Modern Times History of the Catholic Church Iii A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Modern Times History of the Catholic Church Iii A FRATERNITAS TRIUM CORDIUM LIBRARY MODERN TIMES HISTORY OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH III A. D. 1517-1914 HISTORICAL SERIES VOLUME III History of the Catholic Church III: Modern Times: A. D. 1517-1914 Herman Wedewer & Joseph McSorley 1918 Fraternitas Trium Cordium Library - Historical Series, Volume 3 Original: Wedewer, H. & McSorley, J. (1918). A Short History of the Catholic Church , 4th Edition. B. Herder Book Company. This 2019 e-edition is a work of the Fraternitas Trium Cordium. FRATERNITAS TRIUM CORDIUM https://triumcordium.com/ 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS. PERIOD I. (A. D. 1517-1789): FROM LUTHER’S REVOLT TO THE FRENCH REVOLUTION Chapter I. General View Chapter II. Protestantism Art. 1. Luther’s Outbreak Art. 2. Progress of Protestantism in Germany Art. 3. Switzerland Art. 4. France Art. 5. England Art. 6. Ireland Art. 7. Scotland Art. 8. The Netherlands Art. 9. Other Countries Art. 10. Summary Chapter III. The Catholic Church Art. 1. The Catholic Revival Art. 2. The Religious Orders Art. 3. The Jesuits Art. 4. Theology and Catholic Practice Chapter IV. Religious Discords Art. 1 The Thirty Years’ War 2 Art. 2. Theological Errors Art. 3. Eighteenth Century Philosophy Chapter V, Foreign Missions in Africa and Asia Art. 1. The New Movement Art. 2. Africa Art. 3. Asia Chapter VI. Foreign Missions in America Art. 1. The Norse Settlements Art. 2. The Portuguese Settlements Art. 3. The Spanish Settlements in Central and South America Art. 4. The Spanish Settlements in Mexico and the Southern United States Art. 5. The French Settlements Art. 6. The British Settlements PERIOD II. (A. D. 1789-1914): FROM THE FRENCH REVOLUTION TO THE ACCESION OF BENEDICT XV Chapter VII. The Papacy in the Nineteenth Century Chapter VIII. Europe Art. 1. General View Art. 2. Italy Art. 3. France Art. 4. Spain and Portugal Art. 5. Germany Art. 6. Switzerland and Luxembourg Art. 7. The Netherlands 3 Art. 8. Scandinavia Art. 9. Austria-Hungary Art. 1o. Russia and Poland Art. 11. The Balkans Art. 12. Great Britain Chapter IX. Oceania, Asia, and Africa Art. 1. Oceania Art. 2. Asia Art. 3. Africa Chapter X. Eastern Christian Churches Chapter XI. Spanish and British America Art. 1. South America Art. 2. Central America Art. 3. The West Indies Art. 4. Mexico Art. 5. British America Chapter XII. The United States Art. 1. Growth of the Church Art. 2. The Hierarchy Art. 3. Racial Elements Art. 4. Persecutions Conclusion 4 PERIOD I. FROM LUTHER’S REVOLT TO THE FRENCH REVOLUTION (1517-1789): POLITICAL AND RELIGIOUS DISTURBANCES. 5 CHAPTER I. GENERAL VIEW. §154. Tendencies of the Later Middle Ages . At the opening of the Middle Ages, the Church had begun her work among the savage warring hordes that were then destroying the old civilization; and, within a few centuries, she had transformed Europe into a group of Christian nations containing the promise of splendid moral and mental development. Toward the close of the Middle Ages, however, there appeared indications of an approaching storm; and now, at the beginning of the third epoch of Church history, the storm bursts in the form of the Protestant Revolt. Among all classes of the people there had spread a spirit of opposition to spiritual and temporal authority; secular princes resisted both Pope and Emperor; rulers encroached upon the old liberties of the people; covetous men sought to obtain possession of Church property for themselves. The art of printing, fruitful of so much good, produced also great evil, and familiarized the multitude with immoral writings and with satires upon authority and religion. The younger Humanists revived pagan ideas, and aroused an enthusiasm for false liberty. The discovery of new countries upset old social institutions, removed the restraints of custom, and fomented the