2009 Kline Assessment Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2009 Kline Assessment Report Site Assessment Report Lake Maxinkuckee Environmental Fund – Kline Wetland MARSHALL COUNTY, INDIANA July 31, 2009 Prepared For: Lake Maxinkuckee Environmental Fund 116 North Main Street PO Box 187 Culver, Indiana 46511 (574) 842-3686 Prepared By: 708 Roosevelt Road Walkerton, Indiana 46574 (574) 586-3400 Site Assessment Report July 31, 2009 Lake Maxinkuckee Environmental Fund – Kline Wetland, Marshall County, Indiana PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT REPORT LAKE MAXINKUCKEE ENVIRONMENTAL FUND – KLINE WETLAND TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 2.0 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................. 1 3.0 RESULTS ............................................................................................................. 2 3.1 GENERAL SITE DESCRIPTION ................................................................... 2 3.2 PLANT INVENTORY AND FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT ............... 2 3.3 ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES ..................................................................... 3 3.4 WILDLIFE OBSERVATIONS ......................................................................... 9 3.5 ENDANGERED, THREATENED, AND RARE SPECIES ............................ 10 3.6 FUNCTIONAL QUALITY ............................................................................. 11 3.7 LEVEE AREA .............................................................................................. 12 3.8 POTENTIAL RESULTS OF ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT ......................... 13 4.0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................... 13 REFERENCES ................................................................................................... 17 FIGURES: Figure 1: Location Map Figure 2: Soils Map Figure 3: Plant Community Map Figure 4: ETR Plant Map APPENDIX A IDNR ETR QUERY APPENDIX B VASCULAR PLANT SPECIES INVENTORY APPENDIX C WILDLIFE OBSERVATIONS APPENDIX D ORAM SCORING Page i JFNew #0811188.00 Site Assessment Report Lake Maxinkuckee Environmental Fund – Kline Wetland Marshall County, Indiana 1.0 Introduction Lake Maxinkuckee Environmental Fund contracted with JFNew to complete a floristic inventory, Endangered, Threatened, and Rare (ETR) plant species survey, plant community mapping, and to perform an Ohio Rapid Assessment Method (ORAM) evaluation of the wetland at the Kline Wetland site. The site is located in the northeast ¼ of Section 34 in Township 32 North, Range 1 East, in Marshall County, Indiana (Figure 1). Preliminary field investigations were conducted on May 12, 13, and 30, 2009; a supplemental field investigation was conducted on July 23, 2009. The purpose of the study was to create a functional status report for the Kline Wetland to guide future care and maintenance planning. In addition, Lake Maxinkuckee Environmental Fund was interested in determining what impacts a potential development to the north of the Kline Wetland may have on the Kline Wetland itself. 2.0 Methodology Prior to the site investigations, an ETR species query for the project area was submitted to the Indiana Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) Division of Nature Preserves Natural Heritage Database. The information received in response to this query is included in Appendix A. Two ETR vascular plant species and two bird species appear on the list generated by the IDNR for the project area. A total of 38 person-hours were spent investigating the site on May 12, 13, and 30, 2009 and July 23, 2009. Additional time was spent in the office identifying unknown plant species. The on-site investigation was conducted by a team of two individuals using meander survey methodology, zig-zagging across all portions of the project area. During the meander surveys, all vascular plant species observed and casual wildlife observations were recorded. Plant communities were mapped across the site; within each community, representative photographs were taken and dominant plant species were noted. A search was conducted for ETR plant species during each field survey. Finally, ORAM was applied to the wetland community to obtain a rating of the functional quality of the wetland system. Botanical nomenclature and acronyms, both in the text and in the species inventories, are taken from Rothrock (2004), which references both the Flora of North America Editorial Committee, eds. (1993+) and the Biota of North