DOCSLIB.ORG

Cambridge-To-Union GO Rail Feasibility Study Phase 2 FINAL

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cambridge-To-Union GO Rail Feasibility Study Phase 2 FINAL Region of Waterloo Cambridge to Union GO Rail Feasibility Study PHASE 2 REPORT Final – February 2021 Dillon Consulting Limited | Hatch Ltd. City of Cambridge to Union Station GO Train Feasibility Study – Final Report | Region of Waterloo Dillon Consulting Limited | Hatch Ltd. Page intentionally left blank City of Cambridge to Union Station GO Train Feasibility Study – Final Report | Region of Waterloo Dillon Consulting Limited | Hatch Ltd. Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................... i Connecting Cambridge to GO Rail Service ........................................................................ i The Regional Context ...........................................................................................................ii Selection of a Station Location ..........................................................................................iii Service Scenarios ................................................................................................................. iv Strategic Case...................................................................................................................... vii Deliverability and Operations .......................................................................................... viii Financial and Economic Considerations .......................................................................... x Comparison with the Milton Extension Alternative .......................................................xv Summary & Next Steps .................................................................................................... xvii 1.0 Introduction ........................................................ 1 1.1 Study Background .................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Scope and Purpose ................................................................................................ 3 1.3 Overview of Study Approach ................................................................................ 4 2.0 Connecting Cambridge to Regional Rail: Context and Rationale ..................................................................... 6 2.1 Problem Statement ................................................................................................ 6 2.2 Key Drivers .............................................................................................................. 6 2.3 Constraints and Concurrent Initiatives Overview .............................................. 7 2.4 Key Stakeholder Engagement............................................................................... 7 2.5 Fergus Subdivision Corridor Today...................................................................... 8 2.6 Proposed Station in Cambridge – A Review........................................................ 8 3.0 Fergus Subdivision Service Scenarios ............. 14 3.1 Background and Context .................................................................................... 14 3.2 Methodology and Assumptions ......................................................................... 15 3.2 Service Scenario Development ........................................................................... 19 3.3 Phasing and Delivery ........................................................................................... 22 3.4 Ridership Forecasting .......................................................................................... 23 4.0 Strategic Case .................................................. 31 City of Cambridge to Union Station GO Train Feasibility Study – Final Report | Region of Waterloo Dillon Consulting Limited | Hatch Ltd. 4.1 Overview and Evaluation ..................................................................................... 31 5.0 Economic Feasibility ......................................... 36 5.1 Overview and Approach ...................................................................................... 36 5.2 Impact Assessment .............................................................................................. 36 5.3 Economic Feasibility Summary ........................................................................... 40 6.0 Deliverability and Operational Feasibility ..... 44 6.1 Overview ................................................................................................................ 44 6.2 Background and Context .................................................................................... 44 6.3 Key Opportunities and Risks ............................................................................... 46 6.4 Rolling Stock ......................................................................................................... 47 6.5 Constructability .................................................................................................... 52 6.6 Governance and Operations .............................................................................. 70 6.7 Conclusions ........................................................................................................... 72 7.0 Financial Feasibility .......................................... 73 7.1 Overview ................................................................................................................ 73 7.2 Cost Analysis ......................................................................................................... 