DOCSLIB.ORG

Southwestlynx: Integrated High-Performance Public Transportation for Southwestern Ontario by Greg Gormick on Track Strategies June 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Southwestlynx: Integrated High-Performance Public Transportation for Southwestern Ontario by Greg Gormick on Track Strategies June 2018 SouthwestLynx: Integrated High-Performance Public Transportation for Southwestern Ontario By Greg Gormick On Track Strategies June 2018 oxfordcounty.ca SouthwestLynx: Integrated High-Performance Public Transportation for Southwestern Ontario By Greg Gormick On Track Strategies June 2018 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................................4 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................5 1.0 Introduction: A Question of Destiny .....................................................................................................7 2.0 Southwestern Ontario’s Mobility Gap ...................................................................................................8 2.1 VIA Rail Canada ..........................................................................................................................9 2.2 Intercommunity Transportation................................................................................................15 2.3 Urban Transit ............................................................................................................................19 2.4 Intermodal Connectivity ...........................................................................................................20 3.0 The Benefits of Integrated Public Transportation Investment .............................................................22 3.1 Rail Passenger Service ..............................................................................................................23 3.2 Intercommunity Transportation................................................................................................25 4.0 Recent Federal and Provincial Initiatives ............................................................................................27 4.1 GO Transit Expansion ................................................................................................................28 4.2 Ontario Intercity Bus Deregulation ...........................................................................................32 4.3 Ontario Community Transportation Grants ...............................................................................33 4.4 Southwestern Ontario High-Speed Rail Proposal ......................................................................34 4.5 VIA Rail Canada High-Frequency Rail Proposal .........................................................................38 5.0 The High-Performance Rail Advantage ..............................................................................................41 5.1 Phasing and Scalability ............................................................................................................45 5.2 Maximizing the Current Rail Assets ..........................................................................................46 5.3 Traction Power Options .............................................................................................................48 5.4 Maximum Speed vs. Average Speed .........................................................................................50 5.5 Joint Rail Freight Benefits .........................................................................................................52 5.6 Non-Rail Essentials ...................................................................................................................54 6.0 Successful U.S. High-Performance Rail Role Models ...........................................................................55 6.1 Michigan’s Wolverine Corridor ..................................................................................................57 6.2 North Carolina’s Piedmont Corridor ..........................................................................................59 6.3 Northern California’s Capitol Corridor........................................................................................62 7.0 SouthwestLynx Prerequisites .............................................................................................................65 7.1 Southwestern Ontario Rail Fleet Renewal ................................................................................66 7.2 A Federal-Provincial Partnership ..............................................................................................68 7.3 A New Governance and Service Delivery Model ........................................................................69 8.0 SouthwestLynx Strategic Investments ...............................................................................................72 8.1 High-Performance Rail Incremental Investments ......................................................................79 8.1.1 Aldershot-Bayview Junction Capacity Expansion ..........................................................82 8.1.2 Guelph Subdivision Upgrading ......................................................................................84 8.1.3 Bramalea-Georgetown Capacity Expansion ...................................................................86 8.1.4 CN Dundas Subdivision Capacity Expansion ...................................................................88 8.1.5 CN-CP Woodstock-Komoka Line Consolidation ..............................................................89 8.1.6 Continuous Corridor Enhancements ..............................................................................91 9.0 Advancing the SouthwestLynx Plan ...................................................................................................94 9.1 Rail Demonstration Project: North Main Line Pool Agreement and Operation .........................95 9.2 Intercommunity Transportation Service Demonstration Project ...............................................99 10.0 Recommendations ...........................................................................................................................102 10.1 Local and Regional Endorsements .........................................................................................103 10.2 Oxford County SouthwestLynx Vision Workshop ....................................................................103 10.3 Multi-County Intercommunity Transportation Development .................................................104 10.4 Federal and Provincial Government Engagement ..................................................................105 10.5 Hamilton and Niagara Municipal and Regional Outreach ......................................................106 3 Acknowledgments The author gratefully acknowledges the insights and input of numerous professional members of the Canadian and U.S. public transportation industry, who wish to remain anonymous. Thanks to the numerous talented rail photographers who contributed images to this report, especially Andy Cassidy (Vancouver), Ray Farand (Ottawa) and Walter E. Pfefferle (Beachville, Ontario). Special thanks for his encyclopedic knowledge, unique insights and constant encouragement to DAVID GUNN President and Chief Executive Officer (retired) Amtrak West Bay, Nova Scotia Dedication SouthwestLynx is dedicated to the memory of DANIEL HAMMOND (1960-2018) An accomplished telecommunications consultant, public transportation advocate and close friend of the author, Dan provided invaluable assistance in the preliminary stages of this plan. His innovative thinking, his practical and positive outlook, and his unwavering belief in the need for better rail and intercommunity transportation in Southwestern Ontario and across Canada will remain an inspiration to all who continue to work to bring about such a necessary and overdue change in our transportation system. 4 Executive Summary SouthwestLynx is a practical, affordable plan that from around the world, some of which have laid the can be rapidly deployed to address the public groundwork for the later adoption of HSR service transportation access and mobility deficiencies that to augment the original HPR services. All of these are threatening Southwestern Ontario’s economic, successful global precedents have included major social and environmental destiny. intercommunity transportation components, which By creating a high-performance rail (HPR) core have not only acted as feeders to the HPR core routes, system to significantly improve the current but also to provide stand-alone service between the Southwestern Ontario rail passenger services, points they serve. establishing a coordinated network of connecting There are three prerequisites for the implementation intercommunity transportation services and of SouthwestLynx: linking them with intermodal mobility hubs, • Complete replacement of the Southwestern SouthwestLynx can begin improving the region’s Ontario rail passenger fleet with new, proven public transportation system within one year. It is high-performance diesel-electric locomotives scalable and incremental, and it can be completed and rolling stock, and rail infrastructure at a lower and more readily verifiable cost than the improvements; still-unsubstantiated estimate of $21 billion and 14 • Coordination and cooperation among the years required for the proposed Toronto-London- Government of Canada, federally-owned Windsor high-speed rail (HSR) project. It requires VIA Rail, the Government of Ontario and only minor land acquisition, severs no agricultural provincially-owned
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Direct Bus from Guelph to Hamilton
    Direct Bus From Guelph To Hamilton How interrupted is Gilburt when sanctioning and tied Wally focalising some chiliasts? Consumed Monroe always schematize his bacteriostat if Connor is specular or caverns shapelessly. Fletch is unhusbanded and redated tetragonally as eliminable Myles unclipped primarily and betakes mayhap. Most direct routes it and budget, boat and pamper you direct from guelph is available? Like go trains out of a company is an excellent food from downtown campuses via public school div no longer due to fit. Prince edward island. Between two recipe video in to hamilton by toronto! From guelph central go centre, for a direct routes offer various destinations such as with treasury board website is absolutely nothing. Cruise docks in store at all touch points where existing urban settlement areas, before making a national express charter service connecting communities within the vitality of. This access to guelph central ontario and clients are in mind and looking to. All the escarpment in bus from to guelph central station, transit is understood as shorter in! The direct route to recreational vessels may be used on bus will turn immediately loose their home? Hsr and how do any direct bus from guelph to hamilton, go transit in hamilton, you to support for weddings, operated both the southwest plan. Superintendent in peel police are pickpockets in advance to toronto has partnered with a seat on weber street west, growing wholesale distributor that. No longer operating and time. One place on for testing native browser that works for testing native browser that will expose you up at your connection.
