Fiscal Year 1979 Was the Remote Sensing Centers at Universities in 25 States

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fiscal Year 1979 Was the Remote Sensing Centers at Universities in 25 States Aeronautics and Space Report of the President 1979 Activities NOTE TO READERS: ALL PRINTED PAGES ARE INCLUDED, UNNUMBERED BLANK PAGES DURING SCANNING AND QUALITY CONTROL CHECK HAVE BEEN DELETED Aeronautics and Space Report of the President 1979 Activities National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, D.C. 20546 Table of Contents Page Page I . Summary of the US. Aeronautics and VI . Department of the Interior .............. 78 Space Activities of 1979 .............. 1 Introduction ........................ 78 Introduction .................... 1 Earth Resources Observation Communications ................ 1 Systems Program .................. 78 Earth’s Resources ............... 4 Monitoring the Environment ......... 80 Space Science .................. 10 Geology ............................ 81 Transportation ................. I3 Cartography ........................ 82 Space Energy ................... 18 International Activities .............. 82 I1. National Aeronautics and Space VI1 . Department of Transportation ........... 83 Administration ..................... 20 Introduction ....................... 83 Introduction ................... 20 Aviation Safety ..................... 83 Applications to Earth ........... 20 Air Traffic Control and Air Science ......................... 28 Navigation ....................... 85 Space Transportation ............ 35 Space Research and Technology . 39 Space Data Services .............. 42 Appendixes Aeronautical Research and Technology .................. 43 A-1 1J.S. Spacecraft Record .................. 87 111. Department of Defense .................. 48 A-2 World Record of Space Launchings Introduction ....................... 48 Successful in Attaining Earth Space Activities ..................... 48 Orbit or Beyond ...................... 87 Aeronautical Activities .............. 54 A-3 Successful U.S. Launchings-I979 ......... 88 Relationships with NASA ............ 59 B-1 U.S. Applications Satellites, 1975-1979 .... 92 IV. Department of Commerce ............... 62 B-2 US-Launched Scientific Payloads. Introduction ....................... 62 1975-1979 ............................ 93 Space Systems ...................... 62 B-3 U.S.-Launched Space Probes. 1975-1979 .... 94 Other Uses of Satellites and Space .... 69 C History of United States and Soviet Space Support Activities ............. 71 Manned Space Flights ................ 95 Space and Atmospheric Support ...... 72 D U.S. Space Launch Vehicles .............. 98 Aeronautical Programs .............. 72 E-1 Space Activities of the U.S. Government V. Department of Energy ................... 74 Historical Budget Summary-Budget Introduction ....................... 74 Authority ............................ 99 Progress in Space Applications E-2 Space Activities Budget .................. 100 of Nuclear Power ................. 74 Aeronautics Budget ..................... 100 Advances in Supporting Technology . 75 Status of Prior Missions .............. 76 F White House Statement on Management Satellite Power System ............... 76 of U.S. Civilian Remote Sensing Nuclear Waste Disposal .............. 76 Activities ............................. 101 Remote Sensing of Earth ........... 76 G The United Nations Moon Treaty- Nuclear Test Detection ............. 76 Text and 1J.S. Analysis ................ 103 iii cal flight characteristics at all speeds. V Summary of United States Aeronautics I and Space Activities in 1978 Introduction -Joint or coordinated civil/military activities where both parties’ objectives can be best In 1979 the United States programs in aeronautics met through this approach. and space made substantial technological and sci- -Separate defense activities which have no entific progress. In aeronautics, improvements in civilian counterpart.” The text of this an- engine components and systems promised reductions nouncement is reprinted as Appendix F. in fuel consumption, while improved computational Also in November, the United Nations completed and design techniques would provide aircraft de- action on a proposed treaty governing activities on signers with