Shade Avoidance and Light Foraging of a Clonal Woody Species, Pachysandra Terminalis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

plants Communication Shade Avoidance and Light Foraging of a Clonal Woody Species, Pachysandra terminalis Risa Iwabe, Kohei Koyama * and Riko Komamura Laboratory of Plant Ecology, Department of Agro-Environmental Science, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Inadacho, Obihiro, Hokkaido 080-8555, Japan * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: (1) Background: A central subject in clonal plant ecology is to elucidate the mechanism by which clones forage resources in heterogeneous environments. Compared with studies conducted in laboratories or experimental gardens, studies on light foraging of forest woody clonal plants in their natural habitats are limited. (2) Methods: We investigated wild populations of an evergreen clonal understory shrub, Japanese pachysandra (Pachysandra terminalis Siebold & Zucc.), in two cool-temperate forests in Japan. (3) Results: Similar to the results of herbaceous clonal species, this species formed a dense stand in a relatively well-lit place, and a sparse stand in a shaded place. Higher specific rhizome length (i.e., length per unit mass) in shade resulted in lower ramet population density in shade. The individual leaf area, whole-ramet leaf area, or ramet height did not increase with increased light availability. The number of flower buds per flowering ramet increased as the canopy openness or population density increased. (4) Conclusions: Our results provide the first empirical evidence of shade avoidance and light foraging with morphological plasticity for a clonal woody species. Keywords: clonal plants; clonal species; phalanx; guerrilla; light foraging; phenotypic plasticity; Citation: Iwabe, R.; Koyama, K.; morphology; shade tolerance; shade acclimation; forest understory Komamura, R. Shade Avoidance and Light Foraging of a Clonal Woody Species, Pachysandra terminalis. Plants 2021, 10, 809. https://doi.org/ 1. Introduction 10.3390/plants10040809 Clonal plants produce their offspring via not only sexual reproduction but also asexual Academic Editor: Frank M. Thomas reproduction, in which new individual clones with an identical gene set, called ramets, are generated [1–6]. Elucidating the mechanism by which clones forage resources in Received: 1 April 2021 heterogeneous environments is a central issue in clonal plant ecology [4,5,7–22], plant Accepted: 15 April 2021 growth modeling [23], and their application in vegetation management [17–20,24–31]. Published: 20 April 2021 Additionally, the spatial arrangement of ramets determines the reproductive success of clonal plants; this is because aggregation of ramets that belong to the same genets leads to Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral an increased percentage of geitonogamous self-pollination [6]. with regard to jurisdictional claims in Plants in forests are often shaded by neighboring plants or canopy trees [20,32–39]. published maps and institutional affil- The theory of resource foraging predicts that clonal plants selectively deploy ramets iations. in places where resources are locally abundant [7–12,18,19,21,40,41]. The foraging of favorable resource-rich patches acts as a mechanism of escape from unfavorable patches, including shaded patches [9,12,18]. Avoidance of shade can be achieved at multiple levels [4,19,38]. In shade, clonal plants often increase specific rhizome length (i.e., length Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. per unit mass) [7,18] and elongate their internodes [7,18,38,42] or increase their petiole Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. length [38,42,43]. These increases in rhizome and petiole length are shade-induced spacer This article is an open access article elongation phenomena [42,44]. To date, several researchers have investigated the resource distributed under the terms and foraging theory by experimentally studying clonal plants [7–9,11,19,38,41,44]. conditions of the Creative Commons Most of the previous studies on resource foraging of clonal plants were performed Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// using plants that were grown in pots or trays [7–9,18,19,24,40,42,44–47] and/or inside labo- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ ratories or greenhouses [7,8,19,24,45] rather than in their natural habitats. Nevertheless, it 4.0/). Plants 2021, 10, 809. