DOCSLIB.ORG

Ductions and Transfers of Marine Organisms (WGITMO)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ductions and Transfers of Marine Organisms (WGITMO) ICES WGITMO REPORT 2014 ICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE ICES CM 2014/ACOM:32 REF. ACOM Report of the ICES Working Group on Intro- ductions and Transfers of Marine Organisms (WGITMO) 19-21 March 2014 Palanga, Lithuania International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer H. C. Andersens Boulevard 44–46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denmark Telephone (+45) 33 38 67 00 Telefax (+45) 33 93 42 15 www.ices.dk [email protected] Recommended format for purposes of citation: ICES. 2014. Report of the ICES Working Group on Introductions and Transfers of Ma- rine Organisms (WGITMO), 19-21 March 2014, Palanga, Lithuania. ICES CM 2014/ACOM:32. 259 pp. For permission to reproduce material from this publication, please apply to the Gen- eral Secretary. The document is a report of an Expert Group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views of the Council. © 2014 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea ICES WGITMO REPORT 2014 | i Contents Executive summary ................................................................................................................ 1 1 Opening of the meeting ................................................................................................ 2 2 Adoption of the agenda ................................................................................................ 3 3 WGITMO Terms of Reference .................................................................................... 4 4 Progress in relation to Terms of Reference ............................................................... 6 4.1 Term of Reference a) ............................................................................................. 6 4.1.1 Belgium ..................................................................................................... 6 4.1.2 Canada ....................................................................................................... 6 4.1.3 Croatia (by correspondence) .................................................................. 6 4.1.4 Denmark .................................................................................................... 7 4.1.5 Estonia ....................................................................................................... 7 4.1.6 Finland ....................................................................................................... 7 4.1.7 France ........................................................................................................ 7 4.1.8 Germany .................................................................................................... 7 4.1.9 Greece ........................................................................................................ 8 4.1.10 Ireland ....................................................................................................... 8 4.1.11 Israel (by correspondence) ...................................................................... 8 4.1.12 Italy ............................................................................................................ 8 4.1.13 Lithuania ................................................................................................... 8 4.1.14 Netherlands .............................................................................................. 9 4.1.15 Norway ...................................................................................................... 9 4.1.16 Poland (by correspondence) ................................................................... 9 4.1.17 Portugal ..................................................................................................... 9 4.1.18 Russia ....................................................................................................... 10 4.1.19 Spain (by correspondence) ................................................................... 10 4.1.20 Sweden .................................................................................................... 11 4.1.21 United Kingdom .................................................................................... 11 4.1.22 United States (by correspondence) ...................................................... 12 4.2 Term of Reference b) .......................................................................................... 12 4.3 Term of Reference c) ........................................................................................... 18 4.4 Term of Reference d) .......................................................................................... 19 4.5 Term of Reference e) ........................................................................................... 23 4.6 Term of Reference f) ........................................................................................... 25 4.7 Term of Reference g) .......................................................................................... 29 4.8 Term of Reference h) .......................................................................................... 29 4.9 Other discussion items and any other business ............................................. 29 4.9.1 WGITMO 40th meeting anniversary .................................................... 29 4.9.2 ICES–CIESM joint Mnemiopsis leidyi workshop ................................. 30 4.9.3 Amending the national report format ................................................. 30 4.9.4 Theme sessions at ICES ASC 2014 ....................................................... 30 ii | ICES WGITMO REPORT 2014 4.9.5 Over one decade of invasion: the non-indigenous cladoceran Evadne anonyx G.O. Sars, 1897 in a low - salinity environment (Presentation by Marilyn Kalaus) ................................ 31 4.9.6 Varia......................................................................................................... 31 5 Closing of the meeting ................................................................................................ 32 Annex 1. List of participants............................................................................................... 