The 1997 GSA Honors and Awards

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The 1997 GSA Honors and Awards Copyright © 1998 by the Genetics Society of America The 1997 GSA Honors and Awards The Genetics Society of America makes two awards annually to honor members who have made out- standing contributions to the science of genetics. The Thomas Hunt Morgan Medal recognizes a lifetime contribution to genetics. The Genetics Society of America Medal recognizes particularly outstanding contributions to genetics within the past fifteen years. We are pleased to announce the 1997 awards. The 1997 Thomas Hunt Morgan Medal Oliver Evans Nelson, Jr. Oliver Evans Nelson, Jr. in the lab. Photo by B. Wolfgang Hoffmann. LIVER EVANS NELSON, JR. exemplifies a “life- tion. Here he worked with D. F. Jones, a well-known O time contribution to genetics.” His published work corn breeder and geneticist. His early interest in genet- spans a 50-year period and includes seminal contribu- ics was further developed by training he received under tions in several different areas of investigation. Al- E. W. Sinnott. Oliver completed his doctoral research though focused on maize, the results of his research under D. F. Jones at Yale in 1947 and thereupon as- have had profound and broad impact on agronomic sumed a faculty position at Purdue University where he genetics, physiological genetics of plants, and eukary- remained until 1969. During these years, he initiated a otic gene structure and function. successful popcorn breeding program—some of the Oliver was born in Seattle in 1920. After receiving lines he developed are still in commercial use. his early education in the New Haven area, he was in- In the 1950’s Oliver realized that the expression of troduced to genetics before starting college during a the waxy gene in pollen grains afforded a unique op- summer working as an assistant in the Department of portunity to screen very large numbers of gametes for Genetics, Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Sta- rare recombinants. Utilizing this system, he carried out Genetics 148: 1–6 ( January, 1998) 2 Honors and Awards the first fine structure analysis of a gene in higher bronze gene. This represented the first successful appli- plants. This was one of the first and most detailed stud- cation of transposon tagging in plants and established ies of its kind in any eukaryote. One of the important the bronze locus, with its many interesting alleles, as a discoveries from this investigation was the demonstra- model system for investigation of gene regulation in tion that transposable elements mapped throughout plants and the effect of transposable elements at the the gene long before such ideas were part of the ac- molecular level. cepted wisdom. Oliver’s fine structure work on waxy was Oliver also continued to pursue a long-standing in- undoubtedly stimulated by the analysis of the rII locus be- terest in the biosynthesis of starch. His earlier discovery ing conducted by his Purdue colleague, Seymour Benzer. that the waxy locus encoded a starch-bound ADP-glu- In turn, on a trip through the cornfields with Seymour, cose glucosyl transferase was one of the first to relate a Oliver drew Seymour’s attention to a nongeotropic mu- phenotypically identified plant gene with the underly- tant cornstalk crawling along the ground. This experi- ing enzymatic defect. Although for many years the ence helped convince Seymour to choose Drosophila topic received little attention, the importance of starch when he decided to work on behavioral genetics. in cereals, roots, and tubers as a major food source for Another of Oliver’s seminal contributions during humans and domesticated animals as well its impor- the Purdue years was the discovery, with biochemist Ed- tance as an industrial commodity have contributed to win T. Mertz, of mutants with a high content of lysine renewed interest in starch synthesis and its modifica- and tryptophan, thereby greatly enhancing the food tion through genetics and biotechnology. Most of what value of corn. This was no accidental discovery but the is currently known about the biochemical lesions re- outcome of a deliberate search based on Oliver’s deep sponsible for quantitative or qualitative alterations in knowledge of the corn kernel and the properties of the starch biosynthesis is based on mutations first identi- available mutants. Feeding studies with rats were re- fied in maize. Oliver and his students have been major markable. Laboratory rats grown on opaque-2 grew contributors to these studies. After his retirement in more than three times faster than rats fed on ordinary 1991, work on the bronze gene and on starch biosynthe- corn. This pioneering achievement led to further work sis continued to occupy Oliver’s attention. in other plants, such as sorghum, and in making plant Oliver has received numerous prestigious awards and breeders aware of the fact that nutritional quality could honors for his achievements including election to the Na- be improved through