DOCSLIB.ORG

Aquatic Nuisance Species Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aquatic Nuisance Species Management Plan NORTH CAROLINA ria ut N e Mystery er Prim es S Wat ros in na e Ch il Aquatic ish F on Nuisance Li rn Sna Species Nor the kehead Marbled Cray fish Hydrill a h Spo fis tted Jelly MANAGEMENT PLAN NORTH CAROLINA AQUATIC NUISANCE SPECIES MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared by the NC Aquatic Nuisance Species Management Plan Committee October 1, 2015 Approved by: Steve Troxler, Commissioner North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Donald R. van der Vaart, Secretary North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Gordon Myers, Executive Director North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements Executive Summary I. Introduction .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................1 The difference between Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS) and Aquatic Nuisance Species (ANS) ................................................................5 Plan Purpose, Scope and Development ............................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Aquatic Invasive Species Vectors and Impacts ............................................................................................................................................................... 6 Interactions with Other Plan ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 II. Problem Description .................................................................................................................................................................................................8 Background .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Ecological Impacts ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Economic Impacts ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 III. Pathways of Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................................................13 Stocking ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Bait Release ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 14 Aquarium Release .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Hitchhiker ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Aquaculture ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 15 Additional Pathways ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 16 IV. Aquatic Nuisance Species of Concern ......................................................................................................................................................16 Freshwater Plants .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Freshwater Animals ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 18 Marine / Estuarine Animals ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 18 High Risk ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 18 V. Jurisdiction and Responsibilities ...................................................................................................................................................................19 State Entities .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 19 North Carolina Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services ................................................................................................................. 19 North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission .................................................................................................................................................... 20 North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries ........................................................................................................................................................... 21 North Carolina Division of Water Resources ........................................................................................................................................................... 22 Other State Entities ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 22 Federal Agencies ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 23 United States Fish and Wildlife Service ..................................................................................................................................................................... 24 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration ............................................................................................................................................. 25 National Park Service ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 25 United States Army Corps of Engineers ..................................................................................................................................................................... 25 United States Coast Guard ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 26 Environmental Protection Agency ............................................................................................................................................................................... 26 United States Forest Service ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 26 Other Entities............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 26 Aquatic Nuisance Species Regulatory Concerns ......................................................................................................................................................... 28 Aquaculture ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 28 Aquatic Weed Authority ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 28 Aquarium and Ornamental Fish Trade & Water Garden Industries .............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Vampire Fish Rides Giant Catfishes in The
    FREE MEALS ON LONG-DISTANCE CRUISERS: THE VAMPIRE FISH RIDES GIANT CATFISHES IN THE AMAZON Jansen Zuanon*, Ivan Sazima** Biota Neotropica v5 (n1) – http://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v5n1/pt/abstract?article+BN03005012005 Recebido em 16/08/04 - Versão revisada recebida em 21/01/05 - Publicado em 10/02/05. *CPBA, Caixa Postal 478, INPA-Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia,69083-970 Manaus, Amazonas, Brasil **Departamento de Zoologia e Museu de História Natural, Caixa Postal 6109, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 13083-970 Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil (www.unicamp.br) **Corresponding author. Tel: + 55-19-3788 7292; fax: +55-19-3289 3124; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract - The trichomycterid catfishes known as candirus are renowned for their blood feeding, but information on their habits under natural conditions is very fragmentary and generally restricted to hosts or habitats. We recorded an undescribed species of the vandelliine genus Paracanthopoma riding the giant jau catfish, Zungaro zungaro (Pimelodidae), in the upper Amazon. The candirus were found on the host’s caudal and pectoral fins, as well as the base of the dorsal fin, with their snouts buried up to the eyes in the tough skin of the catfish host. All of them had small amounts of partly digested blood in the distal part of the gut. Along the host’s dorsal fin base we found a few additional tiny holes, most of them healed. We suggest that Paracanthopoma feeds on the gill chamber of its hosts, and that the individuals we found were taking a ride partly buried into the host’s skin.
