DOCSLIB.ORG

Court Chivalry and Politics: Nominations and Elections to the Order of the Garter: 1461-83

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Court Chivalry and Politics: Nominations and Elections to the Order of the Garter: 1461-83 COURT CHIVALRY AND POLITICS: NOMINATIONS AND ELECTIONS TO THE ORDER OF THE GARTER: 1461-83 A Ph.D. Dissertation By T. Tolga GUMUS THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BİLKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA APRIL 2007 To Ekrem, Taskin, Ovgu and Orkun COURT CHIVALRY AND POLITICS: NOMINATIONS AND ELECTIONS TO THE ORDER OF THE GARTER: 1461-83 The Institute of Economics and Social Sciences of Bilkent University By T. Tolga GUMUS In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BİLKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA APRIL 2007 I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. --------------------------------- Assist. Prof. David E. Thornton Supervisor I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. --------------------------------- Assist. Prof. Paul Latimer Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. --------------------------------- Assist. Prof. Edward Kohn Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. --------------------------------- Assist. Prof. Julian Bennett Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. --------------------------------- Assoc. Prof. Gümeç Karamuk Examining Committee Member Approval of the Institute of Economics and Social Sciences --------------------------------- Prof. Erdal Erel Director ABSTRACT Court, Chivalry and Politics: Nominations and Elections to the Order of the Garter: 1461-83 Gümüş, Tarık Tolga Department of History Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. David E. Thornton April 2007 This thesis discusses the probable causes behind the nominations and elections of the knights to the Order of the Garter during the reigns of Henry VI, Edward IV and Richard III. The Study argues that various considerations played role in the nominations of particular knights by different companions. The main concern of the Kings and the knights of the Order was the politics of the time in nominating a knight to the Order. Parental closeness and previous military success of the knight- candidates were also important in their decisions. This thesis also suggests that while Anstis’s edition of Liber Niger is constantly used by the historians as the main primary source for the Order, another important register, the so-called French Register must be also taken into account when constructing Order’s history. Chapter 1 is a general introduction to the history of the order, Chapter 2 discusses the main problems of the primary sources of the Order, Chapter 3 discusses the causes of the nominations and elections of the knights in Henry VI’s time, Chapter IV discusses the causes of the nominations and elections of the knights during Edward IV and Richard III’s time. Chapter V is conclusion. Keywords: Chivalry, England, Order of the Garter. iii ÖZET Dizbağı Şovalyeliğine Adaylık ve Seçilme 1461-83 Gümüş, Tarık Tolga Department of History Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. David E. Thornton April 2007 Bu çalışma VI. Henry IV. Edward ve III. Richard döneminde Dizbağı Şovalyeliğine aday gösterilen ve/veya seçilen şovalyelerin diğer üyeler tarafından aday gösterilmelerinin ve krallar tarafından seçilmelerinin ardında yatan nedenleri incelemektedir. Dönemin özel politik durumu, şovalyelerin birbirleriyle olan özel ve ailesel yakınlıkları, şovalyelerin geçmiş savaş kariyerlerindeki başarıları şeçilmeleri ve aday gösterilmeleri için en önemli nedenlerdir. Bu tez ayrıca bu zamana kadar tarihçiler için temel kaynak olarak kabul edilen Anstis in edisyonu Liber Niger in sağladığı bilginlerin zaman zaman yanlış olabileceği ve French Register isimli alernatif kaynağında da bundan sonraki Dizbağı şovalyeliği çalışmalarında dikkate alınması gerektiğini iddia etmektedir. Birinci ünite Dizbağı şovalyeliği tarihine kısa bir bakıştır. İkinci ünite tarihsel kaynak sorununu işlemektedir. Üçüncü ünite VI. Henry dönemindeki aday gösterilme ve seçilme nedenlerini işlemektedir. Dördüncü ünite IV. Edward ve III. Richard dönemindeki aday gösterilme ve seçilme nedenlerini işlemektedir son ünite sonuçtur. Anahtar Kelimeler: Şovalyelik İngiltere Dizbağı Şovalyeliği. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to acknowledge David E. Thornton, Paul Latimer and Lisa Jefferson for their precious comments and suggestions for this study. I also owe special thanks to Catherine Keats-Rohan from Oxford University, Linacre College, unit for Prosopographical Research, and Eleanor Crancknell, Asistant Archivist in St. George Chapel and Chapter Library in Windsor. I would also like to thank to Nimet Kaya. All errors are mine. v TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................... iii ÖZET ................................................................................................................................. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................. v CHAPTER I: GENERAL INTRODUCTION .................................................................... 1 I.1 Historical Background: .............................................................................................. 