DOCSLIB.ORG

Marilyn Mccord Adams on Medieval and Modern Approaches

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Marilyn Mccord Adams on Medieval and Modern Approaches ONTOLOGICAL AND VALUE INCOMENSURATION: MARILYN MCCORD ADAMS ON MEDIEVAL AND MODERN APPROACHES TO THEODICY MICHAEL AJAY CHANDRA DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY THE UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH 2007 TEST 002006 DECLARATION I declare this thesis has been composed by me, it represents my own research, and it has not been submitted for any other degree or professional qualification. ~.A..~ Michael Ajay Chandra 1 April 2008 TEST 002008 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................... vi ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................................................vii ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................. ix INTRODUCTION 1. Biographical Sketch ............................................................................................ 1 2. Outline of Adams’s Project on Theodicy ............................................................ 2 3. Status of Question ............................................................................................. 11 4. Outline of Thesis ............................................................................................... 12 5. Textual and Critical Approach .......................................................................... 14 PART I. METAPHYSICS: GOD AND EVIL CHAPTER 1: CONTEMPORARY THEODICY AND MEDIEVAL THEORIES OF DIVINE TRANSCENDENCE 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................... 24 2. A Preliminary Objection ................................................................................... 26 3. Medieval Metaphysics in Adams’s Theodicy (1987-2004) .............................. 27 4. Medieval Approaches to Modern Problems ...................................................... 38 5. A Second Objection .......................................................................................... 48 6. Conclusion ........................................................................................................ 56 CHAPTER 2: MEDIEVAL CONFLICT ON DIVINE TRANSCENDENCE: SCOTUS VERSUS AQUINAS 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................... 57 2. Problems with Adams’s Account ...................................................................... 59 3. Medieval Motivations for the Doctrine of Divine Simplicity ........................... 63 4. Scotus’s Criticism of Aquinas on Divine Simplicity ........................................ 65 5. Aquinas on Naming God ................................................................................... 71 6. Scotus versus Aquinas on Divine Infinity ......................................................... 94 7. Conclusion ...................................................................................................... 105 iv CHAPTER 3: HORRENDOUS EVILS: TWO ACCOUNTS 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................... 109 2. Initial Distinctions: Overbalance/Defeat, Global/Individual .......................... 111 3. A Psychological Account ................................................................................ 114 4. A Parts-Whole Account .................................................................................. 117 5. Criticisms of Adams’s Two Accounts ............................................................ 122 6. Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 129 PART II. VALUE THEORY CHAPTER 4: AUGUSTINE AND MORALIST VALUE THEORIES 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................... 132 2. Augustine’s Free Will Approach to Evil ........................................................ 134 3. Adams’s Criticisms of Augustine ................................................................... 137 4. Augustinian and Modern Moralities ............................................................... 150 5. Moral Responsibility ....................................................................................... 156 6. Evil’s Origin .................................................................................................... 173 7. Just Deserts ..................................................................................................... 182 8. Conclusion ...................................................................................................... 187 CHAPTER 5: THE DEFEASIBILITY OF MORALITY: HUME AND THE FRANCISCAN ARISTOTELIANS 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................... 191 2. Metaphysical Misfits and Moral Pragmatism ................................................. 192 3. Hume on Justice .............................................................................................. 198 4. Scotus and Ockham on Morality’s Defeasibility ............................................ 206 5. Impaired Freedom and Franciscan Via Eminentia .......................................... 211 6. Participation and Moral Philosophy ................................................................ 213 7. Conclusion ...................................................................................................... 231 CONCLUSION 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................... 233 2. Summary of Argument ................................................................................... 233 3. Medieval Lessons for Modern Thinkers ......................................................... 