DOCSLIB.ORG

Shakespeare and the Earl of Warwick: the Kingmaker in the Henry Vi Trilogy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Shakespeare and the Earl of Warwick: the Kingmaker in the Henry Vi Trilogy SHAKESPEARE AND THE EARL OF WARWICK: THE KINGMAKER IN THE HENRY VI TRILOGY By Helen Patricia Maskew A Thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham For the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY The Shakespeare Institute The University of Birmingham January 2009 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This thesis is an appraisal of Shakespeare’s characterisation of Richard Neville, the Earl of Warwick, colloquially known by his soubriquet ‘kingmaker’. Shakespeare’s reification of the reputations of characters from the regal history of late medieval England substantially maintains our interest in historical figures such as Warwick. By a process of dramatic and literary osmosis, Shakespeare infiltrates the national consciousness with such figures, refreshing individual and collective memory. The majority of the thesis is taken up with an examination of key scenes which I consider most successfully explore the roots of Warwick’s reputation. Finally, I will consider Warwick’s role in performance, though a discourse with three actors who have previously been assigned the role. I will examine their various approaches to the characterisation of the part. In the course of distilling Warwick’s clearly defined characteristics, Shakespeare examines fundamental questions of the delegation of right to rule and the accepted qualities required for effective leadership. In this context, the dramatist follows the course of events by which the Kingmaker achieved the agnomen which continues to define him as a symbol of medieval potency. DEDICATION To my grandchildren ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to acknowledge the help and support I have received from the following. Firstly, and most importantly my supervisor, Professor Kate Mcluskie, whose wise advice and constant encouragement kept me on track and enthusiastic throughout the research and writing up. I would like also to acknowledge the help and guidance received from my first supervisor Dr. Catherine Richardson, who was crucial in setting me off in the right direction. I thank the three actors, Don Carrier, Phil Corbitt and Patrice Naiambana, who most patiently and intelligently answered my questions, and a double thank you to the latter for his detailed and perceptive thoughts both before and after over two years in the role of Warwick. Members of the Shakespeare Institute library staff were consistently generous with their time and advice, as were the staff at both the Shakespeare Trust and the Warwick Record Office. Finally, I would like to thank my family and friends, all of whom have been very constructive and supportive in their comments. CONTENTS Dedication Acknowledgements Contents Introduction 1 – 18 Chapter One 19 – 62 Establishing the Reputation Chapter Two 63 – 109 Establishing Warwick in 1 and 2 Henry VI Chapter Three 110 – 153 Status through Metaphor Chapter Four 154 – 199 Kingmaking Chapter Five 200 – 244 ‘No more my king’ Chapter Six 245 – 280 Playing Warwick Conclusion 281 – 290 Bibliography 1 INTRODUCTION This thesis is concerned with the reputation and character of a single historical figure. My purpose is to advance the premise that recondite figures from history such as Richard Neville, Earl of Warwick (1428-1471) have been exposed and revitalised most enduringly through the dramatic language of Shakespeare, who through his linguistic arts in the Henry VI trilogy unravels a memorable version of the personality and character of Warwick. Shakespeare imprints on his audience the essence of the character through the poetic language of his drama. In his elegiac theme on the instability of human glory, Daniel Defoe (1661-1731) contemplates its transient nature. He muses on the utilitarian fate of great men, whose bones are ploughed up in the process of husbandry and their converted remains possibly recycled to the meanest use: All are vanished, and their very monuments are mouldered into earth, their dust is lost and their place knows them no more. They live only in the immortal writings of their historians and poets, the renowned flatterers of the age they lived in, and who have made us think of the persons, not as they really were, but as they were pleased to represent them.1 Defoe, in his impeccable style, has almost encapsulated my thesis. This debate is concerned with the legacy left by the personification of a specific historical character by a single dramatist. Shakespeare’s poetic creativity, in his dramatisation of such an eclectic mix of robust characters from history, continues to hold our attention, establishing them in our collective consciousness and ensuring their durability as cultural icons. 