DOCSLIB.ORG

Preliminary List of Species Native Within the Adirondack Park Listed Alphabetically by Common Name and Sorted by Habit V.1 Updated 10.23.2006

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Preliminary List of Species Native Within the Adirondack Park Listed Alphabetically by Common Name and Sorted by Habit V.1 Updated 10.23.2006 Preliminary List of Species Native Within the Adirondack Park Listed Alphabetically by Common Name and Sorted by Habit v.1 Updated 10.23.2006 Purpose The purpose of this list is to provide an information resource to those wishing to plant or otherwise propagate plants native to the Adirondack Park. It could be used by an individual or a group developing a landscaping plan and wishing to use species native to the Park and a particular county. They could use the list as a source of native species and request nurserymen to provide plant materials from it. Although most of these species are not now available from commercial nurseries, it may be that if continued requests are made for them, the nursery industry would see fit to propagate the desired plants. Requesting and planting natives would reduce the call for non-native and potentially invasive species. It should be noted that some of these species will most likely never be sold commercially because of rarity or difficulty in propagation. The list is meant to being a living document with species added and deleted as additional information is collected and verified. Although it may be tempting, plants should never be harvested from the wild. In fact some of these plants are legally protected, and no harvesting can occur on State lands. Refer to the New York Natural Heritage Program website (http://www.dec.state.ny.us/website/dfwmr/heritage/plants.htm) for a complete treatment of New York State protected plants and federal and State laws regarding rare plants. Source The source of this list is the New York Flora Atlas produced by the New York Flora Association and available online at http://atlas.nyflora.org . Nomenclature follows the New York Flora Atlas. The list was created by searching the digital atlas for those species native to Warren, Herkimer, Hamilton, Franklin, Essex, and Clinton counties (only those county whose land area falling totally or mainly within the Park were searched), adding those species noted by Kudish in Adirondack Upland Flora (1992) and by adding additional species the compiler knows to be present within the Park but for which voucher specimens may not exist. Note two things. First, only Hamilton and Essex counties fall totally within the boundaries of the Park, hence some of the species on this list may not actually be present in the Park but are found in that portion of a county outside the Park. More work needs to be done to determine if these species are truly present in the Park. Second, the New York Flora Atlas only includes those species where a voucher specimen is present. Some widespread species may not be noted as present in all counties because a voucher specimen has never been collected. The key to the county presence list is: E = Essex SL = St. Lawrence O = Oneida H = Hamilton W = Warren C = Clinton Wa = Washington L = Lewis F = Franklin He = Herkimer Fu = Fulton S = Saratoga “All” indicates that the species is recorded in all counties in the Park. “Except” means that the species is found in all the counties in the Park except those listed. Two species of note: Phalaris arundinacea, reed canary grass, is a native species but undesirable to plant due to its aggressive, invasive behavior, and Ptelea trifoliata ssp. trifoliata, wafer-ash, is native to NYS outside the Park but is naturalized, and seemingly non- invasive, in Warren County. The species are further described by their habit (Tree, Tree (small), Shrub, Herb, Vine, Graminoid, Aquatic), wetland indicator status (OBL, FACW, FAC, FACU), and NYS Heritage Program rarity rank. I used my subjective experience in determining whether a species was a small tree or a large shrub, and I included the clubmosses with Herbs though not typically thought of in this way. 1 Wetland Indicator Status The wetland indicator status was assigned using the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988, New York (Reed 1988). There were differences in nomenclature, especially at variety or subspecies levels. These were resolved by referring to Mitchell and Tucker (1997) and the New York Flora Atlas. Explanation of Wetland Indicator Status Categories OBL – Obligate species occur almost always (estimated probability >99%) under natural conditions in wetlands. FACW – Facultative wetland species usually occur in wetlands (estimated probability 67%-99%), but are occasionally found in nonwetlands. FAC – Facultative species are equally likely to occur in wetlands or nonwetlands (estimated probability 34%- 66%). FACU – Facultative upland species usually occur in nonwetlands (estimated probability 67%-99%), but are occasionally found in wetlands (estimated probability 1%-33%). The positive (+) and negative (-) signs are used to more s\pecifically define the frequency of occurrence in wetlands. The positive sign indicates that the species is more frequently found in wetlands, and the negative sign