DOCSLIB.ORG

Product Application Reference

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Product Application Reference TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION SECTION NAME PAGE ii 1/ PRODUCT APPLICATION BY PRIME CONTRACTOR x III PRODUCT APPLICATlON BY LAPEC PART NUMBER 60 IV CUSTOMER PART NUMBER VS LAPEC MODEL NUMBER Only95 APPLICATION CODES AG AGRICULTURAL MB MILITARY AI,'lCRAFT CA COMMERCIAL AIRCRAFT M MISSILE CGP COMMERCIAL GROUND POWER MGP MILITARY GROUND POWER D MILITARY DRONES MGV MILITARY GROUND VEHICLE GB GENERAL AVIATION AIRCRAFT MH MILITARY HELICOPTER MT GC GENERAL AVIATlON- MT MILITARY TRAINER COMMUTER AIRCRAFT o OTHER GH GENERAL AVIATIONReferenceHELICOPTER For SECTION I INDEX 1 10 KW GrPower(Malor) (inact) 55 38P Lightning (inactive) 6 100 King Air 5 1000 ..... 34 4 125 Series 700A 17 125 Series 800A 17 402 Turbostar 34 125 -1 000 17 406CS Combat Scout 14 1300 5 412 . 14 1900/1900C 6 412SP 14 19000 ... 6 5 2 5008 34 200,200C,200CT,200T 6 530MG 46 2048 12 55 39 205A 12 55C . Only39 205A-1 12 560 . 34 2058 13 560F 34 206A & 8 (STC) 58 56TC 6 2068 JetRanger 13 580 APU 32 206L 13 206L-1 13, 53 6 206L-3 13 212 .. 13 600 32 214A & 214C 13 65A Sabreliner 51 2148 13 65A Sabreliner APU 51 214ST 13 680E/680F 34 222 . 13 680T/680V 34 2228 14 680W 34 222UT 14 681/6818 34 25 39 685 . 35 250 Series eng test cells 4 690 . 35 250-C34 Test 4 690A 35 27/FH227 26 6908,C 35 6900 35 3 Reference695 . 35 695A,8 35 300 LW Super King Air(for Europe) .. 6 7 300 Super King Air APU 6 300, 350 Super King Air 6 707/720 15 31 39 727 15 340A 52 737 16 3408 For 52 35A . 39 369 (500) A/O/E/H/HE/HM/HS 46 8 369F (530F) / 369FF (530F) 46 36A . 39 840 . 35 11 9 AS-350D (STC) 55 AS-355E/F/F1 (STC) 59 90,C90A,E90 King Air 6 ASALM 43 980 35 AT-3 1 99,99A Airliner AT400 & 400A 3 AT502 4 A AT503 4 ATF3 Test Cell 31 A-12 33 AUSTRALIAN GOVT. FACTORIES 4 AVIATION POWER SUPPLY CO. A100 King Air 7 5 A100-1 Super King Air 7 AYRES 5 A100A King Air 7 A109A 3 B A129 3 A200C, A200CT 8 B100 King Air 8 A40-5 36 B200 Super King Air 9 A6 33 B200,B200C,B200CT,B200T 9 A99 Airliner 8 B52 16 A99A Airliner 8 B99 Airliner 9 BAE JetStream 31 APUOnly4 A9A (inactive) 47 AB 204/205 3 BAE125-800 APU 30 AB 206B 3 BEECH DIV. OF RAYTHEON 5 -12 AB 206BL1 3 Beechjet 400 (STC) 36 AB 212,212ASW 3 Beechjet 400A 9 AB 412 3 Beechjet 400T (USAF T-1A Advanced Cruise Missile 32 Jayhawk) 9 AERITALIA/PARTENAVIA 1 BELL 12 -15 AERO INDUSTRY DEV CENTER 1 BELL AEROSPACE, TEXTRON DIV. 15 AEROCOM 1 BH/HS125 Ser 400A(re-engine) 17 AEROSPATIALE 1 BH/HS125 Ser 600A(re-engine) 17 AG-CATD 53 BK-117 A-1,A-3,A-4 44 AGUSTA 3 BK -117 B-1 44 AH-1J 14 BN-2T Islander 49 AH -1J, - 1T & UH -1N 58 BO-105CB/105CBS 43 AH-1S 14 BO-105D 43 AH-1T 14 BO-105LSA-1 43 AH-1W . 14 BO-105M/105P 44 AIR TRACTOR 3, 4 BO-108 (Prototype #1) 44 ALCM 16 BOEING 15, 16 ALLISON GAS TURBINES 4 BOM34A (inactive) 57 ReferenceBOM34E & F (inactive) 57 AP68TP 600 Viator 1 AP68TP Series 300 Spartacus 1 BREDA NARDI C.A. 17 AOM-91A (154) (inactive) 57 BRITISH AEROSPACE PLC H, 18 Arava 101 37 BTX Trainer 30 Arava 101B 37 Arava 102 37 c Arava 201 37 Arava For202 38 C-119 27 ARKANSAS MODIFICATION CENTER 4 C-21A 39 AS-350B 1 C-26A 27 AS-350C 1 C-29A 17 AS-350D 1 iii I CL-600-2A12 (CL-601) c Challenger 18 J CL-600-2B16 (CL-601-3A)Challen C100 King Air 10 ger 18 C101 19 Classified 48, 51 .J C12A/C 10 CN-235 20 