DOCSLIB.ORG

THE RICHARD Illand YORKISTHISTORY TRUST

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE RICHARD Illand YORKISTHISTORY TRUST I Index to Persons, Places and Subjects Rulers and their consorts are entered under their Chxistian names. Royal peers are under their title, non-royal members of the peerage and the episcopate under their family names, with cross references from their titles and sees. Page numbers for illustrations are in italics. Abergavenny, Lord we Neville, Bavaria, Blanche of Lancaster, Edward. Duchess of, 95. administration, knights’ role, 101. Bavaria, Louis of the Palatine, Duke alchemy, popularity, 100, 102. of, 95. Alcock, John, Bishop of Worcester, Beauchamp, Elizabeth, Lady Ladmer, 43, 45. 123. Aleyn,_]ohn, moneyet, 61, 62, 63. Beauchamp, Henry, Earl of Warwick, Alyngton, William, 33. 35. Anne Boleyn, queen of Henry VIII, Beauchamp, John, Lord Beauchamp 98. ofPowick,74. Anne Neville, queen of Richard III, Beauchamp, Margaret, Countess of 56. Shrewsbury Annesley, Sir Hugh, 111. property, 119. apprenu'ceship,records, 47. seal, 128, 132. Arthur, Prince of Wales, 92. Beauchamp, Richard, Bishop of Anmdel, Constance d’, Countess of Salisbury, 75. Amndel, 96. Beauchamp, Richard, Earl of Amndel,john (1’, Earl of Amndel, 96. Warwick, 19. Anmdel, Earl of :22 Fitzalan, Thomas; Beauchamp, Richard (son of Lord Fitzalan, William. Beauchamp of Powick), 74. Arundel, John, Bishop of Chichestet, Beaufort, Edmund, Duke of Somerset, 76. 20, 70, 80. Ashton, SirJohn, knight, 102. Beaufort family, genes, 4, 8, 9. Ashton, Six Thomas, 100, 102. Beaufort, Henry, Cardinal, Bishop of Askell, Sir Thomas, 122, 124. Wmchcster, 9, 19. Audley, Lord .ree Tuchet, John. Beaufort, Henry, Duke of Somerset, Bangor, Bishop of .ree Edenham, 16. Thomas. Beaufort, Joan, Countess of Barre,_]ane,Lady Catesby, 123. Westmotland, 8, 9. Basynges, Sirjohn, 110. Beaufort, John, Earl of Somerset, 9. Batail, Thomas and Joan, 48, 52, 53, Beaufort, John, Marquess of Dorset, 58. ‘ 70, 80. Bath, Bishop of we Stillington, Robert. Beaufort, Lady Margaret, Countess of battles Richmond and Derby, flower, 130. Bamet, 81-82. Beaufort, Mary, 20. Nibley Green, 73. Beaufort, Thomas, Duke of Exeter, 9. Saint Albans, 18. Beaumont, William, Viscount 210 Beaumont, 70, 77, 81. Buckingham, Duke of we Stafford, . Bedford, George, Duke of m’ Neville, Henry. " George. Buckland, Richard, 19. Bedford, Jacquetta, Duchess of, 15, Bulmer, Sir Ralph, inactivity. 106. 18, 23, 24-25. Burgh, Elizabeth dc, Duchess of Bedford,]ohn, Duke of, 16, 19. Clarence, 98. Berkeley family, property, 120. Burgh, William de, Earl of Ulster, 98. Berkeley, William, Lord Berkeley, 73. Burgundians, and Crosby Place, 92. Bernard, Robert, 126. Burgundy, Anthony, Bastard of, 26, Bemers, Lord In Bourchier,]ohn. 27-28. Birchefotd, Brother Andrew, 105-106. Burgundy, Charles, Duke of, 27, 28, Blount, Walter, Lord Mountioy, 69, 30, 38, 39. 79. Burgundy, Margaret of York, Duchess Bond, William, and Crosby Place, 93. of, 8, 13, 124. Booth,]ohn, Bishop of Exeter, 70, 71, Butler, Lady Eleanor m Talbot, Lady 82. Eleanor. Booth, Laurence, Bishop of Durham, Butler, Ralph, Lord Sudeley 70, 82. as Lady Eleanor Talbot’s father-in- Bosoun, Robert and Joan, 53. law,114,115,116,117,130. Botcler, Ralph, Lord Sudeley .ree seal, 127, 131. Butler, Ralph. ' and von Wesel's newsletter, 70, 78, Bourchier, Eleanor, Duchess of 79. Norfolk, 121-122. Butler, Sir Thomas, 114, 115, 116, 130. Bourchier family, 69, 76. seal, 127, 128. Bourchier, Fulk, Lord Fitzwarin, 72- Butsyde, Thomas, 33, 43. 