Class of 1846-1847

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Class of 1846-1847 CLASS OF 1846. ~272 .. (Born at Sea) .. C. SEAFORTH STEWART · . ...(Ap'a N. J.) .... ~ Military History.- Cadet at the U. S. Military Academy from July 1, 1842, to July 1, 1846, when 11e was gradun,ted lind promoted in the Al:my to SECOND LIEu·r., CORPS OF ENGINEERS, J 'ULY 1, 18!G. Served: as Asst. Engineer in the eOHstmction of Ft. Trumbull, New London harbor, Ct., 1846-47, - anc1 of Ft.. W,wren, Boston ha-rbor, ]\fas., 1847- 49; ilt the l'ililitary Academy as Asst. Pl'Ofessor of Engineering, &Jp. 9, 1849, to Aug. 28. (FIRST LIEUT., CORPS OF ENGINENRS, JULY. 1, 1853) 1854; as Asst. Engineer in the cOllstruct.ion of Ft. Warren, Boston harbor, Mas., 1854- 57; il8 Buperiutenc1ing Engineer of the constrnction of Fts. Wn,r­ :Ii" Son of Chaplaiu SnwART, U. e. Navy. 140 GRADUATES OF THE 1846. CLASS RANK. ren, Independence, and 'Vinthrop, Boston harbor, Mns., 1857- 61,-and of (CAPTAIN, COIlPS OF ENGINEEIlS, JULY 1, 18GO, FOIl FOUIlTEEN YEAIlS' CONTINUOUS SEIlVICE) Great Brewster, and Deer Isbnd Sen-walls, Boston harbor, Mas., 1859- 61. Served during the Rebellion of the Seceding States, 1861- G6: as Asst. Engineer, Apr. 21 to Sep. 20, 18Gl, and Chief Engineer, Sep. 20, 1861, to Nov. 12, 1864" of the Defenses of H:nnpton Roads, Va.; in erecting field works at Newport News, May '27 to June 15, 1861; ill the Virginia PeninsulaI' Cam­ paign (Army of the Potomac), being engaged flS Asst. Engineer in the Siege of Yorktown, Apr. 21 - ~1ay 4, 1862, - BaWe of Williflmsburg, ThLl.y 5, 18G:.l,-nncl Reconnoitering with the Advance of t.he Anuy nnder Brig.-Geneml Stoneman, from ~Williamsburg to ThIechflnicsville, M:l)' 7 to June :3, 18G2, whon sickness compelled his return to .Ft. Monroe, Va. ; lIS Cunsulting Engineer during the <"fAJOIl, COIlPS OF ENGINKEIlS, "IAIl. 3, 18(3) Defense of Suffolk, Va., Apr. 24- 30, 18G3, ~- in t.he construction of the Defenses to COver Portsmouth and Norfolk, Va., l\hy-Junc, HlG3,- and on "!ajor-Gen­ • eml Dix's Expedition to White House, demonstrC1ting against Richmond, June 23 to J nly 8, 180:3; ill charge of the constl'l1ction of Defenses for the Camp for Rebel Prisoners of "Tar, at Point Lookout, lId., July 17 to Nov. 12, 18G4; as Chief Engineer of the fi'Iiddle Military Division, Nov. 18, 1864, to.June IG, 1865; (BVT. LIEUT.-COL., FED. 25, 1863, FOU LONG, F,UTHFUL, AND EFFICIENT SERVICES) (BVT. COJ'.ONEL, MAn. 13, 186.), FOIl GALL.\NT AND MEnITORIOVS SEIlVICES DURING TIm REBELLION: DECLlmm) on special duty in Baltimore and Cumbcrlall'l, "ld., June 22 to Aug. 16, 1865, and at Ft. Clinch, FI:I., Aug. 17 to Oct. 21 , 18G5; and in charge of the Dcfenses of DelawarA RiYer and Bay, Nov. 11, 1865, to ,- C1nd of the Harbor Improvemcnts of the Delaware, July, 1866, to (LIEUT.-COLONEL, CORPS OF E"'GI~EEllS, }!lAIl. 7, 1867) l.273 . (Born' Pa.} ....GEORGE B. McCLELLAN ....... (Ap'cl Pa.) .. 2 Military History.