DOCSLIB.ORG

Play Book • December 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Play Book • December 2013 Living Play Book • December 2013 PLAY BOOK Table of Contents PB 1.0 Optional Rules ....................................................... 2 PB 5.0 Example of Play .................................................. 13 PB 2.0 Game Setup ........................................................... 4 PB 6.0 Historical Notes ................................................... 19 PB 3.0 Scenarios ............................................................... 4 PB 7.0 Expanded Sequence of Play ................................ 28 PB 4.0 Designer Notes .................................................... 11 This is the “Living Play Book” document for the game. It includes errata and clarifications to the original rules. To aid readability, errata is indicated in blue text. GMT Games, LLC • P.O. Box 1308, Hanford, CA 93232-1308 www.GMTGames.com 2 CROWN OF ROSES Play Book Example: On Turn 3, March is the Senior York Heir, but Rivers is currently not controlled by York; though York has influence placed on him, as well as Warwick. As such, York loses one Popular Support at the beginning of the King Phase but the IPs placed on Warwick are subject to no negative modifier. On Turn 4, assuming Rivers is still controlled by York, York will have to place at least one (1) IP on Warwick or lose him during the Parliament Phase (3 pro-York Roses – 4 [Game Turn] equals negative 1). PB 1.3 Distrustful Margaret Rule (Historical Rule) Queen Margaret was very distrustful of Henry Holland, the Duke of Exeter (Exeter Block), especially early in the conflict, as Exeter was Henry VI’s immediate Heir at the time. Because of this mistrust (which turned out to be misplaced), Exeter can- not Lead any non-Office Blocks for Movement or Combat while Margaret is In-Play in England (i.e., not in Exile). PB 1.4 Shared Estates Some Nobles/Heirs may treat Home Estates of some other PB 1.0 Optional Rules Nobles/Heirs as if they were their own Home Estate, in all respects and for all game purposes. They may share Estates PB 1.1 Force Exhaustion according to the following list: This rule simulates the possibility that both armies will be too • Henry VI and his Host Block, Margaret and her Host Block, exhausted and/or too weak to continue with a Battle. If, dur- and Prince Edward (Lancaster Block) may share Estates (this ing any Combat Round, both forces roll no hits, both sides are is in addition to being able to use the Red Rose Lancaster considered to be “exhausted”. The Battle ends and the Attacker Estates). must Retreat, if possible. If he cannot Retreat, the Defender may Retreat if he has a valid Retreat path. If the Defender chooses • Salisbury, Warwick, and Montague may share Estates if the not to Retreat, then the Attacker moves all his Blocks to his same Player controls the Blocks who are sharing. Undeclared Pool. This is in addition to any Nobles that share a shield icon on their Blocks. Placement is still subject to the restrictions in the PB 1.2 Woodville Rule (Historical Rule) normal rules (7.2.6). While March is the Senior York Heir, at the beginning of each King Phase (before resolving any actions of the King PB 1.5 Team Games Phase), the York Player must check to see if he controls the It is possible for Players to play the game as teams. In a four- Rivers Noble Block. player game, there will be two teams of two. A three-player If York does not control Rivers, York loses one (1) Popular game can also be used for team play, and this is especially Support. useful if one player is more experienced (the less experienced players each play one half of one team). Teams can consist of If York does control Rivers, York suffers the following pen- any two Houses (exception: Lancaster and York may never be alty: for each of the Warwick (blue background) Nobles, York on the same team, and Buckingham and Warwick may never is considered to have a negative influence modifier equal to the be on the same team). current Game Turn number. Team games use all of the standard rules, except as noted here: When resolving the Gather Supporter’s Phase, check the net bid amount for each Warwick Noble influenced OR controlled • Each Player in a team functions as a separate entity, with by York (even if no IP Markers are placed on those Nobles – this individual turns and separate hands. Each will have his own is different than in the normal rules!). If the net bid amount is pool of Influence Points. negative, York