C12D,C12F,RC-12D,RC-12G,RC-12H CN-235-100 20 10 CNATIC (CHINA) 22 C12G 10 Compass Cope 16 J C12J 10 Compass Cope (inactive) 57 C212 (re-engine) 19 Conquest 441 (Conquest II) 22 C212 Special 19 Convair 580 APU 31 C212-100 19 Corsair 425 (Conquest I) 22 C212-200 19 CP-121 Turboprop Tracker 37 C212-CB 19 CZECH. OMNIPOL 23 C212-CC 19 C212-CD, C212-CE 20 o C212-CF 20 C212-DF 20 0500 (Egrett-1 Proof of C99 Airliner 10 Concept)Only33 CAMMACORP 18 Dash 7 & APU (special) 23 CANADAIR 18 Dash 7 APU 23 Caravan I (208 and 208A) 21 DASSAULT 23 Caravan II (406) 21 DC-10 44 CAR CO ELECTRONICS 18 DC-3 Turbo Express CASA 19, 20 (inactive) 58 CASA/IPTN 20 DC-8 44 CBA-123 Vector 26 DC-8 Common Items(P&W JT3D-7) 44 CENTURY AIRCRAFT 20 DC-8, 20 kva Gen CESSNA DIV. OF GENERAL Sys-brushless 45 DYNAMICS 21 DC-8, 30 kva Gen CESSNA DIV. OF GENERAL Sys-brushless 45 DYNAMICS 22 DC-8-60, 30 kva Gen Sys 45 Cessna 206 & 207 (re-engine) 55 DC-9 45 Cessna 337 Skymaster 56 DC8-70 Series. 18 Cessna 421 Turbo 51 DE HAVILLAND 23-25 CGTM 22 Deep Star (inactive) 59 CH47 3, 16 DH-125 Series 1A (re-engine) 17 Cheyenne 400 49 DH-125 Series 3A (re-engine) 18 Cheyenne I 49 DH-125 Series Cheyenne II Reference49 3A/RA(re-engine) 18 Cheyenne I II 50 DHC-8-100 23 Cheyenne IlIA 50 DHC-8-300 24 Citation I (500) 21 Diamond IA Beechjet 10 Citation II (550) 21 Diamond II (MU300) (inactive) 46 Citation III (650) 21 00-128-6 25 Citation III (650) APU 21 00-228-100/-200 25 CitationForS/II 21 00-228-100/-200 (licensed) 36 Citation UNFO (T-47A) 21 00-228:200 Special 25 Citation V 22 00-2802 25 CL -600 -1 A11 (CL -600) DO-ATT 25 Challenger 18 0028 54 iv o FH1100 36 FIAT 30 DORNIER 25 Firefly Pumper (inactive) 5 DORNIER COMPOSITE AIRCRAFT 25 FJ44 engine dev 59 DORNIER/FAA 26 FMC CORPORATION 30 Duke 60/A60/B60 10 FOKKER 30 Fouga Magistra 38 E FRAKES 30 FUJI HEAVY EQUIPMENT 30 E-9A 24 FWC-12D (Israel) 11 EMB 110/P1/P2 Bandeirante 26 EMB 120 Brasilia 26 G EMB 120 Brasilia APU 26 EMB 121 A (X I NGU -1) 26 GAF Hawk 125 36 EMB 121B (XINGU-3) 26 GARRETT CORP / AIRESEARCH EMB 312 Tucano (T-27) 26 AVIA 30, 31 EMBRAER 26 GARRETT CORP / TURBINE EMBRAER/FAMA 26 ENGINE 31, 32 Emergency Gen Sys (Saturn) MG 55 GENERAL DYNAMICS / CONVAIR 32 GENERAL DYNAMICS / OnlyFORT Erint -1 42 Excal. 800 & Swearingen 800 27 WORTH 32 Excalibur 500 . 27 Goose 46 GREAT LAKES AIRCRAFT 33 F GROB TFE 33 GRUMMAN AEROSPACE F.1300 Jet Squalus CORPORATION 33 (Prototype) 50 GULFSTREAM AERO GULFSTREAM F-15 IDG System 45 DIV 33 F-15 STOL/SMTD 45 GULFSTREAM AEROSPACE CORP. 34 F-15E lOG System 45 Gulfstream II 34 F-16 33 GZ-22 Airship 42 F-16N 33 F109 Engine Test 31 H F27 (Friendship) 30 F4 Rudder Pedal Adjust Sys 45 HAMILTON AIRCRAFT 35 F406 (Cessna Caravan II) 51 HAMILTON STANDARD 36 F4K Phantom Jet 45 HANGAR ONE 36 F5/T38 48 HAWK INDUSTRIES . 36 F5E,F 48 HEllO 36 F90-1 King Air 11 HELITEC (AVIATION ReferenceSPECIAL TIES) 36 FAADS-PPU 59 FAIRCHILD AIRCRAFT HF320 44 CORPORATION 26, 27, 29 HILLER AVIATION 36 FAIRCHILD/REPUBLIC 30 HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LTD. 36, 37 Falcon 10 23 HS125-400A 31 Falcon 10 APU 37, 46 HS125-700 APU 4, 31 Falcon 20 Test Bed 31 HTT-34 Trainer 37 FalconFor200 23 HU-25A 23 FALCON JET CORPORATION 30 HU-25A APU 30 Fantrainer 400 51 Hustler 500 (inactive) 34 Fantrainer 600 51 Hydrofoil Patrol Boat 33 v LORAL SYSTEMS GROUP, AIRSHIP I DIV 42 LTV MISSILES DIVISION 42 I.M.P. GROUP LTD. 37 I IA-63 . 