Staging Tudor Royalty: Religious Politics in Stuart Historical Drama (1603–1607)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Staging Tudor Royalty: Religious Politics in Stuart Historical Drama (1603–1607) STAGING TUDOR ROYALTY: RELIGIOUS POLITICS IN STUART HISTORICAL DRAMA (1603–1607) by Scott James Schofield A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of English University of Toronto © Copyright by Scott James Schofield (2010) STAGING TUDOR ROYALTY: RELIGIOUS POLITICS IN STUART HISTORICAL DRAMA (1603–1607) Scott James Schofield Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of English, University of Toronto 2010 ABSTRACT Staging Tudor Royalty: Religious Politics in Stuart Historical Drama (1603– 1607) examines the plays and pageantry about the Tudor royals in the context of three major events: the Hampton Court Conference (1604), the Anglo-Spanish Peace Negotiations (1603–1604) and the Gunpowder Plot (1605). Chapter 1 provides an historical survey of the political and legal controversies concerning religious belief and practice from Henry VIII’s creation of the royal supremacy (1533–1534) to Elizabeth’s final year as queen (1603). Chapters 2 through 5 comprise four case studies, each of which centres on a play or pageant about the Tudor royals and its relationship to one of the aforementioned events. Chapters 2 and 3 examine Thomas Heywood’s If You Knovv Not Me, You Know No Bodie (1604) and Samuel Rowley’s When You See Me, You Know Me (1604), dramatizations of Elizabeth’s years as princess and the later years of Henry VIII’s reign respectively, in light of the puritan campaigns for church reform and religious toleration surrounding the Hampton Court Conference. Chapter 4 examines the uses of the Tudors in Thomas Dekker’s The Magnificent Entertainment , a detailed account of James’s royal entry of March 1604. In particular, I focus on the London-Dutch community’s celebration of Tudor religious and economic commitments to the Protestant Low Countries in relation to the early Stuart negotiations for an end to the Anglo-Spanish war. Chapter 5 discusses Thomas Dekker’s allegorical rendering of the later decades of ii Elizabeth’s reign, The VVhore of Babylon (1607), as a commentary on the Stuart government’s response to Jesuit insurgency following the Gunpowder Plot. In order to situate these plays and pageants in their precise contexts, each of the four case studies incorporates a variety of historical evidence ranging from royal proclamations to religious polemics, from stories of martyrdom to state trials. This thesis offers a topical reading of play and pageantry in which the Tudor past engages with the seminal political- religious issues and controversies of early Stuart England. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS While researching and writing this thesis I was awarded University of Toronto Open Fellowships and Centre for Reformation and Renaissance Graduate Fellowships. I am grateful to both the Department of English and the CRRS for their generous support. I am also grateful to the Folger Shakespeare Library and the Thomas Fisher Rare Book Library for permission to include the scanned images found in this thesis. Many individuals have assisted and encouraged me over the years. I begin with my advisory committee. Anne Lancashire, my supervisor, has shown incredible patience and understanding while waiting for me to complete this dissertation. Her support, both personal and professional, is a major reason why after many years I completed this degree. I am equally indebted to Randy McLeod. I am particularly grateful for his complete dedication to my work, especially in the final stages. In addition to his reading and re-reading, editing and re-editing countless drafts, he has taught me the importance of taking pride in my ideas and standing proudly behind them. Leslie Thompson’s comments, particularly her final