DOCSLIB.ORG

The Wars of the Roses: a Timeline of Key Events Edward III Reigns From

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Wars of the Roses: a Timeline of Key Events Edward III Reigns From The Wars of the Roses: A Timeline of Key Events . Edward III reigns from 1327 – 1377. Edward has many sons the heirs of which become the key players in the Wars of the Roses (see family tree). o Edward’s first son Edward (The Black Prince) dies in 1376. His son, Richard becomes Richard II following Edward III’s death and reigns from 1377 until 1399. o Edward’s third son Lionel also predeceases him. Lionel’s daughter, however, is integral to the claim made by The House of York to the throne at the time of the Wars of the Roses. Her granddaughter marries Richard, Duke of York who is the son of Edward III’s fifth son, Edmund, Duke of York. Their child Richard, 3rd Duke of York will eventually make a claim for the throne during the Wars of the Roses. o Edward’s fourth son John of Gaunt, Duke of Lancaster, founds The House of Lancaster. His son, Henry (Bolingbroke), overthrows Richard II to become Henry IV. The descendants of Henry IV are King Henry V and King Henry VI. The House of Lancaster therefore has an uninterrupted reign of 62 years. o Edward’s fifth son Edmund of Langley, Duke of York founds The House of York. His son Richard, 2nd Duke of York marries the great- granddaughter of Edward’s third son. 1377: Edward III dies, and Richard II, his grandson, becomes king. Richard II is overthrown by his cousin Henry Bolingbroke who becomes King Henry IV. 1413: Henry IV dies, and Henry V becomes king. Henry V begins a campaign of war on France in 1415. Following numerous victories the most famous of which was the battle of Agincourt he eventually negotiates a treaty with King Charles VI which sees him named as heir to France’s throne. At this time he also marries Charles VI’s daughter Catherine of Valois. The treaty ensures that when King Charles VI dies, Henry V will become king of both England and France. 1422: Henry V predeceases King Charles VI of France. He dies before he can finish his campaigns in France and seize the throne. He leaves a 9 month old son who is heir to the throne but too young to rule the country. Following Henry’s death a regency council was formed to govern until the young King Henry VI came of age to rule independently. Henry V’s brother John, Duke of Bedford is appointed as senior regent and put in charge of the ongoing wars in France. During his absence his younger brother Humphrey, Duke of Gloucester acts as Lord Protector of England. Following the Duke of Bedford’s death the Duke of Gloucester claims the Regency for himself despite disagreement from other members of the regency council. Henry VI grows up to be ill-suited to leadership and an inconsistent ruler. He is devoutly religious, timid and dislikes conflict. The conflict in France is a topic of great dispute within the regency council. Henry’s uncle the Duke of Gloucester and Richard, Duke of York argue for the continuation of the war but the Earl of Suffolk and the Earl of Somerset, who Henry is much influenced by, favour a policy of peaceful resolution. 1445: Persuaded by Suffolk and Somerset that it will lead to peace with France, Henry VI marries Margaret of Anjou the niece of France’s King Charles VII. Henry also agrees to return the lands of Maine and Anjou to the French as a condition of the marriage – a decision which greatly angers Gloucester and York and which is very unpopular with the citizens of England. 1447: Having made his anger and contempt for the marriage of Henry to Margaret known, the Duke of Gloucester is summoned before parliament on the charge of treason. He is arrested and placed in custody where he dies before facing trial. Richard, Duke of York who in the absence of a legitimate heir to the throne is now the presumptive heir is excluded from the court and given a role governing Ireland. Henry VI bestows dukedoms (usually reserved for peers of princely blood) on the Earls of Suffolk and Somerset, raising them above their station. The monarchy becomes increasingly unpopular due to Henry’s inability to govern effectively and his favouritism of certain lords over others. The Duke of York is persuaded to return to court and raises an army to eradicate the lords around Henry VI. He continually maintains he is loyal to the King, and is fighting the King’s manipulative advisers and Queen Margaret not Henry VI. 1453: Henry experiences a period of severe mental illness which leads to York being appointed as regent in 1454 but then fairly swiftly dismissed in 1455 when Henry recovers. At this time York makes two very influential allies in the Earls of Salisbury and Warwick. With the support of both earls and other noblemen who have become frustrated with Henry’s rule, York marches on London with the aim of ridding Henry of his disloyal advisors. This marks the beginning of the Wars of the Roses between the supporters of the House of Lancaster (Henry VI) and those of the House of York (Richard, Duke of York). 