Challenges for the Health Systems of China and India

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Challenges for the Health Systems of China and India June 2008 O Volume 2 O Issue 3 PARDEE RAND GRADUATE SCHOOL Policy Insight Caring for a Third of the World’s Population Challenges for the Health Systems of China and India hina and India together have more than 2 ularly in improving birth outcomes and preventing Cbillion residents, accounting for nearly 40 communicable diseases. percent of the total world population. Over Overall, people in China live longer, healthier the past 50 years, both of these countries have made lives than people in India. The difference between substantial gains in health, including increases in women is larger than that for men, resulting in life expectancy, reductions in infant mortality, and part from the 10-fold greater maternal death rate Sai Ma, Ph.D. PRGS Alumna the eradication of several diseases. Yet China and for Indian compared with Chinese women.1 Assistant Scientist, Johns Hopkins University India still lag behind many countries on key mea- Significant differences exist in causes of death sures of health, and the health gains achieved have as well. In China, noncommunicable diseases, been uneven across subpopulations. particularly chronic obstructive pulmonary dis- Comparing the health systems in China and ease and cancer, account for 77 percent of all India illuminates the health challenges common to deaths. In India, however, more than 40 percent both nations as well as those that are distinct to of all deaths are due to communicable diseases— each of them. Such a comparison is also timely, as including HIV/AIDS, diarrhoeal diseases, respira- health care reform is high on the political agenda tory infections, and perinatal conditions (Liu, Rao, Neeraj Sood, Ph.D. Economist, of both countries. and Hsiao, 2003)—which can be addressed by RAND Corporation Health systems include not just health care but more-effective health policies. also many other factors that affect health, such as 2. Ineffective Financial Risk Protection in Both poverty, education, nutrition, and sanitation. In Countries. Poor health can increase poverty and this Policy Insight, we focus our comparison along reduce material well-being through a number of two essential dimensions: health system goals pathways, including excessive medical expense, and the policy levers that are used to accomplish impaired labor market participation, and loss these goals. of productivity (Liu, Rao, and Hsiao, 2003). Unfortunately, the health systems in China and Goals India provide little protection from financial risk. The World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) 2000 In China, medical expenditures have become an report, Health Systems: Improving Performance, important cause of poverty, increasing the num- The Pardee RAND Graduate states that a health system should have three fun- ber of rural households below the poverty line School is a recognized damental objectives: (1) improving the health of leader in doctoral education by 44 percent (Liu and Rao, 2006). Similarly, in in policy analysis. Using a the population it serves, (2) providing financial multidisciplinary approach, India, up to a third of hospitalized patients are protection against the costs of poor health, and students and faculty examine impoverished by medical costs (Krishna, 2004, a wide range of policy issues, (3) responding to people’s expectations. How do including health, education, and Peters et al., 2002). energy, public safety, and national China and India fare in achieving these goals? and international security. The heavy burden of health costs in China Graduates pursue careers in 1. China Has Achieved More Gains in Health. universities, think tanks, public and India is not surprising, given the lack of service, government, and the While China and India face very different demo- well-developed health insurance schemes in both private sector. PRGS currently enrolls approximately 90 students, graphic and health challenges, both countries have countries. This situation is exacerbated by two drawn from more than 20 achieved substantial gains in life expectancy and countries around the world. the prevention of certain diseases since the 1940s. These improvements are reflected in the key health 1 Maternal death rates are correlated with rates of childbirth. Therefore, the indicators for each country shown in Table 1. The large difference in maternal death in the two countries is attributable to both better health care and Chinese women’s low fertility rate, a result of China’s gains in China have been more substantial, partic- “one-family-one child” policy. Table 1. Key Health Indicators Maternal Low-Birthweight Life Expectancy Probability of Dying (per 1,000) Death Rate Rate 0–1 Years Under 5 years old 15–60 Years Old (per 100,000) (%) Old Both Both Both Male Female Male Female Male Female 2000 1999 sexes Sexes sexes China 72 70 74 27 31 27 36 158 99 56 6 India 62 61 63 58 85 81 89 275 202 540 30 SOURCE: World Health Organization, The World Health Report 2006: Working Together for Health, 2006, and other WHO statistics. key factors. First, the