corrections to the thesis, were very helpful. I must also give special thanks to Joseph Black. His external report was thorough and the comments and questions he made at the oral examination were thoughtful. Many other friends have been helpful over the years. Michael Ullyot read various chapters in the cramped quarters of a carrel at Robarts Library. His comments on my thesis, and our conversations on early modern literature and culture, have made me a better scholar. Travis DeCook, Peter Grav, Andrew Wallace and many others have also assisted by offering comments on different chapters. I am thankful for their thoughts and for their friendship. I am also grateful to Kim Yates, Stephanie Treloar, Milton Kooistra iv and the entire CRRS community. For many years now the Centre has been my second home. I must also acknowledge my wonderful family. My parents explained to me from an early age the importance of pursuing your passion. My completion of a PhD is one result of that teaching. Many other family members have also shown their support over the years. Rejane Cote, in particular, ensured that I had space and time to complete an important section of the thesis. Finally, and most importantly, I must thank Carine. From the beginning to the end she has been my most ardent supporter, and for this reason I dedicate this dissertation to her. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ii Preliminaries iii-xi Introduction 1 Chapter 1: State Religion and Individual Belief: the Post-Reformation Debate from Henry VIII to Elizabeth I 14 a) Henry VIII 15 b) Edward VI 23 c) Mary I 27 d) Elizabeth I 30 Chapter 2: “We are her subject, and obay her hest”: Thomas Heywood’s 49 If You Knovv Not Me, You Know No Bodie (Part One) and the Politics of Toleration, c.1603–1605 Chapter 3: Tudor Frustrations and Hopes: When You See Me, You Know Me 82 and the Stuart Political-Religious Controversies of 1603–1604 Chapter 4: The Tudor Legacy of Pan-Protestantism: The Dutchmen’s Pageant, 120 Anglo-Spanish Peace Negotiations, and The Magnificent Entertainment (1604) Chapter 5: After the Gunpowder Plot: Imagining Elizabethan Crisis in 146 Thomas Dekker’s The VVhore of Babylon (1607) Coda 188 List of Works Cited and Consulted 190 vi TRANSCRIPTIONS AND CITATIONS OF EARLY MODERN TEXTS As many of the texts quoted in this thesis do not appear in modern editions, I have chosen to quote directly from early sixteenth- and seventeenth-century editions. Diplomatic transcriptions of early printed titles in the thesis, including the footnotes and the Works Consulted, are either from original sources housed in University of Toronto collections or from Early English Books Online (EEBO). All transcriptions of early modern texts are in unregularized old-spelling, with u/v, i/j, and vv/w represented in their original forms. Long s and ragged r are represented as s and r respectively. For modern editions of early modern texts (e.g. The Statutes of the Realm ), I follow the edition’s orthography. The initial letters of all principal words in titles are capitalized throughout according to MLA style. Spacing and indentation are also standardized in accordance with MLA. The title of Thomas Heywood’s play on Elizabeth, for instance, appears on the title-page to the first quarto of 1605 as: My transcription reads: “If You Knovv Not Me, You Know No Bodie: or, The Troubles of Queene Elizabeth .” and “If You Knovv Not Me ” on all subsequent entries . Since early modern texts are notoriously mispaginated, I cite signatures throughout (e.g. B3v–B4r). All dates follow the Tudor-Stuart calendar year beginning on 1 January (i.e. where 1 January 1604 immediately follows 31 December 1603), instead of the legal year beginning on 25 March (i.e. where 25 March 1604 immediately follows 24 March 1603). vii Transcriptions and Citations of Modern Texts All citations are footnoted in full on first reference, and appear in shortened form on subsequent occasions. Parenthetical referencing is used only for early modern texts quoted extensively throughout the thesis. All other referencing conforms to MLA style. viii ABBREVIATIONS CSPD Calendar of State Papers Domestic: Edward VI–Elizabeth I . Eds. Robert Lemon and M.A. Everett Green. 