22 May 1455: The first significant conflict in the Wars of the Roses takes place at St. Albans. This is a Yorkist victory and the King is captured and escorted back to London. The Duke of York is re-appointed Lord Protector due to the King having suffered a further mental breakdown and a period of relative peace is established. York is dismissed again in 1456 when Henry VI has a lucid period. Queen Margaret fuels anti-Yorkist sentiment at court. York’s influence is undermined and he is excluded from the royal council. The country is now in a state of civil war. Several battles follow most notably the Battle of Blore Heath in 1459 and the Battle of Northampton in 1460 where King Henry is captured again and this time Margaret and her son Prince Edward flee to safety in Wales. Following the success at the Battle of Northampton, York returns to London and makes a claim to the throne asserting that his line of descent from Edward III is a stronger one than Henry’s. This is because his claim is through the third son, whereas Henry’s is by the fifth son of Edward III. Everyone, even those most loyal to York is shocked by his claim. After much deliberation over the validity of the claim in parliament, a compromise is reached and it is agreed that York will become Henry's successor, therefore disinheriting Henry’s son, Prince Edward. Margaret is furious at this turn of events and is determined to fight for her son’s claim to the throne. She begins mustering forces in Scotland, Wales and the Lancastrian heartlands to go to battle against York. Christmas 1460/1461: Battle of Wakefield. Richard of York is killed along with his ally Salisbury and York's second son, Edmund, Earl of Rutland. Margaret ordered the heads of all three placed on the gates of York. York’s first son Edward now becomes Duke of York and takes on the fight for the throne. 16th February 1461: 2nd Battle of St. Albans. The Lancastrian army beats Warwick and his Yorkist force, who are riding to meet Edward. Instead of marching on London to secure the tower after her victory, Queen Margaret hesitates, and thus wastes an opportunity to regain power. While she hesitates, Edward acts. He rides into London, is greeted like a king, and on the 4th March is proclaimed the increasingly popular King Edward IV. Now that he is King, Edward sets out to destroy the Lancastrians. 28th March, Palm Sunday 1461: Battle of Towton. To this day, the battle of Towton remains the largest battle (in terms of numbers) ever fought on British soil. To say it was bloody is an understatement; the river is said to have run red with blood. The Yorkists win. Margaret, Henry VI and their son flee to Scotland. King Edward IV reigns. For now. 28th June 1461: King Edward IV is crowned. July 1465: Henry VI is captured in the north of England and is brought to the Tower, where he lives a fairly comfortable existence; Margaret and Prince Edward have fled to France. Edward announces that he has secretly married Lady Elizabeth Grey widow of staunch Lancastrian Sir John Grey. Warwick is furious as he had plans for Edward to marry Lady Bona of Savoy, King Louis of France’s sister-in-law. Some suggest that Edward was at least engaged (if not married) before he married Elizabeth, to Lady Eleanor Butler, the Earl of Wiltshire’s daughter. This is important as it is this information that Richard, Duke of Gloucester uses to prove the illegitimacy of the princes in the tower in Richard III. Elizabeth is of far lower birth than Edward and her advancement to Queen of England as Edward’s wife angers the nobility. She begins to raise up her family through advantageous marriages to higher positions of nobility, which greatly upsets Warwick whose family is now being overlooked by King Edward. Warwick forms an alliance with Edward’s brother George, Duke of Clarence who is also frustrated by the advancement of Elizabeth’s family. Clarence marries Warwick’s eldest daughter Isabel Neville defying his brother’s orders against the marriage. Warwick and Clarence team up and make a plan to take the crown from Edward but after their attempts fail they are declared as traitors and driven out of England to France.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • War of Roses: a House Divided
