Privatization and Its Discontents — the Evolving Chinese Health Care System David Blumenthal, M.D., M.P.P., and William Hsiao, Ph.D

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Privatization and Its Discontents — the Evolving Chinese Health Care System David Blumenthal, M.D., M.P.P., and William Hsiao, Ph.D The new england journal of medicine health policy reports Privatization and Its Discontents — The Evolving Chinese Health Care System David Blumenthal, M.D., M.P.P., and William Hsiao, Ph.D. For the first-time visitor, China is breathtaking — er makes its domestic affairs — and particularly, its a land of extraordinary vitality, unimaginable size, internal political stability — potentially important and outlandish contrasts. Its cities hum with en- for people around the globe. In that context, one of ergy, purpose, and impenetrable traffic jams chok- the most fascinating and important aspects of Chi- ing inadequate roadways. It is home to one quar- na’s recent history has been the evolution of its ter of the world’s population, and more and more health care system. As its economy boomed, in part of its 1.3 billion people have flocked into megalopo- by emulating Western economic methods, its health lises (such as Shanghai, with more than 16 million care system nearly imploded, partly because China people, and Beijing, with more than 13 million) that adopted (wittingly or not) the strategies of some dwarf anything in the Western world. And while U.S. proponents of radical health care privatization. those cities sprout soaring, glass-shelled skyscrap- Ironically, the citizens of the United States, a bastion ers and business centers that make even London of capitalism, now enjoy far more protection against and Paris look modest, much of the rural popula- the cost of illness than the citizens of China, a nom- tion, which numbers 900 million, lives in poverty inally socialist nation. As a result, China faces huge and desperation that are reminiscent of the world’s health care problems that make those of the United most forgotten regions. States seem almost trivial by comparison and that This complex reality reflects the enormous eco- constitute a major potential threat to China’s domes- nomic and political changes that are transforming tic tranquility. At the same time, with governmental China. Its gross domestic product (GDP) has grown coffers swollen by tax revenues from its booming at the extraordinary annual rate of 8 percent during economy, the Chinese have opportunities for health the past 25 years, and its economy is now among care improvement that Western policymakers can the world’s largest and most rapidly expanding.1 only envy. This combination of massive challenges Analysts routinely speculate that China will become and huge opportunities makes the Chinese health the dominant world power in the 21st century,2,3 care system a unique laboratory that Western health fulfilling the aspiration of its legendary and contro- care planners cannot afford to ignore. The choices versial revolutionary leader, Mao Tse-tung. Howev- that Chinese officials make now could profoundly er, the means of China’s ascendancy probably would affect their future ability to manage epidemics, such have infuriated Mao. Instead of adopting a socialist as epidemics of the severe acute respiratory syn- and collectivist strategy that relies on central gov- drome (SARS) and the feared avian influenza, that ernmental control and emphasizes social equality, could affect the welfare of humans everywhere. the Chinese have privatized their economy and de- This report reviews the history and current sta- centralized much governmental control to provin- tus of the Chinese health care system. It traces the cial and local authorities. And instead of putting health care changes that resulted from the privat- the interests of China’s rural peasants first, as Mao ization of the Chinese economy, the significant dif- advocated (his was a peasant revolution, starting in ferences in health care problems that emerged in China’s vast countryside), China’s current leaders China’s resurgent urban and neglected rural areas, have poured money into its cities and let rural areas and the strategies that China’s leaders are imple- languish. The results have been huge and growing menting to remedy those difficulties. The report disparities in the well-being of populations in ur- concludes with reflections on the implications of ban and rural areas and increasing social strife.4 these developments for U.S. and Western health care China’s transformation into a major world pow- systems. n engl j med 353;11 www.nejm.org september 15, 2005 1165 Downloaded from www.nejm.org at HARVARD UNIVERSITY on January 26, 2007 . Copyright © 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. The new england journal of medicine the recent history of china’s tled its apparently successful health care and public health care system — 1950 to 2002 health system overnight, putting nothing in its place. In retrospect, this startling and almost inexplicable After Mao Tse-tung and the Chinese Communist event seems to have been collateral damage from Party took control