loses control of that Noble and places him next • Team members cannot engage in combat against their partner. to the game board as an Inactive Noble (obviously, if another They cannot Intercept, Evade, or otherwise avoid forces be- Player had successfully influenced the Noble, it would be placed longing to their partner (e.g., by Card play). Blocks belonging with that Player’s In-Play Nobles, instead). to a Player’s partner are considered Friendly. Remember: In a four-player game, Warwick Heirs cannot be influenced at all. © 2013 GMT Games, LLC CROWN OF ROSES Play Book 3 • Any Shire that is Friendly for either partner is considered An Economic Victory counts all areas held by the team (sum Friendly for both partners, except for the purposes of Influ- the values for each partner), but Automatic Victory is always ence and Military Victory. Each Player tracks his control of per the 2-player level (i.e. 14 VP’s). Political Victories require Shires separately for Economic Victory and for determining one (1) additional Turn as King for the team (note: Turns with new IPs. Control is determined by whichever partner has either partner being King count) and count all Nobles controlled the most Blocks in the Shire, ties resolved per the normal tie by the team (sum the number for each partner). breaking rules (10.5.1). Example: Lancaster and Buckingham are a team against York • In Combat, each partner may contribute some forces to the in a 3-player game. For them to achieve a Military Victory, active Battle. One Player must contribute the Leader Block, as they would need to control the six York-loyal Shires while he would with any Battle. Each Player decides which Blocks maintaining control of at least four Shires loyal to each of he is willing to contribute separately, but the total number of Lancaster and Buckingham. Blocks picked for the Main Force may not exceed the Com- mand Rating of the Leader Block. Blocks in excess of this • Each Player in a team can also win an individual Military, value are placed in the Reserves, as normal. Reinforcements Economic or Political Victory if he meets the criteria as set arrive as normal, but from both partner’s forces. forth in the scenario instruction. • Retreats in combat are at the discretion of the House con- • Remember: In team play, Lancaster can never partner with trolling the Leader Block, only. Each Player may Retreat to York, and Buckingham can never partner with Warwick. a different location, as long as he has a valid Retreat path. Remember: Blocks belonging to the Player’s partner are PB 1.6 IP Collection/Usage considered Friendly. If you find that you want even more voting, deal making and backstabbing among Players, make the following slight change • The decision to conduct a Battle Charge is at the discretion of to how IPs are collected and used. In the Influence Phase, when the House controlling the Leader Block (only), but is limited you calculate the number of IPs you are to gain, mark this with to one (1) Heir, per the normal rules. The Leader Block may your small cylinder as usual. However, do not collect these select a partner’s Heir to Charge, but the partner may decline new IPs at this point. to Charge if he desires. Next, calculate your total available votes and mark this total as • Each partner rolls the damage dice for his own Blocks. The normal. Then, collect a number of IP Markers from your Un- combined total is applied to the enemy force. claimed Pool equal to this total (important: keep these separate • Damage is distributed between the partners according to the from your Stock IPs!). Determine the King as normal, voting standard rules, with the House controlling the Leader Block based on your total votes recorded above. determining ties. After determining the new King, each Player uses these separate • In a joint combat force, each Player keeps his own Blocks in IP Markers as “Votes” during the upcoming Office Phase to front of himself. bid on the various Offices. I.e., true IP Markers are now only • In team play, each partner’s Heirs function normally. used for Influencing Nobles, while these “Votes” (temporarily represented by IP Markers) are used to vote on Offices. At the • Cards that affects combat can be played by either partner and conclusion of the Office Phase, return all unused “Votes” (IP affect all Friendly or Enemy forces (i.e., all partner forces Markers) to your Unclaimed Pool, and then collect your new, are affected by any applicable Cards). true, IPs based on the small cylinder you marked previously. • In Parliament, each Player casts his Votes independently, but may (obviously) cast his Votes for his partner by selec-tion of Example: York determines that he has gained 18 IPs this turn, his partner’s “Votes for” marker. Partners are free to discuss so places his small white cylinder on the “18” square of the supporting votes. Influence Track. He does not collect 18 points of IP Mark- ers yet, however. Instead, play proceeds to the King Phase • Military Victory requires the indicated number of enemy Shires where he calculates his total Votes—an astounding 24.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Heritage Assets Tyrley
