Fungus Resistant Grape Varieties As a Suitable Alternative for Organic

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fungus Resistant Grape Varieties As a Suitable Alternative for Organic G Model HORTI-6344; No. of Pages 21 ARTICLE IN PRESS Scientia Horticulturae xxx (2016) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Scientia Horticulturae journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/scihorti Review Fungus resistant grape varieties as a suitable alternative for organic wine production: Benefits, limits, and challenges a,∗ b,∗ Karine Pedneault , Caroline Provost a Centre de développement bioalimentaire du Québec, 1642 rue de la Ferme, La Pocatiere, Quebec, Canada b Centre de recherche agroalimentaire de Mirabel, 9850 Belle-Rivière, Mirabel, Quebec, Canada a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Areas dedicated to organic wine production have significantly increased over the last few years. The Received 5 November 2015 vast majority of organic wine is made from Vitis vinifera varieties that are highly susceptible to fungal Received in revised form 8 March 2016 diseases and pests, making organic management difficult for growers. Depending on the growing area, Accepted 14 March 2016 20–70% of organic growers declare issues with fungal diseases in Europe. Recently, fungus-resistant grape Available online xxx (FRG) varieties have been recommended as the most suitable choice in organic viticulture, especially in areas where disease pressure necessitates high rates of fungicides. FRG varieties could contribute to Keywords: improved disease management in organic as well as conventional viticulture, reduce production costs Interspecific hybrid and decrease copper accumulation in soils. Recently, many FRG varieties presenting advantageous agro- PIWI grape nomic attributes and enological characteristics have been developed in North America and Europe for Organic viticulture Breeding conventional and sustainable farming. In this review, we present an overview of the benefits and limits Phenolic compounds associated with FRG varieties in addition to the current knowledge regarding berry and wine composition, Volatile compounds canopy management, and winemaking challenges and practices. Resistance © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Powdery mildew Downy mildew Botrytis Contents 1. Introduction . 00 2. Benefits and limits of FRG in organic viticulture . 00 2.1. Breeding for disease resistance and quality . 00 2.2. Economical and agricultural benefits of disease resistance . 00 2.3. Yield . 00 2.4. Marketing and wine quality. .00 3. Growing FRG varieties for organic wine production . 00 3.1. Berry and juice composition . 00 3.1.1. Juice . 00 3.1.2. Berries . 00 3.2. Impacts of canopy management . 00 3.2.1. Managing yield and berry quality . 00 3.2.2. Impact on wine . 00 3.3. Challenges in FRG wine production . 00 3.3.1. Juice extraction and methanol . 00 Abbreviations: FRG, fungus resistant grape; M3GE, malvidin-3-glucoside equivalents; MDGE, malvidin-3,5-diglucoside equivalents; DW, dry weight; FW, fresh weight; LC–MS/MS, liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry; UPLC–MS, ultraperformance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry; HPLC-DAD, high performance liquid chromatography coupled to diode-array detector; CE, catechin equivalent; B2E, procyanidin B2 equivalent; RE, resveratrol equivalent; TA, titratable acidity; TSS, total soluble solids; YAN, yeast assimilable nitrogen. ∗ Corresponding authors. E-mail addresses: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] (K. Pedneault), [email protected] (C. Provost). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2016.03.016 0304-4238/© 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Please cite this article in press as: Pedneault, K., Provost, C., Fungus resistant grape varieties as a suitable alternative for organic wine production: Benefits, limits, and challenges. Sci. Hortic. (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2016.03.016 G Model HORTI-6344; No. of Pages 21 ARTICLE IN PRESS 2 K. Pedneault, C. Provost / Scientia Horticulturae xxx (2016) xxx–xxx 3.3.2. Biogenic amines . 00 3.3.3. Tannins and color. .00 3.3.4. Aroma . 00 3.4. Improving FRG wine quality . 00 4. Conclusion . 00 Acknowledgements. .00 References . 