26 M J IDF 1 INNOTECH AVIATION 37 M113 APU (Korea) 32 ISRAEL AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIES 37, 38 M41 Tank (inactive) 56 J M48 Tank (inactive) 56 J M577 (inactive) 57 M60 Tank (inactive) 57 JETCRAFT, INC. 38 M88 Tank (inactive) 57 JetStar 731 & APU 31 Marquise (stretch JetStar I & APU 39 version) (inact) 46 JetStar II & APU 40 MARSH AVIATION 42, 43 Jetstream 41 18 MARTIN MAR IETTA 43 Jetstream III 20 MAULE AIR INC. 43 Jetstream Model 3101 18 MBB 43, 44 Jetstream Model 3201 18 MBB/KAWASAKI 44 McDONNELL DOUGLAS Only 44-46 K McKINNON 46 MDH 369 (500) D/E/HE/HM/HS KC 135 16 (STC) 59 KC 97 (E,F,G) 16 Merlin IIA - SA26-T 27 Merlin lIB - SA26-AT 27 L Merlin III - SA226-T 27 Merlin 111/23,23-2 SA227-TT 27 L-100 (C130) 40 Merlin IlIA - SA226-T 27 L-1011-100 Cargo Door Act Merlin IIIB - SA226-T (B) 28 Sys 40 Merlin IIIC/41,41-2SA227-TT 28 L-1011-100 Galley Lift Sys 40 Merlin 1110 SA227-PP 28 L-1011-100 lOG System 41 Merlin IV SA226-AT 28 L-1011-100 Load Relieving Merlin IVA SA226-AT 28 Sys 41 Merlin IVC SA227-AT 28 L-1011-100 Trim Actuator 41 Merlin IVD SA227-PT L-1011-500 Cargo Door Act (inactive) 29 Sys 41 Metro II, IIA SA226-TC 29 L-1011-500 lOG System 42 Metro III SA227-AC 29 L-1011-500 Load Relieving Metro IlIA SA227-PC 29 Sys 42 Metro SA226-T 29 ReferenceMIDCOAST AVIATION 46 L-1011-500 Trim Actuator 42 L-8 22 MIEI APU 32 L-8 & K-8 Trainer 47 MITSUBISHI 46, 47 L80-TP 58 MK30 (MASWT) 48 LAVI 38 Mohawk 298 30 Lear Fan 2100 (inactive) 39 MOM34D (inactive) 57 LEAR FAN, LTD.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cruise Missiles Post World War II
    Cruise missiles milestones MILE post STONES World War II Dr Carlo Kopp THE BASIC TECHNOLOGY AND OPERATIONAL CONCEPT OF MODERN CRUISE MISSILES EMERGED DURING THE LATE 1960S, at the peak of the Cold War era. This type of weapon was exemplified by the RGM-109 Tomahawk series, the AGM-86C/D CALCM, the AGM-158 JASSM, and the Russian Kh-55SM Granat. Much less known is the generation of cruise missile technology that supplanted the 1940s era FZG-76/V-1 and its Russian and American clone variants. A good number of the former Soviet weapons of this generation remain in use, some still in production. The aim of all cruise missile designs is to provide a weapon that can strike at a target while not exposing the launch platform to attack by enemy defences, whether the launch platform is an aircraft, surface warship, submarine or ground vehicle. Key parameters in the design of any cruise missile are its standoff range, its accuracy and its survivability against target defences. Increasing standoff range reduces risk to the launch platform while increasing accuracy and survivability reduces the number of launches required to achieve desired effect. The economics of bombardment are simple: the more expensive the weapon employed, the smaller the war stock available for combat at any time, and the longer it takes to replenish this war stock once expended. Northrop SM-62 Snark strategic cruise missile. This enormous 50,000 lb plus GLCM was built to directly attack the Soviet Union from US basing. It introduced the fi rst stellar-inertial guidance system in a cruise missile.
    [Show full text]
  • GAO WEAPONS ACQUISITION Precision Guided Munitions In