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10040809 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/plants Plants 2021, 10, 809 2 of 12 Plants 2021, 10, 809 2of12 has been discussed that plants respond to their environment in different ways depending on whether they are grown in pots or in their natural habitats [5,48,49]. Plants in natu- ralhas habitats been discussed experience that plants greater respond fluctuations to their in environment their environment in different compared ways depending with plants thaton whether grow in they pots are or grown in greenhouses in pots or [in32 their,48]. natural Particularly, habitats artificial [5,48,49 shading]. Plants using in natu- shade clothsral habitats or films experience (e.g., [7, greater10,17,18 fluctuations,42,44–47,50 in–54 their]) does environment not produce compared sunflecks with experienced plants bythat plants grow grown in pots in or natural in greenhouses forest understory [32,48]. Particularly, [32,48]. However, artificial compared shading using with shade studies in laboratoriescloths or films or (e.g., gardens, [7,10 studies,17,18,42 on,44 resource–47,50–54 foraging]) does not of wildproduce plants sunflecks in their experienced natural habitats (e.g.,by plants [12,38 grown,41]) are in natural limited. forest Moreover, understory most [32 of,48 the]. However, previous compared studies on with resource studies foraging in oflaboratories clonal plants or gardens, have investigated studies on resource herbaceous foraging [7 of–12 wild,16– plants20,24, in38 their,40–42 natural,44,46 habitats,47] or bam- boo(e.g., [13 [12,15,38], species.41]) are limited. The reproductive Moreover, most biology of the [1, previous29,55–59] studies and resultant on resource genetic foraging structure ofof populations clonal plants [60 have–62] investigated of clonal woody herbaceous species [7 have–12,16 been–20,24 studied,38,40– intensively.42,44,46,47] orHowever, bam- to boo [13,15] species. The reproductive biology [1,29,55–59] and resultant genetic structure the best of our knowledge, no studies have quantitatively investigated light foraging or of populations [60–62] of clonal woody species have been studied intensively. However, to shade avoidance for clonal woody species. Hence, it is unclear whether the theory of light the best of our knowledge, no studies have quantitatively investigated light foraging or foragingshade avoidance can be applied for clonal to woody woody species. clonal Hence,plants init is forest unclear understory whether the vegetation. theory of light foragingJapanese can be pachysandra applied to woody (Pachysandra clonal plants terminalis in forestSiebold understory et Zucc.; vegetation. Buxaceae) is a short- statureJapanese (ramet pachysandra height approximately (Pachysandra 15–35 terminalis cm atSiebold the study et Zucc.; site), Buxaceae)evergreen is woody a short- clonal speciesstature (ramet[63,64] height that propagates approximately using 15–35 horizontal cm at the (plagiotropic) study site), rhizomes evergreen (i.e., woody belowground clonal stems)species [ [6563].,64 Each] that ramet propagates comprises using a horizontal single (usually (plagiotropic) unbranched) rhizomes vertical (i.e., aboveground belowground stem andstems) evergreen [65]. Each leaves ramet with comprises its appearance a single (usually similar unbranched) to an erect vertical herb (Figure aboveground1). This stem species formsand evergreen a dense standleaves in with a relatively its appearance well-lit similar place to (Figure an erect1a) herb and (Figure a sparse1). stand This in species a shaded placeforms (Figure a dense1b). stand It is in a a monoecious relatively well-lit species place with (Figure unisexual1a) and flowers, a sparse and stand the in fruits a shaded are white drupesplace (Figure (Figure1b).1c). It is This a monoecious species is speciesdistributed with unisexualin East Asia flowers, [ 63], and and the it isfruits widely are white used as a grounddrupes (Figure cover plant1c). This in Japan species (pers. is distributed obs.) and in several East Asia other [63 countries], and it is[53 widely,54,66 used–68]. as Reports a byground Jeong cover and plant Kim in [53 Japan] and (pers. Lee obs.)et al. and [54] several clarified other mechanisms countries [53 of,54 shade,66–68 acclimation]. Reports at theby Jeong level ofand an Kim individual [53] and leaf Lee or et al. ramet [54] (e.g., clarified leaf mechanisms photosynthetic of shade traits acclimation and plasticity at in abovegroundthe level of an vertical individual stem leaf length, or ramet etc.), (e.g., which leaf were photosynthetic generally traitsin agreement and plasticity with typicalin aboveground vertical stem length, etc.), which were generally in agreement with typical shade acclimation responses of nonclonal plants. However, the mechanisms of light shade acclimation responses of nonclonal plants. However, the mechanisms of light foraging and shade avoidance by the deployment of new ramets as a clonal plant were foraging and shade avoidance by the deployment of new ramets as a clonal plant were not investigated in these studies. Therefore, in the present study, we investigated a forest not investigated in these studies. Therefore, in the present study, we investigated a forest woodywoody clonal plant plant that that grows grows in in its its natural
Recommended publications
  • Landscaping Without Harmful Invasive Plants