indicates that the species is less frequently found in wetlands. Species without a wetland indicator status have either not been assessed or have been determined to be obligate upland species that occur almost always (estimated probability >99%) under natural conditions in nonwetlands. Rarity Ranking The rarity ranking was assigned using the New York Flora Atlas which includes the New York State Natural Heritage Program (http://www.dec.state.ny.us/website/dfwmr/heritage/plants.htm) rarity rankings. These rarity ranks are maintained by NatureServe (www.natureserve.org) and are used by Natural Heritage programs in every state. They are not linked to any legal penalties but provide information used for determining state and federal legal status of rare plants. Explanation of Heritage Ranks and Codes Each taxon has a global and state rank. The global rank reflects the rarity of the species throughout the world and the state rank reflects the rarity within New York State. GLOBAL RANK G1 = Critically imperiled throughout its range due to extreme rarity (5 or fewer sites or very few remaining individuals) or extremely vulnerable to extinction due to biological factors. G2 = Imperiled throughout its range due to rarity (6 - 20 sites or few remaining individuals) or highly vulnerable to extinction due to biological factors. G3 = Either very rare and local throughout its range (21 - 100 sites), with a restricted range (but possibly locally abundant), or vulnerable to extinction due to biological factors. G4 = Apparently secure throughout its range (but possibly rare in parts). G5 = Demonstrably secure throughout its range (but possibly rare in parts). GH = No extant sites known but it may be rediscovered. GX = Species believed extinct. 2 TU & T? = Status of the subspecies or variety unknown. STATE RANK S1 = Critically imperiled in New York State because of extreme rarity (5 or fewer sites or very few remaining individuals) or extremely vulnerable to extirpation from New York State due to biological or human factors. S2 = Imperiled in New York State because of rarity (6 - 20 sites or few remaining individuals) or highly vulnerable to extirpation from New York State due to biological or human factors. S3 = Rare in New York State (usually 21 - 35 extant sites). S4 = Apparently secure in New York State. S5 = Demonstrably secure in New York State. SH = Historical. No existing sites known in New York State in the last 20-30 years but it may be rediscovered. SX = Apparently extirpated from New York State, very low probability of rediscovery. SR = Reported from the state, but existence has not been documented. SU = Status uncertain because of the cryptic nature of the plant. TAXON RANK The T-ranks are defined in the same way as the Global ranks, but the T-rank only refers to the rarity of the subspecific taxon, not the rarity of the species as a whole. If a species has a subspecific name that is the same as the species name it means there is also another subspecies of that species which we do not consider rare in New York or it does not occur in New York. DOUBLE RANKS (i.e., S1S2, S2S3, S1S3) The first rank indicates rarity based upon current documentation. The second rank indicates the probable rarity after all historical records and likely habitat have been checked. Double ranks denote species that need additional field surveys. A "Q" indicates a question exists whether or not the taxon is a good taxonomic entity. A "?" indicates that an identification question exists about known occurrences. It also indicates the rank presumably corresponds to actual occurrences even though the information has not yet been documented in heritage files or historical records. It serves to flag species that need more field studies or specimen identification. Contact and Questions Corrections and additions will be made as discovered and the list will be updated. The list has also been alphabetized by “Common Name” and is available at the Agency’s website. All corrections to or comments and questions about this list including additional species or other information should be directed to: Daniel M. Spada Supervisor, Natural Resource Analysis NYS Adirondack Park Agency Box 99 Ray Brook, New York 12977 518.891.4050 3 Trees and Small Trees Common Name Scientific Name Family Habit Wetland Rarity County Indicator Rank Presence Status Amelanchier, Running Amelanchier stolonifera Rosaceae Tree S5G5 Except F, H, Fu, (small) He Ash, Black Fraxinus nigra Oleaceae Tree FACW S5** Except C, O, S, Fu Ash, Green Fraxinus pennsylvanica Oleaceae Tree FACW S5G5 SL, O, L, W, E, S, Wa Ash, White Fraxinus americana Oleaceae Tree FACU S5G5 All Aspen, Bigtooth Populus
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pdf 550.58 K
    Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research (2014),13 (supplement): 195-198 Copyright © 2014 by School of Pharmacy Received: December 2013 Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences and Health Services Accepted: December 2013 Original Article Screening of 20 Commonly Used Iranian Traditional Medicinal Plants Against Urease Mahmood Biglara, Hessameddin Sufia, Kowsar Bagherzadeha, Massoud Amanloua and Faraz Mojabb* aDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Science Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. bDepartment of Pharmacognosy, School of Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Abstract Infection with Helicobacter pyloriis the most common cause of stomach and duodenal ulcers. About more than 80 % of people are infected with H. pylori in developing countries. H. pylori uses urease enzyme product “ammonia” in order to neutralize and protect itself from the stomach acidic condition and urease enzyme activity has been shown to be essential to the colonization of H. pylori. Inhibitory activity of 20 traditional medicinal plants were examined and evaluated against Jack bean urease activity by Berthelot reaction to obtains natural sources of urease inhibitors. Each herb was extracted using 80% aqueous methanol, then tested its IC50 value was determined. Eight of the whole 20 studied plants crude extracts were found the most effective with IC50 values of less than 100 µg/mL including Laurus nobilis, Zingiber officinale, Nigella sativa, Angelica archangelica, Acorus calamus, Allium sativum,Curcuma longa, and Citrus aurantium extracts, from which most potent urease inhibitory was observed for Zingiber officinale, Laurus nobilis, and Nigella sativa with IC50 values of 48.54, 48.69 and 59.10 µg/mL, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts
    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
    [Show full text]
  • Erowid Extracts — Number 13 / November 2007 Erowid Extracts Table of Contents Number 13, November 2007
    Erowid® Extracts D OCUMENTING THE C OMPLEX R ELATIONSHIP B ETWEEN H UMANS AN D P SYCHOACTIVES November 2007 Number 13 “The problem to be faced is: how to combine loyalty to one’s own tradition with reverence for different traditions.” — Abraham J. Heschel The Absinthe Enigma • Wormwood and Thujone • P. viridis vs. M. tenuiflora Varieties of Nicotine Experience • Khat Legal Challenges LETTERS & FEEDBACK Hi there Erowid staff, First of all, thank you for such Awesome website! A more thoughtfully a wonderful site. I’m not a serious compiled compendium of information I’m just writing to say how much I recreational user, but having some on the topic of psychoactives does appreciate your website. My father chronic pain issues, I tend to experiment not exist—at least not for the public showed it to me several years ago a little to find ways to alleviate the at large. Bravo. and it’s been fun to watch it grow pain (aside from standard Rx’s from in quality and content over the — ANOnymOus doctors). […] years. My dad adjunctly teaches a Letter to Erowid psychopharmacology class in town and Keep up the good work. Although always lists Erowid on his syllabus of some might look at Erowid negatively, recommended readings. I’m a college I look at it positively, in the sense that After looking up information on the student and am surprised, once I I’m smart enough to research things antitussive properties of DXM, how start talking to other kids, how many before I try them, and hopefully keep shocked I was to find your website, of them know about the information myself from an early demise.
    [Show full text]
  • Relationship of Insects to the Spread of Azalea Flower Spot
    TECHNICAL BULLETIN NO. 798 • JANUARY 1942 Relationship of Insects to the Spread of Azalea Flower Spot By FLOYD F. SMITH Entomologist» Division of Truck Crop and Garden Insect Investigations Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine and FREJEMAN WEISS Senior Pathologist, Division of Mycology and Disease Survey Bureau of Plant Industry UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, WASHINGTON* D* C. For sale by the Superintendent of'Documents, Washington, D. G. • Price 10 cents Technical Bulletin No. 798 • January 1942 Relationship of Insects to the Spread of Azalea Flower Spot ^ By FLOYD F. SMITH, entomologist, Division of Truck Crop and Garden Insect Investigations, Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine, and FREEMAN WEISS, senior pathologist. Division of Mycology and Disease Survey, Bureau of Plant Industry ^ CONTENTS Page Page Introduction ' 1 Disease transmission by insects II Insects visiting azaleas and observations on Preliminary studies, 1934 and 1935 11 their habits 2 Improved methods for collecting insects Bumblebees 2 and testing their infectivity 12 Carpenter bees 4 Studies in 1936 18 Ground-nesting bees 5 Transmission of flower spot on heads or Honeybees 5 legs or on pollen from insects- 20 Thrips 5 Transmission tests in 1937 and 1938 20 Ants 5 Relationship of insects to primary infection. 29 Flies 6 Other relationships of insects to the disease 33 Activity of bees in visiting flowers 6 Control experiments with insects on azaleas -. 39 Cause of insect abrasions and their relationship * E fîect of insecticid al dusts on bees 39 to flower spot infection < 7 Eiïect of poisoned sprays on bees 40 Occurrence on insects of conidia of the organ- Discussion of results 40 ism causing azalea flower spot 10 Summary 41 INTRODUCTION A serious spot disease and tlight was first reported in April 1931 near Charleston, S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Plant Species List
