Some Attic Walls Author(S): Merle K
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Some Attic Walls Author(s): Merle K. Langdon Source: Hesperia Supplements, Vol. 19, Studies in Attic Epigraphy, History and Topography. Presented to Eugene Vanderpool (1982), pp. 88-98+215-219 Published by: The American School of Classical Studies at Athens Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1353974 . Accessed: 04/09/2013 21:21 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The American School of Classical Studies at Athens is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Hesperia Supplements. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 63.110.229.170 on Wed, 4 Sep 2013 21:21:44 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions SOMEATTIC WALLS (PLATES7-11) "The Attic landscape ... possesses an aris- tocraticgrace and ease: the frugal, arid land, the gracefulcurves of Hymettos and Penteli- kon, the silver-leaved olive trees, the slen- der ascetic cypresses, the playful glare of rocks in the sun, and above all the buoyant diaphanous,completely spiritual light which dresses and undressesall things." N. Kazantzakis,Report to Greco F ROMTHE THRIASIAN PLAIN on the west to the gulf of Euboiaon the east the landwardborders of Atticawere guardedby impressivefortifications in antiquity. Much is known about them, and the very mention of their names-Eleusis, Oinoe, Phyle, Rhamnous-bringsto mind momentousincidents in the historyof ancientAth- ens, and well-preservedashlar enceintes and towers.Far from these borders,in central and southernAttica, are otherfortifications which do not sharethe limelightwith their morefamous brethren because they are for the most partwithout historical context and are coarse,albeit often substantial,rubble constructions. These rubbleforts have been studiedby J. R. McCrediein a monographwhich is indispensableto topographersand historiansalike.1 For besidespublishing plans and site descriptionsMcCredie provided a historicalreconstruction which plausibly explains about half (13 of 30) the installations in his provisionalcorpus of fortifiedmilitary camps.2 Yet since we are dealingwith simple,rough structures, it is not alwayseasy to distinguishbetween military and non- militarycomplexes. So it is with alternativepossibilities in mindthat I wish to turnboth to McCredie'smonograph, with some possibleadditions and subtractions,3and to a few other little-knownAttic sites, in orderto make an offeringto the great man of Attic I Hesperia,Suppl. XI, FortifiedMilitary Camps in Attica,Princeton 1966 (= FortifiedCamps). 'Reviewers of his monographcriticized some of McCredie'sassigments but without presentinggood alternatives.A recent account of the CremonideanWar, Heinz Heinen, Historia,Einzelschrift 20, Unter- suchungenzur hellenistischenGeschichte des 3. Jahrhundertsv. Chr., Wiesbaden 1972, pp. 95-213, presents objectionswhich are too minor to weaken seriously McCredie'scase. 3Severaladditions have alreadybeen made to McCredie'scorpus of Attic camps:Beletsi, borderingthe plain of Aphidnaon the north, possibly belonging to the system of garrisonforts, Y. Garlan, RA 1967, p. 293; Sagani, between Spata and Loutsa, Addition 2 of M. Petropoulakouand E. Tsimpides-Pentazos,'Ap- xaL4E \EXXY)LKE'HK4E ls, 21, 'ATTLKT, OiKl0TlK- cToLXEla-7p07 'KGEa, Athens 1973; Ovriokastro,east of Keratea,possibly to be associatedwith the CremonideanWar, E. Vanderpoolin Thorikosand the Laurion in Archaicand ClassicalTimes (Afiscellanea Graeca, fasc. 1), Ghent 1975, pp. 26-32; Pirgadaki,on the strait of Salamisnorth of Perama,W. K. Pritchett, Studiesin AncientGreek Topography I, Universityof California Publications:Classical Studies, I, Berkeley and Los Angeles 1965, p. 101. For a map showing these and other sites discussedin this article, see Figure 1. This content downloaded from 63.110.229.170 on Wed, 4 Sep 2013 21:21:44 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions SOME ATTICWALLS 89 Solts' hamnnous *Ono.