238 BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................... 248 v TEST 002010 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The debts that I have incurred during the writing of this thesis are many. Many staff and students of the School of Divinity, University of Edinburgh, helped me during the last six years. In particular, my primary supervisor Nicholas S. Adams provided keen comments and showed patience and trust. He introduced me to the writings of the Cambridge theologians Rowan Williams, Gillian Evans, Nicholas Lash, and John Milbank. I learned much from my secondary supervisor Fergus Kerr about how to read Catholic theology and analytic philosophy profitably and together. Michael Northcott graciously invited me to present a draft of my chapter on horrendous evils at a Theology and Ethics Research Seminar in October 2004. Seminar participants provided valuable responses and questions. The School of Divinity Scholarship Committee made awards that supported this study between 2001 and 2004. I met with Marilyn Adams twice in the United Kingdom and once in Canada. My thanks to Theodore Scaltsas and the School of Philosophy, University of Edinburgh, who included me in an evening’s entertainment of Marilyn and Bob Adams in May 2004. Marilyn Adams met with me at Oxford University in July 2005 to discuss a chapter and the overall project, and she later read a submission copy of my thesis and provided comments through correspondence. She followed-up with me at the University of Toronto in March 2006. Professor Adams is exemplary in her hospitality, inquisitiveness, openness to disputation, and encouragement. I had several valuable exchanges about the early chapters of this thesis with Mark R. Talbot at Wheaton College and the Most Reverend Chrysostomos of Etna from the Center for Traditionalist Orthodox Studies. My thesis examiners, Oliver Davies and David Fergusson, pressed non-medieval counterpoints that I had not encountered. I am indebted to them for widening the range of readings of Adams that I now must consider and for their assistance in completing the thesis process. I am grateful to many friends who provided love, encouragement, meals, and humor during my four years of study. Among the closest are Catherene Babu and her family, Sean Doyle, Andrew and Henriette McFarlane, and Margaret Acton. The kind help of the McFarlanes, the Bartons, and the Promods, enabled me to complete this study. Through their generous prayers, financial support, and constant friendship, my parents Michael and Lynette Chandra made all these things possible. To them I owe a special thanks. vi TEST 002011 ABBREVIATIONS PRIMARY SOURCES Anselm CDH Cur Deus Homo De Casu Diab. De Casu Diaboli De Conc. Virg. De Conceptu Virginali Mon. Monologion Pros. Proslogion Aquinas De Malo De Malo Sent. Scriptum super Libros Sententiarum SCG Summa contra Gentiles ST Summa Theologiae Augustine De Doct. Chr. De Doctrina Christiana De Civ. Dei De Civitate Dei De Lib. Arb. De Libero Arbitrio De Trin. De Trinitate In Evan. Ioan. In Evangelium Ioannis Tractatus Retr. Retractionum Libri Duo Calvin Inst. Christianae Religionis Institutio Duns Scotus De Prim. Prin. De Primo Principio Lect. Lectura In Metaph. Quaestiones super Libros Metaphysicorum Aristotelis Ord. Ordinatio Rep. 1A Reportatio Parisiensis 1A Hume Treatise A Treatise of Human Nature Enquiry An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals Julian of Norwich Shew. Shewings of Divine Love William Ockham Ord. Ordinatio vii TEST 002012 VERSIONS AND TRANSLATIONS Beauchamp 1998 Hume, David. 1998. An enquiry concerning the principles of morals. Oxford Philosophical Texts. Edited by Tom L. Beauchamp. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Frank
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Scholarships and Special Funds 1 Scholarships and Special Funds
    Scholarships and Special Funds 1 Scholarships and Special Funds An asterisk (*) indicates a scholarship or special fund that was transferred by Andover Newton Theological School (now Andover Newton Seminary at Yale Divinity School) in 2019. Scholarships The Bradford E. Ableson Scholarship was established in 2008 by Julia Ableson to honor her husband, the Rev. Dr. Bradford Edward Ableson, M.Div. 1985. The scholarship is awarded annually with a preference for students who are postulants or candidates for Holy Orders of the Episcopal Church and demonstrate superior promise for pastoral ministry. The Harry Baker Adams Scholarship was created in 1993 by a gi from Frank P. Wendt, charter member and chairman emeritus of the Yale Divinity School Board of Advisors. The scholarship has since been augmented by numerous gis from other friends, students, and admirers of Professor Harry B. Adams, B.A. 1947, B.D. 1951, who has touched the lives of so many who have attended the School. The purpose of the scholarship is to attract “the brightest and the best.” The Rev. Dr. Marilyn McCord Adams Scholarship Fund was established in 2020 by the Rev. Christopher T. Worthley, M.Div. 2002, and Christian M. Clough, M.A.R. 2003, for the benefit of deserving students affiliated with Berkeley Divinity School at Yale. *The Rev. Dr. Paul R. Adkins Scholarship is awarded with a preference toward United Church of Christ students and students in the Andover Newton Seminary program. The African Methodist Episcopal Church Scholarship was established in 2007 by Bishop Frederick Hilborn Talbot, M.Div. 1957, and his friends and family to honor him for receiving the YDS “Lux et Veritas” Alumni Award.