    [Show full text]
  • Bacterial Diseases of Crabs: a Review ⇑ W
    Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 106 (2011) 18–26 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Invertebrate Pathology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jip Minireview Bacterial diseases of crabs: A review ⇑ W. Wang Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Biodiversity & Biotechnology and Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Aquatic Crustacean Diseases, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210046, China article info abstract Keywords: Bacterial diseases of crabs are manifested as bacteremias caused by organisms such as Vibrio, Aeromo- Bacteria nas, and a Rhodobacteriales-like organism or tissue and organ tropic organisms such as chitinoclastic Disease bacteria, Rickettsia intracellular organisms, Chlamydia-like organism, and Spiroplasma. This paper pro- Crab vides general information about bacterial diseases of both marine and freshwater crabs. Some bacteria pathogens such as Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio vulnificus occur commonly in blue crab haemolymph and should be paid much attention to because they may represent potential health hazards to human beings because they can cause serious diseases when the crab is consumed as raw sea food. With the development of aquaculture, new diseases associated with novel pathogens such as spiroplasmas and Rhodobacteriales-like organisms have appeared in commercially exploited crab species in recent years. Many potential approaches to control bacterial diseases of crab will be helpful and practicable in aquaculture. Ó 2010 Published by Elsevier Inc. Contents 1. Introduction .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Assessment of Parasite Diversity in Galaxiid Fishes
    diversity Article A Global Assessment of Parasite Diversity in Galaxiid Fishes Rachel A. Paterson 1,*, Gustavo P. Viozzi 2, Carlos A. Rauque 2, Verónica R. Flores 2 and Robert Poulin 3 1 The Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, P.O. Box 5685, Torgarden, 7485 Trondheim, Norway 2 Laboratorio de Parasitología, INIBIOMA, CONICET—Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Quintral 1250, San Carlos de Bariloche 8400, Argentina; [email protected] (G.P.V.); [email protected] (C.A.R.); veronicaroxanafl[email protected] (V.R.F.) 3 Department of Zoology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +47-481-37-867 Abstract: Free-living species often receive greater conservation attention than the parasites they support, with parasite conservation often being hindered by a lack of parasite biodiversity knowl- edge. This study aimed to determine the current state of knowledge regarding parasites of the Southern Hemisphere freshwater fish family Galaxiidae, in order to identify knowledge gaps to focus future research attention. Specifically, we assessed how galaxiid–parasite knowledge differs among geographic regions in relation to research effort (i.e., number of studies or fish individuals examined, extent of tissue examination, taxonomic resolution), in addition to ecological traits known to influ- ence parasite richness. To date, ~50% of galaxiid species have been examined for parasites, though the majority of studies have focused on single parasite taxa rather than assessing the full diversity of macro- and microparasites. The highest number of parasites were observed from Argentinean galaxiids, and studies in all geographic regions were biased towards the highly abundant and most widely distributed galaxiid species, Galaxias maculatus.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Squirt Symbionts! Or What I Did on My Summer Vacation… Leah Blasiak 2011 Microbial Diversity Course
    Sea Squirt Symbionts! Or what I did on my summer vacation… Leah Blasiak 2011 Microbial Diversity Course Abstract Microbial symbionts of tunicates (sea squirts) have been recognized for their capacity to produce novel bioactive compounds. However, little is known about most tunicate-associated microbial communities, even in the embryology model organism Ciona intestinalis. In this project I explored 3 local tunicate species (Ciona intestinalis, Molgula manhattensis, and Didemnum vexillum) to identify potential symbiotic bacteria. Tunicate-specific bacterial communities were observed for all three species and their tissue specific location was determined by CARD-FISH. Introduction Tunicates and other marine invertebrates are prolific sources of novel natural products for drug discovery (reviewed in Blunt, 2010). Many of these compounds are biosynthesized by a microbial symbiont of the animal, rather than produced by the animal itself (Schmidt, 2010). For example, the anti-cancer drug patellamide, originally isolated from the colonial ascidian Lissoclinum patella, is now known to be produced by an obligate cyanobacterial symbiont, Prochloron didemni (Schmidt, 2005). Research on such microbial symbionts has focused on their potential for overcoming the “supply problem.” Chemical synthesis of natural products is often challenging and expensive, and isolation of sufficient quantities of drug for clinical trials from wild sources may be impossible or environmentally costly. Culture of the microbial symbiont or heterologous expression of the biosynthetic genes offers a relatively economical solution. Although the microbial origin of many tunicate compounds is now well established, relatively little is known about the extent of such symbiotic associations in tunicates and their biological function. Tunicates (or sea squirts) present an interesting system in which to study bacterial/eukaryotic symbiosis as they are deep-branching members of the Phylum Chordata (Passamaneck, 2005 and Buchsbaum, 1948).