selection. The agricultural im- tional Academy of Sciences in 1972. Among his most last- pact of this pioneering achievement continues to be ing contributions are the numerous students and post- felt today. doctoral associates that he trained. In 1990 his former Early on, Oliver recognized the importance of being students and colleagues dedicated a commemorative is- able to characterize the enzymatic defect in various sue of Maydica, the specialty journal of maize genetics, to maize mutants to address problems of basic genetic sig- Oliver upon the occasion of his seventieth birthday. Ol- nificance, particularly those concerned with gene struc- iver joins other luminaries, including R. A. Brink, Edward ture, function, and regulation. He worked toward this Coe, Marcus Rhoades, and Barbara McClintock (all of aim beginning with a sabbatical in 1954 at the Bio- whom were themselves recipients of the Thomas Hunt chemical Institute at the University of Stockholm. He Morgan Medal), in being honored with such a commem- continued this pursuit with another sabbatical leave in orative issue. The respect, admiration, and affection with 1961 at the California Institute of Technology. His sub- which Oliver is regarded by his students and associates is sequent biochemical studies on the biosynthesis of quite apparent in this commemorative issue. starch, lignin, protein, and anthocyanin in seeds were Oliver has never avoided taking on extra responsibil- one outcome of these sabbaticals. Another was his mar- ities. He served as Chair of the Laboratory of Genetics riage to Gerda in 1963 after making her acquaintance from 1986 to 1989 and for many years was the local or- first in Stockholm and then crossing paths with her ganizer of the annual maize genetics conference. In his again later in California. Perhaps unsurprisingly, Oliver free time, Oliver enjoyed life in the country and out- has not been permitted another sabbatical since. door activities. Over the years, he has been an avid In 1969, Oliver moved to the Laboratory of Genetics golfer, gardener, and companion to golden retrievers. at the University of Wisconsin, to fill the vacancy cre- As a scientist, Oliver’s enormous contributions to ag- ated upon the retirement of R. A. Brink. Fortunately, riculture and to basic genetics, his clarity of vision, and Brink’s retirement was an active one and the interac- his deep knowledge and insights have been an inspira- tions between Nelson and Brink provided a fertile and tion and an example for others to follow. As a person, stimulating environment for the training of new gener- in his modest demeanor and in his comportment al- ations of corn geneticists. Beginning in the late 1960s, ways as a gentleman, Oliver is also worthy of respect Oliver focused on developing a system in which the ef- and emulation. This year’s Thomas Hunt Morgan fect of transposable elements on the function of a gene Medal honors the remarkable achievements of a re- could be assayed at the protein level. In collaboration markable man. with Nina Fedoroff, Oliver’s laboratory cloned the Barry Ganetzky Honors and Awards 3 The 1997 Genetics Society of America Medal Christine Guthrie Christine Guthrie in 1991. Photo by Bill Santos. HRISTINE GUTHRIE’s outstanding contributions force. Although many questions about the relevance of C to the understanding of nuclear premessenger yeast snRNAs to events in mammalian cells remained, RNA splicing have been recognized with the awarding future events would reveal Christine’s pioneering work of the 1997 Genetics Society of America Medal. In the in this area to be foundational to the understanding of 20 years since the unanticipated presence of introns in both premessenger RNA splicing and eukaryotic preri- eukaryotic genes was revealed, no one else has applied bosomal RNA processing. “the awesome power of yeast genetics” more consis- In addition to leading the chase for cellular factors tently and successfully to the how and why of splicing. that might carry out splicing, Christine and her col- Confronted with the challenge to identify the ma- leagues created intron-containing reporter genes chinery and mechanisms of intron removal, and whose expression depended on splicing. The yeast ac- charged by the provocative hypothesis that small nu- tin intron served as a model, and tests of mutations in clear RNAs (snRNAs) might be involved in splicing, the conserved splice sites and branchpoint sequences Christine and her colleagues set out in the early ’80s within the intron revealed a complex set of molecular to discover whether yeast might have snRNAs. Using phenotypes: some mutations blocked splicing com- antibodies against the unusual vertebrate snRNA cap pletely, others allowed only the first steps of splicing, structure and a clever labeling strategy that got around still others shifted the splicing reactions to alternate the presence of contaminating degradation products, sites (Cellini et al. 1986; Parker and Guthrie 1985; Christine showed that yeast has a diverse family of Vijayraghavan et al.