00 1. Introduction carrying both disease-resistance genes and a significant percentage (more than 85%) of V. vinifera in their pedigree; those are gen- Organic wine production considerably increased over the last erally referred to as “PIWI” (from German: Pilzwiderstandsfähige, ten years and accounts for nearly 5% of total production of today’s “disease resistant”) and are accepted as V. vinifera varieties in wine market (Bonn et al., 2015; Willer and Lernoud, 2015). Rea- European catalogues (Sivcevˇ et al., 2010). In some cases though, sons driving consumers toward organic wine varies from health “PIWI” indistinctly refers to both interspecific hybrids and newer concerns to environmental awareness and interest for terroir, and “disease-resistant V. vinifera” varieties (Collective, 2008; Siegfried the overall perception that organic wines are of higher value than and Temperli, 2008). conventional ones (Bonn et al., 2015). Optimal variety selection is a key factor for successful imple- Organic wines are expected to be free of synthetic pesticides, fer- mentation of organic grape production (Fragoulis et al., 2009; tilizers or other synthetic inputs that could pose a higher risk than Sivcevˇ et al., 2010). Recently, FRG varieties have been rec- conventional farming to human health or the environment (Mann ommended as the most suitable choice for organic viticulture et al., 2010; Bonn et al., 2015). However, the vast majority of organic (Pavlousek,ˇ 2010; Sivcevˇ et al., 2010; Becker, 2013). Resistance wine is made from Vitis vinifera varieties highly susceptible to fun- to major diseases such as powdery mildew significantly reduces gal diseases and pests, making organic management difficult for the need for pesticides and thus represents a major advantage growers (Wiedemann-Merdinoglu and Hoffmann, 2010). Depend- in organic farming, especially in humid areas such as Bordeaux ing on the country origin, 20–70% of organic growers declare issues (Galbrun, 2008; Sivcevˇ et al., 2010; Wiedemann-Merdinoglu and with botrytis and powdery mildew in Europe (Collective, 2008). Hoffmann, 2010; Fuller et al., 2014; Weigle and Carroll, 2015). In contrast with conventional viticulture that integrates a Superficies devoted to organic wine production from FRG vari- wide range of synthetic pesticides in pest management programs, eties are not well documented. In Germany, FRG occupied 7.9% of organic viticulture mostly relies on sulfur- and copper-based fungi- organic vineyard surface areas in 2003 but projections were that cides such as the Bordeaux mixture to control major diseases like 40% of the new plantings planned from 2010 to 2015 would be FRG downy and powdery mildews, as well as a wide range of other cultivars (Sloan et al., 2010). In contrast, both old and recent FRG diseases and insect pests (Provenzano et al., 2010). Copper-based varieties have spread extensively.
Recommended publications
  • European Project Grapegen 06 - Grapevine Genetic Resources - Version 18 March 2011 P
    European Project GrapeGen 06 - Grapevine Genetic Resources European Grapevine Catalogue: Towards a Comprehensive List T. Lacombe, L. Audeguin, M. Boselli, B. Bucchetti, F. Cabello, M. Crespan, C. D’Onofrio, J. Eiras Dias, S. Ercisli, M. Gardiman, MS. Grando, S. Imazio, O. Jandurova, A. Jung, E. Kiss, P. Kozma, E. Maul, D. Maghradze, C. Martinez, G. Muñoz, J-K. Pátková, I. Pejic, E. Peterlunger, D. Pitsoli, D. Preiner, S. Raimondi, F. Regner, G. Savin, S. Savvides, A. Schneider, J-L. Spring, A. Szoke, A. Veres, J-M. Boursiquot, R. Bacilieri and P. This Annex 1 A: List of the grape varieties registered in the Member States of the European Union Legend : in bold, common prime name of the variety according to VIVC database when referenced, # identification number of the variety, species, sex (H = hermaphrodite, F = female, M = male), colour of berry skin (B = yellow-green, N = blue-black, Rg = red, Rs = rose, G = grey). In normal characters, name of the variety as registered in the country and its registered synonyms, country, year of the national catalogue's last update available, utilization allowed in the country (W = wine grape, T = table grape, ROOT = rootstock). Synonyms marked with an * are used under condition (see national regulations). 4 444-6 (# PRT482 no correspondance in VIVC database) - - 444-6 (syn. ¤) : PRT - 2010 - ROOT A ABBUOTO (# 7 ) vinifera - - N Abbuoto N. (syn. ¤) : ITA - 2010 - W ABONDANT (# 24 ) vinifera - H - B Abondant B (syn. ¤) : FRA - 2010 - W ABOURIOU (# 34 ) vinifera - H - N Abouriou N (syn. ¤) : FRA - 2010 - W ABRUSCO (# 32 ) vinifera - - N Abrusco N. (syn. ¤) : ITA - 2010 - W ACCENT (# 20540 ) interspecific cross - - N Accent (syn.
