Native Plants Recommended for Landscaping Woodland
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE
Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE LILIACEAE de Jussieu 1789 (Lily Family) (also see AGAVACEAE, ALLIACEAE, ALSTROEMERIACEAE, AMARYLLIDACEAE, ASPARAGACEAE, COLCHICACEAE, HEMEROCALLIDACEAE, HOSTACEAE, HYACINTHACEAE, HYPOXIDACEAE, MELANTHIACEAE, NARTHECIACEAE, RUSCACEAE, SMILACACEAE, THEMIDACEAE, TOFIELDIACEAE) As here interpreted narrowly, the Liliaceae constitutes about 11 genera and 550 species, of the Northern Hemisphere. There has been much recent investigation and re-interpretation of evidence regarding the upper-level taxonomy of the Liliales, with strong suggestions that the broad Liliaceae recognized by Cronquist (1981) is artificial and polyphyletic. Cronquist (1993) himself concurs, at least to a degree: "we still await a comprehensive reorganization of the lilies into several families more comparable to other recognized families of angiosperms." Dahlgren & Clifford (1982) and Dahlgren, Clifford, & Yeo (1985) synthesized an early phase in the modern revolution of monocot taxonomy. Since then, additional research, especially molecular (Duvall et al. 1993, Chase et al. 1993, Bogler & Simpson 1995, and many others), has strongly validated the general lines (and many details) of Dahlgren's arrangement. The most recent synthesis (Kubitzki 1998a) is followed as the basis for familial and generic taxonomy of the lilies and their relatives (see summary below). References: Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (1998, 2003); Tamura in Kubitzki (1998a). Our “liliaceous” genera (members of orders placed in the Lilianae) are therefore divided as shown below, largely following Kubitzki (1998a) and some more recent molecular analyses. ALISMATALES TOFIELDIACEAE: Pleea, Tofieldia. LILIALES ALSTROEMERIACEAE: Alstroemeria COLCHICACEAE: Colchicum, Uvularia. LILIACEAE: Clintonia, Erythronium, Lilium, Medeola, Prosartes, Streptopus, Tricyrtis, Tulipa. MELANTHIACEAE: Amianthium, Anticlea, Chamaelirium, Helonias, Melanthium, Schoenocaulon, Stenanthium, Veratrum, Toxicoscordion, Trillium, Xerophyllum, Zigadenus. -
Reduction of Diplycosia Indica (2009) to Gaultheria Akaensis (2006)
Panda, S., J.L. Reveal, and M. Sanjappa. 2012. Reduction of Diplycosia indica (2009) to Gaultheria akaensis (2006). Phytoneuron 2012-35: 1–7. Published 23 April 2012. ISSN 2153 733X REDUCTION OF DIPLYCOSIA INDICA (2009) TO GAULTHERIA AKAENSIS (2006) (ERICACEAE) SUBHASIS PANDA Taxonomy & Biosystematics Laboratory, Post-Graduate Department of Botany Darjeeling Government College, Darjeeling-734101 INDIA [email protected] JAMES L. REVEAL L.H. Bailey Hortorium, Department of Plant Biology Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853-4301 USA [email protected] MUNIVENKATAPPA SANJAPPA Former Director, Botanical Survey of India Presently at Botanical Garden, University of Agricultural Sciences GKVK, Bengaluru-560064 INDIA ABSTRACT Diplycosia indica M.R. Debta & H.J. Chowdhery is reduced to synonymy under Gaultheria akaensis Panda & Sanjappa due to a misinterpretation of immature floral features of the type material used by Debta and Chowdhery to establish their new species. KEY WORDS : nomenclature, synonymy, India, Singalelah National Park Diplycosia indica was described by Debta and Chowdhery (2009) based on two specimens collected by M.R. Debta in the Singalelah National Park area of the Darjeeling Himalaya. During the course of recent field studies (mid-December 2011) at different locations in Singalelah National Park as part of post-revisionary work in Indian Ericaceae, specimens of a species of Gaultheria L. were collected near Megma, Megma-Tonglu road and in the Kainyakata-Kalapokhri area on rocky slopes near adjacent road sides. The Gaultheria was identified as G. akaensis Panda & Sanjappa (2006), a critically endangered species then known only from Aka Hill in the Arunachal Himalaya. This expression of G. akaensis from the Singalelah National Park then proved to be identical to the type of D. -
The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts
The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory, -
Taxon Order Family Scientific Name Common Name Non-Native No. of Individuals/Abundance Notes Bees Hymenoptera Andrenidae Calliop