passion for adventure and booty. Discontent, general restlessness, contempt of authority, scorn for the traditional science and the ancient faith, all foretold a coming revolution. §155. e Religious Crisis . The Church was weakened from within by dissensions among the dierent national elements. The Great Western Schism had developed antagonisms which dealt religion an almost fatal blow. Education, art, law, became first alien, and then hostile, to the Church. The whole world seemed ready to burst into flame, and Luther applied the torch. Only the divine vitality of the Church prevented her total destruction. Quickened by God’s power, however, she was enabled to win back healthy life in the Counter-Reformation. 6 §156. Eects of Protestantism. As time went on and Protestantism developed the logical consequences of its destructive principles, religious conditions became appalling. The rejection of ecclesiastical authority led step by step to indierentism, scepticism, and neo-paganism, The civil power favored an absolutism which fettered religion fatally. Expelled from the schools, the Church became helpless to train new generations in the way of faith and virtue. But the rulers who discredited the authority of religion were the first to suer; for the revolutionary tendency which they had fostered against the Church crushed their own dynasties. Wonderfully enough, amid the universal process of dissolution, the Church began to revive again; and, in the latter part of this period, she again strikingly manifested the indefectibility which had been assured her in the promise of Christ: I am with thee all days, even to the consummation of the world. Map IV. Central Europe in the 16th Century 7 CHAPTER II. PROTESTANTISM. ARTICLE I. LUTHER’S OUTBREAK. §157. Luther’s Youth. In 1483, Martin Luther, the son of a poor miner, was born at Eisleben, in Saxony. Against his father’s wish, he entered the novitiate of the Augustinians at Erfurt, in 1505, impelled to take this step by his morbid fears, rather than by spontaneous inclination. After a brief novitiate, he was ordained priest in 1507, and the next year was made a professor of philosophy in the new university of Wittenberg. He went to Rome in 1510, became a doctor of theology in 1512, and then returning to Wittenberg, began to teach Sacred Scripture, making a special study of the epistles of St. Paul. Driven nearly to madness by his excessive scrupulosity, he was for a while tempted to despair. Then, suering a reaction, he went to the other extreme and took refuge in the thought that all striving after holiness is worse than useless by reason of original sin, and that Christ demands of us nothing but faith alone. These false doctrines, drawn from his misinterpretation of certain passages of St. Paul’s, were plainly armed by Luther as early as 1516, and even at that time attracted unfavorable criticism. In the same year, he publicly defended the thesis that the human will without grace is not free but enslaved. In 1520, he gave clear expression to the logical conclusion of his system in the words: “A Christian who believes cannot, even if he should so wish, lose his soul by any sin however great; since no sin except unbelief can damn him.”1 §158. Luther and Tetzel. Pope Julius II (1503-1513) had begun the building of the new church of Saint Peter in 1506; and in 1517, Leo X (1513-1512) granted an indulgence 1 There had been other instances of inaccurate teaching and of public opposition to the authority of the Church before the outbreak of Luther. John of Wessel, professor of Holy Scripture at Erfurt, ridiculed indulgences, the veneration of the Saints, fasting, Tradition, and especially Church authority. 