Taxon Order Family Scientific Name Common Name Non-Native No. of Individuals/Abundance Notes Bees Hymenoptera Andrenidae Calliop

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Taxon Order Family Scientific Name Common Name Non-Native No. of Individuals/Abundance Notes Bees Hymenoptera Andrenidae Calliop Taxon Order Family Scientific Name Common Name Non-native No. of individuals/abundance Notes Bees Hymenoptera Andrenidae Calliopsis andreniformis Mining bee 5 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Apis millifera European honey bee X 20 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Bombus griseocollis Brown belted bumble bee 1 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Bombus impatiens Common eastern bumble bee 12 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Ceratina calcarata Small carpenter bee 9 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Ceratina mikmaqi Small carpenter bee 4 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Ceratina strenua Small carpenter bee 10 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Melissodes druriella Small carpenter bee 6 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Xylocopa virginica Eastern carpenter bee 1 Bees Hymenoptera Colletidae Hylaeus affinis masked face bee 6 Bees Hymenoptera Colletidae Hylaeus mesillae masked face bee 3 Bees Hymenoptera Colletidae Hylaeus modestus masked face bee 2 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Agapostemon virescens Sweat bee 7 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Augochlora pura Sweat bee 1 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Augochloropsis metallica metallica Sweat bee 2 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Halictus confusus Sweat bee 7 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Halictus ligatus Sweat bee 2 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Lasioglossum anomalum Sweat bee 1 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Lasioglossum ellissiae Sweat bee 1 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Lasioglossum laevissimum Sweat bee 1 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Lasioglossum platyparium Cuckoo sweat bee 1 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Lasioglossum versatum Sweat bee 6 Beetles Coleoptera Carabidae Agonum sp. A ground beetle Beetles Coleoptera Carabidae Calathus opaculus LeConte A ground beetle Beetles Coleoptera Carabidae Cosnania pensylvanica (Linnaeus) Long-necked ground beetle Beetles Coleoptera Carabidae Myas coracinus (Say) A ground beetle Beetles Coleoptera Carabidae Pterostichus stigicus (Say) A ground beetle Beetles Coleoptera Carabidae Scarites subterraneus Fabricius Big-headed ground beetle Beetles Coleoptera Cerambycidae Megacyllene robiniae Forster Locust borer Beetles Coleoptera Chrysomelidae Diabrotica undecimpunctata Mannerheim Spotted cucumber beetle Beetles Coleoptera Chrysomelidae Paria fragariae Wilcox Strawberry rootworm Beetles Coleoptera Coccinellidae Harmonia axyridis (Pallas) Multicolored Asian lady beetle X Beetles Coleoptera Curculionidae Pseudocneorhinus bifasciatus (Roelofs) Two-banded Japanese weevil X Beetles Coleoptera Histeridae Hololepta aequalis Say A clown beetle Beetles Coleoptera Hydrophilidae Paracymus sp. A water scavenger beetle Beetles Coleoptera Scarabaeidae Aphodius granarius Linnaeus A scarab beetle X Beetles Coleoptera Staphylinidae Sepedophilus sp. A crab-like rove beetle Beetles Coleoptera Tenebrionidae Tenebroides americanus (Kirby) A darkling beetle Birds Anseriformes Anatidae Branta canadensis