5 I.2 A Brief Outline of The Order of the Garter and its History: ................................... 12 I.3 Nomination Process: ................................................................................................ 18 I.4 Previous Studies of the Order of the Garter ............................................................. 23 CHAPTER II: EVALUATION OF THE PRIMARY SOURCES .................................... 34 II.1 The Registers of The Order of the Garter, 1422-85 ............................................... 38 II.2 The Types of Differences: ...................................................................................... 42 II.2.1 Ashmole 1128 and Liber Niger Compared: .................................................... 42 II.3 Edward IV .............................................................................................................. 60 II.3.1 Differences of Names in the Scrutinies: .......................................................... 60 CHAPTER III: NOMINATIONS AND ELECTIONS TO THE ORDER OF THE GARTER DURING THE REIGN OF HENRY VI .......................................................... 68 III.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 68 CHAPTER IV: THE ELECTIONS AND NOMINATIONS DURING THE REIGN OF EDWARD IV ............................................................................................................ 127 IV.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 127 IV.2 The First Reign of Edward IV ............................................................................ 128 vi IV.3 Edward’s Second Reign ...................................................................................... 138 CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION ....................................................................................... 217 BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................... 225 APPENDIX: NOMINATIONS TO THE ORDER ......................................................... 240 vii CHAPTER I GENERAL INTRODUCTION The history of the Order of the Garter as well as its institutional structure has long been a topic of concern for historians. Nevertheless, recent scholarship especially in the medieval history of the fraternity has remained largely focused on explaining the politics behind the Order such as the sovereign’s motives for electing individual knight-companions, and the changing nature of the Order due to the character of the kings and their attitudes to the English nobility. However individual knight- companion’s regard of the nobility has been neglected; a detailed analysis of the process of nomination is thus still missing. This study aims to reverse this neglect: thus instead of the king’s purpose in choosing particular knights, it focuses on an analysis of the companions’ motives for nominating individual knights. By doing so, a fuller understanding of the inner dynamics of the Order and of the English peerage may be acquired. Probable repeating nomination patterns are classified during the reigns of Henry VI and Edward IV and change of attitudes between members in nominating new nominees are compared. Hence my focus will be on the possible changes originating from the differing attitudes of individual knights instead of the character of kings. 1 After giving a brief account of the Order and a survey of the former historiography in the Garter studies in the first chapter, the second chapter will analyze the problem(s) of Order’s own sources, which is to-date a neglected topic. Sometimes the differences between the Order’s registers are significant thus necessitating an elaborate analysis of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Anne Mowbray
    Anne Mowbray PHILOMENA JONES ‘ ON THURSDAY by ten of the clock before noon my young lady was christened and named Anne.’ Thus wrote John Paston the younger to Sir John Paston on the 18th December, 1472.1 She had been born 8 days earlier on Thursday, December 10th, at Framlingham Castle, Suffolk, the firstborn child of John Mowbray, fourth Duke of Norfolk, and his wife Elizabeth Talbot. 0n the 16th January, 1476, within a few weeks of Anne’s third birthday, her father died leaving her as his sole heiress. Ten days later it was already known that King Edward IV was seeking the hand of the young heiress for his younger son Richard, Duke of York.2 Lady Anne became a ward of the Crown and by August 1476 her lands were in the King’s hands and he was involving himself in their running. On the 2nd August, 1476, he confirmed a grant made by the late Duke of Norfolk to Laurence Fayreclough, esquire, Marshall of the Kings Hall of custody of the manors of Fenystanton and Hylton in Huntingdonshire and the park of Weston Baldock, Hertfordshjre.a In December of the same year he granted to Ralph Grenned, Clerk of the King’s kitchen, the office of the Feodary of the Duke of Norfolk’s estates in Surrey and Sussex, and to Robert Wingfield, knight, Controller of the Household the office of Steward of the Mowbray estates in Norfolk and Suffolk.4 Meanwhile negotiations between the King and the Duchess of Norfolk were proceeding. 0n the 12th June, 1476, the King granted his son Richard the title of Earl of Nottingham which had formerly been held by the Duke of Norfolk.