8 on the usual conditions of contrition and confession to all persons contributing to this undertaking. The Dominican John Tetzel was commissioned to publish the indulgence and came for this purpose to the little town of Jüterbog, near Wittenberg. There was a long-standing hostility between the strictly scholastic Dominicans and the more humanistic Augustinians; and when the people of Wittenberg began to flock to Tetzel’s sermons, Luther and his friends undertook to discredit Tetzel and his mission. On All Hallow’s Eve, 1517, Luther axed ninety-five theses to the door of the university church of Wittenberg, denying that indulgences are of any avail to the souls in purgatory, and contradicting many other received teachings of the Church. Immediately, there was widespread excitement and Luther became the center of a theological storm. The language of the ninety-five theses would indicate that Luther misinterpreted the nature of indulgences. Be that as it may, he was somewhat alarmed at the violence of the discussion he had raised and sent letters of explanation to the Archbishop of Mainz and the Bishop of Brandenburg. But not even in these letters did he make clear his attitude with regard to indulgences.2 The Protestant Plank says that Luther’s zeal against the abuse of indulgences was very plainly due to his wish to spoil the market for them in his own neighborhood. The outbreak was not really due to the tone of Tetzel’s preaching.3 Nor was it due to the depravity of the Church. Rather, it was forced by the logic of events, beginning with Luther’s statement in 1516 of the doctrine of justification by faith alone, without need of confession, contrition, indulgence, or good works. Having long denied the Church’s teaching in his heart, Luther, after his public stand in the ninety-five theses, was 2 He writes: “Seeing that many people of Wittenberg were running after indulgences to Jüterbog and Zerbst and seeing that, as surely as I have been redeemed by my Lord Christ, I did not know what an indulgence might be, nor did anybody else, I began gently to preach that it would be better to do the surer things than to seek to gain an indulgence.” 3 As Luther himself admitted, later on, when he wrote to console Tetzel during the latter’s illness: “He should not blame himself, for the aair did not begin on his account.” 9 forced further and further in his opposition by the logical connection of Catholic Doctrines.4 ARTICLE II.
Recommended publications
  • The Sacramental Presence in Lutheran Orthodoxy
    CONCORDIA THEOLOGICAL QUARTERLY APRIL 1986 Catholicity and Catholicism . .Avery DuIles 81 The !baamental Presence in Luthetrin Orthodoxy. .Eugene F. Klug 95 Toward a New -ran I,ognWics . .Lawell C. Gnxn 109 The Curious Histories of the Wittenberg Concord . .James M. Kittelson with Ken Schurb 119 The Sacramental Presence in Lutheran Orthodoxy Eugene E Klug For Luther the doctrine of the Real Presence was one of the crucial issues of the Reformation. There is no way of understand- ing what went on in the years following his death, particularly in the lives and theology of the orthodox teachers of the Lutheran church, unless the platform on which Luther stood is clearly recog- nized. Luther had gone to the Marburg colioquy of 1529 with minimal expectations. In later years he reflected on the outcome of that discussion with Zwingli, noting that in spite of everything there had been considerable convergence except on the presence of Christ's body and blood in the Sacrament. These thoughts are contained in his BriefCor&ssionconcerning the Holy Sacmment of 1544. "With considerable hope we departed from Marburg:' Luther comments, "because they agreed to all the Christian articles of the faith:' and even "in this article of the holy sacrament they also abandoned their previous error" (that it was merely bread), and "it seemed as if they would in time share our point of view altogether!" This result was not to be, as history records. With all the might that was in him Luther protested loudly throughout his life against any diminution of Christ's body and blood in the Sacrament.' Probably none of Luther's works played as large a role as did his famous "Great Confession" of 1528, the Co~kssionconcerning Christ's Supper.