Canada Goose 1 Birds Anseriformes Anatidae Aix sponsa Wood Duck 2 Birds Anseriformes Anatidae Anas platyrhynchos Mallard 51 Birds Columbiformes Columbidae Columba livia Rock Pigeon X 33 Birds Columbiformes Columbidae Zenaida macroura Mourning Dove 22 Birds Cuculiformes Cuculidae Coccyzus americanus Yellow-billed Cuckoo 1 Birds Caprimulgiformes Caprimulgidae Chordeiles minor Common Nighthawk 4 Birds Apodiformes Apodidae Chaetura pelagica Chimney Swift 96 Birds Apodiformes Trochilidae Archilochus colubris Ruby-throated Hummingbird 2 Birds Charadriiformes Charadriidae Charadrius vociferus Killdeer 4 Birds Pelecaniformes Ardeidae Ardea herodias Great Blue Heron 3 Birds Pelecaniformes Ardeidae Butorides virescens Green Heron 2 Birds Accipitriformes Pandionidae Pandion haliaetus Osprey 1 Birds Accipitriformes Accipitridae Accipiter cooperii Cooper's Hawk 3 Birds Accipitriformes Accipitridae Buteo lineatus Red-shouldered Hawk 1 Birds Accipitriformes Accipitridae Buteo jamaicensis Red-tailed Hawk 5 Birds Strigiformes Strigidae Strix varia Barred Owl 1 Birds Coraciiformes Alcedinidae Megaceryle alcyon Belted Kingfisher 2 Birds Piciformes Picidae Melanerpes carolinus Red-bellied Woodpecker 8 Birds Piciformes Picidae Picoides pubescens Downy Woodpecker 12 Birds Piciformes Picidae Colaptes auratus Northern Flicker 4 Birds Falconiformes Falconidae Falco sparverius American Kestrel 1 Birds Falconiformes Falconidae Falco peregrinus Peregrine Falcon 1 Birds Passeriformes Tyrannidae Contopus virens Eastern Wood-Pewee 1 Birds Passeriformes Tyrannidae Sayornis phoebe Eastern Phoebe 2 Birds Passeriformes Vireonidae Vireo sp. Vireo sp. 1 Birds Passeriformes Corvidae Cyanocitta cristata Blue Jay 25 Birds Passeriformes Corvidae Corvus brachyrhynchos American Crow 6 Birds Passeriformes Paridae Poecile carolinensis Carolina Chickadee 6 Birds Passeriformes Sittidae Sitta carolinensis White-breasted Nuthatch 3 Birds Passeriformes Troglodytidae Troglodytes aedon House Wren 1 Birds Passeriformes Troglodytidae Thryothorus ludovicianus Carolina Wren 8 Birds Passeriformes Polioptilidae Polioptila caerulea Blue-gray Gnatcatcher 4 Birds Passeriformes Turdidae Sialia sialis Eastern Bluebird 2 Birds Passeriformes Turdidae Catharus fuscescens Veery 1 Birds Passeriformes Turdidae Catharus ustulatus Swainson's Thrush 1 Birds Passeriformes Turdidae Turdus migratorius American Robin 173 Birds Passeriformes Mimidae Dumetella carolinensis Gray Catbird 15 Birds Passeriformes Mimidae Toxostoma rufum Brown Thrasher 1 Birds Passeriformes Sturnidae Sturnus vulgaris European Starling X 263 Birds Passeriformes Bombycillidae Bombycilla cedrorum Cedar Waxwing 14 Birds Passeriformes Passeridae Passer domesticus House Sparrow X 21 Birds Passeriformes Fringillidae Spinus tristis American Goldfinch 19 Birds Passeriformes Parulidae Seiurus aurocapilla Ovenbird 1 Birds Passeriformes Parulidae Mniotilta varia Black-and-white Warbler 1 Birds Passeriformes Parulidae Setophaga ruticilla American Redstart 1 Birds Passeriformes Parulidae Setophaga tigrina Cape May Warbler 1 Birds Passeriformes Parulidae Setophaga americana Northern Parula 1 Birds Passeriformes Parulidae Setophaga magnolia Magnolia Warbler 3 Birds Passeriformes Parulidae Setophaga castanea Bay-breasted Warbler 4 Birds Passeriformes Parulidae Setophaga pensylvanica Chestnut-sided Warbler 1 Birds Passeriformes Parulidae Setophaga coronata Yellow-rumped Warbler 1 Birds Passeriformes Parulidae Setophaga dominica Yellow-throated Warbler 1 Birds Passeriformes Parulidae Setophaga virens Black-throated Green Warbler 2 Birds Passeriformes