    [Show full text]
  • "Why Adams Needs to Modify His Divine-Command Theory One More Time"
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Asbury Theological Seminary Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers Volume 11 Issue 1 Article 5 1-1-1994 "Why Adams Needs to Modify His Divine-Command Theory One More Time" Stephen J. Sullivan Follow this and additional works at: https://place.asburyseminary.edu/faithandphilosophy Recommended Citation Sullivan, Stephen J. (1994) ""Why Adams Needs to Modify His Divine-Command Theory One More Time"," Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers: Vol. 11 : Iss. 1 , Article 5. Available at: https://place.asburyseminary.edu/faithandphilosophy/vol11/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers by an authorized editor of ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. "WHY ADAMS NEEDS TO MODIFY HIS DIVINE­ COMMAND THEORY ONE MORE TIME"* Stephen J. Sullivan Robert Merrihew Adams has twice modified the divine-command theory of morality in interesting and plausible ways. The resulting theory says that rightness and wrongness consist respectively in agreement and disagreement with the commands of a loving God, and that a causallhistorical account of the reference of moral terms is correct. I argue, first, that Adams's theory must face up to the objection that it depicts morality-implausibly-as arbi­ trary; second, that the account of reference he accepts does not permit him to adopt either of two natural strategies for rebutting the objection; and finally, that this account does allow him recourse to a third, somewhat less natural strategy which requires modifying the theory one more time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Problem of Evil in Augustine's Confessions
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2011 The rP oblem of Evil in Augustine's Confessions Edward Matusek University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons, and the Philosophy Commons Scholar Commons Citation Matusek, Edward, "The rP oblem of Evil in Augustine's Confessions" (2011). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/3733 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Problem of Evil in Augustine’s Confessions by Edward A. Matusek A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Thomas Williams, Ph.D. Roger Ariew, Ph.D. Joanne Waugh, Ph.D. Charles B. Guignon, Ph.D. Date of Approval: November 14, 2011 Keywords: theodicy, privation, metaphysical evil, Manichaeism, Neo-Platonism Copyright © 2011, Edward A. Matusek i TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract iii Chapter One: Introduction to Augustine’s Confessions and the Present Study 1 Purpose and Background of the Study 2 Literary and Historical Considerations of Confessions 4 Relevance of the Study for Various
    [Show full text]
  • The Problem of Evil
    The Problem of Evil PHIL6305 New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary Defend Conference January 2-6, 2017 Office: Dodd 112, extension #3245 [email protected] Assistant: Katy Platt [email protected] Seminary Mission Statement The mission of New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary is to equip leaders to fulfill the Great Commission and the Great Commandments through the local church and its ministries. Course Description The course introduces students to contemporary philosophical issues related to the Christian concept of God and the problem of evil. Issues addressed include the nature of evil, the cause of evil, the intelligibility and coherence of the Christian concept of God in light of evil, solutions offered by various world religions to the problem of evil, as well as representative solutions offered by a selection of contemporary philosophers addressing the topic of evil. The thrust of the course will focus upon personal reading, research, and writing. Core Value and Key Competency The primary core value of the Seminary addressed in this course is Doctrinal Integrity. The primary key competency in ministry addressed is Christian Theological Heritage. The core value for the 2016-2017 academic year is Characteristic Excellence. Core Values Addressed The course will address the core value of Doctrinal Integrity directly and Spiritual Vitality indirectly. Reflection on the problem of evil is intimately related to reflection on the nature and existence of God as well as to considering the doctrine of creation. The vitality of one’s spiritual life is directly related to the degree of trust one places in God, which derives from one’s understanding of God’s nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecclesiology of the Anglican Communion: Rediscovering the Radical and Transnational Nature of the Anglican Communion