Taxon Order Family Scientific Name Common Name Non-native No. of individuals/abundance Notes Bees Hymenoptera Andrenidae Calliopsis andreniformis Mining bee 5 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Apis millifera European honey bee X 20 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Bombus griseocollis Brown belted bumble bee 1 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Bombus impatiens Common eastern bumble bee 12 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Ceratina calcarata Small carpenter bee 9 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Ceratina mikmaqi Small carpenter bee 4 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Ceratina strenua Small carpenter bee 10 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Melissodes druriella Small carpenter bee 6 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Xylocopa virginica Eastern carpenter bee 1 Bees Hymenoptera Colletidae Hylaeus affinis masked face bee 6 Bees Hymenoptera Colletidae Hylaeus mesillae masked face bee 3 Bees Hymenoptera Colletidae Hylaeus modestus masked face bee 2 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Agapostemon virescens Sweat bee 7 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Augochlora pura Sweat bee 1 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Augochloropsis metallica metallica Sweat bee 2 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Halictus confusus Sweat bee 7 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Halictus ligatus Sweat bee 2 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Lasioglossum anomalum Sweat bee 1 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Lasioglossum ellissiae Sweat bee 1 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Lasioglossum laevissimum Sweat bee 1 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Lasioglossum platyparium Cuckoo sweat bee 1 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Lasioglossum versatum Sweat bee 6 Beetles Coleoptera Carabidae Agonum sp. A ground beetle -
Coptis Trifolia Conservation Assessment
CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT for Coptis trifolia (L.) Salisb. Originally issued as Management Recommendations December 1998 Marty Stein Reconfigured-January 2005 Tracy L. Fuentes USDA Forest Service Region 6 and USDI Bureau of Land Management, Oregon and Washington CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT FOR COPTIS TRIFOLIA Table of Contents Page List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. 2 List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ 2 Summary........................................................................................................................................ 4 I. NATURAL HISTORY............................................................................................................. 6 A. Taxonomy and Nomenclature.......................................................................................... 6 B. Species Description ........................................................................................................... 6 1. Morphology ................................................................................................................... 6 2. Reproductive Biology.................................................................................................... 7 3. Ecological Roles ............................................................................................................. 7 C. Range and Sites -
Scientific Name Common Name NATURAL ASSOCIATIONS of TREES and SHRUBS for the PIEDMONT a List
www.rainscapes.org NATURAL ASSOCIATIONS OF TREES AND SHRUBS FOR THE PIEDMONT A list of plants which are naturally found growing with each other and which adapted to the similar growing conditions to each other Scientific Name Common Name Acer buergeranum Trident maple Acer saccarum Sugar maple Acer rubrum Red Maple Betula nigra River birch Trees Cornus florida Flowering dogwood Fagus grandifolia American beech Maple Woods Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip-tree, yellow poplar Liquidamber styraciflua Sweetgum Magnolia grandiflora Southern magnolia Amelanchier arborea Juneberry, Shadbush, Servicetree Hamamelis virginiana Autumn Witchhazel Shrubs Ilex opaca American holly Ilex vomitoria*** Yaupon Holly Viburnum acerifolium Maple leaf viburnum Aesulus parvilflora Bottlebrush buckeye Aesulus pavia Red buckeye Carya ovata Shadbark hickory Cornus florida Flowering dogwood Halesia carolina Crolina silverbell Ilex cassine Cassina, Dahoon Ilex opaca American Holly Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip-tree, yellow poplar Trees Ostrya virginiana Ironwood Prunus serotina Wild black cherry Quercus alba While oak Quercus coccinea Scarlet oak Oak Woods Quercus falcata Spanish red oak Quercus palustris Pin oak Quercus rubra Red oak Quercus velutina Black oak Sassafras albidum Sassafras Azalea nudiflorum Pinxterbloom azalea Azalea canescens Piedmont azalea Ilex verticillata Winterberry Kalmia latifolia Mountain laurel Shrubs Rhododenron calendulaceum Flame azalea Rhus copallina Staghorn sumac Rhus typhina Shining sumac Vaccinium pensylvanicum Low-bush blueberry Magnolia -