73. Cade,]ack, and Lord Scales, 16. Bourchier, Henry, Earl of Essex, 69, Calais ' 72, 76, 79. captaincy, 30. Boutchier, Henry (d.1458), 17. Staple, 85. Bomchiet, Humphrey, Lord Canterbury, Archbishop of we Cromwell, 69, 79, 81. Bourchiet, Thomas. Bourchier, Sit Humphrey, 80, 81. Carlisle, Bishop of Ice Story, Edward. Boutchiet, Isabel of York, Countess of CatpenterJohn, Bishop of Wotcestet, Essex, 17. 76. Bourchier,_]ohn, Lord Bemers, 71, 72. Catru, Sir Nicholas, 103, 104. Bourchiet, Thomas, Archbishop of Cassiman, Préfessor Jean-Jacques, 13. Canterbury, 69, 70, 79, 80, 82. Catesby, Sir Wllliam, . Boutchiet, Sir Thomas (d. 1491), 79. Catesby, William, , 45. Boutchiet, Sir Thomas (d. 1512), 80. Catesby, Sir William, 114, 122, 123. Bourchiet, William, Lord Bourchiet, Catesby, William, 123-124. 69, 79. Caxton,William, 22—23, 24, 25-26, 39- Bracebrigge, William, 88, 89, 91. 40, 41. Bretailles, Louis de, 23, 29. Chamberlain, Sir Roger, 108-109. Bruges, 1468 joust,27-28. charity, and Anthony Woodvflle, 24. Bryan, Sir Thomas, 45, 125. Chaucer family,9, 39. Bryce, Sir Hugh, 60. Chaucer, Thomas, 19. Chedworth, John, Bishop of Lincoln, DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid), 2-3. 70-71, 82. ‘ Dublin, Archbishop of we Ttegury, Chester, Bishop of In Hals,]ohn. Michael. Cheyne, Sir John, 107. Dudley, Lord we Sutton,John. Cheyney, John, 1 18, 120, 121. Durefort, Gaillard de, Lord Duras, 70, Clarence, George, Duke of, 34, 70, 76, 76, 78. 77, 82. Durham, Bishop of m Booth, Clarence, Lionel, Duke of, 98. Laurence. Claver, Alice, 51, 56, 57. Dymock, Andrew, 29, 33, 34-35, 44, Clinton, John, Lord Clinton, 74. 4S. Clopton, Thomas, and Mowbrays, Dymock papers, 36. 126. Edenham, Thomas, Bishop of Bangor, Cobham, Lord, 71. 76. Colepepit, Sir John, 106. Edinburgh, Philip, Duke of, DNA, 1, Colvyle, Sir John, 104-105. 5-6. Comwall, Sir John, Lord Fanhope, 96. Edward IV, 7, 27, 66, 76, 85, 125. Cornwall, Sir John (1404-21), 96. and Anthony Woodville, 15, 39. Courtenay family, 73. and Lady Eleanor Talbot, 120, 125. Courtenay, John, Earl of Devon, 70, and Lord Scales, 16, 17. 80. and von Wesel’s newsletter, 69-70, Courtenay, Sir Philip, 103-104. 77-83. Coventry, Bishop of m Hals,]ohn. Edward V, Prince of Wales, 32, 41-42, Coventry (Warwickshire), 77-78. 80. Creswyck, William, 52. Edward, Prince of Wales (son of Crick, Francis, and DNA, 2. Henry VI), 70, 83. Croft, Sir Richard, 32. Elizabeth I, 7. Cromwell, Lord we Bourchiet, Elizabeth Woodville, queen of Humphrey. Edward IV, 15, 21, 32, 40, 80. Crosby, Sir John, 84-94. Eldngton,]ohn, 60, 64. lst wife, 85, 86. Ely, Bishop of m Gray, William. 2nd wife, 91, 92. Erik VII, King of Denmark, Norway background, 85. and Sweden, 95. tomb, 85-89, 90. Essex Crosby, John, 91. Theydon Gamon, 89, 91. crown servants, status, 59, 60. and Woodvilles, 21, 35. Dacre, Ralph, Lord Dacre, 71. Essex, Earl of :22Bourchiez, Henry. Danyell, Thomas, 36-37. Eton College, and Anthony Derby, Earl of m Stanley, Thomas. Woodville, 24. Devereux, Walter, Lord Ferrets of Evars,John, 122, 124, 129. Chardey, 70, 7178. Exeter, Bishop of we BoothJohn. Devon, Earl of m Courtenay,_]ohn. Exeter, Duke of m Beaufort, Thomas; Dim: and Stylingqf the Phi/amply”, 22- Holland, Henry; Holland, John, lst 23, 39-40. Duke of Excter; Holland, John, 2nd Dinham, John, Lord Dinham, 71, 72- Duke of Exetet. 