    [Show full text]
  • Dositheos Notaras, the Patriarch of Jerusalem (1669-1707), Confronts the Challenges of Modernity
    IN SEARCH OF A CONFESSIONAL IDENTITY: DOSITHEOS NOTARAS, THE PATRIARCH OF JERUSALEM (1669-1707), CONFRONTS THE CHALLENGES OF MODERNITY A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Christopher George Rene IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Adviser Theofanis G. Stavrou SEPTEMBER 2020 © Christopher G Rene, September 2020 i Acknowledgements Without the steadfast support of my teachers, family and friends this dissertation would not have been possible, and I am pleased to have the opportunity to express my deep debt of gratitude and thank them all. I would like to thank the members of my dissertation committee, who together guided me through to the completion of this dissertation. My adviser Professor Theofanis G. Stavrou provided a resourceful outlet by helping me navigate through administrative channels and stay on course academically. Moreover, he fostered an inviting space for parrhesia with vigorous dialogue and intellectual tenacity on the ideas of identity, modernity, and the role of Patriarch Dositheos. It was in fact Professor Stavrou who many years ago at a Slavic conference broached the idea of an Orthodox Commonwealth that inspired other academics and myself to pursue the topic. Professor Carla Phillips impressed upon me the significance of daily life among the people of Europe during the early modern period (1450-1800). As Professor Phillips’ teaching assistant for a number of years, I witnessed lectures that animated the historical narrative and inspired students to question their own unique sense of historical continuity and discontinuities. Thank you, Professor Phillips, for such a pedagogical example.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Christian Church*
    a Grace Notes course History of the Christian Church VOLUME 5. The Middle Ages, the Papal Theocracy in Conflict with the Secular Power from Gregory VII to Boniface VIII, AD 1049 to 1294 By Philip Schaff CH512 Chapter 12: Scholastic and Mystic Theology History of the Christian Church Volume 5 The Middle Ages, the Papal Theocracy in Conflict with the Secular Power from Gregory VII to Boniface VIII, AD 1049 to 1294 CH512 Table of Contents Chapter 12. Scholastic and Mystic Theology .................................................................................2 5.95. Literature and General Introduction ......................................................................................... 2 5.96. Sources and Development of Scholasticism .............................................................................. 4 5.97. Realism and Nominalism ........................................................................................................... 6 5.98. Anselm of Canterbury ................................................................................................................ 7 5.99. Peter Abelard ........................................................................................................................... 12 5.100. Abelard’s Teachings and Theology ........................................................................................ 18 5.101. Younger Contemporaries of Abelard ..................................................................................... 21 5.102. Peter the Lombard and the Summists
    [Show full text]
  • The Catholic Doctrine of Transubstantiation Is Perhaps the Most Well Received Teaching When It Comes to the Application of Greek Philosophy
    Bucknell University Bucknell Digital Commons Honors Theses Student Theses 2010 The aC tholic Doctrine of Transubstantiation: An Exposition and Defense Pat Selwood Bucknell University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/honors_theses Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Selwood, Pat, "The aC tholic Doctrine of Transubstantiation: An Exposition and Defense" (2010). Honors Theses. 11. https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/honors_theses/11 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses at Bucknell Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Bucknell Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS My deepest appreciation and gratitude goes out to those people who have given their support to the completion of this thesis and my undergraduate degree on the whole. To my close friends, Carolyn, Joseph and Andrew, for their great friendship and encouragement. To my advisor Professor Paul Macdonald, for his direction, and the unyielding passion and spirit that he brings to teaching. To the Heights, for the guidance and inspiration they have brought to my faith: Crescite . And lastly, to my parents, whose love, support, and sacrifice have given me every opportunity to follow my dreams. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction………………………………..………………………………………………1 Preface: Explanation of Terms………………...………………………………………......5 Chapter One: Historical Analysis of the Doctrine…………………………………...……9
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Marian Doctrine As