of China in 1949, they created a a much more carefully planned and successful pol- health care system that was typical of 20th-centu- icy strike: the privatization of China’s economy and ry communist societies that are now largely extinct. a general effort to reduce the role of Beijing’s cen- However, China added some unique features to meet tral government in China’s regional and local af- the needs of its huge peasant population and to take fairs. Only recently have Chinese authorities recog- advantage of ancient, indigenous medical practices. nized the pain and the massive disruption in health The government owned, funded, and ran all hos- care that they have caused. pitals, from large, specialized facilities (often serving Several specific decisions in the early 1980s cre- communist cadres) in urban areas to small town- ated China’s current health care turmoil. First, Chi- ship clinics in the countryside. The private prac- na dramatically changed the way it financed health tice of medicine and private ownership of health fa- care. It reduced the central government’s investment cilities disappeared. Physicians were employees of in health care services, as well as in many other pub- the state. In rural areas, the cornerstone of the health lic services. From 1978 to 1999, the central govern- care system was the commune, which was the crit- ment’s share of national health care spending fell ical institution in rural life. Communes owned the from 32 percent to 15 percent9 (Fig. 1). At the same land, organized its cultivation, distributed its har- time, the central government transferred much of vest, and supplied social services, including health the responsibility for funding health care services care, which was provided through the Cooperative to provincial and local authorities and required them Medical System. The Cooperative Medical System to provide that support through local taxation.10 operated village and township health centers that That had the immediate effect of favoring wealthy were staffed mostly by practitioners who had only coastal provinces over less wealthy rural provinces basic health care training — the so-called barefoot and laid the basis for major and growing dispari- doctors, who received much publicity in the West ties between investments in urban and rural health for their supposed effectiveness in meeting the care. In effect, the central government drastically needs of rural populations.5 Barefoot doctors pro- reduced its ability and commitment to redistribute vided both Western and traditional Chinese medi- health care resources from wealthy areas to poor cal care and also many public health services. areas of a huge and diverse country in which the From 1952 to 1982, the Chinese health care sys- overwhelming majority of the population lived in tem achieved enormous improvements in health the poor regions. Reduction in governmental sup- and health care.5 Infant mortality fell from 200 to port for the health care system also had the effect of 34 per 1000 live births, and life expectancy increased largely privatizing most Chinese health care facili- from about 35 to 68 years. These improvements also ties, forcing them to rely more on the sale of servic- reflected major investments in public health through es in private markets to cover their expenses after a highly centralized governmental agency modeled allocations from public sources declined. Public on the Soviet Union’s system of the early 1950s.6 hospitals came to function much like for-profit en- This public health apparatus achieved major gains tities, focusing heavily on the bottom line. The Chi- in controlling infectious diseases through immu- nese government informally sanctioned this privati- nization and other classic public health measures, zation of hospitals and clinics by ignoring it.11 such as improved sanitation and the control of dis- Second, the government imposed a system of ease vectors, including mosquitoes for malaria and price regulation that had dramatic, unintended ef- snails for schistosomiasis.5,7 By the beginning of fects. To ensure access to basic care, the government the 1980s, China was undergoing the epidemiolog- continued tight controls over the amount that pub- ic transition seen in Western countries: infectious licly owned hospitals and clinics could charge for diseases were giving way to chronic diseases (e.g., routine visits and services such as surgeries, stan- heart disease, cancer, and stroke) as leading causes dard diagnostic tests, and routine pharmaceuticals. of illness and death.8 But it permitted facilities to earn profits from new Then, in the early 1980s, China virtually disman- drugs, new tests, and technology, with profit mar- 1166 n engl j med 353;11 www.nejm.org september 15, 2005 Downloaded from www.nejm.org at HARVARD UNIVERSITY on January 26, 2007 . Copyright © 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. health policy reports gins of 15 percent or more.10 Furthermore, the gov- ernment modified its salary-based system of com- 50 pensating hospital physicians to include bonuses 40 determined according to the revenue the physicians generate for their hospitals.