12 vols. London: H.M. Stationery Office, 1856–72; James I–Charles I . Eds. John Bruce et al. 23 vols. 1858–1897. CSPV Calendar of State Papers: Relating to English Affairs, Existing in the Archives and Collections of Venice, and in Other Libraries of Northern Italy . Eds. Rawdon Brown and G. Cavendish Bentinck. 38 vols. London: H.M. Stationery Office, 1864–1947. EHR English Historical Review ELR English Literary Renaissance HJ Historical Journal HMC Historical Manuscripts Commission . Calendar of Salisbury (Cecil) MSS . London: H.M. Stationery Office, 1860–1976. JEH Journal of Ecclesiastical History ODNB The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography . 2nd ed. 2004–2008 ODNB Online . Oxford Dictionary of National Biography <http://www.oup.com/oxforddnb>. OED Oxford English Dictionary . 2nd ed. 1989. OED Online . Oxford University Press <http://dictionary.oed.com/>. RQ Renaissance Quarterly SCJ Sixteenth-Century Journal SEL Studies in English Literature SP National Archives. State Papers . Domestic. James I (on microfilm at the Centre for Reformation and Renaissance Studies (CRRS), University of Toronto). Larkin&Hughes Stuart Royal Proclamations . Eds. James E. Larkin C.S.V. and Paul L. Hughes. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973–1983. SQ Shakespeare Quarterly SR Statutes of the Realm . Eds. Alexander Luders et al. 11 vols. London: Royal Commission, 1810–1828. SS Shakespeare Survey SStud Shakespeare Studies STC A Short-Title Catalogue of Books Printed in England, Scotland, & Ireland . 2 nd edition. Comp. A.W. Pollard and G.R. Redgrave. Rev. and Enl. by W.A. Jackson, F.S. Ferguson, completed by Katherine F. Pantzer. 3 vols. London: The Bibliographical Society, 1976–1991. ix LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1 Blind Justice from Foxe’s Actes and Monuments (London, 1583) page STC 11224. 5 Figure 2 Image of Henry VIII enthroned from the title-page to The Great Bible (London, 1539) STC 2068. 17 Figure 3 “The Miraculous Preseruation of Lady Elizabeth, nowe Queene of England” in John Foxe, Actes and Monuments (London, 1583) STC 11225.
Recommended publications
  • The English Lyrics of the Henry VIII Manuscript
    The English Lyrics of the Henry VIII Manuscript by RAYMOND G. SIEMENS B. A. (Hons), The University of Waterloo, 1989 M.A., The University of Alberta, 1991 A THESIS SUBMITTED LN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES, Department of English We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA May 20, 1997 ©R.G. Siemens, 1997 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or 'by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. /7 v. Department of The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada Date DE-6 (2788) Abstract The Henry VIII MS (BL Additional MS 31,922)—a song book with lyrics by Henry VIII, Thomas Wyatt, William Cornish, and other literary figures of the early Henrician court—is a document that contributes greatly to a critical understanding of the connections between poetry, patronage, and power in early Renaissance society because of the prominence of its chief author, the King himself, and the manuscript's reflection of literary, social, and political elements of the early Tudor court. Acknowledging that the contents of the Henry VIII MS have been thoroughly treated as "words for music" by the musicologist John Stevens, whose Music and Poetry in the Early Tudor Court and Music at the Court of Henry VIII are the standard works in the area, my thesis builds on existing scholarship to treat the lyrics of H chiefly as "words," as literary texts.
