G7 Elmau Progress Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

G7 Elmau Progress Report G7 Elmau Progress Report Biodiversity – A vital foundation for sustainable development Baobab trees, scientific name Adansonia, are recognizable from their distinctively broad trunks. Occurring naturally in the arid zones of continental Africa, Madagascar and Australia, the trees store massive amounts of water in their trunks to cope with seasonal droughts. The fruit of the Baobab is shaped like a large pod and known as “monkey bread” or “cream of tartar fruit” and is rich in vitamin C. Gil.K/Shutterstock This report was prepared by Germany as chair of the G7 Accountability Working Group. It reflects the consensus of this group. In the preparation, the German government was supported by a team of researchers from the department Environmental Policy and Natural Resources Management of the German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE), Bonn, and from the Science-Policy Expert Group at the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Leipzig. However, sole responsibility for the text rests with Germany as chair of the G7 Accountability Working Group. G7 ELMAU PROGRESS REPORT CONTENTS Foreword ....................................................................................VII Key political messages .........................................................................VIII Executive summary .............................................................................IX 1.. Biodiversity, development and the G7...........................................................1 2. The global status of biodiversity, the drivers of biodiversity loss and impacts on human well-being .........6 2.1 The importance of biodiversity for human well-being and poverty reduction........................8 2.2 Biodiversity – status and trends ..........................................................10 2.3 The drivers of biodiversity loss...........................................................11 3. G7 international biodiversity priorities and funding by country .....................................14 3.1 Introduction ........................................................................16 3.2 Overview ...........................................................................18 3.3 Canada .............................................................................20 3.4 France .............................................................................22 3.5 Germany ...........................................................................24 3.6 Italy ...............................................................................26 3.7 Japan ..............................................................................28 3.8 United Kingdom .....................................................................30 3.9 United States ........................................................................32 3.10 European Union ......................................................................34 G7 ELMAU PROGRESS REPORT 4. G7 approaches and good practices to reduce the loss of biodiversity ..................................38 4.1 Directly improving the state of biodiversity .................................................40 4.2 Addressing the direct drivers of biodiversity loss .............................................46 4.3 Addressing the indirect drivers of biodiversity...............................................49 4.4 Enhancing benefits from biodiversity and ecosystem services to society ...........................55 5. Interlinkages with other G7 commitments ......................................................60 5.1 Biodiversity and food security ...........................................................62 5.2 Biodiversity and human health ..........................................................68 5.3 Biodiversity and climate change .........................................................73 6. Discussion and conclusions ..................................................................80 References ...................................................................................85 Annex A: List of active G7 commitments.............................................................88 Annex B: List of abbreviations.....................................................................94 Annex C: Boxes, tables, figures and examples .........................................................96 G7 ELMAU PROGRESS REPORT We are ... committed to intensifying our efforts to slow the loss of biodiversity. 2011 Deauville Summit Rice terraces. Banaue, Philippines. UFZ/André Künzelmann G7 ELMAU PROGRESS REPORT VII FOREWORD Without intact ecosystems and biodiversity, there can be The G7 nations realize that the preservation of vital natural no good life and no future for humankind on our planet. resources is essential to reach a large number of other Ecosystems are not just living environments and spaces of development goals in areas such as food security, climate recreation for us. They are also an important resource, for and health. instance for producing food and medicinal substances. Intact ecosystems protect us from flooding, prevent erosion This is why the G7 countries made a commitment to protect and foster soil formation. They regulate the Earth’s climate biodiversity – not only within their national borders, but system and its water and nutrient cycles. Often, intelligent also internationally and together with their partners. In the solutions from our natural environment serve as models present report, the G7 countries provide an account of what for materials, technologies and processes that we use on a they have already accomplished along that road. This in- daily basis. Not least, the jobs and livelihoods of billions of cludes activities ranging from cross-border nature conser- people depend on ecosystems – especially those of poor vation to taking the economics of biodiversity benefits into people. account in political decision-making. But these vital