America database for nomenclature. The Floristic Quality Assessment (FQA) (Rothrock 2004) computer program (Conservation Research Institute / Conservation Design Forum 1999) (Indiana Database) was used to compile the species inventory. Rothrock (2004) assigns each Page 1 JFNew #0811188.00 Site Assessment Report July 31, 2009 Lake Maxinkuckee Environmental Fund – Kline Wetland, Marshall County, Indiana native plant in Indiana a Coefficient of Conservatism value (C value) from 0 to 10, which is a measure of its ability to withstand degradation. Plants with C values of 10 are typically the first to be lost from a site when the site begins to become degraded. Conversely, plants with C values of 0 can withstand a large amount of degradation. The mean C value was determined by averaging the C values of all species identified on the site. The Floristic Quality Index (FQI) is a function of both the C value and the number of species observed at the site. 3.0 Results 3.1 General Site Description The site is located within the Northern Lakes Natural Region (Homoya et al. 1985). This natural region is characterized by glacial freshwater lakes and thick deposits of glacial material. Soils include loam, clay, sandy loam, and muck. Natural communities in the Northern Lakes Natural Region include bog, fen, marsh, prairie, sedge meadow, swamp, seep spring, lake, dry upland forest, dry-mesic upland forest, mesic upland forest, and floodplain forest. The plant communities at the site fit into the description of the Northern Lakes Natural Region. The majority of the interior of the site consists of emergent marsh, sedge meadow, and shrub swamp communities. The uplands surrounding these wetland communities are degraded but appear to have once been characterized by dry-mesic upland forest and savanna species. The soils at the site are within the Riddles-Metea- Wawasee (higher elevation, drier areas) and Houghton-Adrian-Palms (lower elevation, wetter areas) soil map units (United States Department of Agriculture – Soil Conservation Service et al. 1980). Nine soil units are present on the site (Figure 2). The most common soils on the site are Houghton muck, drained and Wawasee sandy loam, 6-12% slopes. Houghton and Adrian soils are located in depressions, in outwash plains, and in lake plains, and formed in bogs and on glacial lakebeds (USDA/SCS 1980). Wawasee and Metea soils are in areas of rolling topography, located on knolls and ridges formed by glacial deposits (USDA/SCS 1980). 3.2 Plant Inventory and Floristic Quality Assessment A total of 324 vascular plant species were identified at the Kline Wetland site in May and July 2009, with an additional four species identified only to genus (Appendix B). 81% (261 of 324) of the species identified are native to Indiana. The mean C value at the site was 3.0, and the FQI value was 53.9. Rothrock (2004) states that “an intact site accommodating the wide array of species characteristic of a pre-settlement plant community would have a mean C of 5 or greater,” and that “an old field or highly degraded sites (Wilhelm et al. 2003) might be expected to have Mean C values of 2 or less.” Of the 324 species identified at the site, 11% (37 of 324) have C values of 7 or greater, and 4% (12 of 324) have C values of 9 or 10. According to Rothrock (2004), plants with C values of 7 or 8 are “found in high-quality remnant plant communities but Page 2 JFNew #0811188.00 Site Assessment Report July 31, 2009 Lake Maxinkuckee Environmental Fund – Kline Wetland, Marshall County, Indiana appear to endure, from time to time, some disturbance,” and those with C values of 9 or 10 are “restricted to remnant landscapes that appear to have suffered very little post- settlement trauma.” 3.3 Ecological Communities Ten distinct ecological communities were mapped at the site (Figure 3). Each of the communities is described below. Several of these communities, noted with an asterisk (*) below, fit within natural community type descriptions published in Jacquart et al. (2002), although they may not be consistent with the minimum size requirements for classification by the State as a natural area. Community A: Emergent Marsh* The Emergent Marsh community is characterized by the presence of mucky hydric soils, wetland hydrology, and emergent, herbaceous wetland vegetation. It consists of a mosaic of open water and characteristic marsh species. This plant community, which occupies most of the northern half of the site, was likely historically a kettle lake that has undergone natural succession and is in the process of becoming a bog community. Dominant plant species in the Emergent Marsh community include Buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis), Swamp Loosestrife (Decodon verticillatus), Rice Cut Grass (Leersia oryzoides), Small Duckweed (Lemna minor), Purple Loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria), Spatterdock (Nuphar advena), Common Arrowhead (Sagittaria latifolia), Common Bur Reed (Sparganium eurycarpum), and Cattail (Typha spp.). The extent of open water versus vegetation cover in the Emergent Marsh likely varies from year
