DOCSLIB.ORG

The Atmospheric Remote-Sensing Infrared Exoplanet Large-Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Atmospheric Remote-Sensing Infrared Exoplanet Large-Survey ariel The Atmospheric Remote-Sensing Infrared Exoplanet Large-survey Towards an H-R Diagram for Planets A Candidate for the ESA M4 Mission TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... 1 2 Science Case ................................................................................................................ 3 2.1 The ARIEL Mission as Part of Cosmic Vision .................................................................... 3 2.1.1 Background: highlights & limits of current knowledge of planets ....................................... 3 2.1.2 The way forward: the chemical composition of a large sample of planets .............................. 4 2.1.3 Current observations of exo-atmospheres: strengths & pitfalls .......................................... 4 2.1.4 The way forward: ARIEL ....................................................................................... 5 2.2 Key Science Questions Addressed by Ariel ....................................................................... 6 2.3 Key Q&A about Ariel ................................................................................................. 6 2.4 Assumptions Needed to Achieve the Science Objectives ..................................................... 10 2.4.1 How do we observe exo-atmospheres? ..................................................................... 10 2.4.2 Targets available for ARIEL ................................................................................... 11 2.5 Expected Scientific Results ........................................................................................ 12 2.5.1 Tens of molecules, hundreds of planets, thousands of spectra… ...................................... 12 2.5.2 Chemical composition & evolution of gaseous planets ................................................... 12 2.5.3 Formation of gaseous planets ................................................................................. 15 2.5.4 Formation & evolution of terrestrial-type planets ........................................................ 15 3 Scientific Requirements ................................................................................................ 16 3.1 Wavelength coverage & Spectral resolving power ............................................................. 16 3.2 Optimised retrieval of molecular species & thermal profiles ................................................ 18 3.2.1 Transit spectra ................................................................................................... 18 3.2.2 Eclipse spectra ................................................................................................... 19 3.2.3 Observing strategy ............................................................................................. 20 3.3 The ARIEL Target Sample ......................................................................................... 20 3.4 Dealing with systematic & astrophysical noise .................................................................. 21 3.4.1 ARIEL performances requirements ......................................................................... 21 3.4.2 Correcting for stellar activity ................................................................................. 21 4 Proposed Science Payload ............................................................................................. 24 4.1 Payload Module Architecture ..................................................................................... 24 4.1.1 Deliverable Units Definition .................................................................................. 24 4.1.2 Payload Module Layout ........................................................................................ 25 4.1.3 Payload Optical Bench Design ................................................................................ 25 4.1.4 Payload Module Thermal Architecture ..................................................................... 25 4.2 Telescope Design .................................................................................................... 27 4.2.1 Optical Design .................................................................................................. 27 4.2.2 Manufacturing Plan ............................................................................................. 27 4.2.3 Alignment and Verification ................................................................................... 27 4.2.4 Structure & Baffles.............................................................................................. 29 4.2.5 Telescope Thermal Management ............................................................................ 29 4.3 Spectrometer Design ................................................................................................ 29 4.3.1 Optical Design .................................................................................................. 29 4.3.2 MIR-Spec Detector Selection ................................................................................ 31 4.4 Fine Guidance System / NIR Photometer Design ............................................................. 32 4.4.1 Design Concept ................................................................................................. 32 4.4.2 Use of FGS as WFE Sensor.................................................................................... 33 4.4.3 FGS Control Electronics & Software ........................................................................ 33 4.5 Instrument Electronics .............................................................................................. 