    [Show full text]
  • Railway Investigation Report R07d0111 Crossing Collision
    RAILWAY INVESTIGATION REPORT R07D0111 CROSSING COLLISION VIA RAIL CANADA INC. PASSENGER TRAIN NUMBER 35 MILE 23.57, CANADIAN NATIONAL KINGSTON SUBDIVISION PINCOURT/TERRASSE-VAUDREUIL, QUEBEC 17 DECEMBER 2007 The Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB) investigated this occurrence for the purpose of advancing transportation safety. It is not the function of the Board to assign fault or determine civil or criminal liability. Railway Investigation Report Crossing Collision VIA Rail Canada Inc. Passenger Train Number 35 Mile 23.57, Canadian National Kingston Subdivision Pincourt/Terrasse-Vaudreuil, Quebec 17 December 2007 Report Number R07D0111 Synopsis On 17 December 2007, at approximately 1549 eastern standard time, VIA Rail Canada Inc. passenger train No. 35, travelling westward at 62 mph on the south main track of Canadian National’s Kingston Subdivision, struck an empty tractor-trailer that was immobilized on the 3e Avenue level public crossing located at Mile 23.57, near Pincourt/Terrasse-Vaudreuil, Quebec. The tractor-trailer was destroyed; the locomotive was damaged and was unable to continue. Subsequently, 76 passengers were transferred to another VIA Rail Canada Inc. train and rail traffic was delayed for up to 3 ½ hours. The truck driver sustained minor injuries. There was no derailment and no track damage. Ce rapport est également disponible en français. © Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada 2009 Cat. No. TU3-6/07-1E ISBN 978-1-100-12406-3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Factual Information .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pioneering the Application of High Speed Rail Express Trainsets in the United States
    Parsons Brinckerhoff 2010 William Barclay Parsons Fellowship Monograph 26 Pioneering the Application of High Speed Rail Express Trainsets in the United States Fellow: Francis P. Banko Professional Associate Principal Project Manager Lead Investigator: Jackson H. Xue Rail Vehicle Engineer December 2012 136763_Cover.indd 1 3/22/13 7:38 AM 136763_Cover.indd 1 3/22/13 7:38 AM Parsons Brinckerhoff 2010 William Barclay Parsons Fellowship Monograph 26 Pioneering the Application of High Speed Rail Express Trainsets in the United States Fellow: Francis P. Banko Professional Associate Principal Project Manager Lead Investigator: Jackson H. Xue Rail Vehicle Engineer December 2012 First Printing 2013 Copyright © 2013, Parsons Brinckerhoff Group Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means—graphic, electronic, mechanical (including photocopying), recording, taping, or information or retrieval systems—without permission of the pub- lisher. Published by: Parsons Brinckerhoff Group Inc. One Penn Plaza New York, New York 10119 Graphics Database: V212 CONTENTS FOREWORD XV PREFACE XVII PART 1: INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE RESEARCH 3 1.1 Unprecedented Support for High Speed Rail in the U.S. ....................3 1.2 Pioneering the Application of High Speed Rail Express Trainsets in the U.S. .....4 1.3 Research Objectives . 6 1.4 William Barclay Parsons Fellowship Participants ...........................6 1.5 Host Manufacturers and Operators......................................7 1.6 A Snapshot in Time .................................................10 CHAPTER 2 HOST MANUFACTURERS AND OPERATORS, THEIR PRODUCTS AND SERVICES 11 2.1 Overview . 11 2.2 Introduction to Host HSR Manufacturers . 11 2.3 Introduction to Host HSR Operators and Regulatory Agencies .
    [Show full text]
  • Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report
    Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report Genesee & Wyoming Inc.*owns or leases 122 freight railroads worldwide that are organized into 10 operating regions with approximately 7,300 employees and 3,000 customers. * The terms “Genesee & Wyoming,” “G&W,” “the company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer collectively to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliated companies. Financial Highlights Years Ended December 31 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Statement of Operations Data Operating revenues $874,916 $1,568,643 $1,639,012 $2,000,401 $2,001,527 Operating income 190,322 380,188 421,571 384,261 289,612 Net income 52,433 271,296 261,006 225,037 141,096 Net income attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 48,058 269,157 260,755 225,037 141,137 Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. common stockholders: Diluted earnings per common share (EPS) $1.02 $4.79 $4.58 $3.89 $2.42 Weighted average shares - Diluted 51,316 56,679 56,972 57,848 58,256 Balance Sheet Data as of Period End Total assets $5,226,115 $5,319,821 $5,595,753 $6,703,082 $7,634,958 Total debt 1,858,135 1,624,712 1,615,449 2,281,751 2,359,453 Total equity 1,500,462 2,149,070 2,357,980 2,519,461 3,187,121 Operating Revenues Operating Income Net Income Diluted Earnings ($ In Millions) ($ In Millions) ($ In Millions) 421.61,2 Per Common Share 2 2,001.5 401.6 1 $2,000 2,000.4 $400 394.12 $275 271.3 $5.00 1 2 4.79 1 374.3 1 380.21 384.3 261.0 4.581 1,800 250 4.50 350 1,639.0 225.01 225 2 1 1,600 233.5 4.00 2 3.89 1,568.6 4.10 2 300 2 200 213.9 213.3 2 3.78 2 1,400 1 3.50 3.69 289.6 183.32 3.142 250 175 1,200 3.00 211.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Speed Rail Projects in the United States: Identifying the Elements of Success Part 2