Emberizidae Spizella passerina Chipping Sparrow 49 Birds Passeriformes Emberizidae Melospiza melodia Song Sparrow 8 Birds Passeriformes Cardinalidae Cardinalis cardinalis Northern Cardinal 39 Birds Passeriformes Icteridae Icterus galbula Baltimore Oriole 2 Butterflies Lepidoptera Pieridae Colias sp. A sulphur 1 Butterflies Lepidoptera Pieridae Colias sp. A sulphur 1 Butterflies Lepidoptera Hesperiidae Polites themistocles Tawny-edged skipper 47 Butterflies Lepidoptera Nymphalidae Phyciodes tharos Pearl crescent 45 Dragonflies & Damselflies Odonata Aeshnidae Aeshna umbrosa Shadow darner 2 Dragonflies & Damselflies Odonata Libellulidae Pantala flavescens Wandering glider 7 Dragonflies & Damselflies Odonata Calopterygidae Calopteryx maculata Ebony jewelwing 4 Dragonflies & Damselflies Odonata Libellulidae Libellula luctuosa Widow skimmer 1 Dragonflies & Damselflies Odonata Coenagrionidae Ishnura verticalis Eastern forktail 1 Fishes Clupeiformes Clupeidae Dorosoma cepedianum Gizzard Shad 2/6 sites Fishes Cypriniformes Cyprinidae Campostoma anomalum Central Stoneroller 6/6 sites Fishes Cypriniformes Cyprinidae Cyprinella spiloptera Spotfin Shiner 5/6 sites Fishes Cypriniformes Cyprinidae Cyprinus carpio Common Carp X 2/6 sites Fishes Cypriniformes Cyprinidae Nocomis micropogon River Chub 2/6 sites Fishes Cypriniformes Cyprinidae Notropis buccatus Silverjaw Minnow 5/6 sites Fishes Cypriniformes Cyprinidae Notropis photogenis Silver Shiner 3/6 sites Fishes Cypriniformes Cyprinidae Notropis rubellus Rosyface Shiner 5/6 sites Fishes Cypriniformes Cyprinidae Notropis stramineus Sand Shiner 5/6 sites Fishes Cypriniformes Cyprinidae Phenacobius mirabilis Suckermouth Minnow 4/6 sites Fishes Cypriniformes Cyprinidae Pimephales notatus Bluntnose Minnow 5/6 sites Fishes Cypriniformes Cyprinidae Pimephales vigilax Bullhead Minnow 1/6 sites Fishes Cypriniformes Cyprinidae Rhinichthys atratulus Blacknose Dace 4/6 sites Fishes Cypriniformes Cyprinidae Semotilus atromaculatus Creek Chub 4/6 sites Fishes Cypriniformes Catostomidae Catostomus commersonii White Sucker 3/6 sites Fishes Cypriniformes Catostomidae Hypentelium nigricans Northern Hog Sucker 4/6 sites Fishes Cypriniformes Catostomidae Moxostoma duquesnei Black Redhorse 5/6 sites Fishes Cypriniformes Catostomidae Moxostoma erythrurum Golden Redhorse 1/6 sites Fishes Cypriniformes Catostomidae Moxostoma macrolepidotum Shorthead Redhorse 2/6 sites Fishes Siluriformes Ictaluridae Ameiurus natalis Yellow Bullhead 6/6 sites Fishes Siluriformes Ictaluridae Ictalurus punctatus Channel Catfish 1/6 sites Fishes Siluriformes Ictaluridae Pylodictis olivaris Flathead Catfish 1/6 sites Fishes Atheriniformes Atherinopsidae Labidesthes sicculus Brook Silverside 3/6 sites Fishes Cyprinodontiformes Fundulidae Fundulus notatus Blackstripe Topminnow 2/6 sites Fishes Cyprinodontiformes Poeciliidae Gambusia affinis Western Mosquitofish 2/6 sites Fishes Scorpaeniformes Cottidae Cottus bairdii Mottled Sculpin 3/6 sites Fishes Perciformes Centrarchidae Ambloplites rupestris Rock Bass 3/6 sites Fishes Perciformes Centrarchidae Lepomis cyanellus Green Sunfish 6/6 sites Fishes Perciformes Centrarchidae Lepomis macrochirus Bluegill
Recommended publications
  • Annotated Check List and Host Index Arizona Wood
