“Reproductions”), which may be described in this thesis, may not be owned by the author and may be owned by third parties. Such Intellectual Property Rights and Reproductions cannot and must not be made available for use without the prior written permission of the owner(s) of the relevant Intellectual Property Rights and/or Reproductions 3 Abstract. Previous historiography on propaganda has focussed on particular themes or time periods; this thesis provides a comprehensive and inclusive analysis drawing on a multidisciplinary approach to encompass the period c.1377-1485.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Fifteenth-Century Chronicles, with Historical Memoranda by John
    THREE FIFTEENTH-CENTURY CHEONICLES, HISTORICAL MEMORANDA BY JOHN STOWE, THE ANTIQUARY, AND CONTEMPORARY NOTES OF OCCURRENCES WRITTEN BY HIM IN THE REIGN OF QUEEN ELIZABETH. EDITED BY JAMES GAIRDNEE. or rui PRINTED FOR THE CAMDEN SOCIETY. M.DCCC.LXXX. I- i Hi 1?^ WESTMINSTER: PRINTED BY J. B. NICHOLS AND SONS, 25, PARLIAMENT STREET. ^/^<// [new series XXVIII.] COUNCIL OF THE CAMDEN SOCIETY FOR THE YEAR 1880-1 President, THE RIGHT HON. THE EARL OF VERULAM, F.R.G.S. WILLIAM CHAPPELL, ESQ., F.S.A., Treasurer. HENRY CHARLES COOTE, ESQ., F.S.A. F. W. COSENS, ESQ., F.S.A. JAMES E. DOYLE, ESQ. JAMES GAIRDNER, ESQ. SAMUEL RAWSON GARDINER, ESQ., Director. WILLIAM OXENHAM HEWLETT, ESQ., F.S.A ALFRED KINGSTON, ESQ., Secretary. CHARLES A. J. MASON, ESQ. STUART A. MOORE, ESQ., F.S.A. FREDERIC OUVRY, ESQ., V.P.S.A. THE EARL OF POWIS, LL.D. EVELYN PHILIP SHIRLEY, ESQ., M.A.. F.S.A REV. W. SPARROW SIMPSON, D.D. F.S.A. JAMES SPEDDING. ESQ. The Council of the Camden Society desire it to be nnder- stood that they are not answerable for any opinions or obserya- tions that may appear in the Society's publications ; the Editors of the several works being alone responsible for the same. ;; PREFACE. Some years ago, while engaged on my edition of the Paston Letters, I was anxious to examine as far as possible every original source of information for the reigns of Henry VI. and Edward lY. and, having found some unedited matter relating to those reio^ns in two MSS.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Thesis (1).Pdf
    University of Huddersfield Repository Gaunt, Sarah K. English Political Propaganda, 1377–1485. Original Citation Gaunt, Sarah K. (2018) English Political Propaganda, 1377–1485. Doctoral thesis, The University of Huddersfield. This version is available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/34644/ The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided: • The authors, title and full bibliographic details is credited in any copy; • A hyperlink and/or URL is included for the original metadata page; and • The content is not changed in any way. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/ 1 English Political Propaganda, 1377–1485. Sarah K. Gaunt A thesis submitted to the University of Huddersfield in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. April 2018. 2 Copyright statement The author of this thesis (including any appendices and/or schedules to this thesis) owns any copyright in it (the “Copyright”) and s/he has given The University of Huddersfield the right to use such copyright for any administrative, promotional, educational and/or teaching purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Shakespeare and the Earl of Warwick: the Kingmaker in the Henry Vi Trilogy
    SHAKESPEARE AND THE EARL OF WARWICK: THE KINGMAKER IN THE HENRY VI TRILOGY By Helen Patricia Maskew A Thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham For the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY The Shakespeare Institute The University of Birmingham January 2009 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This thesis is an appraisal of Shakespeare’s characterisation of Richard Neville, the Earl of Warwick, colloquially known by his soubriquet ‘kingmaker’. Shakespeare’s reification of the reputations of characters from the regal history of late medieval England substantially maintains our interest in historical figures such as Warwick. By a process of dramatic and literary osmosis, Shakespeare infiltrates the national consciousness with such figures, refreshing individual and collective memory. The majority of the thesis is taken up with an examination of key scenes which I consider most successfully explore the roots of Warwick’s reputation. Finally, I will consider Warwick’s role in performance, though a discourse with three actors who have previously been assigned the role. I will examine their various approaches to the characterisation of the part.
    [Show full text]