73. Fanhope, Lord .ree Cornwall, Sir John. diplomacy, knights’ role in, 105. Fastolf dispute, and Pastons, 31-32. 212 Faucoatg, Bastard of m Neville, Hansa merchants, 66, 67-68. Thomas. Harsyk, Sir Roger, 106. Fenny Compton (Wamrickshite), 113, Hastings, John de, Earl of Pembroke, 1 16. 96. Fiennes, William, Lord Say and Sele, Hastings, Si: Ralph, 80. 70, 78, 81. Hastings, William, Lord Hastings, 30, Fisher, Thomas, 89. 59, 60, 123, 124. ' Fitzalan, Elizabeth, Duchess of and von Wesel’s newsletter, 69, 70, Norfolk, 122. 78. Fitzalan, Thomas, Lord Maltmvers Hatton, Nicholas, 50-51, 55. and Earl of Amndel, 70, 71, 78. Haute, Anne, 'and Paston family, 31. Fitzalan, William, Earl of Amndel, 72, Haute, Richard, 44, 45. 76. Henry II, DNA, 4. Fitzhugh, Henry, Lord Fitzhugh, 73- Henry IV, claim to the throne, 95. 74. Henry VI, 102. FitzLewis family, 19-22, 39. and von Wesel’s newsletter, 70, 78, FitzLewis, Henry, 20, 44. 79, 80, 81, 82. FitzLewis,john, 15, 19. Henry VII, previously Earl of FitzLewis, Lewis, 20, 21. Richmond, 7, 35, 85, 95. FitzLewis, Mary, 15, 20, 44. Henry VIII, 98. Fitzwarin, Lord we Bouzchiet, Fulk. Herbert family, 29. Fleet, Wllliam and Isabel, 50, 52, 55. Herbert, William, 2nd Earl of France, English knights’ role in, 108. Pembroke, 32, 71. Gascoyne, Sir William, 109. Hereford, Bishop of In Stanbuty, Gate, Sir Geoffrey, 35-36. John. Gedding, Robert, watdship, 35. Herryong family, 60, 61, 62, 65. Gloucester, Humphrey, Duke of, 108. Hett family, 60, 62, 63, 65. Gloucester, Richard, Duke of m Heywood, Humphrey, 60. Richard III. Heywood, Thomas, 84, 92. goldsmiths, and Mint appointments, Hobart,_]ohn, 125. 60. Holland, Anne, Lady Neville and Gray, Wllliam, Bishop of Ely, 69, 70, Countess of Douglas, 96. 79, 82. Holland, Anne of York, Duchess of Green, Sir Robert, 59. Exeter, DNA, 1, 10, 96. Grey, Anthony, Lord Grey of Ruthin, Holland, Constance, Lady Grey, 96. 70, 71, 78. Holland, Elizabeth of Lancaster, Grey, Edmund, Earl of Kent, 72, 96. Duchess of Exetet, 95-96. Grey, Henry, Lord Grey of Codnoxr, Holland, Henry, Duke of Exeter, 70, 71. 77, 81, 96. Grey, Sir John, 15. Holland,]ohn, lst Duke of Exetet, 96. Grey, Sir Richard, 41. Holland, John, 2nd Duke of Exeter, Grey, Thomas, Marquess of Dorset, 96. 40, 96. hospitals, knights’ role in, 105-106. Hals, John, Bishop of Coventry and Howard family, 30. Lichfield, 70, 79. Howard Household Book, 37. Handy, Sir Robert, 122, 124. Howard, John, Lord Howard and 213 Duke of Norfolk, 18-19, 69, 80. linen, and silkwomen, 46-47. Huggeford, John and Thomas, 122, Lisle, Viscount .ree Talbot, Thomas. 124. Llandaff, Bishop of m Hunden, John. Hunden,]ohn, Bishop of Llandaff, 75. London Husy, Sir William, Lord Chief Justice, Crosby Place, 84, 92. 45. Shoreditch, and moneyers, 62. Ibsen,]oy, DNA, 11, 74. and silkwomen, 46-58. Innasseyson, Gilbert, 33. Smithficld joust, 26-27, 36. Isle of Man, 110-111. London, Bishop of m Kemp, Isle of Wight, 35, 37. Thomas. Jane Seymour, queen of Henry VIII, Louis XVII, DNA, 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Norman Rule Cumbria 1 0