better design criteria. In space pro- the moon and other celestial bodies. The text of the grams, the Space Shuttle moved closer to its first treaty, together with United States commentary on orbital test flight, even as Voyager spacecraft flew some of its provisos, is given in Appendix G. past Jupiter and its spectacular moons and Pioneer In this summary chapter, highlights of 1979 in 11 became Earth’s first spacecraft to visit Saturn the national aeronautics and space programs are and its rings. United States expendable launch ve- organized topically across the government rather hicles attempted 16 launches; all were successful, than by agencies responsible for particular activities. placing a total of 18 payloads into orbit. The Na- Subsequent chapters further describe the activities tional Aeronautics and Space Administration of the agencies with the largest programs in aero- (NASA) in 8 launches orbited 8 payloads, includ- nautics and space. ing 2 for the Department of Defense (DoD) and 3 for its own program. DoD in 8 launches orbited 10 payloads, including a new Tiros-N-series meteoro- Communications logical satellite built by NASA for the Department of Commerce. Among the NASA satellites launched were the third and last of the big high-energy as- Communication satellites are among the most tronomy satellites and a satellite designed to survey profitable space systems to result from the nation’s the Earth’s magnetic field. investment in space activity. In Bern, Switzerland, and Vienna, Austria, the United States participated in the second and third Operational Space Systems sessions of talks with the Soviet Union on limita- tion of anti-satellite activity. The joint communique Intelsat. The internationally owned INTELSAT issued at the Vienna summit meeting stated that global communication satellite system now consists President Carter and President Brezhnev “agreed to of three active Intelsat IV-A satellites in the At- continue actively searching for mutually acceptable lantic Ocean region and two in the Indian Ocean agreement in the ongoing negotiations on anti- region. The Pacific Ocean region is served by space- satellite systems.” craft from the Intelsat IV series. Development of a follow-on generation, the Intelsat V, progressed, In November the President implemented a por- with launch of the first flight model projected for tion of the space policy decisions announced in mid-1980. Intelsat V will operate in both the 6-4 he designated the National Oceanic and 1978: gigahertz (GHz) and 11-14 GHz bands along with Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) of the De- the added flexibility of a “crowstrap” mode of partment of Commerce to be manager of all opera- operation (signal sent up to satellite on 6 GHz and tional civilian remote sensing activities from space. returned down from satellite on 11 GHz; and up on The decision provides three paths for the nation’s 14 GHz and down on GHz). Of the eight Intelsat space-based remote sensing: 4 V satellites under procurement, four will provide “-Integration of civilian operational activities maritime services. Those four satellites can be under NOAA. launched by any one of three vehicles: the Atlas- 1 Centaur, the NASA Space Shuttle, and the Euro- lation of Earth stations. The number of all Earth pean Space Agency’s Ariane. stations that have been authorized to date is in ex- Domestic Commercial Communication Satellites. cess of 2300. Westar 3, launched in September, brought the total Military Communications Satellites. Three broad number of domestic communication satellites to 8. categories of space communications are identified for These operate in the 4 and 6 GHz bands. Two are the defense establishment: part of RCA Americom’s SATCOM system, 3 are 0 worldwide point-to-point communications for in Western Union Telegraph’s WESTAR system, fixed users with high capacity and high data and 3 are in AT&T’s COMSTAR system. These rate satellites provide message toll service, television communications for mobile users, with moder- distribution, and single channel per carrier or mul- ate capacity and low data rate tiple channels per carrier for transmission of voice, 0 command and control of strategic nuclear data, television, and digital data. In July 1979, the forces. three-year ban on commercial usage of the AT&T DoD