DOCSLIB.ORG

Report on River Barge System Feasibility Study Project, South Sudan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report on River Barge System Feasibility Study Project, South Sudan Report on River Barge System Feasibility Study Project, South Sudan March 2018 Document Information Date 04.03.2018 HYDROC Project P170418 No. Responsible Sebastian Bubmann and Dr. Georg Petersen Client United Nations Office for Project Services Client Shinobu Mashima Representative Contract No. UNOPS/SSOC/RIVERBARGE/CON/SERVICES/2017-020-(20633- 001-River Barge System Feasibility Study) This report supersedes all previous versions of the same, rendering them invalid Cover image: White Nile River between Bor and Shambe as seen during river survey - © by HYDROC. Contact HYDROC GmbH Siegum 4 24960 Siegum Germany Tel - +49 172 450 91 49 Email - [email protected] Table of contents 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 6 1.1. PROJECT BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................. 6 1.2. PROJECT OBJECTIVE ...................................................................................................................... 7 1.3. PROJECT SCOPE ............................................................................................................................ 7 2. SURVEY AND ASSESSMENT OF THE CONDITIONS OF THE WHITE NILE RIVER IN SOUTH SUDAN ....................................................................................................................... 10 2.1. SECURITY ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................................ 10 2.2. CURRENT CONDITIONS FOR RIVER TRANSPORT ............................................................................. 13 2.2.1. Juba – Bor / Mingkaman ..................................................................................................... 15 2.2.2. White Nile River – Bentiu .................................................................................................... 16 2.2.3. Malakal – Renk ................................................................................................................... 16 3. RIVER PORT ASSESSMENTS ......................................................................................... 20 3.1. INTRODUCTIONS............................................................................................................................ 20 3.2. PORT SAFETY ............................................................................................................................... 20 3.3. JUBA ............................................................................................................................................ 21 3.4. MANGALLA ................................................................................................................................... 24 3.5. TEREKEKA .................................................................................... ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. 3.6. BOR ............................................................................................................................................. 26 3.7. MINGKAMAN ................................................................................................................................. 28 3.8. SHAMBE ....................................................................................................................................... 30 3.9. ADOK ........................................................................................................................................... 32 3.10. BENTIU ......................................................................................................................................... 33 3.11. MALAKAL ...................................................................................................................................... 36 3.11.1. Malakal Town Port .............................................................................................................. 36 3.11.2. Malakal UN/WFP Port ........................................................................................................ 38 3.12. MELUT ......................................................................................................................................... 39 3.13. RENK ........................................................................................................................................... 41 4. THE ECONOMIC CASE FOR INVESTMENT IN RIVER TRANSPORT IN SOUTH SUDAN 43 4.1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 43 4.2. TRANSPORT NETWORK IN SOUTH SUDAN ....................................................................................... 