resources for the survival of current and The challenge of our time is to share our planet’s wealth of future generations can only be protected if we halt the con- resources so that all people may live with dignity, and to tinuing destruction of biodiversity. Ecosystems are coming respect the boundaries of our planet so that future genera- under increasing pressure as a result of population growth tions may continue to live here and prosper. and non-sustainable production and consumption pat- terns. They are becoming weaker. Without biodiversity and intact ecosystems, sustainable development and poverty reduction on a global scale will not be possible. Dr Gerd Müller Federal Minister for Economic Cooperation and Development VIII G7 ELMAU PROGRESS REPORT Biodiversity – A vital foundation for sustainable development Key political messages • The G7 acknowledges the importance of biodiversity for human well-being, sustainable development and poverty alleviation. • The G7 has acted on its commitment through policies, finance and other means to protect species and their habitats while also addressing the multiple causes of biodiversity loss. • The G7 is aware that significant challenges still need to be tackled in order to improve the status of biodiversity and ecosystems worldwide. G7 ELMAU PROGRESS REPORT IX Executive summary Biodiversity – the variety of life on Earth – underpins First, G7 action is visible in financial terms: G7 countries delivery of nature’s services. Ecosystems and the goods account for almost half of all bilateral biodiversity aid. and services they provide form the foundation on which Every G7 country ranks among the top 10 donors to the every society and economy is built. Biodiversity enables Global Environment Facility. Some G7 members have a range of vital services, including the provision of clean more than doubled their contributions to international water and air, food, medicinal herbs and other medical biodiversity finance. Overall, the G7 has shown relatively products, flood protection, crop pollination and resilience to stable financial support for biodiversity in developing drought as well as the provision of resources to support eco- countries – a strong signal, given the impact of the financial nomic growth. The poor often depend more heavily on crisis and its aftermath. Second, the G7 has taken signifi- nature and the services it provides; consequently, the loss of cant measures to directly conserve biodiversity: supporting these natural resources affects them more severely. the management of protected areas and the establishment of ecological corridors; fighting poaching, illegal logging and The loss of biodiversity and the ecosystem services it pro- wildlife trafficking. Third, the G7 has attacked some crucial vides is continuing in many geographical areas at an alarm- direct drivers of biodiversity change by helping to control ing rate, although significant improvements have also invasive alien species and promoting the sustainable use been observed, as highlighted by the recent Global Biodi- of natural resources. Fourth, the G7 has also started to versity Outlook 4. With the challenge of biodiversity loss address the main indirect drivers of biodiversity loss, in mind, the G7 committed in 2011 to intensifying its efforts namely by changing consumer incentives, making to slow the loss of biodiversity. The group explicitly set this knowledge available about the multiple values of natural commitment in the context of related development goals: capital in order to support decision-making, and developing human
Recommended publications
  • Where Crime Compounds Conflict
    WHERE CRIME COMPOUNDS CONFLICT Understanding northern Mozambique’s vulnerabilities SIMONE HAYSOM October 2018 WHERE CRIME COMPOUNDS CONFLICT Understanding northern Mozambique’s vulnerabilities Simone Haysom October 2018 Cover photo: iStock/Katiekk2 Pemba, Mozambique: ranger with a gun looking at feet of elephants after poachers had killed the animals for illegal ivory trade © 2018 Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the Global Initiative. Please direct inquiries to: The Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime WMO Building, 2nd Floor 7bis, Avenue de la Paix CH-1211 Geneva 1 Switzerland www.GlobalInitiative.net Contents Summary and key findings ..............................................................................................................................................1 Background .........................................................................................................................................................................................2 The militants and funding from the illicit economy .......................................................................................4 Methodology .....................................................................................................................................................................................5 Corrosion, grievance and opportunity: A detailed picture
    [Show full text]
  • E-Development: from Excitement to Effectiveness
    34147 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized E-Development: From Excitement to Effectiveness Edited by Robert Schware Prepared for the World Summit on the Information Society Tunis, November 2005 Global Information and Communication Technologies Department THE WORLD BANK GROUP Washington, D.C. i E-Development: From Excitement to Efficiency ©2005 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org E-mail: [email protected] All rights reserved This volume is a product of the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgement on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA; telephone: 978-750-8400; fax: 978-750-4470; Internet: www.copyright.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses Integrated rural development a case study of monastir governorate Tunisia Harrison, Ian C. How to cite: Harrison, Ian C. (1982) Integrated rural development a case study of monastir governorate Tunisia, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/9340/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk INTEGRATED RURAL DEVELOPMENT A CASE STUDY OP MONASTIR GOVERNORATE TUNISIA IAN C. HARRISON The copyright of this thesis tests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without bis prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD, Department of Geography, University of Durham. March 1982. ABSTRACT The Tunisian government has adopted an integrated rural development programme to tackle the problems of the national rural sector. The thesis presents an examination of the viability and success of the programme with specific reference to the Governorate of Monastir.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 4: Regional Development Plan
