DOCSLIB.ORG

Aerospace Facts and Figures 1981/82

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aerospace Facts and Figures 1981/82 ~€RO)P,LJC€ F,LJG) ,LiND FIGUR€) 1981/BQ i , Published by Aviation Week & Space Technology A MCGRAW-HILL PUBLICATION 1221 Avenue of the Americas New York, N.Y. 10020 (212) 997·3289 $ 7.95 Per Copy Copyright, July 1981 by Aerospace Industries Association of America, Inc. Library of Congress Catalog No. 46·25007 Compiled by Economic Data Service Aerospace Research Center Aerospace Industries Association of America, Inc. 1725 DeSales Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 347·2315 Director Allen H. Skaggs Chief Statistician Janet Martinusen Editorial Consultant James J. Haggerty Acknowledgments Civil Aeronautics Board Council of Economic Advisers Export-Import Bank of the United States Exxon International Company Federal Trade Commission General Aviation Manufacturers Association International Civil Aviation Organization McGraw·HIII Publications Company National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Science Foundation Office of Management and Budget U.S. Departments of Commerce (Bureau of the Census, Bureau of Economic Analysis) Defense (Comptroller; Directorate for Information, Operations and Reports; Army, Navy, Air Force) Labor (Bureau of Labor Statistics) Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration) CONTE: NT~ 6 ~€WOID 8 AE:ROOACE: S'UMMARV 30 AIRCRAFT PRODUCTiai 47 MIS'S'ILE: PROGRAMS' 57 WAC€ PROGRAMS' 73 AIR TRANS'~TATiai 90 HE:LICOPTE:R TRANS'~TATiai 99 Re:S'E:ARCH AND DE:\IE:la>ME:NT 110 FORE:IGN TRAD€ 124 E:MPLOVM€NT 'i;., 134 FINANCE: 145 GLOOARV 152 INDE:X For the U.S. aerospace industry, 1980 was a year of solid growth in virtually all categories of activity. Sales reached a new record level, which-even allowing for the high rate of in­ flation-reflected an excellent year overall. In terms of inflation-adjusted cons­ tant dollars, sales in 1980 topped those of every year since 1969. Measured as a percentage of sales, earnings dipped well below the all-time high recorded a year earlier. Still, for the fourth consecutive year, the profit rate was above 4 percent. The general improvement in profit levels is encouraging since future capital needs of the industry will be considerable if it is to fund future generations of commercial aircraft and the expected buildup in the defense sec­ tor. Once again, we are gratified by the industry's achievements in the international marketplace, which underscore the importance to the U.S. economy of high­ value, high-technology aerospace exports. The industry recorded its highest-ever levels of export sales and trade balance, thus offsetting to a great extent the lag­ ging U.S. performance in other areas of international trade. The aerospace trade balance, best among U.S. manufacturing industries, is particularly impressive in view of growing foreign competition and a resultant significant increase in aerospace imports. During 1980, the industry's total backlog increased by more than 20 percent, with gains in all major categories. This assures continuing high activity levels for immediate future years. The outlook for the longer term is similarly brigh 1 The industry's defense pro­ duction, which declined as a percentage of the total uuring the 1970s, seems head­ ed for a new upturn in light of the Administration's projected defense outlays for coming years. 6 Despite the debut of the Space Shuttle, there is little immediate prospect for ex­ pansion of the industry's workload in development and fabrication of civil space systems. However, funding for military space development has been increasing steadily in recent years, to the point where civil and defense space outlays are now almost equal. Moderate growth is expected in the space sector during the first half of this decade. With the expanded capability the Shuttle affords for both civil and defense space operations, space activity could increase significantly in the latter part of the decade. While deliveries of commercial transports in 1981 are expected to be fewer than in 1980, the large backlog of orders indicates a continuing hjgh level of pro­ duction in the near-term. The financial problems of the world's airlines have slowed the flow of orders, but the airlines' need for new and replacement aircraft has not changed; projections ow a world transport market of about $125 billion over the next 10 years. Given expected improvement in the airlines' finan­ cial status, and consequent resumption of earlier-contemplated re-eqwpment plans, transport manufacturing activity may go well beyond its current level. In