43 4.2.1. Network Changes Since the Early 1980s ........................................................................... 43 4.2.2. Other Modes ....................................................................................................................... 44 4.3. HISTORIC DEMAND TO 2012 .......................................................................................................... 47 4.3.1. River transport from 1973 to 1993 ...................................................................................... 47 4.3.2. River Transport from 1993 to 2012..................................................................................... 49 4.4. LESSONS LEARNED FROM HISTORIC DEMAND ................................................................................ 50 4.5. CURRENT DEMAND FOR RIVER TRANSPORT TO SUPPLY HUMANITARIAN AID .................................... 51 4.6. DEMAND FORECASTS .................................................................................................................... 53 4.6.1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 53 4.6.2. Short-term Demand for Supply of Humanitarian Aid .......................................................... 53 4.6.3. Near to Long-term Forecasts for Demand for River Transport .......................................... 55 4.6.4. Importance of Resumption of Sudan-South Sudan River Transport .................................. 56 4.6.5. Study Near to Long-term River Transport Forecasts ......................................................... 56 4.7. REQUIRED BARGE CAPACITY TO MATCH NEAR-TERM FORECASTS .................................................. 60 4.8. PASSENGER TRANSPORT .............................................................................................................. 61 4.9. SUPPLY OF RIVER TRANSPORT SERVICES ...................................................................................... 61 4.9.1. Freight Rates and Costs ..................................................................................................... 61 4.9.2. River transport Operating Expenses .................................................................................. 62 4.9.3. Costs of Competing Modes of Transport ............................................................................ 63 4.9.4. Summary of costs per t-km ................................................................................................. 67 4.10. THE BENEFITS AND COSTS OF SHORT-TERM INTERVENTIONS .......................................................... 68 4.11. LONG-TERM AND WIDER BENEFITS OF IMPROVED RIVER TRANSPORT .............................................. 71 4.11.1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 71 4.11.2. Simplified Approach to Long-term Transport Benefits........................................................ 72 4.11.3. Wider Benefits .................................................................................................................... 72 4.11.4. The Long-term Case for Investment ................................................................................... 74 5. PROPOSED ACTIVITIES (OPTIONS CATALOGUE) ....................................................... 77 5.1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 77 5.2. DREDGING AND RIVER TRAINING.................................................................................................... 77 5.2.1. River Dredging (Width and Depth of Shipping Channel). ................................................... 77 5.2.2. Port Dredging ...................................................................................................................... 81 5.2.3. Assumptions and Limitations .............................................................................................. 81 5.2.4. Dredger Type ...................................................................................................................... 81 5.2.5. Dredged Material Disposal (Dredging Operation) .............................................................. 82 5.3. NAVIGATION AID SYSTEMS ............................................................................................................ 84 5.3.1. River Beacon Navigation Aides .......................................................................................... 84 5.3.2. Installation of the Equipment by Trained Local Staff .......................................................... 87 5.3.3. Technical Centres for Aids to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Training of the Upper Nile
