Pennsylvanian Deltaic Sedimentation in Grand Ledge, Michigan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pennsylvanian Deltaic Sedimentation in Grand Ledge, Michigan Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 12-1982 Pennsylvanian Deltaic Sedimentation in Grand Ledge, Michigan Jeffrey R. Martin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Martin, Jeffrey R., "Pennsylvanian Deltaic Sedimentation in Grand Ledge, Michigan" (1982). Master's Theses. 1674. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/1674 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PENNSYLVANIAN DELTAIC SEDIMENTATION IN GRAND LEDGE, MICHIGAN by Jeffrey R. Martin A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty o f The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the . requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Department of Geology Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan December 1982 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. PENNSYLVANIAN DELTAIC SEDIMENTATION IN GRAND LEDGE, MICHIGAN Jeffrey R. Martin, M.S. Western Michigan U niversity, 1982 Pennsylvanian outcrops along the Michigan Basin's southern / margin are composed o f flu v ia l-d e lta ic and marine shelf sediments. Constructive d e lta ic facies include point-bar sandstones displaying erosional bases, channel lag, and upward decreasing grain size and sedimentary structures. Cross-stratification data indicate a uni- modal, highly variant, northward-trending, paleocurrent pattern that deviates from regional paleoslope. Point-bar sandstones record delta plain deposition by meandering d is trib u ta ry channels. Channel margin facies include Lingula-bearing, interdistributary bay shales; overlain gradationally by laminated, flaser-bedded and rooted marsh shales and siltstones; and subbituminous swamp coal. Bay-fill facies are interrupted by lens-shaped, quartz-poor, fine-grained, crevasse-- splay sandstones. Delta destructive facies--quartz-rich bioturbated sandstone-- suggest delta lobe abandonment and landward reworking o f delta fro nt sands over the subsiding deltaic plain. Subsidence resulted in deposition of th in , marine shales and overlying m icrites which contain diverse marine fauna and £20% terrigenous clastic detritus. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Professor William B. Harrison and the late Dr. W. David Kuenzi fo r th e ir help and encouragment in the completion of th is thesis. This report was possible thanks to the help o f the Eaton County Parks system and especially to Jane McCullough, the park director and n a tu ra list o f Fitzgerald Park. I would also lik e to thank my col­ leagues Mary Davis and Dean Bredwell who provided additional information and alternative ideas fo r the deposition of the Pennsylvanian sediments in the Grand Ledge lo c a lity . I thank Dr. W. David Kuenzi, Professor William B. Harrison, Dr. Thomas Straw, Dr. Richard Passero, and a ll of Western Michigan University for reviewing and editing this thesis. Finally, thanks are given to Gulf Oil Exploration and Production Company who helped in the drafting and duplication of this project. Jeffrey R. Martin Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality o f the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark, it is an indication of either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, duplicate copy, or copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed. For blurred pages, a good image o f the page can be found in the adjacent frame. If copyrighted materials were deleted, a target note will appear listing the pages in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photographed, a definite method of “sectioning” the material has been followed. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand comer of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. For illustrations that cannot be satisfactorily reproduced by xerographic means, photographic prints can be purchased at additional cost and inserted into your xerographic copy. These prints are available upon request from the Dissertations Customer Services Department. 5. Some pages in any document may have indistinct print. In all cases the best available copy has been filmed. University Microfilms International 300 N. Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Ml 48106 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1320115 MARTIN, JEFFREY R. PENNSYLVANIAN DELTAIC SEDIMENTATION IN GRAND LEDGE, MICHIGAN WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY M.S. 1982 University Microfilms International 300 N. Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, M I 48106 Copyright m2 by MARTIN, JEFFREY R. All Rights Reserved Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. PLEASENOTE: In all cases this material has been filmed in the best possible way from the available copy. Problems encountered with this document have been identified here with a check mark V . 1. Glossy photographs or pages 2. Colored illustrations, paper or print_____ 3. Photographs with dark background 4. Illustrations are poor copy______ 5. Pages with black marks, not original copy______ 6. Print shows through as there is text on both sides of page____ 7. Indistinct, broken or small print on several pages 8. Print exceeds margin requirements ___ 9. Tightly bound copy with print lost in spine_____ 10. Computer printout pages with indistinct print 11. Page(s)___________lacking when material received, and not available from school or author. 12. Page(s) seemi to be missing in numbering only as text follows. 13. Two pages numbered I___________.Text follows. 14. Curling and wrinkled pages 15. Other University Microfilms International Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . ' . • . i i LIST OF FIGURES . ............... .................. • • ' • • • • • V INTRODUCTION . ............... ...... 1 Previous Investigations ................. .4 Correlation with other Basins ............... ...... 4 Regional Geology and Structure ............. 6 Stratigraphy . ............... 8 INTERPRETIVE ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENT . ............... 12 Criteria for the Recognition of Depositional Environments ........ ^ ...... 13 Transitional Facies and Inferred Environments . 15 Marine Facies and Inferred Environment ....... 29 T erre strial Facies and Inferred Environments . 35 PALEOCURRENT ANALYSIS . .. , .,..... -. • • • • • • 56 PETROLOGY . .... • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • 61 Megascopic Examination ................. 61 Textural Parameters ................... 67 Channel Sandstones . ..... 70 Splay Sandstones ....... .................. 72 Reworked Marine Sandstones .... .................. 77 Other Samples (excluding sandstones) . 78 Chemical Constituents ..... 97 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. SUBSURFACE DATA . ............... ... ...... 100 DEP0SITI0NAL MODEL AND THE HISTORY OF SEDIMENTATION . .... 106 Delta Plain or Channel Margin Facies . 106 Marsh Subenvironment . .... ................ ... 106 Bay Subenvironment . 108 Levee Subenvironment . .................... 108 Abandoned Channel Subenvironment . 109 Crevasse Splay Subenvironment ............... ... , . 109 Destructive Delta Phase . , , . , . , . 110 Reworked Sandstone . ...................... •. • • • HO Black Calcareous Shale and B io m ic rite ................ .«. I l l Meandering Channel Facies . , . I l l Channel Lag Deposits .................. I l l Point Bar Deposits ................. 112 CONCLUSIONS . ............... ...... • • • • • • • • 115 APPENDIX I . ......... ... ......... 120 APPENDIX I I . ..... 121 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY ................ 122 iv Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Index map . ........... ....... 2 2. Locations of measured sections ...........
Recommended publications
  • PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1418 USGS Cience for a Changing World AVAILABILITY of BOOKS and MAPS of the U.S
    PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1418 USGS cience for a changing world AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the current- year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Survey publica­ tions released prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List." Publications that may be listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" may be no longer available. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices given below. BY MAIL OVER THE COUNTER Books Books and Maps Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Tech­ Books and maps of the U.S. Geological Survey are available niques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications over the counter at the following U.S. Geological Survey Earth of general interest (such as leaflets, pamphlets, booklets), single Science Information Centers (ESIC's), all of which are authorized copies of Preliminary Determination of Epicenters, and some mis­ agents of the Superintendent of Documents: cellaneous reports, including some of the foregoing series that have gone out of print at the Superintendent of Documents, are ANCHORAGE, Alaska Rm. 101,4230 University Dr. obtainable by mail from LAKEWOOD, Colorado Federal Center, Bldg. 810 U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services MENLO PARK, California Bldg. 3, Rm.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Succession in Lower Peninsula of Michigan