    A (New) Ecclesiology of the Anglican Communion: Rediscovering the Radical and Transnational Nature of the Anglican Communion Guillermo René Cavieses Araya Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds Faculty of Arts School of Philosophy, Religion and History of Science February 2019 1 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from this thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. © 2019 The University of Leeds and Guillermo René Cavieses Araya The right of Guillermo René Cavieses Araya to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by Guillermo René Cavieses Araya in accordance with the Copyright, Design and Patents Act 1988. 2 Acknowledgements No man is an island, and neither is his work. This thesis would not have been possible without the contribution of a lot of people, going a long way back. So, let’s start at the beginning. Mum, thank you for teaching me that it was OK for me to dream of working for a circus when I was little, so long as I first went to University to get a degree on it. Dad, thanks for teaching me the value of books and a solid right hook. To my other Dad, thank you for teaching me the virtue of patience (yes, I know, I am still working on that one).
    [Show full text]
  • Kierkegaard on Selfhood and Our Need for Others
    Kierkegaard on Selfhood and Our Need for Others 1. Kierkegaard in a Secular Age Scholars have devoted much attention lately to Kierkegaard’s views on personal identity and, in particular, to his account of selfhood.1 Central to this account is the idea that a self is not something we automatically are. It is rather something we must become. Thus, selfhood is a goal to realize or a project to undertake.2 To put the point another way, while we may already be selves in some sense, we have to work to become real, true, or “authentic” selves.3 The idea that authentic selfhood is a project is not unique to Kierkegaard. It is common fare in modern philosophy. Yet Kierkegaard distances himself from popular ways of thinking about the matter. He denies the view inherited from Rousseau that we can discover our true selves by consulting our innermost feelings, beliefs, and desires. He also rejects the idea developed by the German Romantics that we can invent our true selves in a burst of artistic or poetic creativity. In fact, according to Kierkegaard, becom- ing an authentic self is not something we can do on our own. If we are to succeed at the project, we must look beyond ourselves for assistance. In particular, Kierkegaard thinks, we must rely on God. For God alone can provide us with the content of our real identi- ties.4 A longstanding concern about Kierkegaard arises at this point. His account of au- thentic selfhood, like his accounts of so many concepts, is religious.
    [Show full text]
  • John Ford Wilson UNISA Student Number
    John Ford Wilson UNISA Student Number: 4593-816-4 275 Elkins Lake Huntsville, Texas 77340 USA 1-713-202-8953 [email protected] Approved Thesis Title: Examination of the Work of John C. Polkinghorne Praeparatio Evangelii Supervisor: Professor William J. Abraham Co-supervisor: Professor Vaughn Willard Baker Date of Submission of Thesis: i Curriculum Vitae John Ford Wilson Curriculum Vitae EDUCATION Ph.D. Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas M.S. Physics, Drexel Institute of Technology, Philadelphia, Pa. M.S. Theological Studies, Perkins School of Theology at Southern Methodist University M.S. Industrial Management, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana. B.S. Electrical Engineering, University of Tennessee. EXPERIENCE Lecturer, Department of Physics, Sam Houston State University; Huntsville, Texas Member The Institute on Religion in an Age of Science Fellow, Center of Faith and Culture at University of St. Thomas; Houston, Texas Adjunct Faculty for Institute for Spirituality and Health, Houston, Texas Associate Pastor for Evangelism, St. Luke’s United Methodist Church; Houston, Texas Ordained Deacon in Texas Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church Research Assistant Professor of Physics and Director of Educational Outreach, University of Houston; Houston, Texas Professor of Physics Houston Community College System; Houston, Texas Adjunct Professor of Physics University of St. Thomas; Houston, Texas Wilson and Associates: Self-employed as consultant in Houston, Tx. for marketing, business and strategic planning, and investment management. E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. Marketing Division, DuPont Textile Fibers Dept: Technical Service Manager for Reemay® and Typar®. Marketing Manager for Reemay®, Typar®, and Sontara®. Strategy and Development Assistant for Nomex® fiber and paper; responsible for business plans, earnings, and forecast.