    Annotated Check List and Host Index for Arizona Wood-Rotting Fungi Item Type text; Book Authors Gilbertson, R. L.; Martin, K. J.; Lindsey, J. P. Publisher College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Rights Copyright © Arizona Board of Regents. The University of Arizona. Download date 28/09/2021 02:18:59 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/602154 Annotated Check List and Host Index for Arizona Wood - Rotting Fungi Technical Bulletin 209 Agricultural Experiment Station The University of Arizona Tucson AÏfJ\fOTA TED CHECK LI5T aid HOST INDEX ford ARIZONA WOOD- ROTTlNg FUNGI /. L. GILßERTSON K.T IyIARTiN Z J. P, LINDSEY3 PRDFE550I of PLANT PATHOLOgY 2GRADUATE ASSISTANT in I?ESEARCI-4 36FZADAATE A5 S /STANT'" TEACHING Z z l'9 FR5 1974- INTRODUCTION flora similar to that of the Gulf Coast and the southeastern United States is found. Here the major tree species include hardwoods such as Arizona is characterized by a wide variety of Arizona sycamore, Arizona black walnut, oaks, ecological zones from Sonoran Desert to alpine velvet ash, Fremont cottonwood, willows, and tundra. This environmental diversity has resulted mesquite. Some conifers, including Chihuahua pine, in a rich flora of woody plants in the state. De- Apache pine, pinyons, junipers, and Arizona cypress tailed accounts of the vegetation of Arizona have also occur in association with these hardwoods. appeared in a number of publications, including Arizona fungi typical of the southeastern flora those of Benson and Darrow (1954), Nichol (1952), include Fomitopsis ulmaria, Donkia pulcherrima, Kearney and Peebles (1969), Shreve and Wiggins Tyromyces palustris, Lopharia crassa, Inonotus (1964), Lowe (1972), and Hastings et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollinator–Friendly Parks
    POLLINATOR–FRIENDLY PARKS How to Enhance Parks, Gardens, and Other Greenspaces for Native Pollinator Insects Matthew Shepherd, Mace Vaughan, and Scott Hoffman Black The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation, Portland, OR The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation is an international, nonprofit, member–supported organiza- tion dedicated to preserving wildlife and its habitat through the conservation of invertebrates. The Society promotes protection of invertebrates and their habitat through science–based advocacy, conservation, and education projects. Its work focuses on three principal areas—endangered species, watershed health, and pollinator conservation. Copyright © 2008 (2nd Edition) The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation. 4828 SE Hawthorne Boulevard, Portland, OR 97215 Tel (503) 232-6639 Fax (503) 233-6794 www.xerces.org Acknowledgements Thank you to Bruce Barbarasch (Tualatin Hills Park & Recreation District, OR) and Lisa Hamerlynck (City of Lake Oswego, OR) for reviewing early drafts. Their guidance and suggestions greatly improved these guide- lines. Thank you to Eric Mader and Jessa Guisse for help with the plant lists, and to Caitlyn Howell and Logan Lauvray for editing assistance. Funding for our pollinator conservation program has been provided by the Bradshaw-Knight Foundation, the Bullitt Foundation, the Columbia Foundation, the CS Fund, the Disney Wildlife Conservation Fund, the Dudley Foundation, the Gaia Fund, NRCS Agricultural Wildlife Conservation Center, NRCS California, NRCS West National Technical Support Center, the Panta Rhea Foundation, the Richard and Rhoda Goldman Founda- tion, the Turner Foundation, the Wildwood Foundation, and Xerces Society members Photographs We are grateful to Jeff Adams, Scott Bauer/USDA–ARS, John Davis/GORGEous Nature, Chris Evans/ www.forestryimages.com, Bruce Newhouse, Jeff Owens/Metalmark Images, and Edward S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maryland Entomologist
