DOCSLIB.ORG

Design of a Light Business Jet Family David C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Design of a Light Business Jet Family David C Design of a Light Business Jet Family David C. Alman Andrew R. M. Hoeft Terry H. Ma AIAA : 498858 AIAA : 494351 AIAA : 820228 Cameron B. McMillan Jagadeesh Movva Christopher L. Rolince AIAA : 486025 AIAA : 738175 AIAA : 808866 I. Acknowledgements We would like to thank Mr. Carl Johnson, Dr. Neil Weston, and the numerous Georgia Tech faculty and students who have assisted in our personal and aerospace education, and this project specifically. In addition, the authors would like to individually thank the following: David C. Alman: My entire family, but in particular LCDR Allen E. Alman, USNR (BSAE Purdue ’49) and father James D. Alman (BSAE Boston University ’87) for instilling in me a love for aircraft, and Karrin B. Alman for being a wonderful mother and reading to me as a child. I’d also like to thank my friends, including brother Mark T. Alman, who have provided advice, laughs, and made life more fun. Also, I am forever indebted to Roe and Penny Stamps and the Stamps President’s Scholarship Program for allowing me to attend Georgia Tech and to the Georgia Tech Research Institute for providing me with incredible opportunities to learn and grow as an engineer. Lastly, I’d like to thank the countless mentors who have believed in me, helped me learn, and Page i provided the advice that has helped form who I am today. Andrew R. M. Hoeft: As with every undertaking in my life, my involvement on this project would not have been possible without the tireless support of my family and friends. I thank my mother, Sue Ellen, for leading me through 23 years of life’s great challenges with enthusiasm, and my stepfather, Martice, for helping me realize that I cannot know everything - and that’s okay. I am especially grateful for my sister and brother-in-law, Maria and Cory: without them, I would not have the privilege of attending Georgia Tech. And finally, I thank my longtime mentor and friend, Dr. Kevin Eveker, for validating my interest in aerospace engineering as a profession and providing uncountable hours of advice. Terry H. Ma: I would like to thank my parents for teaching me early on the work ethics and determination required to face and overcome the most daunting obstacles. Their endless support for me has allowed me to attend Georgia Tech to further my education and passion for aviation and engineering. In addition, I would like to thank the the faculty at Georgia Tech who has equipped me with the skills needed to become successful, as well as the numerous talented students whom I have had the pleasure of working along side. In particular, my close friend and colleague, Kayla W. has been there for me personally and professionally throughout my 5 year career as an undergraduate student at Georgia Tech. Cameron B. McMillan My parents, Steve and Briggs McMillan, who have supported me on every step of my educational journey. My brother, Andrew McMillan, for always grounding me. I would especially like to thank Dr. Brian German and the many researchers of the Aerospace Systems Design Lab at Georgia Tech for mentoring me throughout my undergraduate career. Jagadeesh Movva My caring family, including my parents Ramesh and Kavitha Movva as well as my brother Vikash Movva. Without their support to help me pursue my dreams, I would not be where I am today. I am thankful for the numerous mentors I have had including Mr. Richard Sims and Mr. Jason Weinberger. I would also like to thank my advisor, Prof. Marilyn Smith on her guidance and mentorship. Christopher L. Rolince: My incredibly supporting family, specifically my grandfather, Wayne Page ii L. Dolan, and father, Daniel J. Rolince for fostering a love and passion for aviation, and mother Christine M. Rolince for supporting me throughout the rigors of Georgia Tech. Additionally, thanks to the United States Navy for giving me the opportunity to both study at Georgia Tech and continue my passion for flying. Additionally, Alyssa Bushhouse (Virginia Tech), Natalie Larkins (Georgia Tech) and Alex Carroll (Georgia Tech) for their assistance with our team logo design and model renderings. Page iii II. Executive Summary The demand for light business jets fell significantly during and after the 2009 recession. Man- ufacturers operating in this market have remained understandably cautious about introducing new aircraft or