    [Show full text]
  • Congregational History Society Magazine Cover 2 November 2013 22:22 Page 1
    Cover Autumn 2013 v1_Congregational History Society Magazine Cover 2 November 2013 22:22 Page 1 ISSN 0965–6235 Congregational History Society Magazine Volume 7 Number 2 Autumn 2013 CHC Autumn 2013 v4_CHC Autumn 2013 31 October 2013 15:13 Page 65 ISSN 0965–6235 THE CONGREGATIONAL HISTORY SOCIETY MAGAZINE Volume 7 No 2 Autumn 2013 Contents Editorial 66 News and Views 66 Correspondence 68 Notes from the Secretary 70 Obituaries 72 Elsie Chamberlain as I Knew Her 75 John Travell The Historical and Contemporary Significance of Covenant in English Congregationalism, with Particular Reference to The Congregational Federation 78 Graham Akers Review article: The Transformation of Congregationalism 1900–2000 91 Robert Pope Reviews 101 Congregational History Society Magazine, Vol. 7, No 2, 2013 65 CHC Autumn 2013 v4_CHC Autumn 2013 31 October 2013 15:13 Page 66 EDITORIAL We welcome to our pages Dr John Travell who offers us here some of his reflections upon and memories of that pioneering and influential woman minister, Elsie Chamberlain. His paper is, as he makes clear in his title, a personal insight to her character. We are also pleased to include the thoughts of Revd Graham Akers on the concept of the covenant in Congregational churches. Given his role as chair of the Congregational Federation’s pastoral care board, he is clearly interested in the application of Congregational principles in the churches. In addition we include a review article from Robert Pope who has written on The Transformation of Congregationalism 1900–2000, a new publication from the Congregational Federation. NEWS AND VIEWS The Bay Psalm Book A rare and precious but tiny hymnal, dating from 1640 and believed to be the first book actually printed in what is now the United States of America, is to be sold at auction.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicholas Owen
    Saint Nicholas Owen Born: Oxfordshire The son of a carpenter, Nicholas was raised in a family dedicated to the Catholic Church and followed his father’s trade. One of his brothers became a printer of Catholic literature and two were ordained priests. Nicholas worked with Edmund Campion, Father John Gerard and Father Henry Garnet, Superior of the English Jesuits from 1587 – 1594. Sometimes using the pseudonym John Owen; his short stature led to the nickname Little John. He spent over twenty-five years using his skills in the construction of ‘priest- holes’, escape-routes and some annexes for Mass. In order to keep his building-work secret, most was carried out at night, his presence explained by the daylight role as carpenter and mason. Early examples of his work exist at Oxburgh in East Anglia, Braddocks and Sawston. There are over a hundred examples of his work throughout central England. He built around a dozen hiding-places for Thomas Habington’s household at Hindlip Hall, Worcestershire; including that which Owen himself used prior to his capture. The authorities were aware the hiding- places existed, but neither their extent nor who constructed them. Nicholas did not have a formal novitiate, but having received instruction, he became a Jesuit Brother in 1577. In 1581, when Father Edmund Campion was executed, Nicholas remonstrated with the authorities and was imprisoned but later released. He was re-arrested on 23 April 1594 with John Gerard and held in the Tower of London, from where managed to free himself. It is said that he later orchestrated the escape of Father Gerard.
    [Show full text]
  • Trial of Henry Garnet and Jesuit Equivocation in Early
    2nd Place Winner, Dunham Bible Museum, Piece of the Past Essay Contest, 2020 The Trial of Henry Garnet and Jesuit Equivocation in Early Modern England By Michella Taylor In Act 2 Scene 3 of Shakespeare’s play Macbeth, the drunken porter—acting as hell’s gatekeeper—welcomes into the castle a parade of condemned souls, including an “equivocator that could swear in both scales against either scale” (II.iii.9-12). First performed in 1606, scholars have interpreted these lines as direct references made by Shakespeare to the trial and execution of Father Henry Garnet for his complicity in the Gunpowder Plot of 1605. Following the excommunication of Queen Elizabeth by the Pope in 1570 and the Spanish Armada of 1588, the Tudor state began viewing Catholic citizens as potential traitors (Robinson). English Catholics were prohibited from hearing Mass and forced to attend Anglican services under the threat of hefty fines. With the death of Queen Elizabeth in 1603, many English Catholics believed the rise of her successor, King James I, marked the end of an era of Catholic persecution. Under pressure to balance the religious demands of Puritans and other groups, King James I openly expressed his “’utter detestation’ of Catholics”(Robinson). Whereas many English Catholics accepted their fate on the fringes of society, a small group led by Robert Catesby sought retribution. Although the conspiracy to attack Parliament and King James I captured national attention, the only record we have of the proceedings against Father Henry Garnet and the other assailants can be found in A True and Perfect Relation of the Whole Proceedings Against the Late and Most Barbarous Traitors, Garnet a Jesuite and his Confederats.
