DOCSLIB.ORG

Species, Units of Evolution, and Secondary Substance a Thesis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Species, Units of Evolution, and Secondary Substance a Thesis Species, Units of Evolution, and Secondary Substance A thesis presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Daniel J. Molter June 2011 © 2011 Daniel J. Molter. All Rights Reserved. 2 This thesis titled Species, Units of Evolution, and Secondary Substance by DANIEL J. MOLTER has been approved for the Department of Philosophy and the College of Arts and Sciences by Arthur Zucker Associate Professor of Philosophy Benjamin M. Ogles Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 ABSTRACT MOLTER, DANIEL J., M.A., June 2011, Philosophy Species, Units of Evolution, and Secondary Substance Director ofThesis: Arthur Zucker Species are classes of organisms on the traditional view, but David Hull argues that species as units of evolution are better understood as individuals composed of organisms as their parts. Phillip Kitcher counters that evolutionary species are better understood as sets. Following Elliot Sober, I argue that constituent definition prohibits a set-theoretic interpretation of species. Following John Dupré, I argue that species and units of evolution are ontologically distinct entities that require different names. “Species” is the proper name of the species category, a class containing many intensionally-defined classes of organisms. The units of evolution that Hull describes are spatiotemporally-individuated physical objects. Following the principle of priority in biological nomenclature, Hull's transgenerational biological individual cannot be called "Species", because that name has a prior valid use. I argue that Hull's species-as- individual has a prior valid name which can be found in Aristotle's Categories. Organisms are members of species, but they are parts of Secondary Substances. Approved: _____________________________________________________________ Arthur Zucker Associate Professor of Philosophy 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract ............................................................................................................................... 3 Chapter 1: Historical Introduction ...................................................................................... 5 Chapter 2: Species as Individuals: A Critique of Hull ........................................................ 10 Chapter 3: Why Species are not Sets ................................................................................ 46 Chapter 4: Species as Units of Classification .................................................................... 54 Chapter 5: Units of Evolution as Substances .................................................................... 63 Chapter 6: Postscript on Species and Units of Evolution.................................................. 69 References ........................................................................................................................ 70 5 CHAPTER 1: HISTORICAL INTRODUCTION Until Darwin published The Origin of Species in 1859, scientific consensus held that species were unchanging natural kinds. Each organism was thought to share a common form characteristic of its species. An individual dog, for example, was thought to be an instantiation of the essence of dog in a particular quantity of matter. Being an instance of an essential form was taken as necessary and sufficient for membership in a species. The notion of species as immutable natural kinds has its origins in ancient Greek philosophy. Plato held that plants and animals on earth derived their being from participation in perfect eternal forms. All pine trees, for example, were thought to be reflections of the perfect form of pine tree that exists in an otherworldly immaterial realm of forms. On the Platonic view, the species 'pine tree' is the collection of all individuals that derive their essence from participation in the perfect unchanging form of pine tree. Aristotle also held that members of a species share a common essential form, but he rejected the Platonic notion of an immaterial realm of forms. The world itself is eternal on the Aristotelian view and the forms of plants and animals exist only in individual organisms. When plants and animals reproduce, their forms are copied in new matter, such that when an organism dies, its form does not perish but continues on, re- instantiated in the matter of its progeny. 