    STRATIGRAPHIC DOMINANT LITHOLOGY ERA PERIOD EPOCHNORTHSTAGES AMERICANBasin Margin Basin Center MEMBER FORMATIONGROUP SUCCESSION IN LOWER Quaternary Pleistocene Glacial Drift PENINSULA Cenozoic Pleistocene OF MICHIGAN Mesozoic Jurassic ?Kimmeridgian? Ionia Sandstone Late Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Conemaugh Grand River Formation Geological Survey Division Late Harold Fitch, State Geologist Pennsylvanian and Saginaw Formation ?Pottsville? Michigan Basin Geological Society Early GEOL IN OG S IC A A B L N Parma Sandstone S A O G C I I H E C T I Y Bayport Limestone M Meramecian Grand Rapids Group 1936 Late Michigan Formation Stratigraphic Nomenclature Project Committee: Mississippian Dr. Paul A. Catacosinos, Co-chairman Mark S. Wollensak, Co-chairman Osagian Marshall Sandstone Principal Authors: Dr. Paul A. Catacosinos Early Kinderhookian Coldwater Shale Dr. William Harrison III Robert Reynolds Sunbury Shale Dr. Dave B.Westjohn Mark S. Wollensak Berea Sandstone Chautauquan Bedford Shale 2000 Late Antrim Shale Senecan Traverse Formation Traverse Limestone Traverse Group Erian Devonian Bell Shale Dundee Limestone Middle Lucas Formation Detroit River Group Amherstburg Form. Ulsterian Sylvania Sandstone Bois Blanc Formation Garden Island Formation Early Bass Islands Dolomite Sand Salina G Unit Paleozoic Glacial Clay or Silt Late Cayugan Salina F Unit Till/Gravel Salina E Unit Salina D Unit Limestone Salina C Shale Salina Group Salina B Unit Sandy Limestone Salina A-2 Carbonate Silurian Salina A-2 Evaporite Shaley Limestone Ruff Formation
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Hydrogelogic Conditions by County for the State of Michigan. Apple, B.A., and H.W. Reeves 2007. U.S. Geological Surve
    In cooperation with the State of Michigan, Department of Environmental Quality Summary of Hydrogeologic Conditions by County for the State of Michigan Open-File Report 2007-1236 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Summary of Hydrogeologic Conditions by County for the State of Michigan By Beth A. Apple and Howard W. Reeves In cooperation with the State of Michigan, Department of Environmental Quality Open-File Report 2007-1236 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2007 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation Beth, A. Apple and Howard W. Reeves, 2007, Summary of Hydrogeologic Conditions by County for the State of Michi- gan. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007-1236, 78 p. Cover photographs Clockwise from upper left: Photograph of Pretty Lake by Gary Huffman. Photograph of a river in winter by Dan Wydra. Photographs of Lake Michigan and the Looking Glass River by Sharon Baltusis. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes
    35133_Geo_Michigan_Cover.qxd 11/13/07 10:26 AM Page 1 “The Geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes” is written to augment any introductory earth science, environmental geology, geologic, or geographic course offering, and is designed to introduce students in Michigan and the Great Lakes to important regional geologic concepts and events. Although Michigan’s geologic past spans the Precambrian through the Holocene, much of the rock record, Pennsylvanian through Pliocene, is miss- ing. Glacial events during the Pleistocene removed these rocks. However, these same glacial events left behind a rich legacy of surficial deposits, various landscape features, lakes, and rivers. Michigan is one of the most scenic states in the nation, providing numerous recre- ational opportunities to inhabitants and visitors alike. Geology of the region has also played an important, and often controlling, role in the pattern of settlement and ongoing economic development of the state. Vital resources such as iron ore, copper, gypsum, salt, oil, and gas have greatly contributed to Michigan’s growth and industrial might. Ample supplies of high-quality water support a vibrant population and strong industrial base throughout the Great Lakes region. These water supplies are now becoming increasingly important in light of modern economic growth and population demands. This text introduces the student to the geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes region. It begins with the Precambrian basement terrains as they relate to plate tectonic events. It describes Paleozoic clastic and carbonate rocks, restricted basin salts, and Niagaran pinnacle reefs. Quaternary glacial events and the development of today’s modern landscapes are also discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvanian Pewamo Formation and Haybridge Strata of Central Michigan: the Youngest Rocks of the Michigan Basin?