1 Daniel Defoe, ‘The Instability of Human Glory’ in Selected English Essays, ed. by W. Peacock (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1903), pp. 52-53. 2 I will argue that, in the case of Richard Neville, his reputation has withstood the rigours of time because it has been closely nurtured by Shakespeare, through his dramatic interpretation of the varied sources available to him, with their roots in fifteenth century accounts and commentaries. Warwick’s historical narrative, legend and mythology begin in the poetry, ballads and chronicles of late medieval times and continue in the chronicles and histories of the early modern period and their interpretation of the fifteenth century civil wars. They move through later centuries to the present, where they are examined in four distinct biographies, all notably bearing the same title.2 In the most recent by A.J. Pollard, Warwick’s familiar soubriquet ‘kingmaker’ is used as the main title, but is more explicit in its intentions with the addition of ‘Politics, Power and Fame’.3 Warwick retains a legendary status, but alongside his legend are also myths, which bulk up his reputation and make him an ideal subject for dramatic reconstruction. The modern historian Keith Dockray, who gives a detailed and informative résumé of the politics of the historiography of the Wars of the Roses and Shakespeare’s role in them, considers the dramatist ‘a curse’ for the historians of the Wars of the Roses, but also ‘a blessing’. The former because ‘…he immortalised Tudor spin on fifteenth century wars’, and the latter because the plays open to wider view, beyond the universities and élite schools, the whole sweep of the dynastic struggles of the period.4 2 Charles Oman, Warwick the Kingmaker (London, 1891); Paul Murray Kendal, Warwick the Kingmaker (London, 1973); Michael Hicks, Warwick the Kingmaker (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1998). 3 A.J. Pollard, Warwick the Kingmaker: Politics, Power and Fame (Hambledon Continuum, 2007). 4 Keith Dockray, William Shakespeare, The Wars of the Roses and the Historians (Tempus, 2002), p. 11. 3 Warwick’s own dramatic narrative becomes part of what Michael Hattaway describes as ‘the characteristics of Shakespeare’s histories’. He suggests that: Structurally, the plays are indeed various: the earliest, the plays about the reign of Henry VI, are chronicles of civil war, what Edward Hall called ‘intestine division’. Dramatising the events of this reign involved not only making sense of, and giving dramatic shape to, the chroniclers’ accounts of the Wars of the Roses between the Yorkists and Lancastrians, but relating the surges of national politics to the persistent conflict between England and France during the Hundred Years War.5 Shakespeare corporealised Warwick’s chronicled historical provenance in a set of dramatic conditions based on such written reports. There are no portraits, memorials, artefacts which provide additional or alternative evidence to confirm or deny his legend. The Warwickshire antiquarian John Rous (c.1411-1491) provided one of the only few surviving images of Warwick, a rough drawing in the margin of The Rous Roll in which he is portrayed in full armour, giving little away about his true appearance.6 However, the Victorian military historian Charles Oman concluded: At most we may gather from vague phrases of the chroniclers and from his quaint armed figure in the Rous Roll that he was of great stature and breadth of limb.7 The dramatist mediates between the legendary and the mythical to put together a character which explicates Warwick’s desire for renown: his manifest love of show, his seeking of popularity through largesse, and his maintenance of a martial reputation through physical feats of war. The soubriquet ‘kingmaker’ is a later accretion, and it is unverifiable whether it was known to Shakespeare in 1590; what is certain is that Warwick is unique in the Who’s Who of history to bear such an 5 Michael Hattaway, ‘The Shakespearean history play’, in Shakespeare’s History Plays, ed. by Michael Hathaway (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), p. 7. 6 John Rous, The Rous Roll, ed. by W.H. Courthope (London, 1859). 7 Oman, p. 2. 4 agnomen. There are scenes in Shakespeare’s Henry VI trilogy which are pivotal to the development of Warwick as a central character. Set out below, these scenes are both correlations with and conflations of historical events in which Warwick was involved: Play Scene Shakespeare’s Events in Warwick’s Historical date Setting narrative I Henry VI 2.4 Temple Garden, Plucking of the red and Inns of Court, white roses. Polarisation Fictitious London 1425 of politics. 2 Henry VI 2.2 Duke of York’s Duke’s canvassing of the 1452 garden Nevilles’ support 2 Henry VI 3.2 Bury St. Edmunds. Death of Humphrey Duke 23rd February 1447 1447 of Gloucester.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appeals to the Privy Council from the American Colonies: an Annotated