    [Show full text]
  • Norman Rule Cumbria 1 0
    NORMAN RULE I N C U M B R I A 1 0 9 2 – 1 1 3 6 B y RICHARD SHARPE A lecture delivered to Cumberland and Westmorland Antiquarian and Archaeological Society on 9th April 2005 at Carlisle CUMBERLAND AND WESTMORLAND ANTIQUARIAN AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY N O R M A N R U L E I N C U M B R I A 1 0 9 2 – 1 1 3 6 NORMAN RULE I N C U M B R I A 1 0 9 2 – 1 1 3 6 B y RICHARD SHARPE Pr o f essor of Diplomat i c , U n i v e r sity of Oxfo r d President of the Surtees Society A lecture delivered to Cumberland and Westmorland Antiquarian and Archaeological Society on 9th April 2005 at Carlisle CUMBERLAND AND WESTMORLAND ANTIQUARIAN AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY Tract Series Vol. XXI C&W TRACT SERIES No. XXI ISBN 1 873124 43 0 Published 2006 Acknowledgements I am grateful to the Council of the Society for inviting me, as president of the Surtees Society, to address the Annual General Meeting in Carlisle on 9 April 2005. Several of those who heard the paper on that occasion have also read the full text and allowed me to benefit from their comments; my thanks to Keith Stringer, John Todd, and Angus Winchester. I am particularly indebted to Hugh Doherty for much discussion during the preparation of this paper and for several references that I should otherwise have missed. In particular he should be credited with rediscovering the writ-charter of Henry I cited in n.
    [Show full text]
  • 'All Wemen in Thar Degree Shuld to Thar Men Subiectit Be': the Controversial Court Career of Elisabeth Parr, Marchioness Of
    ‘All wemen in thar degree shuld to thar men subiectit be’: The controversial court career of Elisabeth Parr, marchioness of Northampton, c. 1547-1565 Helen Joanne Graham-Matheson, BA, MA. Thesis submitted to UCL for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1 Declaration I, Helen Joanne Graham-Matheson confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 2 Abstract This thesis reconstructs and analyses the life and agency of Elisabeth Parr, marchioness of Northampton (1526-1565), with the aim of increasing understanding of women’s networks of influence and political engagement at the mid-Tudor courts, c. 1547- 1565. Analysis of Elisabeth’s life highlights that in the absence of a Queen consort the noblewomen of the Edwardian court maintained and utilized access to those in power and those with political significance and authority. During the reign of Mary Tudor, Elisabeth worked with her natal family to undermine Mary’s Queenship and support Elizabeth Tudor, particularly by providing her with foreign intelligence. At the Elizabethan court Elisabeth regained her title (lost under Mary I) and occupied a position as one of the Queen’s most trusted confidantes and influential associates. Her agency merited attention from ambassadors and noblemen as well as from the Emperor Maximilian and King Erik of Sweden, due to the significant role she played in several major contemporary events, such as Elizabeth’s early marriage negotiations. This research is interdisciplinary, incorporating early modern social, political and cultural historiographies, gender studies, social anthropology, sociology and the study of early modern literature.