    Loggerheads Parish Tyrley Ward Heritage Assets Tyrley Ward Tyrley A settlement recorded in the Domesday Survey of 1086 “lying within Hodnet Hundred (in Shropshire). William also holds Tyrley of the Earl Roger. Wulfric and Ravensward held it as two manors; they were free. One hide paying tax. There is land for two ploughs. There are four villagers and one slave with one plough. The value was 17 shillings and is now 20 shillings.” Recorded as a suspected lost village situated near the modern settlement of Hales by Bate and Palliser. No date of desertion is given. Jonathan Morris, in his book ‘The Shropshire Union Canal’ (1991), explains the origin of the name Tyrley. Tyrley Castle Farm is on the site of a Saxon castle which was built on a man-made mound in a field. The Saxon for mound is ‘tir’ and for field ‘ley’, hence Tirley which has become Tyrley Tyrley Wharf Page 68 Loggerheads Parish Tyrley Ward Heritage Assets Forming part of the Tyrley Conservation Area DC, The delightful collection of grade two listed buildings at Tyrley Wharf on the Shropshire Union Canal was constructed by the Peatswood Estate to coincide with the completion of the canal. There were originally seven individual cottages built to house estate workers and a stable to accommodate the horses used to tow canal barges. Constructed in brown brick with ashlar dressings, slate roof with coped verges on stone kneelers, multi-paned 2- light casements in plastered stone surrounds to first, second and fourth bays from left, blind round-headed brick opening to third; 3 lean-to timber porches on brick dwarf walls with slate roofs to front over cambered doorways with boarded doors; prominent paired and rebated ridge stack to left (shared between Nos.30 and 31) and taller ridge stack to right (to No.32).
    [Show full text]
  • THE ROSES ✥ 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 1 2 3 4 5 36 37 38X
    This content downloaded from 136.167.3.36 on Thu, 11 Jan 2018 18:42:15 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ✥ THE WARS OF THE ROSES ✥ 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 1 2 3 4 5 36 37 38x This content downloaded from 136.167.3.36 on Thu, 11 Jan 2018 18:42:15 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 THE WARS OF 8 9 ✥ ✥ 10 THE ROSES 1 2 3 MICHAEL HICKS 4 5 6 7 8 9 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 1 2 3 4 5 36 YALE UNIVERSITY PRESS 37 NEW HAVEN AND LONDON 38x This content downloaded from 136.167.3.36 on Thu, 11 Jan 2018 18:42:15 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Copyright © 2010 Michael Hicks 8 9 All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and 20 except by reviewers for the public press) without written permission from the publishers. 1 For information about this and other Yale University Press publications, please contact: 2 U.S. Office: [email protected] www.yalebooks.com 3 Europe Office: sales @yaleup.co.uk www.yaleup.co.uk 4 Set in Minion Pro by IDSUK (DataConnection) Ltd 5 Printed in Great Britain by TJ International Ltd, Padstow, Cornwall 6 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data 7 8 Hicks, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Právní Aspekty Nástupnictví V Době Válek Růží