    THE MARYLAND ENTOMOLOGIST Insect and related-arthropod studies in the Mid-Atlantic region Volume 7, Number 2 September 2018 September 2018 The Maryland Entomologist Volume 7, Number 2 MARYLAND ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY www.mdentsoc.org Executive Committee: President Frederick Paras Vice President Philip J. Kean Secretary Janet A. Lydon Treasurer Edgar A. Cohen, Jr. Historian (vacant) Journal Editor Eugene J. Scarpulla E-newsletter Editors Aditi Dubey The Maryland Entomological Society (MES) was founded in November 1971, to promote the science of entomology in all its sub-disciplines; to provide a common meeting venue for professional and amateur entomologists residing in Maryland, the District of Columbia, and nearby areas; to issue a periodical and other publications dealing with entomology; and to facilitate the exchange of ideas and information through its meetings and publications. The MES was incorporated in April 1982 and is a 501(c)(3) non-profit, scientific organization. The MES logo features an illustration of Euphydryas phaëton (Drury) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae), the Baltimore Checkerspot, with its generic name above and its specific epithet below (both in capital letters), all on a pale green field; all these are within a yellow ring double-bordered by red, bearing the message “● Maryland Entomological Society ● 1971 ●”. All of this is positioned above the Shield of the State of Maryland. In 1973, the Baltimore Checkerspot was named the official insect of the State of Maryland through the efforts of many MES members. Membership in the MES is open to all persons interested in the study of entomology. All members receive the annual journal, The Maryland Entomologist, and the monthly e-newsletter, Phaëton.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Illinois Native Trees
    Technical Forestry Bulletin · NRES-102 Checklist of Illinois Native Trees Jay C. Hayek, Extension Forestry Specialist Department of Natural Resources & Environmental Sciences Updated May 2019 This Technical Forestry Bulletin serves as a checklist of Tree species prevalence (Table 2), or commonness, and Illinois native trees, both angiosperms (hardwoods) and gym- county distribution generally follows Iverson et al. (1989) and nosperms (conifers). Nearly every species listed in the fol- Mohlenbrock (2002). Additional sources of data with respect lowing tables† attains tree-sized stature, which is generally to species prevalence and county distribution include Mohlen- defined as having a(i) single stem with a trunk diameter brock and Ladd (1978), INHS (2011), and USDA’s The Plant Da- greater than or equal to 3 inches, measured at 4.5 feet above tabase (2012). ground level, (ii) well-defined crown of foliage, and(iii) total vertical height greater than or equal to 13 feet (Little 1979). Table 2. Species prevalence (Source: Iverson et al. 1989). Based on currently accepted nomenclature and excluding most minor varieties and all nothospecies, or hybrids, there Common — widely distributed with high abundance. are approximately 184± known native trees and tree-sized Occasional — common in localized patches. shrubs found in Illinois (Table 1). Uncommon — localized distribution or sparse. Rare — rarely found and sparse. Nomenclature used throughout this bulletin follows the Integrated Taxonomic Information System —the ITIS data- Basic highlights of this tree checklist include the listing of 29 base utilizes real-time access to the most current and accept- native hawthorns (Crataegus), 21 native oaks (Quercus), 11 ed taxonomy based on scientific consensus.