    [Show full text]
  • Tastemaker: Bryan Forbes, 7 Vines Vineyard
    Tastemaker: Bryan Forbes, 7 Vines Vineyard thecorkreport.us/2019/03/tastemaker-bryan-forbes-7-vines-vineyard/ Lenn Thompson When I wrote my short piece for Wine Enthusiast Magazine about the exciting things happening in the Minnesota wine industry, I tasted a lot of wine from as many places as I could. You’ve seen several of the reviews here on the site. Thankfully, I’m still getting to taste more of these uniquely delicious wines made from grapes unique to North America’s northern climes. But, it wasn’t until well after my story was filed that I really got to dig deep into the wines that Bryan Forbes is making at newcomer 7 Vines Vineyard in eastern Minnesota, not that far from the Wisconsin border. 1/4 Putting aside the wines he makes from West Coast fruit from Napa Valley, Santa Barbara and elsewhere (that’s another discussion for another day), his Minnesota-grown wines are some of the best being made in “The Land of 10,000 Lakes” and some of the best wines I’ve had from anywhere made from the cold-hardy grapes developed at the University of Minnesota. You won’t find oak-bludgeoned Marquette or syrupy-sweet La Crescent. Bryan has an inquisitive-but-confident winemaking style that focuses on balance and letting these unique grapes show off what makes them, well, unique. As Minnesota earns more attention from a wider audience, it will be people like Bryan leading the way. He’s a true tastemaker in a region that needs more of them.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Wine?
    Developing a Consumer Language to Describe Local Red Wines Using Projective Mapping by Heather Jantzi Thesis Submitted in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science in Nutrition with Honours Acadia University March, 2017 ©Copyright by Heather Jantzi, 2017 This thesis by Heather Jantzi is accepted in its present form by the School of Nutrition and Dietetics as satisfying the thesis requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science with Honours Approved by the Thesis Supervisor __________________________ ____________________ Dr. Matt McSweeney Date Approved by the Head of the Department __________________________ ____________________ Dr. Catherine Morley Date Approved by the Honours Committee __________________________ ____________________ Dr. Jun Yang Date ii I, Heather Jantzi, grant permission to the University Librarian at Acadia University to reproduce, loan or distribute copies of my thesis in microform, paper or electronic formats on a non-profit basis. I however, retain the copyright in my thesis. _________________________________ Signature of Author _________________________________ Date iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank Dr. Matthew McSweeney for supervising this research project. His ongoing support and constructive feedback took away my fears of writing a thesis, and his humour and energy made my learning experience more enjoyable than I ever anticipated. I also extend great thanks to Dr. Catherine Morley; her enthusiasm for nutrition research inspired me to pursue a topic I was passionate about and her outstanding teaching skills provided me with the foundations I needed to turn my research curiosities into reality. Thank you to my parents, Brad and Kristine Jantzi, for encouraging me to make the most out of my university experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Grape Disease Control 2018
    GRAPE DISEASE CONTROL, 2018 Bryan Hed, Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, Penn State University, Lake Erie Regional Grape Research and Extension Center, North East PA 16428 ([email protected]) As many of you know Wayne Wilcox, who has annually provided us with an incredibly thorough grape disease management update each spring, has retired. Filling Wayne's shoes is going to be a tall task to say the least, and the search for his replacement goes on. For now, I will attempt to provide a brief summary of some of the pertinent changes in grape disease control that I hope will be useful for grape growers in the 2018 season. For consistency, I'll roughly be using Wayne's format from his previous newsletter from June of 2017. FUNGICIDE CHANGES, NEWS, & REVIEWS Here is some new, and sort of new information regarding grape fungicides in 2018. First, Aprovia/Aprovia Top. The active ingredient in Aprovia is solatenol (benzovindiflupyr), and while it does not represent a new chemical class for us grape growers (succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor or SDHI) it is one of those 'new generation' SDHIs that Wayne spoke of last year. The SDHI fungicides belong to FRAC Group 7, which also includes chemistries in products like Endura and Pristine (boscalid) and Luna Experience (fluopyram). Aprovia was available for use in most states last year, but has now been labeled for use in New York as well. As a solo product, Aprovia is very effective for the control of powdery mildew as trials in NY over several years have shown.