    Appeals to the Privy Council from the American Colonies: An Annotated Digital Catalogue: Part 1 compiled by: Sharon Hamby O’Connor and Mary Sarah Bilder with the assistance of: Charles Donahue, Jr. To search the database click here. See notes on searching the database. Access to the database is most easily obtained by using one of the search engines or clicking on one of the lists of contents given at the bottom of this page. There are many live links on this page (gray); they cannot be seen on some mobile devices but can be seen by hovering over them In the century before the creation of the Supreme Court of the United States, the British Privy Council heard appeals from the 13 colonies that became the United States and from the other ‘American’ colonies in Canada and the Caribbean. This catalogue focuses on all currently known colonial cases appealed to the Privy Council from the future United States, a number totaling nearly one-third of the more than 800 heard from the Americas. For the appeals from the 13 colonies, the catalogue provides links to original documents in England and the United States. Most significantly, the site includes images of surviving briefs filed in 54 of these appeals. Known as ‘printed cases’, these briefs provide the ‘reasons’ for the appeals. A preliminary catalogue of the appeals from Canada and from the Caribbean may be found in Part II of this website. Current complementary international projects address previously unpublished Privy Council cases from a somewhat later period and colonial appeals from India and Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Thames Valley Papists from Reformation to Emancipation 1534 - 1829
    Thames Valley Papists From Reformation to Emancipation 1534 - 1829 Tony Hadland Copyright © 1992 & 2004 by Tony Hadland All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form, or by any means – electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise – without prior permission in writing from the publisher and author. The moral right of Tony Hadland to be identified as author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN 0 9547547 0 0 First edition published as a hardback by Tony Hadland in 1992. This new edition published in soft cover in April 2004 by The Mapledurham 1997 Trust, Mapledurham HOUSE, Reading, RG4 7TR. Pre-press and design by Tony Hadland E-mail: [email protected] Printed by Antony Rowe Limited, 2 Whittle Drive, Highfield Industrial Estate, Eastbourne, East Sussex, BN23 6QT. E-mail: [email protected] While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, neither the author nor the publisher can be held responsible for any loss or inconvenience arising from errors contained in this work. Feedback from readers on points of accuracy will be welcomed and should be e-mailed to [email protected] or mailed to the author via the publisher. Front cover: Mapledurham House, front elevation. Back cover: Mapledurham House, as seen from the Thames. A high gable end, clad in reflective oyster shells, indicated a safe house for Catholics.
    [Show full text]
  • War of Roses: a House Divided
    Stanford Model United Nations Conference 2014 War of Roses: A House Divided Chairs: Teo Lamiot, Gabrielle Rhoades Assistant Chair: Alyssa Liew Crisis Director: Sofia Filippa Table of Contents Letters from the Chairs………………………………………………………………… 2 Letter from the Crisis Director………………………………………………………… 4 Introduction to the Committee…………………………………………………………. 5 History and Context……………………………………………………………………. 5 Characters……………………………………………………………………………….. 7 Topics on General Conference Agenda…………………………………..……………. 9 Family Tree ………………………………………………………………..……………. 12 Special Committee Rules……………………………………………………………….. 13 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………. 14 Letters from the Chairs Dear Delegates, My name is Gabrielle Rhoades, and it is my distinct pleasure to welcome you to the Stanford Model United Nations Conference (SMUNC) 2014 as members of the The Wars of the Roses: A House Divided Joint Crisis Committee! As your Wars of the Roses chairs, Teo Lamiot and I have been working hard with our crisis director, Sofia Filippa, and SMUNC Secretariat members to make this conference the best yet. If you have attended SMUNC before, I promise that this year will be even more full of surprise and intrigue than your last conference; if you are a newcomer, let me warn you of how intensely fun and challenging this conference will assuredly be. Regardless of how you arrive, you will all leave better delegates and hopefully with a reinvigorated love for Model UN. My own love for Model United Nations began when I co-chaired a committee for SMUNC (The Arab Spring), which was one of my very first experiences as a member of the Society for International Affairs at Stanford (the umbrella organization for the MUN team), and I thoroughly enjoyed it. Later that year, I joined the intercollegiate Model United Nations team.