Recommended publications
  • Taxon Order Family Scientific Name Common Name Non-Native No. of Individuals/Abundance Notes Bees Hymenoptera Andrenidae Calliop
    Taxon Order Family Scientific Name Common Name Non-native No. of individuals/abundance Notes Bees Hymenoptera Andrenidae Calliopsis andreniformis Mining bee 5 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Apis millifera European honey bee X 20 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Bombus griseocollis Brown belted bumble bee 1 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Bombus impatiens Common eastern bumble bee 12 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Ceratina calcarata Small carpenter bee 9 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Ceratina mikmaqi Small carpenter bee 4 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Ceratina strenua Small carpenter bee 10 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Melissodes druriella Small carpenter bee 6 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Xylocopa virginica Eastern carpenter bee 1 Bees Hymenoptera Colletidae Hylaeus affinis masked face bee 6 Bees Hymenoptera Colletidae Hylaeus mesillae masked face bee 3 Bees Hymenoptera Colletidae Hylaeus modestus masked face bee 2 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Agapostemon virescens Sweat bee 7 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Augochlora pura Sweat bee 1 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Augochloropsis metallica metallica Sweat bee 2 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Halictus confusus Sweat bee 7 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Halictus ligatus Sweat bee 2 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Lasioglossum anomalum Sweat bee 1 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Lasioglossum ellissiae Sweat bee 1 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Lasioglossum laevissimum Sweat bee 1 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Lasioglossum platyparium Cuckoo sweat bee 1 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Lasioglossum versatum Sweat bee 6 Beetles Coleoptera Carabidae Agonum sp. A ground beetle
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants and a Brief History of the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands
    United States Department of Agriculture Vascular Plants and a Brief Forest Service Rocky Mountain History of the Kiowa and Rita Research Station General Technical Report Blanca National Grasslands RMRS-GTR-233 December 2009 Donald L. Hazlett, Michael H. Schiebout, and Paulette L. Ford Hazlett, Donald L.; Schiebout, Michael H.; and Ford, Paulette L. 2009. Vascular plants and a brief history of the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS- GTR-233. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 44 p. Abstract Administered by the USDA Forest Service, the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands occupy 230,000 acres of public land extending from northeastern New Mexico into the panhandles of Oklahoma and Texas. A mosaic of topographic features including canyons, plateaus, rolling grasslands and outcrops supports a diverse flora. Eight hundred twenty six (826) species of vascular plant species representing 81 plant families are known to occur on or near these public lands. This report includes a history of the area; ethnobotanical information; an introductory overview of the area including its climate, geology, vegetation, habitats, fauna, and ecological history; and a plant survey and information about the rare, poisonous, and exotic species from the area. A vascular plant checklist of 816 vascular plant taxa in the appendix includes scientific and common names, habitat types, and general distribution data for each species. This list is based on extensive plant collections and available herbarium collections. Authors Donald L. Hazlett is an ethnobotanist, Director of New World Plants and People consulting, and a research associate at the Denver Botanic Gardens, Denver, CO.