Recommended publications
  • The Hippocratic Dilemmas Guanxi and Professional Work in Hospital Care in China
    China Perspectives 2016/4 | 2016 The Health System and Access to Healthcare in China The Hippocratic Dilemmas Guanxi and Professional Work in Hospital Care in China Longwen Fu and Cheris Shun-Ching Chan Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/7091 ISSN: 1996-4617 Publisher Centre d'étude français sur la Chine contemporaine Printed version Date of publication: 1 December 2016 Number of pages: 19-27 ISSN: 2070-3449 Electronic reference Longwen Fu and Cheris Shun-Ching Chan, « The Hippocratic Dilemmas », China Perspectives [Online], 2016/4 | 2016, Online since 01 December 2017, connection on 28 October 2019. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/7091 © All rights reserved Special feature China perspectives The Hippocratic Dilemmas Guanxi and Professional Work in Hospital Care in China LONGWEN FU AND CHERIS SHUN-CHING CHAN ABSTRACT: Patients mobilising guanxi (interpersonal relations) to gain access to hospital care is prevalent in post-Mao China. Yet few studies have centred on how medical professionals deal with guanxi patients. Based on ethnographic research and applying an analytical frame of Chi - nese guanxi developed by Fei Xiaotong (1992 [1948]) and Cheris Shun-ching Chan (2009), this article examines the dilemmas that Chinese phy - sicians face in weighing professional standards versus guanxi . We divide the patients into three general categories: patients without any guanxi , patients with weak to moderate ties with physicians, and patients with strong ties with physicians. We find that physicians face few di - lemmas when they interact with patients without guanxi . They largely adhere to their professional code of practice and generally display do - minance over the patients.
    [Show full text]
  • View Latest Version Here. the Challenge Of
    This transcript was exported on Jul 02, 2020 - view latest version here. Steven Goldstein: Good morning, good afternoon, good evening, wherever you are. My name is Steven Goldstein and I'm the director of the Taiwan Workshop at the Fairbank Center at Harvard University. And I'm very pleased today to moderate a round table on the COVID-19 virus and the experience in Taiwan. Let me just start off with a few thoughts. Taiwan appears to be the land of miracles. In the 1970s, when I was a grad... well, I was more than a graduate student, the Taiwan miracle was the economic transformation that took place in Taiwan, after the establishment of rule on the Island. In the two thousands, or in the turn of the 20th century, the Taiwan miracle was a political miracle. It was the democratization of an authoritarian regime. Steven Goldstein: And now people are talking of a third miracle Taiwan's response to the COVID-19 virus. You see the more I read about it, the more I see terms like gold standard being used to characterize the Taiwan experience. Miracle's not a good word, because every one of those miracles, including the miracle today has been the result of political leadership and societal participation. They're the result of policies led by political leaders with the participation and cooperation of the people. This was unquestionably the case in the first two miracles. And today it's becoming increasingly clear that the same holds for the present miracle. Political leadership, societal effort, combined with technological capabilities, social policies, government institutions have all played central roles in Taiwan's response.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. William Hsiao
    Distinguished Achievement Citation William Hsiao Class of 1959 With this presentation of Ohio Wesleyan’s Distinguished Achievement Citation, the Ohio Wesleyan University Alumni Association Board of Directors is honored and privileged to recognize William Hsiao and his career as a public administrator, humanitarian, and professor. He is considered one of the world's foremost experts on health care economics and financing. His advice to leaders of state and government both here and abroad has changed the lives of millions of people across the world. A native of Beijing, Dr. Hsiao graduated from OWU in 1959 with a degree in Physics and Math. Following graduation, he worked as an actuary for the Connecticut General Life Insurance Company. In 1968, Dr. Hsiao became Deputy Chief Actuary for the Social Security Administration where he led two blue-ribbon panels regarding the actuarial viability of the Social Security System. He left government service in 1971 and entered the graduate program at Harvard University where he obtained a Master of Public Administration, Master of Arts, and Ph.D. in Economics in 1982. During his studies, he served as a consultant to the U.S. House and Senate on Social Security. Dr. Hsiao was appointed to the faculty of the Harvard School of Public Health as an Assistant Professor in 1979 and became a full professor in 1986. He currently serves as the K.T. Li Professor of Economics at the Harvard School of Public Health. Dr. Hsiao regularly advises U.S. government agencies, foreign governments, and non-governmental organizations such as the World Bank, UNICEF, and the World Health Organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Gabriel M. Leung and John Bacon Shone