    Stanford Model United Nations Conference 2014 War of Roses: A House Divided Chairs: Teo Lamiot, Gabrielle Rhoades Assistant Chair: Alyssa Liew Crisis Director: Sofia Filippa Table of Contents Letters from the Chairs………………………………………………………………… 2 Letter from the Crisis Director………………………………………………………… 4 Introduction to the Committee…………………………………………………………. 5 History and Context……………………………………………………………………. 5 Characters……………………………………………………………………………….. 7 Topics on General Conference Agenda…………………………………..……………. 9 Family Tree ………………………………………………………………..……………. 12 Special Committee Rules……………………………………………………………….. 13 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………. 14 Letters from the Chairs Dear Delegates, My name is Gabrielle Rhoades, and it is my distinct pleasure to welcome you to the Stanford Model United Nations Conference (SMUNC) 2014 as members of the The Wars of the Roses: A House Divided Joint Crisis Committee! As your Wars of the Roses chairs, Teo Lamiot and I have been working hard with our crisis director, Sofia Filippa, and SMUNC Secretariat members to make this conference the best yet. If you have attended SMUNC before, I promise that this year will be even more full of surprise and intrigue than your last conference; if you are a newcomer, let me warn you of how intensely fun and challenging this conference will assuredly be. Regardless of how you arrive, you will all leave better delegates and hopefully with a reinvigorated love for Model UN. My own love for Model United Nations began when I co-chaired a committee for SMUNC (The Arab Spring), which was one of my very first experiences as a member of the Society for International Affairs at Stanford (the umbrella organization for the MUN team), and I thoroughly enjoyed it. Later that year, I joined the intercollegiate Model United Nations team.
    [Show full text]
  • LORD BOLINGBROKE's THEORY of PARTY and OPPOSITION1 By
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by St Andrews Research Repository Max Skjönsberg, HJ, Oct 2015 LORD BOLINGBROKE’S THEORY OF PARTY AND OPPOSITION1 By MAX SKJÖNSBERG, London School of Economics and Political Science Abstract: Bolingbroke has been overlooked by intellectual historians in the last few decades, at least in comparison with ‘canonical’ thinkers. This article examines one of the most important but disputable aspects of his political thought: his views on political parties and his theory of opposition. It aims to demonstrate that Bolingbroke’s views on party have been misunderstood and that it is possible to think of him as an advocate of political parties rather than the ‘anti-party’ writer he is commonly known as. It has been suggested that Bolingbroke prescribed a state without political parties. By contrast, this article seeks to show that Bolingbroke was in fact the promoter of a very specific party, a systematic parliamentary opposition party in resistance to what he perceived as the Court Whig faction in power. It will 1 I have benefited from comments by Adrian Blau, Tim Hochstrasser, Paul Keenan, Robin Mills, and Paul Stock, as well as conversations with J. C. D. Clark, Richard Bourke, and Quentin Skinner at various stages of this project. As usual, however, the buck stops with the writer. I presented an earlier and shorter version of this article at the inaugural Early-Modern Intellectual History Postgraduate Conference at Newcastle University in June 2015. Eighteenth-century spelling has been kept in quotations throughout as have inconsistencies in spelling.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Assets Tyrley
    Loggerheads Parish Tyrley Ward Heritage Assets Tyrley Ward Tyrley A settlement recorded in the Domesday Survey of 1086 “lying within Hodnet Hundred (in Shropshire). William also holds Tyrley of the Earl Roger. Wulfric and Ravensward held it as two manors; they were free. One hide paying tax. There is land for two ploughs. There are four villagers and one slave with one plough. The value was 17 shillings and is now 20 shillings.” Recorded as a suspected lost village situated near the modern settlement of Hales by Bate and Palliser. No date of desertion is given. Jonathan Morris, in his book ‘The Shropshire Union Canal’ (1991), explains the origin of the name Tyrley. Tyrley Castle Farm is on the site of a Saxon castle which was built on a man-made mound in a field. The Saxon for mound is ‘tir’ and for field ‘ley’, hence Tirley which has become Tyrley Tyrley Wharf Page 68 Loggerheads Parish Tyrley Ward Heritage Assets Forming part of the Tyrley Conservation Area DC, The delightful collection of grade two listed buildings at Tyrley Wharf on the Shropshire Union Canal was constructed by the Peatswood Estate to coincide with the completion of the canal. There were originally seven individual cottages built to house estate workers and a stable to accommodate the horses used to tow canal barges. Constructed in brown brick with ashlar dressings, slate roof with coped verges on stone kneelers, multi-paned 2- light casements in plastered stone surrounds to first, second and fourth bays from left, blind round-headed brick opening to third; 3 lean-to timber porches on brick dwarf walls with slate roofs to front over cambered doorways with boarded doors; prominent paired and rebated ridge stack to left (shared between Nos.30 and 31) and taller ridge stack to right (to No.32).