    [Show full text]
  • Why William Rowe's Argument from Natural Evil Fails
    Scholars Crossing Other Graduate Scholarship School of Divinity 2015 Why William Rowe’s Argument from Natural Evil Fails Douglas Taylor Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lts_grad_schol Part of the Christianity Commons, Metaphysics Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Taylor, Douglas, "Why William Rowe’s Argument from Natural Evil Fails" (2015). Other Graduate Scholarship. 2. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lts_grad_schol/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Divinity at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Other Graduate Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LIBERTY UNIVERSITY BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY Why William Rowe’s Argument from Natural Evil Fails Submitted to the Evangelical Theological Society Southeastern Region Meeting by Doug Taylor February 14, 2015 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................3 BUILDING THE THEODICY ............................................................................................6 Culpability ...................................................................................................................6 Growth .........................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Inquiry Into the Meaning of Sin and Faith: with on My Religion Free
    FREE A BRIEF INQUIRY INTO THE MEANING OF SIN AND FAITH: WITH ON MY RELIGION PDF John Rawls,Joshua Cohen,Thomas Nagel,Robert Merrihew Adams | 288 pages | 20 May 2010 | HARVARD UNIVERSITY PRESS | 9780674047532 | English | Cambridge, Mass, United States A Brief Inquiry into the Meaning of Sin & Faith with On My Religion by John Rawls Sign in Create an account. Syntax Advanced Search. JohnHG Rawls. Harvard University Press Faith in Philosophy of Religion. Edit this record. Mark as duplicate. Find it on Scholar. Request removal from index. Revision history. Download options PhilArchive copy. From the Publisher via CrossRef no proxy Setup an account with your affiliations in A Brief Inquiry into the Meaning of Sin and Faith: With On My Religion to access resources via your University's proxy server Configure custom proxy use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy. Configure custom resolver. Chapters BETA. Robert Merrihew Adams. A Note on the Text. Chapter Four. The Meaning of Sin. Chapter Five. The Meaning of Faith. Chapter One. A General Prospectus. Chapter A Brief Inquiry into the Meaning of Sin and Faith: With On My Religion. The Extended Natural Cosmos. Chapter Two. Vindication of the Natural Cosmos. General Index. Index of Biblical Passages. On My Religion. Epistemology Personalized. Matthew A. Benton - - Philosophical Quarterly 67 God and Interpersonal Knowledge. Benton - - Res Philosophica 95 3 Kristina Stoeckl - - Philosophy and Social Criticism 43 1 Mackenzie Bok - - Modern Intellectual History 14 1 Harvard University Press. John Rawls - - Harvard University Press. Added to PP index Total views 13of 2, Recent downloads 6 months 2of 2, How can I increase my downloads? Sign in to use this feature.