technology. However, new investments in infrastructure coupled with global economic growth in recent years present a high-return opportunity for new entries into the light business jet market segment. This technical proposal outlines the design and development of a two-member light business jet aircraft family with capacities of six and eight passengers. The goal of this project was to introduce new technology and increased capability with a low operating cost in order to meet current and future demands. The eight-passenger variant was used as the primary design driver given its higher payload and resulting performance impact. Multiple Class I concepts were considered; these included conventional and unconventional component configurations across a variety of weight classes. Ultimately, a canard-equipped aircraft with a maximum gross takeoff weight of roughly 17,000 lbs was selected. Rigorous technical analysis was performed to validate this design choice using several commercial software packages for computational fluid dynamics, finite element analysis, trade-study-guided optimization, and computer-aided design and simulation. In addition, several custom software applications were developed in order to optimize the wing and canard size, loca- tion, and stability characteristics. Due to the highly-coupled nature of the design, all analyses were extensively iterated. To guarantee the creation of a feasible light business jet family, both the six- and eight-passenger variants were expected to share at least 70% parts commonality. Consequently, the six-passenger aircraft demanded extensive design consideration to meet this requirement effectively. Ultimately, a simple fuselage plug, six feet in length, was chosen as main differentiating element between the two aircraft. While this choice complicated the center of gravity and stability characteristics to achieve the desired performance, it significantly reduced the overall design complexity and created a net reduction in development and acquisition costs. Since the wing and canard were sized to meet the eight-person requirements, they are non-optimal for the six-person design mission. This Page iv does, however, allow the six-person to have a greater range and reduced cost due to increased parts commonality and shared tooling. Performance and cost analyses validated this decision. Financially, these clean-sheet aircraft represent a unique and lucrative opportunity for a new or existing manufacturer in the light business jet market. Based on extensive cost modeling and analysis, the current-year sale price of the eight-passenger aircraft was found to be US $7.5 million while the current-year sale price of the six-person variant was found to be US $6.5 million. These prices include a 15% profit margin for the manufacturer at a production rate of 6 aircraft per month. The emphasis on feasibility and technology readiness throughout the design process results in high confidence that these aircraft would meet a target entry-into-service date of 2020 and 2022 for the six- and eight-passenger aircraft, respectively. In light of the growing market potential and high financial upside, this light business jet aircraft family shows substantial promise and constitutes a worthy business venture. Through the strategic use of advanced yet proven technologies, commercial-off-the-shelf subsystems, and modern manu- facturing practices, the HAMMMR Designs family of aircraft successfully delivers a sophisticated aesthetic while accomplishing an impressive performance envelope and guaranteeing maximum value for both customers and shareholders. Page v Figure 1: Scaled Three-View Image of the HAMMMR Designs H-800 Page vi Contents I Acknowledgements i II Executive Summary iv III Requirements 1 IV Business Jet Market Analysis 2 V Class I Configuration Selections 4 A Fuselage Configuration . 5 B Wing Configuration . 6 C Landing Gear Configuration . 6 D Engine Type . 7 E Engine Location . 7 F Engine Number . 8 G Tail Configuration . 9 H Configuration Results . 10 VI Aircraft Weight and Sizing 11 A Mission Analysis . 11 B Constraint Sizing . 12 C Weight Sizing . 14 D Aircraft Performance . 18 VII Wing and Canard Design 20 A Process Overview . 20 B Center of Gravity Analysis . 20 C Wing Design . 24 D Canard Design and Placement . 31 E Configuration Optimizer . 35 VIII Stability and Control System Design 40 A Longitudinal Motion . 41 B Lateral Motion . 