lack of access to affordable in China has been on social or public insurance; care means that people defer preventive and other in contrast, India is betting on the emergence of necessary care; consequently, when they do seek private micro–health insurance. care, they typically have a more serious and costly 2. Payment. The fee-for-service (FFS) payment medical condition. Second, for those who seek care, method, in which health service providers are reim- physician-induced overutilization of care further bursed a fee for each service provided, dominates increases the financial burden of care. in both China and India. FFS creates incentives for 3. Consumer Satisfaction Understudied in the overuse of health care services, further increas- Both Countries. Consumer satisfaction has not ing the burden on consumers. In China, these been widely studied in either country, suggesting problems are exacerbated by the use of government- that perhaps neither country has yet employed administered price-setting rather than bilateral patient satisfaction as an important measure of negotiation between the government and providers. quality of care. In contrast, India’s government and professional associations have little influence on price-setting. Five Policy Levers for Improving Both countries face the challenge of reforming the Health Systems payment system to reduce overuse and to increase As William C. Hsiao (2003) argues, financing, pay- use of more cost-effective health care technologies. ment, organization of health care delivery, regula- Savings from such reforms could be passed on to tion, and behavior are the five essential policy levers consumers, reducing their health care expenses. in a health system, since they are the key forces for 3. Organization. influencing the ultimate performance of a health Starting in the late 1940s, both system and can also be affected by policy. Below, countries worked to develop public health care we compare China’s and India’s performance with systems that provided basic medical care, disease respect to each of the five policy levers. A summary prevention, and health education. Government of these comparisons is shown in Table 2. provision of health care was largely successful in China but less so in India. As a result, China expe- 1. Financing. Financing refers to the mechanisms rienced much larger gains in health through to the by which resources are mobilized to fund health- 1980s. In the 1980s, both countries faced pressure sector activities. Financing has the most important to increase the role of the private sector in providing and direct effect on the performance of a health health care services. India was more successful than system (Roberts et al., 2003). China in this, in large part because India’s private As Table 2 indicates, in both countries, the main sector was much more mature than China’s. mechanism for financing health care is individual However, the privatization of health care has had out-of-pocket spending, followed by general gov- negative effects in both cases. Citizens of both coun- ernment expenditures. Since out-of-pocket pay- tries now bear greater burdens and risks in financ- ment does not pool the financial risks associated ing their health care needs. In addition, the private with health care, it places heavy financial burdens sector has a greater incentive to provide curative on the poor and the sick and often bankrupts rather than preventive treatments. This reduction in patients and their families. In recent years, the attention to public health, especially on the preven- function of health insurance, either private or tion of communicable diseases and the promotion of social, as a way to pool risk has drawn policy- healthy lifestyles, may be one of the most important makers’ attention in both countries. The focus health issues emerging in each country. 2 Table 2. China and India: Policy Levers Used in Health Systems Policy Lever Indicator China India Total expenditure on health $61 $27 per capitaa (2003) % of GDP (2003) 5.6% 4.8% Out-of-pocket as a % of total 56% 73% Financing medical spending (2003) General government input as a % 36% 25% of total medical spending (2003) Health insurance Reliance on public insurance Emerging private micro-insurance Payment FFS Dominant; governments set price Dominant; providers set own price Public providers 96% 30% Organization Public providers 4% 70% Enforcement Many regulations, little enforcement Fewer regulations, little enforcement Regulation Regulatory structure Diffuse Very diffuse Behavior Education and promotion campaigns Somewhat effective Limited by illiteracy aPer capita total expenditure in U.S. dollars at average exchange rates. 4. Regulation. Regulation refers to the govern- from out-of-pocket to prepayment mechanisms ment’s use of coercive power to impose a full range is the key to reducing financial catastrophe.” of legal constraints on organizations and indi- This can be accomplished by providing nation- viduals (Roberts et al., 2003). Both countries lack alized or social insurance, as is common in a coherent regulatory framework for their health Europe, or encouraging private insurance, as is systems.