    Západočeská univerzita v Plzni Fakulta právnická Katedra právních dějin DIPLOMOVÁ PRÁCE Právní aspekty nástupnictví v době válek růží Karolína Hýblová Vedoucí práce: JUDr. et PhDr. Stanislav Balík, Ph. D. Plzeň, 2019 Čestné prohlášení Prohlašuji, že jsem diplomovou práci vypracovala samostatně s použitím uvedené literatury a pramenů. Plzeň, březen 2019 ...................................... PODĚKOVÁNÍ Na tomto místě bych ráda poděkovala vedoucímu této diplomové práce panu JUDr. et PhDr. Stanislavu Balíkovi, Ph. D. za odborné vedení práce, cenné rady a připomínky při jejím zpracování. Obsah 1. Úvod……………………………………………………………...………..3 2. Historický kontext válek růží……………………………………………5 2.1 Války růží……………………………………………………………..5 2.2 Nástupnictví na trůn ve středověké Anglii…………………………....7 2.2.1 Nástupnický nárok založený na právu krve…………………...9 2.2.1.1 Právní nárok na trůn odvozený z manželství…………….10 2.2.2 Nástupnictví na základě volby……………………………….11 2.2.3 Právní titul vítězství v bitvě………………………………….12 3. Právní nárok Lancasterů………………………………………………13 3.1 Dědičné právo……………………………………………………….13 3.1.1 Uzurpace trůnu Jindřichem IV………………………………13 3.1.2 Problematika nástupnictví za vlády Jindřicha V…………….26 3.2 Jindřich VI…………………………………………………………...29 3.3 Právní legitimita následnictví Eduarda z Lancasteru………………..35 4. Legitimita nástupnictví Yorků………………………………………...39 4.1 Richard z Yorku……………………………………………………..39 4.2 Nástupnická práva Eduarda IV……………………………………...46 4.3 Právní nárok na trůn Richarda, vévody z Gloucesteru………………57 4.3.1 Problematika nástupnických práv Eduarda V……………….57 4.3.2 Překážka nelegitimity potomků Eduarda IV………………...60 4.3.3 Titulus Regius……………………………………………….65 5. Pád Plantagenetů a nástup Tudorovců………………………………..74 5.1 Nástupnictví po právu krve…………………………………………..74 5.2 Dobytí území…………………………………………………………82 6. Závěr……………………………………………………....…………….87 7.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wars of the Roses: a Timeline of Key Events Edward III Reigns From
    The Wars of the Roses: A Timeline of Key Events . Edward III reigns from 1327 – 1377. Edward has many sons the heirs of which become the key players in the Wars of the Roses (see family tree). o Edward’s first son Edward (The Black Prince) dies in 1376. His son, Richard becomes Richard II following Edward III’s death and reigns from 1377 until 1399. o Edward’s third son Lionel also predeceases him. Lionel’s daughter, however, is integral to the claim made by The House of York to the throne at the time of the Wars of the Roses. Her granddaughter marries Richard, Duke of York who is the son of Edward III’s fifth son, Edmund, Duke of York. Their child Richard, 3rd Duke of York will eventually make a claim for the throne during the Wars of the Roses. o Edward’s fourth son John of Gaunt, Duke of Lancaster, founds The House of Lancaster. His son, Henry (Bolingbroke), overthrows Richard II to become Henry IV. The descendants of Henry IV are King Henry V and King Henry VI. The House of Lancaster therefore has an uninterrupted reign of 62 years. o Edward’s fifth son Edmund of Langley, Duke of York founds The House of York. His son Richard, 2nd Duke of York marries the great- granddaughter of Edward’s third son. 1377: Edward III dies, and Richard II, his grandson, becomes king. Richard II is overthrown by his cousin Henry Bolingbroke who becomes King Henry IV. 1413: Henry IV dies, and Henry V becomes king.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cold War • Read the Pages of the Text Book in the Following Pages
    Additional History Transition Work - The Cold War • Read the pages of the text book in the following pages. • Using this information, write an answer to the following question: “Why did the Grand Alliance Break down?” In your answer, you must: • Explain what the Grand Alliance was • Assess how much longer-term factors led to the collapse of the Grand Alliance (e.g. their different ideologies) • Assess how much shorter-term factors led to the collapse of the Grand Alliance (e.g. decisions about Europe towards the end of World War Two and immediately after) • Conclusion: What do you think was the main cause of the Grand Alliance’s collapse? Remember to include lots of factual evidence Additional History Transition Work - The Tudors Step 1: Make a chronological list of all the people in the family tree who were monarchs and the dates they reigned. Make sure to write which house they belonged to. (be careful… some are king more than once) Step 2: Read the article on the following page called, “The Wars of the Roses” by History.com editors. Step 3: Using your knowledge from the article and your own research, annotate the family tree including description of events that included different people. Step 4: Answer the following questions in detail. Q1. What caused the Wars of the Roses? Q2. What role did the nobility play within the Wars of the Roses? (Nobles that are mentioned in the article are: the Earl of Somerset, the Earl of Warwick, Lord Salisbury, Lord Audley) (Thinking points: how much power did they have? How much did the leaders on both sides rely on them? How trustworthy were they?) Q3.