    THE TRAINING OF THE UPPER NILE I PUBLISHED BY PITMAN WATER SUPPLY PROBLEMS AND DEVELOPMENTS By W. H. MAXWELL, A.M.Inst.C.E., Chartered Civil Engineer, Formerly Borough and Waterworks Engineer, Tunbridge Wells Corporation. In demy 8vo, cloth gilt, 337 pp., illustrated. 25s. net. WATERWORKS FOR URBAN AND RURAL DISTRICTS By HBNB-T C. ADAMS, M.Inst.C.E., M.I.M.E., F.S.I. In demy 8vo, 246 pp.* with 111 illustrations and 3 folding plates. 15s. net. RIVER WORK CONSTRUCTIONAL DETAILS By H. C. H. SHENTON, F.S.E., M.Inat.M. and Cy. E., F.R.San.I., F.R.San.E., and F. E. H. SHBNTON, M.S.E. In demy 8vo, cloth gilt, 146 pp. 12s. 6d. net. HYDRAULICS FOR ENGINEERS By ROBERT W. ANGUS, B.A.SC, M.E. In demy 8vo, cloth gilt, 336 pp. 12s. 6d. net. REINFORCED CONCRETE ARCH DESIGN By G. P. MANNING, M.Eng., A.M.Inst.C.E. In demy 8vo, cloth gilt, 200 pp. 18s. 6d. net. Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons, Ltd. Parker St. Kingsway, London, W.C.2 THE TRAINING OF THE UPPER NILE BY F. NEWHOUSE B.Sc, F .C.G.I., M.INST.C.E. Late Inspector-General of Egyptian Irrigation in the Sudan PUBLISHED IN OOLLABOBATION WITH THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS LONDON SIR ISAAC PITMAN & SONS, LTD. 1939 SIR ISAAC PITMAN & SONS, LTD. PITMAN HOUSE, PARKER STREET, KINGSWAY, LONDON, W.C.2 THE PITMAN PRESS, BATH PITMAN HOUSE, LITTLE COLLINS STREET, MELBOURNE ASSOCIATED COMPANIES PITMAN PUBLISHING CORPORATION 2 WEST 45TH STREET, NEW YORK 2O5 WEST MONROE STREET, CHICAGO SIR ISAAC PITMAN & SONS (CANADA), LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • Wartime Trade and the Reshaping of Power in South Sudan Learning from the Market of Mayen Rual South Sudan Customary Authorities Project
    SOUTH SUDAN CUSTOMARY AUTHORITIES pROjECT WARTIME TRADE AND THE RESHAPING OF POWER IN SOUTH SUDAN LEARNING FROM THE MARKET OF MAYEN RUAL SOUTH SUDAN customary authorities pROjECT Wartime Trade and the Reshaping of Power in South Sudan Learning from the market of Mayen Rual NAOMI PENDLE AND CHirrilo MADUT ANEI Published in 2018 by the Rift Valley Institute PO Box 52771 GPO, 00100 Nairobi, Kenya 107 Belgravia Workshops, 159/163 Marlborough Road, London N19 4NF, United Kingdom THE RIFT VALLEY INSTITUTE (RVI) The Rift Valley Institute (www.riftvalley.net) works in eastern and central Africa to bring local knowledge to bear on social, political and economic development. THE AUTHORS Naomi Pendle is a Research Fellow in the Firoz Lalji Centre for Africa, London School of Economics. Chirrilo Madut Anei is a graduate of the University of Bahr el Ghazal and is an emerging South Sudanese researcher. SOUTH SUDAN CUSTOMARY AUTHORITIES PROJECT RVI’s South Sudan Customary Authorities Project seeks to deepen the understand- ing of the changing role of chiefs and traditional authorities in South Sudan. The SSCA Project is supported by the Swiss Government. CREDITS RVI EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Mark Bradbury RVI ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR OF RESEARCH AND COMMUNICATIONS: Cedric Barnes RVI SOUTH SUDAN PROGRAMME MANAGER: Anna Rowett RVI SENIOR PUBLICATIONS AND PROGRAMME MANAGER: Magnus Taylor EDITOR: Kate McGuinness DESIGN: Lindsay Nash MAPS: Jillian Luff,MAPgrafix ISBN 978-1-907431-56-2 COVER: Chief Morris Ngor RIGHTS Copyright © Rift Valley Institute 2018 Cover image © Silvano Yokwe Alison Text and maps published under Creative Commons License Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 Available for free download from www.riftvalley.net Printed copies are available from Amazon and other online retailers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Greater Pibor Administrative Area
    35 Real but Fragile: The Greater Pibor Administrative Area By Claudio Todisco Copyright Published in Switzerland by the Small Arms Survey © Small Arms Survey, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva 2015 First published in March 2015 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without prior permission in writing of the Small Arms Survey, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organi- zation. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Publications Manager, Small Arms Survey, at the address below. Small Arms Survey Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies Maison de la Paix, Chemin Eugène-Rigot 2E, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Series editor: Emile LeBrun Copy-edited by Alex Potter ([email protected]) Proofread by Donald Strachan ([email protected]) Cartography by Jillian Luff (www.mapgrafix.com) Typeset in Optima and Palatino by Rick Jones ([email protected]) Printed by nbmedia in Geneva, Switzerland ISBN 978-2-940548-09-5 2 Small Arms Survey HSBA Working Paper 35 Contents List of abbreviations and acronyms .................................................................................................................................... 4 I. Introduction and key findings ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Country Profile – Ethiopia