    Landscaping Without Harmful Invasive Plants

    Landscaping without harmful invasive plants A guide to plants you can use in place of invasive non-natives Supported by: This guide, produced by the wild plant conservation Landscaping charity Plantlife and the Royal Horticultural Society, can help you choose plants that are without less likely to cause problems to the environment harmful should they escape from your planting area. Even the most careful land managers cannot invasive ensure that their plants do not escape and plants establish in nearby habitats (as berries and seeds may be carried away by birds or the wind), so we hope you will fi nd this helpful. A few popular landscaping plants can cause problems for you / your clients and the environment. These are known as invasive non-native plants. Although they comprise a small Under the Wildlife and Countryside minority of the 70,000 or so plant varieties available, the Act, it is an offence to plant, or cause to damage they can do is extensive and may be irreversible. grow in the wild, a number of invasive ©Trevor Renals ©Trevor non-native plants. Government also has powers to ban the sale of invasive Some invasive non-native plants might be plants. At the time of producing this straightforward for you (or your clients) to keep in booklet there were no sales bans, but check if you can tend to the planted area often, but it is worth checking on the websites An unsuspecting sheep fl ounders in a in the wider countryside, where such management river. Invasive Floating Pennywort can below to fi nd the latest legislation is not feasible, these plants can establish and cause cause water to appear as solid ground.
  • Additions to the New Flora of Vermont

    Additions to the New Flora of Vermont

    Gilman, A.V. Additions to the New Flora of Vermont. Phytoneuron 2016-19: 1–16. Published 3 March 2016. ISSN 2153 733X ADDITIONS TO THE NEW FLORA OF VERMONT ARTHUR V. GILMAN Gilman & Briggs Environmental 1 Conti Circle, Suite 5, Barre, Vermont 05641 [email protected] ABSTRACT Twenty-two species of vascular plants are reported for the state of Vermont, additional to those reported in the recently published New Flora of Vermont. These are Agrimonia parviflora, Althaea officinalis , Aralia elata , Beckmannia syzigachne , Bidens polylepis , Botrychium spathulatum, Carex panicea , Carex rostrata, Eutrochium fistulosum , Ficaria verna, Hypopitys lanuginosa, Juncus conglomeratus, Juncus diffusissimus, Linum striatum, Lipandra polysperma , Matricaria chamomilla, Nabalus racemosus, Pachysandra terminalis, Parthenocissus tricuspidata , Ranunculus auricomus , Rosa arkansana , and Rudbeckia sullivantii. Also new are three varieties: Crataegus irrasa var. irrasa , Crataegus pruinosa var. parvula , and Viola sagittata var. sagittata . Three species that have been reported elsewhere in 2013–2015, Isoetes viridimontana, Naias canadensis , and Solidago brendiae , are also recapitulated. This report and the recently published New Flora of Vermont (Gilman 2015) together summarize knowledge of the vascular flora of Vermont as of this date. The New Flora of Vermont was recently published by The New York Botanical Garden Press (Gilman 2015). It is the first complete accounting of the vascular flora of Vermont since 1969 (Seymour 1969) and adds more than 200 taxa to the then-known flora of the state. However, the manuscript for the New Flora was finalized in spring 2013 and additional species are now known: those that have been observed more recently, that have been recently encountered (or re-discovered) in herbaria, or that were not included because they were under study at the time of finalization.
  • Common Name Scientific Name Type Plant Family Native