    The Geological Society of America Special Paper 531 Pennsylvanian Pewamo Formation and Haybridge strata of central Michigan: The youngest rocks of the Michigan Basin? Kathleen C. Benison* Department of Geology and Geography, West Virginia University, 98 Beechurst Avenue, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506-6300, USA ABSTRACT Pennsylvanian red beds are the youngest known rocks in the Michigan Basin. Two new formation-level units, the Pewamo Formation and the Haybridge strata, have recently been described. The Pewamo Formation, composed of Pennsylvanian red sandstones and minor laminated mudstones, is known from outcrops, abandoned quarries, and one core in Ionia County. The Haybridge unit is located in the shal- low subsurface and in coal mine tailing piles in Shiawassee County. It consists of red sandstone, red mudstone, coal, and gray mudstone, all hosting Pennsylvanian macroscopic plant fossils. Neither the Pewamo nor the Haybridge rocks have any demonstrated relationship to red core cuttings reported as Jurassic from the central Lower Peninsula of Michigan. No fi rm evidence exists for Jurassic, or any other post- Pennsylvanian rocks in the Michigan Basin. The red core cuttings may be glacial sediments with reworked palynomorphs from rocks transported from elsewhere. A shallow coring project, followed by detailed sedimentologic, petrographic, miner- alogic, and paleontologic studies, is necessary to: (1) refi ne the vertical and lateral stratigraphy of the Pennsylvanian rocks in Michigan; (2) solve the “Jurassic red bed problem”; and (3) understand the late Pennsylvanian–Pleistocene history of the Michigan Basin. INTRODUCTION This time has been referred to as the “missing interval” for the Lower Peninsula of Michigan. The Michigan Basin is rich in geologic resources, including The purpose of this paper is threefold: (1) to provide an over- oil, gas, salt, groundwater, and sand and gravel.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedrock Maps
    1987 BEDROCK GEOLOGY OF MICHIGAN BEDROCK GEOLOGY OF EASTERN UPPER PENINSULA MACKINAC BRECCIA BOIS BLANC FORMATION GARDEN ISLAND FORMATION BASS ISLAND GROUP SALINA GROUP SAINT IGNACE DOLOMITE POINT AUX CHENES SHALE ENGADINE GROUP MANISTIQUE GROUP BURNT BLUFF GROUP KEWEENAW CABOT HEAD SHALE MANITOULIN DOLOMITE QUEENSTON SHALE BIG HILL DOLOMITE HOUGHTON STONINGTON FORMATION UTICA SHALE MEMBER COLLINGWOOD SHALE MEMBER TRENTON GROUP BLACK RIVER GROUP ONTONAGON BARAGA PRAIRIE DU CHIEN GROUP TREMPEALEAU FORMATION MUNISING FORMATION GOGEBIC LU CE MARQUETTE ALGER CHIPPEWA IRON MACKINAC SCHOOLC RAF T DELT A DICKIN SON BEDROCK GEOLOGY OF WESTERN UPPER PENINSULA MACKINAC BRECCIA JACOBSVILLE SANDSTONE EMMET MENOMINEE FREDA SANDSTONE CHEBOYGAN NONESUCH FORMATION PRESQUE ISLE COPPER HARBOR CONGLOMERATE OAK BLUFF FORMATION CHAR LEVOIX PORTAGE LAKE VOLCANICS MONTMORENCY SIEMENS CREEK FORMATION ANT RIM ALPENA INTRUSIVE OTSEGO QUINNESEC FORMATION LEELANAU PAINT RIVER GROUP RIVERTON IRON FORMATION BIJIKI IRON FORMATION GRAND TR AVERSE ALCONA KALKASKA CRAW FOR D OSCOD A NEGAUNEE IRON FORMATION BENZIE IRONWOOD IRON FORMATION DUNN CREEK FORMATION BADWATER GREENSTONE MICHIGAMME FORMATION MANISTEE WEXFORD MISSAUKEE ROSCOMMON OGEMAW IOSCO GOODRICH QUARTZITE HEMLOCK FORMATION BEDROCK GEOLOGY OF ARENAC MENOMINEE & CHOCOLAY GROUPS LOWER PENINSULA EMPEROR VULCANIC COMPLEX MASON LAKE OSCEOLA CLARE GLADWIN SIAMO SLATE & AJIBIK QUARTZITE RED BEDS HURON PALMS FORMATION GRAND RIVER FORMATION CHOCOLAY GROUP SAGINAW FORMATION BAY RANDVILLE DOLOMITE BAYPORT LIMESTONE MICHIGAN
    [Show full text]
  • Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups
    APPENDIX Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups Important fossil taxa are listed down to the lowest practical taxonomic level; in most cases, this will be the ordinal or subordinallevel. Abbreviated stratigraphic units in parentheses (e.g., UCamb-Ree) indicate maximum range known for the group; units followed by question marks are isolated occurrences followed generally by an interval with no known representatives. Taxa with ranges to "Ree" are extant. Data are extracted principally from Harland et al. (1967), Moore et al. (1956 et seq.), Sepkoski (1982), Romer (1966), Colbert (1980), Moy-Thomas and Miles (1971), Taylor (1981), and Brasier (1980). KINGDOM MONERA Class Ciliata (cont.) Order Spirotrichia (Tintinnida) (UOrd-Rec) DIVISION CYANOPHYTA ?Class [mertae sedis Order Chitinozoa (Proterozoic?, LOrd-UDev) Class Cyanophyceae Class Actinopoda Order Chroococcales (Archean-Rec) Subclass Radiolaria Order Nostocales (Archean-Ree) Order Polycystina Order Spongiostromales (Archean-Ree) Suborder Spumellaria (MCamb-Rec) Order Stigonematales (LDev-Rec) Suborder Nasselaria (Dev-Ree) Three minor orders KINGDOM ANIMALIA KINGDOM PROTISTA PHYLUM PORIFERA PHYLUM PROTOZOA Class Hexactinellida Order Amphidiscophora (Miss-Ree) Class Rhizopodea Order Hexactinosida (MTrias-Rec) Order Foraminiferida* Order Lyssacinosida (LCamb-Rec) Suborder Allogromiina (UCamb-Ree) Order Lychniscosida (UTrias-Rec) Suborder Textulariina (LCamb-Ree) Class Demospongia Suborder Fusulinina (Ord-Perm) Order Monaxonida (MCamb-Ree) Suborder Miliolina (Sil-Ree) Order Lithistida
    [Show full text]
  • Italic Page Numbers Indicate Major References]
    Index [Italic page numbers indicate major references] Abbott Formation, 411 379 Bear River Formation, 163 Abo Formation, 281, 282, 286, 302 seismicity, 22 Bear Springs Formation, 315 Absaroka Mountains, 111 Appalachian Orogen, 5, 9, 13, 28 Bearpaw cyclothem, 80 Absaroka sequence, 37, 44, 50, 186, Appalachian Plateau, 9, 427 Bearpaw Mountains, 111 191,233,251, 275, 377, 378, Appalachian Province, 28 Beartooth Mountains, 201, 203 383, 409 Appalachian Ridge, 427 Beartooth shelf, 92, 94 Absaroka thrust fault, 158, 159 Appalachian Shelf, 32 Beartooth uplift, 92, 110, 114 Acadian orogen, 403, 452 Appalachian Trough, 460 Beaver Creek thrust fault, 157 Adaville Formation, 164 Appalachian Valley, 427 Beaver Island, 366 Adirondack Mountains, 6, 433 Araby Formation, 435 Beaverhead Group, 101, 104 Admire Group, 325 Arapahoe Formation, 189 Bedford Shale, 376 Agate Creek fault, 123, 182 Arapien Shale, 71, 73, 74 Beekmantown Group, 440, 445 Alabama, 36, 427,471 Arbuckle anticline, 327, 329, 331 Belden Shale, 57, 123, 127 Alacran Mountain Formation, 283 Arbuckle Group, 186, 269 Bell Canyon Formation, 287 Alamosa Formation, 169, 170 Arbuckle Mountains, 309, 310, 312, Bell Creek oil field, Montana, 81 Alaska Bench Limestone, 93 328 Bell Ranch Formation, 72, 73 Alberta shelf, 92, 94 Arbuckle Uplift, 11, 37, 318, 324 Bell Shale, 375 Albion-Scioio oil field, Michigan, Archean rocks, 5, 49, 225 Belle Fourche River, 207 373 Archeolithoporella, 283 Belt Island complex, 97, 98 Albuquerque Basin, 111, 165, 167, Ardmore Basin, 11, 37, 307, 308, Belt Supergroup, 28, 53 168, 169 309, 317, 318, 326, 347 Bend Arch, 262, 275, 277, 290, 346, Algonquin Arch, 361 Arikaree Formation, 165, 190 347 Alibates Bed, 326 Arizona, 19, 43, 44, S3, 67.
    [Show full text]
  • Open File Report LXXX GEOLOGY of MICHIGAN
    Open File Report LXXX Scenic Beauty of the Pre-Cambrian.............................13 Pre-Cambrian in Lower Michigan.................................14 GEOLOGY OF MICHIGAN X Paleozoic Era ..............................................................14 by Cambrian Period ..........................................................14 O. F. Poindexter The Michigan Basin ............................................... 14 Economic Products of the Cambrian..................... 15 1934 Formation, Sandstone, Shale, Limestone, Dolomite and Conglomerate ................................................. 15 Sandstone..................................................................15 TABLE OF CONTENTS Shale..........................................................................15 Limestone ..................................................................15 I Introduction and Acknowledgments ............................... 2 Dolomite.....................................................................15 Conglomerate.............................................................15 II Definition of Geology..................................................... 3 Scenic Effects of the Cambrian ............................. 15 III Origin of the Earth and Solar System .......................... 3 Ordovician Period.........................................................16 St. Peter Formation ............................................... 16 IV Composition of the Earth’s Core.................................. 4 Trenton Formation (Trenton-Black River).............