Recommended publications
  • The Hippocratic Dilemmas Guanxi and Professional Work in Hospital Care in China
    China Perspectives 2016/4 | 2016 The Health System and Access to Healthcare in China The Hippocratic Dilemmas Guanxi and Professional Work in Hospital Care in China Longwen Fu and Cheris Shun-Ching Chan Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/7091 ISSN: 1996-4617 Publisher Centre d'étude français sur la Chine contemporaine Printed version Date of publication: 1 December 2016 Number of pages: 19-27 ISSN: 2070-3449 Electronic reference Longwen Fu and Cheris Shun-Ching Chan, « The Hippocratic Dilemmas », China Perspectives [Online], 2016/4 | 2016, Online since 01 December 2017, connection on 28 October 2019. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/7091 © All rights reserved Special feature China perspectives The Hippocratic Dilemmas Guanxi and Professional Work in Hospital Care in China LONGWEN FU AND CHERIS SHUN-CHING CHAN ABSTRACT: Patients mobilising guanxi (interpersonal relations) to gain access to hospital care is prevalent in post-Mao China. Yet few studies have centred on how medical professionals deal with guanxi patients. Based on ethnographic research and applying an analytical frame of Chi - nese guanxi developed by Fei Xiaotong (1992 [1948]) and Cheris Shun-ching Chan (2009), this article examines the dilemmas that Chinese phy - sicians face in weighing professional standards versus guanxi . We divide the patients into three general categories: patients without any guanxi , patients with weak to moderate ties with physicians, and patients with strong ties with physicians. We find that physicians face few di - lemmas when they interact with patients without guanxi . They largely adhere to their professional code of practice and generally display do - minance over the patients.
    [Show full text]
  • View Latest Version Here. the Challenge Of
    This transcript was exported on Jul 02, 2020 - view latest version here. Steven Goldstein: Good morning, good afternoon, good evening, wherever you are. My name is Steven Goldstein and I'm the director of the Taiwan Workshop at the Fairbank Center at Harvard University. And I'm very pleased today to moderate a round table on the COVID-19 virus and the experience in Taiwan. Let me just start off with a few thoughts. Taiwan appears to be the land of miracles. In the 1970s, when I was a grad... well, I was more than a graduate student, the Taiwan miracle was the economic transformation that took place in Taiwan, after the establishment of rule on the Island. In the two thousands, or in the turn of the 20th century, the Taiwan miracle was a political miracle. It was the democratization of an authoritarian regime. Steven Goldstein: And now people are talking of a third miracle Taiwan's response to the COVID-19 virus. You see the more I read about it, the more I see terms like gold standard being used to characterize the Taiwan experience. Miracle's not a good word, because every one of those miracles, including the miracle today has been the result of political leadership and societal participation. They're the result of policies led by political leaders with the participation and cooperation of the people. This was unquestionably the case in the first two miracles. And today it's becoming increasingly clear that the same holds for the present miracle. Political leadership, societal effort, combined with technological capabilities, social policies, government institutions have all played central roles in Taiwan's response.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. William Hsiao
    Distinguished Achievement Citation William Hsiao Class of 1959 With this presentation of Ohio Wesleyan’s Distinguished Achievement Citation, the Ohio Wesleyan University Alumni Association Board of Directors is honored and privileged to recognize William Hsiao and his career as a public administrator, humanitarian, and professor. He is considered one of the world's foremost experts on health care economics and financing. His advice to leaders of state and government both here and abroad has changed the lives of millions of people across the world. A native of Beijing, Dr. Hsiao graduated from OWU in 1959 with a degree in Physics and Math. Following graduation, he worked as an actuary for the Connecticut General Life Insurance Company. In 1968, Dr. Hsiao became Deputy Chief Actuary for the Social Security Administration where he led two blue-ribbon panels regarding the actuarial viability of the Social Security System. He left government service in 1971 and entered the graduate program at Harvard University where he obtained a Master of Public Administration, Master of Arts, and Ph.D. in Economics in 1982. During his studies, he served as a consultant to the U.S. House and Senate on Social Security. Dr. Hsiao was appointed to the faculty of the Harvard School of Public Health as an Assistant Professor in 1979 and became a full professor in 1986. He currently serves as the K.T. Li Professor of Economics at the Harvard School of Public Health. Dr. Hsiao regularly advises U.S. government agencies, foreign governments, and non-governmental organizations such as the World Bank, UNICEF, and the World Health Organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Gabriel M. Leung and John Bacon Shone
