DOCSLIB.ORG

Act 128 Health System Reform Design

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Act 128 Health System Reform Design Achieving Affordable Universal Health Care in Vermont Submitted by WILLIAM C. HSIAO, PhD, FSA K.T. Li Professor of Economics Harvard University STEVEN KAPPEL, MPA Principal Policy Integrity, LLC JONATHAN GRUBER, PhD Professor of Economics Massachusetts Institute of Technology And a team of health policy analysts February 17, 2011 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank the more than 100 individuals who met or talked with us over the course of this study, sharing their views, ideas and insights on health reform in Vermont. Without their contributions, our work would not have been possible. _________ We would also like to thank the numerous Vermonters and Vermont organizations who provided thoughtful comments and insight during the public comment period. Their efforts helped make this report better, clearer and hopefully more useful to the State of Vermont. The comments pointed out some gaps, lack of clarity and inadequate analysis in our draft report. We are deeply grateful for these comments and have revised our draft report to improve the completeness and clarity of our analysis. The comments painted a clear picture of the diversity of views, of experiences with the health care system, of the deep feelings and beliefs about what a health care system should be, and the desire to do better for Vermonters. The comments also showed a sense of trepidation at the prospect of major systemic change, despite a general agreement over the unacceptability of the status quo. Health care touches us all, in personal, professional and economic ways. Major change brings uncertainties. We strongly believe, however, that Vermont can achieve its goals and set a model for the nation for an equitable, affordable, high-performing health system. _________ ii DISCLAIMER We would like to thank the many institutions and organizations that allowed us to use their data to conduct analyses vital to this report. Unless otherwise cited from a published report, the analyses and the responsibility for their accuracy and integrity are solely ours. Any conclusions and recommendations in this report are solely those of Dr. Hsiao and are not necessarily those of the institutions and organizations that provided data. Furthermore, we used the Gruber Microsimulation Model (GMSIM), developed by Jonathan Gruber at MIT and the Regional Economic Model Inc. (REMI), as conducted by Kavet, Rockler and Associates, LLC to analyze and estimate the impacts of potential reforms. However, Joanthan Gruber and Kavet, Rockler and Associates, LLC do not necessarily endorse the recommendations in this report. iii ABOUT THE AUTHORS Dr. William Hsiao, Ph.D., FSA is the K.T. Li Professor of Economics and director of the Health System Studies Program at Harvard University. Dr. Hsiao received his Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University and is a fully qualified actuary (i.e. Fellow, Society of Actuaries) with experience in private and social insurance. Dr. Hsiao has been a leading authority in health care financing for more than three decades and the World Bank regards him as the world’s premier authority on national health insurance programs. Dr. Hsiao played a leading role in the development of the United States Medicare and Medicaid Programs and national health insurance during the Nixon and Carter Administrations, and has been actively engaged in designing universal health insurance programs for many countries including Taiwan, China, Colombia, Poland, Cyprus, South Africa, and Uganda. Dr. Jonathan Gruber, Ph.D. is a Professor of Economics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where he has taught since 1992. His research focuses on the areas of public finance and health economics. Dr. Gruber’s Microsimulation Model was used to model the single payer options and public option in Vermont. He developed GMSIM over the past dozen years to provide objective and evidence-based modeling of the impact of health reforms on insurance coverage and costs. He was a key architect of Massachusetts’ ambitious health reform effort that widely expanded health insurance coverage to its residents. The GMSIM was the basis for the adoption of health reform in Massachusetts and it has also been widely used for state and federal health policy making, academic research, and private foundation analyses. In 2006, he became an inaugural member of the Massachusetts Health Connector Board, the main implementing body for that effort. In addition, Dr. Gruber has worked closely with governments in states such as California, Maryland, Minnesota, and Wisconsin to model reform options to expand health insurance coverage in these states. Mr. Steven Kappel, MPA is the founder of Policy Integrity LLC, which specializes in the development and evaluation of health policy. Mr. Kappel has been involved in the development of health data and health policy in Vermont for nearly 30 years. Since 1993, he has provided analytical support to both the legislature and executive branch on every health care reform initiative within the state. He has worked on the design and implementation of several major state data resources, including the hospital discharge data system, the state “Expenditure Analysis” and the Vermont Household Health Insurance Survey. He has worked extensively with both public and private-sector organizations in Vermont, including insurers, hospitals, the Vermont Program for Quality in Health Care, and several different state agencies. Mr. Kappel is also an adjunct instructor in health policy at the University of Vermont. He holds a Master’s Degree in Public Administration from the University of Vermont and is a graduate of the Vermont Leadership Institute. iv PROJECT STAFF, ANALYSTS, CONTRIBUTORS AND COLLABORATORS Anna Gosline, Project Manager Nicolae Done, Analyst Analysts from the Harvard School of Public Health Ashley Fox Nathan Blanchet Jeremy Barofsky Maxwell Behrens Jacob Bor Anthony Carpenter Bradley Chen Victoria Fan Catherine Hammons Bethany Holmes Heather Lanthorn Peter Rockers Susan Powers Sparkes Kristin Bevington Sue Gilbert Collaborators Ian Perry, MIT Nicolas Rockler, Kavet, Rockler and Associates Thomas Kavet, Kavet, Rockler and Associates Contributors from the State of Vermont Jennifer Carbee, Legislative Council Nolan Langweil, Joint Fiscal Office Robin Lunge, formerly of the Legislative Council Jim Hester, former Director, Vermont Health Care Reform Commission v TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................... ix 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 A. Principles and Goals of Act 128 ............................................................................................................................... 1 B. Current Problems in Vermont’s Health System ................................................................................................ 3 2. CONSTRAINTS to Reform in Vermont ........................................................................................................................ 7 A. Legal Constraint: ERISA .............................................................................................................................................. 8 B. Federal Constraint: PPACA ...................................................................................................................................... 12 C. Federal Constraint: Medicare and Medicaid ..................................................................................................... 14 D. Constraint: Stakeholder Analysis .......................................................................................................................... 17 E. Constraint: Provider Human Resources and Health Care Facilities Infrastructure ......................... 27 F. Constraint: Organizational & Administrative Capacity ................................................................................ 30 3. Design Principles & Strategies..................................................................................................................................... 32 4. Methods and Data ............................................................................................................................................................. 34 A. Estimation of Savings ................................................................................................................................................. 34 B. Estimation of Costs ..................................................................................................................................................... 64 C. The Gruber Microsimulation Model (GMSIM) ................................................................................................. 72 D. The Regional Macroeconomic Model (REMI) .................................................................................................. 76 5. PPACA Impacts................................................................................................................................................................... 78 6. Options 1A & 1B: Single Payer..................................................................................................................................... 84 A. Overview and Modeling Assumptions ...............................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • 2016 Community Health Needs Assessment