    PART 4: REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Chapter 1 Overall Conditions of the Study Area The Study on Upgrading of Nampula – Cuamba Road FINAL REPORT in the Republic of Mozambique November 2007 PART 4: REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Chapter 1 Overall Conditions of the Study Area 1.1 Existing Conditions of the Study Area The Study area consists of the two provinces of Niassa and Nampula. The total length of the Study road is approximately 350 km. In this chapter, overall conditions of the study area are described in order to prepare a regional development plan and to analyze economic, social and financial viability. The Nacala Corridor, which extends to Malawi through the Nampula and Niassa Provinces of Mozambique from Nacala Port, serves as a trucking route that connects northern agricultural zones with important cities and/or towns. In the rainy season, which is from November to April, the region has a high rainfall ranging from 1,200 to 2,000 mm. As the Study road is an unpaved road, it is frequently impassable during the rainy season, affecting the transportation of crops during this period. Looking at the 3 regions in Mozambique, results of the economic performance study conducted by UNDP over the period under analysis continue to show heavy economic concentration in the southern region of the country, with an average of about 47% of real production as can be seen in Figure 1.1.1. Within the southern region, Maputo City stands out with a contribution in real terms of about 20.8%. The central region follows, with a contribution of 32%, and finally, the northern region with only 21% of national production.
    [Show full text]
  • IOM Country Strategy for Mozambique: 2021-2023
    IOM MOZAMBIQUE IOM COUNTRY STRATEGY FOR MOZAMBIQUE 2021 – 2023 IOM MOZAMBIQUE IOM COUNTRY STRATEGY FOR MOZAMBIQUE 2021 – 2023 The opinions expressed in the report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the International Organization for Migration (IOM). The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout the report do not imply expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IOM concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning its frontiers or boundaries. IOM is committed to the principle that humane and orderly migration benefits migrants and society. As an intergovernmental organization, IOM acts with its partners in the international community to: assist in meeting the operational challenges of migration; advance understanding of migration issues; encourage social and economic development through migration; and uphold the human dignity and well-being of migrants. Publisher: International Organization for Migration 139, Rua Joseph Kizerbo Maputo Mozambique Email: [email protected] Website: mozambique.iom.int This publication was issued without formal editing by IOM. Report design by We2 – www.we2.co Cover photo: IOM‘s DTM teams help local authorities in Paquitequete, Pemba, register internally displaced persons who fled insecurity in northern Cabo Delgado. From 16 October to 11 November 2020, over 14,400 internally displaced persons arrived at Pemba’s Paquitequete beach by boat. Boat arrivals to the provincial capital peaked with 29 in a single day in late October. © IOM 2021/Matteo THEUBET Required Citation: International Organization for Migration (IOM), 2021. IOM Country Strategy for Mozambique 2021-2023.
    [Show full text]
  • Tunisia Fragil Democracy
    German Council on Foreign Relations No. 2 January 2020 – first published in REPORT December 2018 Edited Volume Tunisia’s Fragile Democracy Decentralization, Institution-Building and the Development of Marginalized Regions – Policy Briefs from the Region and Europe Edited by Dina Fakoussa and Laura Lale Kabis-Kechrid 2 No. 2 | January 2020 – first published in December 2018 Tunisia’s Fragile Democracy REPORT The following papers were written by participants of the workshop “Promotion of Think Tank Work on the Development of Marginalized Regions and Institution-Building in Tunisia,” organized by the German Council on Foreign Relations’ Middle East and North Africa Program in the summer and fall of 2018 in cooperation with the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung in Tunis. The workshop is part of the program’s project on the promotion of think tank work in the Middle East and North Africa, which aims to strengthen the scientific and technical capacities of civil society actors in the region and the EU who are engaged in research and policy analysis and advice. It is realized with the support of the German Federal Foreign Office and the Institute for Foreign Cultural Relations (ifa e.V.). The content of the papers does not reflect the opinion of the DGAP. Responsibility for the information and views expressed herein lies entirely with the authors. The editorial closing date was October 28, 2018. Authors: Aniseh Bassiri Tabrizi, Mohamed Lamine Bel Haj Amor, Arwa Ben Ahmed, Elhem Ben Aicha, Ahmed Ben Nejma, Laroussi Bettaieb, Zied Boussen, Giulia Cimini, Rim Dhaouadi, Jihene Ferchichi, Darius Görgen, Oumaima Jegham, Tahar Kechrid, Maha Kouas, Anne Martin, and Ragnar Weilandt Edited by Dina Fakoussa and Laura Lale Kabis-Kechrid No.
