Chapter Two: the First World

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter Two: the First World CHAPTER TWO THE FIRST WORLD WAR During the First World War, Charles and Frank Altschul and the interconnected network of firms in London, Paris, and New York to which they belonged ranged themselves uncompromisingly with the Allied powers, Great Britain and France, and hoped that the war would permanently strengthen links between those powers and the United States. It was not necessarily a foregone conclusion that the two Altschuls should take this position. The outbreak of the First World War in August 1914 represented a major challenge to the cosmopolitan financial elite to which both men belonged, and likewise to the German American and American Jewish communities. The conflict disrupted the intricate network of financial ties linking the great Anglo-European banking houses, as belligerent governments imposed economic and financial controls and sought to deprive their enemies of access to resources of every kind, including basic commodities, munitions of war, and access to credit and loans.1 For almost three years, from August 1914 to April 1917, the United States remained neutral in the war. This did not, however, ensure the country immunity from its impact. During that time, bitter political debates raged over just how strongly the United States government headed by Democratic President Woodrow Wilson should assert the rights of American individuals and businesses to travel to and trade with belligerent nations, and how forcefully it should respond to German attacks on Allied vessels on which American citizens were travelling, or to German efforts to cut off commerce with the Allies. Those Americans who sympathized with the Allied powers, Great Britain, France, and Russia, generally supported a liberal policy in terms of permitting trade with belligerent powers. In practice British control of the seas meant that the balance of such trade was overwhelmingly in the Allies’ favor. Access to supplies from North American factories and farms, plus the funds to finance these purchases, was indeed a key factor in the Allies’ ability to wage all-out war against the Central Powers, Germany, Austria-Hungary, and the Ottoman Empire. Pro-Allied Americans also generally believed that their government should be extremely firm in defending neutral rights, even if by doing so, the country risked war with Germany over incidents in which German submarines sank passenger liners and merchant ships without warning, killing Americans traveling on them. Opponents of American intervention in the war, and those who favored the Central Powers, were usually far readier to compromise on neutral rights. Many who were pro-German, anti-war, or both, urged politicians and the government to impose a ban on private American commerce with any belligerent power, and sought to prevent belligerents using Americans loans or credits to finance such trade. In an 1 On the economic impact of the First World War, see esp. Hew Strachan, The First World War, Vol. I: To Arms (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), chs. 10-11; David Stevenson, Cataclysm: The First World War as Political Tragedy (New York: Basic Books, 2004), ch. 9; Niall Ferguson, The Pity of War: Explaining World War I (New York: Basic Books, 1998), chs. 4, 5, 9, and 11; Barry Eichengreen, Golden Fetters: The Gold Standard and the Great Depression 1919-1939 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992), 67-99; David Kynaston, The City of London, Vol. III: Illusions of Gold 1914-1945 (London: Chatto and Windus, 1999), 3-50; and Gerd Hardach, The First World War 1914-1918 (London: Allen Lane, 1977). 1 effort to prevent diplomatic crises over the loss of American lives spiraling into war, they were also willing to contemplate an embargo prohibiting American citizens from travelling on ships of 2 belligerent powers. Nowhere were the debates over these issues more intense than in the New York financial community. Many Americans who belonged to the patrician elite of the United States Northeast were immediately and profoundly pro-Allied in sympathy. Leading New York politicians, bankers, and lawyers identified themselves almost completely with the Allied cause. From August 1914 onward, the East Coast patrician elite virtually immediately adopted a staunchly pro-Allied outlook. Leading New York politicians, bankers, and lawyers identified almost completely with the Allies. They included such figures as Theodore Roosevelt and his younger cousin Franklin, then assistant secretary of the navy; the various partners of the leading investment bank, J. P. Morgan & Company; Benjamin Strong, the first governor of the new Federal Reserve Bank of New York; Robert Bacon, a