    INTERNATIONAL MARIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON, OHIO in affiliation with the PONTIFICAL THEOLOGICAL FACULTY MARIANUM ROME, ITALY By: Elizabeth Marie Farley The Development of Marian Doctrine as Reflected in the Commentaries on the Wedding at Cana (John 2:1-5) by the Latin Fathers and Pastoral Theologians of the Church From the Fourth to the Seventeenth Century A Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate in Sacred Theology with specialization in Marian Studies Director: Rev. Bertrand Buby, S.M. Marian Library/International Marian Research Institute University of Dayton 300 College Park Dayton, OH 45469-1390 2013 i Copyright © 2013 by Elizabeth M. Farley All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Nihil obstat: François Rossier, S.M., STD Vidimus et approbamus: Bertrand A. Buby S.M., STD – Director François Rossier, S.M., STD – Examinator Johann G. Roten S.M., PhD, STD – Examinator Thomas A. Thompson S.M., PhD – Examinator Elio M. Peretto, O.S.M. – Revisor Aristide M. Serra, O.S.M. – Revisor Daytonesis (USA), ex aedibus International Marian Research Institute, et Romae, ex aedibus Pontificiae Facultatis Theologicae Marianum, die 22 Augusti 2013. ii Dedication This Dissertation is Dedicated to: Father Bertrand Buby, S.M., The Faculty and Staff at The International Marian Research Institute, Father Jerome Young, O.S.B., Father Rory Pitstick, Joseph Sprug, Jerome Farley, my beloved husband, and All my family and friends iii Table of Contents Prėcis.................................................................................. xvii Guidelines........................................................................... xxiii Abbreviations...................................................................... xxv Chapter One: Purpose, Scope, Structure and Method 1.1 Introduction...................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Theology : a Series of Questions Upon the Lectures
    SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY: A SERIES OF QUESTIONS UPON THE LECTURES DELIVERED TO THE STUDENTS IN PRINCETON THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY, BY THE Rev. CHARLES HODGE, D.D. EDITED BY A MEMBER OF THE SENIOR CLASS, AND PRINTED FOR THE USE OF THE STUDENTS. PHILADELPHIA. 1865. Entered, according to the Act of Congress, in the year 1865, By Eev. FEEDERICK H. WINES, In the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the United States, in and for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. PRINTEn BY ALFRED MARTIEN, PHir.APEI.PHlA. tv Srom i^ &t6targ of (J0equeaf0eb fig ^tm fo t^ feiBrarg of (Princeton C^cofo^icaf ^eminarj? Br PREFACE Dr. Hodge's method of teaching theology to the students in the Theological Seminary at Princeton is by manu- script lectures, which he reads to the successive classes. The questions printed in this volume are his own ques- tions upon his own lectures, and furnish a general but not an exhaustive view of the course of study pursued in his department. They have been arranged for publica- tion, (by authority of the Senior Class,) and appropriate headings added to them, in such a manner as to indicate to the eye the analysis of the subject, by one of the stu- dents, with Dr. Hodge's consent, but without his super- vision or revision. Whatever of defect there may be in the arrangement is due to the compiler. At present Dr. Hodge is engaged in rewriting his entire course of lectures, and has progressed as far as the subject of Original Sin. Up to this point, the questions are upon the new course.
    [Show full text]
  • Calvin's Doctrine of the Lord's Supper
    Perichoresis Volume 10. Issue 2 (2012): 137-163 DOI 10.2478/v10297-012-0007-3 CALVIN’S DOCTRINE OF THE LORD’S SUPPER * WIM JANSE Free University of Amsterdam ABSTRACT. In order to pinpoint its proprium , it is necessary to understand John Calvin’s Eu- charistic theology within the wider context of the intra-Protestant debates of his time. As a se- cond-generation Reformer, Calvin developed his ideas explicitly in reaction to and as a middle way between the Lutheran and Swiss Reformed discussions of the 1520’s. To that end this es- say first focuses on the main developments from the Middle Ages onwards, and then presents Calvin from the perspective of the positions taken up by some of his contemporaries, in parti- cular Philipp Melanchthon. Next, some representative texts written by Calvin himself are ana- lysed. Although Calvin’s Eucharistic views were not from the beginning a coherent and unified doctrine but developed only gradually, they may be described in a systematic-synthetic way. With respect to the matter of closed, open, and frequent communion, it is observed that for Calvin a regular celebration is essential to the deepening of the believer’s union with Christ. KEY WORDS: John Calvin, the Lord’s Supper, Eucharistic theology, Reformed sacramentolo- gy, communion Introduction Calvin’s doctrine of the Lord’s Supper is not just any chapter from Calvin’s theology. 1 In his Eucharistic theology we touch upon the core of Calvin’s thought. This is true not only for Calvin, but for all major sixteenth-century * WIM JANSE is professor of historical theology and dean of the Faculty of Theology wi- thin the Free University of Amsterdam.