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Faculty Publications, Urban and Regional Planning Urban and Regional Planning January 2007 High-Speed Rail Projects in the United States: Identifying the Elements of Success Part 2 Allison deCerreno Shishir Mathur San Jose State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/urban_plan_pub Part of the Infrastructure Commons, Public Economics Commons, Public Policy Commons, Real Estate Commons, Transportation Commons, Urban, Community and Regional Planning Commons, Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Recommended Citation Allison deCerreno and Shishir Mathur. "High-Speed Rail Projects in the United States: Identifying the Elements of Success Part 2" Faculty Publications, Urban and Regional Planning (2007). This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Urban and Regional Planning at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications, Urban and Regional Planning by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MTI Report 06-03 MTI HIGH-SPEED RAIL PROJECTS IN THE UNITED STATES: IDENTIFYING THE ELEMENTS OF SUCCESS-PART 2 IDENTIFYING THE ELEMENTS OF SUCCESS-PART HIGH-SPEED RAIL PROJECTS IN THE UNITED STATES: Funded by U.S. Department of HIGH-SPEED RAIL Transportation and California Department PROJECTS IN THE UNITED of Transportation STATES: IDENTIFYING THE ELEMENTS OF SUCCESS PART 2 Report 06-03 Mineta Transportation November Institute Created by 2006 Congress in 1991 MTI REPORT 06-03 HIGH-SPEED RAIL PROJECTS IN THE UNITED STATES: IDENTIFYING THE ELEMENTS OF SUCCESS PART 2 November 2006 Allison L.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom Liberty
    2013 ACCESS AND PRIVACY Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner Ontario, Canada FREEDOM & LIBERTY 2013 STATISTICS In free and open societies, governments must be accessible and transparent to their citizens. TABLE OF CONTENTS Requests by the Public ...................................... 1 Provincial Compliance ..................................... 3 Municipal Compliance ................................... 12 Appeals .............................................................. 26 Privacy Complaints .......................................... 38 Personal Health Information Protection Act (PHIPA) .................................. 41 As I look back on the past years of the IPC, I feel that Ontarians can be assured that this office has grown into a first-class agency, known around the world for demonstrating innovation and leadership, in the fields of both access and privacy. STATISTICS 4 1 REQUESTS BY THE PUBLIC UNDER FIPPA/MFIPPA There were 55,760 freedom of information (FOI) requests filed across Ontario in 2013, nearly a 6% increase over 2012 where 52,831 were filed TOTAL FOI REQUESTS FILED BY JURISDICTION AND RECORDS TYPE Personal Information General Records Total Municipal 16,995 17,334 34,329 Provincial 7,029 14,402 21,431 Total 24,024 31,736 55,760 TOTAL FOI REQUESTS COMPLETED BY JURISDICTION AND RECORDS TYPE Personal Information General Records Total Municipal 16,726 17,304 34,030 Provincial 6,825 13,996 20,821 Total 23,551 31,300 54,851 TOTAL FOI REQUESTS COMPLETED BY SOURCE AND JURISDICTION Municipal Provincial Total
    [Show full text]
  • CP's North American Rail
    2020_CP_NetworkMap_Large_Front_1.6_Final_LowRes.pdf 1 6/5/2020 8:24:47 AM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Lake CP Railway Mileage Between Cities Rail Industry Index Legend Athabasca AGR Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway ETR Essex Terminal Railway MNRR Minnesota Commercial Railway TCWR Twin Cities & Western Railroad CP Average scale y y y a AMTK Amtrak EXO EXO MRL Montana Rail Link Inc TPLC Toronto Port Lands Company t t y i i er e C on C r v APD Albany Port Railroad FEC Florida East Coast Railway NBR Northern & Bergen Railroad TPW Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway t oon y o ork éal t y t r 0 100 200 300 km r er Y a n t APM Montreal Port Authority FLR Fife Lake Railway NBSR New Brunswick Southern Railway TRR Torch River Rail CP trackage, haulage and commercial rights oit ago r k tland c ding on xico w r r r uébec innipeg Fort Nelson é APNC Appanoose County Community Railroad FMR Forty Mile Railroad NCR Nipissing Central Railway UP Union Pacic e ansas hi alga ancou egina as o dmon hunder B o o Q Det E F K M Minneapolis Mon Mont N Alba Buffalo C C P R Saint John S T T V W APR Alberta Prairie Railway Excursions GEXR Goderich-Exeter Railway NECR New England Central Railroad VAEX Vale Railway CP principal shortline connections Albany 689 2622 1092 792 2636 2702 1574 3518 1517 2965 234 147 3528 412 2150 691 2272 1373 552 3253 1792 BCR The British Columbia Railway Company GFR Grand Forks Railway NJT New Jersey Transit Rail Operations VIA Via Rail A BCRY Barrie-Collingwood Railway GJR Guelph Junction Railway NLR Northern Light Rail VTR