    NORMAN RULE I N C U M B R I A 1 0 9 2 – 1 1 3 6 B y RICHARD SHARPE A lecture delivered to Cumberland and Westmorland Antiquarian and Archaeological Society on 9th April 2005 at Carlisle CUMBERLAND AND WESTMORLAND ANTIQUARIAN AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY N O R M A N R U L E I N C U M B R I A 1 0 9 2 – 1 1 3 6 NORMAN RULE I N C U M B R I A 1 0 9 2 – 1 1 3 6 B y RICHARD SHARPE Pr o f essor of Diplomat i c , U n i v e r sity of Oxfo r d President of the Surtees Society A lecture delivered to Cumberland and Westmorland Antiquarian and Archaeological Society on 9th April 2005 at Carlisle CUMBERLAND AND WESTMORLAND ANTIQUARIAN AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY Tract Series Vol. XXI C&W TRACT SERIES No. XXI ISBN 1 873124 43 0 Published 2006 Acknowledgements I am grateful to the Council of the Society for inviting me, as president of the Surtees Society, to address the Annual General Meeting in Carlisle on 9 April 2005. Several of those who heard the paper on that occasion have also read the full text and allowed me to benefit from their comments; my thanks to Keith Stringer, John Todd, and Angus Winchester. I am particularly indebted to Hugh Doherty for much discussion during the preparation of this paper and for several references that I should otherwise have missed. In particular he should be credited with rediscovering the writ-charter of Henry I cited in n.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parochial Ministry of the Leaders of the Eighteenth Century Evangelical Revival1
    123/2 master:119/3 19/5/09 12:40 Page 143 143 The Parochial Ministry of the Leaders of the Eighteenth Century Evangelical Revival 1 David Wheaton Mention the evangelicals of the eighteenth centUry and many will conjUre Up pictUres of George Whitefield and John Wesley proclaiming the gospel to hUndreds or thoUsands at Moorfields, Kingsdown and other sUch venUes. They are portrayed as never so happy as when they are preaching, and so it is not sUrprising that a centUry later in 1853 W. J. Conybeare caricatUred the evangelical clergyman as being ‘oUt of his element in a parish … what he likes is, not a parish, bUt a congregation. The possession of a chapel in a large town, which he may fill with his disciples, is his idea of clerical UsefUlness’. 2 This statement may reflect the fact that at that time the rise of Anglo- Catholicism and introdUction of the trappings of the Unreformed ChUrch of Rome had caUsed many evangelical lay people to petition for a chUrch where the style of worship woUld continUe to reflect the simplicity of the Book of Common Prayer. In many cases bishops were relUctant to allow new parishes to be carved oUt of the existing ones, and so if we take the case of Jesmond Parish ChUrch in Newcastle it was initially proposed that the new chUrch shoUld be foUnded as a proprietary chapel. Similarly, at the other end of the coUntry, when an evangelical philanthropist desired to endow a chUrch, vicarage and school in the parish of Ware becaUse the incUmbent had adopted Anglo-Catholic practices, the diocesan aUthorities initially sUggested that a proprietary chapel woUld be preferable.
