DOCSLIB.ORG

A Guide to the 18Th National Assembly of Mexico's Institutional

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Guide to the 18Th National Assembly of Mexico's Institutional A Guide to the 18th National Assembly of Mexico’s Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) A PRE-ASSEMBLY REPORT OF THE CSIS AMERICAS PROGRAM, MEXICO PROJECT George W. Grayson November 2001 Policy Paper on the Americas A Guide to the 18th National Assembly of Mexico’s Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) A PRE-ASSEMBLY REPORT OF THE CSIS AMERICAS PROGRAM, MEXICO PROJECT George W. Grayson Policy Papers on the Americas Volume XII, Study 6 November 2001 CSIS Americas Program About CSIS For four decades, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has been dedicated to providing world leaders with strategic insights on— and policy solutions to—current and emerging global issues. CSIS is led by John J. Hamre, formerly deputy secretary of defense, who became president and CEO in April 2000. It is guided by a board of trustees chaired by former senator Sam Nunn and consisting of prominent individuals from both the public and private sectors. The CSIS staff of 190 researchers and support staff focus primarily on three subject areas. First, CSIS addresses the full spectrum of new challenges to national and international security. Second, it maintains resident experts on all of the world’s major geographical regions. Third, it is committed to helping to develop new methods of governance for the global age; to this end, CSIS has programs on technology and public policy, international trade and finance, and energy. Headquartered in Washington, D.C., CSIS is private, bipartisan, and tax- exempt. CSIS does not take specific policy positions; accordingly, all views expressed herein should be understood to be solely those of the author(s). © 2001 by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. All rights reserved. The CSIS Press Center for Strategic and International Studies 1800 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006 Tel: (202) 887-3119 Fax: (202) 775-3199 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: http://www.csis.org/ CSIS Mexico Project Leadership Sidney Weintraub, Acting Director, Americas Program Armand Peschard-Sverdrup, Director, Mexico Project M. Delal Baer, Chairman, Mexico Project Meghan Bishop, Research Assistant, Mexico Project © 2001 by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. All rights reserved. This report was prepared under the aegis of the CSIS Western Hemisphere Election Study series. Comments are welcome and should be directed to: CSIS Americas Program 1800 K Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: (202) 775-3299 Fax: (202) 466-4739 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: www.csis.org George W. Grayson Contents List of Tables .......................................................................................................2 Acknowledgments................................................................................................3 Section One: Introduction ....................................................................................4 Section Two: Key Players......................................................................................8 Section Three: Evolution of the Revolutionary Party............................................10 Section Four: Hot Issues and Hot Committees....................................................12 Section Five: Possible Significance of the PRI’s 18th National Assembly...............20 About the Authors .............................................................................................24 1 A Guide to the 18th National Assembly of Mexico’s Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) List of Tables Table 1. Chronology of Assembly Activities ..........................................................7 Table 2. State-by-State Breakdown of PRI Vote on July 2, 2000 .........................15 Table 3. PRI Performance in State and Local Elections.......................................16 Table 4. Governors, November 2001..................................................................18 Table 5. PRI Presidents and Secretaries-General, 1936–2001.............................18 2 George W. Grayson Acknowledgments I wish to thank Tess Owens, secretary in the Government Department of the College of William & Mary, for spending countless hours expertly typing and retyping