    [Show full text]
  • Species List For: Labarque Creek CA 750 Species Jefferson County Date Participants Location 4/19/2006 Nels Holmberg Plant Survey
    Species List for: LaBarque Creek CA 750 Species Jefferson County Date Participants Location 4/19/2006 Nels Holmberg Plant Survey 5/15/2006 Nels Holmberg Plant Survey 5/16/2006 Nels Holmberg, George Yatskievych, and Rex Plant Survey Hill 5/22/2006 Nels Holmberg and WGNSS Botany Group Plant Survey 5/6/2006 Nels Holmberg Plant Survey Multiple Visits Nels Holmberg, John Atwood and Others LaBarque Creek Watershed - Bryophytes Bryophte List compiled by Nels Holmberg Multiple Visits Nels Holmberg and Many WGNSS and MONPS LaBarque Creek Watershed - Vascular Plants visits from 2005 to 2016 Vascular Plant List compiled by Nels Holmberg Species Name (Synonym) Common Name Family COFC COFW Acalypha monococca (A. gracilescens var. monococca) one-seeded mercury Euphorbiaceae 3 5 Acalypha rhomboidea rhombic copperleaf Euphorbiaceae 1 3 Acalypha virginica Virginia copperleaf Euphorbiaceae 2 3 Acer negundo var. undetermined box elder Sapindaceae 1 0 Acer rubrum var. undetermined red maple Sapindaceae 5 0 Acer saccharinum silver maple Sapindaceae 2 -3 Acer saccharum var. undetermined sugar maple Sapindaceae 5 3 Achillea millefolium yarrow Asteraceae/Anthemideae 1 3 Actaea pachypoda white baneberry Ranunculaceae 8 5 Adiantum pedatum var. pedatum northern maidenhair fern Pteridaceae Fern/Ally 6 1 Agalinis gattingeri (Gerardia) rough-stemmed gerardia Orobanchaceae 7 5 Agalinis tenuifolia (Gerardia, A. tenuifolia var. common gerardia Orobanchaceae 4 -3 macrophylla) Ageratina altissima var. altissima (Eupatorium rugosum) white snakeroot Asteraceae/Eupatorieae 2 3 Agrimonia parviflora swamp agrimony Rosaceae 5 -1 Agrimonia pubescens downy agrimony Rosaceae 4 5 Agrimonia rostellata woodland agrimony Rosaceae 4 3 Agrostis elliottiana awned bent grass Poaceae/Aveneae 3 5 * Agrostis gigantea redtop Poaceae/Aveneae 0 -3 Agrostis perennans upland bent Poaceae/Aveneae 3 1 Allium canadense var.
    [Show full text]
  • Forage and Habitat for Pollinators in the Northern Great Plains—Implications for U.S
    Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forage and Habitat for Pollinators in the Northern Great Plains—Implications for U.S. Department of Agriculture Conservation Programs Open-File Report 2020–1037 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey A B C D E F G H I Cover. A, Bumble bee (Bombus sp.) visiting a locowood flower. Photograph by Stacy Simanonok, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). B, Honey bee (Apis mellifera) foraging on yellow sweetclover (Melilotus officinalis). Photograph by Sarah Scott, USGS. C, Two researchers working on honey bee colonies in a North Dakota apiary. Photograph by Elyssa McCulloch, USGS. D, Purple prairie clover (Dalea purpurea) against a backdrop of grass. Photograph by Stacy Simanonok, USGS. E, Conservation Reserve Program pollinator habitat in bloom. Photograph by Clint Otto, USGS. F, Prairie onion (Allium stellatum) along the slope of a North Dakota hillside. Photograph by Mary Powley, USGS. G, A researcher assesses a honey bee colony in North Dakota. Photograph by Katie Lee, University of Minnesota. H, Honey bee foraging on alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Photograph by Savannah Adams, USGS. I, Bee resting on woolly paperflower (Psilostrophe tagetina). Photograph by Angela Begosh, Oklahoma State University. Front cover background and back cover, A USGS research transect on a North Dakota Conservation Reserve Program field in full bloom. Photograph by Mary Powley, USGS. Forage and Habitat for Pollinators in the Northern Great Plains—Implications for U.S. Department of Agriculture Conservation Programs By Clint R.V. Otto, Autumn Smart, Robert S. Cornman, Michael Simanonok, and Deborah D. Iwanowicz Prepared in cooperation with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment C: Natural Resources
    Attachment C: Natural Resources A. INTRODUCTION This attachment considers the potential impact of the Proposed Action on natural resources including groundwater, floodplains, wetlands, vegetation, wildlife, and federal- and state-listed rare, threatened, and endangered species. B. METHODOLOGY The existing natural resource conditions in the area of the Proposed Action were identified through a combination of direct field observations as well as the following datasets and other sources of information: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) effective Flood Insurance Rate maps (FIRMs); United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps and Information, Planning, and Conservation (IPaC) System list of threatened, endangered, candidate, and proposed species for Nassau County; New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) tidal and freshwater wetland maps; 2000–2005 Breeding Bird Atlas results for Blocks 6251B and 6251D; NYSDEC New York Nature Explorer site search; NYSDEC New York Natural Heritage Program; and Observations made during field survey conducted at the Proposed Substation site on October 25, 2018 Natural resources identified in the vicinity of the Proposed Action are inventoried below. Field investigations were conducted at the Proposed Substation parcel. Natural resource field investigations were not conducted for the proposed transmission circuits or distribution exit feeders because they will be primarily completed along previously disturbed public roadway rights-of-way (“ROW”) inclusive of road shoulders and sidewalk areas along Plainview Road, Old Country Road, Round Swamp Road and Bethpage Sweet Hollow Road/Spagnoli Road. C. EXISTING CONDITIONS GROUNDWATER The Proposed Action is located within the Nassau-Suffolk Aquifer System, which is a designated Sole Source Aquifer (43 FR 2661 [1978]).