former Morgan partner who had served as secretary of state; and the lawyer-politicians Elihu Root and Henry L. Stimson, members of the same law firm who each had served or would serve as both secretary of war and secretary of defense. They stressed the demands of national security and the need to maintain a balance of power by means of a German defeat and the conclusion of a formal or informal American alliance with Britain and France. This outlook emphasized military strength and permanent increases in American defense spending. Its proponents also perceived the war in moral terms, arguing vehemently that Germany was morally wrong and the Allies right, and the war a global battle for supremacy between the forces of good and evil, pitting civilization, liberty, and democracy against authoritarian “Prussianism,” “Kaiserism,” absolutism, and despotic militarism. The British and French, they contended, were defending Anglo-Saxon democratic institutions, “Christendom,” and the values of “Western civilization” against a German attempt 3 to impose Teutonic despotism on the entire world. During the First World War the Eastern foreign policy elite generally rejected President Woodrow Wilson’s advice that Americans should be “impartial in thought as well as in action”, 2 For overviews of U.S. wartime diplomacy during the 1914-1917 period of neutrality, see Arthur S. Link, Wilson: The Struggle for Neutrality 1914-1915 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1960); Link, Wilson: Confusions and Crises 1915-1916 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1964); Link, Wilson: Campaigns for Progressivism and Peace 1916-1917 Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1965); John Milton Cooper, Jr., The Vanity of Power: American Isolationism and World War I, 1915-1917 (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1970); Patrick Devlin, Too Proud to Fight: Woodrow Wilson’s Neutrality (New York: Oxford University Press, 1975); John A. Thompson, Woodrow Wilson (London: Longman, 2002); and Ernest R. May, The World War and American Isolation 1914- 1917 (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1965). 3 Priscilla Roberts, “The First World War and the Emergence of American Atlanticism, 1914-1920”, Diplomacy and Statecraft 5:3 (November 1994), 569-619; see also Priscilla Roberts, “The Anglo-American Theme: American Visions of an Atlantic Alliance, 1914-1944” Diplomatic History 21:3 (Summer 1997), 333-364; Nicholas Cull, “Selling Peace: The Origins, Promotion and Fate of the Anglo-American New Order during World War II,” Diplomacy and Statecraft 7:1 (March 1996), 1-10; Henry F. May, The End of American Innocence: A Study of the First Years of Our Own Time, 1912-1917 (London: Jonathan Cape, 1959), 363-367. 2 and found the president’s diplomacy insufficiently pro-Allied. They themselves generally supported American intervention in the war, in anticipation of which several became vigorous advocates of ‘preparedness,’ the campaign to increase United States defense spending and in many cases to introduce a national program of universal military training. United States firms supplied around 25% of the Allies’ war matériel, a vital contribution to the Allied war effort. Pro-Allied Eastern bankers lobbied for the relaxation of government controls on this trade, while the lawyers furnished legal arguments justifiying such policies on the grounds that they did not contravene American neutrality. When the United States government found itself at odds with both the Allied and Central Powers as disputes arose over the right of supposedly neutral Americans to trade with belligerent powers and to safe travel on belligerent merchant shipping, these Allied partisans almost invariably urged that their government take an uncompromising stand against Germany, while supporting more conciliatory policies toward the Allies. The Morgan firm and the New York Federal Reserve Bank took the lead in raising and facilitating the private American loans and credits which increasingly financed the Allies’ war purchases. A decisive Allied victory was, they believed, essential, since only this would suffice to guarantee lasting peace. In the longer term, they supported American membership in an international organization to maintain peace, a body in which the United States, Britain, and perhaps France would be the dominant powers, capable of imposing military and economic order upon the rest 4 of the world. Such proposals effectively represented the fulfilment of suggestions for a de facto Anglo- 5 American alliance already current among British and American elites in the prewar period. It was an outlook underpinned by popular social Darwinist ideas of the superiority of the Anglo- Saxon or English-speaking nations current in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the belief disseminated by numerous influential historians and political theorists that the Anglo- Saxon race, in effect the British and Americans, was uniquely