-Caclet at the U. S. Milit<u'y Academy from .Tuly I, 1842, to July 1, 1846, when he was graduated and promoted in the Anny to BVT. SECOND LmUT., COIlPS 01' ENGINEERS, ,JULY 1, 1846. Served: in the W,u with Th1exieo, 18·16-48, atblehed to the Comp:lllY of Sup­ pers, ~'1ill e l"S, a,nd Pontoniers, being engaged in opening the ROiLcl frolH ~1ata­ moras to Tampico, 1846-47,-Sioge of Vera Cruz, Mar. 9-29, 1847, - B"ttle of (SECOND LIEUT., CORPS 01)' ENGlNEEIlS, APR. 24, 1847) Cerro Gordo, Apr. 17-18, 18!7,- Skirmish of Amnzoque. Ma.y 1<1, 1847,- Bat­ tIe of ontreras, Aug. 19-20, 1847,-Battle of Chmubusco, Aug. 20, 1847,­ (Bn '. FmsT LIEUT., AUG. 20, 1847, FOR GALLANT AND ThIERITOIUOUS OONDUCT IN THE BATTLES OF CONTRER\S AND CHUllunusco, MEX.) constl'llcting B"aeries against Chapultepcc, Sep. 9- 1:3, 18·!7, - anc1 Assanlt and Capture of tne City~of Mexico, Sep. 13-1<1,1847; at West Point, N. Y., attached (Bv'f. CAPTAIN, SEP. 8, 1847, FOR GALLANT AND MERITOllIOUS CONDUCT IN THE BATTLE OF MOLINO DEL HEY, MEX.: DECLINED) (BVT. CAPTHN, SEP. 13, 18·17, FOR GALLANT AND "'lERITORIOUS CONDUCT IN THE BATTLE OF CHAPULTEPEC, MEX.) to Company of Engineer troops, 1848- 50, and in command, 1850- 51; as Asst. Engineer in building Ft. Dela.ware, 18;j1 - i;~; as Engineer of Exploring Expe­ dition to t1w sources of the Hed R.iver of Texas, 1852; as Chief Engincer of the Department of Texas, 1852,-ancl in charge of Survcys of rivers an(l h:n'bors on the Gulf Coast of Texas, It>52 - 53; as Engineer for Exploration and Snr­ U. S. :&IILITARY ACADEMY. 141 NUMBER. 1846. CL~SS RANK. vey of the Western Division of the projected Northern Pacific Railroad (FIRST LIEUT., CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JULY 1, 1853) through the Cascade Monnt.ains, 1853-54; on Special service, in collecting rail­ road stat.istics for the War Department, 1854- 5;3; and as Member of the Militl1l'Y (CAPTAIN, 1ST CAVALRY, iVIAR. 3, 1855) Commission to the "Theatre of 'YIll' in Europe," 1855- 56, his official report being published by order of Congress, 1857, embracing his remarks upon the Operations in the Crimea, and the OrganiZittioll, Iustruction, Equipment, &c., of European armies. RESIGNED, .JAN. 16, 1857. Civil History.- Translator from thc French of " Manual of Bayonet Exer­ cises," adopted for the use of the U. S. Army, 1852. Chief Engineer of IllinoiR Central Railroad, 1857-58,--alld Vice-President, 1858-60. President of St. Louis, Mo., and Cincinnati, 0., Railroad, 1860-6l. Member of several scien­ tific associations, 1853- 61. Military HistOl·y.-Served d11l'ing the Rebellion of the Seceding Stutes, (MAJOR-GENERAL, OHIO VOLUNTEERS, ApR. 23, 1861) 1861- 62: in command of the Department of the Ohio, Muy 13 to July 15, 1861, (MAJOR-GENERAL, U. S. ARMY, MAY 14, 1861) being engaged in the Action of Rich Mounb1in, W. Va., July 11, 186l.