    2016 Community Health Needs Assessment

    2016 Community Health Needs Assessment A Triennial Report Summary Northridge Hospital Medical Center: 2016 Community Health Needs Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary……………….……………………………………………………………………………………………………... 3 Assessment Purpose and Organizational Commitment…..……….………………. ……………………………………………………. 9 Community Definition …………….……………………………..…………………………………………………………………….. 10 Demographic Profile ……….………….………………………………………………………………………………………. 12 Community Needs Index (CNI) ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 24 Assessment Process and Methods……………………..…………………………………………………………………………….….. 29 Assessment Data and Finding………………………..……………………………………………………………………… ………… 32 Prioritized Descriptions of Significant Community Health Needs……………………………………………………………………. 35 Community Resources………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 50 Impact: Actions Taken…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 51 Appendix A: Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 53 Appendix B: Demographic Tables…………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 55 Appendix C: Summary of Community Engagement……………………………………………………………………………….….. 67 CHNA Community Public Health and Community Health Expert Participants……….......................................................... 76 Appendix D: Community Engagement Survey Tools ………………………………………………………..……………………….. 81 Appendix E: List of Secondary Data Sources………. …………………………...…………………………………………….……. 95 Northridge Hospital Community Health Needs Assessment, May 2016 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY____________________________________________________________________________________
  • Health Policy Research Brief