    Acanthaceae Hygrophila Occasional lacustris Acanthaceae Justicia ovata Uncommon Acanthaceae Ruellia humilis Common Acanthaceae Ruellia nudiflora s.n. Uncommon Acanthaceae Ruellia Occasional pedunculata Aceraceae Acer rubrum Occasional Agavaceae Yucca louisianica Uncommon Aiozaceae Molluga Occasional verticillata Alismataceae Echinodorus Occasional cordifolius Alismataceae Sagittaria Rare papillosa Alismataceae Sagittaria 156 Uncommon platyphylla Alliaceae Allium Occasional canadense var. canadense Alliaceae Allium Occasional canadense var. mobilense Alliaceae Allium 96, Uncommon drummondii 124 (Keith 96, 124) Amaranthaceae Alternanthera Common philoxeroides Amaryllidaceae Hymenocallis Uncommon liriosome Anacardiaceae Rhus aromatica Uncommon Anacardiaceae Rhus copallinum Occasional Anacardiaceae Toxicodendron Frequent radicans Apiaceae Bifora americana Common Apiaceae Centella erecta Uncommon Apiaceae Chaerophyllum Uncommon tainturieri Apiaceae Cicuta Uncommon maculatum Apiaceae Cynosciadium Uncommon digitatum Apiaceae Eryngium Common yuccifolium Apiaceae Hydrocotyle Occasional verticillata Apiaceae Polytaenia Frequent texana Apiaceae Ptilimnium Common capillaceum Apiaceae Ptilimnium Common nuttallii Apiaceae Spermolepsis Common inermis Apiaceae Torilis arvensis Occasional Apocynaceae Apocynum Occasional cannibinum Apocynaceae Nerium oleander Rare Apocynaceae Trachelospermu Occasional m difforme Aquifoliaceae Ilex decidua Common Aquifoliaceae Ilex opaca Common Aquifoliaceae Ilex vomitoria Abundant Araceae Arisaema Rare dracontium Araceae
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation of Eastern European Medicinal Plants Arnica Montana in Romania Management Plan
    Conservation of Eastern European Medicinal Plants Arnica montana in Romania Case Study Gârda de Sus Management Plan Barbara Michler 2007 Projekt Leader: Dr. Susanne Schmitt, Dr. Wolfgang Kathe (maternity cover) WWF-UK Panda House, Weyside Park, Godalming, Surrey GU7 1XR, United Kingdom Administration: Michael Balzer and team WWF-DCP Mariahilfer-Str. 88a/3/9 A-1070 Wien Austria Projekt Manager: Maria Mihul WWF-DCP 61, Marastu Bdv. 3rd floor, 326/327/328 Sector 1, Bucharest, RO-71331 Romania With financial support of the Darwin Initiative Area 3D, Third Floor, Nobel House 17 Smith Square, London SW1P 3JR United Kingdom Project Officer: Dr. Barbara Michler Dr. Fischer, ifanos-Landschaftsökologie Forchheimer Weg 46 D-91341 Röttenbach Germany Local Coordinator: Dr. Florin Pacurar University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine (USAMV) Department of Fodder Production & Conservation Cluj-Napoca, Romania Major of the community Gârda de Sus Alba Iulia Romania Acknowledgements I am very grateful to a number of people who were involved in the process of the project over the last 6 years (including 3 previous years under Project Apuseni). Thanks to all of them (alphabetic order): Apuseni Nature Park: Alin Mos Arnica project team: Mona Cosma, Valentin Dumitrescu, Dr. Wolfgang Kathe, Adriana Morea, Maria Mihul, Michael Klemens, Dr. Florin Pacurar, Horatiu Popa, Razvan Popa, Bobby Pelger, Gârda Nicoleta, Dr. Susanne Schmitt, Luminita Tanasie Architects for Humanity: Chris Medland Babes-Bolyai University Cluj-Napoca (UBB) represented by Prof. Dr. Laszlo Rakosy Community Gârda de Sus, represented by the major Marin Virciu Darwin Initiative, London Drying (data collection): Bîte Daniela, Broscăţan Călin, Câmpean Sorin, Cosma Ramona, Dumitrescu Valentin, Feneşan Iulia, Gârda Nicoleta, Klemens Michael, Morea Adriana, Neag Cristina, Păcurar Adriana, Paşca Aniela, Pelger Bogdan, Rotar Bogdan, Spătăceanu Lucia, Tudose Sorina Ethnography: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia's Azalea Lady Ken Gohring—Marietta, Georgia
    Georgia's Azalea Lady Ken Gohring—Marietta, Georgia ne of the most ,.„ ..... 1119111 largest private collection in the Southeast, if not the entire O picturesque sites country. Most of Joan's azaleas have been collected from in the South is the city native areas nearby her Newnan home. ...eA rr of Newnan, Georgia, The Adcock garden is a part of an attractive small located about 40 miles farm located in a rustic area south of Newnan. The home southeast of Atlanta, is surrounded by a large planting of mature native azaleas boasting a population of varying colors that accent the home's perimeter. The of more than 24,000 home is situated in a sparse pine forest that filters direct citizens. Newnan sunlight, preventing sunburn of the plants but allowing features scores of at- good light to ensure good bloom set. The main garden is tractive homes and is located at the rear of the home and extends into the pine proudly known as the understory. city of homes. Newnan The Adcock garden consists mostly of Oconee aza- is home of country • Joan Adcock leas, Rhododendron flammeum, and most likely hybrids of music star Alan Jack- Oconee and the Piedmont azalea, R. canescens. Joan's son. The late writer-humorist Lewis Grizzard, raised in collection also includes other native species, including a nearby Moreland, attended high school in Newnan. One large collection of Plumleaf azaleas, R. prunifolium. She of the current residents of this charming city is a delight- also has R. minus var. carolinium in her collection. ful southern lady, named Joan Adcock.