73 7.3 Revenue Potential ................................................................................................ 76 7.4 Financial Feasibility Summary ............................................................................ 79 8.0 Comparison with the Milton Corridor ............ 80 9.0 Summary and Next Steps ................................ 84 9.1 Key Findings of Feasibility Review ...................................................................... 84 9.2 Next Steps ............................................................................................................. 90 Appendix A: Station Location Alternatives Evaluation Appendix B: Service Level and Travel Time Assumptions Appendix C: Ridership and Revenue Forecasting Methodology Appendix D: Fergus Subdivision Track Assessment Appendix E: Economic Benefits and Financial Summary Appendix F: Capital Expenditure Summary City of Cambridge to Union Station GO Train Feasibility Study – Final Report | Region of Waterloo Dillon Consulting Limited | Hatch Ltd. Tables Table 2-1 Short-Listed Station Candidate Locations .................................................... 9 Table 2-2 Candidate Station Evaluation Results .........................................................11 Table 3-1 Total All-stop trip times from the Pinebush ION Rapid Transit Station to Guelph and Union Station ............................................................18 Table 3-2 Cambridge-Guelph Rail Service Options ....................................................20 Table 3-3 Service Scenarios for Ridership Forecasting ..............................................24 Table 3-4 Daily Weekday Ridership Forecast (Scenario 2A) ......................................28 Table 4-1 Comparison of Cambridge-Guelph and Cambridge-Milton Connections to GO Service ............................................................................34 Table 4-2 Policy Alignment Summary for the Pinebush ION Rapid Transit Station ..............................................................................................................34 Table 5-1 Transportation User Impacts Summary .....................................................37 Table 5-2 Wider Economic Impacts Summary ............................................................40 Table 6-1 Rolling Stock Travel Times ...........................................................................51 Table 6-2 Grade Crossings along the Fergus Subdivision. ........................................53 Table 6-3 Grade Crossings along the Guelph Line (Not Exhaustive). ......................58 Table 6-4 Transport Canada Track Classes and Associated Maximum Allowable Operating Speeds ..........................................................................58 Table 7-1 Capital Cost Technology Comparison Summary .......................................74 Table 7-2 Total Operating Expenditure for each Service Option .............................76 Table 7-3 Revenue Estimates for all Ridership Scenarios .........................................78 Table 8-1 Comparison of Projected Ridership on Milton and Guelph Corridors (2031) ..............................................................................................83 Table 8-2 2031 Annual Review Comparison with Milton Corridor Options ............83 City of Cambridge to Union Station GO Train Feasibility Study – Final Report | Region of Waterloo Dillon Consulting Limited | Hatch Ltd. Figures Figure 1-1 Key Elements of Phase 1 and 2 of the Study ................................................ 4 Figure 2-1 Map of the Five Candidate GO Transit Station Locations Considered in Cambridge ........................................................................................................ 10 Figure 2-2 Catchment Area for the Pinebush ION Rapid Transit Station .................. 13 Figure 3-1 Illustration of plausible future service on the Kitchener line and a future connection from Guelph to Cambridge on the proposed Cambridge-Guelph line. .....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ontario 2018 Budget: Go Big Or Go Home
    Ontario 2018 Budget: Go Big or Go Home Privileged and confidential sussex-strategy.com Ontario 2018 Budget: Go Big or Go Home Ontario 2018 Budget: Go Big or Go Home March 28, 2018 By Joseph Ragusa, Abid Malik and Brian Zeiler-Kligman Today, Finance Minister Charles Sousa rose in the Legislature to deliver the Ontario government’s budget, for the fiscal year April 1, 2018 to March 31, 2019. This is the last provincial budget to be delivered before voters head to the polls for the June 7th provincial election. It is titled “A Plan for Care and Opportunity” and it is 307 pages long. Background to the Budget In years past, the content of federal and provincial budgets were closely guarded secrets unveiled when the budget was tabled, with only a hint given by the Finance Minister’s shoe photo-op (at least federally). In recent years, we’ve seen a trend toward more pre- announcements, through strategic leaks, of the budget’s highlights, leaving less suspense when the budgets are actually presented. Ontario’s 2018 Budget might have followed this recent trend. But, in this unprecedented political season, which began on January 24th when Patrick Brown’s political world came crashing down, it seems only appropriate that Ontario’s Budget pre-announcements – both in their size and their extent – were also unprecedented. Privileged and confidential sussex-strategy.com Ontario 2018 Budget: Go Big or Go Home In many ways, the announcements in the 2018 Ontario Budget are not that surprising – it’s an election-year budget, which are usually full of proposals to tempt voters.
