Baseline Survey Report on Inclusive Governance for Service Delivery and Social Accountability Project (Ig Project)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
BASELINE SURVEY REPORT ON INCLUSIVE GOVERNANCE FOR SERVICE DELIVERY AND SOCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT (IG PROJECT) Final – 30 April 2019 Khim Phearum Solid Waste Management Consultant Inclusive Governance Baseline Survey, UNDP 2019 Page 1 Table of Contents List of Acronyms .......................................................................................................................... 5 Acknowledgements...................................................................................................................... 6 1. Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 7 2. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 9 3. Literature review ................................................................................................................ 10 3.1. Environmental context with focus on waste management and pollution in general in Cambodia ...................................................................................................................................... 10 3.2. Relevant policy, strategies and regulation related to Good Governance, D&D, SWM and gender equality ............................................................................................................................. 11 4. Scope of Work .................................................................................................................... 12 5. Baseline Survey Methodology ............................................................................................. 13 5.1. Baseline Survey Sampling Strategy ....................................................................................... 13 5.1.1. Sampling...................................................................................................................... 13 5.1.2. Data collection and tools ............................................................................................ 13 5.1.3. Populations and Surveyed Areas ................................................................................ 13 5.1.4. Number of local government official participated in focus group discussion (FGD) .. 14 6. Key findings ........................................................................................................................ 15 6.1. Legal framework ................................................................................................................... 15 6.2. Baseline data identified and key findings against Project Indicators (Logframe) ................ 16 6.2.1. % of DM/CS councilors and officials reporting improvement in their performance as a result of training and other capacity development supports they receive from the project (by sex, age) – Indicator 1.1 ........................................................................... 16 6.2.2. Extent to which the design/development of key UNDP’s supported local governance services is inclusive and participatory - Indicator 1.2 ................................................. 16 6.2.3. Number of local citizen access to SWM collection services (waste regularly collected according to the guideline set) - Indicator 1.3 ............................................................ 20 6.2.4. Number of small business access to SWM collection services (waste regularly collected according to the guideline set) - Indicator 1.4. ........................................... 21 6.2.5. Number of complaints filed relating to SWM - Indicator 2.1 ..................................... 22 6.2.6. Percentage of complaints relating to SWM that are addressed - Indicator 2.2 ......... 22 6.2.7. Number of new DM/CS adopting the SWM model developed and tested under the project (structure and WP in place) - Indicator 3.1 .................................................... 23 6.2.8. Number of new DM/CS plans to adopt the SWM model developed and tested under the project (DM/CS leader decision) - Indicator 3.2 ................................................... 23 1. Conclusion and Recommendations ...................................................................................... 24 2. Work plan .......................................................................................................................... 25 Inclusive Governance Baseline Survey, UNDP 2019 Page 2 3. Annexes: ............................................................................................................................ 26 Annex 1: Structure of SWM .......................................................................................................... 26 Annex 2: Indicator Definitions for LOGOD Survey ........................................................................ 27 Annex 3: Additional data generation and graphs were prepared for BRH of UNDP .................... 29 Annex 4: List of Coding ................................................................................................................. 34 Annex 5: Data Collection Tools ..................................................................................................... 36 Annex 5: Sample size of SWM Baseline Survey ............................................................................ 65 Annex 6: List of surveyors and respondents ................................................................................. 66 Annex 7: Project Result Framework and Indicators ..................................................................... 69 Annex 6: Sample of letter sent to DMs ......................................................................................... 71 References: ................................................................................................................................ 74 Inclusive Governance Baseline Survey, UNDP 2019 Page 3 List of Figures: Figure 1: Map of target DM/CS ............................................................................................................. 12 Figure 2: Number of FGDs conducted based on selected CS in DM ..................................................... 14 Figure 3: Number of interviewed households rated the level of efficiency of SWM service delivery . 19 Figure 4: Number of HHs participated (have contributed) in the following consultation during the last 12 months ............................................................................................................................................. 20 Figure 5: Regularity of SWM collection services at HH level ................................................................ 20 Figure 6: Number of complaints relating to SWM have been filed and addressed .............................. 23 List of Tables: Table 1: List of field survey and sample size (number of households interviewed) ............................. 14 Table 2: Number of interviewed local government officials ................................................................ 14 Table 3: Number of interviewed household representative by age group .......................................... 15 Table 4: Number and percentage of local government performance reported improved .................. 16 Table 5: Engagement of vulnerable people and youth in the DM/CS planning, budgeting, and monitoring process (HH interview) – overall of 3 DMs ........................................................................ 17 Table 6: Engagement of vulnerable people and youth in the DM/CS planning, budgeting, and monitoring process (HH interview) – for Angsnoul district .................................................................. 17 Table 7: Engagement of vulnerable people and youth in the DM/CS planning, budgeting, and monitoring process (HH interview) – for Kampong Tralach district ..................................................... 17 Table 8: Engagement of vulnerable people and youth in the DM/CS planning, budgeting, and monitoring process (HH interview) – for Stung Treng municipal ......................................................... 18 Table 9: Level of extent to which the design/development of key UNDP’s support local governance (FGD) ..................................................................................................................................................... 18 Table 10: Community people rated the efficiency SWM services (HH interview) ............................... 19 Table 11: Monthly fees on SWM service that local administration has applies (by HH interview) ...... 19 Table 12: Number and percentage of local citizen and small business households have access to SWM collection services (by village) ..................................................................................................... 22 Inclusive Governance Baseline Survey, UNDP 2019 Page 4 List of Acronyms BRH Bangkok Regional Hub COMPED Cambodian Education and Waste Management Organization CS Commune/Sangkat CSARO Community Sanitation and Recycling Organization DM District/Municipality DPWT Department of Public Work and Transport GDP Gross Domestic Product IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change MoE Ministry of Environment MoEF Ministry of Economy and Finance MoI Ministry of Interior MoP Ministry of Planning MPP Municipality of Phnom Penh MSW Municipal Solid Waste NIS National Institute of Statistics (Cambodia) PPWM Phnom Penh Waste Management PRD Partner for Research and Development SEDO Socio-Economic Development Organization SWM Solid Waste Management TAF The