Recommended publications
  • NIHAA Summer 1993
    The Newsletter of the NIH Alumni Association Summer 1993 Vol. 5, No . 2 date Nobel Laureate Harold Varmus Nominated as 14th NIH Director Ruth Kirschstein Named Acting Director President Clinton on A ug. 3 announced his intention to nominate Dr. Harold Eliot Varmus as the 14th director of th e National Institutes of Health. A Senate confirmation process must precede Yarmus· taking over leadership of the institutes. Winner of the Nobel Prize in 1989 for his work in cancer research. Va1111us. 53. is a professor of microbi­ ology. biochemistry. and biophysics. and the American Cancer Society pro­ fessor vfmoh:cu/ur >1iro/O£)' iJI l/Je Uni versity of California, San Francisco. He is a leader in the stu dy of cancer­ causing genes called "oncogenes," and an intemationall-y fecogni:z.ed authof\t-y Dr. Ruth l. Kirschsteln , acting NIH director on retroviruses. the viruses that cause Dr. Harold E. Varmus , direclor-designale AIDS and many cancers in animnl.. FIC 25 Years Old In '93 Thirty-eight-year NIH veteran Dr. Research Festival '93 Schedule Ruth Kirschstein. director of NIGM S Scholars-in-Residence (See Director p. 6) NIHAA Members Invited Program Celebrates To Alumni Symposium In This Issue Tile fas\ morning ofNCH Rc:-.c;\rch Nursing cell/er /J1·1·111111•s Festival '93-Monday. Sept. 20-has This year. the Fogarty Intern ational 17th i11s1it11tc• 111 NII/ p. ? been designated National lnsritute of Center (FIC) is 25 years old . T he cen­ Greeri11gs from 1/,11 1w11• NII /AA prl'sidt'lll. Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Tltolll(IS .I.
    [Show full text]
  • Advertising (PDF)
    Neuroscience 2013 SEE YOU IN San Diego November 9 – 13, 2013 Join the Society for Neuroscience Are you an SfN member? Join now and save on annual meeting registration. You’ll also enjoy these member-only benefits: • Abstract submission — only SfN members can submit abstracts for the annual meeting • Lower registration rates and more housing choices for the annual meeting • The Journal of Neuroscience — access The Journal online and receive a discounted subscription on the print version • Free essential color charges for The Journal of Neuroscience manuscripts, when first and last authors are members • Free online access to the European Journal of Neuroscience • Premium services on NeuroJobs, SfN’s online career resource • Member newsletters, including Neuroscience Quarterly and Nexus If you are not a member or let your membership lapse, there’s never been a better time to join or renew. Visit www.sfn.org/joinnow and start receiving your member benefits today. www.sfn.org/joinnow membership_full_page_ad.indd 1 1/25/10 2:27:58 PM The #1 Cited Journal in Neuroscience* Read The Journal of Neuroscience every week to keep up on what’s happening in the field. s4HENUMBERONECITEDJOURNAL INNEUROSCIENCE s4HEMOSTNEUROSCIENCEARTICLES PUBLISHEDEACHYEARNEARLY in 2011 s )MPACTFACTOR s 0UBLISHEDTIMESAYEAR ,EARNMOREABOUTMEMBERAND INSTITUTIONALSUBSCRIPTIONSAT *.EUROSCIORGSUBSCRIPTIONS *ISI Journal Citation Reports, 2011 The Journal of Neuroscience 4HE/FlCIAL*OURNALOFTHE3OCIETYFOR.EUROSCIENCE THE HISTORY OF NEUROSCIENCE IN AUTOBIOGRAPHY THE LIVES AND DISCOVERIES OF EMINENT SENIOR NEUROSCIENTISTS CAPTURED IN AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL BOOKS AND VIDEOS The History of Neuroscience in Autobiography Series Edited by Larry R. Squire Outstanding neuroscientists tell the stories of their scientific work in this fascinating series of autobiographical essays.