this manuscript. Stacey Cooprider, another wonderful human being, deserves recognition for her tremendous contribution to the preparation of the text, as does Valerie Trovato, who expertly and gracefully manages William & Mary’s Government Department. Student assistant Amanda Potts did a yeoman’s job in revising various tables, and graduate student Andy Mack proved a superb proofreader. Mexico’s superb Federal Electoral Institute (IFE) provided incomparable help in obtaining the statistical information that helps to fill these pages. In particular, I am indebted to Jacqueline Peschard, Elecotoral Advisor, Lic. Manuel Carrillo Poblano, IFE’s first-rate chief of staff for international affairs, and to Carlos Navarro, Director of Electoral Studies and Political Agreements. Also assisting hugely in finding electoral and biographical data were Lic. Miguel Medina Hernández, director of the library of the Institutional Revolutionary Party, and the simpática staff member of the National Action Party’s social communications office-María Feliciana Alvarez. No matter how often I called, Ms. Alvarez immediately responded: “How can I assist you?-and she meant it! She is truly a jewel in her party’s crown and I trust that National Actions leadership will reward her with a huge private office in the party’s new headquarters. Lic. Heriberto Sánchez, a staff member in the PAN’s Electoral Action Section, provided hard-to- find results for state and local elections held on October 7. Long meals with Lic. Guillermo Máynez Gil and Professor Oscar Aguilar Asencio, two of Mexico’s most astute political observers, provided culinary and intellectual stimulation. They are both gold mines of knowledge and played a crucial role in helping me revise my roughly hewn early drafts. At a time when it’s fashionable to bash bureaucrats, I must say “muchas gracias” to all of the Mexican and U.S. public servants who held off-the-record conversations with me. Their observations were invaluable. This Guide would not have seen the light of day without the hard work, thorough commitment, and unparalleled professionalism of the Mexico Project’s Meghan Bishop, one of the most talented young professionals in Washington, D.C. At CSIS, I would also like to thank Amy Cougenour-Betancourt, Deputy Director of the Americas Program and the Publications Department for their editorial suggestions. With such bountiful assistance, the author must bear full responsibility for any errors that may have crept into these pages. George W. Grayson <[email protected]> 3 A Guide to the 18th National Assembly of Mexico’s Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) Section One: An Introduction to the National Assembly Why did PRI leaders decide to hold the party’s 18th National Assembly on November 17–20? Above all, the inauguration of Vicente Fox Quesada, candidate of the National Action Party (PAN), on December 1, 2000, converted the PRI into a rudderless boat, making eccentric circles on Mexico’s political waters. Since 1929, the revolutionary party had depended on the nation’s chief executive—who often transmitted his wishes through the secretary of government (Gobernación)—for its ideology, legislative agenda, leadership, dispute resolution, and general orientation. Suddenly, PRI officials faced a political foe in the Los Pinos presidential palace. Without the country’s president to function as its North Star, the party found itself adrift. The lack of direction sparked vicious infighting: Who was responsible for the loss of the presidency? Who was best suited to assume the party’s helm? What should be the PRI’s relationship with the Fox administration? What procedures should the PRI follow in reaching key decisions in the new environment? As if in denial because of losing the presidency, many party bigshots cast about for scapegoats. Some heaped scorn on their defeated standard-bearer, Francisco Labastida Ochoa, and on his ally, party president Dulce María Sauri Riancho. Others lambasted former president Ernesto Zedillo (1994–2000) for championing neoliberal policies deemed responsible for the erosion of the PRI’s grassroots support. Fox’s Political Difficulties Fortunately for priístas, Fox has encountered a series of political setbacks—some his doing, some not—that make one wonder whether a reverse Midas touch has affected him. First, after devoting his first four months to indigenous issues, he satisfied neither the Zapatista National Liberation Army (EZLN) nor opponents of autonomy and