33 Annex 2. Meeting agenda ................................................................................................... 38 Annex 3. National reports ................................................................................................... 43 Annex 4. List of new species and range expansions of alien species as reported in National Reports ................................................................................... 169 Annex 5. Draft alien species alert report on Ensis directus ......................................... 223 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 225 2 Identification .............................................................................................................. 226 3 Biology in the native range ...................................................................................... 230 3.1 Natural history .................................................................................................. 231 3.2 Growth rate........................................................................................................ 231 3.3 Reproduction ..................................................................................................... 231 4 Non-native distribution ............................................................................................ 233 4.1 European records .............................................................................................. 233 4.1.1 Natural history in the recipient region ............................................. 235 4.1.2 Habitat and behaviour ........................................................................ 239 4.1.3 Reproduction ........................................................................................ 241 4.1.4 Growth rate ........................................................................................... 242 4.1.5 Impacts .................................................................................................. 242 5 Prospect for further invasions ................................................................................. 246 6 Prospects for control or management where introductions occur .................... 247 Literature Cited ................................................................................................................... 248 Annex 6 Meetings history of WGITMO ........................................................................ 255 Annex 7 Report of the non-native species consultation meeting beween ICES and CIESM ........................................................................................................ 257 Annex 8 Proposed Terms of Reference for 2015 ........................................................... 258 ICES WGITMO REPORT 2014 | 1 Executive summary The 2014 meeting of the ICES Working Group on Introductions and Transfers of Ma- rine Organisms (WGITMO) was held in Palanga, Lithuania during 19-21. March with Sergej Olenin as host and Henn Ojaveer as chair. The meeting was attended by partic- ipants from 22 countries. The physical participants were from Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Greece, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Russia, Sweden, Ukraine and United Kingdom
Load more

Recommended publications
  • §4-71-6.5 LIST of CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November
    §4-71-6.5 LIST OF CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November 28, 2006 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INVERTEBRATES PHYLUM Annelida CLASS Oligochaeta ORDER Plesiopora FAMILY Tubificidae Tubifex (all species in genus) worm, tubifex PHYLUM Arthropoda CLASS Crustacea ORDER Anostraca FAMILY Artemiidae Artemia (all species in genus) shrimp, brine ORDER Cladocera FAMILY Daphnidae Daphnia (all species in genus) flea, water ORDER Decapoda FAMILY Atelecyclidae Erimacrus isenbeckii crab, horsehair FAMILY Cancridae Cancer antennarius crab, California rock Cancer anthonyi crab, yellowstone Cancer borealis crab, Jonah Cancer magister crab, dungeness Cancer productus crab, rock (red) FAMILY Geryonidae Geryon affinis crab, golden FAMILY Lithodidae Paralithodes camtschatica crab, Alaskan king FAMILY Majidae Chionocetes bairdi crab, snow Chionocetes opilio crab, snow 1 CONDITIONAL ANIMAL LIST §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Chionocetes tanneri crab, snow FAMILY Nephropidae Homarus (all species in genus) lobster, true FAMILY Palaemonidae Macrobrachium lar shrimp, freshwater Macrobrachium rosenbergi prawn, giant long-legged FAMILY Palinuridae Jasus (all species in genus) crayfish, saltwater; lobster Panulirus argus lobster, Atlantic spiny Panulirus longipes femoristriga crayfish, saltwater Panulirus pencillatus lobster, spiny FAMILY Portunidae Callinectes sapidus crab, blue Scylla serrata crab, Samoan; serrate, swimming FAMILY Raninidae Ranina ranina crab, spanner; red frog, Hawaiian CLASS Insecta ORDER Coleoptera FAMILY Tenebrionidae Tenebrio molitor mealworm,
    [Show full text]
  • Some Attic Walls Author(S): Merle K
    Some Attic Walls Author(s): Merle K. Langdon Source: Hesperia Supplements, Vol. 19, Studies in Attic Epigraphy, History and Topography. Presented to Eugene Vanderpool (1982), pp. 88-98+215-219 Published by: The American School of Classical Studies at Athens Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1353974 . Accessed: 04/09/2013 21:21 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The American School of Classical Studies at Athens is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Hesperia Supplements. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 63.110.229.170 on Wed, 4 Sep 2013 21:21:44 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions SOMEATTIC WALLS (PLATES7-11) "The Attic landscape ... possesses an aris- tocraticgrace and ease: the frugal, arid land, the gracefulcurves of Hymettos and Penteli- kon, the silver-leaved olive trees, the slen- der ascetic cypresses, the playful glare of rocks in the sun, and above all the buoyant diaphanous,completely spiritual light which dresses and undressesall things." N. Kazantzakis,Report to Greco F ROMTHE THRIASIAN PLAIN on the west to the gulf of Euboiaon the east the landwardborders of Atticawere guardedby impressivefortifications in antiquity.