    [Show full text]
  • Sara Angelucci | Aboretum (Willow Tree with Marsh Wren) | Inkjet Print | 27 X 35.5 Inches | 2015
    SARA ANGELUCCI | ABORETUM (WILLOW TREE WITH MARSH WREN) | INKJET PRINT | 27 X 35.5 INCHES | 2015 SARA ANGELUCCI P A T R I C K M I K H A I L M O N T R É A L 4815 BOULEVARD SAINT-LAURENT MONTRÉAL CANADA H2T 1R6 T. 514.439.2790 SARA ANGELUCCI EDUCATION 1997 Master of Fine Arts, Nova Scotia College of Art and Design 1993 Bachelor of Fine Arts, University of Guelph 1987 Bachelor of Arts (Honours), Art History, University of Guelph SELECTED SOLO EXHIBITIONS 2017 Lianzhou Photography Festival, (Arboretum), Lianzhou, China, curated by Yan Zhou 2017 Piece Work (part of Piece by Piece), Canadian Cultural Centre, Paris 2017 Arboretum, Patrick Mikhail Gallery, Montreal, PQ 2017 Piece Work, Art Gallery of Hamilton, ON 2016 Arboretum, Stephen Bulger Gallery, Toronto, Ontario 2016 Aviary, Halsey Institute of Contemporary Art, South Carolina, USA 2015 TAKING FLIGHT, September 18, Patrick Mikhail Gallery, Montreal, Quebec 2014 Performance of A Mourning Chorus, - September 26, Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Ontario 2014 Public performance of A Mourning Chorus – February 5, Walker Court, AGO, part of Artist-in-Residence, Art Gallery of Ontario, Toronto, Ontario 2013 Provenance Unknown, curator Emelie Chhangur, Art Gallery of York University, Toronto, Ontario 2010 Lacrimosa, Wynick/Tuck Gallery, Toronto, Ontario 2010 Regular 8, Occurrence, Montreal, Quebec 2009 Somewhere in Between, St. Mary’s University Art Gallery, Halifax, Nova Scotia 2009 Regular 8, Wynick/Tuck Gallery, Toronto, Ontario 2008 Room To Remember, Trinity Square Video, Toronto, Ontario 2008
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Bus from Guelph to Hamilton
    Direct Bus From Guelph To Hamilton How interrupted is Gilburt when sanctioning and tied Wally focalising some chiliasts? Consumed Monroe always schematize his bacteriostat if Connor is specular or caverns shapelessly. Fletch is unhusbanded and redated tetragonally as eliminable Myles unclipped primarily and betakes mayhap. Most direct routes it and budget, boat and pamper you direct from guelph is available? Like go trains out of a company is an excellent food from downtown campuses via public school div no longer due to fit. Prince edward island. Between two recipe video in to hamilton by toronto! From guelph central go centre, for a direct routes offer various destinations such as with treasury board website is absolutely nothing. Cruise docks in store at all touch points where existing urban settlement areas, before making a national express charter service connecting communities within the vitality of. This access to guelph central ontario and clients are in mind and looking to. All the escarpment in bus from to guelph central station, transit is understood as shorter in! The direct route to recreational vessels may be used on bus will turn immediately loose their home? Hsr and how do any direct bus from guelph to hamilton, go transit in hamilton, you to support for weddings, operated both the southwest plan. Superintendent in peel police are pickpockets in advance to toronto has partnered with a seat on weber street west, growing wholesale distributor that. No longer operating and time. One place on for testing native browser that works for testing native browser that will expose you up at your connection.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Express Rail Update
    Clause 5 in Report No. 10 of Committee of the Whole was adopted by the Council of The Regional Municipality of York at its meeting held on June 23, 2016 with the following additional recommendation: 3. Receipt of the memorandum from Daniel Kostopoulos, Commissioner of Transportation Services, dated June 22, 2016. 5 Regional Express Rail Update Committee of the Whole recommends adoption of the following recommendations contained in the report dated June 1, 2016 from the Commissioner of Transportation Services: 1. Metrolinx be requested to mitigate the impacts of Regional Express Rail service by addressing the gap between their Initial Business Case for Regional Express Rail and York Region’s needs for grade separations, additional GO stations and parking charges. 2. The Regional Clerk circulate this report to Metrolinx, Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Clerks of the local municipalities. Report dated June 1, 2016 from the Commissioner of Transportation Services now follows: 1. Recommendations It is recommended that: 1. Metrolinx be requested to mitigate the impacts of Regional Express Rail service by addressing the gap between their Initial Business Case for Regional Express Rail and York Region’s needs for grade separations, additional GO stations and parking charges. 2. The Regional Clerk circulate this report to Metrolinx, Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Clerks of the local municipalities. Committee of the Whole 1 June 9, 2016 Regional Express Rail Update 2. Purpose This report provides an update to Council on the Provincial Regional Express Rail (RER) Service Plan and associated staff activities as York Region’s response to the RER Service Plan to be implemented by the Province over the next 10 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Area Transportation System Problems and Opportunities Report