    [Show full text]
  • Rose Castle Dalston • Cumbria
    Rose Castle Dalston • Cumbria Rose Castle DALSTON • Cumbria One of the most significant houses in the north of England Lot 1 Grade I listed Castle with formal gardens and grounds, 2 cottages, farmhouse, modern and traditional farm buildings, farm cottage, 21.88 acres of arable, 17.26 acres of pasture in all about 61.46 acres Lot 2 Excellent block of productive agricultural land and a mixture of amenity woodland, 33.68 acres of pasture, 39.7 acres of arable, 8.24 acres of woodland, fishing on the River Caldew in all about 86.38 acres lot 3 Arable and pasture land with mature woodland and fishing on the River Caldew, 14.80 acres of pasture, 19.92 acres of arable, 7.81 acres of woodland in all about 45.30 acres Whole: in all about 193.14 acres Dalston 3 miles • Carlisle 8 miles • Penrith 18 miles (All distances are approximate) These particulars are intended only as a guide and must not be relied upon as statements of fact. Your attention is drawn to the Important Notice on the last page of the text. situation Rose Castle sits in an elevated position overlooking historic parkland within the beautiful Caldew Valley. The castle is south and east facing and its view over the valley below has remained unchanged for decades. To the south, Caldbeck Fell and the northern hills of the Lake District stand at the head of the valley. This part of Cumbria is known for its unspoilt beauty and rolling hills. Lush grassland and traditional agricultural practices have maintained the exceptionally scenic nature of the countryside for generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Establishing the Tudor Dynasty: the Role of Francesco Piccolomini in Rome As First Cardinal Protector of England
    2017 IV Establishing the Tudor Dynasty: The Role of Francesco Piccolomini in Rome as First Cardinal Protector of England Susan May Article: Establishing the Tudor Dynasty: The Role of Francesco Piccolomini in Rome as First Cardinal Protector of England Establishing the Tudor Dynasty: The Role of Francesco Piccolomini in Rome as First Cardinal Protector of England1 Susan May Abstract: Between 1492 and 1503, Francesco Todeschini Piccolomini (1439–1503) was the first officially appointed Cardinal Protector of England. This paper focuses on a select few of his activities executed in that capacity for Henry Tudor, King Henry VII. Drawing particularly on two unpublished letters, it underscores the importance for King Henry of having his most trusted supporters translated to significant bishoprics throughout the land, particularly in the northern counties, and explores Queen Elizabeth of York’s patronage of the hospital and church of St Katharine-by-the-Tower in London. It further considers the mechanisms through which artists and humanists could be introduced to the Tudor court, namely via the communication and diplomatic infrastructure of Italian merchant-bankers. This study speculates whether, by the end of his long incumbency of forty-three years at the Sacred College, uncomfortably mindful of the extent of a cardinal’s actual and potential influence in temporal affairs, Piccolomini finally became reluctant to wield the power of the purple. Keywords: Francesco Todeschini Piccolomini; Henry VII; early Tudor; cardinal protector; St Katharine’s; Italian merchant-bankers ope for only twenty-six days following his election, taking the name of Pius III (Fig. 1), Francesco Todeschini Piccolomini (1439–1503) has understandably been P overshadowed in reputation by his high-profile uncle, Aeneas Silvius Piccolomini, Pope Pius II (1458–64).