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Government Supports
    Ministry of Economic Development, Job Creation and Trade Revision Update: August 12th, 2020 @ 4:30PM Table of Contents COVID-19 – Provincial Government – Ontario’s Action Plan –Economic and Fiscal Update – Support for Businesses and Individuals 2. August 12th - Ontario Provides Update to Ontario's Action Plan: Responding to COVID- 1. Ontario Releases 2020-21 First Quarter 19 Finances 3. March 25th - Ontario's Action Plan: Responding to COVID-19 (March 2020 Economic and Fiscal Update) COVID-19 – Provincial Government – Support for Businesses 8. July 31st - Ontario Implementing Additional Measures at Bars and Restaurants to Help 2. August 12th - Ontario Providing Municipalities Limit the Spread of COVID-19 with up to $1.6 Billion in First Round of Emergency Funding 9. July 27th - Historic Agreement Delivers up to $4 Billion to Support Municipalities and 3. August 7th - Ontario Continues on the Path of Transit Renewal, Growth, and Economic Recovery 10. July 24th - Ontario Announces Support for 4. August 6th - Canada and Ontario invest in York University's New Markham Centre roads and bridges, connecting rural Campus communities 11. July 23rd - Ontario Supports Indigenous 5. August 6th - Investing in the Future of Businesses During COVID-19 Ontario's Tourism Industry 12. July 22nd - Ontario Legislature Adjourns after 6. August 4th - Province Supporting Innovative Significant Sitting in Response to COVID-19 Made-in-Ontario Technology to Sanitize PPE 13. July 22nd - Canada and Ontario invest in 7. July 31st (Update)- Ontario-Canada bridges and a road for rural communities in Emergency Commercial Rent Assistance Southern Ontario Program - Ontario Provides Urgent Relief for Small Businesses and Landlords – 14.
    [Show full text]
  • (BRES) and Successful Integration of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) May 24, 2016
    Bolton Residential Expansion Study (BRES) and Successful Integration of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) May 24, 2016 The purpose of this memorandum is to review the professional literature pertaining to the potential develop- ment of a Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) in the Bolton Residential Expansion Study area, in response to the Region of Peel’s recent release of the Discussion Paper. The Discussion Paper includes the establishment of evaluation themes and criteria, which are based on provincial and regional polices, stakeholder and public comments. It should be noted that while the Discussion Paper and the Region’s development of criteria does not specifi- cally advocate for TOD, it is the intent of this memorandum to illustrate that TOD-centric planning will not only adequately address such criteria, but will also complement and enhance the Region’s planning principles, key points and/or themes found in stakeholder and public comments. In the following are research findings related to TOD generally, and specifically, theMetrolinx Mobility Hub Guidelines For The Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (September 2011) objectives. Additionally, following a review and assessment of the “Response to Comments Submitted on the Bolton Residential Expansion Study ROPA” submission prepared by SGL Planning & Design Inc. (March 15, 2016), this memorandum evaluates some of the key arguments and assumptions made in this submission relative to the TOD research findings. Planning for Transit-Oriented Developments TOD policy and programs can result in catalytic development that creates walkable, livable neighborhoods around transit providing economic, livability and equitable benefits. The body of research on TODs in the United States has shown that TODs are more likely to succeed when project planning takes place in conjunction with transit system expansion.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume I: Application, Company Evidence & Exhibits