progressed in all three categories in 1979 COMSTAR system expired. Satellite Business Sys- with ( 1) the successful launch of Defense Satellite tems (SBS) continued its development efforts to- Communications System (DSCS) I1 satellites 13 and ward a two-satellite system. It plans to use the 12 14, (2) the successful launch of the second Fleet and 14 GHz bands and 5- and 7-meter Earth sta- Satellite Communications (FLTSATCOM) satellite, tions to provide voice, data, and television transmis- and (3) the achievement in May of the initial op- sion services to large industrial and government erating capability of the Air Force Satellite Com- users. The matter of construction of the SBS satel- munications system (AFSATCOM). The FCC is lite system is still before the U.S. Court of Appeals reviewing an application filed by Hughes Com- for the District of Columbia. Applications have been munication Services, Inc., to construct a satellite received from Western Union Space Communica- system known as LEASAT which will replace the tions, Inc. (SPACECOM) for an advanced Westar existing Fleet Satellite Communications (FLTSAT-
Recommended publications
  • A B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
    A B 1 Name of Satellite, Alternate Names Country of Operator/Owner 2 AcrimSat (Active Cavity Radiometer Irradiance Monitor) USA 3 Afristar USA 4 Agila 2 (Mabuhay 1) Philippines 5 Akebono (EXOS-D) Japan 6 ALOS (Advanced Land Observing Satellite; Daichi) Japan 7 Alsat-1 Algeria 8 Amazonas Brazil 9 AMC-1 (Americom 1, GE-1) USA 10 AMC-10 (Americom-10, GE 10) USA 11 AMC-11 (Americom-11, GE 11) USA 12 AMC-12 (Americom 12, Worldsat 2) USA 13 AMC-15 (Americom-15) USA 14 AMC-16 (Americom-16) USA 15 AMC-18 (Americom 18) USA 16 AMC-2 (Americom 2, GE-2) USA 17 AMC-23 (Worldsat 3) USA 18 AMC-3 (Americom 3, GE-3) USA 19 AMC-4 (Americom-4, GE-4) USA 20 AMC-5 (Americom-5, GE-5) USA 21 AMC-6 (Americom-6, GE-6) USA 22 AMC-7 (Americom-7, GE-7) USA 23 AMC-8 (Americom-8, GE-8, Aurora 3) USA 24 AMC-9 (Americom 9) USA 25 Amos 1 Israel 26 Amos 2 Israel 27 Amsat-Echo (Oscar 51, AO-51) USA 28 Amsat-Oscar 7 (AO-7) USA 29 Anik F1 Canada 30 Anik F1R Canada 31 Anik F2 Canada 32 Apstar 1 China (PR) 33 Apstar 1A (Apstar 3) China (PR) 34 Apstar 2R (Telstar 10) China (PR) 35 Apstar 6 China (PR) C D 1 Operator/Owner Users 2 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Government 3 WorldSpace Corp. Commercial 4 Mabuhay Philippines Satellite Corp. Commercial 5 Institute of Space and Aeronautical Science, University of Tokyo Civilian Research 6 Earth Observation Research and Application Center/JAXA Japan 7 Centre National des Techniques Spatiales (CNTS) Government 8 Hispamar (subsidiary of Hispasat - Spain) Commercial 9 SES Americom (SES Global) Commercial
    [Show full text]
  • Spies and Shuttles
    Spies and Shuttles University Press of Florida Florida A&M University, Tallahassee Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton Florida Gulf Coast University, Ft. Myers Florida International University, Miami Florida State University, Tallahassee New College of Florida, Sarasota University of Central Florida, Orlando University of Florida, Gainesville University of North Florida, Jacksonville University of South Florida, Tampa University of West Florida, Pensacola SPIE S AND SHUTTLE S NASA’s Secret Relationships with the DoD and CIA James E. David Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum, Washington, D.C., in association with University Press of Florida Gainesville · Tallahassee · Tampa · Boca Raton Pensacola · Orlando · Miami · Jacksonville · Ft. Myers · Sarasota Copyright 2015 by Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper All photographs courtesy of the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum. This book may be available in an electronic edition. 20 19 18 17 16 15 6 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data David, James E., 1951– author. Spies and shuttles : NASA’s secret relationships with the DOD and CIA / James David. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8130-4999-1 (cloth) ISBN 978-0-8130-5500-8 (ebook) 1. Astronautics—United States —History. 2. Astronautics, Military—Government policy—United States. 3. United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration—History. 4. United States. Department of Defense—History.