43 IX Materials Selection and Structural Configuration 45 A Fuselage Design and Structural Analysis . 46 B Wing Structural Design and Analysis . 50 C Design of Vertical Tail and Canard Structure . 54 D Maneuvering Envelop and V-N Diagram . 55 X Landing Gear Placement and Design 58 XI Cabin Design 61 Page vii XII Range 66 XIII Subsystem Selections 69 A Power . 69 B Avionics . 70 C Safety . 72 XIV Alternative Variants 76 A Cargo Variant . 76 B Electronic/Signals Intelligence . 76 XV Cost Estimation 77 A Development and Production Cost . 77 B Operating Cost . 79 XVI Conclusion 82 XVII Appendix 84 List of Figures 1 Scaled Three-View Image of the HAMMMR Designs H-800 . vi 2 FAA Data on Market Growth . 2 3 Standard T-Tail, Cruciform Tail, and V-Tail Configurations . 9 4 Selected Component Configuration . 10 5 NBAA IFR Range Profile . 11 6 Energy based constraint sizing . 13 7 Historical Aircraft Weight Regression (pictures not to scale) . 15 8 Trade Study of Cruise Conditions Effect on Gross Weight . 16 9 Trade Study of Cruise Conditions Effect on Design Mission Block Time . 17 10 FLOPS Output Drag Polar at Mach 0.8, 43k ft .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Development of Next Generation Civilian Aircraft
    International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 11, Issue 12, December-2020 293 ISSN 2229-5518 Development of Next Generation Civilian Aircraft H Sai Manish Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal, Karnataka, India Abstract Designing a NEXT GENERATION FLYING VEHICLE & its JET ENGINE for commercial air transportation civil aviation Service. Implementation of Innovation in Future Aviation & Aerospace. In the ever-changing dynamics of the world of airspace and technology constant Research and Development is required to adapt to meet the requirement of the passengers. This study aims to develop a subsonic passenger aircraft which is designed in a way to make airline travel economical and affordable to everyone. The design and development of this study aims to i) to reduce the various forces acted on the aircraft thereby reducing the fuel consumption, ii) to utilise proper set of materials and composites to reduce the aircraft weight and iii) proper implementation of Engineering Design techniques. This assessment considers the feasibility of the technology and development efforts, as well as their potential commercial prospects given the anticipated market and current regulatory regime. Keywords Aircraft, Drag reduction, Engine, Fuselage, Manufacture, Weight reduction, Wings Introduction Subsonic airlines have been IJSERthe norm now almost reaching speeds of Mach 0.80, with this into consideration all the commercial passenger airlines have adapted to design and implement aircraft to subsonic speeds. Although high speeds are usually desirable in an aircraft, supersonic flight requires much bigger engines, higher fuel consumption and more advanced materials than subsonic flight. A subsonic type therefore costs far less than the equivalent supersonic design, has greater range and causes less harm to the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Business & Commercial Aviation
    BUSINESS & COMMERCIAL AVIATION LEONARDO AW609 PERFORMANCE PLATEAUS OCEANIC APRIL 2020 $10.00 AviationWeek.com/BCA Business & Commercial Aviation AIRCRAFT UPDATE Leonardo AW609 Bringing tiltrotor technology to civil aviation FUEL PLANNING ALSO IN THIS ISSUE Part 91 Department Inspections Is It Airworthy? Oceanic Fuel Planning Who Says It’s Ready? APRIL 2020 VOL. 116 NO. 4 Performance Plateaus Digital Edition Copyright Notice The content contained in this digital edition (“Digital Material”), as well as its selection and arrangement, is owned by Informa. and its affiliated companies, licensors, and suppliers, and is protected by their respective copyright, trademark and other proprietary rights. Upon payment of the subscription price, if applicable, you are hereby authorized to view, download, copy, and print Digital Material solely for your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that by doing any of the foregoing, you acknowledge that (i) you do not and will not acquire any ownership rights of any kind in the Digital Material or any portion thereof, (ii) you must preserve all copyright and other proprietary notices included in any downloaded Digital Material, and (iii) you must comply in all respects with the use restrictions set forth below and in the Informa Privacy Policy and the Informa Terms of Use (the “Use