Recommended publications
  • Xerox University Microfilms
    INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning” the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • De Witt Clinton and the Origin of the Spoils System in New York
    73] Cornell University Library JK 731.M2 ... De Witt Clinton and the origin of th 3 1924 002 312 662 SlrUDEES IN HISTORY, ECONOMIOS AND PUBLIC LAW EDITED BY THE FACULTY OF POLITICAL SCIENCE OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY Volume XXVIII] [Number 1 De WITT CLINTON AUD THE ORIGIN OF THE SPOILS SYSTEM IN NEW YORK HOWARD LEE McBAIN, Ph.D., /Sometime Honorary Fellow in Constitutional Lam, Colwmhia Univeriity THE COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY PRESS THE MACMILLAN COMPANY, AGENTS London : P. S. King & Son 1907 THE LIBRARY OF THE NEW YORK STATE SCHOOL OF INDUSTRIAL AND LABOR RELATIONS AT CORNELL UNIVERSITY 1 DeWITT CLINTON AND THE ORIOIN OF THE SPOILS SYSTEM IN NEW YORK Cornell University Library The original of tiiis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924002312662 STUDIES IN HISTORY, ECONOMICS AND PUBLIC LAW EDITED BY THE FACULTY OF POLITICAL SCIENCE OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY Volume XXVIII] [Number 1 De WITT CLINTON AND THE ORIGIN OF THE SPOILS SYSTEM IN NEW YORK HOWARD LEE McBAIN, Ph.D., Sometime Honorary Fellow in Constitutional Law, Colvmhia University THE COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY PRESS THE MACMILLAN COMPANY, AGENTS London : P. S. King & Son 1907 Copyright, 1907, BY HOWARD LEE McBAIN 1 JK 1S) CONTENTS CHAPTER I EARLY PATRONAGE UNDER THE CONSTITUTION PAGE Introduction 11-15 Misrepresentations of DeWitt Clinton's policies 11-12 Sources for study of 12 Plan of present study of New York patronage 13-15 Relation of systems previous to 1801 13 Relation of national systems I3~i5 Washington's policy of patronage 15-25 His problems differ from those of his successors 16-17 His attitude toward anti-adoptionists 17-20 In general 17-18 In Rhode Island 18-20 His consideration of Revolutionary services 20-21 His general principles in making appointments 21-23 Later consideration of politics in cabinet appointments 23-24 His New York appointments—Theory of Hamiltonian influencejrefuted.
    [Show full text]
  • The Creation of the Franklin D. Roosevelt Library
    The Creation of the Franklin D. Roosevelt Library: A Personal Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/american-archivist/article-pdf/18/1/11/2743475/aarc_18_1_83858324503u51m1.pdf by guest on 24 September 2021 Narrative* By WALDO GIFFORD LELAND Director Emeritus, American Council of Learned Societies N December 11, 1938, the readers of the Sunday newspapers learned that on the previous day President Franklin D. O Roosevelt had announced to a party of 18 persons assembled at luncheon in the White House a long-cherished plan to present to the United States his already vast accumulation of correspond- ence and other papers, documents, books, pamphlets, pictures, and objects of personal or historic interest. He proposed to place these collections in a building which should be erected at private cost, on a plot of land donated to the United States from the estate then owned by his mother, on the Albany Post Road about 5 miles north of Poughkeepsie, N. Y. At the same time he announced his expec- tation that the rest of the hundred acres or more between the Post Road and the Hudson River, on which the family residence was situated, would, as he expressed it, "eventually go to the Federal Government to be maintained for the benefit of the public." Both the intention and the expectation have been realized. The luncheon guests included, in addition to Judge Samuel I. Rosenman and Mr. Frank C. Walker, university presidents Ed- 1 This paper is based upon materials in the author's file, kept as chairman of the Executive Committee, which will be transferred to the National Archives in due time, and in a special file in the office of the Archivist of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes to the Introduction I the Expansion of England