    [Show full text]
  • Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology
    COLD SPRING HARBOR SYMPOSIA ON QUANTITATIVE BIOLOGY VOLUME XL COLD SPRING HARBOR SYMPOSIA 0 N Q UA NTITA T1VE BIOLO G Y Founded in 1933 by REGINALD G. HARRIS Director of the Biological Laboratory 1924 to 1936 Volume I (1933).Surface Phenomena Volume II (1934) Aspects of Growth Volume III (1935) Photochemical Reactions Volume IV (1936) Excitation Phenomena Volume V (1937) Internal Secretions Volume VI (1938) Protein Chemistry Volume VII (1939) Biological Oxidations Volume VIII (1940) Permeability and the Nature of Cell Membranes Volume IX (1941) Genes and Chromosomes: Structure and Organization Volume X (1942) The Relation of Hormones to Development Volume XI (1946) Heredity and Variation in Microorganisms Volume XII (1947) Nucleic Acids and Nucleoproteins Volume XIII (1948) Biological Applications of Tracer Elements Volume XIV (1949) Amino Acids and Proteins Volume XV (1950) Origin and Evolution of Man Volume XVI (1951) Genes and Mutations Volume XVII (1952) The Neuron Volume XVIII (1953) Viruses Volume XIX (1954) The Mammalian Fetus: Physiological Aspects of Development Volume XX (1955) Population Genetics: The Nature and Causes of Genetic Variability in Population Volume XXI (1956) Genetic Mechanisms: Structure and Function Volume XXII (1957) Population Studies: Animal Ecology and Demography Volume XXIII (1958) Exchange of Genetic Material: Mechanism and Consequences Volume XXIV (1959) Genetics and Twentieth Century Darwinism Volume XXV (1960) Biological Clocks Volume XXVI (1961) Cellular Regulatory Mechanisms Volume XXVII (1962) Basic
    [Show full text]
  • Biochemistrystanford00kornrich.Pdf
    University of California Berkeley Regional Oral History Office University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California Program in the History of the Biosciences and Biotechnology Arthur Kornberg, M.D. BIOCHEMISTRY AT STANFORD, BIOTECHNOLOGY AT DNAX With an Introduction by Joshua Lederberg Interviews Conducted by Sally Smith Hughes, Ph.D. in 1997 Copyright 1998 by The Regents of the University of California Since 1954 the Regional Oral History Office has been interviewing leading participants in or well-placed witnesses to major events in the development of Northern California, the West, and the Nation. Oral history is a method of collecting historical information through tape-recorded interviews between a narrator with firsthand knowledge of historically significant events and a well- informed interviewer, with the goal of preserving substantive additions to the historical record. The tape recording is transcribed, lightly edited for continuity and clarity, and reviewed by the interviewee. The corrected manuscript is indexed, bound with photographs and illustrative materials, and placed in The Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley, and in other research collections for scholarly use. Because it is primary material, oral history is not intended to present the final, verified, or complete narrative of events. It is a spoken account, offered by the interviewee in response to questioning, and as such it is reflective, partisan, deeply involved, and irreplaceable. ************************************ All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreement between The Regents of the University of California and Arthur Kornberg, M.D., dated June 18, 1997. The manuscript is thereby made available for research purposes. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are reserved to The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction and Historical Perspective