summary, the year was a good one for aerospace. The strong performance of sales and exports and record backlog, along with excell ent prospects for the commercial transport and defense sectors, hold out the prornise of continued health and growth for the industry. Karl G. Harr, Jr. President Aerospace Industries Association 7 AE:R(J)PAC€ ~UMMARY The aerospace industry closed out the dustry's 1980 performance: first year of the new decade on a high Sales. Total sales amounted to note, recording new statistical peaks $53.3 billion, an increase of $8.4 in sales, backlog, exports and con­ billion over 1979. Most of the in­ tribution to the U.S. trade balance. crease-more than $5 billion-was Much of the statistical growth, of due to a sharp boost in aircraft sales, course, was due to the high U.S. infla­ but there were gains in all categories. tion rate. However, there was also Aerospace industry sales as a substantial real growth, as gains in percentage of the Gross National Pro­ many categories exceeded the nine duct increased from 1.9 percent in percent inflation rate by wide 1979 to two percent in 1980. In rela­ margins. Sales, for example, increas­ tion to tot-t! sales of all U.S. manufac­ ed almost 19 percent, backlog more turing i11J ustries, aerospace sales than 20 percent and exports more amounted to three percent; the figure than 32 percent. compares with 2. 7 percent in the Here is a breakdown of the in- previous year. 8 AEROSPACE SUMMARY Profit. The industry's net profit the previous year, but the dollar value after taxes, measured as a percentage of shipments increased substantially, of sales, was 4.2 percent. This from $10.6 billion in 1979 to $13.1 represented a substantial drop from billion in 1980. A marked decline in the five percent recorded in the general aviation aircraft deliveries previous year. A major factor in the reduced total civil aircraft shipments reduced profit rate was high interest to 13,634 units, down from 18,450 in on borrowings necessary to finance 1979 . new plant and equipment expendi­ As is generally the case, the bulk of tures at a time when such expendi- the dollar value of 1980 shipments was • tures were at their highest-ever level. in commercial transports-$9.9 billion As in previous years, the aerospace or more than 75 percent of the total; profit remained well below the the amount represents an increase of average for all U.S. manufacturing $1.9 billion over 1979 sales. The in­ corporations, which was 4.9 percent dustry delivered 387 transports, 11 in 1980. more than in 1979. In both dollar Backlog. Once again-as in the value and numbers, gains were far previous year-the industry's backlog below those of the previous year. climbed dramatically. At year-end General aviation plane shipments 1980, orders on the books amounted totaled 11,881, the lowest level since to more than $95 billion, up almost 1972; the figure compares with 17,055 $17 billion over year-end 1979. The in 1979. However, the value of backlog included $53.6 billion in non­ shipments increased by some $300 government orders and $41.5 billion million, to $2.5 billion. The major in government work. portion of the production drop was in Following the traditional pattern, relatively low-value single-engine air­ orders for aircraft-including engines craft, an area severely impacted by the and parts-constituted the principal state of the U.S. economy, fuel costs, element of the backlog-$59.5 bl!lion and, in particular, high interest rates. or more than 62 percent. There were But the industry delivered 330 jet air­ also major gains in orders for non­ craft (up 14 percent) and 795 turbo­ aerospace products produced by props (up 25 percent). Increases in manufacturers, and for "other these higher-value categories more aerospace,'' a category which includes than offset lower single-engine sales. conversions, modifications, and Civil helicopter production con­ ground support equipment, as well as tinued the upward trend in evidence basic and applied research, and design since 1976. The industry's rotary-wing and development. A moderate in­ segment produced 1,366 civil helicop­ crease was recorded in missile/space ters, 347 more than in 1979. Dollar backlog. value increased from $403 million in Civil Aircraft Production. In 1980, 1979 to $656 million in 1980. shipments of civil aircraft were down Military Aircraft Production. The almost 5,000 units below the level of declining trend of earlier years was 9 AEROSPACE FACTS AND FIGURES 1981/82 reversed in 1980 as military aircraft than at the end of the previous year. production increased in number of deliveries and in dollar value. The Space Programs. Combined