    [Show full text]
  • THE RICHARD Illand YORKISTHISTORY TRUST
    I Index to Persons, Places and Subjects Rulers and their consorts are entered under their Chxistian names. Royal peers are under their title, non-royal members of the peerage and the episcopate under their family names, with cross references from their titles and sees. Page numbers for illustrations are in italics. Abergavenny, Lord we Neville, Bavaria, Blanche of Lancaster, Edward. Duchess of, 95. administration, knights’ role, 101. Bavaria, Louis of the Palatine, Duke alchemy, popularity, 100, 102. of, 95. Alcock, John, Bishop of Worcester, Beauchamp, Elizabeth, Lady Ladmer, 43, 45. 123. Aleyn,_]ohn, moneyet, 61, 62, 63. Beauchamp, Henry, Earl of Warwick, Alyngton, William, 33. 35. Anne Boleyn, queen of Henry VIII, Beauchamp, John, Lord Beauchamp 98. ofPowick,74. Anne Neville, queen of Richard III, Beauchamp, Margaret, Countess of 56. Shrewsbury Annesley, Sir Hugh, 111. property, 119. apprenu'ceship,records, 47. seal, 128, 132. Arthur, Prince of Wales, 92. Beauchamp, Richard, Bishop of Anmdel, Constance d’, Countess of Salisbury, 75. Amndel, 96. Beauchamp, Richard, Earl of Amndel,john (1’, Earl of Amndel, 96. Warwick, 19. Anmdel, Earl of :22 Fitzalan, Thomas; Beauchamp, Richard (son of Lord Fitzalan, William. Beauchamp of Powick), 74. Arundel, John, Bishop of Chichestet, Beaufort, Edmund, Duke of Somerset, 76. 20, 70, 80. Ashton, SirJohn, knight, 102. Beaufort family, genes, 4, 8, 9. Ashton, Six Thomas, 100, 102. Beaufort, Henry, Cardinal, Bishop of Askell, Sir Thomas, 122, 124. Wmchcster, 9, 19. Audley, Lord .ree Tuchet, John. Beaufort, Henry, Duke of Somerset, Bangor, Bishop of .ree Edenham, 16. Thomas. Beaufort, Joan, Countess of Barre,_]ane,Lady Catesby, 123.
    [Show full text]
  • Establishing the Tudor Dynasty: the Role of Francesco Piccolomini in Rome As First Cardinal Protector of England
    2017 IV Establishing the Tudor Dynasty: The Role of Francesco Piccolomini in Rome as First Cardinal Protector of England Susan May Article: Establishing the Tudor Dynasty: The Role of Francesco Piccolomini in Rome as First Cardinal Protector of England Establishing the Tudor Dynasty: The Role of Francesco Piccolomini in Rome as First Cardinal Protector of England1 Susan May Abstract: Between 1492 and 1503, Francesco Todeschini Piccolomini (1439–1503) was the first officially appointed Cardinal Protector of England. This paper focuses on a select few of his activities executed in that capacity for Henry Tudor, King Henry VII. Drawing particularly on two unpublished letters, it underscores the importance for King Henry of having his most trusted supporters translated to significant bishoprics throughout the land, particularly in the northern counties, and explores Queen Elizabeth of York’s patronage of the hospital and church of St Katharine-by-the-Tower in London. It further considers the mechanisms through which artists and humanists could be introduced to the Tudor court, namely via the communication and diplomatic infrastructure of Italian merchant-bankers. This study speculates whether, by the end of his long incumbency of forty-three years at the Sacred College, uncomfortably mindful of the extent of a cardinal’s actual and potential influence in temporal affairs, Piccolomini finally became reluctant to wield the power of the purple. Keywords: Francesco Todeschini Piccolomini; Henry VII; early Tudor; cardinal protector; St Katharine’s; Italian merchant-bankers ope for only twenty-six days following his election, taking the name of Pius III (Fig. 1), Francesco Todeschini Piccolomini (1439–1503) has understandably been P overshadowed in reputation by his high-profile uncle, Aeneas Silvius Piccolomini, Pope Pius II (1458–64).