    [Show full text]
  • Wine-Grower-News #202 June 1, 2012
    Wine-Grower-News #202 June 1, 2012 Midwest Grape & Wine Industry Institute: http://www.extension.iastate.edu/Wine Information in this issue includes: Pressure Control Valves Highly Recommended for Backpack Sprayers Winery Sanitation Basics - The Northern Grapes Project Webinar Series 6-(2-9) Des Moines Wine Festival 6-9, Northwest Iowa Grape Growers Association Workshop – Farnhamville, IA 6-(7 & 8), Comprehensive Elderberry Workshop & Farm Tour – Hartsburg, MO IL State Fair Amateur Wine Competition Open to Out-of-State Winemakers 6-22, NDGGA Wine & Warbirds Tour Mid-American Wine Competition 2012 7-19, ASEV-ES International Symposium on Sparkling Wine Production Iowa State Fair Commercial and Amateur Wine Competitions 7-(6 & 7) Oak Barrel and Wine Workshops Call for Entries - 4th Annual International Cold Climate Wine Competition Notable Quotables Marketing Tidbits Neeto-Keeno WWW Stuff Articles of Interest Show n Tell Videos of Interest Calendar of Events Choose Iowa Quality Wines Pressure Control Valves Highly Recommended for Backpack Sprayers Most, if not all commercial vineyard owners have a backpack sprayer they use for small spray jobs. Some use backpack sprayers for all of their herbicide applications. Often the most common use is to spray glyphsate (ie…Roundup) around the base of the vines. High pressure applications can result in smaller droplets that tend to drift more. The key to an effective glyphosate application is to spray the weeds and not the vine. This is much easier done when the backpack sprayer is set at a low application pressure. I find that a pressure of around 15 psi works best for me to control the application and reduce unwanted drift.
    [Show full text]
  • Viticulture Research and Outreach Addressing the Ohio Grape and Wine Industry Production Challenges
    HCS Series Number 853 ANNUAL OGIC REPORT (1 July ’16 – 30 June ‘17) Viticulture Research and Outreach Addressing the Ohio Grape and Wine Industry Production Challenges Imed Dami, Professor & Viticulture State Specialist Diane Kinney, Research Assistant II VITICULTURE PROGRAM Department of Horticulture and Crop Science 1 Table of Contents Page Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………………………………………..………….3 2016 Weather………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……..5 Viticulture Research……………………………………………………………………………………………………….…… 10 Project #1: Trunk Renewal Methods for Vine Recovery After Winter Injury……………………………………… 11 Project #2: Evaluation of Performance and Cultural Practices of Promising Wine Grape Varieties….. 16 Viticulture Production…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….28 Commercial Expansion of Varieties New to Ohio………………………………………………………………………………….28 Viticulture Extension & Outreach……………………………………………………………………………………………41 OGEN and Fruit Maturity Updates………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 41 Ohio Grape & Wine Conference………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 42 Industry Field Day and Workshops………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 43 “Buckeye Appellation” Website………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 45 Industry Meetings………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 45 Professional Meetings…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 45 Student Training & Accomplishments…………………………………………………………………………………… 49 Honors & Awards………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 50 Appendix……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Baco Blanc B
    Catalogue of grapevines cultivated in France © UMT Géno-Vigne® INRA - IFV - Montpellier SupAgro http://plantgrape.plantnet-project.org Edited on 27/09/2021 Baco blanc B Name of the variety in France Baco blanc Origin Baco blanc was obtained by François Baco (Landes). This interspecific hybrid results from the crossbreeding of Folle blanche and Noah (Vitis labrusca - Vitis riparia). Synonyms In France, this variety can officially be called "Baco 22 A" regarding propagation plant material. Legal information In France, Baco blanc is officially listed in the "Catalogue of vine varieties" on the A list and classified. Use Wine and spirits grape variety. Evolution of cultivated areas in France 1958 1968 1979 1988 2000 2008 2018 ha 24427 20013 8995 4255 2552 1020 787 Descriptive elements The identification is based on: - the tip of the young shoot with a high density of prostate hairs, - the yellow young leaves, - the shoots with an absence of anthocyanin coloration and with 2 or less consecutive tendrils, - the large, circular or wedge-shaped adult leaves, entire or with three or five lobes, with deep U-shaped lateral sinuses, an open V or U-shaped petiole sinus, short teeth compared to their width at the base with straight sides, no anthocyanin coloration of veins, a moderately or heavily blistered leaf blade, and on the lower side of the leaves, a high density of prostate hairs of the blade and none or in a very low density on the veins, - the round-shaped berries, with a soft pulp and a slightly foxy flavor. Genetic profile Microsatellite VVS2 VVMD5 VVMD7 VVMD27 VRZAG62 VRZAG79 VVMD25 VVMD28 VVMD32 Allel 1 122 223 235 178 196 244 238 243 249 Allel 2 131 223 239 184 206 250 238 257 271 Phenology Bud burst: 6 days after Chasselas.