    [Show full text]
  • Persicaria Nepalensis (Polygonaceae), a New Potentially Invasive Anthropophyte in the Polish Flora
    Polish Botanical Journal 59(2): 255–261, 2014 DOI: 10.2478/pbj-2014-0031 PERSICARIA NEPALENSIS (POLYGONACEAE), A NEW POTENTIALLY INVASIVE ANTHROPOPHYTE IN THE POLISH FLORA Tomasz Kowalczyk1, Artur Pliszko & Szymon M. Drobniak Abstract. Persicaria nepalensis (L.) Mill. is an annual herb occurring natively in South, East and Southeast Asia, having a range extending from Oceania to East Africa. Here we report the first Polish stand of this species, found in 2011 near Baligród (Western Bieszczady Mountains), followed by the discovery of two more stands in the surrounding area up to 2013. The floristic composition of vegetation impacted by P. nepalensis is presented, and the invasive potential and pathways of introduction of the species are briefly discussed. Key words: alien species, Bieszczady Mts, Carpathians, distribution, Persicaria nepalensis, Poland Tomasz Kowalczyk & Artur Pliszko, Institute of Botany, Jagiellonian University, M. Kopernika 27, Kraków 31-501, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] Szymon M. Drobniak, Institute of Environmental Science, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 7, Kraków 30-387, Poland, and Anthropological Institute and Museum, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland Introduction Persicaria (L.) Mill. (Polygonaceae) is one of the Materials and methods species-richest genera in the alien flora of Europe, especially in the southern part of the continent Persicaria nepalensis was discovered during floristic sur- veys done in 2011–2013 in the Pogórze Leskie foothills (Lambdon et al. 2008). Some of its species are dis- and in the northern part of the Western Bieszczady Mts tant intercontinental introductions, such as P. pen- (Eastern Carpathians). The researched area is bounded sylvanica (L.) M.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resources Inventory of Wissahickon Valley Watershed Association Preserves and the Green Ribbon Trail
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Research Works (Botany) Botany 2013 Natural Resources Inventory of Wissahickon Valley Watershed Association Preserves and the Green Ribbon Trail Timothy A. Block University of Pennsylvania Ann F. Rhoads University of Pennsylvania C. Skema University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/morrisarboretum_botanyworks Part of the Botany Commons Block, Timothy A.; Rhoads, Ann F.; and Skema, C., "Natural Resources Inventory of Wissahickon Valley Watershed Association Preserves and the Green Ribbon Trail" (2013). Research Works (Botany). 19. https://repository.upenn.edu/morrisarboretum_botanyworks/19 Submitted to the Wissahickon Valley Watershed Association This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/morrisarboretum_botanyworks/19 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Natural Resources Inventory of Wissahickon Valley Watershed Association Preserves and the Green Ribbon Trail Abstract The purpose of this study is to provide The Wissahickon Valley Watershed Association with baseline information needed to help guide appropriate resource management and education decisions. The area under consideration in this study includes the named preserves of the Wissahickon Valley Watershed Association (WVWA) (approximately 331 acres), and the Green Ribbon Trail and associated WVWA-owned lands from the trailhead at the Upper Gwynedd Township Park in North Wales to the boundary of Fort Washington State Park near Skippack Pike, a distance of about 13.1 kilometers (8.14 miles) not counting the trail interruption at the Cedarbrook Country Club. Disciplines Botany Comments Submitted to the Wissahickon Valley Watershed Association This technical report is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/morrisarboretum_botanyworks/ 19 Natural Resources Inventory of Wissahickon Valley Watershed Association Preserves and the Green Ribbon Trail Timothy A.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Wetland Plants of Colorado's Eastern Plains