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Assets Tyrley
    Loggerheads Parish Tyrley Ward Heritage Assets Tyrley Ward Tyrley A settlement recorded in the Domesday Survey of 1086 “lying within Hodnet Hundred (in Shropshire). William also holds Tyrley of the Earl Roger. Wulfric and Ravensward held it as two manors; they were free. One hide paying tax. There is land for two ploughs. There are four villagers and one slave with one plough. The value was 17 shillings and is now 20 shillings.” Recorded as a suspected lost village situated near the modern settlement of Hales by Bate and Palliser. No date of desertion is given. Jonathan Morris, in his book ‘The Shropshire Union Canal’ (1991), explains the origin of the name Tyrley. Tyrley Castle Farm is on the site of a Saxon castle which was built on a man-made mound in a field. The Saxon for mound is ‘tir’ and for field ‘ley’, hence Tirley which has become Tyrley Tyrley Wharf Page 68 Loggerheads Parish Tyrley Ward Heritage Assets Forming part of the Tyrley Conservation Area DC, The delightful collection of grade two listed buildings at Tyrley Wharf on the Shropshire Union Canal was constructed by the Peatswood Estate to coincide with the completion of the canal. There were originally seven individual cottages built to house estate workers and a stable to accommodate the horses used to tow canal barges. Constructed in brown brick with ashlar dressings, slate roof with coped verges on stone kneelers, multi-paned 2- light casements in plastered stone surrounds to first, second and fourth bays from left, blind round-headed brick opening to third; 3 lean-to timber porches on brick dwarf walls with slate roofs to front over cambered doorways with boarded doors; prominent paired and rebated ridge stack to left (shared between Nos.30 and 31) and taller ridge stack to right (to No.32).
    [Show full text]
  • Speakers of the House of Commons
    Parliamentary Information List BRIEFING PAPER 04637a 21 August 2015 Speakers of the House of Commons Speaker Date Constituency Notes Peter de Montfort 1258 − William Trussell 1327 − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Styled 'Procurator' Henry Beaumont 1332 (Mar) − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Sir Geoffrey Le Scrope 1332 (Sep) − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Probably Chief Justice. William Trussell 1340 − William Trussell 1343 − Appeared for the Commons alone. William de Thorpe 1347-1348 − Probably Chief Justice. Baron of the Exchequer, 1352. William de Shareshull 1351-1352 − Probably Chief Justice. Sir Henry Green 1361-1363¹ − Doubtful if he acted as Speaker. All of the above were Presiding Officers rather than Speakers Sir Peter de la Mare 1376 − Sir Thomas Hungerford 1377 (Jan-Mar) Wiltshire The first to be designated Speaker. Sir Peter de la Mare 1377 (Oct-Nov) Herefordshire Sir James Pickering 1378 (Oct-Nov) Westmorland Sir John Guildesborough 1380 Essex Sir Richard Waldegrave 1381-1382 Suffolk Sir James Pickering 1383-1390 Yorkshire During these years the records are defective and this Speaker's service might not have been unbroken. Sir John Bussy 1394-1398 Lincolnshire Beheaded 1399 Sir John Cheyne 1399 (Oct) Gloucestershire Resigned after only two days in office. John Dorewood 1399 (Oct-Nov) Essex Possibly the first lawyer to become Speaker. Sir Arnold Savage 1401(Jan-Mar) Kent Sir Henry Redford 1402 (Oct-Nov) Lincolnshire Sir Arnold Savage 1404 (Jan-Apr) Kent Sir William Sturmy 1404 (Oct-Nov) Devonshire Or Esturmy Sir John Tiptoft 1406 Huntingdonshire Created Baron Tiptoft, 1426.