    NOTES Abbreviations used in the notes: BDEE British Documents of the End of Empire Cab. Cabinet Office papers C.O. Commonwealth Office JICH journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History Notes to the Introduction 1. J. C. D. Clark, '"The Strange Death of British History?" Reflections on Anglo-American Scholarship', Historical journal, 40: 3 (1997), pp. 787-809 at pp. 803, 809. 2. S. R. Ashton and S. E. Stockwell (eds), British Documents of the End of Empire, series A, vol. I: Imperial Policy and Colonial Practice, 1925-1945, part I: Metro­ politan Reorganisation, Defence and International Relations, Political Change and Constitutional Reform (London: HMSO, 1996), p. xxxix. Some general state­ ments were collected, with statements on individual colonies, and submitted to Harold Macmillan, who dismissed them as 'scrappy, obscure and jejune, and totally unsuitable for publication' (ibid., pp. 169-70). 3. Clark,' "The Strange Death of British History"', p. 803. 4. Alfred Cobban, The Nation State and National Self-Determination (London: Fontana, 1969; first issued 1945 ), pp. 305-6. 5. Ibid., p. 306. 6. For a penetrating analysis of English constitutional thinking see William M. Johnston, Commemorations: The Cult of Anniversaries in Europe and the United States Today (New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers, 1991). 7. Elizabeth Mancke, 'Another British America: a Canadian Model for the Early Modern British Empire',]ICH, 25: 1 (January 1997), pp. 1-36, at p. 3. I The Expansion of England 1. R. A. Griffiths, 'This Royal Throne ofKings, this Scept'red Isle': The English Realm and Nation in the later Middle Ages (Swansea, 1983), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Wilson-Smuts Synthesis: Racial Self
    The Wilson-Smuts Synthesis: Racial Self-Determination and the Institutionalization of World Order A thesis submitted by Scott L. Malcomson in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in International Relations Tufts University Fletcher School of International Law and Diplomacy January 2020 Adviser: Jeffrey W. Taliaferro ©2019, Scott L. Malcomson 1 Table of Contents I: Introduction 3 II: Two Paths to Paris. Jan Smuts 8 Woodrow Wilson 26 The Paths Converge 37 III: Versailles. Wilson Stays Out: Isolation and Neutrality 43 Lloyd George: Bringing the Empire on Board 50 Smuts Goes In: The Rise of the Dominions 54 The Wilson-Smuts Synthesis 65 Wilson Undone 72 The Racial Equality Bill 84 IV: Conclusion 103 Bibliography 116 2 I: Introduction When President Woodrow Wilson left the United States for Europe at the end of 1918, he intended to create a new structure for international relations, based on a League of Nations, that would replace the pre-existing imperialist world structure with one based on national and racial (as was said at the time) self-determination. The results Wilson achieved by late April 1919, after several months of near-daily negotiation in Paris, varied between partial success and complete failure.1 Wilson had had other important goals in Paris, including establishing a framework for international arbitration of disputes, advancing labor rights, and promoting free trade and disarmament, and progress was made on all of these. But in terms of his own biography and the distinctive mission of U.S. foreign policy as he and other Americans understood it, the anti- imperial and pro-self-determination goals were paramount.
    [Show full text]
  • Stephen Gwynn and the Failure Of
    The Historical Journal , 53, 3 (2010), pp. 723–745 f Cambridge University Press 2010 doi:10.1017/S0018246X10000269 STEPHEN GWYNN AND THE FAILURE OF CONSTITUTIONAL NATIONALISM View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE IN IRELAND , 1919 –1921 * provided by Northumbria Research Link COLIN REID NUI Maynooth ABSTRACT . The Irish Party, the organization which represented the constitutional nationalist demand for home rule for almost fifty years in Westminster, was the most notable victim of the revolution in Ireland, c. 1916–23. Most of the last generation of Westminster-centred home rule MPs played little part in public life following the party’s electoral destruction in 1918. This article probes the political thought and actions of one of the most prominent constitutional nationalists who did seek to alter Ireland’s direction during the critical years of the war of independence. Stephen Gwynn was a guiding figure behind a number of initiatives to ‘save’ Ireland from the excesses of revolution. Gwynn established the Irish Centre Party in 1919, which later merged with the Irish Dominion League. From the end of 1919, Gwynn became a leading advocate of the Government of Ireland Bill, the legislation that partitioned the island. Revolutionary idealism – and, more concretely, violence – did much to render his reconciliatory efforts impotent. Gwynn’s experiences between 1919 and 1921 also, however, reveal the paralysing divisions within constitutional nationalism, which did much to demoralize moderate sentiment further. As the Great War lurched towards its bloody climax in 1918, the Irish nationalist maverick, William O’Brien, published a pamphlet proclaiming the death of the home rule project in Ireland.