    [Show full text]
  • The Armorial Windows of Woodhouse Chapel
    nf Jtrailli. WITH REFERENCES TO THE ARMORIAL SHIELDS IN WOODHOUSE CHAPEL. (N. stands for the North Windows, S.for the South, and E.for the East.) Maude Percy .tpJohn lord Neville.=y=Elizabeth Latimer. TI ——1 Margaret Staf-=i pRalph first Earl of=i =Joane Beau-= f=Robert Ferrers of Oversley. Thomas lord Furnival. John lord Latimer. ford. Westmerland. fort. (1st husb.) (page 327.) (page 327.) (Note, p. 327.) John lord Ealph Margaret lady Richard William lord Fauconberg. (N. 7.) KATHARINE DUCHESS OF NORFOLK. El zabeth lady Neville. Neville Sorope. (N. 11.) Earl of George lord Latimer. (N. 6.) (N. 3 and S. 2.) Greystock (p. 327.) ofOvers-Philippa lady Salisbury Robert bishop of Durham. (N. 8.) Alianor Countess of Northumber- (N. 9), and =f= ley. Dacre. (N. 12.) (N. 5.) Edward lord Abergavenny. land. (N. 8.) Mary lady Ne- I (S.I.) =f (p. 330.) Anne Duchess of Buckingham. (N.4.) villeofOvers- I ( Cecily Duchess of York. (p. 337.) ley. (p. 333.) ! 1 King Heniy= =Margaret Ralph 2d Earl of Sir John Sir Thomas ]EUchard Earl of Warwick Katharine= =Wiffiam lord Has­ VI. (E. 3.) of Anjon. Westmerland. Neville. Neville, and Salisbury. Neville. tings, (p. 339.) (E.4.) (N. 1.) (N. 10.) (p. 330.) I Edward Prince of Wales.=Anne Neville. Hastings Earl of Huntingdon. (Anns in the East Window.) THE ARMQRIAL WINDOWS OF WOODHOUSE CHAPEL. 317 MR. JOHN GOUGH NICHOLS, F.S.A., read a Paper on THE ARMORIAL WINDOWS erected in the reign of Henry VI. by John Viscount Beaumont and Katharine Duchess of Norfolk in WOODHOUSE CHAPEL, by the Park of Beaumanor, in Charnwood Forest, Leicestershire.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Newlin Addison Davis and Eliza Murray Drake
    Dr. Newlin Addison Davis and Eliza Murray Drake On March 1, 1842, at the Ebenezer Camp Meeting in Polk County in southwestern Missouri, twenty-one-year-old Newlin Addison Davis (1821– 1876) married fifteen-year-oldEliza Murray Drake (1826–1888). They were both born in Tennessee and had migrated with their families to Missouri. Family tradition states that Neville’s Davis heritage1 is derived from a family that came to America in the seventeenth century from Cardiff, Wales. Neville’s earliest recorded antecedent in the Davis line is her sixth great- grandfather David Davis (1702–1782), who lived in Town Fork Settlement2 near Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Town Fork Settlement (1763–99) in R adk Y Winston-Salem Raleigh Asheville N eu se R . Charlotte C ap e F ea A map of North Carolina r R. showing the location of Town Fork Settlement, where Neville’s Davis ancestors lived for thirty-six years in the latter part of In 1763 Morgan Davis (1735–1831), Neville’s fifth great-grandfather, married the eighteenth century. Sarah Reed (1742–1821), who descended from Sir Thomas Wyatt the Elder (1503–1542) and his son, Sir Thomas Wyatt the Younger (1521–1554), important figures in sixteenth-century English history.3 It is through the lineage of Sir Thomas Wyatt the Elder’s wife, Lady Elizabeth Brooke (1503–1560),4 that Neville is descended from early English royalty and nobility, back to William the Conqueror (1028–1087). Another of Sarah Reed’s antecedents was Dorothea Scott (1611–1688), a renowned Quaker preacher who had considerable interaction with notables of seventeenth-century England.5 The twice-widowed Dorothea emigrated from England to Oyster Bay in colonial New York in 1680 with her daughter, Dorothea Gotherson (1657–1709).