34 4.5.1 Electrical Architecture ......................................................................................... 34 4.5.2 Detector Readout Schemes ................................................................................... 34 4.5.3 Payload Power Budget ......................................................................................... 35 4.5.4 Payload Data Rate .............................................................................................. 35 The ARIEL Mission Proposal Page ii 4.5.5 Telescope Control Electronics ............................................................................... 35 4.6 Calibration Scheme .................................................................................................. 36 4.6.1 Ground Verification, Calibration and Performance testing ............................................. 36 4.6.2 In-flight Calibration ............................................................................................ 36 4.7 Payload Constraints on System .................................................................................... 37 4.7.1 Pointing Stability ................................................................................................ 37 4.7.2 Cleanliness and Contamination Control .................................................................... 37 4.8 Predicting Payload Performance .................................................................................. 37 4.9 Payload Technology Readiness Assessment and Development Plans ....................................... 38 4.9.1 Baseline Payload Design TRL Levels ........................................................................ 38 4.9.2 Model philosophy ............................................................................................... 38 5 Proposed Mission and Spacecraft Configuration ................................................................... 40 5.1 Orbit ................................................................................................................... 40 5.2 Launcher .............................................................................................................. 40 5.3 Mission Concept ..................................................................................................... 41 5.3.1 Observing Modes ............................................................................................... 41 5.3.2 Pointing Constraints & Sky Coverage ....................................................................... 41 5.4 Spacecraft Design Concept ......................................................................................... 41 5.5 Critical Resource Budgets .......................................................................................... 42 5.6 Spacecraft Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) Assessment ................................................. 43 6 Management Scheme ................................................................................................... 45 6.1 Consortium Provided Elements ................................................................................... 45 6.2 ESA Provided Elements ............................................................................................ 46 6.3 Development Schedule ............................................................................................. 47 6.4 Ground Segment Provision ........................................................................................ 47 6.4.1 Ground Segment Architecture ............................................................................... 47 6.5 Data Release and Exploitation Policy ............................................................................ 48 6.6 Public Relations and Outreach ...................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Michael Garcia Hubble Space Telescope Users Committee (STUC)
    Hubble Space Telescope Users Committee (STUC) April 16, 2015 Michael Garcia HST Program Scientist [email protected] 1 Hubble Sees Supernova Split into Four Images by Cosmic Lens 2 NASA’s Hubble Observations suggest Underground Ocean on Jupiter’s Largest Moon Ganymede file:///Users/ file:///Users/ mrgarci2/Desktop/mrgarci2/Desktop/ hs-2015-09-a-hs-2015-09-a- web.jpg web.jpg 3 NASA’s Hubble detects Distortion of Circumstellar Disk by a Planet 4 The Exoplanet Travel Bureau 5 TESS Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite CURRENT STATUS: • Downselected April 2013. • Major partners: - PI and science lead: MIT - Project management: NASA GSFC - Instrument: Lincoln Laboratory - Spacecraft: Orbital Science Corp • Agency launch readiness date NLT June 2018 (working launch date August 2017). • High-Earth elliptical orbit (17 x 58.7 Earth radii). Standard Explorer (EX) Mission PI: G. Ricker (MIT) • Development progressing on plan. Mission: All-Sky photometric exoplanet - Systems Requirement Review (SRR) mapping mission. successfully completed on February Science goal: Search for transiting 12-13, 2014. exoplanets around the nearby, bright stars. Instruments: Four wide field of view (24x24 - Preliminary Design Review (PDR) degrees) CCD cameras with overlapping successfully completed Sept 9-12, 2014. field of view operating in the Visible-IR - Confirmation Review, for approval to enter spectrum (0.6-1 micron). implementation phase, successfully Operations: 3-year science mission after completed October 31, 2014. launch. - Mission CDR on track for August 2015 6 JWST Hardware Progress JWST remains on track for an October 2018 launch within its replan budget guidelines 7 WFIRST / AFTA Widefield Infrared Survey Telescope with Astrophysics Focused Telescope Assets Coronagraph Technology Milestones Widefield Detector Technology Milestones 1 Shaped Pupil mask fabricated with reflectivity of 7/21/14 1 Produce, test, and analyze 2 candidate 7/31/14 -4 10 and 20 µm pixel size.