Restrictions”), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Any use not in accordance with, and any failure to comply fully with, the Use Restrictions is expressly prohibited by law, and may result in severe civil and criminal penalties. Violators will be prosecuted to the maximum possible extent. You may not modify, publish, license, transmit (including by way of email, facsimile or other electronic means), transfer, sell, reproduce (including by copying or posting on any network computer), create derivative works from, display, store, or in any way exploit, broadcast, disseminate or distribute, in any format or media of any kind, any of the Digital Material, in whole or in part, without the express prior written consent of Informa.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Opportunities in Aircraft Cabin Conversion and Refurbishing
    Business Opportunities in Aircraft Cabin Conversion and Refurbishing Mihaela F. Niţă1 and Dieter Scholz2 Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Berliner Tor 9, 20099 Hamburg, Germany This paper identifies several meaningful business opportunity cases in the area of aircraft cabin conversion and refurbishing and predicts the market volume and the world distribution for each of them: 1.) international cabins, 2.) domestic cabins, 3.) aircraft on operating lease, 4.) freighter conversions and 5.) VIP completions. This implies the determination of cabin modification/conversion scenarios, along with their duration and frequency. Factors driving the cabin conversion and refurbishing are identified. Several aircraft databases, containing the current world feet as well as the forecasted fleet for the next years, are analyzed. The results are obtained by creating a program able to read and analyze the gathered data. It is shown that about 38000 cabin redesigns will be undertaken within the next 20 years. About 2500 conversions from jetliners into freighters and 25000 cabin modifications at VIP standards will emerge on the market. The North American and European markets will keep providing good business opportunities in this area. The Asian market, however, is growing fast, and its very strong influence on demand puts it in the front rank for the next 20 years. Nomenclature agescenario_limit = aircraft age for which the refurbishing is no longer planned by the operator. dateaircraft_delivery = date of the aircraft first delivery datemodification
    [Show full text]
  • CAA - Airworthiness Approved Organisations
    CAA - Airworthiness Approved Organisations Category BCAR Name British Balloon and Airship Club Limited (DAI/8298/74) (GA) Address Cushy DingleWatery LaneLlanishen Reference Number DAI/8298/74 Category BCAR Chepstow Website www.bbac.org Regional Office NP16 6QT Approval Date 26 FEBRUARY 2001 Organisational Data Exposition AW\Exposition\BCAR A8-15 BBAC-TC-134 ISSUE 02 REVISION 00 02 NOVEMBER 2017 Name Lindstrand Technologies Ltd (AD/1935/05) Address Factory 2Maesbury Road Reference Number AD/1935/05 Category BCAR Oswestry Website Shropshire Regional Office SY10 8GA Approval Date Organisational Data Category BCAR A5-1 Name Deltair Aerospace Limited (TRA) (GA) (A5-1) Address 17 Aston Road, Reference Number Category BCAR A5-1 Waterlooville Website http://www.deltair- aerospace.co.uk/contact Hampshire Regional Office PO7 7XG United Kingdom Approval Date Organisational Data 30 July 2021 Page 1 of 82 Name Acro Aeronautical Services (TRA)(GA) (A5-1) Address Rossmore38 Manor Park Avenue Reference Number Category BCAR A5-1 Princes Risborough Website Buckinghamshire Regional Office HP27 9AS Approval Date Organisational Data Name British Gliding Association (TRA) (GA) (A5-1) Address 8 Merus Court,Meridian Business Reference Number Park Category BCAR A5-1 Leicester Website Leicestershire Regional Office LE19 1RJ Approval Date Organisational Data Name Shipping and Airlines (TRA) (GA) (A5-1) Address Hangar 513,Biggin Hill Airport, Reference Number Category BCAR A5-1 Westerham Website Kent Regional Office TN16 3BN Approval Date Organisational Data Name
    [Show full text]
  • Requirements and Selection of Design Concepts to Be Investigated