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating the Threat Posed by the Crayfish Plague Agent
    Estimating the threat posed by the crayfish plague agent Aphanomyces astaci to crayfish species of Europe and North America — Introduction pathways, distribution and genetic diversity by Jörn Panteleit from Aachen, Germany Accepted Dissertation thesis for the partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Doctor of Natural Sciences Fachbereich 7: Natur- und Umweltwissenschaften Universität Koblenz-Landau Thesis examiners: Prof. Dr. Ralf Schulz, University of Koblenz-Landau, Germany Dr. Japo Jussila, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Suomi-Finland Date of oral examination: January 17th, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. LIST OF PUBLICATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 3 2. ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Zusammenfassung ......................................................................................................................... 5 3. ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................................. 6 4. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 7 4.1 Invasive species ............................................................................................................................. 7 4.2 Freshwater crayfish in Europe ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Review and Meta-Analysis of the Environmental Biology and Potential Invasiveness of a Poorly-Studied Cyprinid, the Ide Leuciscus Idus
    REVIEWS IN FISHERIES SCIENCE & AQUACULTURE https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2020.1822280 REVIEW Review and Meta-Analysis of the Environmental Biology and Potential Invasiveness of a Poorly-Studied Cyprinid, the Ide Leuciscus idus Mehis Rohtlaa,b, Lorenzo Vilizzic, Vladimır Kovacd, David Almeidae, Bernice Brewsterf, J. Robert Brittong, Łukasz Głowackic, Michael J. Godardh,i, Ruth Kirkf, Sarah Nienhuisj, Karin H. Olssonh,k, Jan Simonsenl, Michał E. Skora m, Saulius Stakenas_ n, Ali Serhan Tarkanc,o, Nildeniz Topo, Hugo Verreyckenp, Grzegorz ZieRbac, and Gordon H. Coppc,h,q aEstonian Marine Institute, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia; bInstitute of Marine Research, Austevoll Research Station, Storebø, Norway; cDepartment of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Łod z, Poland; dDepartment of Ecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia; eDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, USP-CEU University, Madrid, Spain; fMolecular Parasitology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Pharmacy and Chemistry, Kingston University, Kingston-upon-Thames, Surrey, UK; gDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences, Bournemouth University, Dorset, UK; hCentre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, Suffolk, UK; iAECOM, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada; jOntario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada; kDepartment of Zoology, Tel Aviv University and Inter-University Institute for Marine Sciences in Eilat, Tel Aviv,
    [Show full text]
  • 0041085-15082018101610.Pdf
    Cronfa - Swansea University Open Access Repository _____________________________________________________________ This is an author produced version of a paper published in: The Journal of Antibiotics Cronfa URL for this paper: http://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa41085 _____________________________________________________________ Paper: Zhang, B., Tang, S., Chen, X., Zhang, G., Zhang, W., Chen, T., Liu, G., Li, S., Dos Santos, L., et. al. (2018). Streptomyces qaidamensis sp. nov., isolated from sand in the Qaidam Basin, China. The Journal of Antibiotics http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41429-018-0080-9 _____________________________________________________________ This item is brought to you by Swansea University. Any person downloading material is agreeing to abide by the terms of the repository licence. Copies of full text items may be used or reproduced in any format or medium, without prior permission for personal research or study, educational or non-commercial purposes only. The copyright for any work remains with the original author unless otherwise specified. The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holder. Permission for multiple reproductions should be obtained from the original author. Authors are personally responsible for adhering to copyright and publisher restrictions when uploading content to the repository. http://www.swansea.ac.uk/library/researchsupport/ris-support/ Streptomyces qaidamensis sp. nov., isolated from sand in the Qaidam Basin, China Binglin Zhang1,2,3, Shukun Tang4, Ximing Chen1,3, Gaoseng Zhang1,3, Wei Zhang1,3, Tuo Chen2,3, Guangxiu Liu1,3, Shiweng Li3,5, Luciana Terra Dos Santos6, Helena Carla Castro6, Paul Facey7, Matthew Hitchings7 and Paul Dyson7 1 Key Laboratory of Desert and Desertification, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marbled Crayfish (Decapoda: Cambaridae) Represents an Independent New Species