- ancl, by a forced march upon the Rebel camp, compelling Geneml Pegram's ~U1T()n­ der, near Beverly, W. Va., July 12, 1861;* in command. headquarters lit WaBh­ ington, D. C., of the Division of the Potomac, July 27, 1861, - of the Depll.rt­ ment of the Potomac, Aug. 17, 1861, - of the Army of the Potomac, Aug. 20, 18fil,- :md as GeneYIlI-in-Chief of the Armies of t.h e United States, Nov. 1, 1861, to Mar. 11, 18G~; in the Advance upon Manassas, Mar. 6-10, 1862 ; in command of the Army of the Potomac in the Virginia Pcninsula.r Campa.ign, Mar.- Aug. , 186:2, being engaged in the Siege of Yorktown, Apr. 5-lUay 4, 1862,-Occupatioll of Williamsburg, May 5- u, 1862,- B,tttlc of Fair Oaks, MIlY 31- June 1, 1862, -and the Battles of the Seven Days' change of base to the James River, June 26-July 2, 1862; in command of the Defenses of Wash­ ington, D. C., Sep. 2- 7, 1862; in the Maryland C'lmpaign, in command of the Army of the Potomac, Sep. 7 to Nov. 10, 186~, being engaged in the Battle of South l\Iountain, Sep. 14, 1862, - Battle of Antietfl,m, Sep. 17, lS62, - and March to 'Warrenton, Va., Oct.- Nov., 1862; and waiting orders at New York city, Nov. 10, 1862, to Nov. 8, 1864, during which time he waR 1I0minllted by the Chicago Convention as a Candidate tor President of the Unitetl Slates, but was defeated at the election in 1864, by President Abraham Lincoln. n.ESIG~ED, Nov. 8, 18&1. Civil History.-Residence in New York city till 18G5, and subsequently in Europe. 1274.. (Born N. H.) ., .. CHARLES E. BLUNT ...... (Ap'd at Largc) .. 3 Military History.- Cadct at the U. S. Military Academy from July 1, 1842, to .Tuly 1, 1840, when lle W(lS graduated and promoted in the Army to Bn'. SECOND Lmm·., CORPS OF ENGINEElIS, JULY 1,1846. Served: as Asst. Engineer in the construction of Ft. Winthrop, Boston har­ bor, Mas., 1846- 52, Ilnd 1853; and as Superintending Engineer of Survey of (SECOND LmUT., CORPS m' ENGI"'EERS, FEll. 28, 1848) * The thank ~ of Congress wore t endered to General McCJ.ELLA.N, July 16, 1861) for 'e the series of briUhat nnd dcciRivo victories" achieved by his army OV01' t.ho Robel.." "un the battle-fields of West.ern Virginia." 142 GRADUATES OF THE NUMBEI!. 1846. CLASS RANK. East Dennis Breakwuter. Mas., pl'eservation of'Vood's Hole and Provincetown harbors, Mas., and Tepairs of Hyannis lll'enkwatel', Mus., 1852,-of preserya­ tion of Plymouth lleach, Mus., 1853,- of the construction of Ft. Montgomery, Rouse's Point, N. Y., 1854- 61,-und of the TepaiTs of Ft. Wayne, Detroit, (FIRST LIEUT., CORPS OF ENGINEERS, FEB. 2, 1854) (C.HTAiN, CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JULY 1, 1860, FOR FOURTEEN YEAilS' CONTINUOUS SERVICE) Mich, an(l Fts. POTter, Niagara, and Ontario, N. Y., 1854-61. SeTved during the Rebellion of the Seceding States, 1861- 66: as Asst. Engineer ill the constru('t.ion of the Defenses of \Vashington, D. C., South of the Potom!l.c, May 4. to Nov. 20, 1861; as Superintclllling Engineer of the con­ struet.ion of the Dercn ses of Boston harbor, and Massachuset.t.Hllfty, N0\'. 20, 18Gl, to ,Tan. 16, 1865; in geneml charge of JTts. Porter and Niagara, N. Y. , C~fAJOn, Conps OF ENGINEERS, ULUl. 3, 1863) Noy. 20, 18(\1, to May 21, 1863, - 01' Ft. Montgomery, Noy. 20, 1861, to Sep.