6 Linnaeus inherited the Aristotelian notion of species as forms, but he modified the view to make it compatible with the Genesis story of creation. “We reckon the number of SPECIES as the number of different forms that were created in the beginning” (Linnaeus 1751, 157). For Linnaeus, species were collections of animals and plants descended without modification from a single pair of created ancestors. Linnaeus’s system of classification is a nested hierarchy of classes composed of five ranks: classes, orders, genera, species, and varieties (Linnaeus 1751, 155). The five ranks are based on the five categories of scholastic logical division: genus summum, genus intermedium, genus proximum, species, and individuum (Stafleu 1971, 28). Each rank in the hierarchy is related to the rank above it and to the rank below it by the genus-species relation. “The genus of the genera is the order, and the genus of the orders is the class” (Linnaeus 1751, 204). In this system of logical division, a genus is a general class of objects that possess common properties, and a species is a sub-division of the genus. Members of a species have all the properties required for membership in the genus, but they possess additional properties that differentiate them from other species in the genus. The genus-species relation is one of general sameness and specific difference. Though their views on species differ in important ways, Plato, Aristotle, and Linnaeus all held an essentialist species concept. That is, they all thought of species as collections of organisms sharing a common immutable form. On this view, the form of a thing is its essence, and it is the essence that determines what a thing is. Each thing can 7 have but a single essence, hence, every individual organism is a member of one and only one species. The goal of taxonomy under an essentialist species concept is to describe and catalog living things according to their essential forms (Popper 1950, Hull 1965, Mayr 1969, Lehmann 1971; in Stafleu 1971, 25). After Darwin's publication of The Origin of Species, the essentialist species concept became untenable. If one species can evolve into another, then the forms of living things do not remain constant from generation to generation. All essentialist accounts of species are refuted by the fact that gradual evolutionary processes cause the diversity of forms in nature. Essentialism was dead as a biological theory, but the concept of species did not fall with it. There are obviously specific kinds of plants and animals in nature, and that fact had to be explained in light of essentialism’s replacement by the theory of evolution. In 1942, Ernst Mayr gave an account that he called the biological species concept. "Species are groups of interbreeding natural populations that are reproductively isolated from other such groups." Mayr’s species concept avoids morphological essentialism by defining species in terms of relations between the members of a species. The forms of organisms in a species change over time in accordance with evolution, but the mating compatibility relation remains unchanged. Groups of organisms meet the conditions for membership in a biological species by maintaining reproductive compatibility in each generation of an evolving lineage. 8 Mayr's formulation captured the popular notion of what species are within the animal kingdom, but it had some weaknesses. It said nothing about species of asexual organisms that do not breed, and it was of little use for determining species of plants, which often form hybrids. Attempts to fill in the gaps left by the biological species concept resulted in the publication of more species concepts. By the late 20th century, over twenty different species concepts had appeared in journals of philosophy and biology (Mayden 1997). Widespread acceptance of evolutionary theory ended the reign of essentialism as the dominant scientific theory, and it spawned a plethora of other a species concepts. On the traditional view, all species concepts reduce to conditions for class membership. Species concepts fall into three broad categories: phenetic, cohesive, and monophyletic (Hey 2006). The three categories of species concepts are differentiated by the kinds of properties used as criteria for class membership. Phenetic species concepts compare the physical properties of organisms, cohesive species concepts consider relational properties, that is, how organisms relate to other organisms, and monophyletic species concepts rely on inferred properties, that is, organisms are segregated into species based on inferences about the history of their evolution. In 1976, David Hull challenged the traditional notion of species as classes, claiming instead that species are individuals. In this master’s thesis I defend the traditional notion of species as classes. In the next chapter I examine Hull’s arguments for conceiving of species as individuals, and I argue that Hull has presented a mix of 9 good and bad arguments. In the third chapter I consider Philip Kitcher’s claim that species are sets rather than individuals, and I argue that species cannot be sets. In chapter four I outline John
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Taxonomy of Primates in the Laboratory Context