expanded opportunities for Indian communities. Second, the prominence given to Fox’s suggested extension of the unpopular value-added tax (IVA) to food, medicine, and books supplied detractors with an excuse to attack and attenuate his tax reform. This will postpone final action on both compromise legislation and the 2002 budget. Third, although a skilled vote winner, Fox has encountered difficulty in negotiating and bargaining with legislators to build consensus in the 500-member Chamber of Deputies and the 128-seat Senate. Fourth, Fox has faced criticism for his extensive international travel instead of, as some people feel, focusing on domestic priorities. In contrast to his predecessors Fox will have made an unprecedented 13 trips abroad, visiting upward of 25 countries during his first year at Los Pinos. Fifth, despite the progress Fox made toward a
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mexico's 2012 Elections
    Mexico’s 2012 Elections: Key Issues and Critical Questions Now and Beyond Eric L. Olson June 2012 1 About the Woodrow Wilson Center’s Mexico Institute The Mexico Institute seeks to improve understanding, communication, and cooperation between Mexico and the United States by promoting original research, encouraging public discussion, and proposing policy options for enhancing the bilateral relationship. A bi-national Advisory Board, chaired by José Antonio Fernández Carbajal and Roger W. Wallace, oversees the work of the Mexico Institute. The Institute maintains an ongoing focus on five key issues in U.S.-Mexico relations: Security Cooperation, Economic Integration, Migration and Migrants, Border Issues, Energy and Natural Resources. The views of the author do not represent an official position of the Woodrow Wilson Center. For questions related to the paper and for media inquiries please contact the author at 202-691-4336 or via email at [email protected]. Copyright Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars; Mexico Institute 2 Mexico’s 2012 Elections: Key Issues and Critical Questions Now and Beyond By Eric L. Olson SUMMARY: • Mexicans go to the polls on July 1st to elect a president for a single six-year term, 128 Senators, 500 Deputies, 6 governors and the Mayor of Mexico City.1 Polls suggest that the long-ruling PRI is poised to return to power after a 12-year hiatus.2 • Polls have consistently shown former PRI governor Enrique Peña Nieto with a commanding lead, lending a sense of inevitability to the campaign. Efforts by opponents to cast the return of the PRI as a step back to an “authoritarian” and “undemocratic” past have reduced the frontrunner’s lead slightly, but it appears that a plurality of Mexicans see Peña Nieto and the PRI as capable of delivering a better future.
    [Show full text]
  • Representación Muestral Para La Asignación De Tiempos Oficiales A
    SÍNTESIS INFORMATIVA FECHA: Septiembre 19 de 2011 OCHO COLUMNAS/PRIMERAS PLANAS “Libran Crucero de la muerte” “Sin empleo 83% de las indígenas en Hidalgo” “Panal busca que TEPJF les dé el triunfo en Huasca” “Iniciativa sobre aborto, una incógnita” “Burocracia se “come” el gasto” “Desnutridos ¡40 millones!” “Federación confunde en asuntos de seguridad” “J. Martínez paga 80 mil por renta del Hidalgo” “Lista la SSH para recibir el invierno, indica Noble” “México foco rojo en trata de personas” “Sale caro viajar en carretera” I N S T I T U C I O N A L El Independiente-Exige PRD, PAN y Panal reestructurar tribunal local: Los Partidos Acción Nacional (PAN) y de la Revolución Democrática (PRD) se sumaron a la postura de Nueva Alianza para reestructurar al Instituto Estatal Electoral (IEEH) así como apuntalar el juicio político contra el presidente del Tribunal Electoral de Hidalgo Alejandro Habib Nicolás. Yolanda Tellería, coordinadora de los diputados panistas en el Congreso local, se pronunció por ciudadanizar ambos organismos, ya que ve un sesgo hacia un partido político. Se pronunció por esperar a que termine la etapa de impugnación contra comicios de alcaldes para iniciar futuras reformas a la Ley Electoral. En esta postura coincidió el presidente del Partido de la Revolución Democrática (PRD) Pedro Porras, quien señaló como sano que los actuales consejeros del instituto sean renovados cuanto antes, previo a la elección de diputados locales. "No podemos ir con este consejo, porque vemos cómo reciben favores del sistema, desde una notaría para uno de ellos", declaró y agregó: "esos favores por supuesto los pagan cubriendo al PRI".