    [Show full text]
  • Observations of German Viticulture
    Observations of German Viticulture GregGreg JohnsJohns TheThe OhioOhio StateState UniversityUniversity // OARDCOARDC AshtabulaAshtabula AgriculturalAgricultural ResearchResearch StationStation KingsvilleKingsville The Group Under the direction of the Ohio Grape Industries Committee Organized by Deutsches Weininstitute Attended by 20+ representatives ODA Director & Mrs. Dailey OGIC Mike Widner OSU reps. Todd Steiner & Greg Johns Ohio (and Pa) Winegrowers / Winemakers Wine Distributor Kerry Brady, our guide Others Itinerary March 26 March 29 Mosel Mittelrhein & Nahe Join group - Koblenz March 30 March 27 Rheingau Educational sessions March 31 Lower Mosel Rheinhessen March 28 April 1 ProWein - Dusseldorf Depart Observations of the German Winegrowing Industry German wine educational sessions German Wine Academy ProWein - Industry event Showcase of wines from around the world Emphasis on German wines Tour winegrowing regions Vineyards Wineries Geisenheim Research Center German Wine Academy Deutsches Weininstitute EducationEducation -- GermanGerman StyleStyle WinegrowingWinegrowing RegionsRegions RegionalRegional IdentityIdentity LabelingLabeling Types/stylesTypes/styles WineWine LawsLaws TastingsTastings ProWein German Winegrowing Regions German Wine Regions % white vs. red Rheinhessen 68%White 32%Red Pfalz 60% 40% Baden 57% 43% Wurttemberg 30% 70%*** Mosel-Saar-Ruwer 91% 9% Franken 83% 17% Nahe 75% 25% Rheingau 84% 16% Saale-Unstrut 75% 25% Ahr 12% 88%*** Mittelrhein 86% 14%
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Grape Maturity at OSU Research Vineyards Imed Dami, Diane Kinney, Andy Kirk, Yvonne Woodworth, the Ohio State University
    OHIO AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER 2019 Grape Maturity at OSU Research Vineyards Imed Dami, Diane Kinney, Andy Kirk, Yvonne Woodworth, The Ohio State University. Thanks to the continuous interest by Ohio growers and vintners and support by the Ohio Grape Industries Committee, we are pleased to resume monitoring fruit maturity progression of varieties grown at the research vineyards during the 2019 season. This information will be sent weekly to OGEN subscribers and posted on the program website, Buckeye Appellation. The date of berry sampling and corresponding heat units or growing degree days (GDD) are included. Note that the GDD in your location could be higher or lower than that at our sites. For example, at the Wooster research vineyard, grape ripening of similar varieties is typically 1 to 2 weeks behind central and southern Ohio, and 1 to 2 weeks ahead of more northern latitude vineyards and on Lake Erie shores. To determine the GDD in your location, visit the OSU-GDD Calculator. To learn more about monitoring fruit maturity and berry sampling, please read OSU factsheet at the following link: Are your grapes ready to pick? Click here for Fruit maturity from previous years. We wish you bountiful and successful harvest!! rape maturity of grape varieties at the Wooster research vineyard: G (1) Sampling Date: 8/20/2019 (GDD=2138) 100 Harvest Variety Berry SS (%) pH T.A. (g/L) FMI Date wt (g) Chardonnay 136 15.2 2.93 16.9 9 Chambourcin 187 14.3 2.79 18.3 8 La Crescent 138 17.9 2.89 16.0 11 Marquette 144 18.3 2.90 16.1 11 Regent 169 17.0 3.20 13.3 13 Sauvignon blanc 139 17.5 2.94 16.8 10 *SS: soluble solids, which estimate sugar concentration in grape juice using a refractometer.