sales of Department of Defense accepted 606 civil and military space vehicle aircraft for operation by the U.S. systems, excluding propulsion units, military services, compared with 531 amounted to $3.3 billion in 1980. The in 1979. The Air Force led in accep­ figure is not directly comparable to tances with 359 aircraft, 48 more than 1979's $2.5 billion due to a change in in the previous year. Army accep­ statistical reporting procedures in tances totaled 160, up 43 from 1979, which the 1980 total includes, for the and deliveries to the Navy declined first time, sales to customers other from 103 units in 1979 to only 87 in than U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CAAM 3 Report
    3rd Technical Report On Propulsion System and Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) Related Aircraft Safety Hazards A joint effort of The Federal Aviation Administration and The Aerospace Industries Association March 30, 2017 Questions concerning distribution of this report should be addressed to: Federal Aviation Administration Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Table of Contents iii List of Figures v I. Foreword 1 II. Background 1 III. Scope 2 IV. Discussion 3 V. Relationship to Previous CAAM Data 7 VI. General Notes and Comments 8 VII. Fleet Utilization 11 VIII. CAAM3 Team Members 12 IX. Appendices List of Appendices 13 Appendix 1: Standardized Aircraft Event Hazard Levels and Definitions 14 • General Notes Applicable to All Event Hazard Levels 19 • Rationale for Changes in Severity Classifications 19 • Table 1. Historical Comparison of Severity Level Descriptions and Rationale for CAAM3 Changes 21 Appendix 2: Event Definitions 39 Appendix 3: Propulsion System and Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) Related Aircraft Safety Hazards (2001 through 2012) 44 • Uncontained Blade 44 • Uncontained Disk 50 • Uncontained – Other 56 iii • Uncontained – All Parts 62 • High Bypass Comparison by Generation 63 • Relationship Among High Bypass Fleet 64 • Case Rupture 66 • Case Burnthrough 69 • Under-Cowl Fire 72 • Strut/Pylon Fire 76 • Fuel Leak 78 • Engine Separation 82 • Cowl Separation 85 • Propulsion System Malfunction Recognition and Response (PSMRR) 88 • Crew Error 92 • Reverser/Beta Malfunction – In-Flight Deploy 96 • Fuel Tank Rupture/Explosion 99 • Tailpipe Fire 102 • Multiple-Engine Powerloss – Non-Fuel 107 • Multiple-Engine Powerloss – Fuel-Related 115 • Fatal Human Ingestion / Propeller Contact 120 • IFSD Snapshot by Hazard Level – 2012 Data Only 122 • RTO Snapshot by Hazard Level – 2012 Data Only 123 • APU Events 123 • Turboprop Events 124 • Matrices of Event Counts, Hazard Ratios and Rates 127 • Data Comparison to Previous CAAM Data 135 [ The following datasets which were collected in CAAM2 were not collected in CAAM3.
    [Show full text]
  • California State University, Northridge Low Earth Orbit
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE LOW EARTH ORBIT BUSINESS CENTER A Project submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Engineering by Dallas Gene Bienhoff May 1985 The Proj'ectof Dallas Gene Bienhoff is approved: Dr. B. J. Bluth Professor T1mothy Wm. Fox - Chair California State University, Northridge ii iii ACKNOWLEDGEHENTS I wish to express my gratitude to those who have helped me over the years to complete this thesis by providing encouragement, prodding and understanding: my advisor, Tim Fox, Chair of Mechanical and Chemical Engineering; Dr. B. J. Bluth for her excellent comments on human factors; Dr. B. J. Campbell for improving the clarity; Richard Swaim, design engineer at Rocketdyne Division of Rockwell International for providing excellent engineering drawings of LEOBC; Mike Morrow, of the Advanced Engineering Department at Rockwell International who provided the Low Earth Orbit Business Center panel figures; Bob Bovill, a commercial artist, who did all the artistic drawings because of his interest in space commercialization; Linda Martin for her word processing skills; my wife, Yolanda, for egging me on without nagging; and finally Erik and Danielle for putting up with the excuse, "I have to v10rk on my paper," for too many years. iv 0 ' PREFACE The Low Earth Orbit Business Center (LEOBC) was initially conceived as a modular structure to be launched aboard the Space Shuttle, it evolved to its present configuration as a result of research, discussions and the desire to increase the efficiency of space utilization. Although the idea of placing space stations into Earth orbit is not new, as is discussed in the first chapter, and the configuration offers nothing new, LEOBC is unique in its application.