    Country profile – Ethiopia Version 2016 Recommended citation: FAO. 2016. AQUASTAT Country Profile – Ethiopia. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Rome, Italy The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licencerequest or addressed to [email protected]. FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/ publications) and can be purchased through [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of South Sudan Request for an Extension of the Deadline For
    The Republic of South Sudan Request for an extension of the deadline for completing the destruction of Anti-personnel Mines in mined areas in accordance with Article 5, paragraph 1 of the convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Antipersonnel Mines and on Their Destruction Submitted at the 18th Meeting of the State Parties Submitted to the Chair of the Committee on Article 5 Implementation Date 31 March 2020 Prepared for State Party: South Sudan Contact Person : Jurkuch Barach Jurkuch Position: Chairperson, NMAA Phone : (211)921651088 Email : [email protected] 1 | Page Contents Abbreviations 3 I. Executive Summary 4 II. Detailed Narrative 8 1 Introduction 8 2 Origin of the Article 5 implementation challenge 8 3 Nature and extent of progress made: Decisions and Recommendations of States Parties 9 4 Nature and extent of progress made: quantitative aspects 9 5 Complications and challenges 16 6 Nature and extent of progress made: qualitative aspects 18 7 Efforts undertaken to ensure the effective exclusion of civilians from mined areas 21 # Anti-Tank mines removed and destroyed 24 # Items of UXO removed and destroyed 24 8 Mine Accidents 25 9 Nature and extent of the remaining Article 5 challenge: quantitative aspects 27 10 The Disaggregation of Current Contamination 30 11 Nature and extent of the remaining Article 5 challenge: qualitative aspects 41 12 Circumstances that impeded compliance during previous extension period 43 12.1 Humanitarian, economic, social and environmental implications of the
    [Show full text]
  • Download (PDF, 514.70
    SOUTH SUDAN Overview of spontaneous refugee returns 31 August 2019 Spontaneous refugee returnees by Country of Asylum 209,071 Overall Current Month Reported Spontaneous Uganda 92,093 44.0% Refugee Returnees* 3,096 Sudan 54,108 25.9% 15,945 recorded in August 2019 10,634 24.0% Ethiopia 50,220 2,332,097 South Sudanese 1,677 5,215 2.5% Refugees in host countries Kenya as of 30 June 2019 49 4,599 2.2% DRC ** 489 855,962 833,784 2,800 1.3% CAR ** 422,240 36 0.1% 118,067 102,044 Other Sudan Uganda Ethiopia Kenya DRC** ** CAR: Central African Republic; DRC: Democratic Republic of Congo 2019 spontaneous refugee return trend (1 Jan - 31 Aug): 73,085 *** Spontaneous0K refugee returnees50K by State100K of arrival 20,431 Eastern Equatoria 61,430 15,945 Jonglei 44,024 Unity 37,763 Upper Nile 23,919 9,262 Central Equatoria 18,981 6,000 6,480 9,538 4,600 Lakes 15,407 829 Western Bhar Ghazal 3,793 Western Equatoria 2,864 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Northern Bahr Ghazal 470 Warrap 420 ***Historical data might change retroactively due to late reporting and time required to triangulate information Spontaneous Refugee Returnees by county MANYO 11,350 SUDAN RENK 939 MELUT 54 MABAN FASHODA 19,524 UNITY 488 ABYEI 1,052 Upper Nile PARIANG MALAKAL UpperUpperUPPER NileNile ABIEMNHOM PANYIKAG 153 706 NILE 14 1,010 BALIET AWEIL NORTH RUBKONA 211 LONGOCHUK GUIT 293 TWIC MAYOM 18,351 1,077 4,877 319 5,069 FANGAK AWEIL WEST NORTHERN 256 LUAKPINY/NASIR RAGA 43 Northern Bahr el 27,860 1,090 BAHR EL GHAZAL KOCH MAIWUT 1,144 Ghazal GOGRIAL WEST NYIROL ULANG 5,202Unity
    [Show full text]
  • Note: This Information Should Be Use As a Reference and Not for Actual Air Operational Planning As Surface Conditions Change
    24°0'E 28°0'E 32°0'E 36°0'E N O T E : e l i N e t i h T H I S I N F O R M A T I O N S H O U L D B E U S E A S A R E F E R E N C E A N D N O T F O R A C T U A L W A I R O P E R A T I O N A L P L A N N I N G A S S U R F A C E C O N D I T I O N S C H A N G E R A P I D L Y . Renk RWY Heading: 01/19 RWY Dimension: 15 x 1,500 Surface: Murram O v e r f l o w C h a n Sudan n e l R . B i bb an e il N e it h R W . S a n g e i r R . el- Sam aa R . W e h f Paloich e t RWY Heading: 01/19 RWY Dimension: 30 x 3,000 Surface: Tarmack RWY Heading: 13/31 R . R A RWY Dimension: 50 x 900 . h Y m a a Surface: Compacted murram le r Yida RWY Heading: 06/24 R . T om RWY Dimension: 34 x 800 b Ajuong Thok ak Maban 10°0'N Surface: Black cotton 10°0'N ) RWY Heading: 15/33 b a Pariang r RWY Heading: 14/32 A RWY Dimension: 25 x 1,300 l- Oriny e r RWY Dimension: 50 x 900 h Surface: Hard ground a Upper Nile (B Surface: Murram RWY Heading: 06/24 R ir .