    Chapter 1 Introduction and Historical Perspective “ Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. ” modified by the developmental history of the organism, Theodosius Dobzhansky its physiology – from cellular to systems levels – and by the social and physical environment. Finally, behaviors are shaped through evolutionary forces of natural selection OVERVIEW that optimize survival and reproduction ( Figure 1.1 ). Truly, the study of behavior provides us with a window through Behavioral genetics aims to understand the genetic which we can view much of biology. mechanisms that enable the nervous system to direct Understanding behaviors requires a multidisciplinary appropriate interactions between organisms and their perspective, with regulation of gene expression at its core. social and physical environments. Early scientific The emerging field of behavioral genetics is still taking explorations of animal behavior defined the fields shape and its boundaries are still being defined. Behavioral of experimental psychology and classical ethology. genetics has evolved through the merger of experimental Behavioral genetics has emerged as an interdisciplin- psychology and classical ethology with evolutionary biol- ary science at the interface of experimental psychology, ogy and genetics, and also incorporates aspects of neuro- classical ethology, genetics, and neuroscience. This science ( Figure 1.2 ). To gain a perspective on the current chapter provides a brief overview of the emergence of definition of this field, it is helpful
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Albert Lasker Nomination Form
    albert and mary lasker foundation 110 East 42nd Street Suite 1300 New York, ny 10017 November 3, 2003 tel 212 286-0222 fax 212 286-0924 Greetings: www.laskerfoundation.org james w. fordyce On behalf of the Albert and Mary Lasker Foundation, I invite you to submit a nomination Chairman neen hunt, ed.d. for the 2004 Albert Lasker Medical Research Awards. President mrs. anne b. fordyce The Awards will be offered in three categories: Basic Medical Research, Clinical Medical Vice President Research, and Special Achievement in Medical Science. This is the 59th year of these christopher w. brody Treasurer awards. Since the program was first established in 1944, 68 Lasker Laureates have later w. michael brown Secretary won Nobel Prizes. Additional information on previous Lasker Laureates can be found jordan u. gutterman, m.d. online at our web site http://www.laskerfoundation.org. Representative Albert Lasker Medical Research Awards Program Nominations that have been made in previous years may be updated and resubmitted in purnell w. choppin, m.d. accordance with the instructions on page 2 of this nomination booklet. daniel e. koshland, jr., ph.d. mrs. william mccormick blair, jr. the honorable mark o. hatfied Nominations should be received by the Foundation no later than February 2, 2004. Directors Emeritus A distinguished panel of jurors will select the scientists to be honored. The 2004 Albert Lasker Medical Research Awards will be presented at a luncheon ceremony given by the Foundation in New York City on Friday, October 1, 2004. Sincerely, Joseph L. Goldstein, M.D. Chairman, Awards Jury Albert Lasker Medical Research Awards ALBERT LASKER MEDICAL2004 RESEARCH AWARDS PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION OF THE AWARDS The major purpose of these Awards is to recognize and honor individuals who have made signifi- cant contributions in basic or clinical research in diseases that are the main cause of death and disability.
    [Show full text]
  • From the President's Desk
    JAN/FEB 2006 From the President’s desk: 2006, the 75th anniversary of the Genetics Society of America, will be marked by a number of initiatives to reinvigorate the Society’s mission of promoting research and education in genetics. A highlight was the recently held GSA sponsored conference, “Genetic Analysis: From Model Organisms to Human Biology” in San Diego from January 5-7. This conference emphasized the importance of model organism research by illustrating the crucial contributions to human biology resulting from discoveries in these organisms. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) supported this conference both financially and by participation of key NIH administrators, including Jeremy M. Berg, director of the National Institute of General Medical Sciences. In addition to the superb science talks by international leaders the MOHB conference showcased other important and new GSA initiatives including education, public policy advocacy, graduate student support and recognition of outstanding model organism geneticists. Robin Wright, Education Committee chair, led a round table discussion on undergraduate education and the Joint Steering Committee for Public Policy and the Congressional Liaison Committee sponsored a session on science advocacy and public policy. There was a mentor lunch to support graduate students and postdocs in the next steps of their careers, and the three GSA medals were presented during the banquet, with Victor Ambros receiving the GSA Medal, Fred Sherman the Beadle Award, and Masatoshi Nei the Morgan Award. (For research highlights at the meeting, see pages 6 and 7 of this issue.) The 75th anniversary will also usher in changes to our society’s journal, GENETICS.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetics Society News
    July 2008 . ISSUE 59 GENETICS SOCIETY NEWS www.genetics.org.uk IN THIS ISSUE Genetics Society News is edited by Steve Russell. Items for future issues should be sent to Steve Russell, preferably by email to • Genetics Society Epigenetics Meeting [email protected], or hard copy to Department of Genetics, • Genetics Society Sponsored Meetings University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EH. The Newsletter is published twice a year, with copy dates of 1st June and • Travel, Fieldwork and Studentship Reports 26th November. • John Evans: an Appreciation Cocoons of the parasitoid wasp Cotesia vestalis on cabbage leaf in Taiwan. From the • Twelve Galton Lectures fieldwork report by Jetske G. de Boer on page 36. • My Favourite Paper A WORD FROM THE EDITOR A word from the editor ow soon until the $1000 based on the results of tests we genome is actually with barely understand! Here in the Hus and individual UK there is currently a sequencing is widespread? The moratorium, adhered to by publication of increasing most insurers, on the use of numbers of individual human genetic testing information for genome sequences suggests assessing life insurance that we should start to consider applications. It is important some of the implications that this remains in place and associated with the availability its effectiveness is reviewed of personal genetic well before the current information. In this issue we moratorium expires in 2011. present two articles reflecting The Human Genetics on his issue: a report from a Commission Genetics Society sponsored (http://www.hgc.gov.uk) meeting recently held in monitor issues relating to Cambridge organised by The genetic discrimination in the Triple Helix, an international UK and are a point of contact undergraduate organisation, as for those with any concerns in the Millennium Technology Prize.
    [Show full text]
  • Moore Noller
    2002 Ada Doisy Lectures Ada Doisy Lecturers 2003 in BIOCHEMISTRY Sponsored by the Department of Biochemistry • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Dr. Peter B. 1970-71 Charles Huggins* and Elwood V. Jensen A76 1972-73 Paul Berg* and Walter Gilbert* Moore 1973-74 Saul Roseman and Bruce Ames Department of Molecular carbonyl Biophysics & Biochemistry Phe 1974-75 Arthur Kornberg* and Osamu Hayaishi Yale University C75 1976-77 Luis F. Leloir* New Haven, Connecticutt 1977-78 Albert L. Lehninger and Efraim Racker 2' OH attacking 1978-79 Donald D. Brown and Herbert Boyer amino N3 Tyr 1979-80 Charles Yanofsky A76 4:00 p.m. A2486 1980-81 Leroy E. Hood Thursday, May 1, 2003 (2491) 1983-84 Joseph L. Goldstein* and Michael S. Brown* Medical Sciences Auditorium 1984-85 Joan Steitz and Phillip Sharp* Structure and Function in 1985-86 Stephen J. Benkovic and Jeremy R. Knowles the Large Ribosomal Subunit 1986-87 Tom Maniatis and Mark Ptashne 1988-89 J. Michael Bishop* and Harold E. Varmus* 1989-90 Kurt Wüthrich Dr. Harry F. 1990-91 Edmond H. Fischer* and Edwin G. Krebs* 1993-94 Bert W. O’Malley Noller 1994-95 Earl W. Davie and John W. Suttie Director, Center for Molecular Biology of RNA 1995-96 Richard J. Roberts* University of California, Santa Cruz 1996-97 Ronald M. Evans Santa Cruz, California 1998-99 Elizabeth H. Blackburn 1999-2000 Carl R. Woese and Norman R. Pace 2000-01 Willem P. C. Stemmer and Ronald W. Davis 2001-02 Janos K. Lanyi and Sir John E. Walker* 12:00 noon 2002-03 Peter B.