    [Show full text]
  • SPACE RESEARCH in POLAND Report to COMMITTEE
    SPACE RESEARCH IN POLAND Report to COMMITTEE ON SPACE RESEARCH (COSPAR) 2020 Space Research Centre Polish Academy of Sciences and The Committee on Space and Satellite Research PAS Report to COMMITTEE ON SPACE RESEARCH (COSPAR) ISBN 978-83-89439-04-8 First edition © Copyright by Space Research Centre Polish Academy of Sciences and The Committee on Space and Satellite Research PAS Warsaw, 2020 Editor: Iwona Stanisławska, Aneta Popowska Report to COSPAR 2020 1 SATELLITE GEODESY Space Research in Poland 3 1. SATELLITE GEODESY Compiled by Mariusz Figurski, Grzegorz Nykiel, Paweł Wielgosz, and Anna Krypiak-Gregorczyk Introduction This part of the Polish National Report concerns research on Satellite Geodesy performed in Poland from 2018 to 2020. The activity of the Polish institutions in the field of satellite geodesy and navigation are focused on the several main fields: • global and regional GPS and SLR measurements in the frame of International GNSS Service (IGS), International Laser Ranging Service (ILRS), International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service (IERS), European Reference Frame Permanent Network (EPN), • Polish geodetic permanent network – ASG-EUPOS, • modeling of ionosphere and troposphere, • practical utilization of satellite methods in local geodetic applications, • geodynamic study, • metrological control of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) equipment, • use of gravimetric satellite missions, • application of GNSS in overland, maritime and air navigation, • multi-GNSS application in geodetic studies. Report
    [Show full text]
  • HD 97658 and Its Super-Earth Spitzer & MOST Transit Analysis and Seismic Modeling of the Host Star
    The space photometry revolution CoRoT3-KASC7 joint meeting HD 97658 and its super-Earth Spitzer & MOST transit analysis and seismic modeling of the host star Valerie Van Grootel (University of Liege, Belgium) M. Gillon (U. Liege), D. Valencia (U. Toronto), N. Madhusudhan (U. Cambridge), D. Dragomir (UC Santa Barbara), and the Spitzer team 1. Introducing HD 97658 and its super-Earth The second brightest star harboring a transiting super-Earth HD 97658 (V=7.7, K=5.7) HD 97658 b, a transiting super-Earth • • Teff = 5170 ± 50 K (Howard et al. 2011) Discovery by Howard et al. (2011) from Keck- Hires RVs: • [Fe/H] = -0.23 ± 0.03 ~ Z - M sin i = 8.2 ± 1.2 M • d = 21.11 ± 0.33 pc ; from Hipparcos P earth - P = 9.494 ± 0.005 d (Van Leeuwen 2007) orb • Transits discovered by Dragomir et al. (2013) with MOST: RP = 2.34 ± 0.18 Rearth From Howard et al. (2011) From Dragomir et al. (2013) Valerie Van Grootel – CoRoT/Kepler July 2014, Toulouse 2 2. Modeling the host star HD 97658 Rp α R* 2/3 Mp α M* Radial velocities Transits + the age of the star is the best proxy for the age of its planets (Sun: 4.57 Gyr, Earth: 4.54 Gyr) • With Asteroseismology: T. Campante, V. Van Eylen’s talks • Without Asteroseismology: stellar evolution modeling Valerie Van Grootel – CoRoT/Kepler July 2014, Toulouse 3 2. Modeling the host star HD 97658 • d = 21.11 ± 0.33 pc, V = 7.7 L* = 0.355 ± 0.018 Lsun • +Teff from spectroscopy: R* = 0.74 ± 0.03 Rsun • Stellar evolution code CLES (Scuflaire et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Asteroseismology with Corot, Kepler, K2 and TESS: Impact on Galactic Archaeology Talk Miglio’S
    Asteroseismology with CoRoT, Kepler, K2 and TESS: impact on Galactic Archaeology talk Miglio’s CRISTINA CHIAPPINI Leibniz-Institut fuer Astrophysik Potsdam PLATO PIC, Padova 09/2019 AsteroseismologyPlato as it is : a Legacy with CoRoT Mission, Kepler for Galactic, K2 and TESS: impactArchaeology on Galactic Archaeology talk Miglio’s CRISTINA CHIAPPINI Leibniz-Institut fuer Astrophysik Potsdam PLATO PIC, Padova 09/2019 Galactic Archaeology strives to reconstruct the past history of the Milky Way from the present day kinematical and chemical information. Why is it Challenging ? • Complex mix of populations with large overlaps in parameter space (such as Velocities, Metallicities, and Ages) & small volume sampled by current data • Stars move away from their birth places (migrate radially, or even vertically via mergers/interactions of the MW with other Galaxies). • Many are the sources of migration! • Most of information was confined to a small volume Miglio, Chiappini et al. 2017 Key: VOLUME COVERAGE & AGES Chiappini et al. 2018 IAU 334 Quantifying the impact of radial migration The Rbirth mix ! Stars that today (R_now) are in the green bins, came from different R0=birth Radial Migration Sources = bar/spirals + mergers + Inside-out formation (gas accretion) GalacJc Center Z Sun R Outer Disk R = distance from GC Minchev, Chiappini, MarJg 2013, 2014 - MCM I + II A&A A&A 558 id A09, A&A 572, id A92 Two ways to expand volume for GA • Gaia + complementary photometric information (but no ages for far away stars) – also useful for PIC! • Asteroseismology of RGs (with ages!) - also useful for core science PLATO (miglio’s talk) The properties at different places in the disk: AMR CoRoT, Gaia+, K2 + APOGEE Kepler, TESS, K2, Gaia CoRoT, Gaia+, K2 + APOGEE PLATO + 4MOST? Predicon: AMR Scatter increases towards outer regions Age scatter increasestowars outer regions ExtracGng the best froM GaiaDR2 - Anders et al.