    [Show full text]
  • Aeronautical Engineering
    NASA SP-7037 (36) ND AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING A SPECIAL BIBLIOGRAPHY WITH INDEXES Supplement 36 OCTOBER 1973 ZkS&-Sp-7037 (36) EROAUTIC&L N74-14702 0GIEEG A SPCILL BIBLIOGMPHY WITH INDEXES, SUPPLENgIT 36 (N3AS) $5.25 Unclas 00/01 27136 NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION ACCESSION NUMBER RANGES Accession numbers cited in this Supplement fall within the following ranges: IAA (A-10000 Series) A73-34073 -- A73-37144 STAR (N-10000 Series) N73-25997 - N 73-27884 This bibliography was prepared by the NASA Scientific and Technical Information Facility operated for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration by Informatics Tisco, Inc. The Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration has determined that the publication of this periodical is necessary in the transaction of the public business required by law of this Agency. Use of funds for printing this periodical has been approved by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget through July 1, 1974. N74-14702 AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING - A SPECIAL BIBLIOGRAPHY (SUPPLEMENT 36) National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, DC Oct 73 N74-14702 1. Report No. 2. Governmmnt Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. NASA SP-7037 (36) 4. Titleand Subtitle 5. Report Date October 1973 AERONAUTICAL ENG INEERING e.Performing Organization Code A Special Bibliography (Supplement 36) 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. 10. Work Unit No. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address National Aeronautics and Space Administration 11. Contractor Grant No. Washington, D. C; 20546 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15.
    [Show full text]
  • VII Congress
    Association of Space Explorers 7th Planetary Congress Berlin, Germany 1991 Commemorative Poster Signature Key Viktor Afanasyev Vladimir Aksyonov Alexander Alexandrov (Bul.) Soyuz TM-11 Soyuz 22, Soyuz T-2 Soyuz TM-5 Joe Allen Alexander Balandin John-David Bartoe STS 5, STS 51A Soyuz TM-9 STS 51F Patrick Baudry Gerald Carr Robert Cenker STS 51G Skylab IV 7 STS 61C Jean-Loup Chretien Charles Conrad, Jr. Samuel Durrance Soyuz T-6, Soyuz TM-7 Gemini 5, Gemini 11 STS 35 Apollo 12, Skylab II Lev Dyomin John Fabian Bertalan Farkas Soyuz 15 STS 7, STS 51G Soyuz 36 Reinhard Furrer Drew Gaffney Viktor Gorbatko STS 61A STS 40 Soyuz 7, Soyuz 24, Soyuz 37 Georgi Grechko Miroslaw Hermaszewski Alexander Ivanchenkov Soyuz 17, Soyuz 26 Soyuz 30 Soyuz 29, Soyuz T-6 Soyuz T-14 Georgi Ivanov Yevgeni Khrunov Vladimir Kovolyonok Soyuz 33 Soyuz 5 Soyuz 25, Soyuz 29, Soyuz T-4 Alexei Leonov Don Lind James Lovell, Jr. Voskhod 2, Apollo-Soyuz STS 51B Gemini 7, Gemini 12 Apollo 8, Apollo 13 Vladimir Lyakhov Oleg Makarov Gennadi Manakov Soyuz 32, Soyuz T-9 Soyuz 12, Soyuz 27, Soyuz T-3 Soyuz TM-10 Soyuz TM-6 Musa Manarov Jon McBride Bruce McCandless II Soyuz TM-4, Soyuz TM-11 STS 41G STS 41B, STS 31 Ernst Messerschmid William Nelson Wubbo Ockels STS 61A STS 61C STS 61A Donald Peterson Leonid Popov Dumitru Prunariu STS 6 Soyuz 35, Soyuz 40, Soyuz T-7 Soyuz 40 Vladimir Remek Stuart Roosa Rusty Schweickart Soyuz 28 Apollo 14 Apollo 9 Vitali Sevastyonov Thomas Stafford Gennadi Strekalov Soyuz 9, Soyuz 18 Gemini 6, Gemini 9, Apollo 10 Soyuz T-3, Soyuz T-8 Apollo-Soyuz Soyuz TM-11 Valentina Tereshkova Lodewijk van den Berg Igor Volk Vostok 6 STS 51B Soyuz T-12 Charles Walker Donald Williams Boris Yegorov STS 41D, STS 51D, STS 61B STS 51D, STS 34 Voskhod 1 Vyacheslav Zhudov Soyuz 23 This poster commemorates the 7th Planetary Congress of the Association of Space Explorers (ASE).