    [Show full text]
  • Play and No Work? a 'Ludistory' of the Curatorial As Transitional Object at the Early
    All Play and No Work? A ‘Ludistory’ of the Curatorial as Transitional Object at the Early ICA Ben Cranfield Tate Papers no.22 Using the idea of play to animate fragments from the archive of the Institute of Contemporary Arts, this paper draws upon notions of ‘ludistory’ and the ‘transitional object’ to argue that play is not just the opposite of adult work, but may instead be understood as a radical act of contemporary and contingent searching. It is impossible to examine changes in culture and its meaning in the post-war period without encountering the idea of play as an ideal mode and level of experience. From the publication in English of historian Johan Huizinga’s Homo Ludens in 1949 to the appearance of writer Richard Neville’s Play Power in 1970, play was used to signify an enduring and repressed part of human life that had the power to unite and oppose, nurture and destroy in equal measure.1 Play, as related by Huizinga to freedom, non- instrumentality and irrationality, resonated with the surrealist roots of the Institute of Contemporary Arts (ICA) in London and its attendant interest in the pre-conscious and unconscious.2 Although Huizinga and Neville did not believe play to be the exclusive preserve of childhood, a concern for child development and for the role of play in childhood grew in the post-war period. As historian Roy Kozlovsky has argued, the idea of play as an intrinsic and vital part of child development and as something that could be enhanced through policy making was enshrined within the 1959 Declaration of the
    [Show full text]
  • The CAMRA Regional Inventory for London Pub Interiors of Special Historic Interest Using the Regional Inventory
    C THE CAMPAIGN FOR REAL ALE The CAMRA Regional Inventory for London Pub Interiors of Special Historic Interest Using the Regional Inventory The information The Regional Inventory listings are found on pages 13–47, where the entries are arranged alphabetically by postal districts and, within these, by pub names. The exceptions are outer London districts which are listed towards the end. Key Listed status Statutory listing: whether a pub building is statutorily listed or not is spelled out, together with the grade at which it is listed LPA Local planning authority: giving the name of the London borough responsible for local planning and listed building matters ✩ National Inventory: pubs which are also on CAMRA’s National Inventory of Pub interiors of Outstanding Historic Interest Public transport London is well served by public transport and few of the pubs listed are far from a bus stop, Underground or rail station. The choice is often considerable and users will have no di≤culty in easily reaching almost every pub with the aid of a street map and a transport guide. A few cautionary words The sole concern of this Regional Inventory is with the internal historic fabric of pubs – not with qualities like their atmosphere, friendliness or availability of real ale that are featured in other CAMRA pub guides. Many Regional Inventory pubs are rich in these qualities too, of course, and most of them, but by no means all, serve real ale. But inclusion in this booklet is for a pub’s physical attributes only, and is not to be construed as a recommendation in any other sense.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ROSES ✥ 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 1 2 3 4 5 36 37 38X