    [Show full text]
  • LISA, the Gravitational Wave Observatory
    The ESA Science Programme Cosmic Vision 2015 – 25 Christian Erd Planetary Exploration Studies, Advanced Studies & Technology Preparations Division 04-10-2010 1 ESAESA spacespace sciencescience timelinetimeline JWSTJWST BepiColomboBepiColombo GaiaGaia LISALISA PathfinderPathfinder Proba-2Proba-2 PlanckPlanck HerschelHerschel CoRoTCoRoT HinodeHinode AkariAkari VenusVenus ExpressExpress SuzakuSuzaku RosettaRosetta DoubleDouble StarStar MarsMars ExpressExpress INTEGRALINTEGRAL ClusterCluster XMM-NewtonXMM-Newton CassiniCassini-H-Huygensuygens SOHOSOHO ImplementationImplementation HubbleHubble OperationalOperational 19901990 19941994 19981998 20022002 20062006 20102010 20142014 20182018 20222022 XMM-Newton • X-ray observatory, launched in Dec 1999 • Fully operational (lost 3 out of 44 X-ray CCD early in mission) • No significant loss of performances expected before 2018 • Ranked #1 at last extension review in 2008 (with HST & SOHO) • 320 refereed articles per year, with 38% in the top 10% most cited • Observing time over- subscribed by factor ~8 • 2,400 registered users • Largest X-ray catalogue (263,000 sources) • Best sensitivity in 0.2-12 keV range • Long uninterrupted obs. • Follow-up of SZ clusters 04-10-2010 3 INTEGRAL • γ-ray observatory, launched in Oct 2002 • Imager + Spectrograph (E/ΔE = 500) + X- ray monitor + Optical camera • Coded mask telescope → 12' resolution • 72 hours elliptical orbit → low background • P/L ~ nominal (lost 4 out 19 SPI detectors) • No serious degradation before 2016 • ~ 90 refereed articles per year • Obs
    [Show full text]
  • Epo in a Multinational Context
    →EPO IN A MULTINATIONAL CONTEXT Heidelberg, June 2013 ESA FACTS AND FIGURES • Over 40 years of experience • 20 Member States • Six establishments in Europe, about 2200 staff • 4 billion Euro budget (2013) • Over 70 satellites designed, tested and operated in flight • 17 scientific satellites in operation • Six types of launcher developed • Celebrated the 200th launch of Ariane in February 2011 2 ACTIVITIES ESA is one of the few space agencies in the world to combine responsibility in nearly all areas of space activity. • Space science • Navigation • Human spaceflight • Telecommunications • Exploration • Technology • Earth observation • Operations • Launchers 3 →SCIENCE & ROBOTIC EXPLORATION TODAY’S SCIENCE MISSIONS (1) • XMM-Newton (1999– ) X-ray telescope • Cluster (2000– ) four spacecraft studying the solar wind • Integral (2002– ) observing objects in gamma and X-rays • Hubble (1990– ) orbiting observatory for ultraviolet, visible and infrared astronomy (with NASA) • SOHO (1995– ) studying our Sun and its environment (with NASA) 5 TODAY’S SCIENCE MISSIONS (2) • Mars Express (2003– ) studying Mars, its moons and atmosphere from orbit • Rosetta (2004– ) the first long-term mission to study and land on a comet • Venus Express (2005– ) studying Venus and its atmosphere from orbit • Herschel (2009– ) far-infrared and submillimetre wavelength observatory • Planck (2009– ) studying relic radiation from the Big Bang 6 UPCOMING MISSIONS (1) • Gaia (2013) mapping a thousand million stars in our galaxy • LISA Pathfinder (2015) testing technologies
    [Show full text]
  • UK Space Agency Annual Report and Accounts 2018-19 HC2258
    Annual Report and Accounts 2018-19 HC 2258 Delivering an excellent space programme with the maximum economic, scientific and policy benefit for the UK UK Space Agency Annual Report and Accounts 2018-19 Presented to the House of Commons pursuant to section 7 of the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000. Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 4 July 2019. HC 2258 © Crown copyright 2019 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 Where we have identified any third-party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available on our website at: www.gov.uk/official-documents Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] ISBN 978-1-5286-1332-3 CCS0519290152 07/19 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Printed in the UK on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. UK SPACE AGENCY ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2018-19 CONTENTS PERFORMANCE REPORT Overview 6 Chief Executive’s statement 7 Highlights in 2018-19 8 About the UK Space Agency 11 What could stop us achieving our objectives? 