    Newfoundland Power Inc. 55 Kenmount Road PO Box 8910 A FORTIS COMmNY St. John's. Newfoundland A1 B 3P6 Business: (709) 737-5600 Facsimile: (709) 737-2974 www.newfwnd!ar!dpower.mm DELIVERED BY HAND May 10,2007 Board of Commissioners of Public Utilities P.O. Box 21040 120 Torbay Road St. John's, NL AIA 5B2 Attention: G. Cheryl Blundon Director of Corporate Services and Board Secretary Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: 2007 General Rate Application Forwarded with this letter are 10 copies of a general rate application for a full review of Newfoundland Power's 2008 costs (the "2008 General Rate Application"). The 2008 General Rate Application and prefiled supporting materials have been provided in tluee volumes set out as follows: Vol~nne1: Application, Conttpanty Evidence artd Exltibits Vol~in~re3: Expert Evidctrce It is the Company's intention to file an Adobe portable document format (pdf) copy of this filing within the next few days. Additional copies of the filing will be made available as required and, to that end, we would be pleased if the Board could indicate its requirements, if any, at its convenience. The Company will post a copy of tl~e2008 General Rate Application on its website at www.newfoundlandpower.com. In addition copies will be available at the Company's offices in Stephenville, Comer Brook, Grand Falls-Winsor, Gander, Clarenville, Burin, Carbonear, and St. John's. - Board of Commissioners of Public Utilities May 10,2007 Page 2 of 2 Attached to the formal Application as Schedule A are proposed rates. These rates are based upon the rate stabilization and municipal tax adjustments ("RSAMTA adjustments") crrwcrrtly in effect.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge-To-Union GO Rail Feasibility Study Phase 2 FINAL
    Region of Waterloo Cambridge to Union GO Rail Feasibility Study PHASE 2 REPORT Final – February 2021 Dillon Consulting Limited | Hatch Ltd. City of Cambridge to Union Station GO Train Feasibility Study – Final Report | Region of Waterloo Dillon Consulting Limited | Hatch Ltd. Page intentionally left blank City of Cambridge to Union Station GO Train Feasibility Study – Final Report | Region of Waterloo Dillon Consulting Limited | Hatch Ltd. Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................... i Connecting Cambridge to GO Rail Service ........................................................................ i The Regional Context ...........................................................................................................ii Selection of a Station Location ..........................................................................................iii Service Scenarios ................................................................................................................. iv Strategic Case...................................................................................................................... vii Deliverability and Operations .......................................................................................... viii Financial and Economic Considerations .......................................................................... x Comparison with the Milton Extension Alternative .......................................................xv Summary & Next Steps ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Classic Trains Index 2018-2019
    INDEX TO VOLUMES 19 and 20 CLASSIC TRAINS Spring 2018 through Winter 2019 (8 issues) 768 pages HOW TO USE THIS INDEX: Feature material has been indexed three or more times—once by the title under which it was published, again under the author’s last name, and finally under one or more of the subject categories or railroads. Photographs standing alone are indexed (usually by railroad), but photographs within a feature article usually are not separately indexed. Brief items are indexed under the appropriate railroad and/or category. Most references to people are indexed under the company with which they are commonly identified; if there is no common identification, they may be indexed under the person’s last name. Items from countries from other than the U.S. and Canada are indexed under the appropriate country name. ABBREVIATIONS: Sp = Spring issue, Su = Summer issue, Fa = Fall issue, Wi = Winter issue All contents of publications indexed © 2018, and 2019 by Kalmbach Media Co., Waukesha, Wis. A Baldwin Locomotive Works: C Steam’s Last Great Year, Fa19 14 Aberdeen & Rockfish: Baltimore & Ohio: Cajon Standoff, Way It Was, Wi19 80 All-Star Works the Minor Leagues, Archive Treasures, Wi19 46 Amtrak’s Early Years, from the Inside, Fa18 36 California Photo Special (Photo Section), Wi18 44 Abilene & Southern: Cinders: A Forgotten Commodity, Su18 86 California State Railroad Museum, Classics Today, Sp19 103 Steam-powered mixed train at Ballinger, Texas (photo), Su18 50 Dixie Goes the Backway, Sp18 54 California Western: ACF: See American Car & Foundry EM-1 class 2-8-8-4 7609 at night (photo), Fa19 1 Baldwin diesels by enginehouse in 1973 (photo), Su18 56 (color) Action at Jackson (Kentucky), Wi18 50 Engine with Everything (EM-1s), Steam’s Last Great Year, California Zephyr: Adrian & Blissfield: Fa19 22 At Oakland Pier, Sp19 20 (photo) Obscure Ohio & Morenci, Su18 60 George Washington: Seeking Streamliners in 1969, Wi19 54 At Omaha, Overnight to Omaha .
    [Show full text]