    Common Name Scientific Name Type Plant Family Native

    Common name Scientific name Type Plant family Native region Location: Africa Rainforest Dragon Root Smilacina racemosa Herbaceous Liliaceae Oregon Native Fairy Wings Epimedium sp. Herbaceous Berberidaceae Garden Origin Golden Hakone Grass Hakonechloa macra 'Aureola' Herbaceous Poaceae Japan Heartleaf Bergenia Bergenia cordifolia Herbaceous Saxifragaceae N. Central Asia Inside Out Flower Vancouveria hexandra Herbaceous Berberidaceae Oregon Native Japanese Butterbur Petasites japonicus Herbaceous Asteraceae Japan Japanese Pachysandra Pachysandra terminalis Herbaceous Buxaceae Japan Lenten Rose Helleborus orientalis Herbaceous Ranunculaceae Greece, Asia Minor Sweet Woodruff Galium odoratum Herbaceous Rubiaceae Europe, N. Africa, W. Asia Sword Fern Polystichum munitum Herbaceous Dryopteridaceae Oregon Native David's Viburnum Viburnum davidii Shrub Caprifoliaceae Western China Evergreen Huckleberry Vaccinium ovatum Shrub Ericaceae Oregon Native Fragrant Honeysuckle Lonicera fragrantissima Shrub Caprifoliaceae Eastern China Glossy Abelia Abelia x grandiflora Shrub Caprifoliaceae Garden Origin Heavenly Bamboo Nandina domestica Shrub Berberidaceae Eastern Asia Himalayan Honeysuckle Leycesteria formosa Shrub Caprifoliaceae Himalaya, S.W. China Japanese Aralia Fatsia japonica Shrub Araliaceae Japan, Taiwan Japanese Aucuba Aucuba japonica Shrub Cornaceae Japan Kiwi Vine Actinidia chinensis Shrub Actinidiaceae China Laurustinus Viburnum tinus Shrub Caprifoliaceae Mediterranean Mexican Orange Choisya ternata Shrub Rutaceae Mexico Palmate Bamboo Sasa
  • Open As a Single Document

    Open As a Single Document

    The Magazine of the Arnold Arboretum VOLUME 69 • NUMBER 3 The Magazine of the Arnold Arboretum VOLUME 69 • NUMBER 3 • 2012 CONTENTS Arnoldia (ISSN 0004–2633; USPS 866–100) 2 Picking Up the Pawpaws: The Rare Woody is published quarterly by the Arnold Arboretum Plants of Ontario Program at the University of Harvard University. Periodicals postage paid of Guelph Arboretum at Boston, Massachusetts. Sean Fox Subscriptions are $20.00 per calendar year domestic, $25.00 foreign, payable in advance. 14 Land Bridge Travelers of the Tertiary: Remittances may be made in U.S. dollars, by The Eastern Asian–Eastern North American check drawn on a U.S. bank; by international Floristic Disjunction money order; or by Visa, Mastercard, or American David Yih Express. Send orders, remittances, requests to purchase back issues, change-of-address notices, 24 A Rare Find: Yellow-Fruited Spicebush and all other subscription-related communica- (Lindera benzoin forma xanthocarpum) tions to Circulation Manager, Arnoldia, Arnold Richard Lynch Arboretum, 125 Arborway, Boston, MA 02130- 3500. Telephone 617.524.1718; fax 617.524.1418; 29 Book Review: A Landscape History of e-mail [email protected] New England Arnold Arboretum members receive a subscrip- Phyllis Andersen tion to Arnoldia as a membership benefit. To become a member or receive more information, 36 Plainly Unique: Schisandra chinensis please call Wendy Krauss at 617.384.5766 or Sam Schmerler email [email protected] Postmaster: Send address changes to Front cover: Japanese cornel (Cornus officinalis) blooms Arnoldia Circulation Manager in early spring, typically March at the Arnold Arbore- The Arnold Arboretum tum.
  • Duplication and Diversification in the APETALA1/FRUITFULL Floral

    Duplication and Diversification in the APETALA1/FRUITFULL Floral

    Copyright 2003 by the Genetics Society of America Duplication and Diversification in the APETALA1/FRUITFULL Floral Homeotic Gene Lineage: Implications for the Evolution of Floral Development Amy Litt1 and Vivian F. Irish Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-4108 Manuscript received March 21, 2003 Accepted for publication June 11, 2003 ABSTRACT Phylogenetic analyses of angiosperm MADS-box genes suggest that this gene family has undergone multiple duplication events followed by sequence divergence. To determine when such events have taken place and to understand the relationships of particular MADS-box gene lineages, we have identified APETALA1/FRUITFULL-like MADS-box genes from a variety of angiosperm species. Our phylogenetic analyses show two gene clades within the core eudicots, euAP1 (including Arabidopsis APETALA1 and Antirrhinum SQUAMOSA) and euFUL (including Arabidopsis FRUITFULL). Non-core eudicot species have only sequences similar to euFUL genes (FUL-like). The predicted protein products of euFUL and FUL- like genes share a conserved C-terminal motif. In contrast, predicted products of members of the euAP1 gene clade contain a different C terminus that includes an acidic transcription activation domain and a farnesylation signal. Sequence analyses indicate that the euAP1 amino acid motifs may have arisen via a translational frameshift from the euFUL/FUL-like motif. The euAP1 gene clade includes key regulators of floral development that have been implicated in the specification of perianth identity. However, the presence of euAP1 genes only in core eudicots suggests that there may have been changes in mechanisms of floral development that are correlated with the fixation of floral structure seen in this clade.
  • Green Factor Plant List 2010