    This content downloaded from 136.167.3.36 on Thu, 11 Jan 2018 18:42:15 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ✥ THE WARS OF THE ROSES ✥ 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 1 2 3 4 5 36 37 38x This content downloaded from 136.167.3.36 on Thu, 11 Jan 2018 18:42:15 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 THE WARS OF 8 9 ✥ ✥ 10 THE ROSES 1 2 3 MICHAEL HICKS 4 5 6 7 8 9 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 1 2 3 4 5 36 YALE UNIVERSITY PRESS 37 NEW HAVEN AND LONDON 38x This content downloaded from 136.167.3.36 on Thu, 11 Jan 2018 18:42:15 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Copyright © 2010 Michael Hicks 8 9 All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and 20 except by reviewers for the public press) without written permission from the publishers. 1 For information about this and other Yale University Press publications, please contact: 2 U.S. Office: [email protected] www.yalebooks.com 3 Europe Office: sales @yaleup.co.uk www.yaleup.co.uk 4 Set in Minion Pro by IDSUK (DataConnection) Ltd 5 Printed in Great Britain by TJ International Ltd, Padstow, Cornwall 6 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data 7 8 Hicks, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Shakespeare on Film, Video & Stage
    William Shakespeare on Film, Video and Stage Titles in bold red font with an asterisk (*) represent the crème de la crème – first choice titles in each category. These are the titles you’ll probably want to explore first. Titles in bold black font are the second- tier – outstanding films that are the next level of artistry and craftsmanship. Once you have experienced the top tier, these are where you should go next. They may not represent the highest achievement in each genre, but they are definitely a cut above the rest. Finally, the titles which are in a regular black font constitute the rest of the films within the genre. I would be the first to admit that some of these may actually be worthy of being “ranked” more highly, but it is a ridiculously subjective matter. Bibliography Shakespeare on Silent Film Robert Hamilton Ball, Theatre Arts Books, 1968. (Reissued by Routledge, 2016.) Shakespeare and the Film Roger Manvell, Praeger, 1971. Shakespeare on Film Jack J. Jorgens, Indiana University Press, 1977. Shakespeare on Television: An Anthology of Essays and Reviews J.C. Bulman, H.R. Coursen, eds., UPNE, 1988. The BBC Shakespeare Plays: Making the Televised Canon Susan Willis, The University of North Carolina Press, 1991. Shakespeare on Screen: An International Filmography and Videography Kenneth S. Rothwell, Neil Schuman Pub., 1991. Still in Movement: Shakespeare on Screen Lorne M. Buchman, Oxford University Press, 1991. Shakespeare Observed: Studies in Performance on Stage and Screen Samuel Crowl, Ohio University Press, 1992. Shakespeare and the Moving Image: The Plays on Film and Television Anthony Davies & Stanley Wells, eds., Cambridge University Press, 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • Fatal Colours—PKY—234X153mm FATALCPR01
    ORION FATALC Unit $$PR Page 1 Fatal Colours—PKY—234x153mm FATALCPR01 FATAL COLOURS Input Data Services Ltd 01-17-2011 10:38:36 ORION FATALC Unit $$PR Page 2 Fatal Colours—PKY—234x153mm FATALCPR01 Input Data Services Ltd 01-17-2011 10:38:36 ORION FATALC Unit $$PR Page 3 Fatal Colours—PKY—234x153mm FATALCPR01 FATAL COLOURS the battle of towton 1461 George Goodwin Weidenfeld & Nicolson london Input Data Services Ltd 01-17-2011 10:38:36 ORION FATALC Unit $$PR Page 4 Fatal Colours—PKY—234x153mm FATALCPR01 First published in Great Britain in 2011 by Weidenfeld & Nicolson 13579108642 Text © George Goodwin 2011 Maps © David Hoxley 2011 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of both the copyright owner and the above publisher. The right of George Goodwin to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act of 1988. A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. hb isbn-13 978 0 297 86071 6 Typset by Input Data Services Ltd, Bridgwater Somerset Printed and bound in the UK by CPI Mackays, Chatham, Kent The Orion Publishing Group’s policy is to use papers that are natural, renewable and recyclable products and made from wood grown in sustainable forests. The logging and manufacturing processes are expected to conform to the environmental regulations of the country of origin.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wars of the Roses: a Timeline of Key Events Edward III Reigns From