    P0800261_01 7/14/05 8:00 AM Page 3 C HAPTER 1 The Taxonomy of Primates T HE T in the Laboratory Context AXONOMY OF P Colin Groves RIMATES School of Archaeology and Anthropology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia 3 What are species? D Taxonomy: EFINITION OF THE The biological Organizing nature species concept Taxonomy means classifying organisms. It is nowadays commonly used as a synonym for systematics, though Disagreement as to what precisely constitutes a species P strictly speaking systematics is a much broader sphere is to be expected, given that the concept serves so many RIMATE of interest – interrelationships, and biodiversity. At the functions (Vane-Wright, 1992). We may be interested basis of taxonomy lies that much-debated concept, the in classification as such, or in the evolutionary implica- species. tions of species; in the theory of species, or in simply M ODEL Because there is so much misunderstanding about how to recognize them; or in their reproductive, phys- what a species is, it is necessary to give some space to iological, or husbandry status. discussion of the concept. The importance of what we Most non-specialists probably have some vague mean by the word “species” goes way beyond taxonomy idea that species are defined by not interbreeding with as such: it affects such diverse fields as genetics, biogeog- each other; usually, that hybrids between different species raphy, population biology, ecology, ethology, and bio- are sterile, or that they are incapable of hybridizing at diversity; in an era in which threats to the natural all. Such an impression ultimately derives from the def- world and its biodiversity are accelerating, it affects inition by Mayr (1940), whereby species are “groups of conservation strategies (Rojas, 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • Framing Major Prebiotic Transitions As Stages of Protocell Development: Three Challenges for Origins-Of-Life Research
    Framing major prebiotic transitions as stages of protocell development: three challenges for origins-of-life research Ben Shirt-Ediss1, Sara Murillo-Sánchez2,3 and Kepa Ruiz-Mirazo*2,3 Commentary Open Access Address: Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2017, 13, 1388–1395. 1Interdisciplinary Computing and Complex BioSystems Group, doi:10.3762/bjoc.13.135 University of Newcastle, UK, 2Dept. Logic and Philosophy of Science, University of the Basque Country, Spain and 3Biofisika Institute Received: 16 February 2017 (CSIC, UPV-EHU), Spain Accepted: 27 June 2017 Published: 13 July 2017 Email: Kepa Ruiz-Mirazo* - [email protected] This article is part of the Thematic Series "From prebiotic chemistry to molecular evolution". * Corresponding author Guest Editor: L. Cronin Keywords: functional integration; origins of life; prebiotic evolution; protocells © 2017 Shirt-Ediss et al.; licensee Beilstein-Institut. License and terms: see end of document. Abstract Conceiving the process of biogenesis as the evolutionary development of highly dynamic and integrated protocell populations provides the most appropriate framework to address the difficult problem of how prebiotic chemistry bridged the gap to full-fledged living organisms on the early Earth. In this contribution we briefly discuss the implications of taking dynamic, functionally inte- grated protocell systems (rather than complex reaction networks in bulk solution, sets of artificially evolvable replicating molecules, or even these same replicating molecules encapsulated in passive compartments)
    [Show full text]
  • Species Concepts and the Evolutionary Paradigm in Modern Nematology
    JOURNAL OF NEMATOLOGY VOLUME 30 MARCH 1998 NUMBER 1 Journal of Nematology 30 (1) :1-21. 1998. © The Society of Nematologists 1998. Species Concepts and the Evolutionary Paradigm in Modern Nematology BYRON J. ADAMS 1 Abstract: Given the task of recovering and representing evolutionary history, nematode taxonomists can choose from among several species concepts. All species concepts have theoretical and (or) opera- tional inconsistencies that can result in failure to accurately recover and represent species. This failure not only obfuscates nematode taxonomy but hinders other research programs in hematology that are dependent upon a phylogenetically correct taxonomy, such as biodiversity, biogeography, cospeciation, coevolution, and adaptation. Three types of systematic errors inherent in different species concepts and their potential effects on these research programs are presented. These errors include overestimating and underestimating the number of species (type I and II error, respectively) and misrepresenting their phylogenetic relationships (type III error). For research programs in hematology that utilize recovered evolutionary history, type II and III errors are the most serious. Linnean, biological, evolutionary, and phylogenefic species concepts are evaluated based on their sensitivity to systematic error. Linnean and biologica[ species concepts are more prone to serious systematic error than evolutionary or phylogenetic concepts. As an alternative to the current paradigm, an amalgamation of evolutionary and phylogenetic species concepts is advocated, along with a set of discovery operations designed to minimize the risk of making systematic errors. Examples of these operations are applied to species and isolates of Heterorhab- ditis. Key words: adaptation, biodiversity, biogeography, coevolufion, comparative method, cospeciation, evolution, nematode, philosophy, species concepts, systematics, taxonomy.