    [Show full text]
  • Part 2 — Aircraft Type Designators (Decode) Partie 2 — Indicatifs De Types D'aéronef (Décodage) Parte 2 — Designadores De Tipos De Aeronave (Descifrado) Часть 2
    2-1 PART 2 — AIRCRAFT TYPE DESIGNATORS (DECODE) PARTIE 2 — INDICATIFS DE TYPES D'AÉRONEF (DÉCODAGE) PARTE 2 — DESIGNADORES DE TIPOS DE AERONAVE (DESCIFRADO) ЧАСТЬ 2. УСЛОВНЫЕ ОБОЗНАЧЕНИЯ ТИПОВ ВОЗДУШНЫХ СУДОВ ( ДЕКОДИРОВАНИЕ ) DESIGNATOR MANUFACTURER, MODEL DESCRIPTION WTC DESIGNATOR MANUFACTURER, MODEL DESCRIPTION WTC INDICATIF CONSTRUCTEUR, MODÈLE DESCRIPTION WTC INDICATIF CONSTRUCTEUR, MODÈLE DESCRIPTION WTC DESIGNADOR FABRICANTE, MODELO DESCRIPCIÓN WTC DESIGNADOR FABRICANTE, MODELO DESCRIPCIÓN WTC УСЛ . ИЗГОТОВИТЕЛЬ , МОДЕЛЬ ВОЗДУШНОГО WTC УСЛ . ИЗГОТОВИТЕЛЬ , МОДЕЛЬ ВОЗДУШНОГО WTC ОБОЗНАЧЕНИЕ ОБОЗНАЧЕНИЕ A1 DOUGLAS, Skyraider L1P M NORTH AMERICAN ROCKWELL, Quail CommanderL1P L DOUGLAS, AD Skyraider L1P M NORTH AMERICAN ROCKWELL, A-9 Sparrow L1P L DOUGLAS, EA-1 Skyraider L1P M Commander NORTH AMERICAN ROCKWELL, A-9 Quail CommanderL1P L A2RT KAZAN, Ansat 2RT H2T L NORTH AMERICAN ROCKWELL, Sparrow CommanderL1P L A3 DOUGLAS, TA-3 Skywarrior L2J M DOUGLAS, NRA-3 SkywarriorL2J M A10 FAIRCHILD (1), OA-10 Thunderbolt 2 L2J M DOUGLAS, A-3 Skywarrior L2J M FAIRCHILD (1), A-10 Thunderbolt 2L2J M FAIRCHILD (1), Thunderbolt 2L2J M DOUGLAS, ERA-3 SkywarriorL2J M AVIADESIGN, A-16 Sport Falcon L1P L DOUGLAS, Skywarrior L2J M A16 AEROPRACT, A-19 L1P L A3ST AIRBUS, Super Transporter L2J H A19 AIRBUS, Beluga L2J H A20 DOUGLAS, Havoc L2P M DOUGLAS, A-20 Havoc L2P M AIRBUS, A-300ST Super TransporterL2J H AEROPRACT, Solo L1P L AIRBUS, A-300ST Beluga L2J H A21 SATIC, Beluga L2J H AEROPRACT, A-21 Solo L1P L SATIC, Super Transporter L2J H A22 SADLER, Piranha
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Library 
    Interagency Aviation Training Aircraft Library Disclaimer: The information provided in the Aircraft Library is intended to provide basic information for mission planning purposes and should NOT be used for flight planning. Due to variances in Make and Model, along with aircraft configuration and performance variability, it is necessary acquire the specific technical information for an aircraft from the operator when planning a flight. Revised: June 2021 Interagency Aviation Training—Aircraft Library This document includes information on Fixed-Wing aircraft (small, large, air tankers) and Rotor-Wing aircraft/Helicopters (Type 1, 2, 3) to assist in aviation mission planning. Click on any Make/Model listed in the different categories to view information about that aircraft. Fixed-Wing Aircraft - SMALL Make /Model High Low Single Multi Fleet Vendor Passenger Wing Wing engine engine seats Aero Commander XX XX XX 5 500 / 680 FL Aero Commander XX XX XX 7 680V / 690 American Champion X XX XX 1 8GCBC Scout American Rockwell XX XX 0 OV-10 Bronco Aviat A1 Husky XX XX X XX 1 Beechcraft A36/A36TC XX XX XX 6 B36TC Bonanza Beechcraft C99 XX XX XX 19 Beechcraft XX XX XX 7 90/100 King Air Beechcraft 200 XX XX XX XX 7 Super King Air Britten-Norman X X X 9 BN-2 Islander Cessna 172 XX XX XX 3 Skyhawk Cessna 180 XX XX XX 3 Skywagon Cessna 182 XX XX XX XX 3 Skylane Cessna 185 XX XX XX XX 4 Skywagon Cessna 205/206 XX XX XX XX 5 Stationair Cessna 207 Skywagon/ XX XX XX 6 Stationair Cessna/Texron XX XX XX 7 - 10 208 Caravan Cessna 210 X X x 5 Centurion Fixed-Wing Aircraft - SMALL—cont’d.