    [Show full text]
  • DISSERTATION-Submission Reformatted
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5tv2w736 Author Harkins, Robert Lee Publication Date 2013 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 By Robert Lee Harkins A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair Professor Jonathan Sheehan Professor David Bates Fall 2013 © Robert Lee Harkins 2013 All Rights Reserved 1 Abstract The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 by Robert Lee Harkins Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair This study examines the problem of religious and political obedience in early modern England. Drawing upon extensive manuscript research, it focuses on the reign of Mary I (1553-1558), when the official return to Roman Catholicism was accompanied by the prosecution of Protestants for heresy, and the reign of Elizabeth I (1558-1603), when the state religion again shifted to Protestantism. I argue that the cognitive dissonance created by these seesaw changes of official doctrine necessitated a society in which religious mutability became standard operating procedure. For most early modern men and women it was impossible to navigate between the competing and contradictory dictates of Tudor religion and politics without conforming, dissimulating, or changing important points of conscience and belief.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSITION from CORAMBIS to POLONIUS the Forgotten Pun on a Diplomatic Scandal in a Hamlet Q2 Stage Direction Abraham Samuel
    TRANSITION FROM CORAMBIS TO POLONIUS The Forgotten Pun on a Diplomatic Scandal in a Hamlet Q2 Stage Direction Abraham Samuel Shiff 1. Introduction Angered, Queen Elizabeth furiously chastised the audacious Polish ambassador Paulus Dzialinski (Paweł Działyński) with a Latin phrase that became a metaphor for insolence to a superior by a subordinate: Quam decepta fui? Legatum expectavi, Heraldum inveni – Why am I deceived? I expected a Legate, I found a Herald! Shakespeare introduced a pun into the Hamlet second quarto (Q2) of 1604/5 to mock the offending ambassador. The passage of time and a compositor's error in the first folio (F1) edition of 1623 obscured the reference to the 1597 diplomatic scandal. This essay explains the incident, the pun that it generated, and the consequence of the printer's error.* 2. Source Documents The 1597 diplomatic incident is well documented. Eyewitness testimony of the insult and Elizabeth's reaction is in a letter from Cecil to Essex.1 The Privy Council's minutes book2 and Cecil's archives preserved in Hatsfield House3 contain entries pertaining to the ambassador. ________________________ * Derived from Polonius Identified: Scandal to Pun to Gossip to Print, a thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Arts, accepted in December 2009 by the Department of Liberal Studies of the Graduate Center, City University of New York. It is my pleasure to acknowledge the guidance of: Professor Margaret King―my adviser for two thesis on unrecognized Hamlet metaphors; Professor Andrew Majeske―whose encouragement enabled the writing of this paper. Professor Wladyslaw Roczniak―for his kind introduction to Polish works and sources; Barbara Lekisch― for her graciously shared information about Thomas Davies; and Professor Ari Cohen―a friend of many years who is always available to read a draft, this paper is improved by his many critical suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Exegetical Methods of Some Sixteenth-Century Roman Catholic
    Andrews University Seminary Studies, Summer 1985, Vol. 23, No. 2, 161-180. Copyright @ 1985 by Andrews University Press. THE EXEGETICAL METHODS OF SOME SIXTEENTH- CENTURY ROMAN CATHOLIC PREACHERS IN ENGLAND: FISHER, PERYN, BONNER, AND WATSON PART I ERWIN R. GANE Angwin, California 94508 In earlier articles, I have explored the exegetical methods of representative Anglican and Puritan preachers and also of late medieval sermons.' This article and a subsequent one will be devoted to the exegetical methods displayed in sermons of four Roman Catholic preachers in England who flourished in the six- teenth century: John Fisher (1469-l535), William Peryn (d. 1558), Edmund Bonner (l5OO?