    [Show full text]
  • Wedge-Shaped Beetles (Suggested Common Name) Ripiphorus Spp. (Insecta: Coleoptera: Ripiphoridae)1 David Owens, Ashley N
    EENY613 Wedge-Shaped Beetles (suggested common name) Ripiphorus spp. (Insecta: Coleoptera: Ripiphoridae)1 David Owens, Ashley N. Mortensen, Jeanette Klopchin, William Kern, and Jamie D. Ellis2 Introduction Ripiphoridae are a family of unusual parasitic beetles that are thought to be related to tumbling flower beetles (Coleoptera: Mordellidae) and blister beetles (Coleoptera: Meloidae). There is disagreement over the spelling of the family (Ripiphoridae) and genus (Ripiphorus) names. Here we use the original spelling that starts with only the letter Figure 1. Adult specimens of the two genera of Ripiphoridae. A) “R”; however, an initial “Rh” has also been used in the Macrosiagon Hentz, and B) Ripiphorus Bosc. scientific community (Rhipiphoridae and Rhipiphorus). Credits: Allen M. Boatman There are an estimated 35 nearctic species of Ripiphorus, Generally, the biology of the family Ripiphoridae is poorly two of which have been collected in Florida: Ripiphorus known. Ripiphorids parasitize bees and wasps (Hymenop- schwarzi LeConte (Figure 2A) and Ripiphorus fasciatus Say tera), roaches (Blattodea), and wood-boring beetles (Co- (Figure 2B). Due to limited information for both of these leoptera). However, the specific hosts for many ripiphorid species, the information presented below is characteristic species are unknown. Furthermore, only one sex (either of the genus Ripiphorus. Information specific to Ripiphorus male or female) has been described for several species, and fasciatus and Ripiphorus schwarzi is presented where the males and females of some species look different. detailed information is available. Two genera of Ripiphoridae infest hymenopteran (bee and wasp) nests: Macrosiagon Hentz (Figure 1A) and Ripiphorus Bosc (formerly Myodites Latreille) (Figure 1B). Species of Macrosiagon are parasites of a variety of hymenopteran families including: Halictidae, Vespidae, Tiphiidae, Apidae, Pompilidae, Crabronidae, and Sphecidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Growing a Wild NYC: a K-5 Urban Pollinator Curriculum Was Made Possible Through the Generous Support of Our Funders
    A K-5 URBAN POLLINATOR CURRICULUM Growing a Wild NYC LESSON 1: HABITAT HUNT The National Wildlife Federation Uniting all Americans to ensure wildlife thrive in a rapidly changing world Through educational programs focused on conservation and environmental knowledge, the National Wildlife Federation provides ways to create a lasting base of environmental literacy, stewardship, and problem-solving skills for today’s youth. Growing a Wild NYC: A K-5 Urban Pollinator Curriculum was made possible through the generous support of our funders: The Seth Sprague Educational and Charitable Foundation is a private foundation that supports the arts, housing, basic needs, the environment, and education including professional development and school-day enrichment programs operating in public schools. The Office of the New York State Attorney General and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation through the Greenpoint Community Environmental Fund. Written by Nina Salzman. Edited by Sarah Ward and Emily Fano. Designed by Leslie Kameny, Kameny Design. © 2020 National Wildlife Federation. Permission granted for non-commercial educational uses only. All rights reserved. September - January Lesson 1: Habitat Hunt Page 8 Lesson 2: What is a Pollinator? Page 20 Lesson 3: What is Pollination? Page 30 Lesson 4: Why Pollinators? Page 39 Lesson 5: Bee Survey Page 45 Lesson 6: Monarch Life Cycle Page 55 Lesson 7: Plants for Pollinators Page 67 Lesson 8: Flower to Seed Page 76 Lesson 9: Winter Survival Page 85 Lesson 10: Bee Homes Page 97 February
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Bee Declines and Changes in Plant-Pollinator Networks Over 125 Years Revealed Through Museum Collections
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Master's Theses and Capstones Student Scholarship Spring 2018 WILD BEE DECLINES AND CHANGES IN PLANT-POLLINATOR NETWORKS OVER 125 YEARS REVEALED THROUGH MUSEUM COLLECTIONS Minna Mathiasson University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis Recommended Citation Mathiasson, Minna, "WILD BEE DECLINES AND CHANGES IN PLANT-POLLINATOR NETWORKS OVER 125 YEARS REVEALED THROUGH MUSEUM COLLECTIONS" (2018). Master's Theses and Capstones. 