~sTikwt 'k-oTriko Phyl* irgadaki a ~~~~~~~~~~~~~agani 'Z~~~~~~2 K i~~~~~~~sarii - . FVraona E 5o k.sisnio Anagyroucis~1 St. Dem-ric) ~~~Ovriokds~ Patroklosn Makron~sos I I ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Island~ ap I 0 ~ 5 km. Sounion FIG.1. Map of Attica showing places mentioned in the text This content downloaded from 63.110.229.170 on Wed, 4 Sep 2013 21:21:44 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 90 MERLEK. LANGDON topography,in partialacknowledgment of devotionfelt and debt owed, for helpingthis writer'sinterests find a home in Athena'sland. KAISARIANI On KaisarianiBerg near the monasteryof KaisarianiMcCredie rediscovered a wall which had not been seen since early in the 19th century.4He consideredit partof a fortification,but it is, in my opinion,simply an ancientagricultural field wall. A good parallelmay be found in southernAttica on Mont Michel (P1.7:a). On the southern slope of that hill a wall runs for over 100 meters, from near the summitto the lower edge of tree cover where it disappearsin a vinyard(in aboutthe center of Plate 7:a). The wall is 0.90 m. thickand is preservedwith few exceptionsonly level with the slop- ing surfaceof the hill (P1.7:b). It is composedof single blocks of greenstonewhich formthe full widthof the wall.The stones are roughlydressed on each end to give the wall two faces. As with the wall on KaisarianiBerg there are no meansfor dating,nor are there any tracesof buildingsin the immediatearea. If the slopes of Mont Michel were given over to agriculturein antiquity,as I believe, this wouldexplain the absence of ancientremains. The wallcould have servedto demarcatethe landof two individuals or to protectcertain areas from grazinglivestock. Whatever the case, it seems very unlikelythat this remotewall served a militarypurpose. Likewisethe wall on KaisarianiBerg may be given a more fitting explanation. Investigationshave shownthat the southwesternslopes of MountHymettos were heavi- ly cultivatedin antiquitywith the aid of an extensive system of terraces.5Kaisariani Bergis considerablynorth of this, but it too doubtlesslylay withina cultivatedarea and supportedterraces of arableland, thoughtoday the appearanceof the hill is completely differentafter centuriesof erosion.In antiquity,with a plentifulsupply of waterfrom near-bysprings and enoughsoil to allowit, this hill could have been in the midstof a largeagricultural district. The wall on its northand east sides couldhave been builtfor any of severalreasons required by farmingactivity. McCredienoted the similarityof the wall on KaisarianiBerg to other walls with demonstrablemilitary purpose, the Thriasian"Lager" and the Kamaterowall. This similaritycannot be denied.But if it be acceptedthat agriculturalfield wallswere built in ancientAttica and that KaisarianiBerg was situatedin a farmingdistrict, an explana- tion alongthe lines arguedabove is equallypossible. ST. DEMETRIOSRIDGE In his discussionof the structureon this ridgeMcCredie6 favored explaining it as a lookoutpost or signaltower because it commandsa wide coastalview and is intervisible with the acropolisof Anagyrous.New ceramicfinds suggesta differentfunction. Just west of the structurethe slope of the ridgefalls awaymoderately, and a scatterof pot- "FortifiedCamps, pp. 50-52. 5For the evidence see John Bradford,AntJ 36, 1956, pp. 172-180, and AncientLandscapes. Studies in FieldArchaeology, London 1957, pp. 29-34 and pis. 7, 8. fi FortifiedCamps, p. 117. This content downloaded from 63.110.229.170 on Wed, 4 Sep 2013 21:21:44 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions SOME ATTIC WALLS 91 sherds may be seen for some distance down the slope. The sherds are mostly pieces of good black glaze, and they support McCredie's Classical dating of the structure based on previous ceramic evidence. Two inscribedpieces have turned up in the new wash of sherds. One is a fragment of a Corinthian-typeskyphos7 with a graffito broken away at both sides (Fig. 2:a). The reading &vE'IOEK[E immediately comes to mind. The other piece is a body sherd, glazed inside and out, and probablybelonging to a similar type of vessel (Fig. 2:b). Its inscriptionis in two lines the second of which is broken away at a FIG.2. Graffitifrom St. Demetrios Ridge. Actual size the right but not at the left. The obvious restoration is hLEp[ovIwith the first line namingthe divine recipientof the cup, [ToV3'AVr6~oA l oV, [ToV3 ial ov, vel sim. The difficultywith this is that the first line does not seem to be broken away at left or right, as sufficient amounts of uninscribedsurface are preserved to either side as to suggest that the first line is complete. Yet N01 is a word fragment and cannot stand alone. I prefer to regard the letters as the genitive singular ending of the deity honored and to explain their seemingly isolated position as the result of irregularletter spacing, or word division with the rest of the name in a missing line above the preserved letters. What- ever the explanationthe second line certainlyindicates a religious intent for the cup. Based on the evidence of these votive graffiti I suggest that the structure on the ridge of St. Demetrios was a small sanctuaryrather than a military tower. McCredie is convinced that its walls never rose higher than