    [Show full text]
  • CALIFORNIA's NORTH COAST: a Literary Watershed: Charting the Publications of the Region's Small Presses and Regional Authors
    CALIFORNIA'S NORTH COAST: A Literary Watershed: Charting the Publications of the Region's Small Presses and Regional Authors. A Geographically Arranged Bibliography focused on the Regional Small Presses and Local Authors of the North Coast of California. First Edition, 2010. John Sherlock Rare Books and Special Collections Librarian University of California, Davis. 1 Table of Contents I. NORTH COAST PRESSES. pp. 3 - 90 DEL NORTE COUNTY. CITIES: Crescent City. HUMBOLDT COUNTY. CITIES: Arcata, Bayside, Blue Lake, Carlotta, Cutten, Eureka, Fortuna, Garberville Hoopa, Hydesville, Korbel, McKinleyville, Miranda, Myers Flat., Orick, Petrolia, Redway, Trinidad, Whitethorn. TRINITY COUNTY CITIES: Junction City, Weaverville LAKE COUNTY CITIES: Clearlake, Clearlake Park, Cobb, Kelseyville, Lakeport, Lower Lake, Middleton, Upper Lake, Wilbur Springs MENDOCINO COUNTY CITIES: Albion, Boonville, Calpella, Caspar, Comptche, Covelo, Elk, Fort Bragg, Gualala, Little River, Mendocino, Navarro, Philo, Point Arena, Talmage, Ukiah, Westport, Willits SONOMA COUNTY. CITIES: Bodega Bay, Boyes Hot Springs, Cazadero, Cloverdale, Cotati, Forestville Geyserville, Glen Ellen, Graton, Guerneville, Healdsburg, Kenwood, Korbel, Monte Rio, Penngrove, Petaluma, Rohnert Part, Santa Rosa, Sebastopol, Sonoma Vineburg NAPA COUNTY CITIES: Angwin, Calistoga, Deer Park, Rutherford, St. Helena, Yountville MARIN COUNTY. CITIES: Belvedere, Bolinas, Corte Madera, Fairfax, Greenbrae, Inverness, Kentfield, Larkspur, Marin City, Mill Valley, Novato, Point Reyes, Point Reyes Station, Ross, San Anselmo, San Geronimo, San Quentin, San Rafael, Sausalito, Stinson Beach, Tiburon, Tomales, Woodacre II. NORTH COAST AUTHORS. pp. 91 - 120 -- Alphabetically Arranged 2 I. NORTH COAST PRESSES DEL NORTE COUNTY. CRESCENT CITY. ARTS-IN-CORRECTIONS PROGRAM (Crescent City). The Brief Pelican: Anthology of Prison Writing, 1993. 1992 Pelikanesis: Creative Writing Anthology, 1994. 1994 Virtual Pelican: anthology of writing by inmates from Pelican Bay State Prison.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 9. NATURAL SELECTION and BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION
    Chapter 9. NATURAL SELECTION AND BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION Which beginning of time [the Creation] according to our Chronologie, fell upon the entrance of the night preced- ing the twenty third day of Octob. in the year of the Julian Calendar, 710 [i.e. B.C. 4004]. Archbishop James Ussher (1581—1656) The Annals of the World1 (1658:1) “How stupid not to have thought of that!” Thomas Huxley (1825-1895), about Darwin’s theory of Evolution by Nat- ural Selection. I. Introduction A. Classical Discoveries of Biology From the mid 18th Century to the early part of the 20th, a large fraction of biologists’ efforts went into two massive collective discoveries, the discovery of biotic diversity, and the discovery of evolution. Over the period from 1750 to 1950 the careful descriptive analyses of Swedish biol- ogist Karl von Linné and his followers showed there to be on the order of 10 million or so different types of living organisms. The differences in biotas in different parts of the world came to be appreciated, the amazing diversity of the tropics was documented, and previ- ously unimagined major groups of organisms were discovered, including microorganisms and the biota of odd habitats like the oceanic plankton. The sometimes bizarre and always impressive adaptation of organisms to their habitats and ways of life greatly impressed the early scientific naturalists, who argued that it proved the existence of an All Seeing Design- er. Similarly, paleontologists described a huge variety of fossil plants and animals. The succession of forms, and the presence of many detailed structural similarities between liv- ing and extinct forms, as well as structural parallels between living forms, strongly suggest- ed that living and ancient forms of life were connected by branching lines of descent.