1192. https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis/1192 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses and Capstones by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WILD BEE DECLINES AND CHANGES IN PLANT-POLLINATOR NETWORKS OVER 125 YEARS REVEALED THROUGH MUSEUM COLLECTIONS BY MINNA ELIZABETH MATHIASSON BS Botany, University of Maine, 2013 THESIS Submitted to the University of New Hampshire in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Biological Sciences: Integrative and Organismal Biology May, 2018 This thesis has been examined and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biological Sciences: Integrative and Organismal Biology by: Dr. Sandra M. Rehan, Assistant Professor of Biology Dr. Carrie Hall, Assistant Professor of Biology Dr. Janet Sullivan, Adjunct Associate Professor of Biology On April 18, 2018 Original approval signatures are on file with the University of New Hampshire Graduate School.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants and a Brief History of the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands
    United States Department of Agriculture Vascular Plants and a Brief Forest Service Rocky Mountain History of the Kiowa and Rita Research Station General Technical Report Blanca National Grasslands RMRS-GTR-233 December 2009 Donald L. Hazlett, Michael H. Schiebout, and Paulette L. Ford Hazlett, Donald L.; Schiebout, Michael H.; and Ford, Paulette L. 2009. Vascular plants and a brief history of the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS- GTR-233. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 44 p. Abstract Administered by the USDA Forest Service, the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands occupy 230,000 acres of public land extending from northeastern New Mexico into the panhandles of Oklahoma and Texas. A mosaic of topographic features including canyons, plateaus, rolling grasslands and outcrops supports a diverse flora. Eight hundred twenty six (826) species of vascular plant species representing 81 plant families are known to occur on or near these public lands. This report includes a history of the area; ethnobotanical information; an introductory overview of the area including its climate, geology, vegetation, habitats, fauna, and ecological history; and a plant survey and information about the rare, poisonous, and exotic species from the area. A vascular plant checklist of 816 vascular plant taxa in the appendix includes scientific and common names, habitat types, and general distribution data for each species. This list is based on extensive plant collections and available herbarium collections. Authors Donald L. Hazlett is an ethnobotanist, Director of New World Plants and People consulting, and a research associate at the Denver Botanic Gardens, Denver, CO.
    [Show full text]
  • Unique Bee Communities Within Vacant Lots and Urban Farms Result from Variation in Surrounding Urbanization Intensity
    sustainability Article Unique Bee Communities within Vacant Lots and Urban Farms Result from Variation in Surrounding Urbanization Intensity Frances S. Sivakoff ID , Scott P. Prajzner and Mary M. Gardiner * ID Department of Entomology, The Ohio State University, 2021 Coffey Road, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; [email protected] (F.S.S.); [email protected] (S.P.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-330-601-6628 Received: 1 May 2018; Accepted: 5 June 2018; Published: 8 June 2018 Abstract: We investigated the relative importance of vacant lot and urban farm habitat features and their surrounding landscape context on bee community richness, abundance, composition, and resource use patterns. Three years of pan trap collections from 16 sites yielded a rich assemblage of bees from vacant lots and urban farms, with 98 species documented. We collected a greater bee abundance from vacant lots, and the two forms of greenspace supported significantly different bee communities. Plant–pollinator networks constructed from floral visitation observations revealed that, while the average number of bees utilizing available resources, niche breadth, and niche overlap were similar, the composition of floral resources and common foragers varied by habitat type. Finally, we found that the proportion of impervious surface and number of greenspace patches in the surrounding landscape strongly influenced bee assemblages. At a local scale (100 m radius), patch isolation appeared to limit colonization of vacant lots and urban farms. However, at a larger landscape scale (1000 m radius), increasing urbanization resulted in a greater concentration of bees utilizing vacant lots and urban farms, illustrating that maintaining greenspaces provides important habitat, even within highly developed landscapes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Complex Calls in Meadow