    [Show full text]
  • Drinking Water Supply and Sanitation Interventions in Rural Mozambique
    Report | no. 360 Report | no. Impact evaluation of drinking water supply and sanitation interventions in rural Mozambique Since 2006, the UNICEF–Netherlands Partnership evaluation office. It found evidence of a large Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation has increase in the use of improved water sources been supporting Water Supply and Sanitation and in the ownership and use of latrines. Much of programmes in Mozambique. The largest the increase can be attributed to an innovative programme, the ‘One Million Initiative’ aims to approach to sanitation. However, water from bring improved sanitation and clean water to improved sources and even more importantly, over one million people in rural Mozambique. stored water, are not always safe to drink. An Half-way through the programme, a joint impact element of subsidy will continue to be needed to evaluation was carried out by IOB and UNICEF’s sustain facilities and services. More than Water Published by: Ministry of Foreign Affairs Impact evaluation of drinking water supply and sanitation interventions in rural Mozambique Policy and Operations Evaluation Department (IOB) P.O. box 20061 | 2500 eb The Hague | The Netherlands www.minbuza.nl/iob © Ministry of Foreign Affairs | October 2011| ISBN 978-90-5328-414-8 11Buz283729 | E This project was a product of a cooperation between: Impact evaluation of drinking water supply and sanitation interventions in rural Mozambique More than Water Mid-term impact evaluation: UNICEF – Government of The Netherlands Partnership for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene ‘One Million Initiative’, Mozambique Impact evaluation of drinking water supply and sanitation interventions in rural Mozambique Preface Drinking water supply and basic sanitation has been a priority for the Netherlands’ development co-operation and for UNICEF for many years.
    [Show full text]
  • Every Child Survives and Thrives
    GOAL AREA 1 Every child survives and thrives Global Annual Results Report 2019 Cover image: © UNICEF/UN0317965/Frank Dejongh Expression of thanks: © UNICEF/UN0303648/Arcos A mother is washing and cuddling her baby, in the village of On 23 April 2019, in Cucuta in Colombia, a baby undergoes a health Tamroro, in the centre of Niger. check at the UNICEF-supported health centre. In Niger, only 13 percent of the population has access to basic sanitation services. Expression of thanks UNICEF is able to support the realization of children’s rights and change children’s lives by combining high-quality programmes at scale, harnessing innovation and collecting evidence, in partnership with governments, other United Nations organizations, civil society, the private sector, communities and children. It leverages wider change nationally and globally through advocacy, communications and campaigning. UNICEF also builds public support around the world, encouraging people to volunteer, advocate and mobilize resources for the rights and well-being of children, and works with a wide range of partners to achieve even greater impact. UNICEF’s work is funded entirely through the voluntary support of millions of people around the world and our partners in government, civil society and the private sector. Voluntary contributions enable UNICEF to deliver on its mandate to support the protection and fulfilment of children’s rights, to help meet their basic needs, and to expand their opportunities to reach their full potential. We wish to take this opportunity to express deeply felt appreciation to all our many and varied resource partners for support to Goal Area 1 in 2019, and particularly those that were able to provide thematic funding.