    [Show full text]
  • S O U T H S U D
    Nyala 5 Mukjar Gerger 1 0 Ed Damazin 2 Renk Renk y Edd El a Fursan Abu Al Deain Jibaiha M Rehed Al Birdi - Kadugli O v e r f l (North) o w C h n Tulus El Ferdous a n n e Nyimeri l o Kadugli El-Galhak i R . Bi (South) bba n t Buram Sudan Channels Programmed on All UN Radios R.S a a n g e i r ----------------------------------------------------------- c CH Primary Use o R . el R -Sam 01 Security Management Team aa l . W e h f Kurmuk e t Kurmuk 02 WFP Air Operations l Melut Paloich 03 UNHCR only e Poloich Melut W h i t 04 Simplex - UN Only e Kaya: N n i l e Athidway le R. Ya CH: 13 05 Simplex - NGO / UN n Upper Nile R Jemaam . Ahm ar 06 UN Security Calling a Yida: Yida Kaya Asosa Asosa 07 UN Working Higlig CH: 3, 13 Ajuong Yusuf Batil h Gendrassa Thok 08 UN Working R.A Doro/Maban c da Pariang r Jamjang Oriny Gendrassa: Oriny 09 NGO / UN Pariang Kodok Guel CH: 14 r R. 10 UN Security Calling K Guk s Bambesi r i ( i Abyei u Pariang: b B ah a r Y e Malakal: . e l-Ar Nyeel R a Wunkur 11 UN Working b ) CH: 11 Bunj: t Ajuong Thok: CH: 3, 6, 7, 9 Nyingaro Abyei Batil CH: 3, 9, 10 Timsaha CH: 3 12 UN Working a Abyei: Tonga Malakal 13 NGO / UN / UNAMID emergency help e Rummamier Tonga CH: 3, 8, 14 Rubkona: New Fangak 14 NGO / UN Juaibor ) l f Machar Marshes a a p z Abiemnhom r ha -G e el Z r CH: 7, 9 - h el Rubkona a r Udier 15 NGO / UN B a h Agok (B R Gok w .
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Nile State SOUTH SUDAN
    COMMUNITY CONSULTATION REPORT Upper Nile State SOUTH SUDAN Bureau for Community Security South Sudan Peace and Small Arms Control and Reconciliation Commission United Nations Development Programme Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands The Bureau for Community Security and Small Arms Control under the Ministry of Interior is the Gov- ernment agency of South Sudan mandated to address the threats posed by the proliferation of small arms and community insecurity to peace and development. The South Sudan Peace and Reconciliation Commission is mandated to promote peaceful co-existence amongst the people of South Sudan and advises the Government on matters related to peace. The United Nations Development Programme in South Sudan, through the Community Security and Arms Control Project, supports the Bureau strengthen its capacity in the area of community security and arms control at the national, state and county levels. The consultation process was led by the Government of South Sudan, with support from the Govern- ment of the Netherlands’ Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Cover photo: A senior chief from Upper Nile. © UNDP/Sun-ra Lambert Baj COMMUNITY CONSULTATION REPORT Upper Nile State South Sudan Published by South Sudan Bureau for Community Security and Small Arms Control South Sudan Peace and Reconciliation Commission United Nations Development Programme MAY 2012 JUBA, SOUTH SUDAN CONTENTS Acronyms ........................................................................................................................... i Foreword ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Water Resources of the Nile Basin
    Chapter 2 The Water Resources of the Nile Basin 500 Soroti (1914–2003) 400 300 200 100 Average monthly rainfall 0 JFMAMJ JASOND 25 KEY MESSAGES • The Nile Basin is characterized by high climatic • The headwater regions of the Nile are subject diversity and variability, a low percentage of rainfall to widespread soil erosion. Sediment yields are reaching the main river, and an uneven distribution particularly high in the Eastern Nile sub-basin, of its water resources. Potential evaporation rates which contributes 97 per cent of the total sediment in the Nile region are high, making the basin load. Most sediment is captured in reservoirs in The particularly vulnerable to drought. Sudan and Egypt, which leads to a rapid loss of • White Nile flows only contribute up to 15 per cent reservoir storage capacity. of the annual Nile discharge, but are fairly stable • The finite Nile flows are now fully utilized for throughout the year. The Eastern Nile region agricultural, domestic, industrial, and environmental supplies up to 90 per cent of annual Nile flows, but purposes, while water demand continues to rise its contribution is highly seasonal. steadily due to population growth and economic • Extensive regional aquifer systems holding development. substantial quantities of groundwater underlie the • Irrigated agriculture in Egypt and The Sudan Nile region. Some of the aquifers hold fossil water, represents the single most important consumer but others are recharged from precipitation over of the waters of the Nile, but the upper riparians the basin, or from irrigation areas and the baseflow are planning investments that will use the river’s of the Nile.