    [Show full text]
  • The Problem of Evil and the Limits of Governmental Power
    Liberty University Law Review Volume 5 Issue 3 Article 3 July 2011 Lessons from Theodicy: The Problem of Evil and the Limits of Governmental Power David E. Gilbert Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lu_law_review Recommended Citation Gilbert, David E. (2011) "Lessons from Theodicy: The Problem of Evil and the Limits of Governmental Power," Liberty University Law Review: Vol. 5 : Iss. 3 , Article 3. Available at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lu_law_review/vol5/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Liberty University School of Law at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Liberty University Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLE LESSONS FROM THEODICY: THE PROBLEM OF EVIL AND THE LIMITS OF GOVERNMENTAL POWER David E. Gilbert† Why is there any misery at all in the world? Not by chance, surely. From some cause then. Is it from the intention of the Diety? But he is perfectly benevolent. Is it contrary to his intention? But he is almighty. Nothing can shake the solidity of this reasoning, so short, so clear, so decisive, except we assert that these subjects exceed all human capacity, and that our common measures of truth and falsehood are not applicable to them. 1 David Hume, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion I. INTRODUCTION Although I teach law, I am fascinated by the philosophy of religion. And I am fascinated, in particular, by the Problem of Evil, which asserts that the 2 following propositions cannot be reconciled: † A version of this article was presented on May 31, 2010 at a symposium entitled “The Monotheistic Religions and the Human Liberties.” The symposium was held in Constantza, Romania and was sponsored by The Centre for Religious and Juridical- Canonical Study and Research of the Three Monotheistic Religions (Mosaic, Christian and Islamic) of Ovidius University of Constantza.
    [Show full text]
  • Higher Diploma in Theological Studies
    Higher Diploma in Theological Studies Course Director: Fr. Neil Xavier O’Donoghue, Ph.D. This one-year, evening/weekend, Level 8, 65 ECTS credits programme gives a foundation in Theological Studies to students who hold a primary degree in another discipline. This Higher Diploma meets all the Teaching Council of Ireland’s Requirements for the teaching of Religious Studies at post-primary level. It entitles teachers holding Department-recognised degrees and teacher training qualifications to teach up to 15 hours’ Religious Education per week in a secondary school. The Higher Diploma in Theological Studies from St. Patrick’s College Maynooth attests to the completion of a substantial and coherent programme of learning. The Higher Diploma allows students to finish an accredited introductory programme in theology and to obtain a credential for it. Other students may use the programme as a gateway to applying to a Masters programme in Theology or Pastoral Ministry either here in Maynooth or elsewhere (students interested in entering a Master’s programme are advised to speak with the Admissions Office prior to starting the HDip for further details). Others may be interested in the programme simply as a structured way to approach the big questions in life, giving their personal inquiry a theological shape in the Catholic tradition. St. Patrick’s College Maynooth is proud to have the largest faculty of Catholic theology in Great Britain and Ireland. A full range of theological and religious studies courses are studied in the programme, including: A general introduction to theology, giving students the necessary foundations for an academic treatment of theology in accordance with St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mendicant Preachers and the Merchant's Soul
    MARK HANSSEN THE MENDICANT PREACHERS AND THE MERCHANT'S SOUL THE CIVILIZATION OF COMMERCE IN THE LATE- MIDDLE AGES AND RENAISSANCE ITALY (1275-1425) Tesis doctoral dirigida por PROF. DR. MIGUEL ALFONSO MARTÍNEZ-ECHEVARRÍA Y ORTEGA PROF. DR. ANTONIO MORENO ALMÁRCEGUI FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS ECONÓMICAS Y EMPRESARIALES PAMPLONA, 2014 Table of contents Prologue .......................................................................................................... 7 PART I: BACKGROUND Chapter 1: Introduction The Merchant in the Wilderness ............................. 27 1. Economic Autarky and Carolingian Political "Augustinianism" ........................ 27 2. The Commercial Revolution ................................................................................ 39 3. Eschatology and Civilization ............................................................................... 54 4. Plan of the Work .................................................................................................. 66 Chapter 2: Theology and Civilization ........................................................... 73 1. Theology and Humanism ..................................................................................... 73 2. Christianity and Classical Culture ...................................................................... 83 3. Justice, Commerce and Political Society............................................................. 95 PART II: SCHOLASTIC PHILOSOPHICAL-THEOLOGY, ETHICS AND POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY Introduction................................................................................................
    [Show full text]