    [Show full text]
  • Fast Policy Facts
    Fast Policy Facts By Paul Dufour In collaboration with Rebecca Melville - - - As they appeared in Innovation This Week Published by RE$EARCH MONEY www.researchmoneyinc.com from January 2017 - January 2018 Table of Contents #1: January 11, 2017 The History of S&T Strategy in Canada ........................................................................................................................... 4 #2: January 18, 2017 Female Science Ministers .................................................................................................................................................... 5 #3: February 1, 2017 AG Science Reports ................................................................................................................................................................ 6 #4: February 8, 2017 The deadline approaches… ................................................................................................................................................. 7 #5: February 15, 2017 How about a couple of key moments in the history of Business-Education relations in Canada? .............. 8 #6: February 22, 2017 Our True North ........................................................................................................................................................................ 9 #7: March 8, 2017 Women in Science - The Long Road .............................................................................................................................. 11 #8: March 15, 2017 Reflecting on basic
    [Show full text]
  • School of Economics and Management TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY of LISBON
    School of Economics and Management TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF LISBON Department of Economics AntónioCarlos Afonso, Pestana Mohamed Barros &Ayadi, Nicolas Sourour Peypoch Ramzi Assessment of efficiency in basic and secondary education in A Comparative AnalysisTunisia of a Productregionalivity analysis Change in Italian and Portuguese Airports WP 06/2013/DE/UECE ___________________________________ ______________________ WP 006/2007/DE _________________________________________________________ WORKING PAPERS ISSN Nº 0874-4548 Assessment of efficiency in basic and secondary education in Tunisia: a regional analysis António AFONSO,† Mohamed AYADI,‡Sourour RAMZI * February 2013 Abstract We evaluate the efficiency of basic and secondary education in 24 governorates of Tunisia during the period 1999-2008 using a non-parametric approach, DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis). We use four inputs: number of teacher per 100 students, number of classes per 100 students, number of schools per million inhabitants and education spending per student, while the output measures include the success rate of baccalaureate exam and the rate of non- doubling in the 9th year. Our results show that there is a positive relationship between school resources and student achievement and performance. Moreover, there was an increase in output efficiency scores in most governorates through the period from 1999 to 2008. Keywords: basic and secondary education, efficiency, DEA, Tunisia JEL Codes: C14, H52, I21 † ISEG/UTL - Technical University of Lisbon, Department of Economics; UECE – Research Unit on Complexity and Economics.R. Miguel Lupi 20, 1249-078 Lisbon, Portugal. UECE is supported by FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Portugal), email: [email protected]. ‡ UAQUAP-Institut Supérieur de Gestion de Tunis.e-mail : [email protected], Tél :(216) 98 377 467.
    [Show full text]
  • Tunisia Investment Plan
    Republic of Tunisia FOREST INVESTMENT PROGRAM IN TUNISIA 1. Independent Review of the FIP Tunisia 2. Matrix: Responses to comments and remarks of the independent expert November 2016 Ministère de l’Agriculture, des Direction Ressources Hydrauliques et de Générale des la Pêche Forêts 1 CONTENTS _______________________ I. Independent Review of the Forest Investment Plan of Tunisia 3 II. Matrix: Response to comments and remarks of the independent expert 25 2 I. Independent Review of the Forest Investment Plan of Tunisia Reviewer: Marjory-Anne Bromhead Date of review: (first draft review, 18th August 2016) PART I: Setting the context (from the reviewers overall understanding of the FIP document) Tunisia is the first country in North Africa and the Middle East to benefit from FIP support1, and provides an important example of a country where climate change mitigation and climate resilience go hand in hand. Tunisia is largely “forest poor”, with forests concentrated in the high rainfall areas in the north and North West of the country and covering only 5 percent of the territory (definitions vary). However rangelands are more widespread, covering 27 percent of the land area and are also a source of rural livelihoods and carbon sequestration, while both forests and rangelands are key to broader watershed management (Tunisia is water-scarce). Tunisia, together with the North Africa and Middle East region more broadly, is one of the regions most affected by climate change, with higher temperatures, more periods of extreme heat and more erratic rainfall. REDD actions will help to control erosion and conserve soil moisture and fertility, increasing climate resilience, while also reducing the country’s carbon footprint; the two benefits go hand in hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Development How Can the New Summit Architecture Promote Pro-Poor Growth and Sustainability?
    G20 and Global Development How can the new summit architecture promote pro-poor growth and sustainability? Thomas Fues / Peter Wolff (Editors) G20 and Global Development How can the new summit architecture promote pro-poor growth and sustainability? Thomas Fues / Peter Wolff (eds.) Bonn 2010 German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE) The German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE) is a multidisciplinary research, consultancy and training institute for Germany’s bilateral and for multilateral development co-ope- ration. On the basis of independent research, it acts as consultant to public institutions in Germany and abroad on current issues of co-operation between developed and developing countries. Through its 9-months training course, the German Development Institute prepares German and European University graduates for a career in the field of development policy. Thomas Fues is head of the Training Department at the German Development Institute in Bonn. His main research interests are global governance, rising powers, United Nations and international development cooperation. E-mail: [email protected] Peter Wolff is head of the Department “World economy and development financing” at the German Development Institute in Bonn. His recent work focuses on the consequences of the global financial and economic crisis for the developing world and for global economic governance. E-mail: [email protected] © Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik gGmbH Tulpenfeld
    [Show full text]