-l569), and Thomas Watson (1518- 1584). A major question is the extent to which the biblical exegesis and other homiletical concerns identify these preachers as being medi- eval or Renaissance oriented. Are they, for example, more akin to the medieval preachers or to the Anglican preachers we have dealt with in the earlier studies? The presentation that follows will of necessity first give an overview of the careers of these four preachers, noting the historical setting in which their preaching took place. Then, attention will be given to their specific exegetical techniques and homiletical concerns. 1. Overview of the Careers of the Preachers John Fisher John Fisher received his first degree at Michaelhouse, Cam- bridge, in 1483 at the age of fourteen, was appointed master in 1497, '"The Exegetical Methods of Some Sixteenth-Century Anglican Preachers: Latimer, Jewel, Hooker, and Andrewes," Parts I and 11, AUSS 17 (1979):23-38, 169- 188; "The Exegetical Methods of Some Sixteenth-Century Puritan Preachers: Hooper, Cartwright, and Perkins," Parts I and 11, AUSS 19 (1981): 21-36, 99-114; "Late-Medieval Sermons in England: An Analysis of Fourteenth- and Fifteenth- Century Preaching." A USS 20 (1982): 179-203.
    [Show full text]
  • Acknowledgements There Are Several People Without
    Acknowledgements There are several people without whose assistance this thesis could not have been produced. I would like to thank, in particular, the following: Dr Alan Marshal, my supervisor at Bath Spa University College, for his constant nagging to 'get on with it'; Professor Roger Richardson of King Alfred's for his support as my external supervisor; Bath Spa University College for a constant supply of Inter Library Loans, a bursary and a travel grant to Spain; The Andrew C. Duncan Catholic History Trust for a research grant; Mgr Peter Pooling and the staff at Collegio Ingleses, Valladolid, Spain for their hospitality and access to their Archives; Mgr Michael Williams, for his assistance at Archive General, Simancas; Fr Daniel Rees, Librarian, Downside Abbey, Stratton on the Fosse, Somerset for access to the monastic library; Dr Dominic Bellenger and Dr Elaine Chalus, for their support and suggestions; Dr Ratal Witkowski, for Polish biographies; Joan Pattison, Dick Meyer, Irene Stansby for French, Dutch and Polish translations respectively; and David and Louise for being there. I would also like to thank Dr Paul Hyland & Doctor Barry Coward for their useful comments and suggestions that have enabled me to complete this work successfully. This thesis is dedicated to the memory of Charlotte May Anderson (May, 1977). Phis copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. Contents List of Illustrations Abbreviations Preface 12 Introduction 22 1. James VI and I and the Early Seventeenth-Century Political Scene 27 2.
    [Show full text]
  • DISSERTATION-Submission Reformatted
    The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 By Robert Lee Harkins A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair Professor Jonathan Sheehan Professor David Bates Fall 2013 © Robert Lee Harkins 2013 All Rights Reserved 1 Abstract The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 by Robert Lee Harkins Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair This study examines the problem of religious and political obedience in early modern England. Drawing upon extensive manuscript research, it focuses on the reign of Mary I (1553-1558), when the official return to Roman Catholicism was accompanied by the prosecution of Protestants for heresy, and the reign of Elizabeth I (1558-1603), when the state religion again shifted to Protestantism. I argue that the cognitive dissonance created by these seesaw changes of official doctrine necessitated a society in which religious mutability became standard operating procedure. For most early modern men and women it was impossible to navigate between the competing and contradictory dictates of Tudor religion and politics without conforming, dissimulating, or changing important points of conscience and belief. Although early modern theologians and polemicists widely declared religious conformists to be shameless apostates, when we examine specific cases in context it becomes apparent that most individuals found ways to positively rationalize and justify their respective actions. This fraught history continued to have long-term effects on England’s religious, political, and intellectual culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Congregational History Society Magazine