    [Show full text]
  • Faunistic Assemblages of a Sublittoral Coarse Sand Habitat of the Northwestern Mediterranean
    Scientia Marina 75(1) March 2011, 189-196, Barcelona (Spain) ISSN: 0214-8358 doi: 10.3989/scimar.2011.75n1189 Faunistic assemblages of a sublittoral coarse sand habitat of the northwestern Mediterranean EVA PUBILL 1, PERE ABELLÓ 1, MONTSERRAT RAMÓN 2,1 and MARC BAETA 3 1 Institut de Ciències del Mar (CSIC), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 37-49, 08003 Barcelona, Spain. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Centre Oceanogràfic de les Balears, Moll de Ponent s/n, 07015 Palma de Mallorca, Spain. 3 Tecnoambiente S.L., carrer Indústria, 550-552, 08918 Badalona, Spain. SUMMARY: The sublittoral megabenthic assemblages of a northwestern Mediterranean coarse sandy beach exploited for the bivalve Callista chione were studied. The spatial and bathymetric variability of its distinctive faunal assemblages was characterised by quantitative sampling performed with a clam dredge. The taxa studied were Mollusca Bivalvia and Gastropoda, Crustacea Decapoda, Echinodermata and Pisces, which accounted for over 99% of the total biomass. Three well- differentiated species assemblages were identified: (1) assemblage MSS (Medium Sand Shallow) in medium sand (D50=0.37 mm) and shallow waters (mean depth =6.5 m), (2) assemblage CSS (Coarse Sand Shallow) in coarse sand (D50=0.62 mm) in shallow waters (mean depth =6.7 m), and (3) assemblage CSD (Coarse Sand Deep) in coarse sand (D50=0.64 mm) in deeper waters (mean depth =16.2 m). Assemblage MSS was characterised by the codominance of the bivalves Mactra stultorum and Acanthocardia tuberculata. C. chione was dominant in both density and biomass in assemblages CSS and CSD.
    [Show full text]
  • Stomatopoda of Greece: an Annotated Checklist
    Biodiversity Data Journal 8: e47183 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.8.e47183 Taxonomic Paper Stomatopoda of Greece: an annotated checklist Panayota Koulouri‡, Vasilis Gerovasileiou‡§, Nicolas Bailly , Costas Dounas‡ ‡ Hellenic Center for Marine Recearch (HCMR), Heraklion, Greece § WorldFish Center, Los Baños, Philippines Corresponding author: Panayota Koulouri ([email protected]) Academic editor: Eva Chatzinikolaou Received: 09 Oct 2019 | Accepted: 15 Mar 2020 | Published: 26 Mar 2020 Citation: Koulouri P, Gerovasileiou V, Bailly N, Dounas C (2020) Stomatopoda of Greece: an annotated checklist. Biodiversity Data Journal 8: e47183. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e47183 Abstract Background The checklist of Stomatopoda of Greece was developed in the framework of the LifeWatchGreece Research Infrastructure (ESFRI) project, coordinated by the Institute of Marine Biology, Biotechnology and Aquaculture (IMBBC) of the Hellenic Centre for Marine Research (HCMR). The application of the Greek Taxon Information System (GTIS) of this project has been used in order to develop a complete checklist of species recorded from the Greek Seas. The objectives of the present study were to update and cross-check all the stomatopod species that are known to occur in the Greek Seas. Inaccuracies and omissions were also investigated, according to literature and current taxonomic status. New information The up-to-date checklist of Stomatopoda of Greece comprises nine species, classified to eight genera and three families. Keywords Stomatopoda, Greece, Aegean Sea, Sea of Crete, Ionian Sea, Eastern Mediterranean, checklist © Koulouri P et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
    [Show full text]
  • Ring Test Bulletin – RTB#52