    [Show full text]
  • Uniting Micro- with Macroevolution Into an Extended Synthesis: Reintegrating Life’S Natural History Into Evolution Studies
    Uniting Micro- with Macroevolution into an Extended Synthesis: Reintegrating Life’s Natural History into Evolution Studies Nathalie Gontier Abstract The Modern Synthesis explains the evolution of life at a mesolevel by identifying phenotype–environmental interactions as the locus of evolution and by identifying natural selection as the means by which evolution occurs. Both micro- and macroevolutionary schools of thought are post-synthetic attempts to evolution- ize phenomena above and below organisms that have traditionally been conceived as non-living. Microevolutionary thought associates with the study of how genetic selection explains higher-order phenomena such as speciation and extinction, while macroevolutionary research fields understand species and higher taxa as biological individuals and they attribute evolutionary causation to biotic and abiotic factors that transcend genetic selection. The microreductionist and macroholistic research schools are characterized as two distinct epistemic cultures where the former favor mechanical explanations, while the latter favor historical explanations of the evolu- tionary process by identifying recurring patterns and trends in the evolution of life. I demonstrate that both cultures endorse radically different notions on time and explain how both perspectives can be unified by endorsing epistemic pluralism. Keywords Microevolution · Macroevolution · Origin of life · Evolutionary biology · Sociocultural evolution · Natural history · Organicism · Biorealities · Units, levels and mechanisms of evolution · Major transitions · Hierarchy theory But how … shall we describe a process which nobody has seen performed, and of which no written history gives any account? This is only to be investigated, first, in examining the nature of those solid bodies, the history of which we want to know; and 2dly, in exam- ining the natural operations of the globe, in order to see if there now actually exist such operations, as, from the nature of the solid bodies, appear to have been necessary to their formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproduction of a Protocell by Replication of Minority Molecule in Catalytic Reaction Network
    APS/123-QED Reproduction of a Protocell by Replication of Minority Molecule in Catalytic Reaction Network Atsushi Kamimura1 and Kunihiko Kaneko2, 3 1Department of Applied Physics, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan. 2Department of Basic Science, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 3-8-1, Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan 3Complex Systems Biology Project, ERATO, JST, Tokyo, Japan. (Dated: October 31, 2018) Abstract For understanding the origin of life, it is essential to explain the development of a compartmen- talized structure, which undergoes growth and division, from a set of chemical reactions. In this study, a hypercycle with two chemicals that mutually catalyze each other is considered in order to show that the reproduction of a protocell with a growth-division process naturally occurs when the replication speed of one chemical is considerably slower than that of the other chemical. It is observed that the protocell divides after a minority molecule is replicated at a slow synthesis rate, and thus, a synchrony between the reproduction of a cell and molecule replication is achieved. The robustness of such protocells against the invasion of parasitic molecules is also demonstrated. arXiv:1005.1142v1 [q-bio.CB] 7 May 2010 PACS numbers: 87.17.-d, 05.40.-a, 82.39.-k 1 Filling a gap between just a set of catalytic reactions and a reproducing cell is a difficult problem; however, it is essential to fully understand this relationship to unveil the origin of life, to establish a theory for a living state, and to experimentally synthesize protocells[1].