    [Show full text]
  • Battles and Warfare
    BATTLES AND WARFARE GENERAL Le Jeu de la Hache: A Fifteenth-century Treatise on the Technique of Chivalric Axe Combat ANGLO Sydney Description: From Archaeologia, Vol. 109 Date of publication: 1991 Synopsis: Text and commentary on Le Jeu de la Hache (Bibliothèque Nationale, manuscrit français 1996), the only surviving treatise devoted exclusively to medieval axe combat. [LIBRARY NOTE: Filed under Fine and Applied Arts] The Times Guide to Battlefields of Britain ANON Description: From The Times Dates of publication: 3rd & 4th August, 1994 Synopsis: Articles on some of the battles included in English Heritage’s official new battlefields list (The Complete Guide to the Battlefields of Britain by David Smurthwaite), viz. Bannockburn, Shrewsbury, Blore Heath, Tewkesbury and Bosworth. The Wars of the Roses ANON Description: From Military History Monthly, Issue 50 Date of publication: November 2014 Synopsis: Well illustrated twenty-page editorial feature on the English civil conflicts of the fifteenth century. Includes an overview of the dynastic struggles and military campaigns, a discussion of military equipment and tactics, a longer feature on the Battle of Barnet and a brief revisionist analysis of Richard III. The strongest sections are those dealing with military matters. The brief historical explanations are, however, generally reliable, the most obvious error being the inclusion of a portrait of Elizabeth of York labelled ‘Elizabeth Woodville, Edward’s queen.’ The Wars of the Roses 1455-87 COATES Dr. J. I. Description: Typescript Date of publication: N/A Synopsis: Outline of the causes and main events of the wars. Heraldic Banners of the Wars of the Roses: Counties of Anglesey to Hampshire COVENEY Thomas Description: Freezywater Publications booklet, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge Pre-U
    Cambridge Pre-U HISTORY 9769/11 Paper 1a British History Outlines, c.300–1547 For examination from 2020 MARK SCHEME Maximum Mark: 90 Specimen This specimen paper has been updated for assessments from 2020. The specimen questions and mark schemes remain the same. The layout and wording of the front covers have been updated to reflect the new Cambridge International branding and to make instructions clearer for candidates. This syllabus is regulated for use in England, Wales and Northern Ireland as a Cambridge International Level 3 Pre-U Certificate. This document has 36 pages. Blank pages are indicated. © UCLES 2018 [Turn over 9769/11 Cambridge Pre-U – Mark Scheme For examination SPECIMEN from 2020 Generic Marking Principles These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers. They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptors for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these marking principles. GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 1: Marks must be awarded in line with: • the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question • the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question • the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts. GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 2: Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions). GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 3: Marks must be awarded positively: • marks
    [Show full text]
  • MA Dissertatio
    Durham E-Theses Northumberland at War BROAD, WILLIAM,ERNEST How to cite: BROAD, WILLIAM,ERNEST (2016) Northumberland at War, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/11494/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk ABSTRACT W.E.L. Broad: ‘Northumberland at War’. At the Battle of Towton in 1461 the Lancastrian forces of Henry VI were defeated by the Yorkist forces of Edward IV. However Henry VI, with his wife, son and a few knights, fled north and found sanctuary in Scotland, where, in exchange for the town of Berwick, the Scots granted them finance, housing and troops. Henry was therefore able to maintain a presence in Northumberland and his supporters were able to claim that he was in fact as well as in theory sovereign resident in Northumberland.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download the Reluctant Queen: the Story of Anne of York
    THE RELUCTANT QUEEN: THE STORY OF ANNE OF YORK PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Jean Plaidy | 450 pages | 28 Aug 2007 | Random House USA Inc | 9780307346155 | English | New York, United States The Reluctant Queen: The Story of Anne of York PDF Book It ends when our storyteller dies, so King Richard is still on the throne and it gives us no closure on the ending of his reign. Other editions. As a member of the powerful House of Neville , she played a critical part in the Wars of the Roses fought between the House of York and House of Lancaster for the English crown. I enjoyed all the drama that took place but I disliked the lack of a lesson, when reading a book I want to be left with a life lesson and I did not find one within this novel. While telling her story Anne notes that Middleham is where she feels at home and was most happy. She proves she can do this during a spell were Anne winds up in a cookshop. The reigning king Edward dies and Richard is to raise and guide Edward's son, Edward on the throne. Richard the Third. Anne was on good terms with her mother-in-law Cecily Neville, Duchess of York , with whom she discussed religious works, such as the writings of Mechtilde of Hackeborn. Ralph Neville, 1st Earl of Westmorland. Novels that feature Richard III tend to be either for or against the former king. This novel will be best suited for any students from grades 8 and up because of the vocabulary it uses, which many eighth graders and higher will already be accustomed with, hopefully.