    [Show full text]
  • Expedition 37
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration International Space Station [MISSION SUMMARY] begins Sept. 11 and ends Nov. 10. This expedition will include many research EXPEDITION 37 projects focusing on human health and human physiology, as well as student experiments in areas such as antibacterial resistance, hydroponics and cellular division. There is one Russian spacewalk planned for Oleg Kotov and Sergey Ryazanskiy. THE CREW: Soyuz 35 TMA-09M • Launch: May 28, 2013 • Landing: Nov. 10, 2013 Soyuz 36 TMA-10M • Launch: Sept. 25, 2013 • Landing: March 12, 2014 Karen L. Nyberg (NASA) – Flight Engineer Oleg Kotov (Roscosmos) – Flight Engineer (AH’-leg KO’-tuff) Born: Vining, Minn. Born: Simferopol, Ukraine Interests: Running marathons and sewing Interests: Scuba diver Spaceflights: STS-124, Exp. 36/37 Spaceflights: Exp. 15, Exp. 22/23 Twitter: @AstroKarenN Cosmonaut Bio Astronaut Bio Fyodor Yurchikhin (Roscosmos) - Commander Sergey Ryazanskiy (Roscosmos) – Flight Engineer (fee-YOH-dur yur-CHEE-kihn) (Sir-gey Rih-ZAN-skee) Born: Batumi, Georgia Born: Moscow, Russia Interests: Collecting stamps and space logos, sports, Interests: Numismatics, playing guitar, tourism, sports history of cosmonautics, reading Spaceflights: Exp. 37/38 will be his first mission Spaceflights: STS-112, Exp. 15, Exp. 24/25, Exp. 36/37 Cosmonaut Bio Cosmonaut Bio Luca Parmitano (ESA) - Flight Engineer Mike Hopkins (NASA) – Flight Engineer (LU-ka par-muh-TAN-oh) Born: Paternò, Italy Born: Lebanon, Mo. Interests: Scuba diving, snowboarding, skydiving, weight Interests: Backpacking, camping, snow skiing, weight training, swimming, reading, and music lifting, running, hockey, football Spaceflights: Exp. 36/37 is his first mission Spaceflights: Exp. 37/38 will be his first mission Twitter: @astro_luca Twitter: @AstroIllini Astronaut Bio Facebook: facebook.com/trainastronaut Astronaut Bio THE SCIENCE: Expedition 37 includes a variety of research, but several new investigations will focus on human health and human physiology.
    [Show full text]
  • Inhaltsverzeichnis
    Inhaltsverzeichnis Zur Gecchichte das Flugzeugs 7 7 Transavia PI-12 „Airtruk'7PL-12 U „Flying CHINA Mango" 36/570 1. Die Nachahmung des Vogelflugs 77 Harbin C-11 57/572 „Jie-Fang" 57/572 2. Die Vorbilder Nanchang F-6bis 58/572 für den Flug des Menschen 12 BELGIEN „Peking-1" 58/572 3. Die ersten Motorflugzeugprojekte 12 Avions Fairey „Tipsy Nipper" 37/570 4. Die Verwirklichung des Gleitflugs- SABCAS-2 37/570 Voraussetzung für den Motorflug 14 Stampe et Renard SV-4 C 38/570 CSSR 6. Der erste Motorflug der Brüder Wright 75 Aero Ae-02 59/572 6. Die ersten Motorflüge in Europa AeroA-42 59/572 und die Entwicklung der Luftfahrttechnik BRASILIEN Aero 145 60/572 bis zum Jahre 1914 76 AviaBH-3 60/572 7. Der erste Weltkrieg EMBRAER EMB-110 „Bandeirante" 39/570 Avia B-534 67/572 und die Luftfahrttechnik 17 EMBRAER EMB-200/201 „Ipanema" 39/570 AviaB-135 67/572 ITA „Urupema" 40/570 HC-2 „Heli Baby'7HC-102 62/572 8. Der Aufschwung der Luftfahrttechnik Neiva 360 C „Regente"/„Regenta Elo'7 L-13„Blanik" 63/572 in den Jahren 1919 bis 1939 19 „Lanceiro" 40/570 L-60 „Brigadyr" 63/572 8.1. Bauweisen 19 Neiva Paulistinha 56-C/56-D 47/570 L-40 „Meta Sokol" 64/572 8.2. Triebwerke 20 Neiva N-621 „Universal"/T-25 47/570 L-200 „Morava" 64/572 8.3. Aerodynamik 21 L-29 „Delfin" 65/572 8.4. Geschwindigkeiten 22 L-39 „Albatros" 65/572 8.5. Das Verkehrsflugzeug 24 L-410 „Turbolet" 66/572 8.6.