    [Show full text]
  • E Oun a Le Ove Ent in Aris an T E Ise of a E Orl R Er After I
    A. ONORIO COORN i ..v e oun ale oveent in aris an te ise of a e orl rer after I nro norio Astrat The Paris Peace Conference represented a turning point for the British Empire. Great Britain and its Dominions placed on the side of the Entente all their military might together with the most powerful navy. However, at the end of the war, Britain, in spite of being a victorious country, saw its world hegemony reduced and its control over the widest Empire in the history of the world irremediably affected. On the other side of the Atlantic, the United States turned out to be the real winner of the war and this gave them great leverage in Paris in shaping the new international order. However, the passage from the period of the Pa Britannia, which for almost a century granted stability in Europe, to the Pa meriana, was not so unexpected and painful for the British political establishment as we usually think. Among the British establishment, there was a movement that was able to shape the country’s foreign policy for more than twenty years and prepared the ground for the creation of the Anglo-American alliance. This article tries to focus on the circumstances that made possible this tranatio imerii and the role played by the Round Table movement in Paris in this respect. eors Paris peace conference, federalism, Round Table movement, British empire, world order, Atlanticism, Anglo-American relationship, ionel Curtis, Philip Kerr Introution ain te founations of a ne orl orer The Twentieth Century is in many ways the century that saw the United States rising to become a global power.
    [Show full text]
  • 373-2126 Fact Shee
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF UNIVERSITY RELATIONS 217 MORRILL HALL, MINNEAPOLIS TELEPHONE: 373-2126 AUGUST 13, 1966 FACT SHEE~ Materials contained in this FACT SHEET are for release at 4 p.m., Pacific Coast Time, and at 6 p.m., Minnesota time, on Saturday, August 13, 1966. They are to be used in connection with an announcement by the Center for Advanced Study ~n the Behavioral Sc~ences, Stanford, Cal~forn~a. SUBJECT: The announcement, by the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, of the appointment, as its Director, of Dr. 0. Meredith Wilson, President of the University of Minne­ sota, beg~nn~ng July 1, 1967. CONTENT: I. THE CBNTER FOR ADVANCED STUDY IN THE BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES II. DR. 0. MEREDITH WILSON -- BIOGRAPHICAL MATERIAL III. DR. 0. MEREDITH WILSON'S ADMINISTRATION OF THE UNIVERSITY 1960 - PRESENT IV. THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA v. STATEMENTS BY PRESIDENT WILSON, DR. MAYO, AND DR. NIER VI. STATEf1ENT BY DR. MAYO ON CHOOSING A NEW PRESIDENT (RED PAPER: OF SPECIAL INTEREST IN MINNESOTA). ....._ .. ... I. TH~ CENTtR FOR ADVANCED STUDY IN THE BEHAVIORAL SciENCES What it is: The Center is a new kind of institution for the study of human behavior. Post-doctoral research is conducted by some 50 scientists and scholars in the behavioral sciences, in an atmosphere of freedom and isolation from the normal duties and distractions to be found in colleges and universities. When started: Fall, 1954. Where it is: The Center is at Stanford, California, near Stanford Univer­ sity but unconnected with it. Physical setting: The campus, situated on a bluff 300 feet above the Pacific, combines a beautiful natural setting with a number of simple, modern one-story buildings featuring redwood and glass exteriors.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Use of the Term 'Commonwealth'
    This article was downloaded by: [Commonwealth Secretariat] On: 30 March 2012, At: 04:07 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Journal of Commonwealth Political Studies Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fccp18 On the use of the term ‘commonwealth’ S. R. Mehrotra a a School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London Available online: 25 Mar 2008 To cite this article: S. R. Mehrotra (1963): On the use of the term ‘commonwealth’, Journal of Commonwealth Political Studies, 2:1, 1-16 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14662046308446985 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material. ON THE USE OF THE TERM 'COMMONWEALTH' BY S.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Libraries, May-June 1940