    [Show full text]
  • Runaway Wives: Husband Desertion in Medieval England
    RUNAWAY WIVES: HUSBAND DESERTION IN MEDIEVAL ENGLAND By Sara Butler Loyola University New Orleans Scholars of the medieval family would generally agree that the lot of the me- dieval wife was not an easy one. Medieval husbands held the upper hand in the power relationship, both legally and socially. Although Lawrence Stone's view of niarried life in the Middle Ages as "brutal and often hostile, with little communication, [and] much wife-beating" has since been called into question, more recent historians have still painted a somewhat unflattering picture.' Ju- dith Bennett writes that "[m]edieval people thought of conjugality as a hierar- chy headed by a husband who not only controlled his wife's financial assets and public behavior, but also freely enforced his will through physical violence."^ Indeed, she argues that wife-beating was "a normal part of marriage."^ Even Bar- bara Hanawalt, who has optimistically described peasant marriage in medieval England as a partnership, still concedes that occasional violence was acceptable and expected in marriage.'' What is more, the rules of coverture, which adhered to the biblical principal of husband and wife as one flesh represented at law by the husband, left a wife economically vulnerable. Because all real and movable property legally belonged to the husband as head of the household, a wife who fell out of favor with her husband might well find herself expelled from the family home, without any resources to fall back on.^ From a modern perspective, mari- tal practices hardly provided any sense of reassurance. At a time when families, more often than individuals, took the lead in spousal selection, and inheritance and status were the chief criteria, strong bonds of affection were not guaranteed.
    [Show full text]
  • York Clergy Ordinations 1374-1399
    York Clergy Ordinations 1374-1399 Edited by David M. Smith 2020 www.york.ac.uk/borthwick archbishopsregisters.york.ac.uk Online images of the Archbishops’ Registers cited in this edition can be found on the York’s Archbishops’ Registers Revealed website. The conservation, imaging and technical development work behind the digitisation project was delivered thanks to funding from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Register of Alexander Neville 1374-1388 Register of Thomas Arundel 1388-1396 Sede Vacante Register 1397 Register of Robert Waldby 1397 Sede Vacante Register 1398 Register of Richard Scrope 1398-1405 YORK CLERGY ORDINATIONS 1374-1399 Edited by DAVID M. SMITH 2020 CONTENTS Introduction v Ordinations held 1374-1399 vii Editorial notes xiv Abbreviations xvi York Clergy Ordinations 1374-1399 1 Index of Ordinands 169 Index of Religious 249 Index of Titles 259 Index of Places 275 INTRODUCTION This fifth volume of medieval clerical ordinations at York covers the years 1374 to 1399, spanning the archiepiscopates of Alexander Neville, Thomas Arundel, Robert Waldby and the earlier years of Richard Scrope, and also including sede vacante ordinations lists for 1397 and 1398, each of which latter survive in duplicate copies. There have, not unexpectedly, been considerable archival losses too, as some later vacancy inventories at York make clear: the Durham sede vacante register of Alexander Neville (1381) and accompanying visitation records; the York sede vacante register after Neville’s own translation in 1388; the register of Thomas Arundel (only the register of his vicars-general survives today), and the register of Robert Waldby (likewise only his vicar-general’s register is now extant) have all long disappeared.1 Some of these would also have included records of ordinations, now missing from the chronological sequence.
    [Show full text]
  • John Spence Pembroke College, Cambridge
    The Identity of Rauf de Boun, Author of the Petit Bruit John Spence Pembroke College, Cambridge The chronicle called the Petit Bruit was written by meistre Rauf de Boun in 1309. 1 The Petit Bruit is preserved in full in only one manuscript: London, British Library, MS Harley 902, ff. I' - II '.' It recounts the history of England from the arrival oflegendary Trojan founder Brutus down to Edward I, interspersed with legendary characters such as King Arthur, Havelok and Guy of Warwick. This might sound like a familiar pattern for a late medieval chronicle of England, but despite this the identity of the Petit Bruit's sources have remained unclear.' Many details of Rauf de Boun's account differ greatly from the legendary history familiar from Geoffrey of Monmouth's Historia Regum Britanniae and its descendants, and the Petit Bruit sometimes also distorts more factual material, as when Edward the Confessor is succeeded by his brother, the imaginary Miles, who in turn is murdered by Harold, who has also become Edward the Confessor's (and Miles's) brother.' It has to be said that Raurs grasp of the span of English history does not seem very firm, and he has been much criticised for this, most memorably by Sir Frederic Madden who ;n 1828 referred to him as a 'miserable History-monger'.' The anomalous nature of the Petit Bruit has perhaps led historians to undervalue the work, however. After all, playing fast and loose with Geoffrey of Monmouth's confection of British legends hardly disqualifies Rauf de Boun from being a capable chronicler of more recent history.