    (GLWHGE\ *DEULHO0/HXQJ DQG -RKQ%DFRQ6KRQH A Project of the Medical and Health Research Network The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong University Press The University of Hong Kong Pokfulam Road Hong Kong www.hkupress.org © 2006 Hong Kong University Press ISBN 978-962-209-804-6 (Hardback) ISBN 978-988-8139-55-2 (Paperback) All rights reserved. No portion of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 Printed and bound by CTPS Digiprints Ltd. in Hong Kong, China Contents Foreword ix Preface xi List of Contributors xv PART I Forces of Change 1 Part I Commentary History, Ethics and Forces of Change 3 John Bacon-Shone and Gabriel M. Leung 1. A Historical Review: The Colonial Legacy 17 Derek Gould 2. Philosophy, Ethics and Societal Values in Health System Reform 27 Marc Roberts 3. Confucian Care-Based Philosophical Foundation of Health Care 41 Julia Tao 4. Implications of the Demographic Transition 61 Paul Yip, Joseph Lee and C.K. Law 5. Changing Patient Expectations 81 Iris Chan and Mary Ann Benitez 6. Comparative Health System Models in East Asia 95 Ruiping Fan and Ian Holliday vi Contents 7. The Role of Public Health in Social Justice: The Next Steps in 109 Hong Kong Anthony Hedley PART II The Organisation and 135 Management of Health Care Parts II & III Commentary Organisational, Management and Quality of Care Issues 137 Gabriel M.
    [Show full text]
  • APBC 2013 Final Program
    Conference Program Image by Magnus Larsson under Creative Commons APBC 2013 | 1 Contents Welcome ....................................................................... 2 APBC 2013 Organization ............................................... 3 General Information ...................................................... 5 Keynote Speakers ..........................................................12 Conference Schedule .................................................. 14 Posters Index ................................................................. 21 Sponsors ........................................................................ 26 Notes ............................................................................. 28 2 | APBC 2013 APBC 2013 | 3 Welcome APBC 2013 Organization Dear APBC 2013 attendee, Conference Chair • Steven Jones, BC Genome Sciences Centre, Canada On behalf of the APBC 2013 organizing committee, it is a pleasure to welcome you in Vancouver, British Columbia. This is the 11th Asia-Pacific Bioinformatics Conference, and the first to extend to the Pacific coast of North America. Program Chair • S. Cenk Sahinalp, Simon Fraser University, Canada This year we will have 40 papers presented in APBC selected out of more than 100 submissions. We will also feature 3 distinguished plenary speakers Local Organizing Committee who will each provide salient insights into the application of next-generation • Inanc Birol, University of British Columbia, Canada DNA sequencing. Additionally, an industry panel on application of bioinformatics
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges for the Health Systems of China and India
    June 2008 O Volume 2 O Issue 3 PARDEE RAND GRADUATE SCHOOL Policy Insight Caring for a Third of the World’s Population Challenges for the Health Systems of China and India hina and India together have more than 2 ularly in improving birth outcomes and preventing Cbillion residents, accounting for nearly 40 communicable diseases. percent of the total world population. Over Overall, people in China live longer, healthier the past 50 years, both of these countries have made lives than people in India. The difference between substantial gains in health, including increases in women is larger than that for men, resulting in life expectancy, reductions in infant mortality, and part from the 10-fold greater maternal death rate Sai Ma, Ph.D. PRGS Alumna the eradication of several diseases. Yet China and for Indian compared with Chinese women.1 Assistant Scientist, Johns Hopkins University India still lag behind many countries on key mea- Significant differences exist in causes of death sures of health, and the health gains achieved have as well. In China, noncommunicable diseases, been uneven across subpopulations. particularly chronic obstructive pulmonary dis- Comparing the health systems in China and ease and cancer, account for 77 percent of all India illuminates the health challenges common to deaths. In India, however, more than 40 percent both nations as well as those that are distinct to of all deaths are due to communicable diseases— each of them. Such a comparison is also timely, as including HIV/AIDS, diarrhoeal diseases, respira- health care reform is high on the political agenda tory infections, and perinatal conditions (Liu, Rao, Neeraj Sood, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Act 128 Health System Reform Design