    [Show full text]
  • Nº 565 1987 Febrero
    REVISTA DE LAS ARMAS Y SERVICIOS FEBRERO 1987 AÑO XLVIII. NUM. 565 REVISTA DE LOS MANDOS SUBALTERNOS FEBRERO 1987 AÑO XLVI. NUM. 537 EDITA SERVICIO DE PUBLICACIONES DEL ESTADO MAYOR DEL EJERCITO DIRECCION ADMINISTRACION CONSEJO DE REDACCION Director: Jefe: Coroneles AREBA BLANCÓ, DE LA Coronel GONZALEZ RUIZ Coronel GUIO CASTAÑOS PUENTE SICRE y CALAMA ROSELLO, Tenientes Coroneles PEÑAS PEREZ, QUE- Subdirector y 2.° Jefe: RO RODILES, BENITO GONZALEZyTO Jefe de colaboraciones: Comandante PEREZ TEIJEIRO RRES MEDINA, Comandantes ORTEGA Coronel MARTIN y LLORET GADEA. GUERRERO ROIZ DE LA PARRA Jefe de Ediciones: Promotor de Publicidad: Coronel SESE CERESUELA ANGEL SANDOVAL Confeccionador, maquetista y dirección artística:FEDERICO BLANCO. Paginas EJERCITO GUION Editorial 3 3 Abreviaturas 6 6 Orientaciones para la consulta del Balance Militar 9 9 Guión 1 1 Países y Pactos pdncip&es EJERCITO GUION Indice de países, . ... .,. .. .,.. ..... 14 14 Estados Unidos.....,. ,, ,, . ,... ...,.. ,, .,. ., .,. .. , , ,,. ,,.,,, , , 15 15 Unión Soviética... ....., 37 29 Las Alianzas y Europa • EV Pacto de Varsovia 59 43 • EV Tratado del Atlántico Norte82 50 • Otros países europeos112 72 Oriente Medio y el Norte de Africa 120 80 Africa al Sur del Sáhara157 101 Asia y Australasia 264 132 Hispanoamérica 236 156 • Cuadros y AnáU&s 1. Vectores de lanzamiento nuclear desplegados en el mundo 277 181 2. Sistemas de armas nucleares potenciales OTAN/Pacto de Varsovia en Europa 286 190 3. Principales convenios de armamento conocidos concertadosentre julio de 1985 y julio de 1986288 192 4. Comparación de presupuestos de defensa y efectivos de personal291 195 5. Estimación del equilibrio estratégico nuclear296 200 6. El equilibrio convencional Este-Oeste en Europa301 205 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 2 Almaz, Salyut, And
    Part 2 Almaz/Salyut/Mir largely concerned with assembly in 12, 1964, Chelomei called upon his Part 2 Earth orbit of a vehicle for circumlu- staff to develop a military station for Almaz, Salyut, nar flight, but also described a small two to three cosmonauts, with a station made up of independently design life of 1 to 2 years. They and Mir launched modules. Three cosmo- designed an integrated system: a nauts were to reach the station single-launch space station dubbed aboard a manned transport spacecraft Almaz (“diamond”) and a Transport called Siber (or Sever) (“north”), Logistics Spacecraft (Russian 2.1 Overview shown in figure 2-2. They would acronym TKS) for reaching it (see live in a habitation module and section 3.3). Chelomei’s three-stage Figure 2-1 is a space station family observe Earth from a “science- Proton booster would launch them tree depicting the evolutionary package” module. Korolev’s Vostok both. Almaz was to be equipped relationships described in this rocket (a converted ICBM) was with a crew capsule, radar remote- section. tapped to launch both Siber and the sensing apparatus for imaging the station modules. In 1965, Korolev Earth’s surface, cameras, two reentry 2.1.1 Early Concepts (1903, proposed a 90-ton space station to be capsules for returning data to Earth, 1962) launched by the N-1 rocket. It was and an antiaircraft cannon to defend to have had a docking module with against American attack.5 An ports for four Soyuz spacecraft.2, 3 interdepartmental commission The space station concept is very old approved the system in 1967.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Manned Space Flights Spacecalc