    [Show full text]
  • Biographical Appendix
    Biographical Appendix The following women are mentioned in the text and notes. Abney- Hastings, Flora. 1854–1887. Daughter of 1st Baron Donington and Edith Rawdon- Hastings, Countess of Loudon. Married Henry FitzAlan Howard, 15th Duke of Norfolk, 1877. Acheson, Theodosia. 1882–1977. Daughter of 4th Earl of Gosford and Louisa Montagu (daughter of 7th Duke of Manchester and Luise von Alten). Married Hon. Alexander Cadogan, son of 5th Earl of Cadogan, 1912. Her scrapbook of country house visits is in the British Library, Add. 75295. Alten, Luise von. 1832–1911. Daughter of Karl von Alten. Married William Montagu, 7th Duke of Manchester, 1852. Secondly, married Spencer Cavendish, 8th Duke of Devonshire, 1892. Grandmother of Alexandra, Mary, and Theodosia Acheson. Annesley, Katherine. c. 1700–1736. Daughter of 3rd Earl of Anglesey and Catherine Darnley (illegitimate daughter of James II and Catherine Sedley, Countess of Dorchester). Married William Phipps, 1718. Apsley, Isabella. Daughter of Sir Allen Apsley. Married Sir William Wentworth in the late seventeenth century. Arbuthnot, Caroline. b. c. 1802. Daughter of Rt. Hon. Charles Arbuthnot. Stepdaughter of Harriet Fane. She did not marry. Arbuthnot, Marcia. 1804–1878. Daughter of Rt. Hon. Charles Arbuthnot. Stepdaughter of Harriet Fane. Married William Cholmondeley, 3rd Marquess of Cholmondeley, 1825. Aston, Barbara. 1744–1786. Daughter and co- heir of 5th Lord Faston of Forfar. Married Hon. Henry Clifford, son of 3rd Baron Clifford of Chudleigh, 1762. Bannister, Henrietta. d. 1796. Daughter of John Bannister. She married Rev. Hon. Brownlow North, son of 1st Earl of Guilford, 1771. Bassett, Anne. Daughter of Sir John Bassett and Honor Grenville.