    United States General Accounting Office GAO Report to Congressional Committees June 1995 WEAPONS ACQUISITION Precision Guided Munitions in Inventory, Production, and Development GAO/NSIAD-95-95 United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 National Security and International Affairs Division B-260458 June 23, 1995 Congressional Committees The military services are spending billions of dollars to acquire new and improved munitions whose technical sophistication allows guidance corrections during their flight to the target. These weapons are referred to as precision guided munitions (PGM). We reviewed Air Force, Navy, and Army munitions programs in inventory, production, and development that could be defined as using precision guidance to attack surface targets.1 Our objectives were to determine (1) the costs and quantities planned for the PGMs, (2) the services rationale for initiating PGM development programs, (3) options available to the services to attack surface targets with PGMs, and (4) the extent to which the services are jointly developing and procuring PGMs. We conducted this work under our basic legislative responsibilities and plan to use this baseline report in planning future work on Defense-wide issues affecting the acquisition and effectiveness of PGMs. We are addressing the report to you because we believe it will be of interest to your committees. PGMs employ various guidance methods to enhance the probability of Background hitting the target. These include target location information from a human designator, global positioning system (GPS) satellites, an inertial navigation system, a terminal seeker on the munition, or a combination of these sources. Since PGMs can correct errors in flight, the services expect to need fewer rounds to achieve the same or higher probabilities of kill as unguided weapons.
    [Show full text]
  • Design of a Light Business Jet Family David C
    Design of a Light Business Jet Family David C. Alman Andrew R. M. Hoeft Terry H. Ma AIAA : 498858 AIAA : 494351 AIAA : 820228 Cameron B. McMillan Jagadeesh Movva Christopher L. Rolince AIAA : 486025 AIAA : 738175 AIAA : 808866 I. Acknowledgements We would like to thank Mr. Carl Johnson, Dr. Neil Weston, and the numerous Georgia Tech faculty and students who have assisted in our personal and aerospace education, and this project specifically. In addition, the authors would like to individually thank the following: David C. Alman: My entire family, but in particular LCDR Allen E. Alman, USNR (BSAE Purdue ’49) and father James D. Alman (BSAE Boston University ’87) for instilling in me a love for aircraft, and Karrin B. Alman for being a wonderful mother and reading to me as a child. I’d also like to thank my friends, including brother Mark T. Alman, who have provided advice, laughs, and made life more fun. Also, I am forever indebted to Roe and Penny Stamps and the Stamps President’s Scholarship Program for allowing me to attend Georgia Tech and to the Georgia Tech Research Institute for providing me with incredible opportunities to learn and grow as an engineer. Lastly, I’d like to thank the countless mentors who have believed in me, helped me learn, and Page i provided the advice that has helped form who I am today. Andrew R. M. Hoeft: As with every undertaking in my life, my involvement on this project would not have been possible without the tireless support of my family and friends.