    Common Wetland Plants of Colorado’s Eastern Plains A Pocket Guide Second Edition Prepared for: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8 1595 Wynkoop Street Denver, CO 80202-1129 Prepared by: Denise R. Culver Colorado Natural Heritage Program Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523-1475 2018 Acknowledgements: The Common Wetland Plants of the Eastern Plains: A Pocket Guide , First Edition, was funded by an U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8, Wetland Program Development Grant (CD 968121212) with oversight from Mitra Jha and Cynthia Gonzales. Brian Sullivan, Colorado Parks and Wildlife Wetlands Program Coordinator, and Colorado State University provided in-kind match. The Second Edition was funded by an U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8, Wetlands Program Development Grant (CD 96852201. Funding for the printing of the second edition was provided in part by Tass Kelso and George Maentz. Layout and copy editing: Kirstin Holfelder, Puja Gurung, and Sierra Crumbaker Book Reviewers: Pam Smith, Bernadette Kuhn, Joanna Lemly, Laurie Gilligan, and Claire Tortorelli Printed by: Frederic Printing, Aurora, Colorado Front Cover Photographs: playa-Denise Culver, northern water plantain-Neal Kramer, Baltic rush-Keir Morse, alkali buttercup-Steve Matson, Nebraska sedge-Trent M. Draper, smartweed-Matt Below Back Cover Photograph: Michael Menefee Opposite Page Photograph: John Fielder Willow, sparrow, and grebe drawings: Jim Carroll Email: [email protected] http://www.cnhp.colostate.edu
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Cover (Monarch Habitat) S
    Conservation Cover (Monarch Habitat) S. C. Practice Job Sheet 327 Prepared for: Prepared by: Farm: Tract: Date: _____________ Monarch on Ironweed (Vernonia, by Judy Stierand) Monarch caterpillar on Asclepias tuberosa (by Nancy Adamson) Monarch egg Monarch on Asclepias (monarchnet.uga.edu) incarnata (by Judy Stierand) Photo by Judy Stierand DEFINITION Monarchs cannot survive without habitat that includes milkweed (Asclepias species, but also milkvine and swallow-wort) on which to lay eggs. Their caterpillars (larval stage of monarch life cycle) primarily eat plants in the Asclepiadaceae family. With shifting land management practices, essential habitat has been lost from the landscape and monarch populations have drastically declined. Stands of other beneficial native wildflowers and grasses provide nectar, pollen, and structure. Native bunch grasses can assist herbaceous wildflowers in staying upright, while providing cover and sites for pupation/metamorphosis. Native woody plants (trees, shrubs, vines) are also important nectar sources for monarchs, especially during spring when they migrate north. PURPOSE • Provide nectar and pollen for monarch butterflies throughout the growing season • Provide host sites (milkweed, milkvine, or swallow-wort) for monarch larvae • Provide cover (protection from weather and predators) and structure (pupation locations) WHERE USED • Odd or converted areas within farmland margins, field borders, old fields with low plant diversity, logging decks, or areas where exotic plants have been removed (including pasture grasses). • Locations with at least six hours of sunlight. • Areas where exotic invasive plant infestations will be removed or have previously been removed. • Where habitat can be protected from pesticides (they can harm caterpillars and adults). OPERATIONS Pre-planting: Scout the areas at least one year prior to the planned seeding date.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Seed School
    FEDERAL SEED SCHOOL SEED PURITY AND IDENTIFICATION HANDOUTS August 5 – 7, 2013 USDA, AMS, LPS Seed Regulatory and Testing Division 801 Summit Crossing Place, Suite C Gastonia, North Carolina 28054 704-810-8870; fax 704-852-4189 http://www.ams.usda.gov/seed FEDERAL SEED SCHOOL August 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page USDA, AMS Seed Regulatory and Testing Division – Personnel and Areas of Responsibility .... 1 USDA Publications and Helpful Internet Sites ............................................................................... 2-3 PURITY AND SEED IDENTIFICATION Some possible sources of non-uniformity in test results .................................................................. 4-5 Grass Family Structural Features .................................................................................................... 