    Health Policy Research Brief

    Health Policy Research Brief December 2009 Creation of Safety-Net-Based Provider Networks Under The California Health Care Coverage Initiative: Interim Findings Dylan H. Roby, Cori Reifman, Anna Davis, Allison L. Diamant, Ying-Ying Meng, Gerald F. Kominski, Zina Kally and Nadereh Pourat rganized provider networks have been developed as a method of achieving efficiencies in the delivery of health care, and to reduce problems such as limited access to specialty and tertiary care, fragmentation and duplication of services, low- Oquality care and poor patient outcomes. Provider networks are based on collaborative agreements between an array of providers offering a comprehensive range of services, bolstered with extensive administrative, structural and financial supports.1, 2 Standard components of networks include private practice and clinic-based physicians, hospitals, and ancillary service providers such as laboratory and diagnostic services. Service providers are organized and supported by an organization that administers important aspects of the network, including provider reimbursement, utilization management, quality assurance and health information technology (HIT).3, 4 Organized provider networks have been used efforts to develop effective networks based by commercial insurers as part of managed on safety-net providers. care, and are being adopted increasingly by Medicaid and Medicare as an important Inherent Challenges in the Safety Net aspect of an effective health care delivery In contrast to the private sector, networks system.5
  • Connecticut Medicaid: a Primer July 2010

    Connecticut Medicaid: a Primer July 2010

    Connecticut Medicaid: A Primer July 2010 By Signe Peterson Flieger, M.S.W. Medicaid Overview Medicaid has provided a health care safety net to millions of Americans since its enactment under Title XIX of the Social Security Act in 1965. In 2007, Medicaid provided health care coverage for almost 60 million Americans.1 With the recent passage of the national health reform law, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), Medicaid will continue to play a significant role in the expansion of health insurance coverage to many Americans. In its current form, Medicaid provides health care coverage for many low-income children and families who do not have access to employer-sponsored insurance, individuals with disabilities who lack private coverage or for whom adequate coverage is not available, and low-income seniors dually eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid.1 In addition, Medicaid is the largest payer of long-term care services, and finances more than 40 percent of overall nursing home and long-term care spending, including both institutional care and home and community-based services.1 Medicaid is jointly financed by the state and federal government as an entitlement program. States receive federal matching dollars at a rate based on state per capita income, with poorer states receiving more federal money. In contrast, the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) is a block grant program, so coverage can be denied for eligible children when the funding runs out.1 States receive higher federal matching rates for CHIP than for Medicaid. Participation in Medicaid and CHIP is voluntary, but all states, the District of Columbia, and the territories participate.
  • The Hippocratic Dilemmas Guanxi and Professional Work in Hospital Care in China

    The Hippocratic Dilemmas Guanxi and Professional Work in Hospital Care in China

    China Perspectives 2016/4 | 2016 The Health System and Access to Healthcare in China The Hippocratic Dilemmas Guanxi and Professional Work in Hospital Care in China Longwen Fu and Cheris Shun-Ching Chan Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/7091 ISSN: 1996-4617 Publisher Centre d'étude français sur la Chine contemporaine Printed version Date of publication: 1 December 2016 Number of pages: 19-27 ISSN: 2070-3449 Electronic reference Longwen Fu and Cheris Shun-Ching Chan, « The Hippocratic Dilemmas », China Perspectives [Online], 2016/4 | 2016, Online since 01 December 2017, connection on 28 October 2019. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/7091 © All rights reserved Special feature China perspectives The Hippocratic Dilemmas Guanxi and Professional Work in Hospital Care in China LONGWEN FU AND CHERIS SHUN-CHING CHAN ABSTRACT: Patients mobilising guanxi (interpersonal relations) to gain access to hospital care is prevalent in post-Mao China. Yet few studies have centred on how medical professionals deal with guanxi patients. Based on ethnographic research and applying an analytical frame of Chi - nese guanxi developed by Fei Xiaotong (1992 [1948]) and Cheris Shun-ching Chan (2009), this article examines the dilemmas that Chinese phy - sicians face in weighing professional standards versus guanxi . We divide the patients into three general categories: patients without any guanxi , patients with weak to moderate ties with physicians, and patients with strong ties with physicians. We find that physicians face few di - lemmas when they interact with patients without guanxi . They largely adhere to their professional code of practice and generally display do - minance over the patients.
  • View Latest Version Here. the Challenge Of