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Names of North America Introduced in 19364955
    Geologic Names of North America Introduced in 19364955 ^GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1056-A Names of North America Introduced in 1936-1955 By DRUID WILSON, WILLIAM J. SANDO? and RUDOLPH W. KOPF Prepared with the assistance of BARBARA BEDETTE, JEAN L. EGGLETON, GRACE C. KEROHER, CAROLYN MANN, WILLIAM G. MELTON, JR., KATHERINE DENNISON PALMER, and JACK E. SMEDLEY GEOLOGIC NAMES OF NORTH AMERICA -G E O L O G I C AL SURVEY BULLETIN 1056-A A compilation of new geologic names of North America, including Greenland, the finest Indies, the Pacific Island pos­ sessions of the United States, and the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1957 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director ' For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price $1. (paper cover) FOEEWOBD The "Lexicon of geologic names of the United States" by M. Grace Wilmarth, published in 1938 and reprinted in 1951 and 1957, met a long standing need and continuing demand for a compilation of geologic names. Plans made for future compilations as new names and revisions appeared were interrupted during the years of World War II. In 1952 a sustained effort was begun toward review of geo­ logic publications necessary to furnish a background for preparation of a new edition. After the review was brought up to date in 1956, the present compilation was prepared in order to furnish to the geo­ logic profession, as quickly as possible, some of the essential data concerning the new names that have appeared since 1935.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of Investigation 15 SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY of BARRY COUNTY, MICHIGAN
    Geological Survey Ordovician System .......................................................10 Report of Investigation 15 Cincinnatian Series...................................................10 Trenton Group ..........................................................10 SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY OF BARRY COUNTY, Black River Group ....................................................10 MICHIGAN St. Peter Sandstone .................................................11 by Prairie du Chien Group.............................................11 Richard T. Lilienthal Cambrian System.........................................................11 Illustrations by Author Trempealeau Formation ...........................................11 Lansing Munising Formation ..................................................12 1974 STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY .............................................12 POROUS INTERVALS....................................................12 Contents REFERENCES AND FURTHER READING ...................16 FOREWORD......................................................................2 ABSTRACT .......................................................................2 Illustrations INTRODUCTION ...............................................................3 GEOLOGIC SETTING.......................................................3 Figures MINERAL RESOURCES...................................................3 Index map ...................................................................................2 Surface Minerals ............................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Geochronology and Tectonic Setting of Ordovician Magmatism and Basin Formation on the Laurentian Margin of New England and Newfoundland Francis A
    Boise State University ScholarWorks Geosciences Faculty Publications and Presentations Department of Geosciences 5-1-2017 Bridging the Gap Between the Foreland and Hinterland II: Geochronology and Tectonic Setting of Ordovician Magmatism and Basin Formation on the Laurentian Margin of New England and Newfoundland Francis A. Macdonald Harvard University Paul M. Karabinos Williams College James L. Crowley Boise State University Eben B. Hodgin Harvard University Peter W. Crockford McGill University This document was originally published in the American Journal of Science by HighWire Press. Copyright restrictions may apply. doi: 10.2475/ 05.2017.02 See next page for additional authors Authors Francis A. Macdonald, Paul M. Karabinos, James L. Crowley, Eben B. Hodgin, Peter W. Crockford, and John W. Delano This article is available at ScholarWorks: https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/geo_facpubs/358 [American Journal of Science, Vol. 317, May, 2017,P.555–596, DOI 10.2475/05.2017.02] BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN THE FORELAND AND HINTERLAND II: GEOCHRONOLOGY AND TECTONIC SETTING OF ORDOVICIAN MAGMATISM AND BASIN FORMATION ON THE LAURENTIAN MARGIN OF NEW ENGLAND AND NEWFOUNDLAND FRANCIS A. MACDONALD*,†, PAUL M. KARABINOS**, JAMES L. CROWLEY***, EBEN B. HODGIN*, PETER W. CROCKFORD§, and JOHN W. DELANO§§ ABSTRACT. Ordovician strata of the Mohawk Valley and Taconic allochthon of New York and the Humber margin of Newfoundland record multiple magmatic and basin-forming episodes associated with the Taconic orogeny. Here we present new U-Pb zircon geochronology and whole rock geochemistry and neodymium isotopes from Early Paleozoic volcanic ashes and siliciclastic units on the northern Appalachian margin of Laurentia. Volcanic ashes in the Table Point Formation of Newfoundland and the Indian River Formation of the Taconic allochthon in New York yield dates between 466.16 ؎ 0.12 and 464.20 ؎ 0.13 Ma.
    [Show full text]