    [Show full text]
  • Dental Development of the Tai Forest Chimpanzees Revisited
    Journal of Human Evolution 58 (2010) 363e373 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Human Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jhevol Dental development of the Taï Forest chimpanzees revisited T.M. Smith a,b,*, B.H. Smith c, D.J. Reid d, H. Siedel e, L. Vigilant e, J.J. Hublin b, C. Boesch e a Department of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 11 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA b Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany c Museum of Anthropology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1107, USA d Department of Oral Biology, School of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4BW, UK e Department of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany article info abstract Article history: Developmental studies consistently suggest that teeth are more buffered from the environment than Received 27 June 2009 other skeletal elements. The surprising finding of late tooth eruption in wild chimpanzees (Zihlman et al., Accepted 25 November 2009 2004) warrants reassessment in a broader study of crown and root formation. Here we re-examine the skeletal collection of Taï Forest juvenile chimpanzees using radiography and physical examination. Keywords: Several new individuals are included, along with genetic and histological assessments of questionable Crown formation identities. Only half of the Taï juveniles employed by Zihlman et al. (2004) have age of death known with Root formation accuracy sufficient for precise comparisons with captive chimpanzees. One key individual in the former Tooth histology fi fi fi Radiographic standards study, misidenti ed during eld recovery as Xindra (age 8.3), is re-identi ed as Goshu (age 6.4).
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Lexical Semantics for Students of Translation
    IMOLA KATALIN NAGY AN INTRODUCTION TO LEXICAL SEMANTICS FOR STUDENTS OF TRANSLATION STUDIES SAPIENTIA HUNGARIAN UNIVERSITY OF TRANSYLVANIA FACULTY OF TECHNICAL AND HUMAN SCIENCES, TÂRGU-MUREŞ DEPARTMENT OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS IMOLA KATALIN NAGY AN INTRODUCTION TO LEXICAL SEMANTICS FOR STUDENTS OF TRANSLATION STUDIES SCIENTIA Publishing House Cluj-Napoca · 2017 The book was published with the support of: Publisher-in-chief: Zoltán Kása Readers: Andrea Peterlicean (Târgu-Mureş) Judit Szabóné Papp (Miskolc) The author takes all the professional responsibility for the present volume. Series cover: Dénes Miklósi First English edition: 2017 © Scientia, 2017 All rights reserved, including the rights for photocopying, public lecturing, radio and television broadcast, and translation of the whole work and of chapters as well. Descrierea CIP a Bibliotecii Naţionale a României IMOLA, KATALIN NAGY An introduction to lexical semantics for students of translation studies / Imola Katalin Nagy. - Cluj-Napoca : Scientia, 2017 ISBN 978-606-975-003-2 81 CONTENTS Preface . 11 1. Introduction . 13 2. History of semantics . 31 3. Defining semantics. Defining meaning . 39 4. Approaches to meaning . 53 5. Semantic relations . 73 6. Semantic roles . 105 7. Theories of meaning . 109 8. Types of meaning . 131 9. Changes of meaning . 161 10. Semantics and translation . 183 Bibliography . 203 Rezumat: Introducere în semantica lexicală pentru studenţii de la traductologie . 207 Kivonat: Bevezetés a jelentéstanba fordító szakos hallgatók számára . 209 About the author . 211 TARTALOMJEGYZÉK Előszó . 11 1. Bevezető . 13 2. A szemantika története . 31 3. A jelentéstan és a jelentés meghatározása . 39 4. A jelentés fogalmának értelmezései . 53 5. Szemantikai viszonyok . 73 6. Szemantikai szerepek . 105 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Speciation in Geographical Setting