    GF_WP1_TN_Requirements GF_WP1_TN_Requirements Department of Automotive and Aeronautical Engineering Hamburg University of Applied Sciences (HAW) Berliner Tor 9 D - 20099 Hamburg Green Freighter – Requirements and Selection of Design Concepts to be Investigated Kolja Seeckt Dieter Scholz 2007-11-29 Technical Note 1 GF_WP1_TN_Requirements Dokumentationsblatt 1. Berichts-Nr. 2. Auftragstitel 3. ISSN / ISBN GF_WP1_TN_Requirements Grüner Frachter (Entwurfsuntersuchungen zu --- umweltfreundlichen und kosteneffektiven Fracht- flugzeugen mit unkonventioneller Konfiguration) 4. Sachtitel und Untertitel 5. Abschlussdatum Green Freighter – Requirements and Selection of Design Concepts to 29.11.2007 be Investigated 6. Ber. Nr. Auftragnehmer GF_WP1_TN_Requirements 7. Autor(en) (Vorname, Name) 8. Vertragskennzeichen Kolja Seeckt ([email protected]) 1710X06 Dieter Scholz ([email protected]) 9. Projektnummer FBMBF06-004 10. Durchführende Institution (Name, Anschrift) 11. Berichtsart Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften Hamburg (HAW) Technische Niederschrift Fakultät Technik und Informatik 12. Berichtszeitraum Department Fahrzeugtechnik und Flugzeugbau Forschungsgruppe Flugzeugentwurf und Systeme (Aero) 06.12.2006 - 20.09.2007 Berliner Tor 9 13. Seitenzahl D - 20099 Hamburg 96 14. Fördernde Institution / Projektträger (Name, Anschrift) 15. Literaturangaben Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) 70 Heinemannstraße 2, 53175 Bonn - Bad Godesberg 16. Tabellen Arbeitsgemeinschaft industrieller Forschungsvereinigungen 10 „Otto
    [Show full text]
  • General Aviation Aircraft Design
    Contents 1. The Aircraft Design Process 3.2 Constraint Analysis 57 3.2.1 General Methodology 58 1.1 Introduction 2 3.2.2 Introduction of Stall Speed Limits into 1.1.1 The Content of this Chapter 5 the Constraint Diagram 65 1.1.2 Important Elements of a New Aircraft 3.3 Introduction to Trade Studies 66 Design 5 3.3.1 Step-by-step: Stall Speed e Cruise Speed 1.2 General Process of Aircraft Design 11 Carpet Plot 67 1.2.1 Common Description of the Design Process 11 3.3.2 Design of Experiments 69 1.2.2 Important Regulatory Concepts 13 3.3.3 Cost Functions 72 1.3 Aircraft Design Algorithm 15 Exercises 74 1.3.1 Conceptual Design Algorithm for a GA Variables 75 Aircraft 16 1.3.2 Implementation of the Conceptual 4. Aircraft Conceptual Layout Design Algorithm 16 1.4 Elements of Project Engineering 19 4.1 Introduction 77 1.4.1 Gantt Diagrams 19 4.1.1 The Content of this Chapter 78 1.4.2 Fishbone Diagram for Preliminary 4.1.2 Requirements, Mission, and Applicable Regulations 78 Airplane Design 19 4.1.3 Past and Present Directions in Aircraft Design 79 1.4.3 Managing Compliance with Project 4.1.4 Aircraft Component Recognition 79 Requirements 21 4.2 The Fundamentals of the Configuration Layout 82 1.4.4 Project Plan and Task Management 21 4.2.1 Vertical Wing Location 82 1.4.5 Quality Function Deployment and a House 4.2.2 Wing Configuration 86 of Quality 21 4.2.3 Wing Dihedral 86 1.5 Presenting the Design Project 27 4.2.4 Wing Structural Configuration 87 Variables 32 4.2.5 Cabin Configurations 88 References 32 4.2.6 Propeller Configuration 89 4.2.7 Engine Placement 89 2.
    [Show full text]
  • 14 CFR Ch. I (1–1–16 Edition) § 23.1589
    § 23.1589 14 CFR Ch. I (1–1–16 Edition) (11) The altimeter system calibration (1) Canard, tandem-wing, close-coupled, or required by § 23.1325(e). tailless arrangements of the lifting surfaces; (2) Biplane or multiplane wing arrange- [Doc. No. 27807, 61 FR 5194, Feb. 9, 1996, as ments; amended by Amdt. 23–62, 76 FR 75763, Dec. 2, (3) T-tail, V-tail, or cruciform-tail ( + ) ar- 2011] rangements; (4) Highly-swept wing platform (more than § 23.1589 Loading information. 15-degrees of sweep at the quarter-chord), The following loading information delta planforms, or slatted lifting surfaces; or must be furnished: (5) Winglets or other wing tip devices, or (a) The weight and location of each outboard fins. item of equipment that can be easily removed, relocated, or replaced and A23.3 Special symbols. that is installed when the airplane was n1 = Airplane Positive Maneuvering Limit weighed under the requirement of Load Factor. § 23.25. n2 = Airplane Negative Maneuvering Limit (b) Appropriate loading instructions Load Factor. for each possible loading condition be- n3 = Airplane Positive Gust Limit Load Fac- tor at VC. tween the maximum and minimum n = Airplane Negative Gust Limit Load Fac- weights established under § 23.25, to fa- 4 tor at VC. cilitate the center of gravity remain- nflap = Airplane Positive Limit Load Factor ing within the limits established under With Flaps Fully Extended at VF. § 23.23. [Doc. No. 4080, 29 FR 17955, Dec. 18, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 23–45, 58 FR 42167, Aug. 6, 1993; Amdt. 23–50, 61 FR 5195, Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • ISSEK HSE) Role of Big Data Augmented Horizon Scanning in Strategic and Marketing Analytics