    [Show full text]
  • Mark Scheme (Results)
    Mark Scheme (Results) January 2009 GCE GCE History (6HI01) Paper A Edexcel Limited. Registered in England and Wales No. 4496750 Registered Office: One90 High Holborn, London WC1V 7BH 6HI01/A GCE History January 2009 2 GCE History Marking Guidance Marking of Questions: Levels of Response The mark scheme provides an indication of the sorts of answer that might be found at different levels. The exemplification of content within these levels is not complete. It is intended as a guide and it will be necessary, therefore, for examiners to use their professional judgement in deciding both at which level a question has been answered and how effectively points have been sustained. Candidates should always be rewarded according to the quality of thought expressed in their answer and not solely according to the amount of knowledge conveyed. However candidates with only a superficial knowledge will be unable to develop or sustain points sufficiently to move to higher levels. In assessing the quality of thought, consider whether the answer: (i) is relevant to the question and is explicitly related to the question’s terms (ii) argues a case, when requested to do so (iii) is able to make the various distinctions required by the question (iv) has responded to all the various elements in the question (v) where required, explains, analyses, discusses, assesses, and deploys knowledge of the syllabus content appropriately, rather than simply narrates. Examiners should award marks both between and within levels according to the above criteria. This should be done in conjunction with the levels of response indicated in the mark schemes for particular questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Court Chivalry and Politics: Nominations and Elections to the Order of the Garter: 1461-83
    COURT CHIVALRY AND POLITICS: NOMINATIONS AND ELECTIONS TO THE ORDER OF THE GARTER: 1461-83 A Ph.D. Dissertation By T. Tolga GUMUS THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BİLKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA APRIL 2007 To Ekrem, Taskin, Ovgu and Orkun COURT CHIVALRY AND POLITICS: NOMINATIONS AND ELECTIONS TO THE ORDER OF THE GARTER: 1461-83 The Institute of Economics and Social Sciences of Bilkent University By T. Tolga GUMUS In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BİLKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA APRIL 2007 I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. --------------------------------- Assist. Prof. David E. Thornton Supervisor I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. --------------------------------- Assist. Prof. Paul Latimer Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. --------------------------------- Assist. Prof. Edward Kohn Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. --------------------------------- Assist. Prof. Julian Bennett Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosworth: the Dawn of the Tudors
    Bosworth: the dawn of the Tudors From childhood imprisonment in Brittany to the violent execution of Richard III in a Leicestershire field, Henry Tudor's passage to the throne was lengthy and labyrinthine. Chris Skidmore charts the origins of the Tudor dynasty This competition is now closed Wales, 7 August 1485. As the sun lowered beneath the horizon across the Milford estuary, a flotilla of ships drifted across the mouth of the Haven. It had been a week since the fleet had sailed from the shelter of the Seine at Honfleur, but the ships had made fast progress in the balmy August weather. Onboard, the soldiers waited. They included a rabble of 2,000 Breton and French soldiers (many only recently released from prison and, according to the chronicler Commynes, “the worst sort… raised out of the refuse of the people”). There were also a thousand Scottish troops and 400 Englishmen, whose last sight of the country had been two years previously, when they had fled in fear of their lives. The ships entered the mouth of the estuary where, looking leftwards, the dark red sandstone cliffs, several hundred feet in height and impossible to scale, gave way to a small cove hiddenrom sight from the cliffs above. High tide had passed an hour previously, enabling the ships to creep silently to the edge of the narrow shoreline, allowing the troops to disembark. Their arrival stirred no one. The waters soon clouded with sand as the men began to heave cannon, guns and ordnance from the boats, leading horses from the ships and onto land.
    [Show full text]