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Special Libraries, 1940 Special Libraries, 1940s 5-1-1940 Special Libraries, May-June 1940 Special Libraries Association Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/sla_sl_1940 Part of the Cataloging and Metadata Commons, Collection Development and Management Commons, Information Literacy Commons, and the Scholarly Communication Commons Recommended Citation Special Libraries Association, "Special Libraries, May-June 1940" (1940). Special Libraries, 1940. 5. https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/sla_sl_1940/5 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Special Libraries, 1940s at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Special Libraries, 1940 by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Special Libraries Oficial Journal of the Spscial Libraries Associ&m * PARTIAL LIST OF ORGANIZATIONS IN WHICH SPBCIAL LIBRARIES ARE OPERATING * ADVERTISING AGENCIES AERONAUTICAL MANUFA~URERS AGRICULTURAL COLLBG~ ARCHITECTS' OFFICES ART MUSEUMS AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTURERS BAKING COMPANIaS BANKS BOTANIC GARDENS BROADCASTING SYSTEMS CAMERA CLUBS CEMENT MANUPACTURERS CAAIN STORES 1 CHAMBERS OF COMMERCB CHARITY ORGANIZATIONS CHEMICAL COMPANIES CHURCHES CLUBS CONSUMER RESEARCH AGENCIES DAIRY LEAGUES DENTAL SCHOOLS DBPARTMENT STORES ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANIES ELECTRICAL MANUPACTURERS FOOD DISTRIBUTORS FOREST SERVICES FOUNDATIONS FRATERNAL ORGANIZATIONS FRUIT COMPANIES PUND-RAISERS GAS COMPANIES GLASS MANUPACTURBRS
    [Show full text]
  • Mr Miller Is Right to Connect This Change with a Decline in British Belief in the Commonwealth, Though This Has Other Causes Also
    REVIEWS 91 Mr Miller is right to connect this change with a decline in British belief in the Commonwealth, though this has other causes also. This is not the place to discuss Britain's 'turning away from Commonwealth markets and supplies towards its traditional areas of interest in Europe' except that we may ask whether 'traditional' is quite the right word when the greatest achievement of the last four hundred years of British history is that some three hundred million people outside the British Isles speak English. After discussing many of these changes — the break-up of the sterling area, the development of the E.E.C. and Britain's relations to it, Commonwealth immigration, changes in Common- wealth machinery (notably the creation of the Commonwealth Secretariat) and other 'networks of custom and convenience' Mr Miller closes this massive and thought provoking book with a brief review in which he notes one distinguishing characteristic of the Commonwealth which perhaps deserves more emphasis than he gives it, that it is an association of peoples as well as of governments. That, as a recent visit to Europe reminded the reviewer, the E.E.C. at present is certainly not. Maybe this work of 550 closely-printed pages and over a quarter of a million words will not be read from cover to cover by many. The price certainly seems excessive in view of the present relation of the New Zealand dollar and the pound sterling. But it will be an indispensable work of reference and those who dip into it for that reason will, we hope, read on, for it will reward their effort.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Minnesota
    University of Minnesota COMMENCEMENT CONVOCATION WINTER QUARTER 1939 NORTHROP :MEMORIAL AUDITORIUM Thursday, March 23, 1939, Eleven O'Clock PROGRAM PRESIDENT GUY STANTON FORD, Presiding PROCESSIONAL-Allegro Gothique - - Boellmann ARTHUR B. JENNINGS University Organist HYMN-HAmerica" My country! 'tis of thee, Our fathers' God! to Thee, Sweet land of liberty, Author of Liberty Of thee I sing; To Thee we sing; Land where our fathers died ! Long may our land be bright Land of the Pilgrims' pride With freedom's holy light; From every mountain side Protect us by Thy might Let freedom ring. Great God our King. COMMENCEMENT ADDRESS- HOn Educating Whole Men" DIXON RYAN Fox, Ph.D., LL.D., D.C.L., L.H.D., Litt.D. President, Union College, Schenectady, New York CONFERRING OF DEGREES GUY STANTON FORD, Ph.D., LL.D., Litt.D. President of the University 2 SONG-"Hail, Minnesota!" Minnesota, hail to thee! Like the stream that bends to sea, Hail to thee, our College dear! Like the pine that seeks the blue! Thy light shall ever be Minnesota, still for thee, A beacon bright and clear; Thy: sons are strong and true. Thy sons and daughters true From thy woods and waters fair, Will proclaim thee near and far; From thy prairies waving far They will guard thy fame At thy call they throng, And adore thy name; With their shout and song, Thou shalt be their Northern Star. Hailing thee their Northern Star. POSTLUDE-Toccata Boellmann ARTHUR B. JENNINGS University Organist SMOKING As a courtesy to those attending functions, and out of respect for the character of the building, be it resolved by the Board of Regents that there be printed in the programs of aU functions held in the Cyrus Northrop Memorial Auditorium a request that smoking be confined to the outer lobby on the main floor, to the gallery lobbies, and to the lounge rooms.
    [Show full text]