    View Latest Version Here. the Challenge Of

    This transcript was exported on Jul 02, 2020 - view latest version here. Steven Goldstein: Good morning, good afternoon, good evening, wherever you are. My name is Steven Goldstein and I'm the director of the Taiwan Workshop at the Fairbank Center at Harvard University. And I'm very pleased today to moderate a round table on the COVID-19 virus and the experience in Taiwan. Let me just start off with a few thoughts. Taiwan appears to be the land of miracles. In the 1970s, when I was a grad... well, I was more than a graduate student, the Taiwan miracle was the economic transformation that took place in Taiwan, after the establishment of rule on the Island. In the two thousands, or in the turn of the 20th century, the Taiwan miracle was a political miracle. It was the democratization of an authoritarian regime. Steven Goldstein: And now people are talking of a third miracle Taiwan's response to the COVID-19 virus. You see the more I read about it, the more I see terms like gold standard being used to characterize the Taiwan experience. Miracle's not a good word, because every one of those miracles, including the miracle today has been the result of political leadership and societal participation. They're the result of policies led by political leaders with the participation and cooperation of the people. This was unquestionably the case in the first two miracles. And today it's becoming increasingly clear that the same holds for the present miracle. Political leadership, societal effort, combined with technological capabilities, social policies, government institutions have all played central roles in Taiwan's response.
  • BOARD of GOVERNORS MEETING # 207 April 5, 2012 2:00 PM

    BOARD of GOVERNORS MEETING # 207 April 5, 2012 2:00 PM

    L.A. CARE HEALTH PLAN BOARD OF GOVERNORS MEETING # 207 April 5, 2012 ● 2:00 PM – 5:00 PM Vision A healthy community in which all have access to the health care they need. Mission To provide access to quality health care for Los Angeles County’s vulnerable and low income communities and residents and to support the safety net required to achieve that purpose. Values We are committed to the promotion of accessible, high quality health care that: • Is accountable and responsive to the communities we serve and focuses on making a difference; • Fosters and honors strong relationships with our health care providers and the safety net; • Is driven by continuous improvement and innovation and aims for excellence and integrity; • Reflects a commitment to cultural diversity and the knowledge necessary to serve our members with respect and competence; • Empowers our members, by providing health care choices and education and by encouraging their input as partners in improving their health; • Demonstrates L.A. Care’s leadership by active engagement in community, statewide and national collaborations and initiatives aimed at improving the lives of vulnerable low income individuals and families; and • Puts people first, recognizing the centrality of our members and the staff who serve them. BOARD OF GOVERNORS Thursday, April 5, 2012 (Meeting No. 207) 2:00 - 5:00 PM, L.A. Care Health Plan 1055 W Seventh Street, 10th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90017 All votes in a teleconferenced meeting shall be by roll call. Teleconference Information Call (866) 528-2256 Access Code 7485299 Teleconference Sites Honorable Gloria Molina G.
  • What Is Sustinet? of Interest

    What Is Sustinet? of Interest

    August 5, 2009 The Government Affairs Group at Murtha Cullina LLP is pleased to pro- vide information about current topics WHAT IS SUSTINET? of interest. David J. McQuade* 860.240.6141 By overriding Governor M. Jodi Rell’s veto of the SustiNet act, the Connecticut General As- [email protected] sembly took the first step in moving the state to a “system of universal healthcare” for all its Janemarie W. Murphy* citizens. As approved, Public Act 09-148, “An Act Concerning the Establishment of the Sus- 860.240.6143 [email protected] tiNet Plan,” calls for the creation of a new self-insured health plan to provide health services Michael J. Martone* to a gradually expanding pool of individuals in this state. Starting with the “voluntary” enroll- 860.240.6109 [email protected] ment of non-state public employees, nonprofit groups, and small businesses, the SustiNet Kylene A. Fredrick* Plan requires the state to include all clients of state supported health plans, including HUSKY 860.240.6040 A and B, Medicaid and the state-administered general assistance program; eventually ex- [email protected] panding services to state employees and retirees, the uninsured and larger employers. The Jason K. Crisco* 860.240.6185 act establishes July 1, 2012 as the target date for initial enrollments. [email protected] Establishment of the Plan * Not an Attorney Following a series of guidelines provided in the act, the SustiNet Plan will be developed by a nine-member board of directors. They are as follows: • The State Comptroller (serving
  • April 23, 2014 ILLINOIS' UPDATED MEDICAID CARE COORDINATION