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf/DTEP-220.Pdf Dahl, R
    Revista de El Colegio de San Luis ISSN: 1665-899X ISSN: 2007-8846 El Colegio de San Luis A.C. Navarrete Vela, Juan Pablo; Espejel Espinoza, Alberto Composición de las dirigencias del Partido Acción Nacional, el partido Revolucionario Institucional y el Partido de la Revolución Democrática después de la alternancia política (2002-2016) Revista de El Colegio de San Luis, vol. VIII, núm. 17, 2018, Septiembre-Diciembre, pp. 163-236 El Colegio de San Luis A.C. DOI: 10.21696/rcsl8172018824 Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=426259425008 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Redalyc Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina y el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Composición de las dirigencias del Partido Acción Nacional, el partido Revolucionario Institucional y el Partido de la Revolución Democrática después de la alternancia política (2002-2016) Composition of the leaders of the National Action Party, the Institutional Revolutionary Party and the Party of the Democratic Revolution, after the political alternation(2002 -2016) Juan Pablo Navarrete Vela* Alberto Espejel Espinoza** Resumen Este estudio tiene el objetivo de determinar las características de las dirigencias nacionales del Partido Revolucionario Institucional, del Partido Acción Nacional y del Partido de la Revolución Democrática, así como la composición de estas. Se clasifica el tipo de liderazgo de los presidentes nacionales de dichos partidos políticos, el tipo de experiencia de estos, así como el tipo de acceso a las posiciones en los Comités Ejecutivos Nacionales.
    [Show full text]
  • Mexico's 2006 Elections
    Mexico’s 2006 Elections -name redacted- October 3, 2006 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov RS22462 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Mexico’s 2006 Elections Summary Mexico held national elections for a new president and congress on July 2, 2006. Conservative Felipe Calderón of the National Action Party (PAN) narrowly defeated Andrés Manuel López Obrador of the leftist Party of the Democratic Revolution (PRD) in a highly contested election. Final results of the presidential election were only announced after all legal challenges had been settled. On September 5, 2006, the Elections Tribunal found that although business groups illegally interfered in the election, the effect of the interference was insufficient to warrant an annulment of the vote, and the tribunal declared PAN-candidate Felipe Calderón president-elect. PRD candidate López Obrador, who rejected the Tribunal’s decision, was named the “legitimate president” of Mexico by a National Democratic Convention on September 16. The electoral campaign touched on issues of interest to the United States including migration, border security, drug trafficking, energy policy, and the future of Mexican relations with Venezuela and Cuba. This report will not be updated. See also CRS Report RL32724, Mexico-U.S. Relations: Issues for Congress, by (name redacted) and (name redacted); CRS Report RL32735,Mexico-United States Dialogue on Migration and Border Issues, 2001-2006, by (name redacted); and CRS Report RL32934, U.S.-Mexico Economic Relations:
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Leadership Elections of the Institutional Revolutionary
    A Guide to the Leadership Elections of the Institutional Revolutionary Party, the National Action Party, and the Democratic Revolutionary Party George W. Grayson February 19, 2002 CSIS AMERICAS PROGRAM Policy Papers on the Americas A GUIDE TO THE LEADERSHIP ELECTIONS OF THE PRI, PAN, & PRD George W. Grayson Policy Papers on the Americas Volume XIII, Study 3 February 19, 2002 CSIS Americas Program About CSIS For four decades, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has been dedicated to providing world leaders with strategic insights on—and policy solutions to—current and emerging global issues. CSIS is led by John J. Hamre, formerly deputy secretary of defense, who has been president and CEO since April 2000. It is guided by a board of trustees chaired by former senator Sam Nunn and consisting of prominent individuals from both the public and private sectors. The CSIS staff of 190 researchers and support staff focus primarily on three subject areas. First, CSIS addresses the full spectrum of new challenges to national and international security. Second, it maintains resident experts on all of the world’s major geographical regions. Third, it is committed to helping to develop new methods of governance for the global age; to this end, CSIS has programs on technology and public policy, international trade and finance, and energy. Headquartered in Washington, D.C., CSIS is private, bipartisan, and tax-exempt. CSIS does not take specific policy positions; accordingly, all views expressed herein should be understood to be solely those of the author. © 2002 by the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Documentos De Trabajo En Ciencia Política
    Documentos de Trabajo en Ciencia Política WORKING PAPERS ON POLITICAL SCIENCE Turnout in Mexico's Presidential Election: Evidence from the Mexico 2000 Panel Study By Alejandro Poiré, ITAM WPPS 2001-02 Departamento Académico de Ciencia Política 0. Abstract1 This paper uses data from the First Wave of the Mexican 2000 Panel Study to elaborate a calculus of voting model of turnout that seeks to address two puzzles resulting from the presidential election. Both the low aggregate level of turnout, and its stark partisan pattern run contrary to socio-economic, resource and mobilization models of participation, as well as to typical characterizations of abilities of Mexican parties to drive out the vote. Instead, this paper proposes a modified calculus of voting model which renders the following key results: While Vicente Fox was most likely to be trailing Francisco Labastida in voting intentions four and a half months before election day, he had by then already secured a more solid basis of support among voters identified with his own party than the one the PRI candidate had backing him. Also, the model shows that the greater the expected difference in the utility that a citizen would derive from her top ranked candidates, the more likely that she would actually cast a ballot. Likewise, the greater political engagement of a voter, as explained by his interest in politics, political knowledge, media exposure and the exogenous influence of party mobilization, the more likely that he would cast a vote. Mexicans with a greater level of trust in their peers were more likely to participate, and younger people showed a lower propensity to turn out, ceteris paribus, as were citizens living in an urban setting.