Recommended publications
  • Third Edition
    Third Edition v3.0 CULVER CITY, CALIFORNIA Richard Di Giacomo graduated from San Jose State University with a BA in ancient and medieval history, a BA in social science, and an MA in American history. He has been a teacher for over 25 years and has taught at-risk and limited-English students and honors and college preparatory classes. The subjects he has taught include US and world history, government, econom- ics, Bible and ethics, history of the Cold War, and contemporary world history. He has been a reviewer of and contributor to textbooks, and a frequent presenter at social studies conferences on the use of simulations, videos, and computers in education. 10200 Jefferson Boulevard, P.O. Box 802 Culver City, CA 90232-0802 United States of America (310) 839-2436 (800) 421-4246 Fax: (800) 944-5432 Fax: (310) 839-2249 www.socialstudies.com [email protected] Editorial Assistant: Manasi Patel Graphic Designer: Joseph Diaz Editorial Director: Dawn P. Dawson © 2016 Social Studies School Service All Rights Reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Only those pages intended for student use as handouts may be reproduced by the teacher who has purchased this volume. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means—electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording—without prior written permission from the publisher. Links to online versions of print media are provided in the source information. Please note that these links were valid at the time of production, but the websites may have since been discontinued.
    [Show full text]
  • US Army Logistics During the US-Mexican War and the Postwar Period, 1846-1860
    CATALYST FOR CHANGE IN THE BORDERLANDS: U.S. ARMY LOGISTICS DURING THE U.S.-MEXICAN WAR AND THE POSTWAR PERIOD, 1846-1860 Christopher N. Menking Dissertation Prepared for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS December 201 9 APPROVED: Richard McCaslin, Major Professor Sandra Mendiola Garcia, Committee Member Andrew Torget, Committee Member Alexander Mendoza, Committee Member Robert Wooster, Outside Reader Jennifer Jensen Wallach, Chair of the Department of History Tamara L. Brown, Executive Dean of the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences Victor Prybutok, Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Menking, Christopher N. Catalyst for Change in the Borderlands: U.S. Army Logistics during the U.S.-Mexican War and the Postwar Period, 1846-1860. Doctor of Philosophy (History), December 2019, 323 pp., 3 figures, 3 appendices, bibliography, 52 primary sources, 140 secondary sources. This dissertation seeks to answer two primary questions stemming from the war between the United States and Mexico: 1) What methods did the United States Army Quartermaster Department employ during the war to achieve their goals of supporting armies in the field? 2) In executing these methods, what lasting impact did the presence of the Quartermaster Department leave on the Lower Río Grande borderland, specifically South Texas during the interwar period from 1848-1860? In order to obtain a complete understanding of what the Department did during the war, a discussion of the creation, evolution, and methodology of the Quartermaster Department lays the foundation for effective analysis of the department’s wartime methods and post-war influence. It is equally essential to understand the history of South Texas prior to the Mexican War under the successive control of Spain, Mexico and the United States and how that shaped the wartime situation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mexican General Officer Corps in the US
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Latin American Studies ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 12-1-2011 Valor Wrought Asunder: The exM ican General Officer Corps in the U.S.-Mexican War, 1846-1847. Javier Ernesto Sanchez Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ltam_etds Recommended Citation Sanchez, Javier Ernesto. "Valor Wrought Asunder: The exM ican General Officer Corps in the U.S.-Mexican War, 1846-1847.." (2011). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ltam_etds/3 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Latin American Studies ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Javier E. Sánchez Candidate Latin-American Studies Department This thesis is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication: Approved by the Thesis Committee: L.M. García y Griego, Chairperson Teresa Córdova Barbara Reyes i VALOR WROUGHT ASUNDER: THE MEXICAN GENERAL OFFICER CORPS IN THE U.S.-MEXICAN WAR, 1846 -1847 by JAVIER E. SANCHEZ B.B.A., BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO 2009 THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS LATIN AMERICAN STUDIES The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico December 2011 ii VALOR WROUGHT ASUNDER: THE MEXICAN GENERAL OFFICER CORPS IN THE U.S.-MEXICAN WAR, 1846-1847 By Javier E. Sánchez B.A., Business Administration, University of New Mexico, 2008 ABSTRACT This thesis presents a reappraisal of the performance of the Mexican general officer corps during the U.S.-Mexican War, 1846-1847.