    Green Factor Plant List 2010

    Revised December 2010 Seattle Green Factor Plant List Notes: ● All plants on this list are drought-tolerant once they are established unless comments indicate otherwise. ● Seattle Department of Transportations Right-of Way Improvement Manual establishes height limits for non-street-tree plantings in rights-of-way. Maximum plant height within 30 feet of an intersection (as measured from the corner of the curb) is 24 inches. Elsewhere in the right-of-way, plantings are allowed to be 30 inches tall. ● "Bioretention Zone" describes where plants can appropriately be used in bioretention systems such as swales and rain gardens. Zone 1 is the designation for plants that can be used in the flat bottoms of bioretention facilities: 1A refers to species that prefer soil saturation or shallow inundation for long durations, while Zone 1B refers to plants that can alternate between dry ands short-term saturated conditions. Zone 2 is the designation for plants best used at the well-drained slopes of bioretention facilities. All other species are appropriate for planting at the tops of bioretention areas. GROUNDCOVERS Scientific Name Common Name Evergreen Shade Sun Native up to 24" 2-3' ht Bioretention Zone Notes Arctostaphylos uva-ursi kinnikinnick ●●●● Asarum caudatum wild ginger ●● ● Calluna , in variety heather ●●● Ceratostigma plumbaginoides hardy plumbago ●●● ● Daboecia cantabrica Irish heath ●●● Erica , in variety heath ●●● Erigeron karvinskianus Latin American fleabane ●●● ● Euonymous fortunei 'Colorata' wintercreeper euonymous ●●● ● Festuca
  • Phylogeny of the Broadly Sampled Buxaceae

    Phylogeny of the Broadly Sampled Buxaceae

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.03.235267; this version posted August 4, 2020. The copyright holder has placed this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) in the Public Domain. It is no longer restricted by copyright. Anyone can legally share, reuse, remix, or adapt this material for any purpose without crediting the original authors. Not out of the box: phylogeny of the broadly sampled Buxaceae Running title: Phylogeny of Buxaceae Alexey Shipunov1, Hye Ji Lee1, Jinhee Choi1, Kyle Pay1, Sarah DeSpiegelaire1, Aaron Floden2 1Minot State University, Biology, 500 University Ave, Minot, ND 2Missouri Botanical Garden Herbarium, Monsanto Center, 4344 Shaw Blvd, St. Louis, MO 63110 Acknowledgements Our research was supported by North Dakota INBRE and by the Department of Biology of Minot State University. Some of the sequences are results of collaboration with the Barcoding of Life project. We are grateful to the curators of all herbaria provided us with samples, namely US, NY, HUH, MO, CAS, UC, JEPS, K, F, BRIT, B, BO, IBSC, MICH, MO, NY, PE, TI, SPF, SP, USM, PRE, NBG, SAM. AF thanks Dr. Schilling for his encouragement and allowance of taking on extracurricular projects into my many interests while working towards my Ph.D., Dr. Jose Panero for sending the duplicate specimens that instigated part of this project, Joe May and Veronica Brown at the UT Genomics Core, Kelly and Sue at Far Reaches Farm for an additional Sarcococca wallichii, Dr. P.D. González Gutiérrez for discussion of his thesis work of Neotropical Buxus, and Dr. T.
  • Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plant Species Observed at The

    Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plant Species Observed at The