    [Show full text]
  • The US–Mexico Futures Forum 2011
    6 The U.S.–Mexico Futures Forum 2011 Sponsored by the Hewlett Foundation The border between Tijuana and San Diego. (Photo by Nathan Gibbs.) BERKELEY REVIEW OF LATIN AMERICAN STUDIES Spring – Summer 2011 7 U.S.–MEXICO FUTURES FORUM Global Crisis, Bilateral Response by Brian Palmer-Rubin risis has become a familiar theme in United States– CMexico relations today. Whether the epicenter of the crisis is north of the border (the ongoing economic calamity), south of the border (Mexico’s drug war), or beyond (global warming), unfolding events have reinforced the shared fates of these two countries. If the participants at the U.S.–Mexico Futures Forum on April 15 and 16 Human Rights Trilogy, by Rufino Tamayo. The original symbol of the Forum, — now in its 10th year — were not now in its 10th year. (Images courtesy of the Olga & Rufino Tamayo Foundation.) convinced of the urgency of these issues before coming to the event, administrations, which have had to losing the drug war and the inability they certainly faced a sobering navigate turbulent times over the of the center-left Partido de la series of discussions. Three topics past few years. Revolución Democrática (Party of were addressed in-depth: renewable Forum participants from the the Democratic Revolution, PRD) energy and climate change; Mexico’s United States were highly qualified to rally around a single candidate security crisis; and North America’s to offer insight during this crucial have cleared the path for the response to the emergence of juncture. Public policy experts, Partido Revolucionario Institucional China as a global economic power.
    [Show full text]
  • La Modernización De La Administración Pública En México
    120 Volumen, XLIV, Nº 3 (septiembre-diciembre 2009) La Modernización de la Administración Pública en México Instituto Internacional de Ciencias Administrativas ISSN: 0482-5209 www.inap.org.mx Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública, A.C. Km. 14.5, Carretera Federal México-Toluca, No. 2151, Col. Palo Alto, 05110, Cuajimalpa, D.F., México Tel. 5081-2614, e-mail: [email protected] REVISTA DE ADMINISTRACIÓN PÚBLICA 120 Volumen, XLIV, Nº 3 (septiembre-diciembre 2009) La Modernización de la Administración Pública en México Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública, A.C. 01pag legal e indice.indd 1 6/3/10 05:07:58 © Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública, A.C. Km. 14.5 Carretera Federal México-Toluca No. 2151 Col. Palo Alto, C.P. 05110 Delegación, Cuajimalpa México, Distrito Federal Teléfono 50 81 26 14 http://www.inap.org.mx [email protected] ISSN 0482-5209 Publicación periódica Registro número 102 1089 Características 210241801 Certificado de licitud de título número 2654 Certificado de licitud de contenido número 1697 Las opiniones expresadas en esta revista son estrictamente responsabilidad del autor. La RAP, el INAP o las instituciones a las que están asociados no asumen responsabilidad por ellas. Para reproducir los materiales publicados en la REVISTA DE ADMINISTRACIÓN PÚBLICA se requiere la autorización expresa y por escrito de la Dirección. 01pag legal e indice.indd 2 6/3/10 05:07:58 CONSEJO DIRECTIVO 2008-2010 José R. Castelazo Presidente Javier Barros Valero Manuel Quijano Torres Isidro Muñoz Rivera Vicepresidente Vicepresidente
    [Show full text]
  • Revista87.Pdf