    [Show full text]
  • The Atmospheric Remote-Sensing Infrared Exoplanet Large-Survey
    ariel The Atmospheric Remote-Sensing Infrared Exoplanet Large-survey Towards an H-R Diagram for Planets A Candidate for the ESA M4 Mission TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... 1 2 Science Case ................................................................................................................ 3 2.1 The ARIEL Mission as Part of Cosmic Vision .................................................................... 3 2.1.1 Background: highlights & limits of current knowledge of planets ....................................... 3 2.1.2 The way forward: the chemical composition of a large sample of planets .............................. 4 2.1.3 Current observations of exo-atmospheres: strengths & pitfalls .......................................... 4 2.1.4 The way forward: ARIEL ....................................................................................... 5 2.2 Key Science Questions Addressed by Ariel ....................................................................... 6 2.3 Key Q&A about Ariel ................................................................................................. 6 2.4 Assumptions Needed to Achieve the Science Objectives ..................................................... 10 2.4.1 How do we observe exo-atmospheres? ..................................................................... 10 2.4.2 Targets available for ARIEL ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Desind Finding
    NATIONAL AIR AND SPACE ARCHIVES Herbert Stephen Desind Collection Accession No. 1997-0014 NASM 9A00657 National Air and Space Museum Smithsonian Institution Washington, DC Brian D. Nicklas © Smithsonian Institution, 2003 NASM Archives Desind Collection 1997-0014 Herbert Stephen Desind Collection 109 Cubic Feet, 305 Boxes Biographical Note Herbert Stephen Desind was a Washington, DC area native born on January 15, 1945, raised in Silver Spring, Maryland and educated at the University of Maryland. He obtained his BA degree in Communications at Maryland in 1967, and began working in the local public schools as a science teacher. At the time of his death, in October 1992, he was a high school teacher and a freelance writer/lecturer on spaceflight. Desind also was an avid model rocketeer, specializing in using the Estes Cineroc, a model rocket with an 8mm movie camera mounted in the nose. To many members of the National Association of Rocketry (NAR), he was known as “Mr. Cineroc.” His extensive requests worldwide for information and photographs of rocketry programs even led to a visit from FBI agents who asked him about the nature of his activities. Mr. Desind used the collection to support his writings in NAR publications, and his building scale model rockets for NAR competitions. Desind also used the material in the classroom, and in promoting model rocket clubs to foster an interest in spaceflight among his students. Desind entered the NASA Teacher in Space program in 1985, but it is not clear how far along his submission rose in the selection process. He was not a semi-finalist, although he had a strong application.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Artificial Satellites Launched in 1979
    This electronic version (PDF) was scanned by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) Library & Archives Service from an original paper document in the ITU Library & Archives collections. La présente version électronique (PDF) a été numérisée par le Service de la bibliothèque et des archives de l'Union internationale des télécommunications (UIT) à partir d'un document papier original des collections de ce service. Esta versión electrónica (PDF) ha sido escaneada por el Servicio de Biblioteca y Archivos de la Unión Internacional de Telecomunicaciones (UIT) a partir de un documento impreso original de las colecciones del Servicio de Biblioteca y Archivos de la UIT. (ITU) ﻟﻼﺗﺼﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻻﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﻓﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺤﻔﻮﻇﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﻗﺴﻢ ﺃﺟﺮﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﻀﻮﺋﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻤﺴﺢ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻧﺘﺎﺝ (PDF) ﺍﻹﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺨﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ .ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺤﻔﻮﻇﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﻗﺴﻢ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻮﻓﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﺛﺎﺋﻖ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺃﺻﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺭﻗﻴﺔ ﻭﺛﻴﻘﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻘﻼ ً◌ 此电子版(PDF版本)由国际电信联盟(ITU)图书馆和档案室利用存于该处的纸质文件扫描提供。 