Spring Celebration SHOPPING GUIDE Photo
Spring Celebration SHOPPING GUIDE Thursday, May 19, 2011 Saturday, May 21, 2011 12 noon to 6 pm 8 am to 2 pm Ogden Botanical Utah State University Gardens Botanical Center Where Utah’s Future Grows. Photo UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY BOTANICAL CENTER 725 South Sego Lily Drive Kaysville, Utah 84037 Phone: 801-593-8969 Fax: 801-593-5330 www.utahbotanicalcenter.org OGDEN BOTANICAL GARDENS 1750 Monroe Blvd. Ogden, Utah 84401 http://extension.usu.edu/weber/htm/ horticulture/ www.ogdenbotanicalgardens.blogspot.com Lawrence Flatman Geranium www.utahbotanicalcenter.org www.ogdenbotanicalgardens.blogspot.com Spring Celebration Shopping Tips Improve your Landscape ~ Support the Gardens Welcome, plant-lovers to our 2011 Spring Celebration Shopper’s Guide. In the following pages you will find both new plants as well as classic favorites, including pictures and descriptions. If you have been to a Utah State University Botanical Center (USUBC) or Ogden Botanical Gardens (OBG) plant sale before you know what a great opportunity it is to find the best plants and horticulture advice for gardens in this area. If this is your first time we hope that you enjoy yourself and we invite you to stroll through the gardens to learn about numerous plants that will beautify your garden from spring until fall. Spring Celebration is your oppor- tunity to speak with knowledgeable horticulturists regarding plant selection, landscape placement, and general care of your plants; just look for individuals wearing either a USUBC or OBG hat or shirt. This year’s sale features trees, shrubs, perennials, annuals, and vegetables which are ideally suited for landscapes along the Wasatch Front. -
State of New York City's Plants 2018
STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species. -
Checklist of Illinois Native Trees
Technical Forestry Bulletin · NRES-102 Checklist of Illinois Native Trees Jay C. Hayek, Extension Forestry Specialist Department of Natural Resources & Environmental Sciences Updated May 2019 This Technical Forestry Bulletin serves as a checklist of Tree species prevalence (Table 2), or commonness, and Illinois native trees, both angiosperms (hardwoods) and gym- county distribution generally follows Iverson et al. (1989) and nosperms (conifers). Nearly every species listed in the fol- Mohlenbrock (2002). Additional sources of data with respect lowing tables† attains tree-sized stature, which is generally to species prevalence and county distribution include Mohlen- defined as having a(i) single stem with a trunk diameter brock and Ladd (1978), INHS (2011), and USDA’s The Plant Da- greater than or equal to 3 inches, measured at 4.5 feet above tabase (2012). ground level, (ii) well-defined crown of foliage, and(iii) total vertical height greater than or equal to 13 feet (Little 1979). Table 2. Species prevalence (Source: Iverson et al. 1989). Based on currently accepted nomenclature and excluding most minor varieties and all nothospecies, or hybrids, there Common — widely distributed with high abundance. are approximately 184± known native trees and tree-sized Occasional — common in localized patches. shrubs found in Illinois (Table 1). Uncommon — localized distribution or sparse. Rare — rarely found and sparse. Nomenclature used throughout this bulletin follows the Integrated Taxonomic Information System —the ITIS data- Basic highlights of this tree checklist include the listing of 29 base utilizes real-time access to the most current and accept- native hawthorns (Crataegus), 21 native oaks (Quercus), 11 ed taxonomy based on scientific consensus. -
Of 3 Exochorda Simplified Standard Protocol