    (GLWHGE\ *DEULHO0/HXQJ DQG -RKQ%DFRQ6KRQH A Project of the Medical and Health Research Network The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong University Press The University of Hong Kong Pokfulam Road Hong Kong www.hkupress.org © 2006 Hong Kong University Press ISBN 978-962-209-804-6 (Hardback) ISBN 978-988-8139-55-2 (Paperback) All rights reserved. No portion of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 Printed and bound by CTPS Digiprints Ltd. in Hong Kong, China Contents Foreword ix Preface xi List of Contributors xv PART I Forces of Change 1 Part I Commentary History, Ethics and Forces of Change 3 John Bacon-Shone and Gabriel M. Leung 1. A Historical Review: The Colonial Legacy 17 Derek Gould 2. Philosophy, Ethics and Societal Values in Health System Reform 27 Marc Roberts 3. Confucian Care-Based Philosophical Foundation of Health Care 41 Julia Tao 4. Implications of the Demographic Transition 61 Paul Yip, Joseph Lee and C.K. Law 5. Changing Patient Expectations 81 Iris Chan and Mary Ann Benitez 6. Comparative Health System Models in East Asia 95 Ruiping Fan and Ian Holliday vi Contents 7. The Role of Public Health in Social Justice: The Next Steps in 109 Hong Kong Anthony Hedley PART II The Organisation and 135 Management of Health Care Parts II & III Commentary Organisational, Management and Quality of Care Issues 137 Gabriel M.
    [Show full text]
  • APBC 2013 Final Program
    Conference Program Image by Magnus Larsson under Creative Commons APBC 2013 | 1 Contents Welcome ....................................................................... 2 APBC 2013 Organization ............................................... 3 General Information ...................................................... 5 Keynote Speakers ..........................................................12 Conference Schedule .................................................. 14 Posters Index ................................................................. 21 Sponsors ........................................................................ 26 Notes ............................................................................. 28 2 | APBC 2013 APBC 2013 | 3 Welcome APBC 2013 Organization Dear APBC 2013 attendee, Conference Chair • Steven Jones, BC Genome Sciences Centre, Canada On behalf of the APBC 2013 organizing committee, it is a pleasure to welcome you in Vancouver, British Columbia. This is the 11th Asia-Pacific Bioinformatics Conference, and the first to extend to the Pacific coast of North America. Program Chair • S. Cenk Sahinalp, Simon Fraser University, Canada This year we will have 40 papers presented in APBC selected out of more than 100 submissions. We will also feature 3 distinguished plenary speakers Local Organizing Committee who will each provide salient insights into the application of next-generation • Inanc Birol, University of British Columbia, Canada DNA sequencing. Additionally, an industry panel on application of bioinformatics
    [Show full text]
  • Act 128 Health System Reform Design
    Act 128 Health System Reform Design Achieving Affordable Universal Health Care in Vermont Submitted by WILLIAM C. HSIAO, PhD, FSA K.T. Li Professor of Economics Harvard University STEVEN KAPPEL, MPA Principal Policy Integrity, LLC JONATHAN GRUBER, PhD Professor of Economics Massachusetts Institute of Technology And a team of health policy analysts February 17, 2011 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank the more than 100 individuals who met or talked with us over the course of this study, sharing their views, ideas and insights on health reform in Vermont. Without their contributions, our work would not have been possible. _________ We would also like to thank the numerous Vermonters and Vermont organizations who provided thoughtful comments and insight during the public comment period. Their efforts helped make this report better, clearer and hopefully more useful to the State of Vermont. The comments pointed out some gaps, lack of clarity and inadequate analysis in our draft report. We are deeply grateful for these comments and have revised our draft report to improve the completeness and clarity of our analysis. The comments painted a clear picture of the diversity of views, of experiences with the health care system, of the deep feelings and beliefs about what a health care system should be, and the desire to do better for Vermonters. The comments also showed a sense of trepidation at the prospect of major systemic change, despite a general agreement over the unacceptability of the status quo. Health care touches us all, in personal, professional and economic ways. Major change brings uncertainties. We strongly believe, however, that Vermont can achieve its goals and set a model for the nation for an equitable, affordable, high-performing health system.