    [Show full text]
  • THE USE of BIOTECHNOLOGY for SUPPLYING of PLANT MATERIAL for TRADITIONAL CULTURE of MEDICINAL, RARE SPECIES Arnica Montana L
    Lucrări Ştiinţifice – vol. 57 (1) 2014, seria Agronomie THE USE OF BIOTECHNOLOGY FOR SUPPLYING OF PLANT MATERIAL FOR TRADITIONAL CULTURE OF MEDICINAL, RARE SPECIES Arnica montana L. Iuliana PANCIU1, Irina HOLOBIUC2, Rodica CĂTANĂ2 e-mail: [email protected] Abstract Taking into account the importance of Arnica montana, the attempts to improve the culture technologies are justified. Our study had the aim to optimize in vitro plant multiplication and growth as a source of plants for traditional culture in this species. Aseptic germinated seedlings were used as explants, apical meristem being the origin of the direct morphogenesis process. For induction of regeneration, to promote plant growth and rooting, we used some combination of growth factors and supplements as ascorbic acid, glutamine, PVP and active charcoal added in culture media based on MS formula. We improved the efficiency of micropropagation, the best values were recorded on variant supplemented with PVP –.7 regenerants/explant in the first 4 weeks and increasing at 17/ initial explant ( mean 14.62) after 8 weeks. Concerning the germination capacity of the seeds scored after 2 weeks in sterile condition, the rate was 47.76 and in non-sterile conditions, the rate varied depending of the substrate used. Comparing to the plants obtained through traditional seeds germination, in vitro plants grew faster and were more vigourously. The micropropagation protocol in Arnica montana L. allowed us to regenerate healthy, developed and rooted plants in the second subculture cycle. This in vitro methodology can provide plant material for initiation of a conventional culture after acclimatization of the obtained vitroplants.
    [Show full text]
  • National Wetlands Inventory Map Report for Quinault Indian Nation
    National Wetlands Inventory Map Report for Quinault Indian Nation Project ID(s): R01Y19P01: Quinault Indian Nation, fiscal year 2019 Project area The project area (Figure 1) is restricted to the Quinault Indian Nation, bounded by Grays Harbor Co. Jefferson Co. and the Olympic National Park. Appendix A: USGS 7.5-minute Quadrangles: Queets, Salmon River West, Salmon River East, Matheny Ridge, Tunnel Island, O’Took Prairie, Thimble Mountain, Lake Quinault West, Lake Quinault East, Taholah, Shale Slough, Macafee Hill, Stevens Creek, Moclips, Carlisle. • < 0. Figure 1. QIN NWI+ 2019 project area (red outline). Source Imagery: Citation: For all quads listed above: See Appendix A Citation Information: Originator: USDA-FSA-APFO Aerial Photography Field Office Publication Date: 2017 Publication place: Salt Lake City, Utah Title: Digital Orthoimagery Series of Washington Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: raster digital data Other_Citation_Details: 1-meter and 1-foot, Natural Color and NIR-False Color Collateral Data: . USGS 1:24,000 topographic quadrangles . USGS – NHD – National Hydrography Dataset . USGS Topographic maps, 2013 . QIN LiDAR DEM (3 meter) and synthetic stream layer, 2015 . Previous National Wetlands Inventories for the project area . Soil Surveys, All Hydric Soils: Weyerhaeuser soil survey 1976, NRCS soil survey 2013 . QIN WET tables, field photos, and site descriptions, 2016 to 2019, Janice Martin, and Greg Eide Inventory Method: Wetland identification and interpretation was done “heads-up” using ArcMap versions 10.6.1. US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) mapping contractors in Portland, Oregon completed the original aerial photo interpretation and wetland mapping. Primary authors: Nicholas Jones of SWCA Environmental Consulting. 100% Quality Control (QC) during the NWI mapping was provided by Michael Holscher of SWCA Environmental Consulting.