    Inapem87.indb 2 27/03/14 23:16 Número 87, Enero-Abril, 2014 Temas de la Administración Pública a debate Instituto de Administración Pública del Estado de México, A.C. Inapem87.indb 3 27/03/14 23:16 © Revista IAPEM Instituto de Administración Pública del Estado de México, A.C. Directora de la revista: Guillermina Baena Paz Comité Editorial de la Revista: Hilda Aburto Muñoz (México), Ricardo Navarro Reyna (México), Luis Humberto Fernández (México), Fernando Ortega (Perú), Jordi Serra (España), Jorge Villegas (Acatlán), José Juan Sánchez González (México) Omar Guerrero Orozco (México) Av. Hidalgo Pte. núm. 503 Col. La Merced, Toluca, México C.P. 50080. Tels.: (01722) 213 4672, (01722) 213 4673, (01722) 213 4674 Correo electrónico: [email protected] Página web: www.iapem.org.mx ISSN 1665-2088 Certificado de Licitud de Título Núm. 6714 Certificado de Licitud de Contenido Núm. 6995 Certificado de Reserva de Derechos al Uso Exclusivo del Título: 04-2013-013012312200-102 Revista IAPEM, impresa en Ecatepec, México Abril, 2014 Los trabajos que aparecen en esta revista son responsabilidad de los autores y no necesariamente expresan el punto de vista del Instituto de Administración Pública del Estado de México, A.C. Inapem87.indb 4 27/03/14 23:16 Número 87, Enero-Abril, 2014 Temas de la Adminstración Pública a debate Presentación . 7 Guillermina Baena Paz Nuevo modelo de la administración pública mexicana Héctor Luna de la Vega . 11 Interacciones entre la Gobernanza y la Gobernabilidad Alejandro Anaya Huertas . 29 La gobernanza anticipatoria como solución, no como salida Guillermina Baena Paz . 55 En busca del carácter científico de política pública .
    [Show full text]
  • Presentación De Powerpoint
    GABINETE DEL PRESIDENTE ELECTO ANDRÉS MANUEL LÓPEZ OBRADOR 1 Edades de los principales funcionarios Se consideraron a 28 funcionarios de STP Luisa María Alcalde 31 alto nivel anunciados por el Presidente Electo. La lista se integra INFONAVIT Carlos Martínez Velázquez 33 con secretarios o funcionarios con SEDATU Román Guillermo Meyer Falcón 36 rango equiparable. CONADE Ana Gabriela Guevara 41 BIENESTAR María Luisa Albores 42 CULTURA Alejandra Fraustro Guerrero 45 Género de los funcionarios ISSSTE Luis Antonio Ramírez Pineda 48 SFP Irma Eréndira Sandoval 51 Hombres 17 60.7% IMSS Germán Martínez Cázares 51 Mujeres 11 39.3% SEMARNAT Josefa González-Blanco Ortiz-Mena 53 SENER Norma Rocío Nalhe García 54 INPI* Adelfo Regino Montes 55 SE Graciela Márquez Colín 55 SER Marcelo Ebrard Casaubón 58 SEDENA Luis Crescencio Sandoval González 58 CONACYT María Elena Álvarez-Buylla 59 PEMEX Octavio Romero Oropeza 59 CONAGUA Blanca Elena Jiménez Cisneros 60 SHCP Carlos Urzua 63 SEMAR José Rafael Ojeda Durán 64 SEP Esteban Moctezuma Barragán 64 SECTUR Miguel Torruco 67 SAGARPA Víctor Villalobos 68 JEFE DE OFICINA Alfonso Romo Garza 68 SEGOB Olga Sánchez Cordero 71 SALUD Jorge Carlos Alcocer Varela 72 SCT Javier Jiménez Espriú 81 CFE Manuel Bartlett 82 *Se creará el Instituto Nacional de Pueblos Indígenas en sustitución de la Comisión Nacional para el Desarrollo de los Pueblos Indígenas. 2 Formación de los principales funcionarios ¿Qué estudiaron los principales ¿De qué universidades funcionarios? egresaron? (considerando estudios de licenciatura o (considerando estudios de licenciatura o equivalente) equivalente) Derecho 7 UNAM 10 Economía 4 ITESM 3 Ing. Agrónoma 4 U. de Capingo 2 Administración… 1 ITAM 2 Administración Militar 1 Coleg.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhorto Dirigido a Senadores Y Senadoras Que Conforman La Mesa Directiva, La Junta De Coordinación Política Y Las Comisiones Dictaminadoras De La Lxiii Legislatura