    www.nmbaqcs.org Ring Test Bulletin – RTB#52 Tim Worsfold David Hall Søren Pears (Images) APEM Ltd. March 2017 E-mail: [email protected] RING TEST DETAILS Ring Test #52 Type/Contents – Targeted - Bivalvia Circulated – 12/11/16 Results deadline – 16/12/16 Number of Subscribing Laboratories – 24 Number of Participating Laboratories – 21 Number of Results Received – 21* *multiple data entries per laboratory permitted Summary of differences Total differences for 21 Specimen Genus Species Size returns Genus Species RT5201 Thyasira flexuosa 2-3mm 0 1 RT5202 Abra alba 10mm 0 1 RT5203 Cochlodesma praetenue 3-5mm 5 5 RT5204 Thyasira equalis 2-4mm 3 9 RT5205 Abra nitida 4-6mm 0 1 RT5206 Fabulina fabula 3-5mm 1 1 RT5207 Cerastoderma edule 1mm 6 13 RT5208 Tellimya ferruginosa 3-4mm 0 0 RT5209 Nucula nucleus 8-9mm 0 3 RT5210 Nucula nitidosa 2-3mm 1 3 RT5211 Asbjornsenia pygmaea 2-3mm 1 1 RT5212 Abra prismatica 3-5mm 1 1 RT5213 Chamelea striatula 3-4mm 7 9 RT5214 Montacuta substriata 1-2mm 5 5 RT5215 Spisula subtruncata 1mm 4 6 RT5216 Adontorhina similis 1-2mm 4 4 RT5217 Goodallia triangularis 1-2mm 0 0 RT5218 Scrobicularia plana 1mm 20 20 RT5219 Cerastoderma edule 2-3mm 9 13 RT5220 Arctica islandica 1mm 4 4 RT5221 Kurtiella bidentata 2-3mm 2 2 RT5222 Venerupis corrugata 2-3mm 9 9 RT5223 Barnea parva 10-20mm 0 0 RT5224 Abra alba 4-5mm 1 2 RT5225 Nucula nucleus 2mm 0 11 Total differences 83 124 Average 4.0 5.9 differences /lab. NMBAQC RT#52 bulletin Differences 10 15 20 25 0 5 Arranged in order of increasing number of differences (by specific followed by generic errors).
    [Show full text]
  • Detection of a Population of Pseudosquillopsis Cerisii (Roux, 1828) (Crustacea, Stomatopoda, Parasquillidae) in the Northwestern Mediterranean
    Arxius de Miscel·lània Zoològica , 16 (2018): 213–219 AbellóISSN: and 1698 Maynou–0476 Detection of a population of Pseudosquillopsis cerisii (Roux, 1828) (Crustacea, Stomatopoda, Parasquillidae) in the northwestern Mediterranean P. Abelló, F. Maynou Abelló, P., Maynou, F., 2018. Detection of a population of Pseudosquillopsis cerisii (Roux, 1828) (Crustacea, Stomatopoda, Parasquillidae) in the northwestern Mediterranean. Arxius de Miscel·lània Zoològica , 16: 213–219. Abstract Detection of a population of Pseudosquillopsis cerisii (Roux, 1828) (Crustacea, Stomatopoda, Parasquillidae) in the northwestern Mediterranean. A population of the poorly–known stomatopod crustacean, Pseudosquillopsis cerisii, was detected in the NW Mediterranean Sea. To date, in Mediterranean waters, this species was only known from rare reports that were mainly based on the occurrence of single individuals. Analysis of the stomach contents of ��sh predators caught i n coastal trammel–net artisanal ��sheri es r evealed several i ndividuals of t his species on a sandy bottom with nearby Posidonia seagrass beds in an area within the vicinity of Vilanova i la Geltrú (Catalonia). This is the ��rst r eport of t he species fr o m I beri an Peninsula waters. Key words: Pseudosquillopsis cerisii , Biogeography, Mediterranean, Occurrence, Population, Record Resumen Detección de una población de Pseudosquillopsis cerisii (Roux, 1828) (Crustacea, Sto - matopoda, Parasquillidae) en el Mediterráneo noroccidental. Se ha detectado una población de Pseudosquillopsis cerisii , un crustáceo estomatópodo escasamente conocido en el Mediterráneo noroccidental. En aguas mediterráneas, esta especie era conocida hasta la fecha tan solo por unas cuantas citas principalmente de ejemplares aislados. El análisis del contenido gástrico de peces depredadores capturados utilizando trasmallos en pesca artesanal ha permitido la detección de varios individuos de esta especie en fondos de arena situados en aguas próximas a Vilanova i la Geltrú (Cataluña), en las cercanías de praderas de Posidonia .