    The Wars of the Roses: A Timeline of Key Events . Edward III reigns from 1327 – 1377. Edward has many sons the heirs of which become the key players in the Wars of the Roses (see family tree). o Edward’s first son Edward (The Black Prince) dies in 1376. His son, Richard becomes Richard II following Edward III’s death and reigns from 1377 until 1399. o Edward’s third son Lionel also predeceases him. Lionel’s daughter, however, is integral to the claim made by The House of York to the throne at the time of the Wars of the Roses. Her granddaughter marries Richard, Duke of York who is the son of Edward III’s fifth son, Edmund, Duke of York. Their child Richard, 3rd Duke of York will eventually make a claim for the throne during the Wars of the Roses. o Edward’s fourth son John of Gaunt, Duke of Lancaster, founds The House of Lancaster. His son, Henry (Bolingbroke), overthrows Richard II to become Henry IV. The descendants of Henry IV are King Henry V and King Henry VI. The House of Lancaster therefore has an uninterrupted reign of 62 years. o Edward’s fifth son Edmund of Langley, Duke of York founds The House of York. His son Richard, 2nd Duke of York marries the great- granddaughter of Edward’s third son. 1377: Edward III dies, and Richard II, his grandson, becomes king. Richard II is overthrown by his cousin Henry Bolingbroke who becomes King Henry IV. 1413: Henry IV dies, and Henry V becomes king.
    [Show full text]
  • Biographical Appendix
    Biographical Appendix The following women are mentioned in the text and notes. Abney- Hastings, Flora. 1854–1887. Daughter of 1st Baron Donington and Edith Rawdon- Hastings, Countess of Loudon. Married Henry FitzAlan Howard, 15th Duke of Norfolk, 1877. Acheson, Theodosia. 1882–1977. Daughter of 4th Earl of Gosford and Louisa Montagu (daughter of 7th Duke of Manchester and Luise von Alten). Married Hon. Alexander Cadogan, son of 5th Earl of Cadogan, 1912. Her scrapbook of country house visits is in the British Library, Add. 75295. Alten, Luise von. 1832–1911. Daughter of Karl von Alten. Married William Montagu, 7th Duke of Manchester, 1852. Secondly, married Spencer Cavendish, 8th Duke of Devonshire, 1892. Grandmother of Alexandra, Mary, and Theodosia Acheson. Annesley, Katherine. c. 1700–1736. Daughter of 3rd Earl of Anglesey and Catherine Darnley (illegitimate daughter of James II and Catherine Sedley, Countess of Dorchester). Married William Phipps, 1718. Apsley, Isabella. Daughter of Sir Allen Apsley. Married Sir William Wentworth in the late seventeenth century. Arbuthnot, Caroline. b. c. 1802. Daughter of Rt. Hon. Charles Arbuthnot. Stepdaughter of Harriet Fane. She did not marry. Arbuthnot, Marcia. 1804–1878. Daughter of Rt. Hon. Charles Arbuthnot. Stepdaughter of Harriet Fane. Married William Cholmondeley, 3rd Marquess of Cholmondeley, 1825. Aston, Barbara. 1744–1786. Daughter and co- heir of 5th Lord Faston of Forfar. Married Hon. Henry Clifford, son of 3rd Baron Clifford of Chudleigh, 1762. Bannister, Henrietta. d. 1796. Daughter of John Bannister. She married Rev. Hon. Brownlow North, son of 1st Earl of Guilford, 1771. Bassett, Anne. Daughter of Sir John Bassett and Honor Grenville.
    [Show full text]