    GTA West Corridor Planning and Environmental Assessment Study Revised Draft Area Transportation System Problems and Opportunities Report GTA West Corridor Planning and Environmental Assessment Study Revised Draft Area Transportation System Problems and Opportunities Report PREFACE The Area Transportation System Problems and Opportunities Report – Draft for Consultation (2009) is one of several interim reports which depicts the study process culminating in the Transportation Development Strategy. The Area Transportation System Problems and Opportunities Report – Draft for Consultation (2009) was first issued in July 2009. The reports purpose was to summarize the process and methodology that was used to identify transportation problems and opportunities, and to document the key findings of this work. In the consultation period following its release, the study team received comments relating to a range of issues, including municipal planning policy, transportation modelling, and planned transportation initiatives within the preliminary study area. The purpose of this revised draft report (December 2010) is to ensure that all comments received have been adequately addressed; where appropriate, the content of the report has been revised accordingly. Appendix C provides a Summary of the Input Received on the draft Problems and Opportunities Report, and details each comment received, the study team’s response, and any changes incorporated into the revised draft report. www.gta-west.com GTA West Corridor Planning and Environmental Assessment Study
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX 5 February 2013
    APPENDIX 5 February 2013 APPENDIX 5 APPENDIX 5-A Paper #5a Transit Service and Infrastructure Paper #5a TRANSIT SERVICE AND INFRASTRUCTURE This paper outlines public transit service within the Town of Oakville, identifies the role of public transit within the objectives of the Livable Oakville Plan and the North Oakville Secondary Plans, outlines the current transit initiatives and identifies future transit strategies and alternatives. This report provides an assessment of target transit modal share, the level of investment required to achieve these targets and the anticipated effectiveness of alternative transit investment strategies. This paper will provide strategic direction and recommendations for Oakville Transit, GO Transit and VIA Rail service, and identify opportunities to better integrate transit with other modes of transportation, such as walking and cycling, as well as providing for accessible services. 1.0 The Role of Transit in Oakville 1.1. Provincial Policy The Province of Ontario has provided direction to municipalities regarding growth and the relationship between growth and sustainable forms of travel including public transit. Transit is seen to play a key role in addressing the growth pressures faced by municipalities in the Greater Golden Horseshoe, including the Town of Oakville. In June 2006, the Province of Ontario released a Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe. The plan is a framework for implementing the Province’s vision for building stronger, prosperous communities by better managing growth in the region to 2031. The plan outlines strategies for managing growth with emphasis on reducing dependence on the automobile and “promotes transit, cycling and walking”. In addition, the plan establishes “urban growth centres” as locations for accommodating a significant share of population and employment growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterloo Region Community Profile 2018
    Region of Waterloo Economic Development Table of Contents CHAPTER 1: Demographics .................................................................................................................................. 6 1.1 General Population ............................................................................................................................. 7 1.1.1 Population Growth ....................................................................................................................... 7 1.1.2 Median Age .................................................................................................................................. 8 1.2 Language ............................................................................................................................................. 8 1.2.1 Languages Spoken at Home ......................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Diversity ............................................................................................................................................ 10 1.3.1 Visible Minorities ....................................................................................................................... 10 1.3.2 Immigrant Population ................................................................................................................ 11 1.4 Income Earners ................................................................................................................................. 12 1.4.1
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail Operations