    Zootaxa 4363 (4): 544–552 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2017 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4363.4.6 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:179512DA-1943-4F8E-931B-4D14D2EF91D2 The marbled crayfish (Decapoda: Cambaridae) represents an independent new species FRANK LYKO 1Division of Epigenetics, DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance, German Cancer Research Center, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany Correspondence: Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum Im Neuenheimer Feld 580 69120 Heidelberg, Germany phone: +49-6221-423800 fax: +49-6221-423802 E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Marbled crayfish are a globally expanding population of parthenogenetically reproducing freshwater decapods. They are closely related to the sexually reproducing slough crayfish, Procambarus fallax, which is native to the southeastern United States. Previous studies have shown that marbled crayfish are morphologically very similar to P. fallax. However, different fitness traits, reproductive incompatibility and substantial genetic differences suggest that the marbled crayfish should be considered an independent species. This article provides its formal description and scientific name, Procambarus virgin- alis sp. nov. Key words: parthenogenesis, annulus ventralis, genetic analysis, mitochondrial DNA Introduction Marbled crayfish were first described in 2001 as the only known obligatory parthenogen among the approximately 15,000 decapod crustaceans (Scholtz et al., 2003). The animals were first described in the German aquarium trade in the late 1990s (Scholtz et al., 2003) and became widely distributed in subsequent years under their German name "Marmorkrebs". Stable populations have developed from anthropogenic releases in various countries including Madagascar, Germany, Czech Republic, Hungary, Croatia and Ukraine (Chucholl et al., 2012; Jones et al., 2009; Kawai et al., 2009; Liptak et al., 2016; Lokkos et al., 2016; Novitsky & Son, 2016; Patoka et al., 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Diurnal Changes in Structure and Function of the Compound Eye of Ligia Exotica (Crustacea, Isopoda)
    J. exp. Biol, 123, 1-26 (1986) \ Printed in Great Britain © The Company of Biologists Limited 1986 DIURNAL CHANGES IN STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION OF THE COMPOUND EYE OF LIGIA EXOTICA (CRUSTACEA, ISOPODA) BY TAKAHIKO HARIYAMA Research Centre for Applied Information Science, Tohoku University, Katahira 2-chome, Sendai 980, Japan V. BENNO MEYER-ROCHDW Department of Biological Sciences, University ofWaikato, Hamilton (Private Bag), New Zealand AND EISUKE EGUCHI Department of Biology, Yokohama City University, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama 236, Japan Accepted 28 February 1986 SUMMARY The ultrastructure of the retinula cells of Ligia exotica changes diurnally and in response to light/dark adaptation. At the low phase of electroretinogram (ERG) amplitude (at noon), the arrangement of microvilli is ordered and the rhabdom is of the open type. An irregular arrangement of microvilli appears at the high phase of ERG amplitude (at midnight), when the rhabdom is of the closed type. The pigment granules disperse at midnight and assemble at noon. A centrally positioned, spike- producing eccentric cell is present in each ommatidium. Spectral response curves based on ERG measurements have two maxima, one to light of 383 nm wavelength, the other at around 520 nm. These two peaks represent the two classes of receptor cells identified by intracellular recordings. The ERG responses to light of 383 nm and 520 nm wavelengths display a diurnal rhythmicity, being high at night and low during the day. However, the responses to green light are more strongly affected than those to ultraviolet light. Consequently, the eye displays a relatively higher ultraviolet-sensitivity during the day, whereas at night sensitivity to green light is increased.
    [Show full text]
  • Balanus Glandula Class: Multicrustacea, Hexanauplia, Thecostraca, Cirripedia
    Phylum: Arthropoda, Crustacea Balanus glandula Class: Multicrustacea, Hexanauplia, Thecostraca, Cirripedia Order: Thoracica, Sessilia, Balanomorpha Acorn barnacle Family: Balanoidea, Balanidae, Balaninae Description (the plate overlapping plate edges) and radii Size: Up to 3 cm in diameter, but usually (the plate edge marked off from the parietes less than 1.5 cm (Ricketts and Calvin 1971; by a definite change in direction of growth Kozloff 1993). lines) (Fig. 3b) (Newman 2007). The plates Color: Shell usually white, often irregular themselves include the carina, the carinola- and color varies with state of erosion. Cirri teral plates and the compound rostrum (Fig. are black and white (see Plate 11, Kozloff 3). 1993). Opercular Valves: Valves consist of General Morphology: Members of the Cirri- two pairs of movable plates inside the wall, pedia, or barnacles, can be recognized by which close the aperture: the tergum and the their feathery thoracic limbs (called cirri) that scutum (Figs. 3a, 4, 5). are used for feeding. There are six pairs of Scuta: The scuta have pits on cirri in B. glandula (Fig. 1). Sessile barna- either side of a short adductor ridge (Fig. 5), cles are surrounded by a shell that is com- fine growth ridges, and a prominent articular posed of a flat basis attached to the sub- ridge. stratum, a wall formed by several articulated Terga: The terga are the upper, plates (six in Balanus species, Fig. 3) and smaller plate pair and each tergum has a movable opercular valves including terga short spur at its base (Fig. 4), deep crests for and scuta (Newman 2007) (Figs.