    [Show full text]
  • I- ('A. Minor Professor
    AMERICAN ARTILLERY IN THE MEXICAN WAR 1846-18^7 APPROVEDj Major Profes&ot //I- ('a. Minor Professor of the Department of History / cr*- Dean of the Graduate School AMERICAN ARTILLERY IN THE KEXICAN WAR 18^6-18^7 THESIS Presented, to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By Lester R. Dillon Jr., B. A. Denton, Texas Kay, 1969 TABLE OF CONTENTS Fage LIST OF TABLES iv LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS v Chapter I. PRELUDE TO CONFLICT 1 II. CANNON AND CANNONEERS 1^ III. ARMY OF OCCUPATION 33 IV. THE HEARTLAND 60 V. ARTILLERY AND VICTORY 9° APPENDIX 102 BIBLIOGRAPHY 105 lii LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Organization of Scott's Army, March 18^7. ... 63 II. Organization of Scott's Army, August 18^7 ... 71 i v LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page 1. Theater of Operations 3 2. Field Cannon 16 3. Cannon Types and. Trajectories 19 Field Cannon and Carriage. , 21 5. Siege Cannon and Carriage . 21 6. Caisson and Limber 2^ 7. Tangent Scale 25 8. Gunner's Quadrant 25 9. Ammunition Types 28 10. Fort Brown to Point Isabel 35 11. Battle of Palo Alto. 38 12. Battle of Eecaca de la Palraa ^3 13. Battle of I-ionterey ^7 1^. Battle of Buena Vista 53 15. Siege of Vera Cruz 61 16. Vera Cruz to Mexico 66 17. Battle of Cerro Gordo . 68 18. Battle of Contreras, 7^ 19. Valley of Mexico 77 20. Kolino del Rey and Chapultepec 80 21.
    [Show full text]
  • 30 Days of History: Mexican-American War
    30 Days of History: Mexican-American War Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Causes of the War .................................................................................................................................. 6 Prelude to the Mexican-American War ................................................................................................ 8 America Prepares for War .................................................................................................................. 10 More Territorial Disputes ................................................................................................................... 12 Fighting Continues in the Southwest ................................................................................................ 14 Fighting in the Western Territories ................................................................................................... 16 Fighting Continues in California ........................................................................................................ 18 Battle of Dominguez Rancho ............................................................................................................. 20 General Kearny Goes to California .................................................................................................... 22 Battle of San Pasqual .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Enter Your Title Here in All Capital Letters
    WAR FLAGS INTO PEACE FLAGS: THE RETURN OF CAPTURED MEXICAN BATTLE FLAGS DURING THE TRUMAN ADMINISTRATION by ETHAN M. ANDERSON B.A., South Dakota State University, 2008 A THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF ARTS Department of History College of Arts and Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2010 Approved by: Major Professor Charles W. Sanders, Jr. Copyright ETHAN M. ANDERSON 2010 Abstract On September 13, 1950, in a culmination of three years of efforts by organizations and individuals inside and outside the Harry S. Truman administration, 69 captured battle flags from the Mexican-American War were formally returned to the Mexican government at a ceremony in Mexico City. The events surrounding the return of flags to Mexico occurred in two distinct phases. The first was a small, secretive, and largely symbolic return of three flags conceived and carried out by high-ranking U.S. government officials in June 1947. The second large-scale, public return of the remaining flags in the custody of the War Department was initiated by the American Legion and enacted by the United States Congress. Despite their differences, both returns were heavily influenced by contemporary events, primarily the presidential election of 1948 and the escalation of the Cold War. Also, although the second return was much more extensive than the President originally intended, it was only through his full support that either return was accomplished. In the decades since 1950, historians have either ignored the return of Mexican battle flags or focused instead on Truman’s wreath laying at the monument to the niños héroes in Mexico City in March 1947.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee and Indiana Volunteers in the Mexican War