    [Show full text]
  • Determining the Classification of Vine Varieties Has Become Difficult to Understand Because of the Large Whereas Article 31
    31 . 12 . 81 Official Journal of the European Communities No L 381 / 1 I (Acts whose publication is obligatory) COMMISSION REGULATION ( EEC) No 3800/81 of 16 December 1981 determining the classification of vine varieties THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Whereas Commission Regulation ( EEC) No 2005/ 70 ( 4), as last amended by Regulation ( EEC) No 591 /80 ( 5), sets out the classification of vine varieties ; Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, Whereas the classification of vine varieties should be substantially altered for a large number of administrative units, on the basis of experience and of studies concerning suitability for cultivation; . Having regard to Council Regulation ( EEC) No 337/79 of 5 February 1979 on the common organization of the Whereas the provisions of Regulation ( EEC) market in wine C1), as last amended by Regulation No 2005/70 have been amended several times since its ( EEC) No 3577/81 ( 2), and in particular Article 31 ( 4) thereof, adoption ; whereas the wording of the said Regulation has become difficult to understand because of the large number of amendments ; whereas account must be taken of the consolidation of Regulations ( EEC) No Whereas Article 31 of Regulation ( EEC) No 337/79 816/70 ( 6) and ( EEC) No 1388/70 ( 7) in Regulations provides for the classification of vine varieties approved ( EEC) No 337/79 and ( EEC) No 347/79 ; whereas, in for cultivation in the Community ; whereas those vine view of this situation, Regulation ( EEC) No 2005/70 varieties
    [Show full text]
  • Growing Grapes in Missouri
    MS-29 June 2003 GrowingGrowing GrapesGrapes inin MissouriMissouri State Fruit Experiment Station Missouri State University-Mountain Grove Growing Grapes in Missouri Editors: Patrick Byers, et al. State Fruit Experiment Station Missouri State University Department of Fruit Science 9740 Red Spring Road Mountain Grove, Missouri 65711-2999 http://mtngrv.missouristate.edu/ The Authors John D. Avery Patrick L. Byers Susanne F. Howard Martin L. Kaps Laszlo G. Kovacs James F. Moore, Jr. Marilyn B. Odneal Wenping Qiu José L. Saenz Suzanne R. Teghtmeyer Howard G. Townsend Daniel E. Waldstein Manuscript Preparation and Layout Pamela A. Mayer The authors thank Sonny McMurtrey and Katie Gill, Missouri grape growers, for their critical reading of the manuscript. Cover photograph cv. Norton by Patrick Byers. The viticulture advisory program at the Missouri State University, Mid-America Viticulture and Enology Center offers a wide range of services to Missouri grape growers. For further informa- tion or to arrange a consultation, contact the Viticulture Advisor at the Mid-America Viticulture and Enology Center, 9740 Red Spring Road, Mountain Grove, Missouri 65711- 2999; telephone 417.547.7508; or email the Mid-America Viticulture and Enology Center at [email protected]. Information is also available at the website http://www.mvec-usa.org Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction.................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 2 Considerations in Planning a Vineyard ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Phenolic Compounds As Markers of Wine Quality and Authenticity
    foods Review Phenolic Compounds as Markers of Wine Quality and Authenticity Vakare˙ Merkyte˙ 1,2 , Edoardo Longo 1,2,* , Giulia Windisch 1,2 and Emanuele Boselli 1,2 1 Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Piazza Università 5, 39100 Bozen-Bolzano, Italy; [email protected] (V.M.); [email protected] (G.W.); [email protected] (E.B.) 2 Oenolab, NOI Techpark South Tyrol, Via A. Volta 13B, 39100 Bozen-Bolzano, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-0471-017691 Received: 29 October 2020; Accepted: 28 November 2020; Published: 1 December 2020 Abstract: Targeted and untargeted determinations are being currently applied to different classes of natural phenolics to develop an integrated approach aimed at ensuring compliance to regulatory prescriptions related to specific quality parameters of wine production. The regulations are particularly severe for wine and include various aspects of the viticulture practices and winemaking techniques. Nevertheless, the use of phenolic profiles for quality control is still fragmented and incomplete, even if they are a promising tool for quality evaluation. Only a few methods have been already validated and widely applied, and an integrated approach is in fact still missing because of the complex dependence of the chemical profile of wine on many viticultural and enological factors, which have not been clarified yet. For example, there is a lack of studies about the phenolic composition in relation to the wine authenticity of white and especially rosé wines. This review is a bibliographic account on the approaches based on phenolic species that have been developed for the evaluation of wine quality and frauds, from the grape varieties (of V.
    [Show full text]