    [Show full text]
  • Balanus Trigonus
    Nauplius ORIGINAL ARTICLE THE JOURNAL OF THE Settlement of the barnacle Balanus trigonus BRAZILIAN CRUSTACEAN SOCIETY Darwin, 1854, on Panulirus gracilis Streets, 1871, in western Mexico e-ISSN 2358-2936 www.scielo.br/nau 1 orcid.org/0000-0001-9187-6080 www.crustacea.org.br Michel E. Hendrickx Evlin Ramírez-Félix2 orcid.org/0000-0002-5136-5283 1 Unidad académica Mazatlán, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. A.P. 811, Mazatlán, Sinaloa, 82000, Mexico 2 Oficina de INAPESCA Mazatlán, Instituto Nacional de Pesca y Acuacultura. Sábalo- Cerritos s/n., Col. Estero El Yugo, Mazatlán, 82112, Sinaloa, Mexico. ZOOBANK http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:74B93F4F-0E5E-4D69- A7F5-5F423DA3762E ABSTRACT A large number of specimens (2765) of the acorn barnacle Balanus trigonus Darwin, 1854, were observed on the spiny lobster Panulirus gracilis Streets, 1871, in western Mexico, including recently settled cypris (1019 individuals or 37%) and encrusted specimens (1746) of different sizes: <1.99 mm, 88%; 1.99 to 2.82 mm, 8%; >2.82 mm, 4%). Cypris settled predominantly on the carapace (67%), mostly on the gastric area (40%), on the left or right orbital areas (35%), on the head appendages, and on the pereiopods 1–3. Encrusting individuals were mostly small (84%); medium-sized specimens accounted for 11% and large for 5%. On the cephalothorax, most were observed in branchial (661) and orbital areas (240). Only 40–41 individuals were found on gastric and cardiac areas. Some individuals (246), mostly small (95%), were observed on the dorsal portion of somites.
    [Show full text]
  • Meat Yield of Callinectes Bocourti A. Milne Edwards, 1879 (Crustacea, Portunidae) in Iguape, São Paulo, Brazil*
    Invest. Mar., Valparaíso, 34(2): 231-236,Meat 2006 yield of Callinectes bocourti A. Milne Edwards, 1879 231 Nota Científica Meat yield of Callinectes bocourti A. Milne Edwards, 1879 (Crustacea, Portunidae) in Iguape, São Paulo, Brazil* Gustavo Yomar-Hattori1, Bruno Sampaio-Sant’Anna1 & Marcelo A. Amaro-Pinheiro1 1Universidade Estadual Paulista, Campus do Litoral Paulista, Unidade São Vicente Grupo de Pesquisa em Biologia de Crustáceos (CRUSTA) Praça Infante Dom Henrique, s/n São Vicente (SP), CEP 11330-900, Brasil ABSTRACT. The objective of the present study was to analyze the meat yield for both sexes of the crab Callinectes bocourti in the region of Iguape, Brazil. The carapace width for males was 78.1-114.0 mm (96.7 ± 9.5 mm) and for females 76.0-106.3 mm (93.0 ± 7.8 mm). In males, the total wet weight ranged from 65.53 to 224.36 g (134.04 ± 40.77 g) and for females from 56.66 to 164.74 g (105.93 ± 26.88 g). A comparison of morphological structures revealed that the greatest meat yield was in the carapace (55.1%), followed by the right chela (16.9%), the left chela (15.9%), and the legs (12.1%). The total yield from the males (28.5%) was slightly higher than that from the females (22.1%). In general, portunids yield more meat than other crab species. The results of this study will allow the optimization of meat production for this crab species. Manual meat removal makes the process more expensive. This activity could offer an alternative to the fishing communities that live exclusively from this fishery resource.
    [Show full text]