    Act 128 Health System Reform Design Achieving Affordable Universal Health Care in Vermont Submitted by WILLIAM C. HSIAO, PhD, FSA K.T. Li Professor of Economics Harvard University STEVEN KAPPEL, MPA Principal Policy Integrity, LLC JONATHAN GRUBER, PhD Professor of Economics Massachusetts Institute of Technology And a team of health policy analysts February 17, 2011 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank the more than 100 individuals who met or talked with us over the course of this study, sharing their views, ideas and insights on health reform in Vermont. Without their contributions, our work would not have been possible. _________ We would also like to thank the numerous Vermonters and Vermont organizations who provided thoughtful comments and insight during the public comment period. Their efforts helped make this report better, clearer and hopefully more useful to the State of Vermont. The comments pointed out some gaps, lack of clarity and inadequate analysis in our draft report. We are deeply grateful for these comments and have revised our draft report to improve the completeness and clarity of our analysis. The comments painted a clear picture of the diversity of views, of experiences with the health care system, of the deep feelings and beliefs about what a health care system should be, and the desire to do better for Vermonters. The comments also showed a sense of trepidation at the prospect of major systemic change, despite a general agreement over the unacceptability of the status quo. Health care touches us all, in personal, professional and economic ways. Major change brings uncertainties. We strongly believe, however, that Vermont can achieve its goals and set a model for the nation for an equitable, affordable, high-performing health system.
    [Show full text]
  • Via E-Mail to [email protected]
    Via e-mail to [email protected] February 3, 2011 William Hsiao, Ph.D. 124 Mt. Auburn Street, Suite 410 South Cambridge, MA 02138 Dear Dr. Hsiao: On behalf of Fletcher Allen Health Care, Vermont’s academic medical center, I would like to thank you and your team for the efforts you put into developing the draft Act 128 report issued on January 19. Despite the limitations placed on that work that you have described – a small budget and short timeframe – the draft report reflects a great deal of research, analysis and thoughtfulness. We also appreciate the many meetings you and your team hosted for so many stakeholders, including Fletcher Allen’s clinical and administrative leaders. We were pleased to see that many of the concepts that are common to the three major designs included in the report are ones that have been under discussion, or have been implemented in some form in Vermont, in the past several years. We at Fletcher Allen have been fully supportive of those reforms, and have already incorporated many of them into our operations and organizational culture. Those include: An integrated care system that includes ten primary care practices, a large multi- specialty physician practice (the University of Vermont Medical Group, physicians jointly employed by Fletcher Allen and the UVM College of Medicine), and a full spectrum of inpatient and outpatient care services. As recognized on pages 49 – 50 of the report, Fletcher Allen’s hospital service area is among the highest-performing in the three-state region discussed in the Tri- State Report commissioned by the Department of Banking, Insurance, Securities and Health Care Administration in 2010, including having the lowest per- member per-month costs; the lowest rates of Emergency Department visits, potentially-avoidable ED visits, and hospitalizations for ambulatory-sensitive conditions; and among the lowest hospital re-admission rates.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Hospital Management Survey – China
    Global Hospital Management Survey – China Management in Healthcare Report CONTENTS Contents .......................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary ......................................................................... 2 GHMS - China .................................................................................. 3 Public Hospital Reform in China ........................................................................... 3 Project Background............................................................................................... 5 Project Methodology ............................................................................................ 6 Pilot Study ....................................................................................... 8 Hospital Selection ................................................................................................. 8 Interview Selection ............................................................................................... 9 Summary Results ........................................................................... 10 Overall Hospital Management Score .................................................................. 10 International Comparisons ................................................................................. 11 Factors for Variation ........................................................................................... 13 Hospital Management in China .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Universal Health Coverage: the Case of China William Hsiao, Mingqiang Li and Shufang Zhang