    [Show full text]
  • Villa Catering Menu
    V i l l a C a t e r i n g M e n u S t a r t e r s D R U N K E N P O R K 6.5 D i p s Sautéed in tomato Saltsa with peppers, onions and garlic, simmered with red Wine. T A R A M A 4.5 O Y S T E R M U S H R O O M S A U T É E 7.5 Fish Roe dip served with olive oil, thyme and olives. With olive oil, butter, thyme and garlic. M E L I T Z A N O S A L A T A 4.5 H E L L E N I C P I E 6 Eggplant dip drizzled with olive oil, garnished with onion and parsley. Spinach, Zucchini or Feta traditional Pie with homemade Phyllo and fresh local ingredients. T Z A T Z I K I 4 T O M A T O B U T T E R B E A N S 6.5 Cucumber and Yoghurt dip with olive oil and herbs. Cooked in tomato Saltsa with onion, garlic, and celery. S P I C Y C H E E S E D I P 4.5 B A K E D E G G P L A N T S 6.5 Made from yoghurt, feta and chilli, garnished with chilli peppers and herbs. Stuffed with ground beef, topped with Béchamel sauce and Kefalotiri M a i n s | M e a t B a s e & M o r e | G I O U V E T S I 11 12 15 Oven baked Orzo Casserole with Beef, Lamb or Octopus in traditional tomato sauce, evaporated with red Wine and a touch of Kefalotiri.
    [Show full text]
  • Innopolis Itineraries
    TEMPLATE FOR WELLBEING ITINERARIES Introduction Description of the territory chosen (brief recall to WELLFOOD project, i.e.: “this territory was selected since the participation of the concentration of agrifood producers on WELLFOOD project activites.../ The area represent a benchmark of excellence for the production of (select agrifood product), selected as one of the representative and innovative products for our territory in the WELLFOOD HUB. This webtool is an integrated hub which allows the presentation and traceability of the agrofood products of project partners territories. Its function is mainfold: it is a showcase for the traditional products of Adriatic Countries, it has a section dedicated for the producers, it is a virtual place in which agrifood professionals and researchers can exchange information, ideas and updating on agrifood innovation and safety.” Itinerary 1 1st Day Description of the itinerary. Name of the place to visit: Visit Corfu Melissokoliki – Benitses Map Benitses village, a beautiful holiday tourist resort Benitses village is one of the original holiday resorts in Greece, a very old village, proud of its traditions. Perhaps one of the most famous seaside villages in the country due to the strange and strong attraction exerted to almost every visitor to Corfu that is difficult to describe in words. May be is the lush vegetation on the surrounding mountains, the notorious nightlife of the recent past, the beautiful history of the place, or the famous first guests and residents of the 50s..no one can say. Benitses from Koutsomaroula baySyvota at Greek mainland The original part lies in a beautiful location in the middle of a green valley that sweeps down to the sea and has kept its natural beauty intact despite the intense activity and large touristic development since mass tourism started in the 1960s.