6 Grass Seed Structures ..................................................................................................................... 7-9 Seed Terms and Shapes .................................................................................................................. 10 References in Federal Seed Act Regulations regarding seed units and pure seed in grasses ......... 11 Understanding Grass Family Seed Units, by D.J. Meyer ............................................................... 12-22 Agropyron spp. Nomenclature Changes ......................................................................................... 23-24 Wheatgrasses and Quackgrass Comparison of Seed Characteristics .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial & Palustrine Plant Communities of Pennsylvania 2Nd
    Terrestrial & Palustrine Plant Communities of Pennsylvania 2nd Ed. Section 2 Palustrine Communities Palustrine Forests Coniferous Palustrine Forests Black Spruce – Tamarack Palustrine Woodland System: Palustrine Subsystem: Woodland PA Ecological Group(s): Basin Wetland Global Rank: G3G5 State Rank: S2 General Description This describes a group of wetland woodlands found mostly in glacially formed, ice-block depressions (kettleholes) of small, higher-elevation watersheds of the glaciated regions of Pennsylvania and in cold- air pockets of drainages at higher elevations of the Unglaciated Allegheny Plateau. These wetlands are dominated by a mixture of black spruce (Picea mariana) and tamarack (Larix laricina). These are trees of short stature (<30 feet) growing as a sparse overstory (<40% cover). The substrate consists of deep, poorly decomposed peat. The woodland is often found interior (i.e., closer to the middle of the wetland) to the Black Spruce-Tamarack Peatland Forest and on the edge of the low-shrub bog. There is generally very little groundwater or surface water enrichment in these systems, resulting in nutrient stressed, stunted trees. Other trees that may occur include gray birch (Betula populifolia) and red maple (Acer rubrum). The sparse woodland gives way to tall black spruce and tamarack (Black Spruce – Tamarack Peatland Forest) away from the bog mat and this peatland forest gives way to a fringe of hemlock and other tall trees at the outer edge of the wetland where organic soils thin and become mineral. At this interface
    [Show full text]
  • Plum Island Biodiversity Inventory
    Plum Island Biodiversity Inventory New York Natural Heritage Program Plum Island Biodiversity Inventory Established in 1985, the New York Natural Heritage NY Natural Heritage also houses iMapInvasives, an Program (NYNHP) is a program of the State University of online tool for invasive species reporting and data New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry management. (SUNY ESF). Our mission is to facilitate conservation of NY Natural Heritage has developed two notable rare animals, rare plants, and significant ecosystems. We online resources: Conservation Guides include the accomplish this mission by combining thorough field biology, identification, habitat, and management of many inventories, scientific analyses, expert interpretation, and the of New York’s rare species and natural community most comprehensive database on New York's distinctive types; and NY Nature Explorer lists species and biodiversity to deliver the highest quality information for communities in a specified area of interest. natural resource planning, protection, and management. The program is an active participant in the The Program is funded by grants and contracts from NatureServe Network – an international network of government agencies whose missions involve natural biodiversity data centers overseen by a Washington D.C. resource management, private organizations involved in based non-profit organization. There are currently land protection and stewardship, and both government and Natural Heritage Programs or Conservation Data private organizations interested in advancing the Centers in all 50 states and several interstate regions. conservation of biodiversity. There are also 10 programs in Canada, and many NY Natural Heritage is housed within NYS DEC’s participating organizations across 12 Latin and South Division of Fish, Wildlife & Marine Resources.
    [Show full text]