12 Our finances 14 Our people 18 Performance Analysis 20 How we have performed 21 2018-19 performance in detail 27 Our plans for the future 37 ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT Audit Committee Chairman 39 Corporate Governance 40 Director’s Report 41 Statement of Accounting Officer’s responsibilities 45 Governance Statement 46 Remuneration and Staff Report 57 Parliamentary Accountability and Audit 69 The certificate and report of the Comptroller and Auditor General to the House of Commons 70 ACCOUNTS Financial Statements 76 Notes to the financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2019 80 Glossary 93 3 PERFORMANCE REPORT OVERVIEW 6 UK SPACE AGENCY ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2018-19 CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S STATEMENT Stevenage for an event that unveiled the winning name.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Missions for Exoplanet
    Space missions for exoplanet January 3, 2020 Source: The Hindu Manifest pedagogy: As a part of science & technology and geography, questions related to space have been asked both at prelims and mains stage. Finding life in other celestial bodies had always been a human curiosity. Origin of the solar system, exoplanets as prospective resources zone, finding life etc are key objectives of NASA and other space programs. In news: European Space Agency (ESA) has launched CHEOPS exoplanet mission Placing it in syllabus: Exoplanet space missions Static dimensions: What are exoplanets? Current dimensions: Exoplanet missions by NASA Exoplanet missions by ESA and CHEOPS mission Content: What are Exoplanets? The worlds orbiting other stars are called “exoplanets”. They vary in sizes, from gas giants larger than Jupiter to small, rocky planets about as big around as Earth. They can be hot enough to boil metal or locked in deep freeze. They can orbit two suns at once. Some exoplanets are sunless, wandering through the galaxy in permanent darkness. The first exoplanet invented was 51 Pegasi b, a “hot Jupiter” in 1995 which is 50 light-years away that is locked in a four-day orbit around its star. ((The discoverers Didier Queloz and Michel Mayor of 51 Pegasi b shared the 2019 Nobel Prize in Physics for their breakthrough finding)). And a system of three “pulsar planets” had been detected, beginning in 1992. The circumstellar habitable zone (CHZ) also called the Goldilocks zone is the range of orbits around a star within which a planetary surface can support liquid water given sufficient atmospheric pressure.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Spectra of Gamma-Ray Bursts at High Energies
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Doctoral Dissertations Student Scholarship Spring 1986 ON THE SPECTRA OF GAMMA-RAY BURSTS AT HIGH ENERGIES STEVEN MICHAEL MATZ University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation Recommended Citation MATZ, STEVEN MICHAEL, "ON THE SPECTRA OF GAMMA-RAY BURSTS AT HIGH ENERGIES" (1986). Doctoral Dissertations. 1483. https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/1483 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a manuscript sent to us for publication and microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to pho­ tograph and reproduce this manuscript, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. Pages in any manuscript may have indistinct print. In all cases the best available copy has been filmed. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. Manuscripts may not always be complete. When it is not possible to obtain missing pages, a note appears to indicate this. 2. When copyrighted materials are removed from the manuscript, a note ap­ pears to indicate this. 3. Oversize materials (maps, drawings, and charts) are photographed by sec­ tioning the original, beginning at the upper left hand comer and continu­ ing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Article (Pdf)