    [Show full text]
  • The Flower of English Chivalry
    David Green. Edward the Black Prince: Power in Medieval Europe. Harlow: Pearson Longman, 2007. 312 pp. $28.00, paper, ISBN 978-0-582-78481-9. Reviewed by Stephen M. Cooper Published on H-War (January, 2008) In the city square of Leeds in West Yorkshire, the 1360s. He never became king of England, but there is a magnificent statue of the Black Prince, he was the sovereign ruler of a large part of erected in 1903 when the British Empire was at its France. The prince was a brilliant soldier and height and patriotism was uncomplicated. Dis‐ commander, but he was "not a political animal," playing an intense pride in his life and achieve‐ and there is a strong argument for saying that he ments, the inscription proclaims that the prince won the war but lost the peace because of his mis‐ was "the victor of Crécy and Poitiers, the Flower government of Aquitaine (p. 153). In pursuing his of English Chivalry and the Upholder of the Rights chosen themes, Green deliberately plays down the of the People in the Good Parliament." One would fighting, at which the prince was very good, and not expect a book published in 2007 to make the concentrates on the politics, where the prince was same grandiose claims, and David Green does not either rather hopeless or simply uninterested. In even intend his newest book Edward the Black terms of religion and estate management, there is Prince to be a conventional biography--he has no real evidence that "the Flower of English written one of those already (The Black Prince Chivalry" was even personally involved.
    [Show full text]
  • Shakespeare's
    Shakespeare’s Henry IV: s m a r t The Shadow of Succession SHARING MASTERWORKS OF ART April 2007 These study materials are produced for use with the AN EDUCATIONAL OUTREACH OF BOB JONES UNIVERSITY Classic Players production of Henry IV: The Shadow of Succession. The historical period The Shadow of Succession takes into account is 1402 to 1413. The plot focuses on the Prince of Wales’ preparation An Introduction to to assume the solemn responsibilities of kingship even while Henry IV regards his unruly son’s prospects for succession as disastrous. The Shadow of When the action of the play begins, the prince, also known as Hal, finds himself straddling two worlds: the cold, aristocratic world of his Succession father’s court, which he prefers to avoid, and the disreputable world of Falstaff, which offers him amusement and camaraderie. Like the plays from which it was adapted, The Shadow of Succession offers audiences a rich theatrical experience based on Shakespeare’s While Henry IV regards Falstaff with his circle of common laborers broad vision of characters, events and language. The play incorporates a and petty criminals as worthless, Hal observes as much human failure masterful blend of history and comedy, of heroism and horseplay, of the in the palace, where politics reign supreme, as in the Boar’s Head serious and the farcical. Tavern. Introduction, from page 1 Like Hotspur, Falstaff lacks the self-control necessary to be a produc- tive member of society. After surviving at Shrewsbury, he continues to Grieved over his son’s absence from court at a time of political turmoil, squander his time in childish pleasures.