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 5-2003 "That spirit of chivalry" : Tennessee and Indiana volunteers in the Mexican War Tyler Vincent Johnson Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Recommended Citation Johnson, Tyler Vincent, ""That spirit of chivalry" : Tennessee and Indiana volunteers in the Mexican War. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2003. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/5242 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Tyler Vincent Johnson entitled ""That spirit of chivalry" : Tennessee and Indiana volunteers in the Mexican War." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in History. Paul Bergeron, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Tyler Johnson entitled "�That spirit of chivalry': Tennessee and Indiana Volunteers in the Mexican War." I have examined the finalpaper copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillmentof the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in History.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Chapultepec (September 13, 1847)
    The Battle of Chapultepec (September 13, 1847) Toward the end of the Mexican War n 1857, as part of Captain Montgomery C. Meigs’s program to (1846–48), U.S. forces marched into the decorate rooms in the newly constructed Capitol extension, James interior of Mexico, intent upon capturing the capital city. The western approach to Walker was commissioned to recount in oil on canvas the Amer­ Mexico City was protected by Chapul­ ican capture of the Mexican fortress at Chapultepec. The tepec, a fortified hill that rose some commission’s execution was briefly delayed when 200 feet above the city plain. Congress passed a bill requiring that all works of art for Atop this rocky bluff stood the fortress I of Chapultepec, once a palace, but now the extension be selected by a commission of three used as the Mexican military academy. On distinguished artists and approved by the Joint Com­ the morning of September 13, 1847, after a day’s bombardment, General Winfield mittee on the Library. The project proceeded, how- Scott ordered American troops to storm the ever, and the painting was delivered to the Capitol fortification. By mid-morning, General in 1862. Walker received $6,137.37 for his work. Nicolás Bravo and his Mexican troops remaining in the citadel, including the Evidence suggests that the picture was originally cadets of the academy, capitulated. Six commissioned for use in the meeting room of the of the teenage cadets, who chose death House Military Affairs Committee. However, with rather than surrender, are honored for their courage to this day in Mexico as the the decision to engage Seth Eastman to create the Niños Héroes (boy heroes).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 17 Powerpoint
    Chapter 17- Manifest Destiny and War -By the mid-1800s, many Americans held the belief that the American continent, Manifest Destiny from the Atlantic to the Pacific, was theirs for the taking, an idea known as manifest destiny, a term coined by New York publisher John O’Sullivan. Americans believed themselves to be culturally, politically, and economically superior to other cultures and countries, and thus, the United States should be the dominant power in the Americas. -This belief was partially based in America’s Christian roots, which gave rise to the idea that America was a “gift” from God himself and that Americans were his “chosen” people, much like the Hebrews were granted the land of Canaan in the Bible. The Second Great Awakening helped fuel this desire to spread Christianity across the continent. -Politically, Americans believed themselves to be “special”, an idea today called “American Exceptionalism”. As the world’s first truly democratic republic, based on ideas such as popular sovereignty and natural rights philosophy, Americans believed they had a duty to spread democracy, liberty, and freedom across the American continent. -The most compelling reasons for westward expansion were economic. As urban populations grew in the East, and as more immigrants flooded into the country from European countries like Ireland and Germany, the demand for land in the West increased. Many argued that by settlers moving West, it decreased the pressure that large, ethnically diverse populations put on Eastern cities, and westward expansion would help alleviate problems that plagued urban areas: poverty, crime, ethnic tension, etc. Additionally, many saw the west as a perfect opportunity to expand the country’s agricultural wealth, especially slave-based plantation agriculture and the production of cash crops like cotton.