    Speciation Speciation 2019 2019 The degree of reproductive isolation Substantial variation exists in among geographical sets of species - anagenesis populations within an actively 1859 1859 evolving species complex is often Achillea - yarrow tested by crossing experiments — as in the tidy tips of California 100K bp 100K bp back in time back in time back Rubus parviforus K = 4 mean population assignment 2 mya 2 mya ID CO WI_Door 5 mya BC_Hixton BC_MtRob WI_BruleS 5 mya BC_McLeod CA_Klamath MI_Windigo WA_Cascade WA_BridgeCr SD_BlackHills OR_Willamette MI_Drummond Speciation Speciation 2019 Reproductive isolation will ultimately stop all Although simple in concept, the recognition of species and thus the definition genetic connections among sets of populations of what are species have been controversial — more than likely due to the – cladogenesis or speciation continuum nature of the pattern resulting from the process of speciation 1859 Example: mechanical isolation via floral shape changes and pollinators between two parapatric species of California Salvia (sage) 100K bp back in time back 2 mya S. mellifera 5 mya Salvia apiana 1 Speciation Speciation Although simple in concept, the recognition of species and thus the definition Animal examples of speciation often show of what are species have been controversial — more than likely due to the clear reproductive barriers - hence zoologists continuum nature of the pattern resulting from the process of speciation preference (as opposed to botanists) for the Reproductive isolating Biological
    [Show full text]
  • According to Science Ramy Brustein Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
    The Creation of the World – According to Science Ramy Brustein Ben-Gurion University of the Negev How was the world created? People have asked this ever since they could ask anything, and answers have come from all sides: from religion, tradition, philosophy, mysticism….and science. While this does not seem like a problem amenable to scientific measurement, it has led scientists to come up with fascinating ideas and observations: the Big Bang, the concept of inflation, the fact that most of the world is made up of dark matter and dark energy which we cannot perceive, and more. Of course scientists cannot claim to know the definitive truth. But we can approach the question from a scientific viewpoint and see what we find out. How do we do that? First, we look to the data. Thanks to modern technology, we have much more information than did people of previous ages who asked the same question. Then we can use scientific methods and techniques to analyze the data, organize them in a coherent way and try and extract an answer. This process and its main findings will be described in the lecture. The Ghosts in the (Primitive) Soup: A Review of Some of the Debates that Shaped Early Discussions on the Origin and Nature of Life Antonio Lazcano Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México The heterotrophic origin of life proposed by Oparin and Haldane in the 1920’s was part of a Darwinian framework that assumed that living organisms were the historical outcome of a gradual transformation of lifeless matter. This idea was strongly opposed by the geneticist H.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ringling Archives Howard Tibbals' Allen J. Lester Papers, 1925-1955
    Howard Tibbals’ Collection of Allen J. Lester Papers, 1925 -1955 Descriptive Summary Repository The John and Mable Ringling Museum of Art Archives Creator Allen J. Lester, 1901 - 1957 Title Howard Tibbals’ Collection of Allen J. Lester Papers, 1925 - 1955 Language of Material English Extent 32 linear feet Provenance Acquired from the wife of Allen J. Lester by Howard Tibbals. Collection Overview The papers of Allen J. Lester chronicle his career from 1925 – 1956 working in varying capacities in the press department press of several American circuses and to a lesser degree as a promoter in the movie industry. The collection consists of press synopses; press department advice sheets; exchange invitations and requisitions; wage statements; contracts; expense account books; train passes; show script ticket books; press releases; photographs; business and personal correspondence; Christmas cards; birth announcement; news clippings and a courier; business cards; telegrams; notes; artifacts; route books; address books; circus tickets, press passes and employees passes; print plate molds and print blotters; press department forms; address books and addresses; 1939-1955 Ringling Brothers Barnum & Bailey press agent reports; and 1948 Dailey Bros. press agent reports. There are advertising materials and photographs for the movie production, Three Ring Circus starring Dean Martin, Jerry Lewis, Zsa Zsa Gabor and Jo Ann Dru. Stationery from the following The Ringling Archives Howard Tibbals’ Allen J. Lester Papers, 1925-1955 1 circuses and hotels are also held in the collection: AL G Barnes Circus, Cole Bros. Circus, Hagenbeck-Wallace Circus, Miller Bros. 101 Ranch, Ringling Brothers Barnum & Bailey Circus, Hotel Bonneville, Hotel Davenport, Muslim Temple, and the Plains Hotel.
    [Show full text]