    ISSN 9B?>–?;<> Congregational History Society Magazine Volume ? Number < Spring ;9:: ISSN 0965–6235 THE CONGREGATIONAL HISTORY SOCIETY MAGAZINE Volume E No B Spring A?@@ Contents Editorial 106 News and Views 106 Correspondence 107 The Hampton Court Conference, the King James Version 108 and the Separatists Alan Argent Locals and Cosmopolitans: Congregational Pastors 124 in Edwardian Hampshire Roger Ottewill The Evangelical Union Academy 138 W D McNaughton Reviews 144 Congregational History Society Magazine, Vol. 6, No 3, 2011 105 EDITORIAL In this issue Roger Ottewill conducts readers to Edwardian Hampshire to meet the county’s Congregational pastors, both local, cosmo-local and cosmopolitan (all terms he explains), among whom we find the influential Welsh wizard, J D Jones of Bournemouth, called “the arch-wangler of Nonconformity” by David Lloyd George, who knew a thing or two about wangling. We travel north of the border to study that understated contribution to Scottish Congregationalism, the Evangelical Union, explicitly through its academy. Lastly, like many others in 2011, we turn aside to mark the 400th anniversary of the King James Version of the Bible. In this magazine, our examination of this Jacobean masterpiece involves a consideration of its origins, amid the demands for further reform of the established church, and the growth of those forerunners of Congregationalism, the English separatists. NEWS AND VIEWS We were saddened to learn of the death of John Taylor, for many years the editor of the Transactions of the Congregational Historical Society and, after 1972, of its successor and our sister journal, the Journal of the United Reformed Church History Society .
    [Show full text]
  • The Gunpowder Plot: Terror and Faith in 1605 PDF Book
    THE GUNPOWDER PLOT: TERROR AND FAITH IN 1605 PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Antonia Fraser | 448 pages | 01 Feb 2003 | Orion Publishing Co | 9780753814017 | English | London, United Kingdom The Gunpowder Plot: Terror and Faith in 1605 PDF Book Before he died Tresham had also told of Garnet's involvement with the mission to Spain, but in his last hours he retracted some of these statements. The King insisted that a more thorough search be undertaken. Thomas Wintour begged to be hanged for himself and his brother, so that his brother might be spared. Thomas Wintour and Littleton, on their way from Huddington to Holbeche House, were told by a messenger that Catesby had died. Details of the assassination attempt were allegedly known by the principal Jesuit of England, Father Henry Garnet. Synopsis About this title With a narrative that grips the reader like a detective story, Antonia Fraser brings the characters and events of the Gunpowder Plot to life. Seven of the prisoners were taken from the Tower to the Star Chamber by barge. As news of "John Johnson's" arrest spread among the plotters still in London, most fled northwest, along Watling Street. Seller Inventory aa2a43fc1e57f0bdf. At first glance, it might seem a little odd that I am reading a book so closely connected with November and Bonfire Night at the beginning of August. He also spoke of a Christian union and reiterated his desire to avoid religious persecution. Macbeth , Act 2 Scene 3. This is a complex story, with many players, both high and low, but Fraser lays it out clearly and concisely.
    [Show full text]
  • '[A] Litle Treatyse in Prynte and Euen in the English Tongue': Appeals to The
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 5-2010 ‘[A] litle treatyse in prynte and euen in the english tongue’: Appeals to the Public during the Early Years of the English Reformation Bradley C. Pardue University of Tennessee - Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Intellectual History Commons Recommended Citation Pardue, Bradley C., "‘[A] litle treatyse in prynte and euen in the english tongue’: Appeals to the Public during the Early Years of the English Reformation. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2010. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/733 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Bradley C. Pardue entitled "‘[A] litle treatyse in prynte and euen in the english tongue’: Appeals to the Public during the Early Years of the English Reformation." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in History. Robert J Bast, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Thomas Burman, Palmira Brummett, Heather Hirschfeld Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R.
    [Show full text]