    National Research University Higher School of Economics Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge Big Data Augmented Horizon Scanning: Combination of Quantitative and Qualitative Methods for Strategic and Marketing Analytics [email protected] [email protected] XIX April International Academic Conference on Economic and Social Development Moscow, 11 April 2018 Outline - Role of artificial intelligence and big data in modern analytics - System of Intelligent Foresight Analytics iFORA - Combined quantitative and qualitative analysis methodology and software solutions - Use cases - Conclusion and discussion 2 Growing interest in Artificial Intelligence, Big Data and Machine Learning International analytical reports & news feed 12000 10000 8000 Artificial Intelligence 6000 Big Data Machine Learning 4000 2000 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Russian analytical reports & news feed 800 700 600 500 Artificial Intelligence 400 Big Data 300 Machine Learning 200 100 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 3 Source: System of Intelligent Foresight Analytics iFORA™ (ISSEK HSE) Role of Big Data Augmented Horizon Scanning in Strategic and Marketing Analytics AI-related tasks Tracking latest and challenges trends, technologies, drivers, barriers Market forecasting Trend analysis Understanding S&T modern skills and Instruments for Customers Market Intelligence competences analysis feedback knowledge discovery HR policy Vacancy Feedback mining
    [Show full text]
  • The Aircraft Propulsion the Aircraft Propulsion
    THE AIRCRAFT PROPULSION Aircraft propulsion Contact: Ing. Miroslav Šplíchal, Ph.D. [email protected] Office: A1/0427 Aircraft propulsion Organization of the course Topics of the lectures: 1. History of AE, basic of thermodynamic of heat engines, 2-stroke and 4-stroke cycle 2. Basic parameters of piston engines, types of piston engines 3. Design of piston engines, crank mechanism, 4. Design of piston engines - auxiliary systems of piston engines, 5. Performance characteristics increase performance, propeller. 6. Turbine engines, introduction, input system, centrifugal compressor. 7. Turbine engines - axial compressor, combustion chamber. 8. Turbine engines – turbine, nozzles. 9. Turbine engines - increasing performance, construction of gas turbine engines, 10. Turbine engines - auxiliary systems, fuel-control system. 11. Turboprop engines, gearboxes, performance. 12. Maintenance of turbine engines 13. Ramjet engines and Rocket engines Aircraft propulsion Organization of the course Topics of the seminars: 1. Basic parameters of piston engine + presentation (1-7)- 3.10.2017 2. Parameters of centrifugal flow compressor + presentation(8-14) - 17.10.2017 3. Loading of turbine blade + presentation (15-21)- 31.10.2017 4. Jet engine cycle + presentation (22-28) - 14.11.2017 5. Presentation alternative date Seminar work: Aircraft engines presentation A short PowerPoint presentation, aprox. 10 minutes long. Content of presentation: - a brief history of the engine - the main innovation introduced by engine - engine drawing / cross-section -
    [Show full text]
  • Disrupting the Business Jet: but How? by Ryan S
    Disrupting the Business Jet: But How? By Ryan S. Wood Founder and CEO Frontline Aerospace, Inc Blu from Movie: RIO Just Keep It Simple Overall Aircraft Efficiency 휂 Thermal X 휂 Propulsive Disrupting Engine Performance • Problem is cooling! • Solution go full compressor flow cooling Overall Efficiency = Propulsive x Thermal Ducted Business Fan Jets Drag: Boundary Layer Ingestion (BLI) • drag reduction of 8.6% Source: AIAA Paper: Boundary Layer Ingestion Benefit of the D8 Transport Aircraft. August 24, 2017 SkyFan: Here Is One Way to Disrupt Joined Wing: Weight-Drag Reduction • 5X less bending moment at root • Less drag • Lighter wing Landing Zone Flexibility—Paved Runways •Save Time Business Jets •Get Closer to SkyFan business • Others SkyFan Reaches 2X the airports •Why? Fan thrust to weight ratio Source: CIA Factbook 2010, Top 30 Countries, Paved Runways, 11,441 Fuel Cost per Seat Mile SkyFan is as fuel efficient as Boeing 737-MAX, some 5X competitors SkyFan Circle Range Map (4 pax 5200 nmi) Challenger 350 Gulfstream G280 SkyFan SkyFan Noise Reduction •Engines inside fuselage •Intake/exhaust