    244 Trimble, JAAVSO Volume 43, 2015 As International as They Would Let Us Be Virginia Trimble Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-4575; [email protected] Received July 15, 2015; accepted August 28, 2015 Abstract Astronomy has always crossed borders, continents, and oceans. AAVSO itself has roughly half its membership residing outside the USA. In this excessively long paper, I look briefly at ancient and medieval beginnings and more extensively at the 18th and 19th centuries, plunge into the tragedies associated with World War I, and then try to say something relatively cheerful about subsequent events. Most of the people mentioned here you will have heard of before (Eratosthenes, Copernicus, Kepler, Olbers, Lockyer, Eddington…), others, just as important, perhaps not (von Zach, Gould, Argelander, Freundlich…). Division into heroes and villains is neither necessary nor possible, though some of the stories are tragic. In the end, all one can really say about astronomers’ efforts to keep open channels of communication that others wanted to choke off is, “the best we can do is the best we can do.” 1. Introduction astronomy (though some of the practitioners were actually Christian and Jewish) coincided with the largest extents of Astronomy has always been among the most international of regions governed by caliphates and other Moslem empire-like sciences. Some of the reasons are obvious. You cannot observe structures. In addition, Arabic astronomy also drew on earlier the whole sky continuously from any one place. Attempts to Greek, Persian, and Indian writings. measure geocentric parallax and to observe solar eclipses have In contrast, the Europe of the 16th century, across which required going to the ends (or anyhow the middles) of the earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2008.02789V1 [Astro-Ph.EP] 6 Aug 2020 Common Planet Size; and Compact Multiple Planet Sys- Tems
    Draft version August 7, 2020 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX63 LOW ALBEDO SURFACES OF LAVA WORLDS Zahra Essack ,1, 2 Sara Seager ,1, 3, 4 and Mihkel Pajusalu 1, 5 1Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 2Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 3Department of Physics, and Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 4Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, MIT, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 5Tartu Observatory, University of Tartu, Observatooriumi 1, 61602 Toravere, Estonia (Accepted June 12, 2020) Submitted to ApJ ABSTRACT Hot super Earths are exoplanets with short orbital periods (< 10 days), heated by their host stars to temperatures high enough for their rocky surfaces to become molten. A few hot super Earths exhibit high geometric albedos (> 0.4) in the Kepler band (420-900 nm). We are motivated to determine whether reflection from molten lava and quenched glasses (a product of rapidly cooled lava) on the surfaces of hot super Earths contributes to the observationally inferred high geometric albedos. We experimentally measure reflection from rough and smooth textured quenched glasses of both basalt and feldspar melts. For lava reflectance values, we use specular reflectance values of molten silicates from non-crystalline solids literature. Integrating the empirical glass reflectance function and non-crystalline solids reflectance values over the dayside surface of the exoplanet at secondary eclipse yields an upper limit for the albedo of a lava-quenched glass planet surface of ∼0.1.
    [Show full text]
  • ARIEL – 13Th Appleton Space Conference PLANETS ARE UBIQUITOUS
    Background image credit NASA ARIEL – 13th Appleton Space Conference PLANETS ARE UBIQUITOUS OUR GALAXY IS MADE OF GAS, STARS & PLANETS There are at least as many planets as stars Cassan et al, 2012; Batalha et al., 2015; ARIEL – 13th Appleton Space Conference 2 EXOPLANETS TODAY: HUGE DIVERSITY 3700+ PLANETS, 2700 PLANETARY SYSTEMS KNOWN IN OUR GALAXY ARIEL – 13th Appleton Space Conference 3 HUGE DIVERSITY: WHY? FORMATION & EVOLUTION PROCESSES? MIGRATION? INTERACTION WITH STAR? Accretion Gaseous planets form here Interaction with star Planet migration Ices, dust, gas ARIEL – 13th Appleton Space Conference 4 STAR & PLANET FORMATION/EVOLUTION WHAT WE KNOW: CONSTRAINTS FROM OBSERVATIONS – HERSCHEL, ALMA, SOLAR SYSTEM Measured elements in Solar system ? Image credit ESA-Herschel, ALMA (ESO/NAOJ/NRAO), Marty et al, 2016; André, 2012; ARIEL – 13th Appleton Space Conference 5 THE SUN’S PLANETS ARE COLD SOME KEY O, C, N, S MOLECULES ARE NOT IN GAS FORM T ~ 150 K Image credit NASA Juno mission, NASA Galileo ARIEL – 13th Appleton Space Conference 6 WARM/HOT EXOPLANETS O, C, N, S (TI, VO, SI) MOLECULES ARE IN GAS FORM Atmospheric pressure 0.01Bar H2O gas CO2 gas CO gas CH4 gas HCN gas TiO gas T ~ 500-2500 K Condensates VO gas H2S gas 1 Bar Gases from interior ARIEL – 13th Appleton Space Conference 7 CHEMICAL MEASUREMENTS TODAY SPECTROSCOPIC OBSERVATIONS WITH CURRENT INSTRUMENTS (HUBBLE, SPITZER,SPHERE,GPI) • Precision of 20 ppm can be reached today by Hubble-WFC3 • Current data are sparse, instruments not absolutely calibrated • ~ 40 planets analysed
    [Show full text]