    [Show full text]
  • Bills of Attainder
    University at Buffalo School of Law Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship Winter 2016 Bills of Attainder Matthew Steilen University at Buffalo School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles Part of the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation Matthew Steilen, Bills of Attainder, 53 Hous. L. Rev. 767 (2016). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles/123 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLE BILLS OF ATTAINDER Matthew Steilen* ABSTRACT What are bills of attainder? The traditional view is that bills of attainder are legislation that punishes an individual without judicial process. The Bill of Attainder Clause in Article I, Section 9 prohibits the Congress from passing such bills. But what about the President? The traditional view would seem to rule out application of the Clause to the President (acting without Congress) and to executive agencies, since neither passes bills. This Article aims to bring historical evidence to bear on the question of the scope of the Bill of Attainder Clause. The argument of the Article is that bills of attainder are best understood as a summary form of legal process, rather than a legislative act. This argument is based on a detailed historical reconstruction of English and early American practices, beginning with a study of the medieval Parliament rolls, year books, and other late medieval English texts, and early modern parliamentary diaries and journals covering the attainders of Elizabeth Barton under Henry VIII and Thomas Wentworth, earl of Strafford, under Charles I.
    [Show full text]
  • Stapylton Final Version
    1 THE PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE OF FREEDOM FROM ARREST, 1603–1629 Keith A. T. Stapylton UCL Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2016 Page 2 DECLARATION I, Keith Anthony Thomas Stapylton, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Signed Page 3 ABSTRACT This thesis considers the English parliamentary privilege of freedom from arrest (and other legal processes), 1603-1629. Although it is under-represented in the historiography, the early Stuart Commons cherished this particular privilege as much as they valued freedom of speech. Previously one of the privileges requested from the monarch at the start of a parliament, by the seventeenth century freedom from arrest was increasingly claimed as an ‘ancient’, ‘undoubted’ right that secured the attendance of members, and safeguarded their honour, dignity, property, and ‘necessary’ servants. Uncertainty over the status and operation of the privilege was a major contemporary issue, and this prompted key questions for research. First, did ill definition of the constitutional relationship between the crown and its prerogatives, and parliament and its privileges, lead to tensions, increasingly polemical attitudes, and a questioning of the royal prerogative? Where did sovereignty now lie? Second, was it important to maximise the scope of the privilege, if parliament was to carry out its business properly? Did ad hoc management of individual privilege cases nevertheless have the cumulative effect of enhancing the authority and confidence of the Commons? Third, to what extent was the exploitation or abuse of privilege an unintended consequence of the strengthening of the Commons’ authority in matters of privilege? Such matters are not treated discretely, but are embedded within chapters that follow a thematic, broadly chronological approach.
    [Show full text]
  • English Travellers of the Renaissance
    FROM THE INCOME OF THE FISKE ENDOWMENT FUND THE BEQUEST OF Ivibrarian of the University 1868-1883 1905 ll.^1).SgM: 4jT0!t ^ff^-ttifnUip Cornell University Library DA 185.H84 English travellers of the renaissance. 3 1924 027 902 349 Cornell University Library The original of tiiis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924027902349 ENGLISH TRAVELLERS OF THE RENAISSANCE THE ADMIRABLE CRICHTON Fro7ii an. eJigi'aving by J. Hall after Moses Griffith Travelled in 1577, at the age of seventeen, and won the admiration of foreigners by his wit and swordsmanship ENGLISH TRAVELLERS OF THE RENAISSANCE BY CLARE HOWARD LONDON : JOHN LANE, THE BODLEY HEAD NEW YORK : JOHN LANE COMPANY TORONTO : BELL & COCKBURN MCMXIV At.&3g8H Tumbull &• Spears, Priniers, Edinburgh PREFACE THIS essay was written in 1908-19 lo while I was studying at Oxford as Fellow of the Society of American Women in London. Material on the subject of travel in any century is apparently inexhaustible, and one could write many books on the subject without duplicating sources. The following aims no further than to describe one phase of Renais- sance travel in clear and sharp outline, with sufficient illustration to embellish but not to clog the main ideas. In the preparation of this book I incurred many debts of gratitude. I would thank the staff of the Bodleian, especially Mr W. H. B. Somerset, for their kindness during the two years I was working in the library of Oxford University ; and Dr Perlbach, Abteilungsdirektor of the Konigliche Bibliothek at Berlin, who forwarded to me some helpful information concerning the early German books of instructions for travellers ; and Professor Clark S.