    [Show full text]
  • Via E-Mail to [email protected]
    Via e-mail to [email protected] February 3, 2011 William Hsiao, Ph.D. 124 Mt. Auburn Street, Suite 410 South Cambridge, MA 02138 Dear Dr. Hsiao: On behalf of Fletcher Allen Health Care, Vermont’s academic medical center, I would like to thank you and your team for the efforts you put into developing the draft Act 128 report issued on January 19. Despite the limitations placed on that work that you have described – a small budget and short timeframe – the draft report reflects a great deal of research, analysis and thoughtfulness. We also appreciate the many meetings you and your team hosted for so many stakeholders, including Fletcher Allen’s clinical and administrative leaders. We were pleased to see that many of the concepts that are common to the three major designs included in the report are ones that have been under discussion, or have been implemented in some form in Vermont, in the past several years. We at Fletcher Allen have been fully supportive of those reforms, and have already incorporated many of them into our operations and organizational culture. Those include: An integrated care system that includes ten primary care practices, a large multi- specialty physician practice (the University of Vermont Medical Group, physicians jointly employed by Fletcher Allen and the UVM College of Medicine), and a full spectrum of inpatient and outpatient care services. As recognized on pages 49 – 50 of the report, Fletcher Allen’s hospital service area is among the highest-performing in the three-state region discussed in the Tri- State Report commissioned by the Department of Banking, Insurance, Securities and Health Care Administration in 2010, including having the lowest per- member per-month costs; the lowest rates of Emergency Department visits, potentially-avoidable ED visits, and hospitalizations for ambulatory-sensitive conditions; and among the lowest hospital re-admission rates.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Hospital Management Survey – China
    Global Hospital Management Survey – China Management in Healthcare Report CONTENTS Contents .......................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary ......................................................................... 2 GHMS - China .................................................................................. 3 Public Hospital Reform in China ........................................................................... 3 Project Background............................................................................................... 5 Project Methodology ............................................................................................ 6 Pilot Study ....................................................................................... 8 Hospital Selection ................................................................................................. 8 Interview Selection ............................................................................................... 9 Summary Results ........................................................................... 10 Overall Hospital Management Score .................................................................. 10 International Comparisons ................................................................................. 11 Factors for Variation ........................................................................................... 13 Hospital Management in China .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Universal Health Coverage: the Case of China William Hsiao, Mingqiang Li and Shufang Zhang
    Working Paper 2014-15 Universal Health Coverage The Case of China William Hsiao, Mingqiang Li and Shufang Zhang prepared for the UNRISD project on Towards Universal Social Security in Emerging Economies: Process, Institutions and Actors November 2014 UNRISD Working Papers are posted online to stimulate discussion and critical comment. The United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD) is an autonomous research institute within the UN system that undertakes multidisciplinary research and policy analysis on the social dimensions of contemporary development issues. Through our work we aim to ensure that social equity, inclusion and justice are central to development thinking, policy and practice. UNRISD, Palais des Nations 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland Tel: +41 (0)22 9173020 Fax: +41 (0)22 9170650 [email protected] www.unrisd.org Copyright © United Nations Research Institute for Social Development This is not a formal UNRISD publication. The responsibility for opinions expressed in signed studies rests solely with their author(s), and availability on the UNRISD Web site (www.unrisd.org) does not constitute an endorsement by UNRISD of the opinions expressed in them. No publication or distribution of these papers is permitted without the prior authorization of the author(s), except for personal use. Contents Acronyms ......................................................................................................................... ii Summary .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Informal Conversation with Professor William Hsiao | Globalhealt