    [Show full text]
  • EVANGELICAL DICTIONARY of THEOLOGY
    EVANGELICAL DICTIONARY of THEOLOGY THIRD EDITION Edited by DANIEL J. TREIER and WALTER A. ELWELL K Daniel J. Treier and Walter A. Elwell, eds., Evangelical Dictionary of Theology Baker Academic, a division of Baker Publishing Group, © 1984, 2001, 2017. Used by permission. _Treier_EvangelicalDicTheo_book.indb 3 8/17/17 2:57 PM 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 3rd edition General Editors: Daniel J. Treier and Walter A. Elwell Advisory Editors: D. Jeffrey Bingham, Cheryl Bridges Johns, John G. Stackhouse Jr., Tite Tiénou, and Kevin J. Vanhoozer © 1984, 2001, 2017 by Baker Publishing Group Published by Baker Academic a division of Baker Publishing Group P.O. Box 6287, Grand Rapids, MI 49516–6287 www.bakeracademic.com Printed in the United States of America All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means—for example, electronic, photocopy, recording—without the prior written permission of the publisher. The only exception is brief quotations in printed reviews. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Treier, Daniel J., 1972– editor. | Elwell, Walter A., editor. Title: Evangelical dictionary of theology / edited by Daniel J. Treier, Walter A. Elwell. Description: Third edition. | Grand Rapids, MI : Baker Academic, a division of Baker Publishing Group, 2017. Identifiers: LCCN 2017027228 | ISBN 9780801039461 (cloth : alk. paper) Subjects: LCSH: Theology—Dictionaries. Classification: LCC BR95 .E87 2017 | DDC 230/.0462403—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017027228 Unless otherwise labeled, Scripture quotations are from the Holy Bible, New International Version®.
    [Show full text]
  • NDICE February 2020
    FEBRUARY 2020 VOLUME 4 • NO. 3 N.D.I.C.E. CONFERENCE OFFICERS Promoting the Continuing Education of Deacons “You are Not Alone” CountdownConference to the By Rev. Walter Kedjierski, Ph.D ell the ‘Ides’ of March Ware certainly right Henry J (Hank) Babin around the corner. As Executive Secretary we progress through this short period of ‘Ordinary 4460 Miranda Drive Time’ and the ‘Hope’ it Olive Branch, MS 38654 John Fridley represents, let us take 901-487-7080 (C) pause and count the many President [email protected] blessings our Lord has 997 Country Lakes Drive bestowed on us. New Baden, IL 62265 As I read through the articles we have in this issue, I 618-558-4805 (H) 618-830-0334 (C) couldn’t help but think how similar the ‘Five Pillars’ of faith Joe Standridge and prayer, observed by our Muslim brothers and sisters, [email protected] Recording Secretary are to our Catholic tradition of Liturgy of the Hours. We are all struggling. Recall, Dcn Jamison’s first article 5916 Parkplace Dr. (Oct 2019) on the ‘real presence’ indicated 73 % of Argyle, TX 76226 Catholics interviewed believed the Body and Blood of Max Roadruck nce a newly ordained priest dealt do I do?” Then she said it, “You were 94-600-0846 Christ presented at Mass, are just symbols. His current with a very challenging situation. President Elect O there, father. That’s all that matters, you [email protected] article provides us a further explanation of the presence He was called to the scene where a were there.” 330 Chatham Drive of Christ.