Настоящий электронный вариант (PDF) был подготовлен в библиотечно-архивной службе Международного союза электросвязи путем сканирования исходного документа в бумажной форме из библиотечно-архивной службы МСЭ. © International Telecommunication Union TELECOMMUNICATION JOURNAL - VOL. 47 - IV/1980 C0SM0S-1101 1979 42B MOLNYA-3 (11) 1979 4 A COSMOS-1102 1979 43 A MOLNYA-3 (12) 1979 48 A A COSMOS-1103 1979 45A D COSMOS-1104 1979 46 A ARIANE-6 1979 104A C0SM0S-1105 1979 52A DMSP-4 1979 50A N ARIEL-6 1979 47A COSMOS-1106 1979 54A DSCS-II 13 1979 98A AYAME 1979 9 A COSMOS-1107 1979 55A DSCS-II 14 1979 98B NOAA-6 1979 57A COSMOS-11 08 1979 56A D C0SM0S-1109 1979 58A F D COSM0S-1110 1979 60 A L.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Notes
    Current Notes Space Shuttle Special July 2011 Manchester Astronomical Society Page 1 Manchester Astronomical Society Page 2 Contents History Page 1 The Space Shuttle Atlantis/Carrier (Photo) Page 3 Space Shuttle Orbiter Page 4 Shuttle Orbiter Specifications Page 6 Shuttle Orbiter Cut-away (Diagram) Page 7 Shuttle-Mir Program Page 8 Hubble Servicing Mission 4 Page 10 Shuttle All Glass Cockpit Page 11 Shuttle Mission List Page 13 STS-135 Mission Reports Page 18 Shuttle Disasters Page 32 Mission Patches Page 34 The Future ? Page 36 If you wish to contribute to the next edition of current notes please send your article(s) to [email protected] Manchester Astronomical Society Page 3 Introduction Welcome to the special edition of Current Notes. This Edition has been compiled to celebrate 30years of Space Shuttle missions and to coincide with the last mission. NASA's greatest achievement was the creation of a reusable spacecraft. The Apollo spacecraft cost an astronomical sum to produce and were single-use only. The heat from Earth's atmosphere essentially disintegrated the shielding used to protect the spacecraft. The spacecraft also landed in the ocean, and the impact and sea water damaged the equipment. To remedy this, NASA built a spacecraft that had two rocket launchers attached to an external fuel tank and an orbiter module. They coated the spacecraft with protective heat-resistant ceramic tiles and changed the landing design to a glider-style. It took nine years of preparation, from 1972 to 1981, before the first mission. I would like to thank NASA/JPL and ESA for the information that has been compiled in this special edition.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Security Index 2013
    SPACE SECURITY INDEX 2013 www.spacesecurity.org 10th Edition SPACE SECURITY INDEX 2013 SPACESECURITY.ORG iii Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publications Data Space Security Index 2013 ISBN: 978-1-927802-05-2 FOR PDF version use this © 2013 SPACESECURITY.ORG ISBN: 978-1-927802-05-2 Edited by Cesar Jaramillo Design and layout by Creative Services, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada Cover image: Soyuz TMA-07M Spacecraft ISS034-E-010181 (21 Dec. 2012) As the International Space Station and Soyuz TMA-07M spacecraft were making their relative approaches on Dec. 21, one of the Expedition 34 crew members on the orbital outpost captured this photo of the Soyuz. Credit: NASA. Printed in Canada Printer: Pandora Print Shop, Kitchener, Ontario First published October 2013 Please direct enquiries to: Cesar Jaramillo Project Ploughshares 57 Erb Street West Waterloo, Ontario N2L 6C2 Canada Telephone: 519-888-6541, ext. 7708 Fax: 519-888-0018 Email: [email protected] Governance Group Julie Crôteau Foreign Aairs and International Trade Canada Peter Hays Eisenhower Center for Space and Defense Studies Ram Jakhu Institute of Air and Space Law, McGill University Ajey Lele Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses Paul Meyer The Simons Foundation John Siebert Project Ploughshares Ray Williamson Secure World Foundation Advisory Board Richard DalBello Intelsat General Corporation Theresa Hitchens United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research John Logsdon The George Washington University Lucy Stojak HEC Montréal Project Manager Cesar Jaramillo Project Ploughshares Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE PAGE 1 Acronyms and Abbreviations PAGE 5 Introduction PAGE 9 Acknowledgements PAGE 10 Executive Summary PAGE 23 Theme 1: Condition of the space environment: This theme examines the security and sustainability of the space environment, with an emphasis on space debris; the potential threats posed by near-Earth objects; the allocation of scarce space resources; and the ability to detect, track, identify, and catalog objects in outer space.