    [Show full text]
  • CAA - Airworthiness Approved Organisations
    CAA - Airworthiness Approved Organisations Category BCAR Name British Balloon and Airship Club Limited (DAI/8298/74) (GA) Address Cushy DingleWatery LaneLlanishen Reference Number DAI/8298/74 Category BCAR Chepstow Website www.bbac.org Regional Office NP16 6QT Approval Date 26 FEBRUARY 2001 Organisational Data Exposition AW\Exposition\BCAR A8-15 BBAC-TC-134 ISSUE 02 REVISION 00 02 NOVEMBER 2017 Name Lindstrand Technologies Ltd (AD/1935/05) Address Factory 2Maesbury Road Reference Number AD/1935/05 Category BCAR Oswestry Website Shropshire Regional Office SY10 8GA Approval Date Organisational Data Category BCAR A5-1 Name Deltair Aerospace Limited (TRA) (GA) (A5-1) Address 17 Aston Road, Reference Number Category BCAR A5-1 Waterlooville Website http://www.deltair- aerospace.co.uk/contact Hampshire Regional Office PO7 7XG United Kingdom Approval Date Organisational Data 30 July 2021 Page 1 of 82 Name Acro Aeronautical Services (TRA)(GA) (A5-1) Address Rossmore38 Manor Park Avenue Reference Number Category BCAR A5-1 Princes Risborough Website Buckinghamshire Regional Office HP27 9AS Approval Date Organisational Data Name British Gliding Association (TRA) (GA) (A5-1) Address 8 Merus Court,Meridian Business Reference Number Park Category BCAR A5-1 Leicester Website Leicestershire Regional Office LE19 1RJ Approval Date Organisational Data Name Shipping and Airlines (TRA) (GA) (A5-1) Address Hangar 513,Biggin Hill Airport, Reference Number Category BCAR A5-1 Westerham Website Kent Regional Office TN16 3BN Approval Date Organisational Data Name
    [Show full text]
  • ISSEK HSE) Role of Big Data Augmented Horizon Scanning in Strategic and Marketing Analytics
    National Research University Higher School of Economics Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge Big Data Augmented Horizon Scanning: Combination of Quantitative and Qualitative Methods for Strategic and Marketing Analytics [email protected] [email protected] XIX April International Academic Conference on Economic and Social Development Moscow, 11 April 2018 Outline - Role of artificial intelligence and big data in modern analytics - System of Intelligent Foresight Analytics iFORA - Combined quantitative and qualitative analysis methodology and software solutions - Use cases - Conclusion and discussion 2 Growing interest in Artificial Intelligence, Big Data and Machine Learning International analytical reports & news feed 12000 10000 8000 Artificial Intelligence 6000 Big Data Machine Learning 4000 2000 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Russian analytical reports & news feed 800 700 600 500 Artificial Intelligence 400 Big Data 300 Machine Learning 200 100 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 3 Source: System of Intelligent Foresight Analytics iFORA™ (ISSEK HSE) Role of Big Data Augmented Horizon Scanning in Strategic and Marketing Analytics AI-related tasks Tracking latest and challenges trends, technologies, drivers, barriers Market forecasting Trend analysis Understanding S&T modern skills and Instruments for Customers Market Intelligence competences analysis feedback knowledge discovery HR policy Vacancy Feedback mining
    [Show full text]
  • The Aircraft Propulsion the Aircraft Propulsion
    THE AIRCRAFT PROPULSION Aircraft propulsion Contact: Ing. Miroslav Šplíchal, Ph.D. [email protected] Office: A1/0427 Aircraft propulsion Organization of the course Topics of the lectures: 1. History of AE, basic of thermodynamic of heat engines, 2-stroke and 4-stroke cycle 2. Basic parameters of piston engines, types of piston engines 3. Design of piston engines, crank mechanism, 4. Design of piston engines - auxiliary systems of piston engines, 5. Performance characteristics increase performance, propeller. 6. Turbine engines, introduction, input system, centrifugal compressor. 7. Turbine engines - axial compressor, combustion chamber. 8. Turbine engines – turbine, nozzles. 