    [Show full text]
  • History- Year 8 – the War of the Roses Time to Complete: 50 Minutes
    HOME LEARNING Subject: History- Year 8 – The War of the Roses Time to complete: 50 minutes Learning Objective: To find information about the War of the Roses using a timeline. Investigate the lives of kings Henry VI and Edward IV. TASK 1: Read the information on War of the Roses. Task 2: Match each date to the King who was ruling at that time (Use the information in the timeline to help you). TASK 3: Read the information about Henry VI and Edward IV and the Battle of Towton and fill in the correct details about each king. Task 4: Watch the video clip of “Horrible Histories” showing the War of the Roses. Save your work: If you are using a computer, open a blank document to do your work (you can use Word or Publisher). Don’t forget to SAVE it with your name, the lesson you are doing and the date. For example: T.Smith Maths 8 April If you would like us to see or mark your work please email it or send a photo of your completed work to the member of staff. [email protected] TASK 1 – Read the following information about the War of the Roses THE WAR OF THE ROSES The War of the Roses was a difficult time for England. During this time 2 rich and powerful families both wanted to rule England. They had many battles against each other to try to take the crown (become King). The families were the House of Lancaster and the House of York.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ROSES ✥ 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 1 2 3 4 5 36 37 38X
    This content downloaded from 136.167.3.36 on Thu, 11 Jan 2018 18:42:15 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ✥ THE WARS OF THE ROSES ✥ 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 1 2 3 4 5 36 37 38x This content downloaded from 136.167.3.36 on Thu, 11 Jan 2018 18:42:15 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 THE WARS OF 8 9 ✥ ✥ 10 THE ROSES 1 2 3 MICHAEL HICKS 4 5 6 7 8 9 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 1 2 3 4 5 36 YALE UNIVERSITY PRESS 37 NEW HAVEN AND LONDON 38x This content downloaded from 136.167.3.36 on Thu, 11 Jan 2018 18:42:15 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Copyright © 2010 Michael Hicks 8 9 All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and 20 except by reviewers for the public press) without written permission from the publishers. 1 For information about this and other Yale University Press publications, please contact: 2 U.S. Office: [email protected] www.yalebooks.com 3 Europe Office: sales @yaleup.co.uk www.yaleup.co.uk 4 Set in Minion Pro by IDSUK (DataConnection) Ltd 5 Printed in Great Britain by TJ International Ltd, Padstow, Cornwall 6 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data 7 8 Hicks, M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cold War • Read the Pages of the Text Book in the Following Pages
    Additional History Transition Work - The Cold War • Read the pages of the text book in the following pages. • Using this information, write an answer to the following question: “Why did the Grand Alliance Break down?” In your answer, you must: • Explain what the Grand Alliance was • Assess how much longer-term factors led to the collapse of the Grand Alliance (e.g. their different ideologies) • Assess how much shorter-term factors led to the collapse of the Grand Alliance (e.g. decisions about Europe towards the end of World War Two and immediately after) • Conclusion: What do you think was the main cause of the Grand Alliance’s collapse? Remember to include lots of factual evidence Additional History Transition Work - The Tudors Step 1: Make a chronological list of all the people in the family tree who were monarchs and the dates they reigned. Make sure to write which house they belonged to. (be careful… some are king more than once) Step 2: Read the article on the following page called, “The Wars of the Roses” by History.com editors. Step 3: Using your knowledge from the article and your own research, annotate the family tree including description of events that included different people. Step 4: Answer the following questions in detail. Q1. What caused the Wars of the Roses? Q2. What role did the nobility play within the Wars of the Roses? (Nobles that are mentioned in the article are: the Earl of Somerset, the Earl of Warwick, Lord Salisbury, Lord Audley) (Thinking points: how much power did they have? How much did the leaders on both sides rely on them? How trustworthy were they?) Q3.