    [Show full text]
  • Sp-2006-4702-Endmatter.Pdf
    SECTION VII POSTSCRIPT ~ AFTERWORD: COMMUNITY AND eXPLANATION IN SPACE HISTORY (?) Martin collins The deep significance of certain problems for the advance of mathematical science in general and the important role which they play in the work of the individual investigator are not to be denied. As long as a branch of science offers an abun- dance of problems, so long is it alive; a lack of problems foreshadows extinction or the cessation of independent development. Just as every human undertaking pursues certain objects, so also mathematical research requires its problems. It is by the solution of problems that the investigator tests the temper of his steel; he finds new methods and new outlooks, and gains a wider and freer horizon. —David Hilbert, “Mathematical Problems,” 1900 ilbert, a pivotal figure in mathematics in the late 19th and early 20th cen- Hturies, addressed these thoughts in 1900 to the International Congress of Mathematicians in Paris—a quadrennial, premier gathering of practitio- ners.1 In this year, poised at the crossing between centuries, Hilbert and his colleagues self-consciously took stock as to professional ethos, standards, and research. Holding center stage, Hilbert presented (in what was recognized then and since as) one of the most significant templates for research in math- ematics, providing a conceptual outlook for his discipline and a list of 23 out- standing problems that engaged, in different ways, the foundations of the field. These problems, for Hilbert, served as vital links among practice, theory, and tacit notions of professional community—and, more broadly, connected all of these to european culture.
    [Show full text]
  • <> CRONOLOGIA DE LOS SATÉLITES ARTIFICIALES DE LA
    1 SATELITES ARTIFICIALES. Capítulo 5º Subcap. 10 <> CRONOLOGIA DE LOS SATÉLITES ARTIFICIALES DE LA TIERRA. Esta es una relación cronológica de todos los lanzamientos de satélites artificiales de nuestro planeta, con independencia de su éxito o fracaso, tanto en el disparo como en órbita. Significa pues que muchos de ellos no han alcanzado el espacio y fueron destruidos. Se señala en primer lugar (a la izquierda) su nombre, seguido de la fecha del lanzamiento, el país al que pertenece el satélite (que puede ser otro distinto al que lo lanza) y el tipo de satélite; este último aspecto podría no corresponderse en exactitud dado que algunos son de finalidad múltiple. En los lanzamientos múltiples, cada satélite figura separado (salvo en los casos de fracaso, en que no llegan a separarse) pero naturalmente en la misma fecha y juntos. NO ESTÁN incluidos los llevados en vuelos tripulados, si bien se citan en el programa de satélites correspondiente y en el capítulo de “Cronología general de lanzamientos”. .SATÉLITE Fecha País Tipo SPUTNIK F1 15.05.1957 URSS Experimental o tecnológico SPUTNIK F2 21.08.1957 URSS Experimental o tecnológico SPUTNIK 01 04.10.1957 URSS Experimental o tecnológico SPUTNIK 02 03.11.1957 URSS Científico VANGUARD-1A 06.12.1957 USA Experimental o tecnológico EXPLORER 01 31.01.1958 USA Científico VANGUARD-1B 05.02.1958 USA Experimental o tecnológico EXPLORER 02 05.03.1958 USA Científico VANGUARD-1 17.03.1958 USA Experimental o tecnológico EXPLORER 03 26.03.1958 USA Científico SPUTNIK D1 27.04.1958 URSS Geodésico VANGUARD-2A
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Background for IXPE
    A Study of background for IXPE F. Xiea,∗, R. Ferrazzolia, P. Soffittaa, S. Fabiania, E. Costaa, F. Muleria, A. Di Marcoa aINAF-IAPS, via del Fosso del Cavaliere 100, I-00133 Roma, Italy Abstract Focal plane X-ray polarimetry is intended for relatively bright sources with a negligible impact of background. However this might not be always possible for IXPE (Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer) when observing faint extended sources like supernova remnants. We present for the first time the expected background of IXPE by Monte Carlo simulation and its impact on real observations of point and extended X-ray sources. The simulation of background has been performed by Monte Carlo based on GEANT4 framework. The spacecraft and the detector units have been modeled, and the expected