9. Turbine engines - increasing performance, construction of gas turbine engines, 10. Turbine engines - auxiliary systems, fuel-control system. 11. Turboprop engines, gearboxes, performance. 12. Maintenance of turbine engines 13. Ramjet engines and Rocket engines Aircraft propulsion Organization of the course Topics of the seminars: 1. Basic parameters of piston engine + presentation (1-7)- 3.10.2017 2. Parameters of centrifugal flow compressor + presentation(8-14) - 17.10.2017 3. Loading of turbine blade + presentation (15-21)- 31.10.2017 4. Jet engine cycle + presentation (22-28) - 14.11.2017 5. Presentation alternative date Seminar work: Aircraft engines presentation A short PowerPoint presentation, aprox. 10 minutes long. Content of presentation: - a brief history of the engine - the main innovation introduced by engine - engine drawing / cross-section -
    [Show full text]
  • ATP® Libraries Catalog
    2 ATP® Libraries Catalog Revision Date May 24 2016 ATP 101 South Hill Drive Brisbane, CA 94005 (+1) 415-330-9500 www.atp.com ATP® Policies and Legal www.atp.com/policy © Copyright 2016, ATP. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of ATP. The information in this catalog is subject to change without notice.ATP, ATP Knowledge, ATP Aviation Hub, HubConnect, NavigatorV, and their respective logos, are among the registered trademarks or trademarks of ATP. All third-party trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners and ATP asserts no ownership rights to these items. iPad and iPhone are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. All original authorship of ATP is protected under U.S. and foreign copyrights and is subject to written license agreements between ATP and its subscribers. Visit www.atp.com/policy for more information ATP Customer Support Please visit www.atp.com/support for customer support information ATP® Libraries Catalog – Revision Date: May 24 2016 3 CONTENTS CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 REGULATORY LIBRARIES .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NSIAD-95-95 Weapons Acquisition: Precision Guided Munitions
    United States General Accounting Offhe -GAO Report to Congressional Committees June 1996 GAO/NSL4D-95-96 .-- _.-- United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 National Security and International Affairs Division B-260458 June 23,1995 Congressional Committees The military services are spending billions of dollars to acquire new and improved munitions whose technical sophistication allows guidance corrections during their flight to the target. These weapons are referred to as precision guided munitions (PGM). We reviewed Air Force, Navy, and Army munitions programs in inventory, production, and development that could be defined as using precision guidance to attack surface targets.’ Our objectives were to determine (1) the costs and quantities planned for the PGMS, (2) the services rationale for initiating PGM development programs, (3) options available to the services to attack surface targets with PGMs, and (4) the extent to which the services are jointly developing and procuring PGMS. We conducted this work under our basic legislative responsibilities and plan to use this baseline report in planning future work on Defense-wide issues affecting the acquisition and effectiveness of PGMS. We are addressing the report to you because we believe it will be of interest to your committees. -ll.._-~ PGMS employ various guidance methods to enhance the probability of Background hitting the target. These include target location information from a human designator, global positioning system (GPS) satellites, an inertial navigation system, a terminal seeker on the munition, or a combination of these sources. Since PGMs can correct errors in flight, the services expect to need fewer rounds to achieve the same or higher probabilities of kill as unguided weapons, Additionally, the services expect PGM accuracy and lethality to reduce the number of launch platforms and soldiers required to counter specific targets.