    April 23, 2014 ILLINOIS' UPDATED MEDICAID CARE COORDINATION

    April 23, 2014 THIS WEEK IN FOCUS: ILLINOIS’ UPDATED MEDICAID CARE COORDINATION ROLLOUT CALIFORNIA PUBLISHES EXCHANGE ENROLLMENT REPORT INDIANA PROVIDES UPDATES ON UPCOMING MEDICAID MANAGED ABD RFP NEW YORK UPDATES ON MANAGED LTC AND DUALS DEMONSTRATION COLORADO REPORTS ON EXCHANGE ENROLLMENT UTAH AGREEMENT ON MEDICAID EXPANSION WITH CMS REPORTEDLY CLOSE UNITED, CENTENE REPORT FIRST QUARTER 2014 EARNINGS HMA UPCOMING APPEARANCE BY LYNN DIERKER, JUAN MONTANEZ, AND ALICIA SMITH IN FOCUS ILLINOIS’ UPDATED MEDICAID CARE COORDINATION ROLLOUT RFP CALENDAR This week, our In Focus section reviews an updated rollout plan for Illinois Medicaid’s care coordination initiatives. Under a 2011 Medicaid reform law (P.A. 96-1501) passed DUAL ELIGIBLES by the state’s legislature and signed by Governor Pat Quinn, the state’s Medicaid CALENDAR agency – The Department of Healthcare and Family Services (HFS) – is mandated to transition a minimum of 50 percent of all Medicaid beneficiaries into “care HMA NEWS coordination” by January 1, 2015. Shortly after the law was enacted, HFS determined that the state’s Medicaid Primary Care Case Management (PCCM) program, one of the Edited by: largest in the nation at more than 1.6 million enrollees, would not meet the definition of Greg Nersessian, CFA care coordination. Illinois’ care coordination transition is notable for both its scope and Email structure: Andrew Fairgrieve Email Rather than transitioning fully to a traditional Medicaid managed care program, HFS has, through a series of procurements, engaged provider-led care coordination entities (CCEs) and accountable care entities (ACEs) to operate alongside traditional Medicaid managed care organizations (MCOs). Illinois has moved first to transition the most complex recipients – aged, blind, and disabled and dual eligibles – into commercial managed care plans.
  • Provides the Following Authority to the Sustinet Partnership

    Provides the Following Authority to the Sustinet Partnership

    SustiNet Health Partnership Board of Directors Co-Chairs Phone: Nancy Wyman 866.466.4446 State Comptroller Facsimile 860.297.3992 Kevin Lembo E-Mail State Healthcare Advocate [email protected] Post Office Box 1543 Hartford, CT 06144-1543 www.ct.gov/SustiNet Implementing SustiNet Following Federal Enactment of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010: A Preliminary Report to the Connecticut General Assembly May 30, 2010 By: The SustiNet Health Partnership Board of Directors Nancy Wyman, State Comptroller, Co-Chair Kevin Lembo, State Healthcare Advocate, Co-Chair Hartford, CT Board of Directors Bruce Gould x Paul Grady x Bonita Grubbs x Norma Gyle x Jeffrey Kramer Estela Lopez x Sal Luciano x Joseph McDonagh x Jamie Mooney CT P.A. 09-148 §3(b)(16): “In the event of the enactment of federal health care reform, to submit preliminary recommendations for the implementation of the SustiNet Plan to the General Assembly not later than sixty days after the date of enactment of such federal health care reform” ii Table of contents Executive Summary........................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 3 State legislative context .................................................................................................................. 5 National reforms: A broad overview .............................................................................................
  • Climbing the Ladder to Universal Health Care