Exochorda Simplified standard protocol: SSP/EXH/4.rev ___________________________________________________________________ Botanical taxon: Exochorda racemosa (Lindl.) Rehder Common Name (when known): Pearl-bush Date of preparation of SSP: 2008 Date of revision of SSP: 17-10-2021 SSP revised by: W.A. Wietsma Sample to be examined: VEGETATIVE Number of growing cycles: 1 year Closing date for applications: 1/12 Submission date/period: 1/3 - 31/3 Seed/Plant Quantity: 10 young plants Able to show all their characteristics in the first year of examination Special conditions sample: None Test station address: Naktuinbouw, Sotaweg 22, 2371 AA, Roelofarendsveen Name: Team Support Variety Testing Department E-mail: [email protected] List of grouping characteristics: NO, (if yes put as annex) Minimum number of plants in trial: Vegetative: 8 Seed: not appl. Minimum number of plants observed by measuring or counting: Vegetative: 1 Seed: not appl. Give description of when observations on the flower should take place: At full flowering Give description of when/where observations on the leaf should take place: At full flowering Give description of when/where the other observations should take place: At full flowering Test will take place: OUTDOORS Uniformity: A population standard of 1% with an acceptance probability of at least 95%. Number of Off-types allowed: one off-type allowed in a sample size of 10 Table of characteristics: PRESENT (see annex) (if present, please annex the table of characteristics and explanations) Literature: PRESENT (when -
PRE Evaluation Report for Malus 'Donald Wyman'
PRE Evaluation Report -- Malus 'Donald Wyman' Plant Risk Evaluator -- PRE™ Evaluation Report Malus 'Donald Wyman' -- Illinois 2017 Farm Bill PRE Project PRE Score: 10 -- Accept (low risk of invasiveness) Confidence: 52 / 100 Questions answered: 20 of 20 -- Valid (80% or more questions answered) Privacy: Public Status: Submitted Evaluation Date: July 19, 2017 This PDF was created on June 15, 2018 Page 1/20 PRE Evaluation Report -- Malus 'Donald Wyman' Plant Evaluated Malus 'Donald Wyman' Image by MBOT Page 2/20 PRE Evaluation Report -- Malus 'Donald Wyman' Evaluation Overview A PRE™ screener conducted a literature review for this plant (Malus 'Donald Wyman') in an effort to understand the invasive history, reproductive strategies, and the impact, if any, on the region's native plants and animals. This research reflects the data available at the time this evaluation was conducted. General Information Status: Submitted Screener: Emily Russell Evaluation Date: July 19, 2017 Plant Information Plant: Malus 'Donald Wyman' If the plant is a cultivar, how does its behavior differs from its parent's? 'Donald Wyman' has a broad, rounded habit. It is a larger crabapple that is sometimes used as a street tree. The flowers are white. The bright red fruit is noted to be "among the most persistent of all crabapples." It is also noted to be resistant to scab, cedar-apple rust, and mildew. 'Donald Wyman' was discovered as a chance seedling at the Arnold Arboretum around 1950. The exact parentage is unknown, but it is likely to have both Malus floribunda and Malus baccata in its genetic make-up. 'Donald Wyman' may be grafted onto a seedling or clonal rootstock. -
Landscaping for Biodiversity with Ohio Native Plants: a Species Guide for Plantings
Department of Park Operations Division of Natural Resources Landscaping for Biodiversity with Ohio Native Plants: A Species Guide for Plantings. Cleveland Metroparks Technical Report 2017 NR/02 Bruce G. Rinker, Daniel T. Moore, Debra K Berry Brian M. Zimmerman Board of Park Commissioners Chief Executive Officer Cleveland Metroparks 4101 Fulton Parkway, Cleveland, Ohio 44114 This page is left intentionally blank 1 Appropriate citation: Hausman, Constance E., Sarah R. Eysenbach, John E. Reinier and Michael F. Breth. 2017. Landscaping for Biodiversity with Ohio Native Plants: A Species Guide for Plantings. Cleveland Metroparks Technical Report 2017/NR-02. Division of Natural Resources, Cleveland Metroparks, Parma, Ohio Cover photos beginning top left clockwise: Native plant rain garden (photo by: Jennifer Grieser), Carpenter Bees on Swamp Milkweed (photo by: Tim Krynak), Native plant rain garden (photo by: Jennifer Grieser) Ohio Buckeye Butterfly on New England Aster (photo by: Tim Krynak) 2 Landscaping for Biodiversity with Ohio Native Plants: A Species Guide for Plantings. Biodiversity encompasses the variety of life and connectedness among species. Incorporating native plants into the landscape provides natural beauty and enhances beneficial interactions by creating habitat, food, nest sites, pollen and nectar sources for various wildlife including pollinators and birds. Our native plants are best adapted to local environments. These adaptations allow plants to have significant impact on local ecosystem services. These ecosystem services include: provisioning (providing food, clean water and fiber), regulating (climate regulation, stormwater management), supporting (nutrient and water cycling) and cultural (gardening, education in nature). In recent years, there has been significant decline in pollinator populations. Bumblebees and butterflies including Monarchs have suffered dramatic, declining populations in the last 20 years.