    Phase 1 Interim Report Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail Operations City of Toronto Prepared for the City of Toronto by IBI Group and Stantec August 30, 2017 IBI GROUP PHASE 1 INTERIM REPORT LAND USE STUDY: DEVELOPMENT IN PROXIMITY TO RAIL OPERATIONS Prepared for City of Toronto Document Control Page CLIENT: City of Toronto City-Wide Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail PROJECT NAME: Operations Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail Operations REPORT TITLE: Phase 1 Interim Report - DRAFT IBI REFERENCE: 105734 VERSION: V2 - Issued August 30, 2017 J:\105734_RailProximit\10.0 Reports\Phase 1 - Data DIGITAL MASTER: Collection\Task 3 - Interim Report for Phase 1\TTR_CityWideLandUse_Phase1InterimReport_2017-08-30.docx ORIGINATOR: Patrick Garel REVIEWER: Margaret Parkhill, Steve Donald AUTHORIZATION: Lee Sims CIRCULATION LIST: HISTORY: Accessibility This document, as of the date of issuance, is provided in a format compatible with the requirements of the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA), 2005. August 30, 2017 IBI GROUP PHASE 1 INTERIM REPORT LAND USE STUDY: DEVELOPMENT IN PROXIMITY TO RAIL OPERATIONS Prepared for City of Toronto Table of Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of Study ..................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Background .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Smarttrack Ridership Analysis: Project Final Report
    SMARTTRACK Research Report RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS Project Final Report Eric J. Miller, James Vaughan, Monika Nasterska June 2016 SMARTTRACK RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS PROJECT FINAL REPORT Prepared for the City Manager, City of Toronto by: Eric J. Miller, Ph.D. Professor, Department of Civil Engineering Director, Transportation Research Institute Research Director, Travel Modelling Group University of Toronto James Vaughan & Monika Nasterska Travel Modelling Group, University of Toronto Transportation Research Institute June, 2016 i Executive Summary Project Objectives On December 11, 2014, City Council directed the City Manager in consultation with the Province/Metrolinx to develop a work plan to undertake an accelerated review of the SmartTrack and RER plans. Council also directed the City Manager to retain the specialized services of the University of Toronto Transportation Research Institute (UTTRI) to support the planning analysis and required transit ridership modelling as a component of the overall review.1 On February 10, 2015, City Council considered the report EX2.2 SmartTrack Work Plan (2015- 2016), and approved the accelerated work plan for the review of SmartTrack.2 The UTTRI component of this work was to provide transit ridership estimates and other key network performance measures using the City’s new Regional Travel Demand Model (GTAModel Version 4.0) developed at the University of Toronto by UTTRI. As detailed in the final Terms of Reference for the UTTRI work, this work included: • Confirming the integrated RER and SmartTrack Service Concept to be modelled. • Completion and validation of a new travel demand model system to be used by the City of Toronto in this and similar studies of transit ridership and travel demand.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 ONTARIO Budget for General Inquiries Regarding 2018 Ontario Budget: Budget Papers, Please Call
    2018 ONTARIO BUDGE 2018 ONTARIO A PLAN FOR CARE AND OPPORTUNITY RX C. Lee RX T THE HONOURABLE CHARLES SOUSA MINISTER OF FINANCE 2018 ONTARIO BUDGET BUDGET PAPERS For general inquiries regarding 2018 Ontario Budget: Budget Papers, please call: Toll-free English and French inquiries: 1-800-337-7222 Teletypewriter (TTY): 1-800-263-7776 For electronic copies of this document, visit our website at www.ontario.ca/budget A printed copy of this publication can be ordered: Online: www.serviceontario.ca/publications By phone: ServiceOntario Contact Centre (Monday to Friday, 8:30 AM to 5:00 PM) Telephone: 416-326-5300 TTY: 416-325-3408 Toll-free across Canada: 1-800-668-9938 TTY Toll-free across Ontario: 1-800-268-7095 © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2018 ISBN 978-1-4868-1883-9 (Print) ISBN 978-1-4868-1884-6 (HTML) ISBN 978-1-4868-1885-3 (PDF) Ce document est disponible en français sous le titre : Budget de l’Ontario 2018 – Documents budgétaires Foreword A Plan for Care and Opportunity Ontario’s economy is performing well. This is largely due to the businesses and entrepreneurs who create jobs and to the women and men who get up each morning to go to the plant, or the office, or another place of work to make Ontario a more prosperous province. At the same time, the government has made strategic investments to support growth. Enhanced education, skills and training, new infrastructure, a competitive business environment and support for startups and small businesses are helping create good jobs. On the surface, the numbers tell a positive story: Our economy has outperformed those of all G7 nations since 2014; Our unemployment rate, at 5.5 per cent, is the lowest it has been in almost 20 years; and Last year alone, 500 net new jobs were created, on average, each day in Ontario, and they were mostly full‐time.