    [Show full text]
  • Barbara Mcclintock
    Barbara McClintock Lee B. Kass and Paul Chomet Abstract Barbara McClintock, pioneering plant geneticist and winner of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1983, is best known for her discovery of transposable genetic elements in corn. This chapter provides an overview of many of her key findings, some of which have been outlined and described elsewhere. We also provide a new look at McClintock’s early contributions, based on our readings of her primary publications and documents found in archives. We expect the reader will gain insight and appreciation for Barbara McClintock’s unique perspective, elegant experiments and unprecedented scientific achievements. 1 Introduction This chapter is focused on the scientific contributions of Barbara McClintock, pioneering plant geneticist and winner of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1983 for her discovery of transposable genetic elements in corn. Her enlightening experiments and discoveries have been outlined and described in a number of papers and books, so it is not the aim of this report to detail each step in her scientific career and personal life but rather highlight many of her key findings, then refer the reader to the original reports and more detailed reviews. We hope the reader will gain insight and appreciation for Barbara McClintock’s unique perspective, elegant experiments and unprecedented scientific achievements. Barbara McClintock (1902–1992) was born in Hartford Connecticut and raised in Brooklyn, New York (Keller 1983). She received her undergraduate and graduate education at the New York State College of Agriculture at Cornell University. In 1923, McClintock was awarded the B.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Departments of Pathology and Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Room L235, Stanford, CA 94305-5324, USA
    GENE SILENCING BY DOUBLE STRANDED RNA Nobel Lecture, December 8, 2006 by Andrew Z. Fire Departments of Pathology and Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Room L235, Stanford, CA 94305-5324, USA. I would like to thank the Nobel Assembly of the Karolinska Institutet for the opportunity to describe some recent work on RNA-triggered gene silencing. First a few disclaimers, however. Telling the full story of gene silencing would be a mammoth enterprise that would take me many years to write and would take you well into the night to read. So we’ll need to abbreviate the story more than a little. Second (and as you will see) we are only in the dawn of our knowledge; so consider the following to be primer... the best we could do as of December 8th, 2006. And third, please understand that the story that I am telling represents the work of several generations of biologists, chemists, and many shades in between. I’m pleased and proud that work from my labo- ratory has contributed to the field, and that this has led to my being chosen as one of the messengers to relay the story in this forum. At the same time, I hope that there will be no confusion of equating our modest contributions with those of the much grander RNAi enterprise. DOUBLE STRANDED RNA AS A BIOLOGICAL ALARM SIGNAL These disclaimers in hand, the story can now start with a biography of the first main character. Double stranded RNA is probably as old (or almost as old) as life on earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 84 of the Genetics Society Newsletter
    JANUARY 2021 | ISSUE 84 GENETICS SOCIETY NEWS In this issue The Genetics Society News is edited by • Non-canonical Careers: Thinking Outside the Box of Academia and Industry Margherita Colucci and items for future • Celebrating the 35th anniversary of DNA fingerprinting issues can be sent to the editor by email • Genetics Society Summer Studentship Workshop 2020 to [email protected]. • 2020 Heredity best student-led paper prize winners The Newsletter is published twice a year, • Industrious Science: interview with Dr Paul Lavin with copy dates of July and January. Celebrating students’ achievements: 2020 Genetics Society Summer Studentship Workshop, 2020 Heredity best student-led paper prize. Page 30 A WORD FROM THE EDITOR A word from the editor Welcome to Issue 84 elcome to the latest issue of the Thinking Outside the Box of WGenetics Society Newsletter! Academia and Industry”. This little This issue is packed with great news vade mecum for careers in genetics of achievements and good science. The collects inspiring interviews led first Genetics Society virtual workshop by our very own Postgraduate for the 2020 Summer studentship saw Representative, Emily Baker. In exceptional contributions from the Emily’s words, these experiences attending students. You can read more “demonstrate how a PhD in genetics about participants’ experiences in the can be a platform for a career in just interviews with the talk’s winners in about anything. Pursuing a career the Feature section. in academia, industry, publishing or science communication could be for Many more prizes were awarded: you, but so could many others. Why Heredity journal announced the not take a career path less travelled 2020 Heredity best student-led paper by, it might make all the difference?” winners, and James Burgon’s Heredity podcast dedicated an episode to the Enjoy! first prize winner, with insights from Best wishes, Heredity Editor-in-Chief, Barbara Margherita Colucci Mable.
    [Show full text]