    [Show full text]
  • THE DONOUSA MIRACLE a Scientist Bio-Interview with Prof
    THE DONOUSA MIRACLE A Scientist Bio-Interview with Prof. Leonidas A. Papakonstantinidis. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Leonidas_Papakonstantinidis https://researchleap.com/wp- content/uploads/2018/02/04_A_Social_Welfare_Economics_Proposal.edited.pdf Interviewer: Stephen I. Ternyik, Techno-Logos, Inc. (-1985) https://www.sociostudies.org/authors/ternyik_stephen_i/ Sudden mind changes seem to happen by a rapid transformation of the heart beat frequency. Such a deep psychological moment happened to you, when you visited Donousa island in 1979. You came as developmental and academic bureaucrat from the capital (Athens) and you were a bit over 30 years. What did strike you, the young careerist, so much, in that geo-meta-physical location? Yes, I came as a developmental and academic bureaucrat (Agricultural Bank of Greece, Direction of Studies and Planning) from the capital Athens to report on the small Cyclades-Aegean islands, and I started from Donousa. My turning point in the mind was a scene with the mute coachman driving the mule, as opposed to the limousine, which took us from Brussels airport to the building of the European Commission, called the Berlaymont. This was the period (1976-1979) of Greece’s accession to the EEC (now EU). The population of Donousa was fully isolated from what is called ‘quality of life’ or standard of living. I had no idea on how these people faced their day-to- day problems, especially those related to health. No electricity, no water, no infrastructure, no roads, no official port; it was a boat that brought guests to the island. It then literally clicked in me, and I refused my predetermined career, while all other bank direction members (27) became high profile academics or politicians.
    [Show full text]
  • Ostariophysi: Characiformes: Anostomidae)
    Neotropical Ichthyology, 4(1):27-44, 2006 Copyright © 2006 Sociedade Brasileira de Ictiologia Revision of the South American freshwater fish genus Laemolyta Cope, 1872 (Ostariophysi: Characiformes: Anostomidae) Kelly Cristina Mautari and Naércio Aquino Menezes The anostomid genus Laemolyta Cope, 1872, is redefined.Various morphological, especially osteological characters in addi- tion to the commonly utilized features of dentition proved useful for its characterization. A taxonomic revision of all species was made using meristics, morphometrics and color pattern. Five species are recognized: Laemolyta fernandezi Myers, 1950, from the río Orinoco (Venezuela) and the sub-basins Tocantins/Araguaia and Xingu, L. orinocensis (Steindachner, 1879), restricted to the río Orinoco, L. garmani (Borodin, 1931) and L. proxima (Garman, 1890), from the Amazon basin with the latter also occurring in the Essequibo River (Guiana), and L. taeniata (Kner, 1859), from the Amazon and Orinoco basins. Laemolyta garmani macra is considered a synonym of L. garmani, L. petiti a synonym of L. fernandezi, and L. nitens and L. varia synonyms of L. proxima. Lectotypes are designated herein for L. orinocencis and L. taeniata. O gênero Laemolyta Cope, 1872 da família Anostomidae é redefinido e além das características da dentição usualmente utilizadas, outros caracteres morfológicos, principalmente osteológicos, também se revelaram úteis para sua conceituação. Foi feita a revisão taxonômica de todas as espécies utilizando-se dados morfométricos, merísticos e padrão de colorido. Cinco espécies são reconhecidas: Laemolyta fernandezi Myers, 1950 do rio Orinoco (Venezuela) e rios Tocantins/Araguaia e Xingu, Laemolyta orinocensis (Steindachner, 1879) restrita ao rio Orenoco, L. garmani (Borodin, 1931) e Laemolyta proxima (Garman, 1890) da bacia Amazônica, esta última ocorrendo também no rio Essequibo (Guianas) e Laemolyta taeniata (Kner, 1859) da bacia Amazônica e rio Orenoco.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Index 881 SYSTEMATIC INDEX