background components in IXPE orbital environment have been evaluated. We studied different background rejection techniques based on the analysis of the tracks collected by the Gas Pixel Detectors on board IXPE. The estimated background is about 2.9 times larger than the requirement, yet it is still negligible when observing point like sources. Albeit small, the impact on supernova remnants indicates the need for a background subtraction for the observation of the extended sources. Keywords: X-Ray, polarimeter, background 1. Introduction 16.1% ± 1.4% at 160:2° ± 2:6°, with a 10 standard deviation significance in six days observation. Furthermore, [6] reported The Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE) is a NASA with the same polarimeter the polarization measurement of the Astrophysics Small Explorer (SMEX) mission, selected in Jan- Crab nebula without pulsar contamination, resulting on a po- uary 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • China Dream, Space Dream: China's Progress in Space Technologies and Implications for the United States
    China Dream, Space Dream 中国梦,航天梦China’s Progress in Space Technologies and Implications for the United States A report prepared for the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission Kevin Pollpeter Eric Anderson Jordan Wilson Fan Yang Acknowledgements: The authors would like to thank Dr. Patrick Besha and Dr. Scott Pace for reviewing a previous draft of this report. They would also like to thank Lynne Bush and Bret Silvis for their master editing skills. Of course, any errors or omissions are the fault of authors. Disclaimer: This research report was prepared at the request of the Commission to support its deliberations. Posting of the report to the Commission's website is intended to promote greater public understanding of the issues addressed by the Commission in its ongoing assessment of U.S.-China economic relations and their implications for U.S. security, as mandated by Public Law 106-398 and Public Law 108-7. However, it does not necessarily imply an endorsement by the Commission or any individual Commissioner of the views or conclusions expressed in this commissioned research report. CONTENTS Acronyms ......................................................................................................................................... i Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... iii Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1
    [Show full text]
  • The Historyof Spaceflight
    CHAPTER15 THEHISTORY AND HISTORIOGRAPHYOF NATIONALSECURITY SPACE’ Stephen B. Johnson e intent of this essay is to provide space historians with an overview of Th.the issues and sources of national security space so as to identify those areas that have been underserved. Frequently, ballistic missiles are left out of space history, as they only pass through space instead of remaining in space like satellites. I include ballistic missiles for several reasons, not the least of which is that they pass through space en route to their targets. Space programs originated in the national security (NS) arena, and except for a roughly 15-year period from the early 1960s through the mid-l970s, NS space expenditures in the United States (U.S.), let alone the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), have equaled or exceeded those of civilian pro- grams. Despite this reality, the public nature of government-dominated civil- ian programs and issues of security classifications have kept NS space out of the limelight. The recent declassification of the early history of the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) and the demise of the Soviet Union have led to a recent spate of publications that have uncovered much of the “secret history” of the early Cold War. Nonetheless, much of NS space history has received little attention from historians. One feature of military organizations that is of great value for historians is their penchant to document their histories, and space organizations are no exception. Most military organizations have historians assigned to them, with professional historians at many of the positions documenting events as they occur.
    [Show full text]