cowlings •Noise absorbing ducts Electronic Aircraft Window - PanDow Cameras driving internal 8K monitors GE CT7/T700 Engine • 22,000 built • 100 million flight hours • Global MRO • Upgrades Pending Intellectual Property (IP) •SkyFan Utility Patent •Engine drive ducted fan propulsion •Engine Isothermal compression (2) SkyFan Performance Metric Comparison SkyFan • Pick any set of metrics • Thrill index= (thrust/weight) • Aircraft Total Value= Bus Jets S*R*P*Airports/DOC* TOGW*Purchase Price Determining Market Demand—Mee Inc How to Price SkyFan? SkyFan Market Demand Curve – Mee Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sad Saga of the Beechcraft Starship. Captains Kirk and Picard
    50SKYSHADESImage not found or type unknown- aviation news THE SAD SAGA OF THE BEECHCRAFT STARSHIP News / Manufacturer Image not found or type unknown Captains Kirk and Picard had starships to explore the universe. Earthly mortals could have had futuristic Starships to crisscross the world, but circumstances, both in development and marketing, limited the success of what was otherwise a stunning aircraft. © 2015-2021 50SKYSHADES.COM — Reproduction, copying, or redistribution for commercial purposes is prohibited. 1 In the early 1980s, Beechcraft began looking for a successor to its popular King Air. The objective was for this successor to be faster, quieter, and safer with an equal or greater payload, and, of course have the sales success as the King Air. Developmental History The design result was a sleek, twin turboprop pusher, canard design. Another goal was to use composite materials to maximum extent possible to reduce weight and increase structural integrity compared to the metal structures of their previous aircraft. An added safety feature of the canard design is that it would be essentially stall proof. Canards are a front wing that actually produce lift. As the aircraft approaches a stall, the canards stall first, causing the nose to drop slightly, ensuring that the main wing continues to fly, enabling a prompt stall recovery. Although there several very successful canard experimental aircraft such as the Rutan Long E Z and the Velocity, a six-to-eight passenger composite canard was a new concept, and Beechcraft would experience unexpected developmental challenges. The Starship is a two-surface aircraft, i.e., it has a main wing and the canard, while the canard Piaggio P.180, successfully introduced in 1990, is a three-surface design that includes a conventional horizontal stabilizer and elevators.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Design of a Business Jet Aircraft
    International Conference on Mechanical, Industrial and Energy Engineering 2014 25-26 December, 2014, Khulna, BANGLADESH ICMIEE-PI-14035310 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF A BUSINESS JET AIRCRAFT Jannatun Nawar 1,*, Nafisa Nawal Probha 2 Adnan Shariar 3, Abdul Wahid4, Saifur Rahman Bakaul5 1,2,3,4 Student, Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Military Institute of Science & Technology, Dhaka-1216, 5 Associate Professor , Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Military Institute of Science & Technology, Dhaka-1216, ABSTRACT The modern jet transport is considered as one of the finest integration of technologies. Its economic success depends on performance, low maintenance costs and high passenger appeal and design plays a vital role in summing up all these factors. Conceptual design is the first step to design of an aircraft. In this paper a business jet aircraft is designed to carry 8 passengers and to cover a range of 2000 NM with maximum Mach No of 0.7 and with maximum ceiling of 29,000 ft. The conceptual design consisted of initial sizing, aerodynamics and performance analysis. Through trade studies and comparison with other business jet aircrafts a final model of the aircraft was built to achieve the requirements. Key Words: Business jet, Conceptual design, Initial Sizing, Aerodynamics, Aircraft performance, Trade study. 1. Introduction Airplane design is an art with scientifically approach. It requires both the intellectual engineering and ngiseD ygolDchceT cDogne sensible assumptions. Aircraft design is actually sgnesegigDei ytbshbashseT hcgeol done to meet certain specifications and requirements established by potential users or pioneer innovative, new ideas and technology. Now-a-days business jet aircraft is one of the most popular forms of transport aircraft.
    [Show full text]