    Working Paper 2014-15 Universal Health Coverage The Case of China William Hsiao, Mingqiang Li and Shufang Zhang prepared for the UNRISD project on Towards Universal Social Security in Emerging Economies: Process, Institutions and Actors November 2014 UNRISD Working Papers are posted online to stimulate discussion and critical comment. The United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD) is an autonomous research institute within the UN system that undertakes multidisciplinary research and policy analysis on the social dimensions of contemporary development issues. Through our work we aim to ensure that social equity, inclusion and justice are central to development thinking, policy and practice. UNRISD, Palais des Nations 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland Tel: +41 (0)22 9173020 Fax: +41 (0)22 9170650 [email protected] www.unrisd.org Copyright © United Nations Research Institute for Social Development This is not a formal UNRISD publication. The responsibility for opinions expressed in signed studies rests solely with their author(s), and availability on the UNRISD Web site (www.unrisd.org) does not constitute an endorsement by UNRISD of the opinions expressed in them. No publication or distribution of these papers is permitted without the prior authorization of the author(s), except for personal use. Contents Acronyms ......................................................................................................................... ii Summary .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Informal Conversation with Professor William Hsiao | Globalhealt
    An Economist’s Perspective on the U.S. Health Care System: An Inform... http://globalhealth.harvard.edu/news/economist’s-perspective-us-health-c... GOING GLOBAL PREPARING LEADERS WORLDWIDE WORK LATEST ACTIVITIES ABOUT HGHI Home » Latest Activities Informal Conversations with ... An Economist’s Perspective on the U.S. Health The HGHI Informal Conversation Series offers Care System: An Informal Conversation with faculty and students the opportunity to engage in dialogue on cutting-edge cross-disciplinary Professor William Hsiao issues, exploring new ideas, challenges, and opportunities that impact global health. Below Does Lipitor — $6 per dose in is the schedule of speakers for Fall 2013. New Zealand — really need to All series conversations take place from cost $124 in the U.S.?[1] Why 12-1:30 PM at the Harvard Global Health are Americans charged up to Institute, 104 Mt. Auburn Street, 3rd floor, five times more than patients in Cambridge, Massachusetts other countries for a Wednesday, October 30, colonoscopy or hip 2013 replacement? Why do just 40 Ahmed Ragab, PhD, MD, percent of American medical graduates choose to practice primary care Richard T. Watson when the ratio is 60 percent in Europe? Can ethics balance profit to Assistant Professor of shape an American health care system that is equitable, affordable, and Science and Religion, effective? Harvard Divinity School. Professor Ragab will be discussing the role of religion and culture in global health. These were just some of the provocative questions that Professor William Hsiao invited students, faculty, and staff to explore on November 21, Thursday, November 21, 2013, as part of the Harvard Global Health Institute (HGHI) "Informal 2013 Conversations," a series of roundtable luncheons that invites dialogue on William Hsiao, PhD, K.
    [Show full text]
  • A Unique Health Care System for Vermont
    The Vermont Option: Achieving Affordable Universal Health Care Submitted by WILLIAM C. HSIAO, PhD, FSA K.T. Li Professor of Economics Harvard University STEVEN KAPPEL, MPA Principal Policy Integrity, LLC JONATHAN GRUBER, PhD Professor of Economics Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a team of health policy analysts June 21, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Bidder Qualifications .................................................................................................................................... 3 I. Background .......................................................................................................................................... .. 4 I.1 Financing .......................................................................................................................................... 5 I.2 Payment ........................................................................................................................................... .. 8 I.3 Organization .................................................................................................................................... .. 9 I.4 Regulation ....................................................................................................................................... 1 0 II. Goals and Strategies ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]