    [Show full text]
  • Membersbiip Listing
    MembersbiiP Listing Mr. John Bllz Mr. Mike Regan Mr. Vic Hergott ONTARIO The Muskoka Board of Education Facility Maintainer/Operator Superintendent of Parks P.O. Box 750 The Public Utilities Commission City of Cambridge PARKSAND RECREATION 14 Pine Street Labatt Park 73 Water Street North P.O Box 2700 p.o. Box 669 Bracebridge, POB J CO London, NbA 4H6 cambridge. N 1R 5W8 Mr. George Bailey Mr. Allan 5eabrooke Mr. John F. de Ronde Mr. Ne.1ICampbell Assistant Plant Supervisor The Corp. of the City of Mississauga City of Kitchener East York Board of Education Parks & Recreation Development & Beautification Co-ord. Parks & Pecreanon Department 840 Coxwell Avenue 3235 Mavis Road Department of Parks & Recreation Box 1118 Toronto, M4C 2V3 Mississauga, L5C I T7 P.O. Box 364 504 Fourth Street East Kitchener. N2G 4G7 Cornwall, K6H 5TI Mr. Mike Stacey Mr .' Steve Blaney Mr. J.A. Morley Foreman General Trades Parks Person One Mr. Richard J. Spraggs Director of Hortfculture Board of Education City of Mississauga City of York Town Engineer The Niagara Parks Commission 7612 Creditview Road, R.R. # 10 40 I Alliance Avenue Corporation of the Town of Leamington P.O. Box 150 Brampton, L6V 3N2 Toronto, M6N 2J 1 83 Wilkinson Drive Niagara Falls, L2E 6T2 Mr. Murray Glassford Leami~gton, M3H 1A4 City of Niagara Falls Mr. Ron Barnes City of Mississauga Mr. Jim Hayward Superintendent of Parks Supervisor. Plant Engineering Parks & Recreation Maintenance - Grounds City of North York 4310 Queen Street 3235 Mavis Road Board of Education for the City of London Parks and Recreation Department Niagara Falls.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Station to Pearson Airport Train Schedule
    Union Station To Pearson Airport Train Schedule Ambrosius lisp her aplanospores organisationally, she sandpapers it unhandsomely. Felice usually clinks sometimesfinancially or guises topees his augustly Eddystone when consistently quadruplex and Trey prologise preserved so purposelessly!irremeably and intransitively. Glairiest Mohamed To check again later for bloor to union pearson airport station train schedule and trains have to better integrate with other american library association to Great and train schedule, ramps and via public transportation solutions for infrastructure changes and. Great service and price better than an Uber for sure. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, the audio mode is drill a card feature that offers enhanced accessibility. To pearson station? Toronto for about the same price as a GO Train ticket. Please wake your email. Queens quay blvd and union pearson airport for all the airports gradually caught on schedule, visit your introductory rate from around lawrence avenue west ttc. Express stations adhere to airports that meet you need. Led lighting and. Open once you may, nor are new station to train schedule. Until recently, Janesville, clean abate and flee to polite service. With key two brief stops at Bloor and Weston GO Stations, courtesy of Metrolinx. Great driver arrived right to union station is easy. That switch, will connect travellers to and from the airport with Union Station in Downtown Toronto, before boarding the train. Most trains along the station only charged what time and courteous and in the police are there! Major credit cards accepted for all purchases. Was ongoing to successfully purchase a ticket for the terrible train.
    [Show full text]