    [Show full text]
  • "Swallowing Mexico Without Any Grease": the Absence of Controversy Over the Feasibility of Annexing All Mexico, 1847--1848
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Master's Theses and Capstones Student Scholarship Spring 2008 "Swallowing Mexico without any grease": The absence of controversy over the feasibility of annexing all Mexico, 1847--1848 Timothy Evans Buttram University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis Recommended Citation Buttram, Timothy Evans, ""Swallowing Mexico without any grease": The absence of controversy over the feasibility of annexing all Mexico, 1847--1848" (2008). Master's Theses and Capstones. 71. https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis/71 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses and Capstones by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "SWALLOWING MEXICO WITHOUT ANY GREASE": THE ABSENCE OF CONTROVERSY OVER THE FEASIBILITY OF ANNEXING ALL MEXICO, 1847-1848 BY TIMOTHY EVANS BUTTRAM BA, University of New Hampshire, 2002 THESIS Submitted to the University of New Hampshire in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in History May 2008 UMI Number: 1454989 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas and the Mexican-American
    hsus_te_ch09_na_s02_s.fm Page 305 Monday, April 19, 2004 8:11 AM Texas “Lone Star” flag ᮣ WITNESS HISTORY AUDIO Step-by-Step A Child at the Alamo SECTION Instruction In March 1836, Mexican troops attacked the Alamo in San Antonio, Texas. Among those inside the old mission SECTION was eight-year-old Enrique Esparza. His father, Gregorio, was one of a group of Texans engaged in a struggle to Objectives win independence from Mexico. Some 70 years later, As you teach this section, keep students Esparza recalled hearing sounds of shooting at two in the morning: focused on the following objectives to help them answer the Section Focus Question and “I heard my mother say: ‘Gregorio, the soldiers have master core content. jumped the wall. The fight’s begun.’ He got up and picked up his arms and went into the fight. I never saw • Explain how Texas won independence him again. It was so dark that we couldn’t see from Mexico. anything, and the families that were in the quarters just • Analyze the goals of President Polk. huddled up in the corners. My mother’s children were • Trace the causes and outcome of the near her. Finally they began shooting through the dark Mexican-American War. ᮡ Texans defend the Alamo into the room where we were. A boy who was wrapped in a blanket in one corner was hit and killed.” —Enrique Esparza, San Antonio Express, 1907 Prepare to Read Texas and the Background Knowledge L3 Review with students the attitudes of Mexican-American War American expansionists toward the Mexican provinces of Texas, New Mex- ico, and California.
    [Show full text]
  • Mexican-American War
    LEQ: From what war did the United States acquire most of its land in the southwest? The United States territorial acquisitions from the Mexican War (Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo) are shown in the light/white color in the southwestern United States. This image is from the National Atlas of the United States. It is courtesy of Wikimedia Commons. LEQ: From what war did the United States acquire most of its land in the southwest? Mexican-American War The United States territorial acquisitions from the Mexican War (Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo) are shown in the light/white color in the southwestern United States. This image is from the National Atlas of the United States. It is courtesy of Wikimedia Commons. The Mexican-American War This painting shows the Battle of Chapultepec during the Mexican-American War. Chapultepec Castle was an important position in the defense of Mexico City. It was also the home of the Mexican Military Academy, which had cadets as young as 13 years old. The American victory at Chapultepec drove the Mexican army back into Mexico City. The original drawing was made by Carl Nebel the lithograph was made by Adolphe Jean-Baptiste Bayot (1810-1866). It was published in 1851 The War Between the United States and Mexico, Illustrated. This image is courtesy of Wikimedia Commons. LEQ: From what war did the United States acquire most of its land in the southwest? The United States territorial acquisitions from the Mexican War (Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo) are shown in the light/white color in the southwestern United States.
    [Show full text]