    systematic index 881 SYSTEMATIC INDEX Acanthodoras 28, 41, 544, 546-548 Anchoviella sp. 20, 152, 153, 158, 159 Acanthodoras cataphractus 28, 41, 544, 546-548 Ancistrinae 412, 438 ACESTRORHYNCHIDAE 24, 130, 168, 334-337 ANCISTRINI 412, 438 Acestrorhynchus 24, 72, 82, 84, 334-337 Ancistrus 438, 442-449 Acestrorhynchus falcatus 24, 334-336 Ancistrus aff. hoplogenys 26, 443-446 Acestrorhynchus guianensis 336 Ancistrus gr. leucostictus 26, 443, 446, 447 Acestrorhynchus microlepis 24, 82, 84, 334, 336, Ancistrus sp. ‘reticulate’ 26, 443, 446, 447 337 Ancistrus temminckii 26, 443, 448, 449 ACHIRIDAE 33, 77, 123, 794-799 Anostomidae 21, 33, 50, 131, 168, 184-201, 202 Achirus 4, 33, 794, 796, 797 Anostomus 131, 184, 185, 188-191 Achirus achirus 4, 33, 794, 796, 797 Anostomus anostomus 21, 185, 188, 189 Achirus declivis 33, 794, 796 Anostomus brevior 21, 185, 188, 189 Achirus lineatus 796 Anostomus ternetzi 21, 117, 185, 188-191 Acipenser 5 Aphyocharacidium melandetum 22, 232, 236, 237 Acnodon 23, 48, 288-292 APHYOCHARACINAE 23, 132, 304, 305 Acnodon oligacanthus 23, 48, 289-292 Aphyocharax erythrurus 23, 132, 304, 305 ACTINOPTERYGII 8 Apionichthys dumerili 33, 794, 796-798 Adontosternarchus 602 Apistogramma 720, 723, 728-731, 756 Aequidens 31, 724, 726-729, 750, 752 Apistogramma ortmanni 31, 723, 728-730 Aequidens geayi 750 Apistogramma steindachneri 31, 41, 69, 79, 723, Aequidens paloemeuensis 31, 724, 726, 727 730, 731 Aequidens potaroensis 726 apteronotidae 29, 124, 602-607 Aequidens tetramerus 31, 724, 728, 729 Apteronotus albifrons 4, 29,
    [Show full text]
  • THE LISTING of PHILIPPINE MARINE MOLLUSKS Guido T
    August 2017 Guido T. Poppe A LISTING OF PHILIPPINE MARINE MOLLUSKS - V1.00 THE LISTING OF PHILIPPINE MARINE MOLLUSKS Guido T. Poppe INTRODUCTION The publication of Philippine Marine Mollusks, Volumes 1 to 4 has been a revelation to the conchological community. Apart from being the delight of collectors, the PMM started a new way of layout and publishing - followed today by many authors. Internet technology has allowed more than 50 experts worldwide to work on the collection that forms the base of the 4 PMM books. This expertise, together with modern means of identification has allowed a quality in determinations which is unique in books covering a geographical area. Our Volume 1 was published only 9 years ago: in 2008. Since that time “a lot” has changed. Finally, after almost two decades, the digital world has been embraced by the scientific community, and a new generation of young scientists appeared, well acquainted with text processors, internet communication and digital photographic skills. Museums all over the planet start putting the holotypes online – a still ongoing process – which saves taxonomists from huge confusion and “guessing” about how animals look like. Initiatives as Biodiversity Heritage Library made accessible huge libraries to many thousands of biologists who, without that, were not able to publish properly. The process of all these technological revolutions is ongoing and improves taxonomy and nomenclature in a way which is unprecedented. All this caused an acceleration in the nomenclatural field: both in quantity and in quality of expertise and fieldwork. The above changes are not without huge problematics. Many studies are carried out on the wide diversity of these problems and even books are written on the subject.
    [Show full text]