    [Show full text]
  • Io Theological MOD Bly
    Concoll()io Theological MOD bly MAY • 195 2 Concoll()io Theolog ical Monthly VOL. XXIII MAY 1952 NO.5 The Relation of the Liturgy to the Word By H. Richard Klann HE essential aim of this investigation is not merely the his­ T torical delineation of liturgical practices, nor the consideration of liturgical minutiae in their historical setting and develop­ ment, nor the establishment of a theological basis against liturgical innovations, but rather to state the Lutheran principles by which a pastor will be able to judge the relation of the liturgy to the proclamation of the Word in the worship of a congregation. The term liturgy was taken over from the French litttrgie, which is derived, respectively, from the medieval Latin term litttrgia and the Greek leitourgia. Originally it denoted any rite or body of rites prescribed for public worship. In the modern sense it refers gen­ erally to the public rites and services of the Christian Church. Specifically, it means (a) the Eucharistic rite, called the Liturgy (also Divine Litttrgy) in the Eastern Church, and the Mass in the Western Church; (b) the Eucharistic rite in any of its historical forms, the Roman, the Lutheran, or the Anglican liturgy. For the purpose of this investigation the term Word shall refer to the revelation of God to man, whether it be read or proclaimed in a sermon, discourse, or lecture, with the understanding that Lu­ therans recognize no other "Word" than that which the Scriptures exhibit. The Word is, of course, a part of the formal worship of the Church, and, in this respect, its relationship to the liturgy can be traced historically in the usage of the Church.
    [Show full text]
  • Pentecostal Aspects of Early Sixteenth Century Anabaptism
    PENTECOSTAL ASPECTS OF EARLY SIXTEENTH CENTURY ANABAPTISM By CHARLES HANNON BYRD II A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Theology and Religion School of Philosophy, Theology and Religion College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham September 2009 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract Early sixteenth century radical Anabaptism emanated in Switzerland during Huldrych Zwingli’s protest against the Roman Catholic Church. Much like Martin Luther, Zwingli founded his reform effort on the Bible being the final arbiter of the faith, sola scriptura, and the sufficiency of the shed blood of Christ plus nothing for eternal salvation, sola fide. Based on these principles both adopted the doctrine of the Priesthood of the Believer which recognized every believer’s Spirit empowered ability to read and interpret the Bible for themselves. These initial theological tenets resulted in the literal reading of the Bible and a very pragmatic Christian praxis including a Pauline pneumatology that recognized the efficacy of the manifestation of the charismata. Radical adherents of Zwingli rejected infant baptism as being totally unbiblical and insisted upon the rebaptism of adults, but only on a personal confession of faith, thus the term Anabaptist.
    [Show full text]
  • Transubstantiation in Ecclesiastical Philosophy
    TRANSUBSTANTIATION IN ECCLESIASTICAL PHILOSOPHY BY ROBERT P. RICHARDSON (Continued) Not until jNFarch 10, 1400, did the clergy g?-in their wish of hav- ing ci statute against heresy, but too impatient to wait for this, they illegally fabricated a Common Law, putting forward without basis the doctrine that by Common Law the King had a right to i'^su-e a writ for the burning of a heretic. Action was taken in this illegal manner by issuing a writ of Dc Haerctico Comhurendo against William Sawtrey, a London priest, who declaring himself unable to believe in Transubstantfation was soon reduced to a heap of ashes by the secular arm of kindly Mother Church. This took place Feb- ruary 26, 1400, shortly before the passage of the statute against heresy, the first victim under the latter being a poor tailor, John Badby, who when brought before his judges said that if every con- secrated Host were the Lord's Body then there were twenty thousand Gods in England, which he could not believe, since he put his faith in a single omnipotent God. The Prince of Wales, afterward King Henry V, took a personal interest in Badby's cremation, and while the fire was burning up around the victim ofifered him a pardon with the additional allurement of a yearly pension if he would only acknowledge the truth of Transubstantiation. Priests bearing con- secrated Hosts hovered around the stake and held up the bread that Badby might adore it before he died and thus save his soul. But the perverse heretic would not worship the wafer, and received in the flames his due penalty of death.
    [Show full text]