    [Show full text]
  • Aip Supplement 012/2019 United Kingdom
    AIP SUPPLEMENT 012/2019 UNITED KINGDOM Date Of Publication 14 Mar 2019 UK Aeronautical Information Services Notes NATS Swanwick (a) All times are UTC. Room 3115 (b) References are to the UK AIP. Sopwith Way (c) Information, where applicable, Southampton SO31 7AY [email protected] should also be used to amend http://www.ais.org.uk appropriate charts. 07469-441832 (Content - DfT/Aviation Policy Division) 0191-203 2329 (Distribution - Communisis UK) LONDON HEATHROW, LONDON GATWICK AND LONDON STANSTED AIRPORTS NOISE RESTRICTIONS NOTICE 2019 (Published on behalf of the Department for Transport) Whereas: a) By virtue of the Civil Aviation (Designation of Aerodromes) Order 1981(a) Heathrow Airport - London, Gatwick Airport - London and Stansted Airport - London (‘the London Airports’) are designated aerodromes for the purposes of Section 78 of the Civil Aviation Act 1982 (‘the Act’)(b); b) Pursuant to the powers set out in section 78 of the Act, the Secretary of State considers it appropriate, for the purpose of avoiding, limiting or mitigating the effect of noise and vibration connected with the taking-off or landing of aircraft at the London Airports, to prohibit aircraft of specified descriptions from taking off or landing and to limit the number of occasions on which other aircraft may take off or land at those aerodromes during periods specified in this Notice throughout the period specified as the summer season 2019 in this Notice; c) For the purposes of Section 78(4)(a) of the Act, the circumstances under which a particular occasion or series of occasions on which aircraft take off or land at the London Airports will be disregarded for the purposes of this Notice are specified in paragraph 11 of this Notice.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimizing Selection of Tomahawk Cruise Missiles
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1998-03 Optimizing selection of Tomahawk Cruise Missiles Kuykendall, Scott D. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/32721 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California THESIS OPTIMIZING SELECTION OF TOMAHAWK CRmSE MISSILES by Scott D. Kuykendall March, 1998 Thesis Advisor: Richard E. Rosenthal Second Reader: George W. Conner r • Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DTIC QUALITY INSPECTED--- a REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED March 1998 Master's Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS OPTIMIZING SELECTION OF TOMAHAWK CRUISE MISSILES 6. AUTHOR(S) Kuykendall, Scott D. 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) ANDADDRESS(ES) REPORT NUMBER Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, CA 93943-5000 9. SPONSORING I MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING I MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Test and Evaluation Trends and Costs for Aircraft and Guided Weapons
    CHILD POLICY This PDF document was made available CIVIL JUSTICE from www.rand.org as a public service of EDUCATION the RAND Corporation. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE Jump down to document6 INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS NATIONAL SECURITY The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit POPULATION AND AGING research organization providing PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY objective analysis and effective SUBSTANCE ABUSE solutions that address the challenges TERRORISM AND facing the public and private sectors HOMELAND SECURITY TRANSPORTATION AND around the world. INFRASTRUCTURE Support RAND Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Project AIR FORCE View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non- commercial use only. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Test and Evaluation Trends and Costs for Aircraft and Guided Weapons Bernard Fox, Michael Boito, John C.Graser, Obaid Younossi Prepared for the United States Air Force Approved for public release, distribution unlimited The research reported here was sponsored by the United States Air Force under Contract F49642-01-C-0003.
    [Show full text]
  • Tomahawk Deconfliction: an Exercise in System Engineering
    TOMAHAWK DECONFLICTION Tomahawk Deconfliction: An Exercise in System Engineering Ann F. Pollack, Robert C. Ferguson, and Andreas K. Chrysostomou I mprovements to the navigational and timing accuracy of the Tomahawk Block III missile resulted in the need to deconflict missiles, that is, to prevent missile-to-missile interference during flight. The Applied Physics Laboratory identified the potential risks resulting from the missile’s increased accuracy, quantified the resulting probability of collision, and identified a deconfliction solution. This effort required a broad system knowledge of Tomahawk and its supporting systems. Because so many different factors influence deconfliction—from Global Positioning System accuracy to overall engine performance—the solution must continue to be evaluated as the weapon system evolves. The Laboratory continues to educate users about deconfliction, to monitor its effective use, and to analyze the potential effects on deconfliction of weapon system developments. This ongoing system engineering effort assures the continued effective- ness of the Tomahawk deconfliction solution. (Keywords: Deconfliction, Fratricide, Tomahawk.) INTRODUCTION The Tomahawk Block III missile was first used op- understanding of all Tomahawk system components, erationally in Bosnia on 10 September 1995. The from mission planning to the weapon control system to onboard software automatically determined a small the missile itself. As the Tomahawk system evolves, route offset for each missile. These offsets deconflicted APL continues to evaluate the deconfliction solution the missiles, preventing missile-to-missile interference against new developments to assure that it continues during flight. Without automatic deconfliction, some of to protect against missile interference. these missiles probably would not have reached their The question of missile deconfliction was raised targets.
    [Show full text]