    THE EVOLUTION OF COMPLEX CALLS IN MEADOW KATYDIDS _______________________________________ A Dissertation presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri-Columbia _______________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy _____________________________________________________ by NATHAN HARNESS Dr. Johannes Schul, Dissertation Supervisor July 2018 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled THE EVOLUTION OF COMPLEX CALLS IN MEADOW KATYDIDS presented by Nathan Harness, a candidate for the degree of doctor of philosophy, and hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Professor Johannes Schul Professor Sarah Bush Professor Lori Eggert Professor Patricia Friedrichsen For my family Rachel and Mayr have given me so much. They show me unselfish affection, endless support, and generosity that seems to only grow. Without them the work here, and the adventure we’ve all three gone on surrounding it, would not have been possible. They have sacrificed birthdays, anniversaries, holidays, and countless weekends and evenings. They’ve happily seen me off to weeks of field work and conference visits. I am thankful to them for being so generous, and completely lacking in resentment at all the things that pull their husband and dad in so many directions. They have both necessarily become adept at melting away anxiety; I will forever be indebted to the hugs of a two-year-old and the kind words of his mom. Rachel and Mayr both deserve far more recognition than is possible here. I also want to thank my parents and brother and sisters.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Kline Assessment Report
    Site Assessment Report Lake Maxinkuckee Environmental Fund – Kline Wetland MARSHALL COUNTY, INDIANA July 31, 2009 Prepared For: Lake Maxinkuckee Environmental Fund 116 North Main Street PO Box 187 Culver, Indiana 46511 (574) 842-3686 Prepared By: 708 Roosevelt Road Walkerton, Indiana 46574 (574) 586-3400 Site Assessment Report July 31, 2009 Lake Maxinkuckee Environmental Fund – Kline Wetland, Marshall County, Indiana PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT REPORT LAKE MAXINKUCKEE ENVIRONMENTAL FUND – KLINE WETLAND TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 2.0 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................. 1 3.0 RESULTS ............................................................................................................. 2 3.1 GENERAL SITE DESCRIPTION ................................................................... 2 3.2 PLANT INVENTORY AND FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT ............... 2 3.3 ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES ..................................................................... 3 3.4 WILDLIFE OBSERVATIONS ......................................................................... 9 3.5 ENDANGERED, THREATENED, AND RARE SPECIES ............................ 10 3.6 FUNCTIONAL QUALITY ............................................................................. 11 3.7 LEVEE AREA .............................................................................................. 12 3.8 POTENTIAL RESULTS
    [Show full text]
  • Maternal Manipulation of Pollen Provisions Affects Worker Production in a Small Carpenter Bee
    Behav Ecol Sociobiol DOI 10.1007/s00265-016-2194-z ORIGINAL ARTICLE Maternal manipulation of pollen provisions affects worker production in a small carpenter bee Sarah P. Lawson1 & Krista N. Ciaccio1 & Sandra M. Rehan1 Received: 22 February 2016 /Revised: 23 June 2016 /Accepted: 28 July 2016 # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016 Abstract Mothers play a key role in determining the body evolution of highly social groups. One of the major transitions size, behavior, and fitness of offspring. Mothers of the small to the formation of highly social groups is division of labor. carpenter bee, Ceratina calcarata, provide smaller pollen By manipulating resource availability to offspring, parents can balls to their first female offspring resulting in the develop- force offspring to remain at the nest to serve as a worker ment of a smaller female. This smaller female, known as the leading to a division of labor between parent and offspring. dwarf eldest daughter, is coerced to stay at the nest to forage In the small carpenter bee, C. calcarata, mothers provide their and feed siblings as a worker. In order to better understand eldest daughter with less food resulting in a smaller adult body how this maternal manipulation leads to the physiological and size. This dwarf eldest daughter (DED) does not have the behavioral differences observed in dwarf eldest daughters, we opportunity to reproduce and serves only as a worker for the characterized and compared the quality of the pollen balls fed colony. In addition to overall reduced investment, we found to theses females vs. other offspring. Our results confirm ear- that mothers also provide a different variety of pollen to her lier studies reporting that there is a female-biased sex alloca- DED.
    [Show full text]