    West Chester University Digital Commons @ West Chester University Gordon Natural Area Baseline Plant Survey Gordon Natural Area Baseline Plant Survey Documents 2016 Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plant Species Observed at the Gordon Natural Area (West Chester University, PA) - Version 10 Nur Ritter West Chester University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcupa.edu/gna_bps_series Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Ritter, N. (2016). Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plant Species Observed at the Gordon Natural Area (West Chester University, PA) - Version 10. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.wcupa.edu/gna_bps_series/4 This Dataset is brought to you for free and open access by the Gordon Natural Area Baseline Plant Survey at Digital Commons @ West Chester University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Gordon Natural Area Baseline Plant Survey Documents by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ West Chester University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plant Species Observed at the Gordon Natural Area (West Chester University, PA) - Version X Key to Sources (see Literature Cited for complete references) E&H 2010: Ebert, J. and J. Holt. 2010; E&M 2012: Ebert J. and K. McMillin. 2012; H 1984: Hertel, G. D. 2008, sampling from 1984; H 2004: Hertel, G. D. 2008, sampling from 2004; H&E 2007: Holt, J. and J. Ebert. 2007; O 1973: Overlease, W. 1973; O&O 2011: Overlease, W. and E. Overlease. 2011; T 2007: Turner, et al. 2007. Species Data Species names follow the nomenclature in USDA PLANTS, with the exception of State-listed taxa (which follow the nomenclature of the Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program).
  • Native Plants Recommended for Landscaping Woodland

    Native Plants Recommended for Landscaping Woodland

    Native Plants Recommended for Landscaping From Cleveland Museum of Natural History’s website (www.cmnh.org) The plant list below includes an array of important native plant species that we recommend for landscaping. These plants provide animals with vital protection, food and nesting sites. The plant list is arranged in alphabetical order by common name. Each species can have several different common names, so when you are shopping for a specific plant we advise you to refer to it by its scientific name. Woodland Wildflowers Common Name Scientific Name False solomon’s seal Smilacina racemosa Spring beauty Claytonia virginica Trillium, large white Trillium grandiflorum Trout lily Erythronium americanum Violet, common blue Viola papilionacea Virginia bluebells Mertensia virginica Wild geranium Geranium maculatum Wild ginger Asarum canadense Wild blue phlox Phlox divaricata Well-Drained Meadow and Roadside Species Common Name Scientific Name Aster, New England Aster novae-angliae Aster, panicled Aster simplex Canada lily Lilium canadense Garden phlox Phlox paniculata Goldenrod, tall Solidago altissima Meadow-rue, tall Thalictrum polyganum Milkweed, common Asclepias syriaca Wild bergamot Monarda fistulosa Evergreen Ground Cover and Ferns Common Name Scientific Name Fern, Christmas Polystichum acrostichoides Fern, intermediate Dryopteris intermedia Fern, marginal shield Dryopteris marginalis Foamflower Tiarella cordifolia Partridgeberry Mitchella repens Wintergreen Gaultheria procumbens Native Plants Recommended for Landscaping (continued)
  • The Allegheny Pachysandra by MICHAEL A

    The Allegheny Pachysandra by MICHAEL A

    The Allegheny Pachysandra by MICHAEL A. DIRR and JOHN H. ALEXANDER III Repetition seems to be the rule with groundcovers for the same taxa are used repeatedly and few attempts have been made to educate the public or offer it alternative selections. Euonymus fortunei ’Colorata’, Hedera helix, Pachysandra terminalis and Vinca minor are the dominant offerings and comprise probably 50 to 60 percent of the total groundcover used in the East and Midwest. None of these groundcovers is without problems and in recent years Pachysandra terminalis, Japanese pachysandra, has been afflicted with Volutella pachysandrae, a fungal pathogen, that causes cankers and stem die- back. A severe infestation can literally devastate an established planting. Controls are available, but often by the time the home- owner recognizes that a problem exists, it is too late for effective treatment. The monoculture of trees (Ex: American elm) should have taught us something; however, the same type of mistake is being repeated with groundcovers. Above: Pachysandra terminalis. Although leaf arrangement is alternate, the nodes are so closely spaced that a rosette-like condition results. Below: Pachysandra terminalis. The specific epithet, terminalis, is derived from the position of the inflorescence. Photos: M. Dirr. 17 An American species, Pachysandra procumbens, Allegheny pachy- sandra, is one of the most handsome plants for groundcover use, yet is seldom seen in gardens or in commerce. This fact has been la- mented by other authorities (4, 6, 7, 8) and the species suffers a fate common to other quality plants: entrapment in the confines of an arboretum or botanic garden. Several reasons for the lack of visibility include limited publicity compared to its Japanese cousin, and the purported difficulty of propagation.
  • Buffer Handbook Plant List