    Climbing the Ladder to Universal Health Care

    Climbing the Ladder to Universal Health Care January 25, 2018 Jill Zorn Senior Policy Officer jzorn@universalhealthct. org universalhealthct.org Climbing the Ladder to Universal Health Care • The vision: What is at the top of the ladder? • Core beliefs and values • Principles • Policy goals • The ladder: How do we get there? • State and Federal • Access and cost • Accountability and regulation • Defense and offense 2 Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticut: Who We Are And What We Do • 501(c)3 non profit “activist philanthropy” • Conversion foundation • Program • Advocacy: legislative, administrative, grass roots organizing • Public policy monitoring, research, and development • Communications • Grantmaking • Development 3 Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticut Mission Statement • To serve as a catalyst that engages residents and communities in shaping a democratic health system that provides universal access to quality, affordable health care and promotes health in Connecticut. • We believe that health care is a fundamental right and that our work is part of a broader movement for social and economic justice. 4 5 Universal Health Care Core Beliefs and Values • People have a right to health care and healthy communities • Excessive profits have no place in health care • Health care should be treated as a public good not as a market commodity • Government has a major role to play in financing coverage, regulating prices, enforcing quality standards and ensuring health equity 6 Universal Health Care Principles • Universal:
  • The Impact of Health Reform on Health System Spending

    The Impact of Health Reform on Health System Spending

    MAY 2010 Issue Brief The Impact of Health Reform on Health System Spending DAVID M. CUTLER, KAREN DAVIS, AND KRISTOF STREMIKIS The mission of The Commonwealth ABSTRACT: The health reform legislation passed in March 2010 will introduce a range Fund is to promote a high performance of payment and delivery system changes designed to achieve a significant slowing of health care system. The Fund carries health care cost growth. Most assessments of the new reform law have focused only on out this mandate by supporting the federal budgetary impact. This updated analysis projects the effect of national reform independent research on health care issues and making grants to improve on total national health expenditures and the insurance premiums that American families health care practice and policy. Support would likely pay. We estimate that, on net, the combination of provisions in the new law for this research was provided by will reduce health care spending by $590 billion over 2010–2019 and lower premiums by The Commonwealth Fund. The views nearly $2,000 per family. Moreover, the annual growth rate in national health expenditures presented here are those of the authors could be slowed from 6.3 percent to 5.7 percent. and not necessarily those of The Commonwealth Fund or its directors, RI¿FHUVRUVWDII +++++ OVERVIEW To judge the merit of the comprehensive health reform legislation recently signed For more information about this study, into law by President Obama, it is essential to understand its impact on the afford- please contact: ability of insurance coverage and overall health care spending. Most assessments David M.
  • Dr. William Hsiao

    Dr. William Hsiao

    Distinguished Achievement Citation William Hsiao Class of 1959 With this presentation of Ohio Wesleyan’s Distinguished Achievement Citation, the Ohio Wesleyan University Alumni Association Board of Directors is honored and privileged to recognize William Hsiao and his career as a public administrator, humanitarian, and professor. He is considered one of the world's foremost experts on health care economics and financing. His advice to leaders of state and government both here and abroad has changed the lives of millions of people across the world. A native of Beijing, Dr. Hsiao graduated from OWU in 1959 with a degree in Physics and Math. Following graduation, he worked as an actuary for the Connecticut General Life Insurance Company. In 1968, Dr. Hsiao became Deputy Chief Actuary for the Social Security Administration where he led two blue-ribbon panels regarding the actuarial viability of the Social Security System. He left government service in 1971 and entered the graduate program at Harvard University where he obtained a Master of Public Administration, Master of Arts, and Ph.D. in Economics in 1982. During his studies, he served as a consultant to the U.S. House and Senate on Social Security. Dr. Hsiao was appointed to the faculty of the Harvard School of Public Health as an Assistant Professor in 1979 and became a full professor in 1986. He currently serves as the K.T. Li Professor of Economics at the Harvard School of Public Health. Dr. Hsiao regularly advises U.S. government agencies, foreign governments, and non-governmental organizations such as the World Bank, UNICEF, and the World Health Organization.