    [Show full text]
  • GIPE-001848-Contents.Pdf
    Dhananjayarao Gadgil Library III~III~~ mlll~~ I~IIIIIIII~IIIU GlPE-PUNE-OO 1848 CONSTITUTION AL HISTORY OF ENGLAND STUBBS 1Lonbon HENRY FROWDE OXFORD tTNIVERSITY PRESS WAREHOUSE AMEN CORNEl!. THE CONSTITUTIONAL mSTORY OF ENGLAND IN ITS ORIGIN AND DEtrLOP~'r BY WILLIAM STUBBS, D.D., BON. LL.D. BISHOP OF CHESTER VOL. III THIRD EDITIOlY @d.orlt AT Tag CLARENDON PRESS J( Deco LXXXIV [ A II rig"'" reserved. ] V'S;LM3 r~ 7. 3 /fyfS CONTENTS. CHAPTER XVIII. LANCASTER AND YORK. 299. Character of the period, p. 3. 300. Plan of the chapter, p. 5. 301. The Revolution of 1399, p. 6. 302. Formal recognition of the new Dynasty, p. 10. 303. Parliament of 1399, p. 15. 304. Conspiracy of the Earls, p. 26. 805. Beginning af difficulties, p. 37. 306. Parliament of 1401, p. 29. 807. Financial and poli­ tical difficulties, p. 35. 308. Parliament of 1402, 'p. 37. 309. Rebellion of Hotspur, p. 39. 310. Parliament of 14°40 P.42. 311. The Unlearned Parliament, P.47. 312. Rebellion of Northum­ berland, p. 49. 813. The Long Parliament of 1406, p. 54. 314. Parties fonned at Court, p. 59. 315. Parliament at Gloucester, 14°7, p. 61. 816. Arundel's administration, p. 63. 317. Parlia­ mont of 1410, p. 65. 318. Administration of Thomae Beaufort, p. 67. 319. Parliament of 14II, p. 68. 820. Death of Henry IV, p. 71. 821. Character of H'!I'l'Y. V, p. 74. 322. Change of ministers, p. 78. 823. Parliament of 1413, p. 79. 324. Sir John Oldcastle, p. 80. 325.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wars of the Roses: a Timeline of Key Events Edward III Reigns From
    The Wars of the Roses: A Timeline of Key Events . Edward III reigns from 1327 – 1377. Edward has many sons the heirs of which become the key players in the Wars of the Roses (see family tree). o Edward’s first son Edward (The Black Prince) dies in 1376. His son, Richard becomes Richard II following Edward III’s death and reigns from 1377 until 1399. o Edward’s third son Lionel also predeceases him. Lionel’s daughter, however, is integral to the claim made by The House of York to the throne at the time of the Wars of the Roses. Her granddaughter marries Richard, Duke of York who is the son of Edward III’s fifth son, Edmund, Duke of York. Their child Richard, 3rd Duke of York will eventually make a claim for the throne during the Wars of the Roses. o Edward’s fourth son John of Gaunt, Duke of Lancaster, founds The House of Lancaster. His son, Henry (Bolingbroke), overthrows Richard II to become Henry IV. The descendants of Henry IV are King Henry V and King Henry VI. The House of Lancaster therefore has an uninterrupted reign of 62 years. o Edward’s fifth son Edmund of Langley, Duke of York founds The House of York. His son Richard, 2nd Duke of York marries the great- granddaughter of Edward’s third son. 1377: Edward III dies, and Richard II, his grandson, becomes king. Richard II is overthrown by his cousin Henry Bolingbroke who becomes King Henry IV. 1413: Henry IV dies, and Henry V becomes king.
    [Show full text]