    Buffer Handbook Plant List

    THE BUFFER HANDBOOK PLANT LIST Originally Developed by: Cynthia Kuhns, Lake & Watershed Resource Management Associates With funding provided by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Maine Department of Environmental Protection,1998. Revised 2001 and 2009. Publication #DEPLW0094-B2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Acknowledgements 1 Introductory Information Selection of Plants for This List 1 Plant List Organization & Information 3 Terms & Abbreviations 4 Plant Hardiness Zone Map 5 General Tree & Shrub Planting Guidelines 5 Tips for Planting Perennials 7 Invasive Plants to Avoid 7 Plant Lists TREES 8 (30 to 100 ft.) SHRUBS 14 Small Trees/Large Shrubs 15 (12 to 30 ft.) Medium Shrubs 19 (6 to 12 ft.) Small Shrubs 24 (Less than 6 ft.) GROUNDLAYERS 29 Perennial Herbs & Flowers 30 Ferns 45 Grasses 45 Vines 45 References 49 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Original Publication: This plant list was published with the help of Clean Water Act, Section 319 funds, under a grant awarded to the Androscoggin Valley Soil and Water Conservation District and with help from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Graphics and ‘clip-art’ used in this document came from the University of Wisconsin-Extension and from Microsoft Office 97(Small Business Edition) and ClickArt 97 (Broderbund Software, Inc). This publication was originally developed by Cynthia Kuhns of Lake & Watershed Resource Management Associates. Substantial assistance was received from Phoebe Hardesty of the Androscoggin Valley Soil and Water Conservation District. Valuable review and advice was given by Karen Hahnel and Kathy Hoppe of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection. Elizabeth T. Muir provided free and cheerful editing and botanical advice.
  • The Alkaloid-Enriched Fraction of Pachysandra Terminalis (Buxaceae) Shows Prominent Activity Against Trypanosoma Brucei Rhodesiense

    The Alkaloid-Enriched Fraction of Pachysandra Terminalis (Buxaceae) Shows Prominent Activity Against Trypanosoma Brucei Rhodesiense

    molecules Article The Alkaloid-Enriched Fraction of Pachysandra terminalis (Buxaceae) Shows Prominent Activity against Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense Dagmar Flittner 1, Marcel Kaiser 2,3, Pascal Mäser 2,3 , Norberto P. Lopes 4 and Thomas J. Schmidt 1,* 1 Institute of Pharmaceutical Biology and Phytochemistry (IPBP), University of Münster, PharmaCampus, Corrensstr. 48, D-48149 Münster, Germany; dagmar.fl[email protected] 2 Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH), Socinstrasse 57, CH-4051 Basel, Switzerland; [email protected] (M.K.); [email protected] (P.M.) 3 University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, CH-4003 Basel, Switzerland 4 Núcleo de Pesquisa em Produtos Naturais e Sintéticos (NPPNS), Department of Biomolecular Sciences from School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Av. Do Café s/n CEP, 14040-903 Ribeirão Preto-SP, Brazil; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-251-83-33378 Abstract: In the course of our studies on antiprotozoal natural products and following our recent discovery that certain aminosteroids and aminocycloartanoid compounds from Holarrhena africana A. DC. (Apocynaceae) and Buxus sempervirens L. (Buxaceae), respectively, are strong and selective antit- rypanosomal agents, we have extended these studies to another plant, related to the latter—namely, Pachysandra terminalis Sieb. and Zucc. (Buxaceae). This species is known to contain aminosteroids similar to those of Holarrhena and structurally related to the aminocycloartanoids of Buxus. The dicholoromethane extract obtained from aerial parts of P. terminalis and, in particular, its alkaloid fraction obtained by acid–base partitioning showed prominent activity against Trypanosoma brucei Citation: Flittner, D.; Kaiser, M.; Mäser, P.; Lopes, N.P.; Schmidt, T.J.