    An Economist’s Perspective on the U.S. Health Care System: An Inform... http://globalhealth.harvard.edu/news/economist’s-perspective-us-health-c... GOING GLOBAL PREPARING LEADERS WORLDWIDE WORK LATEST ACTIVITIES ABOUT HGHI Home » Latest Activities Informal Conversations with ... An Economist’s Perspective on the U.S. Health The HGHI Informal Conversation Series offers Care System: An Informal Conversation with faculty and students the opportunity to engage in dialogue on cutting-edge cross-disciplinary Professor William Hsiao issues, exploring new ideas, challenges, and opportunities that impact global health. Below Does Lipitor — $6 per dose in is the schedule of speakers for Fall 2013. New Zealand — really need to All series conversations take place from cost $124 in the U.S.?[1] Why 12-1:30 PM at the Harvard Global Health are Americans charged up to Institute, 104 Mt. Auburn Street, 3rd floor, five times more than patients in Cambridge, Massachusetts other countries for a Wednesday, October 30, colonoscopy or hip 2013 replacement? Why do just 40 Ahmed Ragab, PhD, MD, percent of American medical graduates choose to practice primary care Richard T. Watson when the ratio is 60 percent in Europe? Can ethics balance profit to Assistant Professor of shape an American health care system that is equitable, affordable, and Science and Religion, effective? Harvard Divinity School. Professor Ragab will be discussing the role of religion and culture in global health. These were just some of the provocative questions that Professor William Hsiao invited students, faculty, and staff to explore on November 21, Thursday, November 21, 2013, as part of the Harvard Global Health Institute (HGHI) "Informal 2013 Conversations," a series of roundtable luncheons that invites dialogue on William Hsiao, PhD, K.
    [Show full text]
  • A Unique Health Care System for Vermont
    The Vermont Option: Achieving Affordable Universal Health Care Submitted by WILLIAM C. HSIAO, PhD, FSA K.T. Li Professor of Economics Harvard University STEVEN KAPPEL, MPA Principal Policy Integrity, LLC JONATHAN GRUBER, PhD Professor of Economics Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a team of health policy analysts June 21, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Bidder Qualifications .................................................................................................................................... 3 I. Background .......................................................................................................................................... .. 4 I.1 Financing .......................................................................................................................................... 5 I.2 Payment ........................................................................................................................................... .. 8 I.3 Organization .................................................................................................................................... .. 9 I.4 Regulation ....................................................................................................................................... 1 0 II. Goals and Strategies ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Privatization and Its Discontents — the Evolving Chinese Health Care System David Blumenthal, M.D., M.P.P., and William Hsiao, Ph.D
    The new england journal of medicine health policy reports Privatization and Its Discontents — The Evolving Chinese Health Care System David Blumenthal, M.D., M.P.P., and William Hsiao, Ph.D. For the first-time visitor, China is breathtaking — er makes its domestic affairs — and particularly, its a land of extraordinary vitality, unimaginable size, internal political stability — potentially important and outlandish contrasts. Its cities hum with en- for people around the globe. In that context, one of ergy, purpose, and impenetrable traffic jams chok- the most fascinating and important aspects of Chi- ing inadequate roadways. It is home to one quar- na’s recent history has been the evolution of its ter of the world’s population, and more and more health care system. As its economy boomed, in part of its 1.3 billion people have flocked into megalopo- by emulating Western economic methods, its health lises (such as Shanghai, with more than 16 million care system nearly imploded, partly because China people, and Beijing, with more than 13 million) that adopted (wittingly or not) the strategies of some dwarf anything in the Western world. And while U.S. proponents of radical health care privatization. those cities sprout soaring, glass-shelled skyscrap- Ironically, the citizens of the United States, a bastion ers and business centers that make even London of capitalism, now enjoy far more protection against and Paris look modest, much of the rural popula- the cost of illness than the citizens of China, a nom- tion, which numbers 900 million, lives in poverty inally socialist nation. As a result, China faces huge and desperation that are reminiscent of the world’s health care problems that make those of the United most forgotten regions.
    [Show full text]