    CBS News Manned Space Flights Current through STS-117 Table of Manned Space Flights SpaceCalc Total: 260 Crew Launch Land Duration By Robert A. Braeunig* Vostok 1 Yuri Gagarin 04/12/61 04/12/61 1h:48m First manned space flight (1 orbit). MR 3 Alan Shepard 05/05/61 05/05/61 15m:22s First American in space (suborbital). Freedom 7. MR 4 Virgil Grissom 07/21/61 07/21/61 15m:37s Second suborbital flight; spacecraft sank, Grissom rescued. Liberty Bell 7. Vostok 2 Guerman Titov 08/06/61 08/07/61 1d:01h:18m First flight longer than 24 hours (17 orbits). MA 6 John Glenn 02/20/62 02/20/62 04h:55m First American in orbit (3 orbits); telemetry falsely indicated heatshield unlatched. Friendship 7. MA 7 Scott Carpenter 05/24/62 05/24/62 04h:56m Initiated space flight experiments; manual retrofire error caused 250 mile landing overshoot. Aurora 7. Vostok 3 Andrian Nikolayev 08/11/62 08/15/62 3d:22h:22m First twinned flight, with Vostok 4. Vostok 4 Pavel Popovich 08/12/62 08/15/62 2d:22h:57m First twinned flight. On first orbit came within 3 miles of Vostok 3. MA 8 Walter Schirra 10/03/62 10/03/62 09h:13m Developed techniques for long duration missions (6 orbits); closest splashdown to target to date (4.5 miles). Sigma 7. MA 9 Gordon Cooper 05/15/63 05/16/63 1d:10h:20m First U.S. evaluation of effects of one day in space (22 orbits); performed manual reentry after systems failure, landing 4 miles from target.
    [Show full text]
  • National Archives and Records Administration 8601 Adelphi Road College Park, Maryland 20740-6001
    National Archives and Records Administration 8601 Adelphi Road College Park, Maryland 20740-6001 List of Documentation File Title: T-100 Domestic Segment Data (Data Bank 28DS), J~uary - Depember 2002 Accession Number: NN3-398-04-002 Number of pages 1. NARA Documentation [Folder 1] List of Documentation 001 2. Agency Documentation 1. Data Bank 28DS File and Records Descriptions (December 2002) [Folder 2] 008 2. Accounting and Reporting Directive No. 260 [Folder 3] 030 3. Accounting and Reporting Directive No. 263 [Folder 4] 004 4. Accounting and Reporting Direetive No. 266 [Folder 5] 001 5. World Area Code (August 2003) [Folder 6] 012 6. Airport Code File by Entity [Folders 7 & 8] 374 7. Airport Code File by Airport Code [Folders 9 & 10] 364 8. Airport Code File by Code [Folders 11 & 12] 370 9 .. Carrier Decode File by Entity [Folder 13] 077 10. Carrier Decode File by Carrier Name [Folder 14] 054 .11. Carrier Decode File by Carrier Code [Folder 15] 060 12. Air Carrier Traffic Statistics {Folders 16 & 17] 332 3. NARA Processing Materials [Folder 18] 1. Automated V.erification of Electronic Records 2. AERIC Layout Report 3. AERIC Checklist for Verification 4. AERIC Code List Report 5. AERIC Load Report 6. AERIC Verification Statement 7. National Archives Produced Printout for Some Records 8. Sample Computer Dump Prepared by: Vivela T. Green, Archives Specialist Date: August 4, 2005 NARA 's web site is http://www.nara.gov NARA Reference Copy U.S. Department of Transportation . Bureau. of Transportations Statistics rv Office of Airline Information Data Bank 28DS File and Record Descriptions December 2002 - •.
    [Show full text]