    [Show full text]
  • Araliaceae – Ginseng Family
    ARALIACEAE – GINSENG FAMILY Plant: some herbs (perennial), woody vines, shrubs and trees Stem: usually pithy Root: sometimes with rhizomes Leaves: simple or palmately compound but rarely 2’s or 3’s, often thickened and large, mostly alternate (rarely opposite or whorled); usually with stipules that forms a stem sheath; often with star-shaped hairs Flowers: mostly perfect or unisexual (monoecious or dioecious), regular (actinomorphic); flowers very small, mostly in umbels; sepals 5, often forming small teeth or none, mostly 5(-10) petals; mostly 5(-10) stamens; ovary inferior, 2-5 (10) fused carpels Fruit: berry or drupe, oily Other: mostly tropical and subtropical, a few oranamentals; similar to Apiaceae; Dicotyledons Group Genera: 70+ genera; locally Aralia (spikenard), Hedera (English Ivy), Oplopanax, Panax (ginseng) WARNING – family descriptions are only a layman’s guide and should not be used as definitive Araliaceae (Ginseng Family) – 5 (mostly) sepals and petals (often 5-lobed), often in umbels or compound umbels; leaves simple or more often compound; fruit a berry or drupe Examples of common genera Devil's Walkingstick [Hercules’ Club] Wild Sarsaparilla Aralia spinosa L. Aralia nudicaulis L. Devil's Club [Devil’s Walking Stick; Alaskan Ginseng] Oplopanax horridus (Sm.) Miq. English Ivy Hedera helix L. (Introduced) Dwarf Ginseng Panax trifolius L. ARALIACEAE – GINSENG FAMILY Wild Sarsaparilla; Aralia nudicaulis L. Devil's Walkingstick [Hercules’ Club]; Aralia spinosa L. English Ivy; Hedera helix L. (Introduced) Devil's Club [Devil’s
    [Show full text]
  • Thèse Docteur En Pharmacie
    UNIVERSITE DE PICARDIE JULES VERNE UFR DE PHARMACIE THÈSE pour le diplôme d’état de DOCTEUR EN PHARMACIE Soutenue publiquement le 30 septembre 2016 par Pauline CHALET Le bouleau : une espèce au pollen présentant un risque d’allergie respiratoire très élevé, mais aussi une espèce aux multiples usages pour l’Homme. Thèse dirigée par Madame Déborah CLOSSET-KOPP JURY : Président : Monsieur Guillaume DECOCQ Membres : Madame Elisabeth POPIN Madame Déborah CLOSSET-KOPP Monsieur Sébastien FOURNIER Thèse n° : Remerciements Je remercie tout d’abord Déborah Closset-Kopp qui n’a pas hésité une seule seconde à m’accompagner sur le chemin de la thèse. Sa confiance et sa présence tout au long des recherches et de l’écriture de ce mémoire furent un moteur pour moi. Je remercie Mr Decocq d’avoir accepté de présider la soutenance de ce mémoire. Je remercie les Docteurs Elisabeth Popin et Beatrice Jezraoui, allergologues du CHU d’Amiens qui ont accepté de correspondre par mail avec moi pour répondre à certaines questions. Je remercie également le Dr Popin de m’avoir permis d’assister à des Prick Test dans le service de Pneumologie où je faisais mon stage, et d’avoir accepté de devenir l’un des membres de mon jury. Je remercie mon patron Mr Sébastien Fournier, et les membres de la pharmacie de Cuise-la-Motte, encore actifs ou non, puisqu’ils seront toujours dans mon cœur. Travailler avec eux est un vrai bonheur, et après plusieurs heures passées sur ce mémoire, les rejoindre a toujours été une réelle bouffée d’oxygène. Merci à Mr Fournier de me faire confiance au sein de son officine depuis plusieurs années, et d’avoir accepté d’être l’un des membres de mon jury de thèse.
    [Show full text]