    [Show full text]
  • The Topographer Genealogist
    THE TOPOGRAPHER AND GENEALOGIST. THE ANCIENT EARLDOMS OF ENGLAND. IN'l'RODUCTORY OBSERVATIONS, By long sustained reputation, and by the suffrages of a con• tinued series of deeply indebted authors and compilers, during a period of nearly two centuries, the Baronage of Sir William Dugdale is the attmitted authority upon all matters relating to the genealogical history of the Peers of England. Nor is the reputation· of that great work undeserved: for its Author deli• vered fairly and judiciously, from the evidence before him, all the information he possessed respecting the magtiates· et proceres of his native country. His statements were deduced, as his title• page declares, ,( from publick records, antient. historians, and other authorities." He neither indulged in theories, in order to · display bis own penetration or ingenuity; nor admitted legendary fictions and cunningly devised fables to flatter either the fond fancies of old families or the unwarranted assumptions of new. In this respect he not only earned a confidence which was not due to his now almost forgotten predecessors; a but he set an • The following works are here alluded to, - Beronagium Genealogicum. By Sir William Segar, Gaeter King of Arms, 'This was not printed, but remaioa in MS. in the College of Arms. Sir William Betham, Ulster, has an early if not an original copy, It is said by Moule {Bibliotheca lle~&ldica, p. 54) that Edmondson (by which we must "Understand Sir Joseph Ayloffe, the patron and prompter of Edmondson,) derived his Baronagium from this source. The Catalogue of HonOI', By Thomas Milles. 1610, folio. A C.talog11e and Succession of the Kings, Princes, Dukes, Marquesses, Earles, and Viscounts, of this Realme of England.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Southampton Research Repository Eprints Soton
    University of Southampton Research Repository ePrints Soton Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", University of Southampton, name of the University School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination http://eprints.soton.ac.uk i UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON FACULTY OF HUMANITIES School of History The Wydeviles 1066-1503 A Re-assessment by Lynda J. Pidgeon Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 15 December 2011 ii iii ABSTRACT Who were the Wydeviles? The family arrived with the Conqueror in 1066. As followers in the Conqueror’s army the Wydeviles rose through service with the Mowbray family. If we accept the definition given by Crouch and Turner for a brief period of time the Wydeviles qualified as barons in the twelfth century. This position was not maintained. By the thirteenth century the family had split into two distinct branches. The senior line settled in Yorkshire while the junior branch settled in Northamptonshire. The junior branch of the family gradually rose to prominence in the county through service as escheator, sheriff and knight of the shire.
    [Show full text]
  • Assizes of Clarendon 1164 in the Year 1164 from The
    (Stubbs' "Charters," p. 135.) Assizes of Clarendon 1164 In the year 1164 from the Incarnation of our Lord, in the fourth year of the papacy of Alexander, in the tenth year of the most illustrious king of the English, Henry II., in the presence of that same king, this memorandum or inquest was made of some part of the customs and liberties. and dignities of his predecessors, viz., of king Henry his grandfather and others, which ought to be observed and kept in the kingdom. And on account of the dissensions and discords which had arisen between the clergy and the Justices of the lord king, and the barons of the kingdom concerning the customs and dignities, this inquest was made in the presence of the archbishops and bishops, and clergy and counts, and barons and chiefs of the kingdom. And these customs, recognized by the archbishops and bishops and counts and barons and by the nobler ones and elders of the kingdom, Thomas Archbishop of Canterbury, and Roger archbishop of York, and Gilbert bishop of London, and Henry bishop of Winchester, and Nigel bishop of Ely, and William bishop of Norwich, and Robert bishop of Lincoln, and Hilary bishop of Chichester, and Jocelin bishop of Salisbury, and Richard bishop of Chester, and Bartholemew bishop of Exeter and Robert bishop of Hereford, and David bishop of Mans, and Roger elect of Worcester, did grant; and, upon the Word of Truth did orally firmly promise to keep and observe, under the lord king and under his heirs, in good faith and without evil wile,-in the presence of the following: Robert count of I`eicester, Reginald count of Cornwall, Conan count of Bretagne, John count of Eu, Roger count of Clare, count Geoffrey of Mandeville, Hugo count of Chester, William count of Arundel, count Patrick, William count of Ferrara, Richard de I~uce, Reginald de St.
    [Show full text]
  • Court Chivalry and Politics: Nominations and Elections to the Order of the Garter: 1461-83
    COURT CHIVALRY AND POLITICS: NOMINATIONS AND ELECTIONS TO THE ORDER OF THE GARTER: 1461-83 A Ph.D. Dissertation By T. Tolga GUMUS THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BİLKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA APRIL 2007 To Ekrem, Taskin, Ovgu and Orkun COURT CHIVALRY AND POLITICS: NOMINATIONS AND ELECTIONS TO THE ORDER OF THE GARTER: 1461-83 The Institute of Economics and Social Sciences of Bilkent University By T. Tolga GUMUS In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BİLKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA APRIL 2007 I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. --------------------------------- Assist. Prof. David E. Thornton Supervisor I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. --------------------------------- Assist. Prof. Paul Latimer Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. --------------------------------- Assist. Prof. Edward Kohn Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. --------------------------------- Assist. Prof. Julian Bennett Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History.
    [Show full text]