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 6519 UNITED ARAB REPUBLIC RÉPUBLIQUE ARABE UNIE Et
    No. 6519 UNITED ARAB REPUBLIC and SUDAN Agreement (with annexes) for the full utilization of the Nile waters. Signed at Cairo, on 8 November 1959 Official text: Arabic. Registered by the United Arab Republic on 7 February 1963. RÉPUBLIQUE ARABE UNIE et SOUDAN Accord (avec annexes) relatif à la pleine utilisation des eaux du Nil. Signé au Caire, le 8 novembre 1959 Texte officiel arabe. Enregistré par la République arabe unie le 7 février 1963. 64 United Nations — Treaty Series 1963 [TRANSLATION 1 TRADUCTION 2] No. 6519. AGREEMENT 3 BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF THE SUDAN AND THE UNITED ARAB REPUBLIC FOR THE FULL UTILIZATION OF THE NILE WATERS. SIGNED AT CAIRO, ON 8 NOVEMBER 1959 As the River Nile needs projects, for its full control and for increasing its yield for the full utilization of its waters by the Republic of the Sudan and the United Arab Republic on technical working arrangements other than those now applied : And as these works require for their execution and administration, full agreement and co-operation between the two Republics in order to regulate their benefits and utilize the Nile waters in a manner which secures the present and future requirements of the two countries : And as the Nile waters Agreement concluded in 1929* provided only for the partial use of the Nile waters and did not extend to include a complete control of the River waters, the two Republics have agreed on the following : First THE PRESENT ACQUIRED RIGHTS 1. That the amount of the Nile waters used by the United Arab Republic until this Agreement is signed shall be her acquired right before obtaining the benefits of the Nile Control Projects and the projects which will increase its yield and which projects are referred to in this Agreement ; The total of this acquired right is 48 Mil liards of cubic meters per year as measured at Aswan.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Ethnic Groups in Southern Sudan Exact Representationw Ohf Iteh En Isleituation Ins Tehnen Acrountry
    Ethnic boundaries shown on this map are not an Distribution of Ethnic Groups in Southern Sudan exact representationW ohf iteh eN isleituation inS tehnen aCrountry. The administrative units and their names shown on this map do not imply White acceptance or recognition by the Government of Southern Sudan. Blue ") State Capitals This map aims only to support the work of the Humanitarian Community. Nile Renk Nile Sudan Renk Admin. Units County Level Southern Darfur Southern Shilluk Berta Admin. Units State Level Kordofan Manyo Berta Country Boundary Manyo Melut International Boundaries Shilluk Maban Sudan Fashoda Dinka (Abiliang) Abyei Pariang Upper Nile Burum Malakal Data Sources: National and State Dinka (Ruweng) ") boundaries based on Russian Sudan Malakal Baliet Abiemnhom Panyikang Map Series, 1:200k, 1970-ties. Rubkona Guit County Boundaries digitized based on Aweil North Statistical Yearbook 2009 Aweil East Twic Mayom ") Nuer (Jikany) Canal (Khor Fulus) Longochuk Southern Sudan Commission for Census, Dinka (Twic WS) Nuer (Bul) Statistics and Evaluation - SSCCSE. Fangak Dinka (Padeng) Digitized by IMU OCHA Southern Sudan Aweil West Dinka (Malual) Nuer (Lek) Gogrial East Unity Nuer (Jikany) Northern Bahr el Ghazal ") Luakpiny/Nasir Aweil Maiwut Aweil South Raga Koch Gogrial West Nuer (Jegai) Nyirol Ulang Nuer (Gawaar) Aweil Centre Warrap ") Tonj North Ayod Kwajok Mayendit Leer Dinka (Rek) Fertit Chad Nuer (Adok) Nuer (Lou) Jur Chol Tonj East ") Wau Akobo Western Bahr el Ghazal Nuer (Nyong) Dinka (Hol) Uror Duk Jur River Rumbek North Panyijar
    [Show full text]