    EXHORTO DIRIGIDO A SENADORES Y SENADORAS QUE CONFORMAN LA MESA DIRECTIVA, LA JUNTA DE COORDINACIÓN POLÍTICA Y LAS COMISIONES DICTAMINADORAS DE LA LXIII LEGISLATURA: URGE LEY GENERAL DE ARCHIVOS Se exhorta al Senado a la discusión y aprobación de una Ley General de Archivos congruente con los avances legislativos en materia de transparencia y acceso a la información. Senador Pablo Escudero Morales, Presidente de la Mesa Directiva Senador Fernando Herrera Ávila, Presidente de la Junta de Coordinación Política Senadora Cristina Díaz Salazar, Presidenta de la Comisión de Gobernación Senador Manuel Barbosa Huerta, Presidente de la Comisión de Estudios Legislativos Segunda En octubre de este año el Congreso de la Unión cumplió un año y ocho meses de retraso en el cumplimiento de los plazos establecidos por la reforma constitucional en materia de transparencia y acceso a la información que mandataban la promulgación de una Ley General de Archivos. Esta reforma estableció que dicha ley debía normar la organización y administración homogénea de los archivos en los tres órdenes de gobierno para determinar las bases de organización y funcionamiento del Sistema Nacional de Archivos. La gestión de los archivos públicos es condición indispensable para la materialización del derecho de acceso a la información y el deber de rendición de cuentas. Asimismo una incorrecta gestión puede minar la producción académica, histórica e investigativa. La gestión documental se refiere a documentos que testifican las decisiones públicas, tanto del pasado como del presente. De ahí la urgencia de una norma general y de un sistema nacional que se articule con los sistemas nacionales de fiscalización, transparencia y combate a la corrupción.
    [Show full text]
  • Ambition, Electoral Competition, and Legislative Representation in Mexico, 1997-2009 Yann P
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Political Science ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 1-31-2013 Ambition, Electoral Competition, and Legislative Representation in Mexico, 1997-2009 Yann P. Kerevel Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/pols_etds Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Kerevel, Yann P.. "Ambition, Electoral Competition, and Legislative Representation in Mexico, 1997-2009." (2013). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/pols_etds/8 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Political Science ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Yann P. Kerevel Candidate Political Science Department This dissertation is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication: Approved by the Dissertation Committee: Lonna Rae Atkeson , Chairperson Juan Pablo Micozzi Michael S. Rocca Kathryn Hochstetler James McCann AMBITION, ELECTORAL COMPETITION, AND LEGISLATIVE REPRESENTATION IN MEXICO, 1997-2009 by YANN P. KEREVEL B.A. Criminal Justice, Grand Valley State University, 2003 M.A. Latin American Studies, University of New Mexico, 2006 DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Political Science The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico December 2012 ii DEDICATION To Ruth Lucile Hollinger iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation could not have been written without the advice and support of a large number of wonderful people who have graciously dedicated their time and energy. First, I would like to acknowledge the invaluable feedback and support from Lonna Atkeson over the last four years.
    [Show full text]