    [Show full text]
  • Battles and Warfare
    BATTLES AND WARFARE GENERAL Le Jeu de la Hache: A Fifteenth-century Treatise on the Technique of Chivalric Axe Combat ANGLO Sydney Description: From Archaeologia, Vol. 109 Date of publication: 1991 Synopsis: Text and commentary on Le Jeu de la Hache (Bibliothèque Nationale, manuscrit français 1996), the only surviving treatise devoted exclusively to medieval axe combat. [LIBRARY NOTE: Filed under Fine and Applied Arts] The Times Guide to Battlefields of Britain ANON Description: From The Times Dates of publication: 3rd & 4th August, 1994 Synopsis: Articles on some of the battles included in English Heritage’s official new battlefields list (The Complete Guide to the Battlefields of Britain by David Smurthwaite), viz. Bannockburn, Shrewsbury, Blore Heath, Tewkesbury and Bosworth. The Wars of the Roses ANON Description: From Military History Monthly, Issue 50 Date of publication: November 2014 Synopsis: Well illustrated twenty-page editorial feature on the English civil conflicts of the fifteenth century. Includes an overview of the dynastic struggles and military campaigns, a discussion of military equipment and tactics, a longer feature on the Battle of Barnet and a brief revisionist analysis of Richard III. The strongest sections are those dealing with military matters. The brief historical explanations are, however, generally reliable, the most obvious error being the inclusion of a portrait of Elizabeth of York labelled ‘Elizabeth Woodville, Edward’s queen.’ The Wars of the Roses 1455-87 COATES Dr. J. I. Description: Typescript Date of publication: N/A Synopsis: Outline of the causes and main events of the wars. Heraldic Banners of the Wars of the Roses: Counties of Anglesey to Hampshire COVENEY Thomas Description: Freezywater Publications booklet, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • MA Dissertatio
    Durham E-Theses Northumberland at War BROAD, WILLIAM,ERNEST How to cite: BROAD, WILLIAM,ERNEST (2016) Northumberland at War, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/11494/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk ABSTRACT W.E.L. Broad: ‘Northumberland at War’. At the Battle of Towton in 1461 the Lancastrian forces of Henry VI were defeated by the Yorkist forces of Edward IV. However Henry VI, with his wife, son and a few knights, fled north and found sanctuary in Scotland, where, in exchange for the town of Berwick, the Scots granted them finance, housing and troops. Henry was therefore able to maintain a presence in Northumberland and his supporters were able to claim that he was in fact as well as in theory sovereign resident in Northumberland.
    [Show full text]
  • Play Book • December 2013
    Living Play Book • December 2013 PLAY BOOK Table of Contents PB 1.0 Optional Rules ....................................................... 2 PB 5.0 Example of Play .................................................. 13 PB 2.0 Game Setup ........................................................... 4 PB 6.0 Historical Notes ................................................... 19 PB 3.0 Scenarios ............................................................... 4 PB 7.0 Expanded Sequence of Play ................................ 28 PB 4.0 Designer Notes .................................................... 11 This is the “Living Play Book” document for the game. It includes errata and clarifications to the original rules. To aid readability, errata is indicated in blue text. GMT Games, LLC • P.O. Box 1308, Hanford, CA 93232-1308 www.GMTGames.com 2 CROWN OF ROSES Play Book Example: On Turn 3, March is the Senior York Heir, but Rivers is currently not controlled by York; though York has influence placed on him, as well as Warwick. As such, York loses one Popular Support at the beginning of the King Phase but the IPs placed on Warwick are subject to no negative modifier. On Turn 4, assuming Rivers is still controlled by York, York will have to place at least one (1) IP on Warwick or lose him during the Parliament Phase (3 pro-York Roses – 4 [Game Turn] equals negative 1). PB 1.3 Distrustful Margaret Rule (Historical Rule) Queen Margaret was very distrustful of Henry Holland, the Duke of Exeter (Exeter Block), especially early in the conflict, as Exeter was Henry VI’s immediate Heir at the time. Because of this mistrust (which turned out to be misplaced), Exeter can- not Lead any non-Office Blocks for Movement or Combat while Margaret is In-Play in England (i.e., not in Exile).
    [Show full text]
  • Court Chivalry and Politics: Nominations and Elections to the Order of the Garter: 1461-83
    COURT CHIVALRY AND POLITICS: NOMINATIONS AND ELECTIONS TO THE ORDER OF THE GARTER: 1461-83 A Ph.D. Dissertation By T. Tolga GUMUS THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BİLKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA APRIL 2007 To Ekrem, Taskin, Ovgu and Orkun COURT CHIVALRY AND POLITICS: NOMINATIONS AND ELECTIONS TO THE ORDER OF THE GARTER: 1461-83 The Institute of Economics and Social Sciences of Bilkent University By T. Tolga GUMUS In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BİLKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA APRIL 2007 I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. --------------------------------- Assist. Prof. David E. Thornton Supervisor I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. --------------------------------- Assist. Prof. Paul Latimer Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. --------------------------------- Assist. Prof. Edward Kohn Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. --------------------------------- Assist. Prof. Julian Bennett Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History.
    [Show full text]